Ho ML, Mansukhani SA, Brodsky MC. Prenatal or Perinatal Injury? Diagnosing the Cortically Blind Infant.
Am J Ophthalmol 2020;
211:56-62. [PMID:
31704229 DOI:
10.1016/j.ajo.2019.10.026]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Revised: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE
To document the association of prenatal brain disruption with secondary perinatal distress in children diagnosed as having cortical visual impairment (CVI).
DESIGN
Retrospective case series.
METHODS
Eight children with severe CVI and clinical history of perinatal events were included. Case histories and neuroimaging studies were reviewed. The main outcome measures were perinatal history, visual and neurologic findings, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
RESULTS
In our patient cohort, MR imaging showed signs of cortical dysgenesis leading to congenital brain malformations such as polymicrogyria consistent with a prenatal timing of CNS injury. Although subcortical white matter changes were common, signs of watershed injury to the visual cortex were absent, suggesting that the visual loss was attributable to a prenatal etiology with secondary birth complications.
CONCLUSION
Some children with CVI and a history of perinatal distress have prenatal dysgenesis of the developing brain. Therefore, a clinical history of perinatal hypoxia-ischemia is nonspecific and merits neuroimaging to identify antecedent brain malformations and timing of injury, which can influence patient diagnosis and management.
Collapse