Neurofibromatosis type 2: Hearing preservation and rehabilitation

Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type 2: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Management of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2)- associated vestibular schwannomas (VSs) is challenging due to their multiplicity, early onset, proximity to the brainstem, unpredictable growth, and aggressive behavior. The optimal therapeutic intervention remains controversial in the literature, and the advantages and disadvantages of each treatment option should be evaluated for each patient. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has exhibited favorable results in the management of NF2-associated VSs. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the role of SRS in NF2-associated VSs.

METHODS

On August 22, 2024, four electronic databases, comprising PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, were comprehensively searched. Studies that assessed SRS's radiological and clinical outcomes in NF2-associated VSs were enrolled.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were included with 960 individuals and 1310 NF2-associated VSs. The analysis showed a pooled local control (LC) rate of 83% (95%CI:74-90%). Older age (P = 0.001), prior resection (P = 0.003), and lower tumor volume (P = 0.019) were associated with higher LC rates. The results demonstrated a pooled serviceable hearing preservation (SHP) rate of 42% (95%CI:34-51%), trigeminal nerve worsening rate of 2% (95%CI:1-4%), and a facial nerve worsening rate of 5% (95%CI:2-9%). None of the patients experienced radionecrosis (RN) following SRS. Sensitivity analyses revealed a moderate to high robustness of the results. No publication bias was identified.

CONCLUSION

SRS is an effective therapeutic modality for managing VSs, especially small-to medium-sized lesions. We showed that SRS is associated with favorable LC and SHP rates and considerably low trigeminal or facial nerve worsening and RN rates.

Long-term analysis of ABI auditory performance in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis

PURPOSE

This retrospective monocentric study aimed to evaluate long-term auditory brainstem implant (ABI) function in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2, and to investigate the prognostic factors for ABI use.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2022, 27 patients with at least five years of follow-up underwent implantation with 32 ABIs. At 1- and 5-years post-implantation and at last follow-up, ABIs were classified as used or non-used and the size of the ipsilateral tumor was recorded. For patients who used their ABIs, we assessed speech perception (disyllabic words, MBAA sentences) in quiet conditions with the ABI only, by lip-reading (LR), and with a combination of the two (ABI + LR). Hearing improvement was calculated as Δ ABI = (ABI + LR)-LR scores. Predictive factors for ABI use were analyzed.

RESULTS

One year post-implantation, 74% patients were ABI-users and 66% of the ABIs were used. Two of these patients were non-users at five years, and another two at last follow-up (14 ± 5.2 years); 54% of the patients were ABI-users at last follow-up. Δ ABI revealed a hearing improvement of 32-41% (disyllabic words) and 28-37% (MBAA sentences). Among 16 ABIs with at least LR improvement at 1-year post-implantation, 4 decreased their performance, coinciding with a large growing ipsilateral tumor in 3/4 ABIs. We identified no significant prognostic factors for ABI use.

CONCLUSIONS

ABIs are indicated in case of bilateral deafness with a non-functional cochlear nerve. Half the patients with ABIs used their implants and auditory performance remained stable over time, except in cases of ipsilateral tumor growth.

Cochlear Implantation in Neurofibromatosis Type 2-Related Schwannomatosis: Long-Term Hearing Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term hearing outcomes following cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and ipsilateral vestibular schwannoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary general hospital.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients undergoing cochlear implantation between 2004 and 2018 with at least 1 year of follow-up were included. Patients were categorized as "users" or "nonusers" of their cochlear implant (CI). For users, speech perception (disyllabic words) without lip-reading was assessed in quiet conditions 1-year postimplantation, and annually thereafter. CI users were classified into 2 groups on the basis of speech intelligibility (≥40% or <40%). Demographic data, treatment options, and tumor size were also recorded.

RESULTS

One year after implantation, 16 (73%) patients used their CI daily. Twelve of these patients had a speech intelligibility ≥40% (mean: 74 ± 21.9%). Three had a Koos stage IV tumor. At the last visit (mean duration of follow-up: 6 ± 5 years), 12 of these 16 patients were still using their implant daily, and 6 had a speech intelligibility ≥40%. No predictive factors for good performance at 1 year or performance stability were identified.

CONCLUSION

Neurofibromatosis type 2 is a complex disease profoundly affecting patient quality of life, and cochlear implantation should always be considered on a case-by-case basis. In some individuals, cochlear implantation can provide good speech intelligibility for extended periods, even posttreatment or in cases of large tumors.

Tumors of the nervous system and hearing loss: Beyond vestibular schwannomas

Hearing loss is a common side effect of many tumor treatments. However, hearing loss can also occur as a direct result of certain tumors of the nervous system, the most common of which are the vestibular schwannomas (VS). These tumors arise from Schwann cells of the vestibulocochlear nerve and their main cause is the loss of function of NF2, with 95 % of cases being sporadic and 5 % being part of the rare neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2)-related Schwannomatosis. Genetic variations in NF2 do not fully explain the clinical heterogeneity of VS, and interactions between Schwann cells and their microenvironment appear to be critical for tumor development. Preclinical in vitro and in vivo models of VS are needed to develop prognostic biomarkers and targeted therapies. In addition to VS, other tumors can affect hearing. Meningiomas and other masses in the cerebellopontine angle can compress the vestibulocochlear nerve due to their anatomic proximity. Gliomas can disrupt several neurological functions, including hearing; in fact, glioblastoma multiforme, the most aggressive subtype, may exhibit early symptoms of auditory alterations. Besides, treatments for high-grade tumors, including chemotherapy or radiotherapy, as well as incomplete resections, can induce long-term auditory dysfunction. Because hearing loss can have an irreversible and dramatic impact on quality of life, it should be considered in the clinical management plan of patients with tumors, and monitored throughout the course of the disease.

Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy Compared to Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma in Patients with Type 2 Neurofibromatosis

BACKGROUND

The use of radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of vestibulocochlear schwannomas is standard in patients with type 2 neurofibromatosis (NF2). In the general population, fractionated RT (FRT) can achieve good results compared to single-dose radiosurgery (SRS). We aimed to assess whether this is true for NF2 patients as well.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 34 patients and 54 lesions treated between 2010 and 2023 in a single university hospital.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patient charts were assessed. The median follow-up was 62.6 months (range, 7.1-135.8 months). Lesion size (median larger diameter, 2.5 cm) was correlated with the use of FRT (P > 0.001). Younger age also was correlated with FRT (P = 0.006). Median overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were not reached. The overall control rate was 76.5%, and the mean PFS was 49.8 months, compared with . 90.5% and 57.2 months, respectively, for SRS and 66.7% and 44.9 months, respectively, for FRT. There were no differences between the 2 groups in hearing loss, tinnitus, and facial palsy.

CONCLUSIONS

In the NF2 population, FRT may yield worse control rates than SRS. Whenever possible, it is preferable to not fractionate treatment for these patients. Nevertheless, the FRT results were still good. More and larger prospective trials are warranted.

Hearing Rehabilitation in Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 2: The Quebec's Experience With Auditory Implants

OBJECTIVE

To review a single-center experience with hearing rehabilitation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and to describe the auditory outcomes of cochlear implants (CIs) and auditory brainstem implants (ABI) in this population.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Twelve adult patients with NF2 who received a CI (n = 10) and/or an ABI (n = 5) between 2000 and 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Insertion of a CI and/or an ABI in NF2 patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VSs).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients' demographic data, treatment history, hearing evolution, hearing rehabilitation methods, implant details, and auditory outcomes after implantation.

RESULTS

Among those who received a CI, five patients had a stable untreated VS, one patient underwent a cochlear nerve preserving surgery, and four patients received radiotherapy treatments. Six patients became regular users of their device. The median open-set sentence recognition scores were as follows: 0.5% preoperatively, 60% at 1 year postoperatively, and 80% on the most recent audiological evaluation. All patients with an ABI were implanted concomitantly with VS surgical excision, and three of them also received radiotherapy treatments. The median open-set sentence recognition scores were as follows: 4% preoperatively, 26% at 1 year postoperatively, and 0% on the most recent evaluation. Three patients became regular ABI users.

CONCLUSION

Despite major technological advances, auditory outcomes with ABIs remain deceiving. Considering the overall improvement in postoperative auditory performances provided by CIs compared with ABIs, cochlear implantation standouts as a primary mean of hearing rehabilitation in NF2 patients.

Hearing Aid in Vestibular-Schwannoma-Related Hearing Loss: A Review

(1) Background: Several types of hearing aids are available for the rehabilitation of vestibular-schwannoma (VS)-related hearing loss. There is a lack of recently published papers regarding this theme. The aim of the present work is to organize current knowledge. (2) Methods: A review of the literature regarding the topics "vestibular schwannoma", "hearing loss", and "hearing aid" was performed. Nineteen studies were thus considered. (3) Results: Conventional hearing aids, contralateral routing of signal (CROS) aids, bone anchored hearing aids (BAHA), and others are available options for hearing rehabilitation in VS patients. The speech discrimination score (SDS) is considered the best measure to assess candidacy for rehabilitation with hearing aids. The best hearing rehabilitative conditions in VS patients when using conventional hearing aid devices are a mild-moderate hearing loss degree with good word recognition (more than 50% SDS). CROS-Aid and BAHA are reported to be beneficial. CROS-Aid expands on the area of receiving hearing. BAHA aids use direct bone-conduction stimulation. Unfortunately, there are no available studies focused specifically on VS patients that compare CROS and BAHA technologies. (4) Conclusions: Hearing aids, CROS, and BAHA are viable options for rehabilitating hearing impairment in VS, but require an accurate case-by-case audiological evaluation for rehabilitating hearing impairment in VS. Further studies are needed to prove if what is currently known about similar hearing illnesses can be confirmed, particularly in the case of VS.

Tumor Control and Hearing Preservation After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas in Neurofibromatosis Type 2-A Retrospective Analysis of 133 Tumors

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted with the aim to estimate long-term tumor control and hearing preservation rates in patients with neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2)-related vestibular schwannoma (VS), document retreatment success rate, and assess the associated predictive factors.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients with NF2-associated VS who underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) between 2009 and 2020 and had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Loss of tumor control was defined as greater than 10% increase in volume in more than one follow-up imaging or the need for retreatment in the form of repeat GKRS or surgery. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate actuarial tumor control and hearing preservation rates.

RESULTS

In total, 85 patients with 133 VSs were included in the study. The mean age was 29.8 years. In total, 57 tumors showed tumor regression, 35 showed stable disease, and 23 progressed in size at last follow up. Actuarial tumor control rates after 1, 3, 5, and 9 years were 95%, 79%, 75%, and 55%, respectively, with overall tumor control rate being 85%. Hearing worsened in 39 patients, and facial nerve dysfunction occurred in 4 patients. Five tumors underwent retreatment with GKRS at a median duration of 27.6 months (19-36 months) following the first GKRS.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest radiosurgical series of NF2-associated VS reported to date. GKRS provides a high rate of long-term local tumor control with a low risk of neurologic deprivation for patients with these tumors. The need for retreatment with GKRS, although low, is associated with good tumor control and lesser complications.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is characterized by often bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VS) that result in progressive hearing loss and compression of nearby brainstem structures causing cranial nerve palsies. Treatment of these tumors remains challenging, as both surgical removal and expectant management can result in symptom progression. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been investigated for the management of NF2-associated VS; however, the role, promises, and pitfalls of this treatment modality remain unclear.

METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Reviews were searched for studies assessing SRS outcome in NF2-associated VS only. Primary endpoints included tumor control, serviceable hearing, presence of tinnitus, and cranial nerve V and VII symptoms.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies (589 patients harboring 750 tumors) were analyzed. Clinical tumor control was achieved in 88% of cases (95% CI 80-95%); salvage surgery was needed in 8% (95% CI 4-13%) of cases. Treatment resulted in a worsening of pre-treatment serviceable hearing (OR = 0.26, p < 0.01), increased facial nerve (OR = 1.62, p < 0.01) and trigeminal nerve (OR = 1.42, p = 0.07) impairment. The incidence of vestibular symptoms and hydrocephalus were not consistently reported and thus could not be assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of NF2-associated VS continues to pose a challenge, as current SRS regimens result in impaired hearing and worse cranial nerve comorbidities, despite achieving high tumor control. It remains unclear if these findings have to be regarded as treatment complications or, rather, continued disease progression.

Translabyrinthine resection of NF2 associated vestibular schwannoma with cochlear implant insertion

The authors present the case of a 24-year-old female with neurofibromatosis type 2. Growth of the left vestibular schwannoma and progressive hearing loss prompted the decision to proceed to translabyrinthine resection with cochlear nerve preservation and cochlear implant insertion. Complete resection with preservation of the facial and cochlear nerves was achieved. The patient had grade 1 facial function and was discharged on postoperative day 4 following suturing of a minor CSF leak. This case highlights the feasibility of cochlear nerve preservation and cochlear implant insertion in appropriately selected patients, offering a combination of effective tumor control and hearing rehabilitation.

The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2021.7.FOCVID21122

Patient Report of Hearing in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Recommendations for Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate published patient-reported outcome measures for the assessment of hearing function and hearing-related quality of life (QoL) and recommend measures selected by the Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis International Collaboration (REiNS) as endpoints for clinical trials in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2).

METHODS

The REiNS Patient-Reported Outcomes Working Group systematically evaluated published patient-reported outcome measures of (1) hearing function and (2) hearing-related QoL for individuals with hearing loss of various etiologies using previously published REiNS rating procedures. Ten measures of hearing functioning and 11 measures of hearing-related QoL were reviewed. Measures were numerically scored and compared primarily on their participant characteristics (including participant age range and availability of normative data), item content, psychometric properties, and feasibility for use in clinical trials.

RESULTS

The Self-Assessment of Communication and the Self-Assessment of Communication-Adolescent were identified as most useful for adult and pediatric populations with NF2, respectively, for the measurement of both hearing function and hearing-related QoL. Measures were selected for their strengths in participant characteristics, item content, psychometric properties, and feasibility for use in clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

REiNS recommends the Self-Assessment of Communication adult and adolescent forms for the assessment of patient-reported hearing function and hearing-related QoL for NF2 clinical trials. Further work is needed to demonstrate the utility of these measures in evaluating pharmacologic or behavioral interventions.

Current Management of Large Vestibular Schwannomas for NF2 Patients in a National Reference Center

OBJECTIVE

Recently, treatment decision making for large vestibular schwannomas (VS) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) has become increasingly challenging due to the availability of multiple therapeutic options including surgery, bevacizumab (an anti-VEGF), radiosurgery, and observation; and it often remains an arbitrary decision based on local practices without firm recommendations. Our objective is to discuss the multimodal treatment options for Koos IV VS in a national reference center for NF2.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-institution retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

All NF2 patients with Koos IV VS who visited our center, the National Reference Center for NF2 Rare Disease in Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital of Paris, between January 2016 and December 2018 were included. Clinical charts, radiology, operative reports, and audiograms were reviewed.

RESULTS

Among 54 NF2 patients with Koos IV VS (mean maximum extrameatal diameter: 34 mm; range:17-62 mm), 27 were operated on for 28 VS; 21 were treated with bevacizumab; and six were observed. In the surgical group, VS resections were gross total, near-total, subtotal, or partial in 32%, 25%, 32%, and 11%, respectively; and a good (House-Brackmann grades I-II) facial nerve function was achieved in 81.5% at 1 year. Hearing was preserved in 14%, 78%, and 66% of the surgical (n = 7), bevacizumab (n = 9), and observation (n = 3) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

All therapeutic options, including surgery and/or bevacizumab and occasionally observation, should be proposed to NF2 patients with large VS in the setting of dedicated centers. A decision-making tree is proposed for Koos IV VS management based on tumor evolution, hearing and clinical status of the patient, and contralateral VS size.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4, case series study, historically controlled study Laryngoscope, 131:E98-E107, 2021.

Therapy of Sporadic and NF2-Related Vestibular Schwannoma

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is a benign primary brain tumor that occurs sporadic or as part of a genetic syndrome. The most common cause is the mutation of the NF2 tumor suppressor gene that is involved in the production of the protein merlin. Merlin plays a role in cell growth and cell adhesion. In patients with NF2, the VSs arise bilaterally and coincide with other brain tumors. In sporadic VS, the tumor is typically unilateral and does not coincide in combination with other tumors. MRI is the standard imaging technique and can be used to assess the size and aspect of the tumor as well as the progression of disease. The preferred management of large VS in both VS types is surgery with or without adjuvant radiation. The management for the medium- or small-sized VS includes wait and scan, radiotherapy and/or surgery. This choice depends on the preference of the patient and institutional protocols. The outcomes of surgical and radiotherapy treatments are improving due to progress in surgical equipment/approaches, advances in radiation delivery techniques and dose optimizations protocols. The main purpose of the management of VS is preserving function as long as possible in combination with tumor control.

Metachronous Bilateral Vestibular Schwannomas

Bilateral vestibular schwannoma (BVS) is the hallmark of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), both of them being present at diagnosis. We report four cases of metachronous BVS, a contralateral intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas (VS) being visible 2 to 13 years after resection of a unilateral VS. NF2 workup was negative except in one case where two NF2 gene mutations were found in tumor analysis. These cases raise the questions of whether the contralateral VS occurred by chance and how to manage it on the only hearing ear. Otologists should be aware of this rare eventuality for decision making of the first unilateral VS. Laryngoscope, 131:E250-E254, 2021.

The emerging role of hearing loss rehabilitation in patients with vestibular schwannoma treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: literature review

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is currently the most common treatment for small- to medium-size vestibular schwannoma (VS). Despite favorable outcome, hearing deterioration still remains an underestimated problem, and the role of hearing rehabilitation is an underinvestigated topic. Among available technologies, cochlear implant (CI) should represent a valid alternative in sporadic VS with single-sided deafness and in neurofibromatosis (NF2) with bilateral profound hearing loss. A literature review of the current clinical data was performed searching scientific literature databases. From all of the articles found, 16 papers were selected. Forty-four subjects treated with radiosurgery (18 male, 19 female, and in 7 cases, sex were not specified; 43 NF2 and 1 sporadic VS) were included in the analysis. Epidemiological, clinical, tumor, treatment, and audiological data were collected. Clinical outcome at last follow-up showed an audiological improvement in 25 of the 44 patients. The audiological outcome was unchanged in 16 cases. Audiological deterioration was recorded in 3 cases. Severity of NF2 phenotype, long history of ipsilateral profound deafness before implantation, progressive tumor growth, and high radiation dose (20 and 40 Gy) were found in patients with a worst audiological outcome. Hearing rehabilitation can improve audiological results for VS patients following SRS in selected cases. Hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implant (CI) in SSD leads to partial restoration of binaural hearing with an improvement in speech comprehension in noise and in sound localization, and partial suppression of subjective incapacitating tinnitus. SRS followed by CI may represent in selected cases a potential emerging option in the management of these patients, aimed at improving their quality of life. Possible implications for the follow-up of these patients are still present, although partially resolved.