Comprehensive genomic profiling of Finnish lung adenocarcinoma cohort reveals high clinical actionability and SMARCA4 altered tumors with variable histology and poor prognosis

A Critical Review of the Impact of SMARCA4 Mutations on Survival Outcomes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This critical review investigates the impact of SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A, member 4 (SMARCA4) mutations on survival outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through an analysis of 21 peer-reviewed articles. Survival analyses across this review demonstrated consistently worse outcomes for SMARCA4-mutated vs. SMARCA4 wild-type NSCLC patients, specifically emphasizing class 1 truncating mutations as an independent factor for poor overall survival. In addition, this review explores the clinicopathologic characteristics of SMARCA4 mutations and their impact on various treatment modalities, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) both with and without Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) co-mutations. The potential ineffectiveness of ICI treatment in NSCLC is explored through the impact of SMARCA4/KRAS co-mutations on the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, this NSCLC review consistently reported statistically worse overall survival outcomes for SMARCA4/KRAS co-mutations than SMARCA4 wild-type/KRAS-mutated cohorts, extending across ICIs, chemo-immunotherapy (CIT), and KRAS G12C inhibitors. Designing prospective clinical SMARCA4-mutated or SMARCA4/KRAS co-mutated NSCLC trials to evaluate targeted therapies and immunotherapy may lead to a better understanding of how to improve cancer patients' outcomes and survival rates.

SMARCA4 alterations in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

A mutation in the SMARCA4 gene which encodes BRG1, a common catalytic subunit of switch/sucrose non-fermentable chromatin-remodelling complexes, plays a vital role in carcinogenesis. SMARCA4 mutations are present in approximately 10% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), making it a crucial gene in NSCLC, but with varying prognostic associations. To explore this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prognostic significance of SMARCA4 mutations in NSCLC.

METHODS

Electronic database search was performed from inception to December 2022. Study characteristics and prognostic data were extracted from each eligible study. Depending on heterogeneity, pooled HR and 95% CI were derived using the random-effects or fixed-effects models.

RESULTS

8 studies (11 cohorts) enrolling 8371 patients were eligible for inclusion. Data on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were available from 8 (10 cohorts) and 1 (3 cohorts) studies, respectively. Comparing SMARCA4-mutated NSCLC patients with SMARCA4-wild-type NSCLC patients, the summary HRs for OS and PFS were 1.49 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.87; I2=84%) and 3.97 (95% CI 1.32 to 11.92; I2=79%), respectively. The results from the trim-and-fill method for publication bias and sensitivity analysis were inconsistent with the primary analyses. Three studies reported NSCLC prognosis for category I and II mutations separately; category I was significantly associated with OS.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that SMARCA4 mutation negatively affects NSCLC OS and PFS. The prognostic effects of SMARCA4-co-occurring mutations and the predictive role of SMARCA4 mutation status in immunotherapy require further exploration.

SMARCA4 deficiency and mutations are frequent in large cell lung carcinoma and are prognostically significant

SMARCA4 mutation has emerged as a marker of poor prognosis in lung cancer and has potential predictive value in cancer treatment, but recommendations for which patients require its investigation are lacking. We comprehensively studied SMARCA4 alterations and the clinicopathological significance in a large cohort of immunohistochemically-subtyped non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 1416 patients was studied for the presence of SMARCA4 deficiency by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Thereafter, comprehensive sequencing of tumours was performed for 397 of these patients to study the mutational spectrum of SWI/SNF and SMARCA4 aberrations. IHC evidence of SMARCA4 deficiency was found in 2.9% of NSCLC. Of the sequenced tumours, 38.3% showed aberration in SWI/SNF complex, and 9.3% had SMARCA4 mutations. Strikingly, SMARCA4 aberrations were much more prevalent in large cell carcinoma (LCC) than other histological tumour subtypes. SMARCA4-deficient and SMARCA4-mutated tumours accounted for 40.5% and 51.4% of all LCC, respectively. Multivariable analyses confirmed SMARCA4 mutation was an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer. The immunophenotype of a subset of these tumours frequently showed TTF1 negativity and HepPAR1 positivity. SMARCA4 mutation or its deficiency was associated with positive smoking history and poor prognosis. It also demonstrated mutual exclusion with EGFR mutation. Taken together, the high incidence of SMARCA4 aberrations in LCC may indicate its diagnostic and prognostic value. Our study established the necessity of SMARCA4 IHC in the identification of SMARCA4-aberrant tumours, and this may be of particular importance in LCC and tumours without known driver events.

Real-World Evidence Study of Patients with KRAS-Mutated NSCLC in Finland

While KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), KRAS-mutant tumors have long been considered difficult to treat and thus, an unmet need still remains. Partly due to the lack of targeted treatments, comprehensive real-world description of NSCLC patients with KRAS mutation is still largely missing in Finland. In this study, all adult patients diagnosed with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic NSCLC from 1 January 2018 to 31 August 2020 at the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa were first identified in this retrospective registry-based real-world study. The final cohort included only patients tested with next generation sequencing (NGS) and was stratified by the KRAS mutation status. A total of 383 patients with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic NSCLC and with NGS testing performed were identified. Patients with KRAS mutation (KRAS G12C n = 35, other KRAS n = 74) were younger than patients without KRAS mutations, were all previous or current smokers, and had more often metastatic disease at diagnosis. Also, these patients had poorer survival, with higher age, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) being 5 or above, and KRAS G12C being the most significant risk factors associated with poorer survival. This suggests that the patients with KRAS mutation have a more aggressive disease and/or tumors with KRAS mutation are more difficult to treat, at least without effective targeted therapies.

[Evaluation of Efficacy and Prognosis Analysis of Stage III-IV SMARCA4-deficient Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated by PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors plus Chemotherapy and Chemotherapy]

BACKGROUND

The SMARCA4 mutation has been shown to account for at least 10% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the present, conventional radiotherapy and targeted therapy are difficult to improve outcomes due to the highly aggressive and refractory nature of SMARCA4-deficient NSCLC (SMARCA4-DNSCLC) and the absence of sensitive site mutations for targeted drug therapy, and chemotherapy combined with or without immunotherapy is the main treatment. Effective SMARCA4-DNSCLC therapeutic options, however, are still debatable. Our study aimed to investigate the efficacy and prognosis of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with chemotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with stage III-IV SMARCA4-DNSCLC.

METHODS

46 patients with stage III-IV SMARCA4-DNSCLC were divided into two groups based on their treatment regimen: the chemotherapy group and the PD-1 ICIs plus chemotherapy group, and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Efficacy assessment and survival analysis were performed in both groups, and the influencing factors for prognosis were explored for patients with SMARCA4-DNSCLC.

RESULTS

Male smokers are more likely to develop SMARCA4-DNSCLC. There was no significant difference in the objective response rate (76.5% vs 69.0%, P=0.836) between chemotherapy and the PD-1 ICIs plus chemotherapy or the disease control rate (100.0% vs 89.7%, P=0.286). The one-year overall survival rate in the group with PD-1 ICIs plus chemotherapy was 62.7%, and that of the chemotherapy group was 46.0%. The difference in median progression-free survival (PFS) between the PD-1 ICIs plus chemotherapy group and the chemotherapy group was statistically significant (9.3 mon vs 6.1 mon, P=0.048). The results of Cox regression analysis showed that treatment regimen and smoking history were independent influencing factors of PFS in patients with stage III-IV SMARCA4-DNSCLC, and family history was an individual influencing factor of overall survival in patients with stage III-IV SMARCA4-DNSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment regimen may be a prognostic factor for patients with SMARCA4-DNSCLC, and patients with PD-1 ICIs plus chemotherapy may have a better prognosis.

Retrospective analysis of real-world data to evaluate actionability of a comprehensive molecular profiling panel in solid tumor tissue samples (REALM study)

INTRODUCTION

Considering the growing interest in matched cancer treatment, our aim was to evaluate the ability of a comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assay to propose at least one targeted therapy given an identified genomic alteration or signature (actionability), and to collect the treatment modifications based on the CGP test results in clinical practise for solid tumors.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicentre French study was conducted among 25 centres that participated in a free of charge program between 2017 and 2019 for a tissue CGP test. Data were collected on the patient, disease, tumor genomic profile, treatment suggested in the report (related to the genomic profile results) and subsequent therapeutic decisions according to the physician's declaration.

RESULTS

Among the 416 patients, most had lung cancer (35.6%), followed by biliary tract cancer (11.5%) or rare cancers (11.1%); 75% had a metastatic disease. The actionability was 75.0% (95% CI [70.6%-78.9%]) for all patients, 85.1% and 78.4%, respectively in lung cancer and metastatic patients. After exclusion of clinical trial suggestions, the actionability decreased to 62.3% (95% CI [57.5%-66.8%]). Treatment modification based on the test results was observed in 17.3% of the patients and was more frequent in metastatic disease (OR = 2.73, 95% CI [1.31-5.71], p = 0.007). The main reasons for no treatment modification were poor general condition (33.2%) and stable disease or remission (30.2%). The genomic-directed treatment changes were performed mostly during the first six months after the CGP test, and interestingly a substantial part was observed from six to 24 months after the genomic profiling.

CONCLUSION

This French study provides information on the real-life actionability of a CGP test based on tissue samples, and trends to confirm its utility in clinical practice across the course of the disease, in particularly for patients with lung cancer and/or advanced disease.

The prognostic value of TMB in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Tumor mutation burden (TMB) has been validated as a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response and survival in numerous cancer types. Limited data is available on the inherent prognostic role of TMB in early-stage tumors.

Objective

To evaluate the prognostic role of TMB in early-stage, resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis of pertinent prospective and retrospective studies.

Data sources and methods

Publication search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Based on the level of heterogeneity, a random- or fixed-effects model was used to calculate pooled effects of hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The source of heterogeneity was investigated using sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and publication bias assessment.

Results

Ten studies comprising 2520 patients were included in this analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in OS (HR, 1.18, 95% CI, 0.70, 1.33; p 0.53, I2 = 80%; phet < 0.0001) and DFS (HR, 1.18, 95% CI, 0.91, 1.52; p = 0.53, I2 = 75%; phet = 0.0001) between the high-TMB and low-TMB group. Subgroup analyses indicated that East Asian ethnicity, and TMB detected using whole exome sequencing, and studies with <100 patients had poor DFS in the high-TMB group.

Conclusion

The inherent prognostic role of TMB is limited in early-stage NSCLC. Ethnic differences in mutation burden must be considered while designing future trials on neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Further research in the harmonization and standardization of panel-based TMB is essential for its widespread clinical utility.Registration: CRD42023392846.