The prognostic role of medical comorbidities in surgically treated human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Histopathological Prognostic Factors of Surgically Treated HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is rising in prevalence and is associated with better survival than HPV-negative OPSCC. In surgically treated HPV-negative OPSCCs, adverse pathologic features such as positive surgical margins, extra-nodal extension (ENE) and perineural invasion are well described to portend worse clinical outcomes. These adverse pathological features, however, are not validated prognostic markers among surgically treated HPV-positive OPSCCs. To that end, we pooled all available evidence to address the prognostic significance of these histologic features.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science and Embase databases were systematically searched for articles evaluating 13 known adverse histopathological prognostic factors of surgically treated HPV-associated OPSCC. Data analysis was done using R v4.0.5.

RESULTS

A total of 32 studies (n = 31,535) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. ENE and advanced pT stage were associated with poorer overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR):1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.59-2.03], p < 0.0001, HR: 3.28, 95% CI [2.20-4.87], p = 0.0025]; disease-specific survival (DSS) (HR: 3.14, 95% CI [1.20-8.26], p = 0.0327, HR: 3.49, 95% CI [2.45-4.96], p = 0.0043) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR: 2.03, 95% CI [1.05-3.94], p = 0.0397, HR: 3.66, 95% CI [2.81-4.77], p = 0.0001) respectively. The presence of lymphovascular invasion (HR: 1.46, 95% CI [1.22-1.75], p = 0.0018) and positive margins (HR: 1.50, 95% CI [1.185-1.899], p = 0.0069) significantly worsen OS.

CONCLUSION

ENE, advanced pT stage, positive margins and lymphovascular invasion were adverse histologic prognostic marker among surgically treated HPV-positive OPSCC. The presence of these factors should be carefully evaluated in order to select the optimal patients for surgical treatment.

Risk Stratification in HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer: Limitations of Current Approaches and the Search for Better Solutions

The rising incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) necessitates advancements in risk stratification to optimize treatment outcomes and improve the quality of life for patients. Despite its favorable prognosis compared to HPV-negative OPSCC, current clinical staging and biomarkers, such as p16 status, are limited in their ability to distinguish between high- and low-risk patients within HPV-associated OPSCC. This limitation results in the overtreatment of low-risk patients, exposing them to unnecessary toxicity, and the undertreatment of high-risk patients who require more aggressive interventions. This review critically evaluates current stratification methods, including clinical assessments, de-escalation trials, and candidate molecular biomarkers for risk stratification. Emerging approaches such as immune markers, viral genomic integration patterns, and other molecular markers offer promising avenues for enhanced prognostic accuracy. By integrating advanced risk stratification methods, tailored treatment approaches may one day be developed to balance oncologic efficacy with reduced treatment-related morbidity. This review underscores the need for continued research into predictive biomarkers and adaptive treatment strategies to better address the diverse risk profiles of HPV-associated OPSCC patients.

Impact of diabetes on the prognosis of patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer: A meta-analysis

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

Diabetes has been related to an increased risk of oral cancer. Nevertheless, the impact of diabetes on the outcome of individuals with oral and oropharyngeal cancer is not clear. In this study, a meta-analysis was carried out to assess the link between diabetes and the survival of individuals with oral and oropharyngeal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Relevant cohort studies for the meta-analysis objective were obtained through searching electronic databases, such as PubMed, Web of Science and Embase. The data were combined using a random effects model that accounted for differences between studies.

RESULTS

A total of 10 cohorts involving 21,871 patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer were included. Pooled results suggest that compared with those with normoglycemia, oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients with diabetes were associated with a poor overall survival (hazard ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.29-2.22, P < 0.001; I2 = 69%). Subgroup analysis suggested a stronger association between diabetes and poor overall survival in patients aged ≥52 years as compared with those aged <52 years (hazard ratio 2.08 vs 1.34, P = 0.03). Other study characteristics, such as study country, tumor stage or follow-up duration, did not seem to significantly affect the association (P for subgroup difference all >0.05). In addition, diabetes was also associated with a poor progression-free survival of patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer (hazard ratio 1.61, 95% confidence interval 1.30-1.99, P < 0.001; I2 = 9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer might have a poor survival if they have pre-existing diabetes.

Ultrasound Guided Biopsy in Patients With HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To identify the differences in sensitivity and accuracy between ultrasound-guided and palpation-guided fine needle aspirations (FNA) of suspicious lymph nodes in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV) (+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Additional objectives included identifying patient specific factors affecting biopsy accuracy and evaluating potential differences in accuracy between fine and core needle biopsies.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of diagnostic sensitivity was completed at a single tertiary care center between 1/1/2006-12/31/2016. Participants included patients who underwent pretreatment FNA biopsy with HPV(+)OPSCC confirmed pathologically following neck dissection or excisional lymph node biopsy. A true positive (TP) on FNA biopsy was defined as an FNA biopsy concerning for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) that was confirmed on excisional biopsy or neck dissection. A false negative (FN) was defined as a negative FNA but metastatic disease identified on excisional biopsy or neck dissection. Sensitivity was calculated as TPs/(TPs + FNs). Sensitivity was compared among techniques using chi-square and Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

A total of 209 FNA biopsies among 198 patients were included in the study, including 31 (15%) palpation-guided FNAs, 160 (77%) ultrasound-guided FNAs, and 18 (9%) ultrasound-guided FNA + core biopsies. Sensitivity was significantly different among palpation-guided FNA, ultrasound-guided FNA, and ultrasound-guided FNA + core biopsies (48% vs. 83% vs. 94%, respectively; P < .001) but there was no significant difference in sensitivity between ultrasound-guided FNA versus ultrasound-guided FNA + core biopsies (P = .31).

CONCLUSION

The use of ultrasound guidance in FNA biopsies of nodal metastases in HPV(+)OPSCC improves sensitivity compared to palpation guidance alone. Ultrasound guided biopsies are preferred in patients with suspected nodal metastasis from HPV(+)OPSCC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 132:2396-2402, 2022.