Developmental dysplasia of the hip: is acetabular retroversion a crucial factor?

Acetabular Retroversion: Dysplasia in Disguise that Leads to Early Arthritis of the Hip

We aimed to assess the prevalence of acetabular retroversion (AR) in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THA) based on age. We retrospectively compared preoperative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of patients younger than 40 years of age who underwent THA with the age- and body mass index-matched control of 40 years and older patients. Retroversion was determined based on the presence of cross-over sign, ischial spine sign, posterior wall sign, and elephant's ear sign with data stratified based on presence of dysplasia.

Outcomes for the Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Acetabular Retroversion: A 3D Computed Tomography Analysis

BACKGROUND

Increased attention has been directed toward the acetabular morphology in the management of patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Whether acetabular version influences patient-reported outcomes remains poorly understood.

PURPOSE

To use computed tomography (CT)-based 3-dimensional (3D) bone models to (1) quantify acetabular version in patients with FAIS, (2) compare acetabular version on 3D bone models with current plain radiographic parameters, and (3) explore the relationship between the magnitude of acetabular version and minimum 2-year clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Three-dimensional models of the pelvis and femur were generated by semiautomated segmentation and aligned to a standard coordinate system. Acetabular version was quantified at the 3-o'clock position, and 3 groups were identified: acetabular retroversion (AR; <15°), normal acetabular version (NV; 15°-25°), and acetabular anteversion (AA; >25°). Patient demographic characteristics, plain radiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes were analyzed, including the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Preoperative CT scans were acquired in 105 consecutive patients before hip arthroscopy for FAIS, of which 84 (80.0%) completed minimum 2-year patient-reported outcomes. The mean ± SD age and body mass index of patients were 33.9 ± 12.6 years and 26.0 ± 5.4, respectively; 70.2% were female. The number of patients and the mean central acetabular version within each group were as follows: AR (n = 12; 11.3°± 2.7°), NV (n = 56; 20.7°± 2.9°), and AA (n = 16; 28.5°± 2.7°). Posterior wall sign was the only plain radiographic parameter that was significantly more observed in the AR group than in the other 2 groups. At minimum 2-year follow-up, significant between-group differences in the mHHS, iHOT-12, and VAS for pain and satisfaction (P < .05) were appreciated, while post hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction (P < .0167) found lower scores on the mHHS, iHOT-12, and VAS for pain and satisfaction in patients with AR as compared with NV. Lower scores on the VAS for satisfaction were reported in patients with AR when compared with AA (P = .006) but not on the mHHS (P = .023), iHOT-12 (P = .032), or VAS for pain (P = .072).

CONCLUSION

Traditional plain radiographic indices to describe AR, including crossover sign and ischial spine sign, were not reliable in defining AR according to 3D models derived from CT scans. Only the posterior wall sign was observed in a higher proportion in the AR group. Patients with AR demonstrated inferior outcomes when compared with patients with NV and AA after hip arthroscopy for FAIS.

Addressing intraarticular pathology at the time of anteverting periacetabular osteotomy for acetabular retroversion is associated with better short-term patient-reported outcomes

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is effective in the management of developmental dysplasia of the hip and femoroacetabular impingement secondary to acetabular retroversion. During anteverting PAO for acetabular retroversion, the need for both labral treatment and femoral head–neck junction osteochondroplasty remains equivocal. Accordingly, this study evaluated patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and reoperation rates after anteverting PAO with or without intraarticular intervention. Cases of anteverting PAO performed at a single institution between November 2009 and January 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups: no intervention and intraarticular intervention with arthrotomy or arthroscopy. Subsequently, patients were reclassified by the intraarticular procedure performed at surgery into major (labral repair, femoral head–neck osteochondroplasty) and minor (labral debridement, femoral/acetabular chondroplasty) groups. The cohort was 75% female, median age was 19.5 years and mean body mass index was 25.0 kg/m². Preoperative to postoperative improvement was compared to minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for eight PROM. Patients receiving major interventions exceeded MCID in a greater proportion of PROM compared to minor and no intervention groups (P < 0.007); major or minor interventions did not increase the risk of reoperation over no intervention (P ≥ 0.39). Based on the current data, surgeons performing anteverting PAO for acetabular retroversion should perform arthroscopic or open labral repair and assess for impingement after the correction and perform a head–neck junction osteochondroplasty if indicated.

Arthroscopic Treatment and Outcomes of Borderline Dysplasia With Acetabular Retroversion: A Matched-Control Study From the MASH Study Group

BACKGROUND

Although acetabular retroversion (AR) occurs in dysplasia, management of the crossover sign (COS) or outcomes in borderline dysplasia (BD) with AR have not been reported.

PURPOSE

To report any differences in the management of the COS in BD and nondysplastic hips and to report comparative outcomes of BD with AR with matched controls with BD or AR (ie, focal pincer femoroacetabular impingement [FAI]).

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A multicenter matched-pair study was performed with data from a large prospectively collected database. Inclusion criteria were patients who had undergone primary unilateral hip arthroscopy including labral repair for FAI and/or chondral pathology without significant osteoarthritis (ie, Tönnis grade 0 or 1). The study group (BD+AR) was defined radiographically by lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) on standing anteroposterior pelvis of 18° to 25° and positive COS. A 1:1:1 matching on age, sex, and body mass index was performed with a control group with BD and another control group with AR (LCEA, >25°+COS). Acetabuloplasty rates were determined for each group. Mean 2-year outcomes including the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), minimally clinical important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) scores were compared. Subanalysis of the study group both with and without acetabuloplasty was performed.

RESULTS

There were 69 patients, with 23 in the study group and 23 in each control group. The effect of dysplasia with or without the presence of the COS resulted in changes in acetabuloplasty rates, with 0% performed in the BD group, 35% in the BD+AR study group, and 91% in the AR group (P = .001). Arthroscopic outcomes demonstrated similar and significant mean 2-year improvement of iHOT-12 patient-reported outcomes, MCID, SCB, and PASS scores in the study and both control groups. There was a trend within the study group toward greater postoperative iHOT-12 scores in patients who received anterior-based acetabuloplasty than those who did not receive acetabuloplasty (81.7 and 70.4, respectively; P = .11).

CONCLUSION

Acetabular coverage influences the management of the COS, with significantly lower acetabuloplasty rates in BD with AR compared with AR without BD (focal pincer impingement). Symptomatic patients with combined BD and AR had similar significant successful outcomes to those of patients with BD and those with AR (focal pincer impingement), whether treated without acetabuloplasty or, less frequently, with limited anterior-based acetabuloplasty.

Iliopsoas Impingement After Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Treatment Options

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence, natural history, response to treatment, and risk factors for anterior iliopsoas impingement (AIPI) after direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

Between January 1, 2009 and January 4, 2014, 600 patients (655 hips) who underwent primary DAA THA were retrospectively reviewed. AIPI incidence was calculated. Natural history and response to a stepwise treatment approach was assessed. Radiographic anterior acetabular component overhang was measured. Asymptomatic controls were used to identify risk factors for the development of AIPI.

RESULTS

In total, 518 patients (559 hips) met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of AIPI was 32/559 (5.7%). Symptom resolution occurred in 22/32 (68.8%) patients at final follow-up. Nonoperative management was successful in 15/32 (46.9%) patients. Operative intervention resulted in symptom resolution in 5/8 (62.5%) patients. On univariate analysis, female gender (odds ratio [OR] 2.79), acetabular component to native femoral head diameter ratio above 1.1 (OR 3.85), and any measurable overhang (OR 7.07) significantly raised the risk of AIPI, while increasing native femoral head diameter was protective for AIPI (OR 0.83).

CONCLUSION

AIPI is a cause of groin pain after DAA THA, which often improves with conservative measures. Significant predisposing factors for AIPI include female gender, small native femoral head diameter, increased acetabular component to femoral head diameter ratio, and most notably, any measurable acetabular component overhang.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

The Ischial Spine in Developmental Hip Dysplasia: Unraveling the Role of Acetabular Retroversion in Periacetabular Osteotomy

PURPOSE

Radiological diagnosis of acetabular retroversion (AR) is based on the presence of the crossover sign (COS), the posterior wall sign (PWS), and the prominence of the ischial spine sign (PRISS). The primary purpose of the study is to analyze the clinical significance of the PRISS in a sample of dysplastic hips requiring periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) and evaluate retroversion in symptomatic hip dysplasia.

METHODS

In a previous paper, we reported the classic coxometric measurements of 178 patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia undergoing PAO where retroversion was noted in 42% of the cases and was not found to be a major factor in the appearance of symptoms. In the current study, we have added the retroversion signs PRISS and PWS to our analysis. Among the retroverted dysplastic hips, we studied the association of the PRISS with the hips requiring PAO. We also defined the ischial spine index (ISI) and studied its relationship to the coxometric measurements and AR.

RESULTS

In hips with AR, the operated hips were significantly associated with the PRISS compared to the nonoperated ones (χ ² = 4.847). Additionally, the ISI was able to classify acetabular version (anteverted, neutral, and retroverted acetabula). A direct correlation between the ISI and the retroversion index (RI) was found, and the highest degree of retroversion was found when the 3 signs of acetabular retroversion were concomitantly present (RI = 33.6%).

CONCLUSION

The PRISS, a radiographic sign reflecting AR, was found to be significantly associated with dysplastic hips requiring PAO where AR was previously not considered a factor in the manifestation of symptoms and subsequent requirement for surgery. Moreover, the PRISS can also serve as an adequate radiographic sign for estimating acetabular version on pelvic radiographs.

The relationship between radiographic findings and patient-reported outcomes in adult hip dysplasia patients: A hospital cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to clarify the relationship of individual radiographic parameters and features with the patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) of patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in a hospital-referred cross-sectional analysis.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 108 Japanese DDH patients (female, n = 88; male, n = 20; mean age, 43.4 years). We recorded the CE angle, angle of Sharp, ARO, ADR, AHI, crossover sign, pistol grip deformity, and femoral head-neck ratio, which were measured on the AP view, and the α-angle, which was measured on the Lauenstein view. We also recorded cyst formation and osteophytes on either view. We used the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire (JHEQ) to assess the PROMs. The PROMs of patients with and without cysts or osteophytes and those of patients with or without cam or pincer deformity were compared. The relationships between specific PROMs and radiographic features were evaluated with a linear regression analysis and independent associations between PROMs and radiographic features were assessed with a multiple regression analysis using various independent variables.

RESULTS

The JHEQ movement and mental values in patients with cyst formation were significantly lower in comparison to those in patients without cyst formation. The JHEQ subscale values did not differ according to the presence or absence of osteophytes, cam deformity or pincer deformity. The CE angle was found to be associated with the JHEQ movement score in the linear regression analysis. To identify radiographic features that were independently associated with each of the JHEQ subscale scores, we performed a multiple regression analysis with age, body mass index, sex and the number of affected hip joints (bilateral or unilateral) included as independent variables. The CE angle was found to be independently associated with JHEQ movement.

CONCLUSION

The CE angle was independently associated with the JHEQ movement value.

Spinopelvic Characteristics in Acetabular Retroversion: Does Pelvic Tilt Change After Periacetabular Osteotomy?

BACKGROUND

Acetabular retroversion may lead to impingement and pain, which can be treated with an anteverting periacetabular osteotomy (aPAO). Pelvic tilt influences acetabular orientation; as pelvic tilt angle reduces, acetabular version reduces. Thus, acetabular retroversion may be a deformity secondary to abnormal pelvic tilt (functional retroversion) or an anatomic deformity of the acetabulum and the innominate bone (pelvic ring).

PURPOSE

To (1) measure the spinopelvic morphology in patients with acetabular retroversion and (2) assess whether pelvic tilt changes after successful anteverting PAO (aPAO), thus testing whether preoperative pelvic tilt was compensatory.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A consecutive cohort of 48 hips (42 patients; 30 ± 7 years [mean ± SD]) with acetabular retroversion that underwent successful aPAO was studied. Spinopelvic morphology (pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, anterior pelvic plane, and sacral slope) was measured from computed tomography scans including the sacral end plate in 21 patients, with adequate images. In addition, the change in pelvic tilt with aPAO was measured via the sacrofemoral-pubic angle with supine pelvic radiographs at an interval of 2.5 ± 2 years.

RESULTS

The spinopelvic characteristics included a pelvic tilt of 4° ± 4°, a sacral slope of 39° ± 9°, an anterior pelvic plane angle of 11° ± 5°, and a pelvic incidence of 42° ± 10°. Preoperative pelvic tilt was 4° ± 4° and did not change postoperatively (4° ± 4°) (P = .676).

CONCLUSION

Pelvic tilt in acetabular retroversion was within normal parameters, illustrating "normal" sagittal pelvic balance and values similar to those reported in the literature in healthy subjects. In addition, it did not change after aPAO. Thus, acetabular retroversion was not secondary to a maladaptive pelvic tilt (functional retroversion). Further work is required to assess whether retroversion is a reflection of a pelvic morphological abnormality rather than an isolated acetabular abnormality. Treatment of acetabular retroversion should focus on correcting the deformity rather than attempting to change the functional pelvic position.

Does acetabular dysplasia affect outcome in arthroscopic treatment of cam femoroacetabular impingement? Case-control study with and without acetabular dysplasia

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is classically contraindicated when acetabular dysplasia is associated, although this is controversial in case of moderate dysplasia or isolated cam effect. A case-control study was therefore conducted comparing borderline (center-edgeangle (CEA), 20-24°), moderate (15-19°) and severe dysplasia (<15°) (group D) versus a control group with normal acetabular cover (CEA, 25-30°). The aims were 1) to determine functional results and satisfaction, and 2) to correlate functional results with severity of dysplasia and of cam effect.

HYPOTHESIS

Improvement in functional scores and satisfaction is lower in group D than in controls, due to non-correction of dysplasia.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A single-center, single-surgeon retrospective comparative case-control study included all patients with isolated cam-effect FAI and dysplasia but without osteoarthritis (group D) or with isolated cam-effect FAI without dysplasia (controls) operated on during the study period. Cases of mixed impingement were excluded. Preoperative and last-follow-up functional variables included McCarthy's modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Christensen's Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS).

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2014, details of 407 patients operated on by arthroscopy were entered in a data-base. Twenty patients (22 hips) were included in group D, with CEA<25° (mean, 19±3.1; range, 10-23°). The control group comprised 23 patients (25 hips) with CEA>25° (mean, 29±2.1°; range, 25-30°) matched for gender, age and body-mass index. Mean follow-up was 29.6±14.1 months (range, 14-58 months) in group D and 31.4±10.6 months (range, 15-57 months) in the control group (p=0.66). For functional scores, the two groups showed respectively 9.9 (-34 to +47) (p=0.038) and 10.4 (-20 to +48) (p=0.0038) gain in mHHS (non-significant: p=0.943). Mean gain in NAHS was 16.6 (-19 to +33) (p=0.0001) and 13.7 (-11 to +47) (p=0.0002), respectively (non-significant: p=0.56) CONCLUSION: Short-term functional results for cam FAI treatment were equivalent with<25° acetabular cover (mean, 19°; range, 13-24°) or normal cover. Longer-term assessment is indispensable to determine the impact of dysplasia and its severity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, case-control study.

Acetabular retroversion: Diagnosis and treatment

Acetabular retroversion (AR) consists of a malorientation of the acetabulum in the sagittal plane. AR is associated with changes in load transmission across the hip, being a risk factor for early osteoarthrosis. The pathophysiological basis of AR is an anterior acetabular hyper-coverage and an overall pelvic rotation.

The delay or the non-diagnosis of AR could have an impact in the overall management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). AR is a subtype of (focal) pincer deformity.

The objective of this review was to clarify the pathophysiological, diagnosis and treatment fundaments inherent to AR, using a current literature review.

Radiographic evaluation is paramount in AR: the cross-over, the posterior wall and ischial spine signs are classic radiographic signs of AR. However, computed tomography (CT) evaluation permits a three-dimensional characterization of the deformity, being more reliable in its recognition.

Acetabular rim trimming (ART) and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) are the best described surgical options for the treatment of AR.

The clinical outcomes of both techniques are dependent on the correct characterization of existing lesions and adequate selection of patients.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:595-603. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180015

Female Sex Is a Risk Factor for Failure of Hip Arthroscopy Performed for Acetabular Retroversion

Background:

The success of hip surgery in treating acetabular retroversion depends on the severity of the structural deformity and on selecting the correct patient for open or arthroscopic procedures.

Purpose:

To compare a group of patients with retroverted hips treated successfully with hip arthroscopy with a group of patients with retroverted hips that failed arthroscopic surgery, with special emphasis on (1) patient characteristics, (2) perioperative radiographic parameters, (3) intraoperative findings and concomitant procedures, and (4) patient sex.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 47 adult patients (47 hips) with acetabular retroversion who had undergone hip arthroscopy. Retroversion was based on the presence of an ischial spine sign in addition to either a crossover or posterior wall sign on a well-positioned anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. A total of 24 hips (50%) (16 females, 8 males; mean patient age, 31 years) had failed arthroscopy, defined as modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) <80 or need for subsequent procedure. Twenty-three hips (8 females, 15 males; mean patient age, 29 years) were considered successful, defined as having no subsequent procedures and an mHHS >80 at the time of most recent follow-up. Perioperative variables, radiographic characteristics, and intraoperative findings were compared between the groups, in addition to a subgroup analysis based on sex.

Results:

The mean follow-up for successful hips was 30 months (SD, 11 months), with a mean mHHS of 95. In the failure group, 6 patients required subsequent procedures (4 anteverting periacetabular osteotomies and 2 total hip arthroplasties). The mean overall time to failure was 21 months, and the mean time to a second procedure was 24 months (total hip arthroplasty, 29.5 months; periacetabular osteotomy, 21.2 months); 18 hips failed on the basis of a low mHHS (mean, 65; range, 27-79) at last follow-up. Factors significantly different between the success and failure groups included patient sex, with males being more likely than females to have a successful outcome (P < .02), as well as undergoing femoral osteoplasty (P < .02). Intraoperative variables that were associated with worse outcome included isolated labral debridement (P < .002). In a subgroup analysis, males were more likely than their female counterparts to have a successful outcome with both isolated cam and combined cam-pincer resection (P < .05). Level of crossover correction on postoperative radiographs had no correlation with outcome.

Conclusion:

Acetabular retroversion remains a challenging pathoanatomy to treat arthroscopically. If hip arthroscopy is to be considered in select cases, we recommend labral preservation when possible. Male patients with correction of cam deformities did well, while females with significant retroversion appeared to be at greater risk for failure of arthroscopic treatment.

Radiographic outcomes following femoroacetabular impingement correction with open surgical management: a systematic review

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause of hip pain, and open surgical approaches remain an important treatment option for FAI. This systematic review of the literature sought to determine what post-operative radiographic outcomes have been reported following open surgical correction of FAI. After screening and full-text review, 18 studies involving 1192 hips in 1084 patients were included for analysis. In total, 24 radiological outcomes were reported. CAM-type FAI was most frequently assessed using the alpha angle (61.1 %) and head-neck offset/head-neck offset ratio (33.3 %). Lateral center edge angle (27.8 %) and the acetabular index (22.2 %) were the most commonly reported outcomes for pincer-type FAI. The results of this review suggest that reporting of post-operative radiographic outcomes is variable, that no single radiographic parameter is optimal, and that the clinician must use a combination of reproducible measurements, together with their clinical examination, to confirm adequate restoration of normal hip morphology.

Is labral hypotrophy correlated with increased acetabular depth?

Labral hypertrophy is a distinct feature in hip dysplasia. Occasionally, very small, hypotrophic labra are observed. However, there is no literature concerning this pathology. We investigated if the size of the labrum correlated with any radiologic parameters reflecting the amount of acetabular coverage. It was hypothezised that there is a negative correlation between labrum size and acetabular coverage. Labra were categorized into three groups depending on the relation between length of the articular sided surface and height of bony attachment. Labra with a height:length ratio of 2 were classified as hypotrophic, with a height:length ratio of 1 as normal and with a ratio of 0.5 as hypertrophic. Labral cross-sectional areas (CSA) were measured on radial magnetic resonance imaging-arthrography slices using the measuring tool of the PACS system of 20 hips with hypotrophic labra (group 1), 20 hips with normal labral appearance (group 2) and 10 hips with hypertrophic labra (group 3). These values were then analyzed against following parameters: neck-shaft-angle (NSA), lateral center-edge angle (LCE), acetabular index (AI), femoral extrusion index (FEI) and acetabular retroversion index (ARI). Analyses of variance were used to determine differences in mean values between the three groups. Mean labral CSA differed significantly between all groups (group 1: 12.1 ± 2.9 mm²; group 2: 25.2 ± 6.2 mm²; group 3: 41.1 ± 12.3 mm²; P < 0.001). NSA, LCE, AI and FEI all showed a significant difference between group 3 and 1 or 2. The ARI showed no difference between groups. Stepwise linear regression analyses showed a significant correlation between LCE angle and labral CSA with a corrected R²-value of 0.301. Labral CSA correlates with the LCE. No statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2 concerning the LCE, AI or FEI could be identified. Nevertheless, group 1 had the highest mean coverage of all groups, hips with hypertrophic labra the lowest.

Joint kinematics and kinetics during walking and running in 32 patients with hip dysplasia 1 year after periacetabular osteotomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Hip dysplasia can be treated with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). We compared joint angles and joint moments during walking and running in young adults with hip dysplasia prior to and 6 and 12 months after PAO with those in healthy controls.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Joint kinematics and kinetics were recorded using a 3-D motion capture system. The pre- and postoperative gait characteristics quantified as the peak hip extension angle and the peak joint moment of hip flexion were compared in 23 patients with hip dysplasia (18-53 years old). Similarly, the gait patterns of the patients were compared with those of 32 controls (18-54 years old).

RESULTS

During walking, the peak hip extension angle and the peak hip flexion moment were significantly smaller at baseline in the patients than in the healthy controls. The peak hip flexion moment increased 6 and 12 months after PAO relative to baseline during walking, and 6 months after PAO relative to baseline during running. For running, the improvement did not reach statistical significance at 12 months. In addition, the peak hip extension angle during walking increased 12 months after PAO, though not statistically significantly. There were no statistically significant differences in peak hip extension angle and peak hip flexion moment between the patients and the healthy controls after 12 months.

INTERPRETATION

Walking and running characteristics improved after PAO in patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia, although gait modifications were still present 12 months postoperatively.

Gender and racial differences in focal and global acetabular version

The purpose of this study was to compare the acetabular version between male and female pelvises. We hypothesized that female acetabula would demonstrate more retroversion because Pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is associated with acetabular retroversion, which is more commonly observed in females. 120 bony pelvic specimens were randomly collected. The version was measured at three different axial sections of each acetabulum: cranial, central, and caudal. Males demonstrated significantly less anteversion than females in every section. The global version (the average of all three measurements) was also significantly different between males and females (16° ± 7° and 19° ± 8° respectively, P<0.001). Of the 240 examined acetabuli, 21 demonstrated cranial retroversion (16 males & 5 females). The data showed no significant difference (P=0.353) between global version of African Americans (18° ± 9°) and Caucasians (17° ± 7°). The results of this study suggest that symptomatic FAI in the female population likely reflects a complex interplay of femoral and acetabular dysmorphology and cannot be explained by differences in acetabular version alone.

The relevance of the radiological signs of acetabular retroversion among patients with femoroacetabular impingement

Orthopaedic surgeons have accepted various radiological signs to be representative of acetabular retroversion, which is the main characteristic of focal over-coverage in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Using a validated method for radiological analysis, we assessed the relevance of these signs to predict intra-articular lesions in 93 patients undergoing surgery for FAI. A logistic regression model to predict chondral damage showed that an acetabular retroversion index (ARI) > 20%, a derivative of the well-known cross-over sign, was an independent predictor (p = 0.036). However, ARI was less significant than the Tönnis classification (p = 0.019) and age (p = 0.031) in the same model. ARI was unable to discriminate between grades of chondral lesions, while the type of cam lesion (p = 0.004) and age (p = 0.047) were able to. Other widely recognised signs of acetabular retroversion, such as the ischial spine sign, the posterior wall sign or the cross-over sign were irrelevant according to our analysis. Regardless of its secondary predictive role, an ARI > 20% appears to be the most clinically relevant radiological sign of acetabular retroversion in symptomatic patients with FAI.

New radiographic index for evaluating acetabular version

BACKGROUND

Several qualitative radiographic signs have been described to assess acetabular retroversion. However, quantitative assessment of acetabular version would be useful for more rigorous research purposes and perhaps to diagnose and treat hip disorders.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We developed a new quantitative index for acetabular version (p/a ratio). We determined the average p/a, compared it with previous radiographic signs for acetabular retroversion, and evaluated its relationship with anatomic acetabular version.

METHODS

We calculated the p/a ratio by measuring p (distance from acetabular articular surface to posterior wall) and a (distance from acetabular articular surface to anterior wall) on plain hip AP radiographs and dividing p by a. P and a were assessed on the perpendicular bisector of the line between the teardrop and the lateral edge of the acetabulum. Using 185 hip radiographs from patients with suspected idiopathic osteonecrosis, we measured p/a and compared it with previous qualitative signs for acetabular retroversion. Using 62 hip CT images from patients with no osteoarthritis, we measured the anatomic anteversion at the height of the central femoral head and investigated its relationship with p/a.

RESULTS

The average p/a was 2.05 in 185 hips, and most patients with a p/a greater than 2.05 had a negative qualitative retroversion sign. A correlation was observed between central anteversion and p/a (r = 0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

We believe this ratio can be considered a simple quantitative parameter to assess acetabular version using plain AP radiographs.

The prevalence of acetabular anomalies associated with pistol-grip-deformity in osteoarthritic hips

BACKGROUND

Acetabular retroversion, excessive acetabular coverage and abnormal head-neck-junction with a so-called "pistol-grip-deformity" were added to the classical description of hip dysplasia to describe pathological hip morphology. The aim of the current study was the detection of pathological acetabular geometry in patients with an abnormal head-neck-junction.

HYPOTHESIS

Femoroacetabular impingement and hip dysplasia features are frequent in patients with end-stage osteoarthritis before 60 years of age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analysed our data bank retrospectively for all patients who received a Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) due to end-stage osteoarthritis before the age of 60 years. The pelvic-views and the Dunn-view of these patients were screened for an abnormal head-neck-junction by measuring the head-ratio and the alpha-angle. An orthopaedic surgeon and a radiologist did this independently. These radiographies were measured for signs of acetabular dysplasia, excessive acetabular coverage and crossing sign.

RESULTS

A consecutive series of 135 total hip arthroplasties were performed in patients aged less or equal to 60 years because of end-stage osteoarthritis. From these, 81 patients were classified as having an abnormal head-neck-junction. The mean head-ratio in these 81 patients was 1.52±0.35, the mean alpha-angle was 62.5°±9.3°. The mean CE-angle of these 81 patients was 35.8°±10.4°, the mean CA-angle was 36.7°±5.7°, the mean depth-width ratio was 49.1±10, the mean extrusion index was 19.1±9.2 and the mean CCD-angle was 131.7°±7.3°. Of these 81hips, 14 had isolated pistol-grip-deformity, while 11 hips had associated dysplasia, 38 had excessive acetabular coverage, and 14 had crossing sign. In addition, a crossing sign was identified in four of the 11 dysplastic hips and 19 of the 38 of the hips having excessive acetabular coverage. There was no statistically significant difference in regard to the age between the four groups (P=0.087). In contrast, the hips that had excessive acetabular coverage had increased CE-angle (44.6°±7.2°) and decreased extrusion index (12.6±6.5) (P<0.001), while dysplastic hips had increased roof obliquity (17.5°±4.5°) and increased extrusion index (29.6±9.1), as well as decreased CE-angle (20.7°±3.0°) (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

There is a high coincidence of radiographic findings associated with an abnormal head-neck-junction consisting in excessive acetabular coverage and retroversion as well as hip dysplasia. These results advocate for restoring of the normal anatomy at the early stage to prevent end-stage osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV retrospective historical study.

Rapidly progressive osteoarthritis after arthroscopic labral repair in patients with hip dysplasia

Recent reports of poor clinical outcomes after arthroscopic surgery in hips with marked dysplasia have emerged. Arthroscopic resection of the hypertrophic labrum in cases of dysplasia, especially in the absence of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), has been implicated. Some patients will refuse PAO because it is a major open procedure, opting for a less invasive arthroscopic procedure. We present the cases of 2 young adults with marked dysplasia who had rapidly progressive osteoarthrosis despite arthroscopic labral repair. Though perhaps beneficial as an isolated procedure in borderline or mild dysplasia cases, arthroscopic hip surgery, even labral repair, may best be performed with PAO in cases with more severe dysplasia. Albeit attractive as a less invasive labral-preserving surgery, arthroscopic labral repair not only may fail to provide symptomatic improvement but may compromise or preclude a later PAO if rapidly progressive osteoarthrosis ensues. Hip arthroscopy may best be performed concurrently with or after PAO but not proceeding PAO in patients requiring both procedures.

Standardized AP radiographs do not provide reliable diagnostic measures for the assessment of acetabular retroversion

Diagnosis of acetabular retroversion is essential in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), but its assessment from radiographs is complicated by pelvic tilt and the two-dimensional nature of plain films. We performed a study to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the cross-over sign (COS) and the posterior wall sign (PWS) in identifying acetabular retroversion. COS and PWS were evaluated from radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans as the standard of reference in 50 hips of subjects with symptoms of FAI. A CT-based method using three-dimensional (3D) models was developed to measure the COS, PWS, true acetabular version, and pelvic tilt relative to the anterior pelvic plane. The new CT-based method aimed to eliminate errors resulting from variations in the position and orientation of the pelvis during imaging. A low level of agreement for COS and PWS was found between radiographs and CT scans. A positive COS strongly correlated with pelvic tilt. These results suggest that COS and PWS determined from anteroposterior radiographs are considerably limited by pelvic tilt and inherent limitations of radiographs. Their use as the sole basis for deciding whether or not surgical intervention is indicated seems questionable.

Is a hip distractor useful in the arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement?

INTRODUCTION

There is increasing interest in using hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). However, the distraction is typically done with a traction table, which can lead to complications. Our working hypothesis was that a hip-specific distractor could be used to perform arthroscopic treatment of FAI without the complications associated with traction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients were included in this prospective study with an average follow-up of 21 months (range 12-28 months). The average age was 34 ± 4 years. The technical feasibility, complications, quality of the distraction and early clinical results were evaluated.

RESULTS

None of the arthroscopy procedures had to be converted to an arthrotomy. In all cases, the procedures planned for the central and peripheral compartments were fully executed. One patient (4%) had a grade 1 cartilage iatrogenic injury of the femoral head. The distraction was determined to be effective in all the patients, with an average of 15 mm of distraction achieved (range 12-21 mm). The average Merle d'Aubigne score went from 11 (range 9-18) preoperatively to 16 (range 14-18) postoperatively; the average Harris score went from 76 (range 46-80) to 91 (range 87-100); the average Christensen score went from 64 (range 48-88) to 84 (range 72-100); the average Womac score went from 58 (range 42-96) to 84 (range 74-100). No neurological, infectious or bone complications were recorded.

DISCUSSION

The use of a distractor during hip arthroscopy appears to be a reliable and reproducible technique that allows FAI to be treated. Early results are consistent with those reported in the literature, and the risks associated with the use of a traction table are reduced. This technique makes hip arthroscopy safer and contributes to advances in labrum and cartilage repair, without additional complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III prospective study.

Descriptive epidemiology of mechanical hip pathology in adults under 50 years of age. Prospective series of 292 cases: Clinical and radiological aspects and physiopathological review

Two hundred and ninety-two patients, aged between 16 and 50 years and presenting with mechanical hip pathology, were included in a prospective multicenter study. The descriptive study concerned the clinical examination and analysis of three X-ray views (AP pelvic, Lequesne false profile and lateral axial view). The series comprised 62% males, mean age 35 years, with 53% right side and 22% bilateral involvement. Initial trauma was reported in 19% of cases, and direct familial history of hip pathology in 20%. Seventy percent of the patients played sports, 30% were high-level athletes, and 17% played combat sports. The physical impingement sign was present in 18% to 65% of cases depending on the variant studied. On imaging (n=241), 62% of hips showed osteoarthritis, with 25% at the evolved stage. In the series, as a whole, there was a 35% rate of dysplasia, 63% of impingement and 5% of normal X-ray results. The radiologic impingement aspects were 58% cam-type, 19% pincer-type and 23% mixed. Twenty-two percent of dysplasia cases showed signs of associated impingement. Pain experienced exclusively in flexion/internal rotation/adduction on examination showed little sensitivity (20%) but considerable specificity (86%) for the main diagnosis of impingement. The links between impingement and dysplasia are discussed, and an integrative schema of all risk factors is put forward.