The bedside examination of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR): an update

Assessment of visual problems after acquired brain injury: a survey of current practice in Danish hospitals

OBJECTIVES

To explore current hospital practice in relation to the assessment of vision problems in patients with acquired brain injury.

DESIGN

A survey study.

SUBJECTS

A total of 143 respondents from hospital settings, with background in occupational therapy and physical therapy, participated in the survey.

METHODS

The survey questionnaire, developed collaboratively by Danish and Norwegian research groups, encompassed 22 items categorically covering "Background information", "Clinical experience and current practice", "Vision assessment tools and protocols", and "Assessment barriers". It was sent out online, to 29 different hospital departments and 18 separate units for occupational therapists and physiotherapists treating patients with acquired brain injury.

RESULTS

Most respondents worked in acute or subacute hospital settings. Few departments had an interdisciplinary vision team, and very few therapists had formal education in visual problems after acquired brain injury. Visual assessment practices varied, and there was limited use of standardized tests. Barriers to identifying visual problems included patient-related challenges, knowledge gaps, and resource limitations.

CONCLUSION

The study emphasized the need for enhanced interdisciplinary collaboration, formal education, and standardized assessments to address visual problems after acquired brain injury. Overcoming these challenges may improve identification and management, ultimately contributing to better patient care and outcomes in the future.

Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Effects on Vestibular Function: A Preliminary Report

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear receptors are sensitive to vibratory stimuli. Based on this sensibility, bone-anchored hearing aids have been introduced to correct unilateral or bilateral conductive or mixed hearing loss and unilateral deafness. The vestibular system is also sensitive to the vibratory stimulus and this type of response is used in clinics to test its functionality. Being aware of this double separated sensibility, we wondered whether bone vibration, which activates the acoustic receptors of patients with bone conduction aids, can also influence the functionality of the vestibular system.

METHODS

To this end, we recruited 12 patients with a bone-anchored hearing aid and evaluated their vestibular function with and without an activated vibratory acoustic device.

RESULTS

Our results show that the vibratory stimulus delivered by the bone conduction aid also reaches and stimulates the vestibular receptors; this stimulation is evidenced by the appearance or modification of some nystagmus findings during bedside vestibular testing. Despite this, none of these patients complained of dizziness or vertigo during prosthesis use. Nystagmus that appeared or changed during acoustic vibratory stimulation through the prosthesis was almost all predominantly horizontal, unidirectional with respect to gaze or body position, inhibited by fixation, and most often consistent with vestibular function tests indicating peripheral vestibular damage.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of sound-evoked nystagmus seem to indicate peripheral rather than central vestibular activation. The occurrence of some predominantly horizontal and high-frequency induced nystagmus seems to attribute the response mainly to the utricle and lateral semicircular canal.

Normative values for the video Head Impulse Test in children without otoneurologic symptoms and their evolution across childhood by gender

PURPOSE

The video Head Impulse Test is routinely used to assess semicircular canal function in adults, but to date, pediatric reference values are scarce. This study aimed to explore the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) in healthy children at different development stages and to compare the obtained gain values with reference to those in an adult population.

METHODS

This prospective, single-center study recruited 187 children from among patients without otoneurological diseases, healthy relatives of these patients, and staff families from a tertiary hospital. Patients were divided into three groups by age: 3-6 years, 7-10 years, and 11-16 years. The vestibulo-ocular reflex was assessed by video Head Impulse Test, using a device with a high-speed infrared camera and accelerometer (EyeSeeCam®; Interacoustics, Denmark).

RESULTS

We found a lower vestibulo-ocular reflex gain of both horizontal canals in the 3-6-year-old group when compared with the other age groups. No increasing trend was found in the horizontal canals from age 7-10 years to age 11-16 years, and no differences were found by sex.

CONCLUSION

Gain values in the horizontal canals increased with age until children reached age 7-10 years and matched the normal values for adults.

Pearls & Oy-sters: Vertical Diplopia and Ocular Torsion: Peripheral vs Central Localization

We describe a case with torsional deviation of the eyes from a brainstem lesion. Torsional eye movement refers to changes in the position of the eyes in the roll plane around the visual axis. When the head is tilted laterally (that is, rolled toward the shoulder), the eyes roll in the opposite direction as part of the torsional vestibulo-ocular reflex known as the ocular counter-roll. Pathologies that affect the otolith-ocular pathway can lead to a torsional deviation of the eyes as part of the ocular tilt reaction (OTR) that also causes vertical deviation of the eyes (skew deviation) and head tilt. Lesions caudal to the pontomedullary junction (such as the labyrinth, eighth cranial nerve, or vestibular nucleus) result in an OTR with ipsiversive torsional deviation, whereas lesions rostral to the junction result in an OTR with contraversive torsional deviation. Furthermore, torsional deviation of the eyes in the OTR is conjugate (incyclotorsion in the higher eye and excyclotorsion in the lower eye), whereas torsional deviation from ocular palsy in peripheral lesions is disconjugate (e.g., exyclotorsion only in the higher eye with superior oblique palsy). Therefore, the pattern of torsional eye deviation can be helpful in localizing the lesion. Several techniques including fundus photography, double Maddox rod testing, optical coherence tomography, and video-oculography are used to measure torsional eye position.

Enhanced Eye Velocity With Backup Saccades in vHIT Tests of a Menière Disease Patient: A Case Report

Reduced eye velocity and overt or covert compensatory saccades during horizontal head impulse testing are the signs of reduced vestibular function. However, here we report the unusual case of a patient who had enhanced eye velocity during horizontal head impulses followed by a corrective saccade. We term this saccade a "backup saccade" because it acts to compensate for the gaze position error caused by the enhanced velocity (and enhanced VOR gain) and acts to return gaze directly to the fixation target as shown by eye position records. We distinguish backup saccades from overt or covert compensatory saccades or the anticompensatory quick eye movement (ACQEM) of Heuberger et al. (1) ACQEMs are anticompensatory in that they are in the same direction as head velocity and so, act to take gaze off the target and thus require later compensatory (overt) saccades to return gaze to the target. Neither of these responses were found in this patient. The patient here was diagnosed with unilateral definite Meniere's disease (MD) on the right and had enhanced VOR (gain of 1.17) for rightward head impulses followed by backup saccades. For leftwards head impulses eye velocity and VOR gain were in the normal range (VOR gain of 0.89). As further confirmation, testing with 1.84 Hz horizontal sinusoidal head movements in the visual-vestibular (VVOR) paradigm also showed these backup saccades for rightwards head turns but normal slow phase eye velocity responses without backup saccades for leftwards had turns. This evidence shows that backup saccades can be observed in some MD patients who show enhanced eye velocity responses during vHIT and that these backup saccades act to correct for gaze position error caused by the enhanced eye velocity during the head impulse and so have a compensatory effect on gaze stabilization.

Evaluation of the Video Ocular Counter-Roll (vOCR) as a New Clinical Test of Otolith Function in Peripheral Vestibulopathy

Importance

Video-oculography (VOG) goggles have been integrated into the assessment of semicircular canal function in patients with vestibular disorders. However, a similar bedside VOG method for testing otolith function is lacking.

Objective

To evaluate the use of VOG-based measurement of ocular counter-roll (vOCR) as a clinical test of otolith function.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A case-control study was conducted to compare vOCR measurement among patients at various stages of unilateral loss of vestibular function with healthy controls. The receiver operating characteristic curve method was used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the vOCR test in detecting loss of otolith function. Participants were recruited at a tertiary center including the Johns Hopkins outpatient clinic and Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland. Participants included 56 individuals with acute (≤4 weeks after surgery), subacute (4 weeks-6 months after surgery), and chronic (>6 months after surgery) unilateral vestibular loss as well as healthy controls. A simple bedside maneuver with en bloc, 30° lateral tilt of the head and trunk was used for vOCR measurement. The study was conducted from February 2, 2017, to March 10, 2019.

Intervention

In each participant vOCR was measured during static tilts of the head and trunk en bloc.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The vOCR measurements and diagnostic accuracy of vOCR in detecting patients with loss of vestibular function from healthy controls.

Results

Of the 56 participants, 28 (50.0%) were men; mean (SD) age was 53.5 (11.4) years. The mean (SD) time of acute unilateral vestibular loss was 9 (7) days (range, 2-17 days) in the acute group, 61 (39) days (range, 28-172 days) in the subacute group, and 985 (1066) days (range 185-4200 days) in the chronic group. The vOCR test showed reduction on the side of vestibular loss, and the deficit was greater in patients with acute and subacute vestibular loss than in patients with chronic loss and healthy controls (acute vs chronic: -1.81°; 95% CI, -3.45° to -0.17°; acute vs control: -3.18°; 95% CI, -4.83° to -1.54°; subacute vs chronic: -0.63°; 95% CI, -2.28° to 1.01°; subacute vs control: -2.01°; 95% CI, -3.65° to -0.36°; acute vs subacute: -1.17°; 95% CI, -2.88° to 0.52°; and chronic vs control: -1.37°; 95% CI, -2.96° to 0.21°). The asymmetry in vOCR between the side of vestibular loss and healthy side was significantly higher in patients with acute vs chronic loss (0.28; 95% CI, 0.06-0.51). Overall, the performance of the vOCR test in discriminating between patients with vestibular loss and healthy controls was 0.83 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve). The best vOCR threshold to detect vestibular loss at the 30° tilt was 4.5°, with a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI, 0.62%-0.88%) and specificity of 82% (95% CI, 0.57%-1.00%).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this case-control study suggest that the vOCR test can be performed with a simple bedside maneuver and may be used to detect or track loss of otolith function.

Vestibular Testing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Vestibular testing, both at the bedside and in the laboratory, is often critical in diagnosing patients with symptoms of vertigo, dizziness, unsteadiness, and oscillopsia. This article introduces readers to core concepts, as well as recent advances, in bedside and instrumented vestibular assessments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Vestibular testing has improved immensely in the past 2 decades. While history and bedside testing is still the primary method of differential diagnosis in patients with dizziness, advances in technology such as the ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential test for superior canal dehiscence and the video head impulse test for vestibular neuritis have capabilities that go far beyond the bedside examination. Current vestibular testing now allows clinicians to test all five vestibular sensors in the inner ear.

SUMMARY

Contemporary vestibular testing technology can now assess the entire vestibular periphery. Relatively subtle conditions, such as superior canal dehiscence or a subtle vestibular neuritis, can now be diagnosed with far greater certainty.

Effects of parameters of video head impulse testing on visually enhanced vestibulo-ocular reflex and vestibulo-ocular reflex suppression

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the main effects of some testing and analysis variables on clinically quantified visually enhanced vestibulo-ocular reflex (VVOR) and vestibulo-ocular reflex suppression (VORS) results using video head impulse test.

METHODS

This prospective observational clinical study included 19 healthy participants who underwent the VVOR and VORS tests. The effect of demographic variables, head oscillation frequency, rotation direction, visual acuity and analysis time window width and location of the recorded tests on the quantified results of both VVOR and VORS were evaluated. And specifically, for the VORS test the effect of cognitive reinforcement of the participant during testing was evaluated.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was observed among the VVOR, non-reinforced VORS, and reinforced VORS tests for mean gain values of 0.91 ± 0.09, 0.6 ± 0.15, and 0.57 ± 0.16, respectively (p < 0.001). The optimized linear mixed-effect model showed a significant influence of frequency on the gain values for the reinforced and non-reinforced VORS tests (p = 0.01 and p = 0.004, respectively). Regarding the gain analysis method, statistically significant differences were found according to the short time interval sample location of the records for the initial location of the VVOR test (p < 0.006) and final location of the reinforced VORS test (p < 0.023).

CONCLUSION

Significant differences were observed in the gain values according to VVOR and VORS testing. Head oscillation frequency is a significant factor that affects the gain values, especially in VORS testing. Moreover, in VORS testing, participant concentration has a significant effect on the test for obtaining suppression gain values. When a short time interval sample is considered for VVOR and VORS testing, intermediate time samples appear the most adequate for both tests.

SIGNIFICANCE

The quantified visually enhanced vestibulo-ocular reflex (VVOR) and vestibulo-ocular reflex suppression (VORS) tests have recently been added to the assortment of available clinical vestibular tests. However, despite the clinical validity of these quantified tests that appear to be of increasing clinical interest, the effects of most of the clinical testing methods and mathematical variables are not well defined. In this research we describe what are the main collecting and analysis variables that could influence to the VVOR and VORS tests. Specially for VORS test, participant concentration on test tasks will have positive effect on the measured vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) suppression.

An Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Vestibular, Cerebellar, and Oculomotor Disorders Using a Systematized Clinical Bedside Examination

The bedside examination associated with their clinical history remains the most critical means to accurately diagnose the cause for most of the signs and symptoms related to pathology of the cerebellum and vestibular system in patients presenting with dizziness and imbalance. This paper focuses on those critical bedside examinations, suggests when laboratory testing might be useful to confirm the clinical suspicion, and considers the shared neural circuitry within the visual and vestibular systems to offer an algorithmic approach in conducting the clinical bedside examination.

Clinical Validity of Quantified Visually Enhanced Vestibulo-ocular Reflex Test to Detect Horizontal Semicircular Canal Hypofunction

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical validity of the mathematical measured VVOR test results to detect horizontal semicircular canal hypofunction.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized, observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center, hospital.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients on first time visit to otoneurology unit.

INTERVENTION(S)

Diagnostic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Values of statistical indicators of clinical validity for VVOR test to detect horizontal canal hypofunction were used considering vHIT horizontal aVOR gain values as gold standard.

RESULTS

Area under curve of ROC curve for quantified VVOR testing was 0.92. Head movement frequency on VVOR test and contralateral VVOR gain were identified as significant influence factors of (unilateral) VVOR gain (p < 0.0001) on statistical linear model.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the obtained results, the quantified VVOR test has excellent clinical validity for detecting angular horizontal VOR hypofunction.

Errors of Upright Perception in Patients With Vestibular Migraine

Patients with vestibular migraine (VM) often report dizziness with changes in the head or body position. Such symptoms raise the possibility of dysfunction in neural mechanisms underlying spatial orientation in these patients. Here we addressed this issue by investigating the effect of static head tilts on errors of upright perception in a group of 27 VM patients in comparison with a group of 27 healthy controls. Perception of upright was measured in a dark room using a subjective visual vertical (SVV) paradigm at three head tilt positions (upright, ±20°). VM patients were also surveyed about the quality of their dizziness and spatial symptoms during daily activities. In the upright head position, SVV errors were within the normal range for VM patients and healthy controls (within 2° from true vertical). During the static head tilts of 20° to the right, VM patients showed larger SVV errors consistent with overestimation of the tilt magnitude (i.e., as if they felt further tilted toward the right side) (VM: −3.21° ± 0.93 vs. Control: 0.52° ± 0.70; p = 0.002). During the head tilt to the left, SVV errors in VM patients did not differ significantly from controls (VM: 0.77° ± 1.05 vs. Control: −0.04° ± 0.68; p = 0.52). There was no significant difference in SVV precision between the VM patients and healthy controls at any head tilt position. Consistent with the direction of the SVV errors in VM patients, they largely reported spatial symptoms toward the right side. These findings suggest an abnormal sensory integration for spatial orientation in vestibular migraine, related to daily dizziness in these patients.

Mathematical Methods for Measuring the Visually Enhanced Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex and Preliminary Results from Healthy Subjects and Patient Groups

Background

Visually enhanced vestibulo–ocular reflex (VVOR) is a well-known bedside clinical test to evaluate visuo–vestibular interaction, with clinical applications in patients with neurological and vestibular dysfunctions. Owing to recently developed diagnostic technologies, the possibility to perform an easy and objective measurement of the VVOR has increased, but there is a lack of computational methods designed to obtain an objective VVOR measurement.

Objectives

To develop a method for the assessment of the VVOR to obtain a gain value that compares head and eye velocities and to test this method in patients and healthy subjects.

Methods

Two computational methods were developed to measure the VVOR test responses: the first method was based on the area under curve of head and eye velocity plots and the second method was based on the slope of the linear regression obtained for head and eye velocity data. VVOR gain and vestibulo–ocular reflex (VOR) gain were analyzed with the data obtained from 35 subjects divided into four groups: healthy (N = 10), unilateral vestibular with vestibular neurectomy (N = 8), bilateral vestibulopathy (N = 12), and cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, and vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS) (N = 5).

Results

Intra-class correlation index for the two developed VVOR analysis methods was 0.99. Statistical differences were obtained by analysis of variance statistical method, comparing the healthy group (VVOR mean gain of 1 ± 0) with all other groups. The CANVAS group exhibited (VVOR mean gain of 0.4 ± 0.1) differences when compared to all other groups. VVOR mean gain for the vestibular bilateral group was 0.8 ± 0.1. VVOR mean gain in the unilateral group was 0.6 ± 0.1, with a Pearson’s correlation of 0.52 obtained when VVOR gain was compared to the VOR gain of the operated side.

Conclusion

Two computational methods to measure the gain of VVOR were successfully developed. The VVOR gain values appear to objectively characterize the VVOR alteration observed in CANVAS patients, and also distinguish between healthy subjects and patients with some vestibular disorders.

Validity and Reliability of Four Clinical Gait Measures in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The gold standards for assessing ambulation are the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) test. In relation with these measures, we assessed the reliability and validity of four clinical gait measures: the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), the 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), and the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). Patient self-report of gait was also assessed using the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12).

METHODS

Individuals 20 years or older with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) and an EDSS score of 2.0 to 6.5 completed the MSWS-12, T25FW test, TUG test, DGI, 2MWT, and 6MWT. All the tests were repeated 2 weeks later at the same time of day to establish their reliability and concurrent validity. Predictive validity was established using the EDSS.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with MS were included. All measures showed high test-retest reliability. The TUG test, 2MWT, and 6MWT were significantly correlated with the T25FW test (Spearman ρ = -0.902, -0.919, and -0.905, respectively). The EDSS was also significantly correlated with all the walking tests. The MSWS-12 demonstrated the highest correlation to the EDSS (ρ = 0.788).

CONCLUSIONS

The TUG test, the DGI, the 2MWT, and the 6MWT exhibited strong psychometric properties and were found to be significant predictors of the EDSS score. Use of these tests to prospectively monitor the effects of medical and rehabilitation treatment should be considered in the comprehensive care of patients with MS.

The Skull Vibration-Induced Nystagmus Test of Vestibular Function-A Review

A 100-Hz bone-conducted vibration applied to either mastoid induces instantaneously a predominantly horizontal nystagmus, with quick phases beating away from the affected side in patients with a unilateral vestibular loss (UVL). The same stimulus in healthy asymptomatic subjects has little or no effect. This is skull vibration-induced nystagmus (SVIN), and it is a useful, simple, non-invasive, robust indicator of asymmetry of vestibular function and the side of the vestibular loss. The nystagmus is precisely stimulus-locked: it starts with stimulation onset and stops at stimulation offset, with no post-stimulation reversal. It is sustained during long stimulus durations; it is reproducible; it beats in the same direction irrespective of which mastoid is stimulated; it shows little or no habituation; and it is permanent—even well-compensated UVL patients show SVIN. A SVIN is observed under Frenzel goggles or videonystagmoscopy and recorded under videonystagmography in absence of visual-fixation and strong sedative drugs. Stimulus frequency, location, and intensity modify the results, and a large variability in skull morphology between people can modify the stimulus. SVIN to 100 Hz mastoid stimulation is a robust response. We describe the optimum method of stimulation on the basis of the literature data and testing more than 18,500 patients. Recent neural evidence clarifies which vestibular receptors are stimulated, how they cause the nystagmus, and why the same vibration in patients with semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD) causes a nystagmus beating toward the affected ear. This review focuses not only on the optimal parameters of the stimulus and response of UVL and SCD patients but also shows how other vestibular dysfunctions affect SVIN. We conclude that the presence of SVIN is a useful indicator of the asymmetry of vestibular function between the two ears, but in order to identify which is the affected ear, other information and careful clinical judgment are needed.

Prevalência de vestibulopatia em idosos institucionalizados de Natal - RN - Brasil

Resumo: OBJETIVO: aferir a prevalência de vestibulopatia e seus fatores associadosem idosos institucionalizados por meio do exame clínico de cabeceira. MÉTODOS: trata-se de um estudo transversal realizado nas 12 Instituições de longa permanência para idosos de Natal-Brasil, regulamentadas pela Vigilância Sanitária. Foram eleitos os idosos com bom nível cognitivo e capazes de deambular, totalizando 115 indivíduos. Os idosos foram questionados sobre a presença de tontura no último ano, e quando a resposta era positiva, eram submetidos a questionário e exame físico específico para diagnóstico de vestibulopatia, segundo o protocolo de Johnson e Lalwani (2004). Para a análise estatística, utilizou-se o teste do Qui-quadrado ou exato de Fisher para um nível de significância de 5% e cálculo da razão de prevalência. RESULTADOS: a prevalência de vestibulopatia foi de 10,56%e foram associados a osteoartrose e o etilismo. CONCLUSÃO: a vestibulopatia apresenta baixa prevalência nos idosos institucionalizados de Natal-Brasil.