Comparison of Histopathologic Features, Clinical Symptoms, and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rates in Biopsy-Positive Temporal Arteritis

Diagnostic approach in giant cell arteritis

Giant cell arteritis (GCA), also known as temporal arteritis, is the most common form of vasculitis in the elderly. While initially described as involving the temporal arteries, GCA can also affect the aorta and its major branches. Despite the increased use of imaging modalities and the availability of temporal artery biopsy, diagnosing GCA remains challenging. GCA should be considered a spectrum, with diagnostic methodologies tailored to the prevalent symptoms. The sensitivity and specificity of different diagnostic approaches can vary depending on the clinical setting. Timing in diagnosing GCA is crucial to prevent serious complications, such as blindness and cerebrovascular ischemic events. While the prompt initiation of glucocorticoids (GCs) has reduced the incidence of major ischemic events, an uncertain diagnosis may expose the patient to unnecessary harm, such as complications from overtreatment or organ damage due to inadequate control of vasculitis. This narrative review will summarize the most widely available diagnostic techniques for GCA and outline our approach for cases where the diagnosis may be uncertain.

Bilateral Scalp Necrosis in Giant Cell Arteritis

ABSTRACT

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a medium-to-large vessel vasculitis of the elderly. Common constitutional clinical features include headache, scalp tenderness, and jaw claudication. Severe unilateral or bilateral visual loss is the most feared ophthalmic complication of GCA. Scalp necrosis is a known ischemic complication of GCA with approximately 100 cases reported in the literature to date. We report a case of scalp pain and an erythematous cutaneous lesion in the distribution of ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve that mimicked herpes zoster ophthalmicus. A temporal artery biopsy was positive for GCA, and small vessel arteritis was seen at the time of simultaneous skin biopsy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such report in the English language ophthalmic literature.

Pathologic Markers Determining Prognosis in Patients With Treated or Healing Giant Cell Arteritis

PURPOSE

To provide quantitative evidence linking the CD68 (cluster of differentiation 68)+ macrophage marker found on temporal artery biopsies (TABs) with disease prognosis.

DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

We examined 42 consecutive patients who had undergone unilateral TABs at a single hospital in 2015. Clinical data, laboratory data, and histopathologic features of TABs were recorded. Inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) with TAB performed at the same center. CD68 immunohistochemistry was used to label macrophages in the TABs. Primary outcome was multiple logistic regression and bivariate comparisons to measure the association between CD68+ cells per histologic section with placement on immunomodulatory therapy (IMT).

RESULTS

Twenty seven patients were female (64%), with a mean age of 72 (standard deviation [SD.] ±7.7). Eleven patients (26%) were placed on IMT, 17 (40%) had disease recurrence during steroid taper, and 25 (60%) were referred to rheumatology. Of 42 biopsies, 35 underwent staining with CD68 to confirm active inflammation in suspicious, but not diagnostic, specimens. Patients eventually placed on IMT had increased CD68+ cells per slice compared to those not on IMT (median 5.00 [25th-75th quartile 2.00-7.15] vs 1.21 [0.38-2.57], P = .031, respectively). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrates that 2.17 CD68+ cells/slice predicts placement on IMT with an odds ratio of 1.54 (95% confidence interval 1.02-2.33, P = .038).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients refractory to initial steroid tapers and those eventually placed on IMT had increased CD68 cells per section. CD68+ macrophages and their location on the internal elastic lamina may predict disease severity in patients with presumed GCA. Our results suggest that this marker may expedite patient triaging to alternate treatment to the usual steroid therapy.

Diagnostic Algorithm for Patients With Suspected Giant Cell Arteritis

BACKGROUND

To identify clinical and laboratory factors contributing to the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and develop a diagnostic algorithm for the evaluation of GCA.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 213 consecutive cases of temporal artery biopsy (TAB) seen at a single academic center over a 10-year period (2000-2009). Pathologic specimens were re-reviewed and agreement between the original and second readings was assessed. A composite clinical suspicion score was created by adding 1 point for each of the following criteria: anterior extracranial circulation ischemia, new onset headache, abnormal laboratory results (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein (CRP), or platelet count), jaw claudication, abnormal or tender superficial temporal artery, constitutional symptoms, and polymyalgia rheumatica; one point was subtracted if a comorbid condition could explain a criterion.

RESULTS

Of the 204 TABs analyzed, pathologic findings were confirmatory in 49 (24.0%) and suggestive in 12 (5.9%). TAB-positive patients were more likely to be older (age 75.2 ± 7.8 vs 69.7 ± 11.0 years, P = 0.0002), complain of jaw claudication (relative-risk = 3.26, P = 0.0014), and have thrombocytosis (relative-risk = 3.3, P = 0.0072) and elevated CRP (relative-risk = 1.8, P = 0.037). None of the patients with a clinical score less than 2 had a positive TAB. Diabetes mellitus and kidney disease were often the explanation for the symptoms and abnormal clinical finding(s) that led to a negative TAB.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a clinical algorithm that is highly predictive for a positive TAB and can be valuable in the evaluation process of suspected cases of GCA.

Correlations between histopathological findings and clinical manifestations in biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis

OBJECTIVE

To correlate histopathological features of positive temporal artery biopsy (TAB) and clinical manifestations of the disease in a large single-center population-based cohort of patients with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis (GCA).

METHODS

A pathologist with expertise in vasculitis and blinded to clinical data and final diagnosis reviewed all TABs performed for suspected GCA at our hospital between January 1986 and December 2013. Histopathologic features evaluated were: the severity of inflammation and intimal hyperplasia, both graded on a semiquantitative scale (mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3), the presence of intraluminal acute thrombosis, calcifications, giant cells, fibrinoid necrosis and laminar necrosis.

RESULTS

274 patients had a final diagnosis of biopsy-proven GCA and were included in the study. Cranial ischemic events (CIEs) were observed in 161 (58.8%), visual manifestations in 79 (28.8%) and permanent (partial or complete) visual loss in 51 (18.6%) patients. Predictors for the development of CIEs were older age (OR = 1.057, 95% CI 1.019-1.097, p = 0.003), lower ESR values (OR = 0.990, 95% CI 0.981-0.999, p = 0.026) as well as the presence of giant cells (OR = 1.848, 95% CI 1.045-3.269, p = 0.035) and laminar necrosis at TAB (OR = 2.334, 95% CI 1.187-4.587, p = 0.014). Predictors for the development of permanent visual loss were lower CRP values (OR = 0.906, 95% CI 0.827-0.992, p = 0.033) and the presence of calcifications at TAB (OR = 3.672, 95% CI 1.479-9.121, p = 0.005). Fibrinoid necrosis was not observed in any of the TABs evaluated.

CONCLUSION

Pathological features of TAB may predict some manifestations of GCA. These findings may have implications for patients' management.

Ophthalmic manifestations of giant cell arteritis

This article reviews the ophthalmic manifestations of giant cell arteritis. An overview of giant cell arteritis as a disease spectrum is presented with special emphasis on the ophthalmic involvement.

Pathological features of temporal arteries in patients with giant cell arteritis presenting with permanent visual loss

BACKGROUND

Permanent visual loss (PVL) is the most feared complication of giant cell arteritis (GCA), and its risk factors are still unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to assess the pathological features predictive of PVL on temporal artery biopsy (TAB) specimens in patients with GCA.

METHODS

The slides of 391 TAB specimens from patients with GCA were reviewed by two pathologists without clinical information.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients (26 females and 3 males, mean age 78.3 years) presented with unilateral PVL at the onset of the disease, and 362 patients (258 females, 104 males, mean age 74.7 years), did not. The pathological features strongly predictive for PVL were the presence (p = 0.003), number (p = 0.001) and aggregates of giant cells (p = 0.001), presence of plasmocytes (p = 0.002), thickened intima (p = 0.007), neoangiogenesis (p = 0.001) and degree of arterial occlusion (p = 0.006). Presence of neutrophils, eosinophils, parietal necrosis, calcification in the arterial wall and disruption of the internal elastic membrane were similar in both groups. Total obstruction of the arterial lumen by a thrombus, intensity of the inflammatory cells infiltration and inflammation of small vessels, nerves and veins surrounding the temporal artery were not associated with blindness. In multivariate analysis, only giant cells remained significantly associated with PVL.

CONCLUSION

Giant cells are strongly associated with PVL, with a significant gradient between great risk and large number of giant cells. However, PVL was neither associated with the intensity of the inflammatory infiltrate, nor with the presence of arterial thrombosis.

Does temporal artery biopsy influence the management of temporal arteritis?

BACKGROUND

Temporal arteritis (TA) is the commonest form of primary vasculitis. Symptoms are variable, and therefore the diagnosis (or exclusion) of TA is often difficult. Surgeons are frequently asked to perform a temporal artery biopsy (TAB), but whether the histological result actually influences clinical management is unclear.

AIM

To assess whether, in routine clinical practice, a TAB affects clinical decision-making in patients with suspected TA.

DESIGN

Retrospective audit.

METHODS

All patients who underwent a TAB in a single hospital over a 2-year period were identified. This included patients referred from different specialist departments. Individual patient records were examined to document the TAB result, and in particular, the timings of commencement and discontinuation of corticosteroid therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients were included. TAB was positive in seven patients and negative in 37. In 31, there was no change in their clinical management despite a negative biopsy result: 18 continued with corticosteroids for >6 months with a clinical diagnosis of TA, and in 13 patients a decision to stop steroids, or an alternative diagnosis, was made before the biopsy result was known.

DISCUSSION

In this retrospective study, only a small number of TABs provided positive histological confirmation of TA, and in most patients undergoing TAB, there was little evidence that clinical decision-making with respect to corticosteroid therapy was influenced by the TAB result.