1
|
Attali D, Tiennot T, Manuel TJ, Daniel M, Houdouin A, Annic P, Dizeux A, Haroche A, Dadi G, Henensal A, Moyal M, Le Berre A, Paolillo C, Charron S, Debacker C, Lui M, Lekcir S, Mancusi R, Gallarda T, Sharshar T, Sylla K, Oppenheim C, Cachia A, Tanter M, Aubry JF, Plaze M. Deep transcranial ultrasound stimulation using personalized acoustic metamaterials improves treatment-resistant depression in humans. Brain Stimul 2025; 18:1004-1014. [PMID: 40311843 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2025.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2025] [Accepted: 04/26/2025] [Indexed: 05/03/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuromodulation of deep brain regions has shown promise for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, it currently requires neurosurgical electrode implantation, posing significant risks and limiting widespread use while TRD affects around 100 million people worldwide. Low-intensity transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) could allow precise and non-invasive deep neuromodulation, provided that the challenge of the defocusing effects of the skull is tackled. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS Here, we present the development of a portable and neuronavigated TUS prototype based on the use of patient-specific metamaterials (metalens) that correct for skull-induced aberrations. We then present the first application of metalens-based Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation (mTUS) in TRD. The primary objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of mTUS targeting on individual level specific white matter tracts of the subcallosal cingulate involved in TRD. METHODS The safety and precision of this device was addressed through a series of numerical simulations and experimental measurements on ex vivo human skulls. Five participants with TRD were included in this open-label study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06085950) and underwent an intensive 5-day course of mTUS with a total of 25 sessions of 5 min each. RESULTS No serious adverse events occurred during the study. By day 5 of treatment, depression severity was reduced by an average of 60.9 % (range: [30 %-83.9 %]), and four out of five patients qualified as responders, with two of them in remission. CONCLUSIONS This study provides first-in-human evidence of the potential of mTUS as a precise, safe and effective non-invasive neuromodulation technique for neuropsychiatric disorders involving deep brain regions, offering a safer and more accessible alternative to invasive approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Attali
- Institute Physics for Medicine Paris, Inserm U1273, ESPCI Paris, PSL University, CNRS UMR 8063, 75015, Paris, France; S17-18 Adult Psychiatry Department, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, 75014, Paris, France; Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, Pôle Neuro, Sainte-Anne Hospital, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Tiennot
- Institute Physics for Medicine Paris, Inserm U1273, ESPCI Paris, PSL University, CNRS UMR 8063, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Thomas J Manuel
- Institute Physics for Medicine Paris, Inserm U1273, ESPCI Paris, PSL University, CNRS UMR 8063, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Maxime Daniel
- Institute Physics for Medicine Paris, Inserm U1273, ESPCI Paris, PSL University, CNRS UMR 8063, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Houdouin
- Institute Physics for Medicine Paris, Inserm U1273, ESPCI Paris, PSL University, CNRS UMR 8063, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Annic
- Institute Physics for Medicine Paris, Inserm U1273, ESPCI Paris, PSL University, CNRS UMR 8063, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Dizeux
- Institute Physics for Medicine Paris, Inserm U1273, ESPCI Paris, PSL University, CNRS UMR 8063, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Haroche
- S17-18 Adult Psychiatry Department, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, 75014, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, IMA-brain Team, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Ghita Dadi
- S17-18 Adult Psychiatry Department, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Adèle Henensal
- Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, IMA-brain Team, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Mylène Moyal
- Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, IMA-brain Team, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Alice Le Berre
- Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, IMA-brain Team, 75014, Paris, France; Department of Neuroradiology, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Cécile Paolillo
- S17-18 Adult Psychiatry Department, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, 75014, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, LaPsyDÉ, CNRS, F-75005, Paris, France
| | - Sylvain Charron
- Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, IMA-brain Team, 75014, Paris, France; Department of Neuroradiology, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Clément Debacker
- Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, IMA-brain Team, 75014, Paris, France; Department of Neuroradiology, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Maliesse Lui
- Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, IMA-brain Team, 75014, Paris, France; Department of Neuroradiology, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Sabrina Lekcir
- Clinical Research and Innovation Department, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Rosella Mancusi
- Clinical Research and Innovation Department, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Thierry Gallarda
- S17-18 Adult Psychiatry Department, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Tarek Sharshar
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, Pôle Neuro, Sainte-Anne Hospital, 75014, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Khaoussou Sylla
- Clinical Research and Innovation Department, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Catherine Oppenheim
- Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, IMA-brain Team, 75014, Paris, France; Department of Neuroradiology, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Arnaud Cachia
- Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, IMA-brain Team, 75014, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, LaPsyDÉ, CNRS, F-75005, Paris, France
| | - Mickael Tanter
- Institute Physics for Medicine Paris, Inserm U1273, ESPCI Paris, PSL University, CNRS UMR 8063, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Francois Aubry
- Institute Physics for Medicine Paris, Inserm U1273, ESPCI Paris, PSL University, CNRS UMR 8063, 75015, Paris, France.
| | - Marion Plaze
- S17-18 Adult Psychiatry Department, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, 75014, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, IMA-brain Team, 75014, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li Z, Zhou Z, Zhang X, Wang Y, Wang H, Li Y, Li X. A New Multi-Mode, High Pressure Portable Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation System. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2025; 72:1078-1084. [PMID: 39453805 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2024.3486748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is a promising non-invasive neuromodulation method for brain disorders. Commonly-used TUS systems in research include custom-built and commercial devices. Custom-built devices typically consist of traditional function generator, power amplifier, and ultrasound transducer. Due to cumbersome wiring and absence of dedicated control software, the operation of these devices is inconvenient. Commercial devices often have limited waveform modes and cannot perform ultrasound modulation with complex waveforms. These limitations limit the application of TUS technology by ordinary users. Therefore, we propose a portable TUS system with multiple modes and high acoustic pressure. METHODS The proposed portable TUS system utilizes a high-power multi-mode stimulator, and an ultrasound transducer with impedance matching module to achieve multiple modes and high acoustic pressure ultrasound neuromodulation. RESULTS The stimulator can output four types of waveforms: continuous pulse continuous stimulus (CPCS), intermittent pulse continuous stimulus (IPCS), continuous pulse intermittent stimulus (CPIS), and intermittent pulse intermittent stimulus (IPIS). When using a same transducer, it generates a peak negative pressure that is nearly identical to one produced by a commercial device. And compared to commercial transducer, the peak negative pressure of our transducer is significantly higher, reaching a maximum of 0.95 MPa. CONCLUSION In-vitro experiments were conducted using rat hippocampal brain slices. The experimental results demonstrated the effectiveness of the TUS system for neural stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE It offers a design method of a portable multi-mode, high pressure TUS system, which is used for complex neural modulation research.
Collapse
|
3
|
Caffaratti H, Slater B, Shaheen N, Rhone A, Calmus R, Kritikos M, Kumar S, Dlouhy B, Oya H, Griffiths T, Boes AD, Trapp N, Kaiser M, Sallet J, Banks MI, Howard MA, Zanaty M, Petkov CI. Neuromodulation with Ultrasound: Hypotheses on the Directionality of Effects and Community Resource. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2025:2024.06.14.24308829. [PMID: 38947047 PMCID: PMC11213082 DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.14.24308829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Low-intensity Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation is a promising non-invasive technique for brain stimulation and focal neuromodulation. Research with humans and animal models has raised the possibility that TUS can be biased towards enhancing or suppressing neural function. Here, we first collate a set of hypotheses on the directionality of TUS effects and conduct an initial meta-analysis on the available healthy human participant TUS studies reporting stimulation parameters and outcomes (n = 47 studies, 52 experiments). In these initial exploratory analyses, we find that parameters such as the intensity and continuity of stimulation (duty cycle) with univariate tests show only statistical trends towards likely enhancement or suppressed of function with TUS. Multivariate machine learning analyses are currently limited by the small sample size. Given that human TUS sample sizes will continue to increase, predictability on the directionality of TUS effects could improve if this database can continue to grow as TUS studies more systematically explore the TUS stimulation parameter space and report outcomes. Therefore, we establish an inTUS database and resource for the systematic reporting of TUS parameters and outcomes to assist in greater precision in TUS use for brain stimulation and neuromodulation. The paper concludes with a selective review of human clinical TUS studies illustrating how hypotheses on the directionality of TUS effects could be developed for empirical testing in the intended clinical application, not limited to the examples provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo Caffaratti
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Ben Slater
- Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nour Shaheen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Ariane Rhone
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Ryan Calmus
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Michael Kritikos
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Sukhbinder Kumar
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Brian Dlouhy
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Oya
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Tim Griffiths
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Aaron D Boes
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Nicholas Trapp
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Marcus Kaiser
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jérôme Sallet
- Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute, INSERM U1208, University of Lyon, Lyon, France
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Matthew I Banks
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI, USA
| | - Matthew A Howard
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Mario Zanaty
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Christopher I Petkov
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Iowa Neuroscience Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang Z, Charalambous CC, Chen M, Kim T, Sokhadze E, Song A, Jung SH, Shekhar S, Feld JA, Jiang X, Feng W. Low intensity focused ultrasound stimulation in stroke: A phase I safety & feasibility trial. Brain Stimul 2025; 18:179-187. [PMID: 39842609 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2025.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2024] [Revised: 12/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2025] [Indexed: 01/24/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to determine the maximum safe spatial-peak pulse-average intensity (ISPPA) of low-intensity focused ultrasound stimulation (LIFUS) in stroke patients and explore its effect on motor learning and corticospinal excitability. METHODS We adopted the classic 3 + 3 design to escalate ISPPA (estimated in-vivo transcranial value) from 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, to 8 W/cm2. Stopping rules were pre-defined: 2nd-degree scalp burn, clinical seizure, new lesion on diffusion-weighted imaging or major reduction in apparent diffusion coefficient, and participant discontinuation due to any reason. We applied 12-min LIFUS over the ipsilesional motor cortex while participants were concurrently practicing 3 blocks of a motor sequence learning (MSL) task using the affected hand. We measured MSL (response time) and corticospinal excitability (motor evoked potential) pre- and post-stimulation and compared MSL and corticospinal excitability between the LOW (0, 1, and 2 W/cm2) and HIGH (4, 6, and 8 W/cm2) groups. RESULTS ISPPA was escalated to 8 W/cm2 with 18 stroke participants without meeting the stopping rules. Compared to the LOW, more participants in the HIGH performed better on MSL (6/9 vs. 0/9, p = 0.009) and showed a sign of greater corticospinal excitability (7/9 vs. 5/9, p = 0.62). INTERPRETATION Our phase-I safety study suggests that one session of LIFUS up to 8 W/cm2 ISPPA is safe and feasible in stroke patients, and LIFUS at high intensity induces positive changes in both MSL and corticospinal excitability. The next logical step is to conduct a phase-II trial testing the efficacy of LIFUS and continuously monitoring its safety profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziping Huang
- Department of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, USA
| | | | - Mengyue Chen
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, USA
| | - Taewon Kim
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Penn State College of Medicine, USA; Department of Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University, USA
| | - Estate Sokhadze
- Department of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Allen Song
- Duke Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Sin-Ho Jung
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Shashank Shekhar
- Department of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Jody A Feld
- Department of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Xiaoning Jiang
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, USA
| | - Wuwei Feng
- Department of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stanley Chen KH, Jacinta Kuo YC, Cheng CY, Dong YS, Fomenko A, Nankoo JF, Liu YP, Chen R. Interactive effect between transcranial focused ultrasound and transcranial magnetic stimulation on human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 167:92-105. [PMID: 39305793 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 09/03/2024] [Indexed: 11/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Transcranial focused ultrasound (TUS) can suppress human motor cortical excitability. However, it is unclear whether the TUS may interact with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) when they co-delivered in multiple trials. METHODS Nineteen subjects received three different TUS-TMS co-stimulation protocols to the motor cortex including concurrent stimulation (TUS-TMS-C), separated stimulation (TUS-TMS-S), and TMS only. In each condition, two runs of 30 stimulation trials were conducted with a five-minute rest between runs. Motor-evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded during stimulation and at 0, 10, 20, and 30 min after stimulation. The MEP amplitudes after intervention were normalized to the mean pre-intervention MEP amplitude and expressed as MEP ratios. An additional test with TUS alone was applied to all participants to assess whether TUS itself can elicit after-effects. RESULTS There were no significant after-effects of all three interventions on MEP ratios. However, 11 subjects who showed online inhibition (OI + ) during the TUS-TMS-C protocol, defined as having MEP ratio less than 1 during TUS-TMS-C, showed significant MEP suppression at 10, 20 and 30 min after TUS-TMS-C. In 8 subjects did not show online inhibition (OI-), defined as having MEP ratios greater than 1 during TUS-TMS-C, showed no significant inhibitory after-effects. OI + and OI- status did not change in a follow-up repeat TUS-TMS-C test. TUS alone did not generate inhibitory after-effects in either OI + or OI- participants. CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that co-delivery of TUS and TMS can elicit inhibitory after-effect in subjects who showed online inhibition, suggesting that TUS and TMS may interact with each other to produce plasticity effects. SIGNIFICANCE TUS and TMS may interact with each other to modulate cortical excitability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Hsiang Stanley Chen
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
| | - Yih-Chih Jacinta Kuo
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Chang-Yu Cheng
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Yan-Siou Dong
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Anton Fomenko
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Yi-Ping Liu
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Robert Chen
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cizmeci MN, Sarica C, Kalish BT, Lozano AM, Chen R. Neuromodulation using transcranial focused ultrasonography in neonates with perinatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Med Hypotheses 2024; 191:111463. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2024.111463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
7
|
Kop BR, Shamli Oghli Y, Grippe TC, Nandi T, Lefkes J, Meijer SW, Farboud S, Engels M, Hamani M, Null M, Radetz A, Hassan U, Darmani G, Chetverikov A, den Ouden HEM, Bergmann TO, Chen R, Verhagen L. Auditory confounds can drive online effects of transcranial ultrasonic stimulation in humans. eLife 2024; 12:RP88762. [PMID: 39190585 PMCID: PMC11349300 DOI: 10.7554/elife.88762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Transcranial ultrasonic stimulation (TUS) is rapidly emerging as a promising non-invasive neuromodulation technique. TUS is already well-established in animal models, providing foundations to now optimize neuromodulatory efficacy for human applications. Across multiple studies, one promising protocol, pulsed at 1000 Hz, has consistently resulted in motor cortical inhibition in humans (Fomenko et al., 2020). At the same time, a parallel research line has highlighted the potentially confounding influence of peripheral auditory stimulation arising from TUS pulsing at audible frequencies. In this study, we disentangle direct neuromodulatory and indirect auditory contributions to motor inhibitory effects of TUS. To this end, we include tightly matched control conditions across four experiments, one preregistered, conducted independently at three institutions. We employed a combined transcranial ultrasonic and magnetic stimulation paradigm, where TMS-elicited motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) served as an index of corticospinal excitability. First, we replicated motor inhibitory effects of TUS but showed through both tight controls and manipulation of stimulation intensity, duration, and auditory masking conditions that this inhibition was driven by peripheral auditory stimulation, not direct neuromodulation. Furthermore, we consider neuromodulation beyond driving overall excitation/inhibition and show preliminary evidence of how TUS might interact with ongoing neural dynamics instead. Primarily, this study highlights the substantial shortcomings in accounting for the auditory confound in prior TUS-TMS work where only a flip-over sham and no active control was used. The field must critically reevaluate previous findings given the demonstrated impact of peripheral confounds. Furthermore, rigorous experimental design via (in)active control conditions is required to make substantiated claims in future TUS studies. Only when direct effects are disentangled from those driven by peripheral confounds can TUS fully realize its potential for research and clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin R Kop
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Yazan Shamli Oghli
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network; University of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Talyta C Grippe
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network; University of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Tulika Nandi
- Neuroimaging Center; Johannes-Gutenberg University Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
| | - Judith Lefkes
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Sjoerd W Meijer
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Soha Farboud
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Marwan Engels
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Michelle Hamani
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network; University of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Melissa Null
- Neuroimaging Center; Johannes-Gutenberg University Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
| | - Angela Radetz
- Neuroimaging Center; Johannes-Gutenberg University Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
| | - Umair Hassan
- Neuroimaging Center; Johannes-Gutenberg University Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
| | - Ghazaleh Darmani
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network; University of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Andrey Chetverikov
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
- Department of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of BergenBergenNorway
| | - Hanneke EM den Ouden
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Til Ole Bergmann
- Neuroimaging Center; Johannes-Gutenberg University Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research MainzMainzGermany
| | - Robert Chen
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network; University of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Lennart Verhagen
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lefaucheur JP, Moro E, Shirota Y, Ugawa Y, Grippe T, Chen R, Benninger DH, Jabbari B, Attaripour S, Hallett M, Paulus W. Clinical neurophysiology in the treatment of movement disorders: IFCN handbook chapter. Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 164:57-99. [PMID: 38852434 PMCID: PMC11418354 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
In this review, different aspects of the use of clinical neurophysiology techniques for the treatment of movement disorders are addressed. First of all, these techniques can be used to guide neuromodulation techniques or to perform therapeutic neuromodulation as such. Neuromodulation includes invasive techniques based on the surgical implantation of electrodes and a pulse generator, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) or spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on the one hand, and non-invasive techniques aimed at modulating or even lesioning neural structures by transcranial application. Movement disorders are one of the main areas of indication for the various neuromodulation techniques. This review focuses on the following techniques: DBS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and focused ultrasound (FUS), including high-intensity magnetic resonance-guided FUS (MRgFUS), and pulsed mode low-intensity transcranial FUS stimulation (TUS). The main clinical conditions in which neuromodulation has proven its efficacy are Parkinson's disease, dystonia, and essential tremor, mainly using DBS or MRgFUS. There is also some evidence for Tourette syndrome (DBS), Huntington's disease (DBS), cerebellar ataxia (tDCS), and axial signs (SCS) and depression (rTMS) in PD. The development of non-invasive transcranial neuromodulation techniques is limited by the short-term clinical impact of these techniques, especially rTMS, in the context of very chronic diseases. However, at-home use (tDCS) or current advances in the design of closed-loop stimulation (tACS) may open new perspectives for the application of these techniques in patients, favored by their easier use and lower rate of adverse effects compared to invasive or lesioning methods. Finally, this review summarizes the evidence for keeping the use of electromyography to optimize the identification of muscles to be treated with botulinum toxin injection, which is indicated and widely performed for the treatment of various movement disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
- Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France; EA 4391, ENT Team, Paris-Est Créteil University, Créteil, France.
| | - Elena Moro
- Grenoble Alpes University, Division of Neurology, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neuroscience, Grenoble, France
| | - Yuichiro Shirota
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Ugawa
- Department of Human Neurophysiology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Talyta Grippe
- Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Neuroscience Graduate Program, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert Chen
- Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David H Benninger
- Service of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Bahman Jabbari
- Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sanaz Attaripour
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Mark Hallett
- Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Walter Paulus
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pellow C, Pichardo S, Pike GB. A systematic review of preclinical and clinical transcranial ultrasound neuromodulation and opportunities for functional connectomics. Brain Stimul 2024; 17:734-751. [PMID: 38880207 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-intensity transcranial ultrasound has surged forward as a non-invasive and disruptive tool for neuromodulation with applications in basic neuroscience research and the treatment of neurological and psychiatric conditions. OBJECTIVE To provide a comprehensive overview and update of preclinical and clinical transcranial low intensity ultrasound for neuromodulation and emphasize the emerging role of functional brain mapping to guide, better understand, and predict responses. METHODS A systematic review was conducted by searching the Web of Science and Scopus databases for studies on transcranial ultrasound neuromodulation, both in humans and animals. RESULTS 187 relevant studies were identified and reviewed, including 116 preclinical and 71 clinical reports with subjects belonging to diverse cohorts. Milestones of ultrasound neuromodulation are described within an overview of the broader landscape. General neural readouts and outcome measures are discussed, potential confounds are noted, and the emerging use of functional magnetic resonance imaging is highlighted. CONCLUSION Ultrasound neuromodulation has emerged as a powerful tool to study and treat a range of conditions and its combination with various neural readouts has significantly advanced this platform. In particular, the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging has yielded exciting inferences into ultrasound neuromodulation and has the potential to advance our understanding of brain function, neuromodulatory mechanisms, and ultimately clinical outcomes. It is anticipated that these preclinical and clinical trials are the first of many; that transcranial low intensity focused ultrasound, particularly in combination with functional magnetic resonance imaging, has the potential to enhance treatment for a spectrum of neurological conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly Pellow
- Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.
| | - Samuel Pichardo
- Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - G Bruce Pike
- Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lee K, Park TY, Lee W, Kim H. A review of functional neuromodulation in humans using low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound. Biomed Eng Lett 2024; 14:407-438. [PMID: 38645585 PMCID: PMC11026350 DOI: 10.1007/s13534-024-00369-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Transcranial ultrasonic neuromodulation is a rapidly burgeoning field where low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS), with exquisite spatial resolution and deep tissue penetration, is used to non-invasively activate or suppress neural activity in specific brain regions. Over the past decade, there has been a rapid increase of tFUS neuromodulation studies in healthy humans and subjects with central nervous system (CNS) disease conditions, including a recent surge of clinical investigations in patients. This narrative review summarized the findings of human neuromodulation studies using either tFUS or unfocused transcranial ultrasound (TUS) reported from 2013 to 2023. The studies were categorized into two separate sections: healthy human research and clinical studies. A total of 42 healthy human investigations were reviewed as grouped by targeted brain regions, including various cortical, subcortical, and deep brain areas including the thalamus. For clinical research, a total of 22 articles were reviewed for each studied CNS disease condition, including chronic pain, disorder of consciousness, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, depression, schizophrenia, anxiety disorders, substance use disorder, drug-resistant epilepsy, and stroke. Detailed information on subjects/cohorts, target brain regions, sonication parameters, outcome readouts, and stimulatory efficacies were tabulated for each study. In later sections, considerations for planning tFUS neuromodulation in humans were also concisely discussed. With an excellent safety profile to date, the rapid growth of human tFUS research underscores the increasing interest and recognition of its significant potential in the field of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), offering theranostic potential for neurological and psychiatric disease conditions and neuroscientific tools for functional brain mapping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyuheon Lee
- Bionics Research Center, Biomedical Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, 5 Hwarangro 14-gil, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02792 South Korea
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Tae Young Park
- Bionics Research Center, Biomedical Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, 5 Hwarangro 14-gil, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02792 South Korea
- Division of Bio-Medical Science and Technology, KIST School, Korea University of Science and Technology, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Wonhye Lee
- Bionics Research Center, Biomedical Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, 5 Hwarangro 14-gil, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02792 South Korea
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Hyungmin Kim
- Bionics Research Center, Biomedical Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, 5 Hwarangro 14-gil, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02792 South Korea
- Division of Bio-Medical Science and Technology, KIST School, Korea University of Science and Technology, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zadeh AK, Raghuram H, Shrestha S, Kibreab M, Kathol I, Martino D, Pike GB, Pichardo S, Monchi O. The effect of transcranial ultrasound pulse repetition frequency on sustained inhibition in the human primary motor cortex: A double-blind, sham-controlled study. Brain Stimul 2024; 17:476-484. [PMID: 38621645 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation hold promise for inducing brain plasticity. However, their limited precision may hamper certain applications. In contrast, Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation (TUS), known for its precision and deep brain targeting capabilities, requires further investigation to establish its efficacy in producing enduring effects for treating neurological and psychiatric disorders. OBJECTIVE To investigate the enduring effects of different pulse repetition frequencies (PRF) of TUS on motor corticospinal excitability. METHODS T1-, T2-weighted, and zero echo time magnetic resonance imaging scans were acquired from 21 neurologically healthy participants for neuronavigation, skull reconstruction, and the performance of transcranial ultrasound and thermal modelling. The effects of three different TUS PRFs (10, 100, and 1000 Hz) with a constant duty cycle of 10 % on corticospinal excitability in the primary motor cortex were assessed using TMS-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Each PRF and sham condition was evaluated on separate days, with measurements taken 5-, 30-, and 60-min post-TUS. RESULTS A significant decrease in MEP amplitude was observed with a PRF of 10 Hz (p = 0.007), which persisted for at least 30 min, and with a PRF of 100 Hz (p = 0.001), lasting over 60 min. However, no significant changes were found for the PRF of 1000 Hz and the sham conditions. CONCLUSION This study highlights the significance of PRF selection in TUS and underscores its potential as a non-invasive approach to reduce corticospinal excitability, offering valuable insights for future clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali K Zadeh
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | | | - Shirshak Shrestha
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Mekale Kibreab
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Iris Kathol
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Davide Martino
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - G Bruce Pike
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Samuel Pichardo
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Oury Monchi
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Radiology, Radio-oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montreal, QC, Canada; Centre de Recherche, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shamli Oghli Y, Grippe T, Arora T, Hoque T, Darmani G, Chen R. Mechanisms of theta burst transcranial ultrasound induced plasticity in the human motor cortex. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:1135-1143. [PMID: 37524296 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.07.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is a novel non-invasive brain stimulation technique with high depth penetrance and spatial resolution. Theta-burst TUS (tbTUS) is a plasticity-inducing protocol which increases motor cortical excitability for up to 30 min following 80s of sonication. While this protocol may have therapeutic potential for the treatment of psychiatric and neurological disorders, the mechanisms of action of TUS remain unclear. OBJECTIVE We conducted the first pharmacological study to examine the mechanisms of TUS in human primary motor cortex. By administering brain-active drugs with known mechanisms of action, we aimed to elucidate the mechanisms of tbTUS. METHODS Fourteen healthy subjects participated in a within-subjects randomized, double-blind, cross-over study with five visits. At each visit, one of four study drugs (carbamazepine - Na+ channel blocker, nimodipine - L-type Ca2+ channel blocker, lorazepam - positive allosteric modulator of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A receptor, dextromethorphan - N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist) or placebo was administered in random order, followed by tbTUS. RESULTS The plasticity effects of tbTUS on motor cortex excitability measured by motor-evoked potential amplitudes elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation were reduced by all study drugs compared to placebo. CONCLUSION tbTUS may induce NMDA-dependent synaptic plasticity since the effects are blocked by increased GABAA receptor activities and voltage-gated Na+ and Ca2+ channels blockers. These results are consistent with the hypotheses that tbTUS induced long-term potentiation-like mechanisms and that TUS involves activation of mechanosensitive Na+ and Ca2+ channels. Alternatively, non-specific pharmacologically induced changes in excitatory/inhibitory balance might have interfered with the effects of tbTUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yazan Shamli Oghli
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Talyta Grippe
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tarun Arora
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, Section for Clinical Neurophysiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tasnuva Hoque
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ghazaleh Darmani
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Robert Chen
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ren L, Zhai Z, Xiang Q, Zhuo K, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Jiao X, Tong S, Liu D, Sun J. Transcranial ultrasound stimulation modulates the interhemispheric balance of excitability in human motor cortex. J Neural Eng 2023; 20. [PMID: 36669203 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/acb50d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Background. Low-intensity transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) could induce both immediate and long-lasting neuromodulatory effects in human brains. Interhemispheric imbalance at prefrontal or motor cortices generally associates with various cognitive decline in aging and mental disorders. However, whether TUS could modulate the interhemispheric balance of excitability in human brain remains unknown.Objective. This study aims to explore whether repetitive TUS (rTUS) intervention can modulate the interhemispheric balance of excitability between bilateral motor cortex (M1) in healthy subjects.Approach. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) at bilateral M1 were measured at 15 min and 0 min before a 15 min active or sham rTUS intervention on left M1 and at 0 min, 15 min and 30 min after the intervention, and the Chinese version of brief neurocognitive test battery (C-BCT) was conducted before and after the intervention respectively. Cortical excitability was quantified by MEPs, and the long-lasting changes of MEP amplitude was used as an index of plasticity.Results. In the active rTUS group (n= 20), the ipsilateral MEP amplitude increased significantly compared with baselines and lasted for up to 30 min after intervention, while the contralateral MEP amplitude decreased lasting for 15 min, yielding increased laterality between bilateral MEPs. Furthermore, rTUS intervention induced changes in some C-BCT scores, and the changes of scores correlated with the changes of MEP amplitudes induced by rTUS intervention. The sham rTUS group (n= 20) showed no significant changes in MEPs and C-BCT scores. In addition, no participants reported any adverse effects during and after the rTUS intervention, and no obvious temperature increase appeared in skull or brain tissues in simulation.Significance. rTUS intervention modulated the plasticity of ipsilateral M1 and the interhemispheric balance of M1 excitability in human brain, and improved cognitive performance, suggesting a considerable potential of rTUS in clinical interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liyuan Ren
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200230, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhaolin Zhai
- First-episode Schizophrenia and Early Psychosis Program, Division of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiong Xiang
- First-episode Schizophrenia and Early Psychosis Program, Division of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, People's Republic of China
| | - Kaiming Zhuo
- First-episode Schizophrenia and Early Psychosis Program, Division of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, People's Republic of China
| | - Suzhen Zhang
- First-episode Schizophrenia and Early Psychosis Program, Division of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, People's Republic of China.,Department of Psychiatry, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi Zhang
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200230, People's Republic of China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiong Jiao
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200230, People's Republic of China
| | - Shanbao Tong
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200230, People's Republic of China.,Brain Science and Technology Research Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200230, People's Republic of China
| | - Dengtang Liu
- First-episode Schizophrenia and Early Psychosis Program, Division of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, People's Republic of China.,Department of Psychiatry, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, People's Republic of China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Mental Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, People's Republic of China
| | - Junfeng Sun
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200230, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Butler CR, Rhodes E, Blackmore J, Cheng X, Peach RL, Veldsman M, Sheerin F, Cleveland RO. Transcranial ultrasound stimulation to human middle temporal complex improves visual motion detection and modulates electrophysiological responses. Brain Stimul 2022; 15:1236-1245. [PMID: 36067978 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) holds promise as a novel technology for non-invasive neuromodulation, with greater spatial precision than other available methods and the ability to target deep brain structures. However, its safety and efficacy for behavioural and electrophysiological modulation remains controversial and it is not yet clear whether it can be used to manipulate the neural mechanisms supporting higher cognitive function in humans. Moreover, concerns have been raised about a potential TUS-induced auditory confound. OBJECTIVES We aimed to investigate whether TUS can be used to modulate higher-order visual function in humans in an anatomically-specific way whilst controlling for auditory confounds. METHODS We used participant-specific skull maps, functional localisation of brain targets, acoustic modelling and neuronavigation to guide TUS delivery to human visual motion processing cortex (hMT+) whilst participants performed a visual motion detection task. We compared the effects of hMT+ stimulation with sham and control site stimulation and examined EEG data for modulation of task-specific event-related potentials. An auditory mask was applied which prevented participants from distinguishing between stimulation and sham trials. RESULTS Compared with sham and control site stimulation, TUS to hMT+ improved accuracy and reduced response times of visual motion detection. TUS also led to modulation of the task-specific event-related EEG potential. The amplitude of this modulation correlated with the performance benefit induced by TUS. No pathological changes were observed comparing structural MRI obtained before and after stimulation. CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrate for the first time the precision, efficacy and safety of TUS for stimulation of higher-order cortex and cognitive function in humans whilst controlling for auditory confounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R Butler
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
| | - Edward Rhodes
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK; UK Dementia Research Institute, Imperial College London, UK
| | | | - Xinghao Cheng
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Robert L Peach
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK; Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Fintan Sheerin
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lescrauwaet E, Vonck K, Sprengers M, Raedt R, Klooster D, Carrette E, Boon P. Recent Advances in the Use of Focused Ultrasound as a Treatment for Epilepsy. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:886584. [PMID: 35794951 PMCID: PMC9251412 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.886584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Epilepsy affects about 1% of the population. Approximately one third of patients with epilepsy are drug-resistant (DRE). Resective surgery is an effective treatment for DRE, yet invasive, and not all DRE patients are suitable resective surgery candidates. Focused ultrasound, a novel non-invasive neurointerventional method is currently under investigation as a treatment alternative for DRE. By emitting one or more ultrasound waves, FUS can target structures in the brain at millimeter resolution. High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) leads to ablation of tissue and could therefore serve as a non-invasive alternative for resective surgery. It is currently under investigation in clinical trials following the approval of HIFU for essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease. Low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) can modulate neuronal activity and could be used to lower cortical neuronal hyper-excitability in epilepsy patients in a non-invasive manner. The seizure-suppressive effect of LIFU has been studied in several preclinical trials, showing promising results. Further investigations are required to demonstrate translation of preclinical results to human subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Lescrauwaet
- 4Brain Lab, Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Emma Lescrauwaet,
| | - Kristl Vonck
- 4Brain Lab, Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mathieu Sprengers
- 4Brain Lab, Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Robrecht Raedt
- 4Brain Lab, Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Debby Klooster
- 4Brain Lab, Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Evelien Carrette
- 4Brain Lab, Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Paul Boon
- 4Brain Lab, Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sarica C, Nankoo JF, Fomenko A, Grippe TC, Yamamoto K, Samuel N, Milano V, Vetkas A, Darmani G, Cizmeci MN, Lozano AM, Chen R. Human Studies of Transcranial Ultrasound neuromodulation: A systematic review of effectiveness and safety. Brain Stimul 2022; 15:737-746. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
|
17
|
Heimbuch IS, Fan TK, Wu AD, Faas GC, Charles AC, Iacoboni M. Ultrasound stimulation of the motor cortex during tonic muscle contraction. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0267268. [PMID: 35442956 PMCID: PMC9020726 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial ultrasound stimulation (tUS) shows potential as a noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) technique, offering increased spatial precision compared to other NIBS techniques. However, its reported effects on primary motor cortex (M1) are limited. We aimed to better understand tUS effects in human M1 by performing tUS of the hand area of M1 (M1hand) during tonic muscle contraction of the index finger. Stimulation during muscle contraction was chosen because of the transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced phenomenon known as cortical silent period (cSP), in which transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of M1hand involuntarily suppresses voluntary motor activity. Since cSP is widely considered an inhibitory phenomenon, it presents an ideal parallel for tUS, which has often been proposed to preferentially influence inhibitory interneurons. Recording electromyography (EMG) of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle, we investigated effects on muscle activity both during and after tUS. We found no change in FDI EMG activity concurrent with tUS stimulation. Using single-pulse TMS, we found no difference in M1 excitability before versus after sparsely repetitive tUS exposure. Using acoustic simulations in models made from structural MRI of the participants that matched the experimental setups, we estimated in-brain pressures and generated an estimate of cumulative tUS exposure experienced by M1hand for each subject. We were unable to find any correlation between cumulative M1hand exposure and M1 excitability change. We also present data that suggest a TMS-induced MEP always preceded a near-threshold cSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian S. Heimbuch
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Ahmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Tiffany K. Fan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Allan D. Wu
- Department of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Guido C. Faas
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Andrew C. Charles
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Marco Iacoboni
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Ahmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cain JA, Spivak NM, Coetzee JP, Crone JS, Johnson MA, Lutkenhoff ES, Real C, Buitrago-Blanco M, Vespa PM, Schnakers C, Monti MM. Ultrasonic Deep Brain Neuromodulation in Acute Disorders of Consciousness: A Proof-of-Concept. Brain Sci 2022; 12:428. [PMID: 35447960 PMCID: PMC9032970 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12040428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The promotion of recovery in patients who have entered a disorder of consciousness (DOC; e.g., coma or vegetative states) following severe brain injury remains an enduring medical challenge despite an ever-growing scientific understanding of these conditions. Indeed, recent work has consistently implicated altered cortical modulation by deep brain structures (e.g., the thalamus and the basal ganglia) following brain damage in the arising of, and recovery from, DOCs. The (re)emergence of low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) neuromodulation may provide a means to selectively modulate the activity of deep brain structures noninvasively for the study and treatment of DOCs. This technique is unique in its combination of relatively high spatial precision and noninvasive implementation. Given the consistent implication of the thalamus in DOCs and prior results inducing behavioral recovery through invasive thalamic stimulation, here we applied ultrasound to the central thalamus in 11 acute DOC patients, measured behavioral responsiveness before and after sonication, and applied functional MRI during sonication. With respect to behavioral responsiveness, we observed significant recovery in the week following thalamic LIFU compared with baseline. With respect to functional imaging, we found decreased BOLD signals in the frontal cortex and basal ganglia during LIFU compared with baseline. In addition, we also found a relationship between altered connectivity of the sonicated thalamus and the degree of recovery observed post-LIFU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josh A. Cain
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (J.P.C.); (J.S.C.); (M.A.J.); (E.S.L.)
| | - Norman M. Spivak
- Brain Injury Research Center (BIRC), Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (N.M.S.); (C.R.); (M.B.-B.); (P.M.V.)
- UCLA-Caltech Medical Scientist Training Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - John P. Coetzee
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (J.P.C.); (J.S.C.); (M.A.J.); (E.S.L.)
- Department of Psychiatry, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
- Palo Alto VA Medical Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Julia S. Crone
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (J.P.C.); (J.S.C.); (M.A.J.); (E.S.L.)
| | - Micah A. Johnson
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (J.P.C.); (J.S.C.); (M.A.J.); (E.S.L.)
| | - Evan S. Lutkenhoff
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (J.P.C.); (J.S.C.); (M.A.J.); (E.S.L.)
| | - Courtney Real
- Brain Injury Research Center (BIRC), Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (N.M.S.); (C.R.); (M.B.-B.); (P.M.V.)
| | - Manuel Buitrago-Blanco
- Brain Injury Research Center (BIRC), Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (N.M.S.); (C.R.); (M.B.-B.); (P.M.V.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Paul M. Vespa
- Brain Injury Research Center (BIRC), Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (N.M.S.); (C.R.); (M.B.-B.); (P.M.V.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Caroline Schnakers
- Research Institute, Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare, Pomona, CA 91767, USA;
| | - Martin M. Monti
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (J.P.C.); (J.S.C.); (M.A.J.); (E.S.L.)
- Brain Injury Research Center (BIRC), Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (N.M.S.); (C.R.); (M.B.-B.); (P.M.V.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Darmani G, Bergmann T, Butts Pauly K, Caskey C, de Lecea L, Fomenko A, Fouragnan E, Legon W, Murphy K, Nandi T, Phipps M, Pinton G, Ramezanpour H, Sallet J, Yaakub S, Yoo S, Chen R. Non-invasive transcranial ultrasound stimulation for neuromodulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2022; 135:51-73. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|