Visual Acuity, Retinal Morphology, and Patients' Perceptions after Voretigene Neparvovec-rzyl for RPE65-Associated Retinal Disease

Voretigene neparvovec for inherited retinal dystrophy due to RPE65 mutations: a scoping review of eligibility and treatment challenges from clinical trials to real practice

Biallelic mutations in the RPE65 gene affect nearly 8% of Leber Congenital Amaurosis and 2% of Retinitis Pigmentosa cases. Voretigene neparvovec (VN) is the first gene therapy approach approved for their treatment. To date, real life experience has demonstrated functional improvements following VN treatment, which are consistent with the clinical trials outcomes. However, there is currently no consensus on the characteristics for eligibility for VN treatment. We reviewed relevant literature to explore whether recommendations on patient eligibility can be extrapolated following VN marketing. We screened 166 papers through six research questions, following scoping reviews methodology, to investigate: (1) the clinical and genetic features considered in VN treatment eligibility; (2) the psychophysical tests and imaging modalities used in the pre-treatment and follow-up; (3) the potential correlations between visual function and retinal structure that can be used to define treatment impact on disease progression; (4) retinal degeneration; (5) the most advanced testing modalities; and (6) the impact of surgical procedure on treatment outcomes. Current gaps concerning patients' eligibility in clinical settings, such as pre-treatment characteristics and outcomes are not consistently reported across the studies. No upper limit of retinal degeneration can be defined as the univocal factor in patient eligibility, although evidence suggested that the potential for function rescue is related to the preservation of photoreceptors before treatment. In general, paediatric patients retain more viable cells, present a less severe disease stage and show the highest potential for improvements, making them the most suitable candidates for treatment.

Objective Outcomes to Evaluate Voretigene Neparvovec Treatment Effects in Clinical Practice

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of voretigene neparvovec (VN) treatment by objective fixation stability and chromatic pupillometry testing in clinical practice.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study with longitudinal follow-up.

SUBJECTS

Twelve patients (aged 7-34 years) with RPE65-related inherited retinal dystrophies were treated at the same center with VN in both eyes.

METHODS

Patients treated at the same center with VN were evaluated over a 12-month posttreatment follow-up by subjective and objective tests. Furthermore, patients treated with VN who developed atrophy were compared with those who did not.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), full-field stimulus threshold test (FST), semiautomated kinetic visual field (SKVF), microperimetry, and chromatic pupillometry over a 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Significant improvements of BCVA (P < 0.001), SKVF (P < 0.05), and FST (P < 0.001) were already observed 45 days after treatment and were maintained at the 12-month timepoint. Fixation stability, assessed by microperimetry, improved significantly (P < 0.05) after treatment. Chromatic pupillometry showed significant improvements (P < 0.05) at the 6- and 12-month timepoints. The increase in maximum pupillary constriction significantly (P < 0.001) correlated with higher retinal sensitivity in FST. Four patients developed multifocal retinal atrophy in both eyes, detected at the 6-month timepoint, but this atrophy was not generally associated with worse visual function outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study explores objective outcomes in order to demonstrate the efficacy of VN treatment in addition to the tests normally performed in clinical practice. Our findings show a significant improvement of retinal function both in subjective assessments, such as BCVA, SKVF, and FST, and in objective measurements of fixation stability and maximum pupillary constriction. Moreover, the significant correlation between maximum pupillary constriction and light sensitivity thresholds corroborates the introduction of chromatic pupillometry as an objective test to better assess treatment outcomes in patients with inherited retinal dystrophies.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Single Center Experience with Voretigene Neparvovec Gene Augmentation Therapy in RPE65 Mutation-Associated Inherited Retinal Degeneration in a Clinical Setting

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of baseline data on psychophysical and morphological outcomes of subretinal voretigene neparvovec (VN) (Luxturna, Spark Therapeutics, Inc.) treatment.

DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective, longitudinal, consecutive case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with RPE65-biallelic mutation-associated inherited retinal degeneration (RPE65-IRD) treated between February 2020 and March 2022 with VN and oral immunosuppression according to the manufacturer's recommendation by one surgeon (F.G.H.).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of surgical and clinical records, ancillary testing, and retinal imaging after VN therapy for RPE65-IRD. Descriptive statistics compared data at baseline up to 32 months post-treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low-luminance VA (LLVA), Goldmann visual fields (GVFs), chromatic full-field stimulus threshold (FST) testing (FST), scotopic and photopic 2-color threshold perimetry (2CTP), and multimodal retinal imaging.

RESULTS

Thirty eyes of 19 patients were analyzed (10 pediatric patients < 20 years; 20 adult patients > 20 years of age; overall range: 8-40 years) with a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 1-32). The fovea was completely or partially detached in 16 eyes, attached in 12 eyes, and not assessable in 2 eyes on intraoperative imaging. Median BCVA at baseline was better in the pediatric group (P < 0.05) and did not change significantly independent of age. Meaningful loss of BCVA (≥ 0.3 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR]) occurred in 5 of 18 adult eyes, and a meaningful gain (≥-0.3 logMAR) occurred in 2 of 18 adult and 2 of 8 pediatric eyes. The LLVA and scotopic 2CTP improved considerably in pediatric patients. Scotopic blue FST improved at all ages but more in pediatric patients (8/8 eyes gained ≥ 10 decibels [dB]; P < 0.05). In pediatric patients, median GVF improved by 20% for target V4e and by 50% for target III4e (target I4e not detected). Novel atrophy developed in 13 of 26 eyes at the site of the bleb or peripheral of vascular arcades. Improvements in FST did not correlate with development of chorioretinal atrophy at 12 months. Mean central retinal thickness was 165.87 μm (± 26.26) at baseline (30 eyes) and 157.69 μm (± 30.3) at 12 months (26 eyes). Eight adult patients were treated unilaterally. The untreated eyes did not show meaningful changes during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

These data in a clinical setting show the effectiveness of VN therapy with stable median BCVA and mean retinal thickness and improvements of LLVA, FST, and 2CTP up to 32 months. Treatment effects were superior in the pediatric group. We observed new chorioretinal atrophy in 50% of the treated eyes.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Voretigene Neparvovec: Results up to 2 Years from the Prospective, Registry-Based PERCEIVE Study

Voretigene neparvovec (VN) is the first available gene therapy for patients with biallelic RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophy who have sufficient viable retinal cells. PERCEIVE is an ongoing, post-authorization, prospective, multicenter, registry-based observational study and is the largest study assessing the real-world, long-term safety and effectiveness of VN. Here, we present the outcomes of 103 patients treated with VN according to local prescribing information. The mean (SD) age was 19.5 (10.85) years, 52 (50.5%) were female, and the mean (SD) duration of the follow up was 0.8 (0.64) years (maximum: 2.3 years). Thirty-five patients (34%) experienced ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), most frequently related to chorioretinal atrophy (n = 13 [12.6%]). Eighteen patients (17.5%; 24 eyes [13.1%]) experienced ocular TEAEs of special interest, including intraocular inflammation and/or infection related to the procedure (n = 7). The mean (SD) changes from baseline in full-field light-sensitivity threshold testing (white light) at month 1, month 6, year 1, and year 2 were -16.59 (13.48) dB (51 eyes), -18.24 (14.62) dB (42 eyes), -15.84 (14.10) dB (10 eyes), and -13.67 (22.62) dB (13 eyes), respectively. The change in visual acuity from baseline was not clinically significant. Overall, the outcomes of the PERCEIVE study are consistent with the findings of VN pivotal clinical trials.

Full-field stimulus threshold testing: a scoping review of current practice

The full-field stimulus threshold (FST) is a psychophysical measure of whole-field retinal light sensitivity. It can assess residual visual function in patients with severe retinal disease and is increasingly being adopted as an endpoint in clinical trials. FST applications in routine ophthalmology clinics are also growing, but as yet there is no formalised standard guidance for measuring FST. This scoping review explored current variability in FST conduct and reporting, with an aim to inform further evidence synthesis and consensus guidance. A comprehensive electronic search and review of the literature was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Key source, participant, methodology and outcomes data from 85 included sources were qualitatively and quantitatively compared and summarised. Data from 85 sources highlight how the variability and insufficient reporting of FST methodology, including parameters such as units of flash luminance, colour, duration, test strategy and dark adaptation, can hinder comparison and interpretation of clinical significance across centres. The review also highlights an unmet need for paediatric-specific considerations for test optimisation. Further evidence synthesis, empirical research or structured panel consultation may be required to establish coherent standardised guidance on FST methodology and context or condition dependent modifications. Consistent reporting of core elements, most crucially the flash luminance equivalence to 0 dB reference level is a first step. The development of criteria for quality assurance, calibration and age-appropriate reference data generation may further strengthen rigour of measurement.

Bilateral exudative retinal detachments after subretinal gene therapy with voretigene neparvovec-rzyl for RPE65 Leber Congenital Amaurosis

Purpose

To report panuveitis with exudative retinal detachments in a healthy 27-year-old woman with biallelic mutations in the RPE65 gene, who underwent bilateral sequential gene therapy with subretinal administration of voretigene neparvovec-rzyl.

Observations

Visual acuity improved for 30 days after surgery as oral corticosteroids were tapered. At postoperative week 6, vision declined due to sudden onset uveitis and exudative retinal detachments in both eyes. HLA Class II typing revealed the haplotype associated with sympathetic ophthalmia and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH). The inflammation improved after corticosteroid, mycophenolate mofetil, and adalimumab therapy while vision remained poor.

Conclusions and Importance

Surgically-induced sympathetic ophthalmia is a plausible explanation for the clinical findings; surgery of both eyes within one week would conceal the inciting eye. VKH or inflammation related to the gene therapy are other possible etiologies but severe bilateral panuveitis has not been reported with voretigene neparvovec-rzyl. Informed consent for gene therapy surgery should include a discussion of the rare complication of sympathetic ophthalmia following vitrectomy surgery.

Update on gene therapies in pediatric ophthalmology

Rare eye diseases encompass a broad spectrum of genetic anomalies with or without additional extraocular manifestations. Genetic eye disorders in pediatric patients often lead to severe visual impairments. Therefore, a challenge of gene therapy is to provide better vision to these affected children. In recent years, inherited retinal diseases, inherited optic neuropathies, and corneal dystrophies have dominated discussions to establish gene and cell replacement therapies for these diseases. Gene therapy involves the transfer of genetic material to remove, replace, repair, or introduce a gene, or to overexpress a protein, whose activity would have a therapeutic impact. For the majority of anterior segment diseases, these studies are still emerging at a preclinical stage; however, for inherited retinal disorders, translation has been reached, leading to the introduction of the first gene therapies into clinical practice. In the past decade, the first gene therapy for biallelic RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophy has been developed and the FDA and EMA both approved ocular gene therapy. Other promising approaches by intravitreal injection have been investigated such as in CEP290-Leber congenital amaurosis. Various techniques of gene therapies include gene supplementation, CRISPR-based genome editing, as well as RNA modulation and optogenetics. Optogenetic therapies deliver light-activated ion channels to surviving retinal cell types in order to restore photosensitivity. Beyond retinal function, ataluren, a nonsense mutation suppression therapy, enables ribosomal read-through of mRNA containing premature termination codons, resulting in the production of a full-length protein. An ophthalmic formulation was recently evaluated with the aim of repairing corneal damage, pending new clinical studies. However, various congenital disorders exhibit severe developmental defects or cell loss at birth, limiting the potential for viral gene therapy. Therefore mutation-independent strategies seem promising for maintaining the survival of photoreceptors or for restoring visual function. Restoring vision in children with gene therapy continues to be a challenge in ophthalmology. © 2023 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of French Society of Pediatrics.

Safety and Efficacy of Adeno-Associated Viral Gene Therapy in Patients With Retinal Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of ocular gene therapy using adeno-associated virus (AAV).

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched systematically for controlled or non-controlled interventional gene therapy studies using key words related to retinal diseases, gene therapy, and AAV vectors. The primary outcome measure was safety, based on ocular severe adverse events (SAEs). Secondary outcome measures evaluated efficacy of the therapy based on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and improvements in visual sensitivity and systemic involvement following ocular delivery. Pooling was done using a DerSimonian Laird random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, version 1.

Results

Our search identified 3548 records. Of these, 80 publications met eligibility criteria, representing 28 registered clinical trials and 5 postmarket surveillance studies involving AAV gene therapy for Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), choroideremia, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), retinitis pigmentosa (RP), X-linked retinoschisis, and achromatopsia. Overall, AAV therapy vectors were associated with a cumulative incidence of at least one SAE of 8% (95% confidence intervals [CIs] of 5% to 12%). SAEs were often associated with the surgical procedure rather than the therapeutic vector itself. Poor or inconsistent reporting of adverse events (AEs) were a limitation for the meta-analysis. The proportion of patients with any improvement in BCVA and visual sensitivity was 41% (95% CIs of 31% to 51%) and 51% (95% CIs of 31% to 70%), respectively. Systemic immune involvement was associated with a cumulative incidence of 31% (95% CI = 21% to 42%).

Conclusions

AAV gene therapy vectors appear to be safe but the surgical procedure required to deliver them is associated with some risk. The large variability in efficacy can be attributed to the small number of patients treated, the heterogeneity of the population and the variability in dosage, volume, and follow-up.

Translational Relevance

This systematic review will help to inform and guide future clinical trials.

Gene therapies in pediatric ophthalmology

Genetic pediatric eye disease frequently leads to severe vision impairment or blindness. Voretigene neparvovec is the first approved gene therapy for an inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD). Voretigene neparvovec has been shown to be well tolerated and safe, with encouraging results in terms of efficacy, mainly when administered early in childhood. While we assisted at the first gene therapy available in clinical practice for an IRD, some questions remain unanswered, especially when gene therapy is delivered in young children. We review here the most recent reports and promising ongoing studies concerning various approaches on gene therapy in pediatric ophthalmology.

Quality of Life and Economic Impacts of Retinitis Pigmentosa on Japanese Patients: A Non-interventional Cross-sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is an inherited progressive disease, characterized by a loss of photoreceptors, and is the second leading cause of visual impairment in Japan. RP is currently incurable and can result in complete blindness, with affected patients typically experiencing a gradual loss of light sensitivity, visual field, and visual acuity. Identification of any unmet medical needs of patients with this condition requires an understanding of the impacts of RP; in this study, we surveyed Japanese patients with RP to investigate the quality of life and economic impacts of visual impairment.

METHODS

This non-interventional, cross-sectional study surveyed Japanese patients with RP. Economic impact was measured using an original questionnaire that assessed out-of-pocket cost (e.g., vision aids and medical services), salary gap with the general public, and the cost of depression and anxiety. Worker productivity was assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI). Quality of life was evaluated using the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25), and the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L). The primary outcome was direct and indirect costs of visual impairment or blindness during the lifetime of patients with RP.

RESULTS

Among 122 surveyed patients with RP, the estimated annual cost per patient was 218,520 yen (2176 USD), and the estimated lifetime cost per patient was 18,523,909 yen (184,501 USD). Additional robustness testing increased the estimated annual cost and lifetime cost per patient to 783,176 yen (7801 USD) and 66,389,827 yen (661,253 USD), respectively. In working patients, work productivity loss was 26.2% per person and impairment of daily activities was 31.6% per person. The mean VFQ-25, HUI3, and EQ-5D-5L scores were 42.0, 0.393, and 0.833, respectively.

CONCLUSION

RP imposed a heavy economic burden and negative quality of life impacts in Japanese patients.

Voretigene Neparvovec for the Treatment of RPE65-associated Retinal Dystrophy: Consensus and Recommendations from the Korea RPE65-IRD Consensus Paper Committee

Mutations in the RPE65 gene, associated with Leber congenital amaurosis, early-onset severe retinal dystrophy, and retinitis pigmentosa, gained growing attention since gene therapy for patients with RPE65-associated retinal dystrophy is available in clinical practice. RPE65 gene accounts for a very small proportion of patients with inherited retinal degeneration, especially Asian patients. Because RPE65-associated retinal dystrophy shares common clinical characteristics, such as early-onset severe nyctalopia, nystagmus, low vision, and progressive visual field constriction, with retinitis pigmentosa by other genetic mutations, appropriate genetic testing is essential to make a correct diagnosis. Also, fundus abnormalities can be minimal in early childhood, and the phenotype is highly variable depending on the type of mutations in RPE65-associated retinal dystrophy, which makes a diagnostic difficulty. The aim of this paper is to review the epidemiology of RPE65-associated retinal dystrophy, mutation spectrum, genetic diagnosis, clinical characteristics, and voretigene neparvovec, a gene therapy product for the treatment of RPE65-related retinal dystrophy.

Current Management of Patients with RPE65 Mutation Associated Inherited Retinal Degenerations in Europe: Results of a 2-Year Follow-Up Multinational Survey

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the current management of RPE65 biallelic mutation-associated inherited retinal degeneration (RPE65-IRD) in Europe since market authorization of voretigene neparvovec (VN, LuxturnaTM) in 2018. By July 2022, over 200 patients have been treated outside the USA, of whom about 90% in Europe. We conducted among all centers of the European Vision Institute Clinical Research Network www.evicr.net and health care providers (HCPs) of the European Reference Network dedicated to Rare Eye Diseases (ERN-EYE) the second multinational survey on management of IRDs in Europe elaborated by www.evicr.net with a special focus on RPE65-IRD.

METHODS

An electronic survey questionnaire with 48 questions specifically addressing RPE65-IRD (2019 survey 35) was developed and sent by June 2021 to 95 www.evicr.net centers and 40 ERN-EYE HCPs and affiliated members. Of note, 11 centers are members of both networks. Statistical analysis was performed with Excel and R.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 44% (55/124); 26 centers follow RPE65 biallelic mutation-associated IRD patients. By June 2021, 8/26 centers have treated 57 RPE65-IRD cases (1-19/center, median 6) and 43 planned for treatment (range 0-10/center, median 6). The overall age range was 3-52 years, and on average 22% of the patients did not (yet) qualify for treatment (range 2-60%/center, median 15%). Main reasons were too advanced (range 0-100, median 75%) or mild disease (range 0-100, median 0). Eighty-three percent of centers (10/12) that follow RPE65 mutation-associated IRD patients treated with VN participate in the PERCEIVE registry (EUPAS31153, www.encepp.eu. Quality of life and full-field stimulus test improvements had the highest scores of the survey-reported outcome parameters in VN treatment follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This second multinational survey on management of RPE65-IRD by www.evicr.net centers and ERN-EYE HCPs in Europe indicates that RPE65-IRD might be diagnosed more reliably in 2021 compared to 2019. By June 2021, 8/26 centers reported detailed results including VN treatment. Main reasons for non-treatment were too advanced or mild disease, followed by absence of 2 class 4 or 5 mutations on both alleles or because of a too young age. Patient satisfaction with treatment was estimated to be high by 50% of the centers.

Therapy with voretigene neparvovec. How to measure success?

Retinal gene supplementation therapy such as the first approved one, voretigene neparvovec, delivers a functioning copy of the missing gene enabling the protein transcription in retinal cells and restore visual functions. After gene supplementation for the genetic defect, a complex network of functional regeneration is the consequence, whereas the extent is very individualized. Diagnostic and functional testings that have been used routinely by ophthalmologists so far to define the correct diagnosis, cannot be applied in the new context of defining small, sometimes subtle changes in visual functions. New view on retinal diagnostics is needed to understand this processes that define safety and efficacy of the treatment. Not only does vision have many aspects that must be addressed by specific evaluations and imaging techniques, but objective readouts of local retinal function for rods and cones separately have been an unmet need until recently. A reliable test-retest variability is necessary in rare diseases such as inherited retinal dystrophies, because statistics are often not applicable due to a low number of participants. Methods for a reliable individual evaluation of the therapy success are needed. In this manuscript we present an elaboration on retinal diagnostics combining psychophysics (eg. full-field stimulus threshold or dark adapted perimetry) as well as objective measures for local retinal function (eg. photopic and scotopic chromatic pupil campimetry) and retinal imaging for a meaningful workflow to apply in evaluation of the individual success in patients receiving gene therapy for photoreceptor diseases.

Gene Therapy with Voretigene Neparvovec Improves Vision and Partially Restores Electrophysiological Function in Pre-School Children with Leber Congenital Amaurosis

Leber congenital amaurosis caused by mutations in the RPE65 gene belongs to the most severe early-onset hereditary childhood retinopathies naturally progressing to legal blindness. The novel gene therapy voretigene neparvovec is the first approved causative treatment option for this devastating eye disease and is specifically designed to treat RPE65-mediated retinal dystrophies. Herein, we present a follow-up of the youngest treated patients in Germany so far, including four pre-school children who received treatment with voretigene neparvovec at a single treatment center between January 2020 and May 2022. All patients underwent pars plana vitrectomy with circumferential peeling of the internal limiting membrane at the injection site and subretinal injection of voretigene neparvovec. Pre- and postoperative diagnostics included imaging (spectral domain optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, fundus wide-angle imaging), electrophysiologic examination (ERG), retinal light sensitivity measurements (FST) and visual acuity testing. Behavioral changes were assessed using a questionnaire and by observing the children's vision-guided behavior in different levels of illumination. All children showed marked increase in vision-guided behavior shortly after therapy, as well as marked increase in visual acuity in the postoperative course up to full visual acuity in one child. Two eyes showed partial electrophysiological recovery of an ERG that was undetectable before treatment-a finding that has not been described in humans before.

Visual function and retinal changes after voretigene neparvovec treatment in children with biallelic RPE65-related inherited retinal dystrophy

To report quantitative retinal changes assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in children treated with voretigene neparvovec (VN) at a single center in Italy. Retrospective review of six consecutive pediatric patients with biallelic RPE65-related dystrophy treated bilaterally with VN. SD-OCT scans were analyzed to extract Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) thickness maps of the whole retina and the outer nuclear layer (ONL). Changes in visual function were assessed by best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and retinal morphology at Days 30/45 and 180. BCVA significantly improved at Day 30/45 and 6 months (both P < 0.001). Central foveal retinal thickness and central foveal ONL thickness tended to increase (6.4 ± 19.2 µm; P = 0.080 and 3.42 ± 7.68 µm; P = 0.091, respectively). ONL thickness of the internal ETDRS-ring significantly increased at day 30/45 (4.7 ± 8.4 µm; P < 0.001) and day 180 (5.0 ± 5.7 µm; P = 0.009). Intra-operative foveal detachment was not associated with a higher function gain in terms of BCVA, but with a mild thinning of foveal ONL after treatment. The improvement of BCVA and thickening of the ONL layer suggest that improvement of visual acuity could be related to partial recovery of retinal morphology in the perifoveal ring.

Advancements in ocular gene therapy delivery: vectors and subretinal, intravitreal, and suprachoroidal techniques

INTRODUCTION

: Ocular gene therapy represents fertile ground for rapid innovation, with ever-expanding therapeutic strategies, molecular targets, and indications.

AREAS COVERED

: Potential indications for ocular gene therapy have classically focused on inherited retinal disease (IRD), but more recently include acquired retinal diseases, such as neovascular age-related macular degeneration, geographic atrophy and diabetic retinopathy. Ocular gene therapy strategies have proliferated recently, and include gene augmentation, gene inactivation, gene editing, RNA modulation, and gene-independent gene augmentation. Viral vector therapeutic constructs include adeno-associated virus and lentivirus and continue to evolve through directed evolution and rationale design. Ocular gene therapy administration techniques have expanded beyond pars plana vitrectomy with subretinal injection to intravitreal injection and suprachoroidal injection.

EXPERT OPINION

: The success of treatment for IRD, paired with the promise of clinical research in acquired retinal diseases and in administration techniques, has raised the possibility of in-office gene therapy for common retinal disorders within the next five to ten years.

Gene Therapy for Rhodopsin Mutations

Mutations in RHO, the gene for rhodopsin, account for a large fraction of autosomal-dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP). Patients fall into two clinical classes, those with early onset, pan retinal photoreceptor degeneration, and those who experience slowly progressive disease. The latter class of patients are candidates for photoreceptor-directed gene therapy, while former may be candidates for delivery of light-responsive proteins to interneurons or retinal ganglion cells. Gene therapy for RHO adRP may be targeted to the mutant gene at the DNA or RNA level, while other therapies preserve the viability of photoreceptors without addressing the underlying mutation. Correcting the RHO gene and replacing the mutant RNA show promise in animal models, while sustaining viable photoreceptors has the potential to delay the loss of central vision and may preserve photoreceptors for gene-directed treatments.