Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Associated with Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery Use: An Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Research Trends and Hotspots of Big Data in Ophthalmology: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization

PURPOSE

The burst of modern information has significantly promoted the development of global medicine into a new era of big data healthcare. Ophthalmology is one of the most prominent medical specialties driven by big data analytics. This study aimed to describe the development status and research hotspots of big data in ophthalmology.

METHODS

English articles and reviews related to big data in ophthalmology published from January 1, 1999, to April 30, 2024, were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. The relevant information was analyzed and visualized using VOSviewer and CiteSpace software.

RESULTS

A total of 406 qualified documents were included in the analysis. The annual number of publications on big data in ophthalmology reached a rapidly increasing stage since 2019. The United States (n = 147) led in the number of publications, followed by India (n = 77) and China (n = 69). The L.V. Prasad Eye Institute in India was the most productive institution (n = 50), and Anthony Vipin Das was the most influential author with the most relevant literature (n = 45). The electronic medical records were the primary source of ophthalmic big data, and artificial intelligence served as the principal analytics tool. Diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, and myopia are currently the main topics of interest in this field.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of big data in ophthalmology has experienced rapid growth in recent years. Big data is expected to play an increasingly significant role in shaping the future of research and clinical practice in ophthalmology.

Racial Disparities in Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery for Management of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate racial and ethnic differences in the use of microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) for the management of mild-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in the United States.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with a diagnosis of mild or moderate POAG, as defined by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, were included. The experimental group comprised African American (AA) patients, and the control group consisted of patients without an AA designation in the TriNetX database.

METHODS

Propensity scoring was used to match cohorts for age at diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index, sex, nicotine dependence, glaucoma medications, family history of POAG, body mass index, and weight. Outcome was incidence of MIGS over 1 year of follow-up. Odds ratios were calculated between cohorts.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Incidence of MIGS over 1 year of follow-up post-POAG diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 63,418 POAG patients were included (50% AA, 50% non-AA). AA patients were found to undergo MIGS at a significantly lower rate (1,268 of 31,709) compared with non-AA patients (1,508 of 31,709) (odds ratio 0.834, 95% CI 0.773-0.900).

CONCLUSION

Although POAG is understood to be more prevalent among African Americans, these patients display lower use of MIGS, suggesting a possible nationwide racial disparity in the management of POAG.

Association of Social Determinants of Health With the Likelihood of Treatment With Laser Trabeculoplasty in a US Database

PRCIS

Among 1861 adults with ocular hypertension or mild or moderate primary open angle glaucoma, those with Medicaid or no insurance had a statistically significantly lower likelihood of receiving laser trabeculoplasty compared with those with other insurance.

PURPOSE

To determine whether social determinants of health are associated with undergoing treatment with laser trabeculoplasty (LTP) among individuals with ocular hypertension (OHT) or mild or moderate primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we included patients with OHT or mild or moderate POAG from the National Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program, a diverse US nationwide data set. Logistic regression was performed to study the association between LTP treatment status and 7 covariates (diagnosis severity, age, gender, race/ethnicity, income, insurance status, and education).

RESULTS

A total of 1861 subjects were included (median age of 72 y). In univariable logistic regression, diagnosis severity, older age, higher income, and insurance (non-Medicaid) were associated with LTP treatment. On multivariable logistic regression models, those with mild POAG (OR, 3.49; 95% CI: 2.12-5.87) and moderate POAG [OR, 7.15 (4.49-11.8)] were still more likely than OHT patients to have received LTP. Moreover, compared with participants with Medicaid or no insurance, participants with other insurance (eg, employer-provided, Medicare) were still more likely to have received LTP [OR, 2.24 (1.08-5.29)]. There was no significant difference in the LTP treatment likelihood based on race/ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

After controlling for confounders, the likelihood of receiving LTP appears to be driven primarily by insurance rather than income or race/ethnicity. Potential reasons for decreased utilization of LTP among Medicaid patients include higher rates of declining the procedure, or LTP may have been offered less frequently due to Medicaid's lower levels of reimbursement and longer reimbursement delays.

Global tendency and research trends of minimally invasive surgery for glaucoma from 1992 to 2023: A visual bibliometric analysis

Background

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery has become a popular research topic over the past decade. However, no published studies have provided a systematic overview for this field. A bibliometric analysis is urgently required to characterise current international trends and provide an intuitive description of past and emerging trends.

Methods

This study analysed minimally invasive glaucoma surgery-related studies by searching the Web of Science for relevant articles published between 1992 and 2023. All the retrieved titles and abstracts were screened for eligibility, and only articles and reviews written in English were included in the analysis. CiteSpace (version 6.1.6), VOSviewer (version 1.6.19), and the bibliometric package in RStudio were used to construct and visualise the results.

Results

A total of 1533 publications were included in the analysis with 26072 citations. A total of 4482 authors from 1191 organizations in 57 countries and regions published papers in 139 journals. After 2010, the number of publications increased significantly, with the highest annual productivity occurring in 2022 (n = 229, 15 %). Most of these studies were published in ophthalmology journals. The journal "Ophthalmology" ranked first with 30 papers and 5275 citations. Among the 10 most productive countries, the United States had the largest share of publications (n = 423, 36 %) and Switzerland had the highest proportion of multiple-country publications (70 %). Neodymium was the first keyword discovered, appearing in 1992 and continuing for 21 years. Kahook dual-blade, progression, gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy, efficacy, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, cataract extraction, and primary open-angle glaucoma were the most recent keywords since 2020.

Conclusions

This was the first bibliometric analysis of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery and provides an overview of the developments in this field. Our results identified outstanding studies, countries, institutions, journals, and authors in the field to point the way forward for scientific research and clinical applications of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery.

Historical and Contemporary Debates in Schlemm's Canal-Based MIGS

Glaucoma is one of the primary causes of blindness worldwide. Canal opening surgery, a type of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) applied in cases of mild to moderate glaucoma, has gained increasing popularity in recent years due to its efficacy in reducing the intraocular pressure, its safety profile, the simplicity of its technique, and the reduced likelihood of compromised vision. Nevertheless, the existing body of histopathological studies remains insufficient for a comprehensive understanding of post-surgical wound healing. Consequently, debates persist among researchers regarding the mechanism through which Schlemm's canal opening surgery reduces the intraocular pressure, as well as the surgical techniques that may impact the outcomes and the factors influencing surgical success. As the history of MIGS is relatively short and lacks sufficient systemic reviews or meta-analyses evaluating the influence of individual factors, this review was conducted to illuminate the disparities in researchers' opinions at the current stage of research.

Big data to guide glaucoma treatment

Ophthalmology has been at the forefront of the medical application of big data. Often harnessed with a machine learning approach, big data has demonstrated potential to transform ophthalmic care, as evidenced by prior success on clinical tasks such as the screening of ophthalmic diseases and lesions via retinal images. With the recent establishment of various large ophthalmic datasets, there has been greater interest in determining whether the benefits of big data may extend to the downstream process of ophthalmic disease management. An area of substantial investigation has been the use of big data to help guide or streamline management of glaucoma, which remains a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. In this review, we summarize relevant studies utilizing big data and discuss the application of the findings in the risk assessment and treatment of glaucoma.

Big data and electronic health records for glaucoma research

The digitization of health records through electronic health records (EHRs) has transformed the landscape of ophthalmic research, particularly in the study of glaucoma. EHRs offer a wealth of structured and unstructured data, allowing for comprehensive analyses of patient characteristics, treatment histories, and outcomes. This review comprehensively discusses different EHR data sources, their strengths, limitations, and applicability towards glaucoma research. Institutional EHR repositories provide detailed multimodal clinical data, enabling in-depth investigations into conditions such as glaucoma and facilitating the development of artificial intelligence applications. Multicenter initiatives such as the Sight Outcomes Research Collaborative and the Intelligent Research In Sight registry offer larger, more diverse datasets, enhancing the generalizability of findings and supporting large-scale studies on glaucoma epidemiology, treatment outcomes, and practice patterns. The All of Us Research Program, with a special emphasis on diversity and inclusivity, presents a unique opportunity for glaucoma research by including underrepresented populations and offering comprehensive health data even beyond the EHR. Challenges persist, such as data access restrictions and standardization issues, but may be addressed through continued collaborative efforts between researchers, institutions, and regulatory bodies. Standardized data formats and improved data linkage methods, especially for ophthalmic imaging and testing, would further enhance the utility of EHR datasets for ophthalmic research, ultimately advancing our understanding and treatment of glaucoma and other ocular diseases on a global scale.

Intraocular Pressure Spike Following Stand-Alone Phacoemulsification in the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight)

PURPOSE

To evaluate risk factors for intraocular pressure (IOP) spike after cataract surgery using the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with IRIS Registry data who underwent stand-alone phacoemulsification from January 1, 2013, through September 30, 2019.

METHODS

Intraocular pressure spike was defined as postoperative IOP of > 30 mmHg and > 10 mmHg from the baseline within the first postoperative week. Odds ratios (ORs) for demographic and clinical characteristics were calculated with univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence and OR of IOP spike.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 1 191 034 eyes (patient mean age, 71.3 years; 61.2% female sex; and 24.8% with glaucoma). An IOP spike occurred in 3.7% of all eyes, 5.2% of eyes with glaucoma, and 3.2% of eyes without glaucoma (P < 0.0001). Multivariable analyses of all eyes indicated a greater risk of IOP spike with higher baseline IOP (OR, 1.57 per 3 mmHg), male sex (OR, 1.79), glaucoma (OR, 1.20), Black race (OR, 1.39 vs. Asian and 1.21 vs. Hispanic), older age (OR, 1.07 per 10 years), and complex surgery coding (OR, 1.22; all P < 0.0001). Diabetes (OR, 0.90) and aphakia after surgery (OR, 0.60) seemed to be protective against IOP spike (both P < 0.0001). Compared with glaucoma suspects, ocular hypertension (OR, 1.55), pigmentary glaucoma (OR, 1.56), and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (OR, 1.52) showed a greater risk of IOP spike and normal-tension glaucoma (OR, 0.55), suspected primary angle closure (PAC; OR, 0.67), and PAC glaucoma (OR, 0.81) showed less risk (all P < 0.0001). Using more baseline glaucoma medications was associated with IOP spike (OR, 1.18 per medication), whereas topical β-blocker use (OR, 0.68) was protective (both P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher baseline IOP, male sex, glaucoma, Black race, older age, and complex cataract coding were associated with early postoperative IOP spike, whereas diabetes and postoperative aphakia were protective against a spike after stand-alone phacoemulsification. Glaucomatous eyes demonstrated different risk profiles dependent on glaucoma subtype. The findings may help surgeons to stratify and mitigate the risk of IOP spike after cataract surgery.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Social determinants of health and health disparities in glaucoma: A review

Social determinants of health and barriers to care can significantly impact patients' access to glaucoma care and treatment, resulting in disparities within disease presentation, progression, management, and treatment outcomes. The widespread adoption of electronic health record systems has allowed researchers and clinicians to further explore these relationships, identifying factors such as race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status to be risk factors for more severe disease and lower treatment adherence. These disparities highlight potential targets for interventions to combat these disparities and improve overall patient outcomes. This article provides a summary of the available data on health disparities within glaucoma disease presentation, progression, management, treatment, and outcomes and discusses interventions to improve care delivery and outcomes among patients with glaucoma.

Understanding racial disparities of glaucoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Increased prevalence, earlier onset, and more rapid progression to vision loss from glaucoma has demonstrated racial disparity in numerous studies over decades. Precise etiologies of these important differences among patients of African and Hispanic ancestral background have not been elucidated. This review focuses on currently available epidemiologic/population, genetic, socioeconomic and physiologic studies of racial disparities in this blinding disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

In depth reviews of several landmark studies of glaucoma prevalence in various racial groups have highlighted potential challenges of lack of recruitment of diverse populations in genetic studies and clinical trials, challenges of racial stratification of subjects, and the impact of socioeconomic variables.

SUMMARY

Through a more comprehensive analysis of racial disparities of glaucoma, both clinicians and researchers may provide more effective population screening and management with a holistic approach for individualized patient care to provide improved outcomes. Future studies of interventions in sociodemographic factors and genetic/physiologic variables that influence the prevalence, access, and consequential vision loss from glaucoma will be crucial to minimize/eliminate racial disparities and improve outcomes for all.

Lessons From The Glaucoma Foundation Think Tank 2023: A Patient-Centric Approach to Glaucoma

PRCIS

The main takeaways also included that BIG DATA repositories and AI are important combinatory tools to foster novel strategies to prevent and stabilize glaucoma and, in the future, recover vision loss from the disease.

PURPOSE

To summarize the main topics discussed during the 28th Annual Glaucoma Foundation Think Tank Meeting "A Patient-Centric Approach to Glaucoma" held in New York on June 9 and 10, 2023.

METHODS

The highlights of the sessions on BIG DATA, genetics, modifiable lifestyle risk factors, female sex hormones, and neuroprotection in the field of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) were summarized.

RESULTS

The researchers discussed the importance of BIG DATA repositories available at national and international levels for POAG research, including the United Kingdom Biobank. Combining genotyped large cohorts worldwide, facilitated by artificial intelligence (AI) and machine-learning approaches, led to the milestone discovery of 312 genome-wide significant disease loci for POAG. While these loci could be combined into a polygenic risk score with clinical utility, Think Tank meeting participants also provided analytical epidemiological evidence that behavioral risk factors modify POAG polygenetic risk, citing specific examples related to caffeine and alcohol use. The impact of female sex hormones on POAG pathophysiology was discussed, as was neuroprotection and the potential use of AI to help mitigate specific challenges faced in clinical trials and speed approval of neuroprotective agents.

CONCLUSIONS

The experts agreed on the importance of genetics in defining individual POAG risk and highlighted the additional crucial role of lifestyle, gender, blood pressure, and vascular risk factors. The main takeaways also included that BIG DATA repositories and AI are important combinatory tools to foster novel strategies to prevent and stabilize glaucoma and, in the future, recover vision loss from the disease.

Sex or Gender Reporting in Ophthalmology Clinical Trials Among US Food and Drug Administration Approvals, 1995 to 2022

Importance

As critical determinants of scientific rigor, reproducibility, and equity, sex and gender should be considered in clinical trial design and reporting.

Objective

To evaluate the accuracy of sex and gender reporting and extent of sex- and gender-based analysis in clinical trials associated with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug approvals between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2022.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cross-sectional study of participants enrolled in FDA ophthalmology trials, the following trial documents were reviewed by pairs of independent reviewers in decreasing order of priority: peer-reviewed publication, ClinicalTrials.gov report, and FDA medical and statistical reviews. Trial protocols and supplementary materials were also reviewed.

Main Outcome and Measures

The proportion of trials that correctly applied sex and gender terminology, reported the method of assessing sex or gender, and conducted sex- or gender-based data analysis; incorrect application of sex and gender terminology was defined as interchangeable use of sex- and gender-related terms without a clear justification.

Results

Between 1995 and 2022, 34 ophthalmic drugs corresponding to 85 trials (34 740 participants) received FDA approval, of which 16 drugs (47.1%) corresponding to 32 trials (18 535 participants [37.6%]) were associated with peer-reviewed publications. Sixteen trials used sex and gender terminology correctly (19.5%). No trial reported how sex and gender were collected nor enrolled participants from sexual and gender identity minority populations. Most trials reported sex- and gender-disaggregated demographic data (96.5%), but few conducted sex- or gender-based analysis for data on dropout (1.2%), primary outcomes (28.2%), secondary outcomes (2.4%), and adverse events (9.4%). Erroneous sex and gender reporting was associated with later publication year (2008.5 vs 2001.0; median difference, 7.5; 95% CI, -6.0 to 11.0; P < .001) and higher journal influence metrics, including 2022 journal impact factor (13.7 vs 5.9; median difference, 7.8; 95% CI, -1.4 to 152.4, P < .001) and 2022 journal citation indicator (4.9 vs 2.1; median difference, 2.9; 95% CI, 0-20.0, P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this observational study, over three-quarters of ophthalmology trials associated with FDA drug approvals conflated sex and gender and over two-thirds lacked sex- and gender-based analyses. More rigorous integration of sex and gender appears warranted for FDA, and presumably other trials, to improve their validity, reproducibility, and equity.

Glaucoma in Black Individuals: How Far Have We Come and Where Do We Go From Here?

PURPOSE

To provide updates on the key scientific discoveries made and sociological theories put forth that have allowed for a better understanding of the disproportionate burden of glaucoma among Black individuals, and to provide insights into future directions for this important field of work.

DESIGN

Perspective with a scoping review of the literature.

METHODS

Review, synthesis, and critical appraisal of selected literature on the impact of glaucoma in Black Americans. Important studies within and outside of ophthalmology are considered to allow for a greater understanding of the historical, sociopolitical, and encompassing medical contexts surrounding this complex issue.

RESULTS

A historical overview of key epidemiologic studies highlights the repeated and unequivocal demonstration of increased risk of glaucoma in Black individuals. To begin to understand this multi-layered racial disparity, a historical review of race as a social-legal construct is provided. A careful examination of genetic ancestry is considered as a partial means by which increased glaucoma risk is conferred among Black individuals. The growing body of work examining social determinants as an important driver for racial disparities in glaucoma is also reviewed. Finally, the pitfalls and dangers of race-based medicine are highlighted through illustrative cases before providing insights to future directions.

CONCLUSIONS

Though our understanding of the disparities in glaucoma in Black individuals has grown over the past decades, gaps persist, particularly due to deficient data driven by a lack of studies in this disproportionately burdened group. Though the use of race as a variable may become increasingly less relevant with the rise of precision medicine, it remains a crucial, though flawed concept that continues to be our best means by which to measure, investigate, and intervene upon these disparities in our efforts to achieve health equity.

Cystoid Macular Edema after Cataract Surgery in the United States: IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) Analysis

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence, risk factors, and visual outcomes of cystoid macular edema (CME) after cataract surgery in the United States.

DESIGN

Retrospective, longitudinal, case-control study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

METHODS

The American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) was used to analyze patients who underwent cataract surgery between 2016 and 2019. Patients who received a diagnosis of CME within 90 days after cataract surgery were classified as cases, and the rest were classified as controls. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk factors associated with the development of CME as well as poor visual outcome (defined as a best-recorded visual acuity worse than 20/40 Snellen equivalent at postoperative month 12).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence, demographics, baseline characteristics, and visual outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 3.1 million cataract surgeries performed during the study period, CME was diagnosed in 25 595 eyes (0.8%), with an average onset of 6 weeks. Patients with CME were more likely to be male, to be aged < 65 years, to be Black, and to have preexisting diabetic retinopathy. Patients with CME were more likely to have a poor visual outcome (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.66-1.84; P < 0.001), with a mean best-recorded visual acuity of 20/30 at postoperative month 12 (compared with 20/25 for those without CME; P < 0.001). Other factors associated with a poor visual outcome included smoking, Medicaid insurance, non-White race, and baseline ocular comorbidities such as macular degeneration and retinal vein occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the incidence of CME after cataract surgery is low and most eyes achieve a visual acuity of 20/40 or better, there are significant outcome disparities that warrant further exploration.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Disparities in Glaucoma Surgery: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions for Improvement

There is a need to understand existing disparities in glaucoma surgery and to create strategies to eliminate these disparities. Disparities can exist in several aspects of glaucoma surgical management, including patient selection and timing of surgery, type of surgery performed, intra-operative and postoperative surgical complications, follow-up surgical care, and long-term surgical outcomes. Additionally, multiple types of disparities can exist within each of these realms, including disparities by race and ethnicity, age, gender, insurance type, people with disabilities, and other social, economic, and demographic factors. Disparities in glaucoma surgery have been examined in large scale datasets, retrospective clinical studies, and clinical trials, and several studies have identified likely racial and ethnic disparities in glaucoma surgical incidence and outcomes. We present existing literature on disparities in glaucoma surgery, analyze the advantages and limitations of various study designs for the investigation of these disparities, and propose directions for future research and interventions to identify and eliminate disparities in surgical glaucoma care.

Big data in corneal diseases and cataract: Current applications and future directions

The accelerated growth in electronic health records (EHR), Internet-of-Things, mHealth, telemedicine, and artificial intelligence (AI) in the recent years have significantly fuelled the interest and development in big data research. Big data refer to complex datasets that are characterized by the attributes of "5 Vs"-variety, volume, velocity, veracity, and value. Big data analytics research has so far benefitted many fields of medicine, including ophthalmology. The availability of these big data not only allow for comprehensive and timely examinations of the epidemiology, trends, characteristics, outcomes, and prognostic factors of many diseases, but also enable the development of highly accurate AI algorithms in diagnosing a wide range of medical diseases as well as discovering new patterns or associations of diseases that are previously unknown to clinicians and researchers. Within the field of ophthalmology, there is a rapidly expanding pool of large clinical registries, epidemiological studies, omics studies, and biobanks through which big data can be accessed. National corneal transplant registries, genome-wide association studies, national cataract databases, and large ophthalmology-related EHR-based registries (e.g., AAO IRIS Registry) are some of the key resources. In this review, we aim to provide a succinct overview of the availability and clinical applicability of big data in ophthalmology, particularly from the perspective of corneal diseases and cataract, the synergistic potential of big data, AI technologies, internet of things, mHealth, and wearable smart devices, and the potential barriers for realizing the clinical and research potential of big data in this field.

Inequities and Research Gaps in Ophthalmology: A Scoping Review

Importance

Deficient ophthalmologic care is costly to patients, making the identification of groups not receiving adequate care of vital importance. The current landscape of equity in ophthalmic care has yet to be thoroughly investigated and is important to ensure inclusivity and patient-centered care.

Objective

To perform a scoping review of the literature pertaining to health care inequities in the field of ophthalmology.

Evidence Review

A comprehensive database search using MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Ovid Embase was done in July 2022. English-language articles published from 2016 to 2021 were included and encompassed all article types except commentaries or correspondence. The search modeled the National Institutes of Health list of designated US health inequity populations, which includes income, education level, occupational status, rural and underresourced area, sex and gender, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) identity, and race and ethnicity. A total of 8170 abstracts and titles were screened by 2 independent investigators, and 189 studies were assessed in full text for eligibility. For inclusion, articles needed to be an ophthalmic study discussing health inequities. In a masked, duplicate fashion, 2 independent investigators screened 75 full-text studies for data extraction using a pilot-tested form. Data extraction included general publication characteristics and health inequity data based on the National Institutes of Health's defined inequity groups.

Findings

A total of 75 publications were included. Notable inequities were found among Black and Hispanic patients associated with negative ophthalmic outcomes and mixed associations regarding sex or gender. Overall, lower-income patients were more likely to have vision impairment, use eye care services less, and have lower adherence to eye examinations. No articles within our sample examined LGBTQ inequities among ophthalmology patients since the 2016 National Institutes of Health classification of sexual and gender minority populations. Substantial research gaps were observed within the ophthalmic literature pertaining to the LGBTQ community, race and ethnicity, and rural and underresourced areas.

Conclusions and Relevance

This scoping review found substantial findings associated with the LGBTQ community, race and ethnicity, and the role of telemedicine in rural and underresourced areas. Because of the importance of ophthalmic care in overall patient health, it is vital to understand the various inequities present and strive to improve the current gaps in the literature. Future studies should (1) examine barriers to clinical study and medical trainee recruitment as well as patient values and preference studies and (2) investigate the implementation of telemedicine in underresourced areas.

Canaloplasty and trabeculotomy with the OMNI® surgical system in OAG with prior trabecular microbypass stenting

Purpose

Evaluate effectiveness and safety outcomes for patients treated with canaloplasty and trabeculotomy previously treated with a trabecular microbypass stent (TBS).

Methods

Retrospective, multicenter, IRB approved study. Patients treated with TBS (iStent/iStent inject, Glaukos) and subsequently with OMNI surgical system (OSS) (Sight Sciences). From 5 practices in 5 US states. Open-angle glaucoma (OAG), minimum 3 months follow-up after OSS surgery, Pre-OSS IOP ≥ 17 mmHg on ≥ 1 medication. No glaucoma procedures between TBS and OSS. Endpoints: proportion with ≥ 20% reduction in IOP, IOP between 6 and 18 mmHg, mean IOP, change in IOP, mean number of medications. Adverse events and secondary surgical interventions (SSI). Mann–Whitney rank sum test compared pre-OSS IOP and medications with follow-up.

Results

Twenty seven patients. Average age (SD) 72.2 (10.8), 22/27 primary OAG (82%), mean MD − 6.2 (7.0) dB. Mean IOP before OSS 22.3 (4.3) mmHg on 2.2 (1.3) medications. At last follow-up (mean 11 months) IOP was 17.2 mmHg on 1.8 medications, − 5.1 mmHg (− 23%, p < .001), − 0.4 meds (− 18%, p = .193); ≥ 20% IOP reduction (41%), IOP ≤ 18 (56%). Adverse events were non-serious. Hyphema > 1 mm (3, 11%), BCVA decrease (4, 15%), IOP spike (2, 7%). SSI (4, 15%) had higher pre-OSS IOP (23.4 mmHg) and worse MD (− 9.6 dB).

Conclusion

Patients uncontrolled by medication and a prior TBS would once have been candidates for trabeculectomy and tube shunts. OSS offered a minimally invasive option that provided IOP control and avoidance of traditional surgery for the majority over follow-up averaging 11 months and up to 42 months.

The American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research In Sight): current and future state of big data analytics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the drivers, development, and current state of the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research In Sight), and analytics involving deidentified aggregate IRIS Registry data.

RECENT FINDINGS

The IRIS Registry has a core mission of quality improvement and reporting. In addition, analytic projects performed to date have included characterizing patient populations and diseases, incidence, and prevalence; clinical outcomes and complications; risk factors and effect modifiers; practice patterns; and trends over time. Pipeline projects include application of artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches for predictive modeling and analytics, disease mapping, detecting patterns and identifying cohorts, and optimizing treatment based on patient-specific characteristics.

SUMMARY

The IRIS Registry is the nation's largest single specialty clinical registry, with unique data elements specific to ophthalmology. It offers a wealth of opportunities involving big data analytics, including traditional inferential statistics as well as machine learning and artificial intelligence approaches scalable on massive amounts of data.

The evolving field of Big Data: understanding geographic information systems analysis and its transformative potential in ophthalmic research

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review to is to highlight alternative uses of Big Data in the pursuit of ophthalmologic public health. In particular, we highlight geographic information systems (GIS) analysis as a type of Big Data, summarize various GIS methods, and enumerate sources of geographic data.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent implementation of the IRIS Registry Data, has expanded our real-world knowledge of ophthalmology in the United States. Such innovations in Big Data allow us to better define ophthalmic diseases, treatments, and outcomes for underserved individuals and subpopulations. One underutilized source of Big Data entails use of geographic information to evaluate geographic heterogeneity and access across the United States.

SUMMARY

GIS and Big Data allow for refined epidemiologic estimates of eye disease for specific communities. In particular, how GIS can enable researchers to examine disparities in access to ophthalmic care is reviewed. GIS best practices and some data sources for GIS in ophthalmology are also summarized.

An IRIS® Registry-Based Assessment of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Practice Patterns in Academic versus Non-Academic Settings

PURPOSE

To compare patient demographic data; level of severity; and clinical, diagnostic, and surgical practice patterns in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in an academic setting (AS) versus non-academic setting (NAS) using the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of IRIS® Registry data that included patients with POAG who were seen between January 2016 and December 2019 and had at least one year of follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 3,707,084 distinct eyes with POAG, 3% (109,920) were included in the academic subcohort and 97% (3,597,164) were included in the non-academic subcohort. Among the findings of greatest note (P < .0001 for all comparisons) were a higher proportion of eyes of Black patients, a higher proportion of eyes with level 3 severity, and a higher mean cup-to-disc ratio in eyes in the AS. The relative frequency of gonioscopy, pachymetry, and visual field testing in conjunction with new patient visits was also notably higher in the AS. For glaucoma surgical procedures, the greatest proportional differences in relative frequency were seen for tube shunt procedures (2.55-fold higher in the AS), iStent and Hydrus procedures (2.52-fold higher in the NAS), and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (5.80-fold higher in the NAS).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on IRIS® Registry data, notable differences appear to exist with regard to ethno-racial groups, glaucoma severity, and diagnostic and surgical practice patterns in AS versus NAS. By understanding these differences, potential opportunities exist in the development of educational programs related to clinical and surgical glaucoma care.

Corneal endothelial cell density loss following glaucoma surgery alone or in combination with cataract surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

TOPIC

Corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) loss following glaucoma surgery with or without cataract surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Corneal ECD loss may occur due to intraoperative surgical trauma in glaucoma surgery or postoperatively with chronic endothelial cell trauma or irritation.

METHODS

Trabeculectomy, glaucoma filtration surgery or microinvasive glaucoma surgery in participants with ocular hypertension, primary and secondary open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma and angle-closure glaucoma were included. Pediatric populations and participants with pre-existing corneal disease were excluded. Laser treatments and peripheral iridotomy were excluded. Electronic databases searched in December 2021 included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov and The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), FDA PMA and FDA 510(k).

RESULTS

39 studies were included in quantitative synthesis. 12 months following suprachoroidal MIGS mean ECD loss was 282 cells/mm² (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 220 to 345; p <0.00001; Chi² = 0.06; I² = 0%; 2 studies; very low certainty). Mean ECD loss after Schlemm's canal implantable devices was 338 cells/mm² (95% CI 185 to 491; p<0.0001; Chi² = 0.08; I² = 0%; 2 studies; low certainty) at 12 months. When compared to phacoemulsification alone, Schlemm's canal implants combined with phacoemulsification showed statistically significant mean ECD reduction at 24 months; mean difference of ECD was -19% (95% CI -37% to -2%; p=0.03; Chi² = 3.04; I² = 34%; 3 studies; low certainty). Mean ECD loss was 64 cells/mm² (95% CI 21 to 107; p=0.004; Chi² = 4.55; I² = 0%; 6 studies; low certainty) following Schlemm's canal procedures (without implantable devices) at 12 months. At 12 months the mean ECD loss after trabeculectomy was 33 cells/mm² (95% CI -38 to 105, p=0.36, Chi² = 1.17; I² = 0%; moderate certainty). At 12 months mean ECD loss was 121 cells/mm² (95% CI 53 to 189; p=0.0005; Chi² = 3.00; I² = 0%; 5 studies; low certainty) after Express implantation. When compared to control fellow eye, aqueous shunt surgery reduced ECD by 5.75% (95% CI -0.93 to 12.43; p=0.09 Chi² = 1.32; I² = 0%; low certainty) and 8.11% ECD loss (95%CI 0.06 to 16.16 p=0.05; Chi²= 1.93; I²=48%) at 12 and 24 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall there is low certainty evidence to suggest that glaucoma surgery involving long-term implants has a greater extent of ECD loss than glaucoma filtration surgeries without the use of implants. The results of this review support long-term follow-up (beyond 36 months) to assess ECD loss and corneal decompensation following implantation of glaucoma drainage implants.