Tumoral markers in tumors of the pineal region

Pediatric pineal region masses: a single-center experience over 25 years

PURPOSE

Pineal region tumors (PRT) represent less than 1% of brain neoplasms. The rare and heterogeneous nature of these tumors is reflected in the variety of treatment modalities employed.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of all pediatric patients with pineal region tumors between November 1996 and June 2021 was performed. Fifty-six cases of pineal tumors were reviewed for age and symptoms upon presentation, diagnostic methods, imaging characteristics, histological classification, treatment modalities, recurrence, and mortality rates.

RESULTS

The average age at diagnosis was 11.3 years. The majority of patients were male (82.1%) and Caucasian (73.2%). The most common presenting symptoms were headache (n = 38, 67.9%) and visual problems (n = 34, 60.7%). Hydrocephalus was present in 49 patients (87.5%). Germinoma (n = 20, 35.7%) and non-germinomatous germ cell tumor (NGGCT) (n = 17, 30.4%) were the most common tumors. Chemotherapy was employed for 54 patients (96.4%), radiation for 49 (87.5%), and surgical resection for 14 (25.0%). The average duration of treatment was 5.9 months. Progression-free survival was 74.4% at 5 years and 72.0% at 10 years. Overall survival was 85.7% at 5 years and 77.1% at 10 years.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of pineal region tumors must be targeted to each patient based on presentation, subtype, presence of hydrocephalus, and extent of disease. Upfront surgical resection is usually not indicated. As advances in oncological care proceed, treatment modalities may continue to improve in efficacy.

Results of the treatment of pineal tumors in children: the Lyon experience

INTRODUCTION

Pineal tumors are rare and their incidence is of 1% among all pediatric tumors of the central nervous system. Patient survival depends on the histology, the extension of the surgical removal, and the efficacy of the complementary treatment (chemotherapy and cranio-spinal irradiation), as well as the age of the patient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we analyzed 151 pediatric patients treated for pineal tumors from 1997 to 2020 in Lyon, France. All patients were recorded in the French Register of Pineal tumors, which has been centralized and maintained in Lyon since 2010.

RESULTS

Our analysis shows that benign tumors have an overall positive prognosis with total surgical removal. Concerning pineal parenchymal tumors, pinealoblastomas have a poor prognosis , especially in children less than three years old. A new pathological classification system allows for a better stratification of patient risk within different groups of patients with pineal tumors. It is also important to note that the identification of DICER 1 syndrome in families with pinealoblastomas warrant further medical investigation. Patients with Germ Cell Tumors have more favorable outcomes, with a global survival rate of 87 % and a pure germinoma survival rate of almost 97%. When analyzing the prognosis of pineal gland gliomas, otherwise known as tectal plate gliomas, pilocytic astrocytomas had a promising prognosis. Otherwise, prognosis of other tectal plate gliomas are related to the grade of malignancy and the efficacy of complementary treatment. Lastly, papillary tumors need a complete removal for the best chance of survival, and Atypical teratoid/ rabdoid tumors (AT/TR) still have a bad prognosis, regardless of surgical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that, with regards to pediatric pineal region tumors, there are still areas in prognostic indicators that need to be improved. Similarly, these pathologies need to be treated via a multidisciplinary approach to improve a patient's survival rate and their quality of life.

Intravascular Papillary Endothelial Hyperplasia of the Pineal Region: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia (IPEH) is a benign vascular lesion that is uncommon in the central nervous system. To our knowledge, there has been only one previous report of occurrence in the pineal region. We present a second case and a review of the literature.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 28-year-old woman presented with 1 month of headaches and visual auras. Brain magnetic resonance imaging scan demonstrated a 2.6- × 1.8- × 1.3-cm nonenhancing T1-hypointense, T2-/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-hyperintense pineal region mass with cerebral aqueduct obstruction and hydrocephalus. She underwent placement of a right extraventricular drain followed by complete surgical resection. Histologic analysis was consistent with IPEH.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rare, IPEH is an entity that should be considered in the differential diagnosis for intracranial masses with radiographic features characteristic of vascular lesions. Tissue sampling is imperative for distinction from more malignant entities. Complete resection is curative and is the standard of care when feasible. Given the risk of local progression and neurologic compromise with subtotal resection of central nervous system lesions, further study regarding adjuvant treatment options is warranted.

Biomarkers of Pineal Region Tumors: A Review

Background: The pineal gland, a small, pinecone-shaped organ deep within the brain, is responsible for producing melatonin. The gland consists of pineal parenchymal cells and glial cells that can form neoplasms. Pineal region neoplasms can also arise from germ cells and adjacent structures. This review focuses on detection of serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of germ cell tumors and pineal parenchymal cell tumors, as these types comprise most neoplasms specific to the pineal region. Methods: For this review, we searched PubMed using the following keywords: biomarkers, germ cell tumor, germinoma, melatonin, pineal, pineal gland, pineal neoplasm, pinealoma, pineal parenchymal cell tumor, pineal region, and pineal tumor. We limited our search to full-text English articles and identified other relevant sources from the reference lists of identified articles. Results: Serum and CSF biomarker assays have a role in cases of suspected pineal germ cell or parenchymal neoplasms. Biomarkers including alpha-fetoprotein, beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, and placental alkaline phosphatase inform diagnosis and treatment and are important for monitoring germ cell tumor response to treatment. No biomarkers are currently available that inform diagnosis or treatment of pineal parenchymal tumors, although melatonin assays may have a role in monitoring response to treatment. Conclusion: Serum and CSF biomarkers in conjunction with clinical and radiographic evidence of a pineal region mass can inform the decision whether to undertake stereotactic biopsy or surgical excision or whether to proceed straight to medical treatment.

Histopathologic review of pineal parenchymal tumors identifies novel morphologic subtypes and prognostic factors for outcome

BACKGROUND

Pineal parenchymal tumors (PPTs) are rare neoplasms of the central nervous system, and data concerning clinical outcomes are limited. The purpose of this study was to define the clinical behavior of PPT according to current histopathologic criteria and identify prognostic factors to guide therapeutic decisions.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients treated for PPT at a single institution between 1992 and 2015 were retrospectively identified. Forty-five resection specimens were available and re-reviewed. Freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 4.1 years. All patients initially underwent surgery; 78% of patients with PPT of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) and all patients with pineoblastoma received adjuvant therapy. Pathologic re-review refined classification in 27% of cases, with the majority of these being adult patients with pineal tumors originally classified as pineoblastomas that more accurately resembled PPTID based on the 2007 WHO classification.

CLASSIFICATION

Our histologic review also identified that PPTIDs can be classified into small-cell and large-cell morphologic subtypes, which have distinct clinical outcomes. Tumor grade, extent of resection, and neuraxis spread were prognostic for FFP. PPTID subtype, extent of resection, and neuraxis spread were prognostic for OS. Genetic analysis of a pineoblastoma case identified somatic mutations of DICER1, ARID1A, and KDM5C genes.

CONCLUSIONS

PPTIDs can be classified into 1 of 2 novel morphologic subtypes that are associated with distinct clinical outcomes. Tumor grade, neuraxis spread, and extent of resection also influence outcome for patients with PPT.

A need for cautious interpretation of elevated serum germ cell tumor markers in children. Review and own experiences

Protocols for pediatric germ cell tumors (GCT) allow for chemotherapy (CHT) initiation without histological diagnosis, based on typical clinical and radiological picture and increased alphafetoprotein (AFP) or beta-human chorionic gonadotropin serum levels. Such strategy may result in misdiagnoses in rare cases. We present two patients with abdominal tumors and high serum AFP levels, diagnosed as GCT. In both, no tumor shrinkage and increasing AFP was observed after first cycles of multidrug CHT for pediatric GCT. Histological examination of biopsied tumor tissues revealed metastatic cholangiocarcinoma in patient 1 and pancreatoblastoma in patient 2, which implicated immediate change of therapy. Presented cases support the necessity to consider the tumor biopsy when patients diagnosed with GCT based on typical clinical presentation and elevated AFP do not respond to CHT with AFP decrease and tumor size reduction.