Positional cranial deformation in children: A plea for the efficacy of the cranial helmet in children

Helmet Therapy for Positional Plagiocephaly: A Systematic Review of the Tools Used to Diagnose, Offer Treatment Recommendations, and Assess Treatment Outcomes of the Condition

BACKGROUND

Positional plagiocephaly (PP) is an asymmetric deformation of the skull as a consequence of external forces acting on a normal and pliable skull. The prevalence of PP ranges between 19.6% and 46.6%. Treatment options for PP include repositioning, physical therapy, and helmet orthoses. Consensus regarding the treatment of PP remains elusive due to the condition's imprecise natural history, dissimilar diagnostic strategies, and unreliable data asserting treatments' efficacy. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review of the tools used to diagnose, suggest treatment strategies, and assess outcomes for PP.

METHODS

We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to query a variety of databases. A total of 444 articles were imported into Covidence, a screening and data extraction tool for conducting systematic reviews.

RESULTS

After a series of screenings, 60 articles met inclusion criteria and were reviewed in detail. The information was entered into a data extraction list consisting of 16 variables in the categories of general information, diagnostic strategies, treatment modalities, and treatment outcomes. Most articles reported retrospective case series, which yielded level 4 evidence. Only one article reported the results of a randomized and blinded outcomes assessment trial. Such article yielded level 1 evidence and was rated as high quality for allocation, concealment, and blinding of personnel.

CONCLUSION

The strategies used to diagnose and classify PP are a disparate list of measures most of which have no parallels making it impossible to offer treatment recommendations and generate generalizable knowledge.

[Multidisciplinary approach to treatment of positional cranial asymmetry in infants]

The prevalence of positional cranial asymmetry has significantly increased since the introduction of the "Back to Sleep" campaign. Some deformities require therapeutic measures, such as growth-guiding head prostheses. The diagnosis is based on the clinical features, a thorough clinical examination and measurement of the infant's head. Prevention includes early education of parents about alternative positioning methods. Early interventions such as positioning therapy and physiotherapy can be effective in mild cases. In severe cases, the use of growth-guiding orthoses is necessary. The treatment and timing are crucial as head growth is highest in the first year of life. Helmet treatment should be started early to achieve optimal results in order to achieve an improvement in the head shape and ear position. Multidisciplinary approaches including physiotherapy and osteopathy are essential.

Spinal manipulation and mobilisation in paediatrics - an international evidence-based position statement for physiotherapists

INTRODUCTION

An international taskforce of clinician-scientists was formed by specialty groups of World Physiotherapy - International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapists (IFOMPT) & International Organisation of Physiotherapists in Paediatrics (IOPTP) - to develop evidence-based practice position statements directing physiotherapists clinical reasoning for the safe and effective use of spinal manipulation and mobilisation for paediatric populations (<18 years) with varied musculoskeletal or non-musculoskeletal conditions.

METHOD

A three-stage guideline process using validated methodology was completed: 1. Literature review stage (one scoping review, two reviews exploring psychometric properties); 2. Delphi stage (one 3-Round expert Delphi survey); and 3. Refinement stage (evidence-to-decision summative analysis, position statement development, evidence gap map analyses, and multilayer review processes).

RESULTS

Evidence-based practice position statements were developed to guide the appropriate use of spinal manipulation and mobilisation for paediatric populations. All were predicated on clinicians using biopsychosocial clinical reasoning to determine when the intervention is appropriate.1. It is not recommended to perform:• Spinal manipulation and mobilisation on infants.• Cervical and lumbar spine manipulation on children.•Spinal manipulation and mobilisation on infants, children, and adolescents for non-musculoskeletal paediatric conditions including asthma, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, breastfeeding difficulties, cerebral palsy, infantile colic, nocturnal enuresis, and otitis media.2. It may be appropriate to treat musculoskeletal conditions including spinal mobility impairments associated with neck-back pain and neck pain with headache utilising:• Spinal mobilisation and manipulation on adolescents;• Spinal mobilisation on children; or• Thoracic manipulation on children for neck-back pain only.3. No high certainty evidence to recommend these interventions was available.Reports of mild to severe harms exist; however, risk rates could not be determined.

CONCLUSION

Specific directives to guide physiotherapists' clinical reasoning on the appropriate use of spinal manipulation or mobilisation were identified. Future research should focus on trials for priority conditions (neck-back pain) in children and adolescents, psychometric properties of key outcome measures, knowledge translation, and harms.

Nonsyndromic Craniofacial Disorders

We describe the investigation and management of select pediatric craniofacial disorders their recent advances. Positional plagiocephaly: The incidence of positional plagiocephaly has increased since the institution of the "safe to sleep" campaign to reduce sudden infant death syndrome. Positional plagiocephaly may be associated with underlying developmental delay. Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis: Treatment of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis depends on the age of the patient and the suture involved. Pediatric skull lesions: Management of skull lesions depends on histologic diagnosis. Some benign skull lesions are managed conservatively, whereas erosive and malignant lesions may require surgical excision, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or multimodality treatment.