Therapeutic ultrasound: The future of epilepsy surgery?

Focused ultrasound for treatment of epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies

Various preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the neuromodulatory and ablative effects of focused ultrasound (FUS). However, the safety and efficacy of FUS in clinical settings for treating epilepsy have not been well established. This study aims to provide a systematic review of all preclinical and clinical studies that have used FUS for the treatment of epilepsy. A systematic search was conducted using Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase databases. All preclinical and clinical studies reporting outcomes of FUS in the treatment of epilepsy were included in the systematic review. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine safety in clinical studies and seizure activity reduction in preclinical studies. A total of 24 articles were included in the study. Meta-analysis demonstrated that adverse events occurred in 13% (95% CI = 2-57%) of patients with epilepsy who underwent FUS. The frequency of adverse events was higher with the use of FUS for lesioning (36%, 95% CI = 4-88%) in comparison to neuromodulation (5%, 95% CI = 0-71%), although this difference was not significant (P = 0.31). Three-level meta-analysis in preclinical studies demonstrated a reduced spike rate in neuromodulating FUS compared to the control group (P = 0.02). According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, FUS can be considered a safe and feasible approach for treating epileptic seizures, especially in drug-resistant patients. While the efficacy of FUS has been demonstrated in several preclinical studies, further research is necessary to confirm its effectiveness in clinical practice and to determine the adverse events.

Innovative minimally invasive options to treat drug-resistant epilepsies

Despite the regular discovery of new molecules, one-third of epileptic patients are resistant to antiepileptic drugs. Only a few can benefit from resective surgery, the current gold standard. Although effective in 50-70% of cases, this therapy remains risky, costly, and can be associated with long-term cognitive or neurological side effects. In addition, patients are increasingly reluctant to have a craniotomy, emphasizing the need for new less invasive therapies for focal drug-resistant epilepsies. Here, we review different minimally invasive approaches already in use in the clinic or under preclinical development to treat drug-resistant epilepsies. Localized thermolesion of the epileptogenic zone has been developed in the clinic using high-frequency thermo-coagulations or magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser or ultrasounds. Although less invasive, they have not yet significantly improved the outcomes when compared with resective surgery. Radiosurgery techniques have been used in the clinic for the last 20years and have proven efficiency. However, their efficacy is not better than resective surgery, and various side effects have been reported as well as the potential risk of sudden unexpected death associated with epilepsy. Recently, a new strategy of radiosurgery has emerged using synchrotron-generated X-ray microbeams: microbeam radiation therapy (MRT). The low divergence and high-flux of the synchrotron beams and the unique tolerance to MRT by healthy brain tissues, allows a precise targeting of specific brain regions with minimal invasiveness and limited behavioral or functional consequences in animals. Antiepileptic effects over several months have been recorded in animal models, and histological and synaptic tracing analysis suggest a reduction of neuronal connectivity as a mechanism of action. The possibility of transferring this approach to epileptic patients is discussed in this review.

Current clinical investigations of focused ultrasound blood-brain barrier disruption: A review

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) presents a formidable challenge in delivering therapeutic agents to the central nervous system. Ultrasound-mediated BBB disruption has emerged as a promising non-invasive technique to enhance drug delivery to the brain. This manuscript reviews fundamental principles of ultrasound-based techniques and their mechanisms of action in temporarily permeabilizing the BBB. Clinical trials employing ultrasound for BBB disruption are discussed, summarizing diverse applications ranging from the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases to targeted drug delivery for brain tumors. The review also addresses safety considerations, outlining the current understanding of potential risks and mitigation strategies associated with ultrasound exposure, including real-time monitoring and assessment of treatment efficacy. Among the large number of studies, significant successes are highlighted thus providing perspective on the future direction of the field.

MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound for Refractory Epilepsy: Where Are We Now?

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological diseases in both adults and children. Despite improvements in medical care, 20 to 30% of patients are still resistant to the best medical treatment. The quality of life, neurologic morbidity, and even mortality of patients are significantly impacted by medically intractable epilepsy. Nowadays, conservative therapeutic approaches consist of increasing medication dosage, changing to a different anti-seizure drug as monotherapy, and combining different antiseizure drugs using an add-on strategy. However, such measures may not be sufficient to efficiently control seizure recurrence. Resective surgery, ablative procedures and non-resective neuromodulatory (deep-brain stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation) treatments are the available treatments for these kinds of patients. However, invasive procedures may involve lengthy inpatient stays for the patients, risks of long-term neurological impairment, general anesthesia, and other possible surgery-related complications (i.e., hemorrhage or infection). In the last few years, MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) has been proposed as an emerging treatment for neurological diseases because of technological advancements and the goal of minimally invasive neurosurgery. By outlining the current knowledge obtained from both preclinical and clinical studies and discussing the technical opportunities of this therapy for particular epileptic phenotypes, in this perspective review, we explore the various mechanisms and potential applications (thermoablation, blood-brain barrier opening for drug delivery, neuromodulation) of high- and low-intensity ultrasound, highlighting possible novel strategies to treat drug-resistant epileptic patients who are not eligible or do not accept currently established surgical approaches. Taken together, the available studies support a possible role for lesional treatment over the anterior thalamus with high-intensity ultrasound and neuromodulation of the hippocampus via low-intensity ultrasound in refractory epilepsy. However, more studies, likely conceiving epilepsy as a network disorder and bridging together different scales and modalities, are required to make ultrasound delivery strategies meaningful, effective, and safe.

Translational strategies and systems biology insights for blood-brain barrier opening and delivery in brain tumors and Alzheimer's disease

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) plays a critical role in determining the effectiveness of systemic treatments for brain diseases. Over the years, several innovative approaches in BBB opening and drug delivery have been developed and progressed into clinical testing phases, including focused ultrasound (FUS) with circulating microbubbles, mannitol-facilitated delivery of anti-neoplastic drugs, receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT) by antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and viral vectors for gene therapy. We provided a comprehensive review of the most recent clinical applications of these approaches in managing brain tumors and Alzheimer's disease (AD), two major devastating brain diseases. Moreover, the spatial-temporal molecular heterogeneity of the BBB under disease states emphasized the importance of utilizing emerging spatial systems biology approaches to unravel novel targets for intervention within BBB and tailor strategies for enhancing drug delivery to the brain. SEARCH STRATEGY AND SELECTION CRITERIA: Data for this Review were identified by searches of clinicaltrials.gov, MEDLINE, Current Contents, PubMed, and references from relevant articles using the search terms "blood-brain barrier", "CNS drug delivery", "BBB modulation", "clinical trials", "systems biology", "primary or metastatic brain tumors", "Alzheimer's disease". Abstracts and reports from meetings were included only when they related directly to previously published work. Only articles published in English between 1980 and 2023 were included.

Safety Profile of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound-Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Opening in Non-epileptic Mice and in a Mouse Model of Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

It is unknown whether ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption can promote epileptogenesis and how BBB integrity changes over time after sonication.

METHODS

To gain more insight into the safety profile of ultrasound (US)-induced BBB opening, we determined BBB permeability as well as histological modifications in C57BL/6 adult control mice and in the kainate (KA) model for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy in mice after sonication with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPU). Microglial and astroglial changes in ipsilateral hippocampus were examined at different time points following BBB disruption by respectively analyzing Iba1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein immunoreactivity. Using intracerebral EEG recordings, we further studied the possible electrophysiological repercussions of a repeated disrupted BBB for seizure generation in nine non-epileptic mice.

RESULTS

LIPU-induced BBB opening led to transient albumin extravasation and reversible mild astrogliosis, but not to microglial activation in the hippocampus of non-epileptic mice. In KA mice, the transient albumin extravasation into the hippocampus mediated by LIPU-induced BBB opening did not aggravate inflammatory processes and histologic changes that characterize the hippocampal sclerosis. Three LIPU-induced BBB opening did not induce epileptogenicity in non-epileptic mice implanted with depth EEG electrodes.

CONCLUSION

Our experiments in mice provide persuasive evidence of the safety of LIPU-induced BBB opening as a therapeutic modality for neurological diseases.

Recent advances in epilepsy surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Technological innovations in the preoperative evaluation, surgical techniques and outcome prediction in epilepsy surgery have grown exponentially over the last decade. This review highlights and emphasizes relevant updates in techniques and diagnostic tools, discussing their context within standard practice at comprehensive epilepsy centres.

RECENT FINDINGS

High-resolution structural imaging has set an unprecedented opportunity to detect previously unrecognized subtle abnormalities. Machine learning and computer science are impacting the methodologies to analyse presurgical and surgical outcome data, building more accurate prediction models to tailor treatment strategies. Robotic-assisted placement of depth electrodes has increased the safety and ability to sample epileptogenic nodes within deep structures, improving our understanding of the seizure networks in drug-resistant epilepsy. The current available minimally invasive techniques are reasonable surgical alternatives to ablate or disrupt epileptogenic regions, although their sustained efficacy is still an active area of research.

SUMMARY

Epilepsy surgery is still underutilized worldwide. Every patient who continues with seizures despite adequate trials of two well selected and tolerated antiseizure medications should be evaluated for surgical candidacy. Collaboration between academic epilepsy centres is of paramount importance to answer long-standing questions in epilepsy surgery regarding the understanding of spatio-temporal dynamics in epileptogenic networks and its impact on surgical outcomes.

Surgery procedures in temporal lobe epilepsies

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common cause of refractory epilepsy amenable for surgical treatment and seizure control. Surgery for TLE is a safe and effective strategy. The seizure-free rate after surgical resection in patients with mesial or neocortical TLE is about 70%. Resective surgery has an advantage over stereotactic radiosurgery in terms of seizure outcomes for mesial TLE patients. Both techniques have similar results for safety, cognitive outcomes, and associated costs. Stereotactic radiosurgery should therefore be seen as an alternative to open surgery for patients with contraindications for or with reluctance to undergo open surgery. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has also shown promising results as a curative technique in mesial TLE but needs to be more deeply evaluated. Brain-responsive stimulation represents a palliative treatment option for patients with unilateral or bilateral MTLE who are not candidates for temporal lobectomy or who have failed a prior mesial temporal lobe resection. Overall, despite the expansion of innovative techniques in recent years, resective surgery remains the reference treatment for TLE and should be proposed as the first-line surgical modality. In the future, ultrasound therapies could become a credible therapeutic option for refractory TLE patients.