Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Reference data for the trunk and application in patients with chronic postherpetic neuralgia

Somatosensory profiling to differentiate distinct painful diseases of the pancreas-a quantitative sensory testing case-control study

ABSTRACT

Mechanisms of pancreatic pain are insufficiently understood, and quantitative sensory testing (QST) may help to identify the underlying mechanisms. Accordingly, this study assessed comprehensive somatosensory profiles encompassing nociceptive and nonnociceptive parameters in 70 patients with distinct pancreatic diseases, namely acute (n = 23), chronic (n = 20), or autoimmune pancreatitis (n = 10) and pancreatic cancer (n = 17) and compared it with 30 healthy control subjects by standardized QST (protocol of the German research network on neuropathic pain). Patients with pancreatic diseases presented significant somatosensory deficits in all thermal and tactile detection and pain thresholds in the pancreatic viscerotome (Th10), when compared with a remote control area (dermatome C5) or reference data of matched healthy controls (P < 0.05-P < 0.0001). Unaltered vibration detection emphasizes the strictly regional character of losses. Loss of sensitivity paralleled the occurrence of paradoxical heat sensation (Th10 vs C5; P < 0.05), an indicator of thermal integration deficit. Punctate hyperalgesia or pain to light touch, the hallmark signs of spinal central sensitization were mostly absent and pain summation remained unchanged (P > 0.05). Stratification of patients revealed that somatosensory deficits were significantly more pronounced in acute compared with chronic pancreatitis (eg, cold and warm detection thresholds: -2.19 ± 1.42 vs -1.10 ± 1.23 and -1.30 ± 1.68 vs -0.11 ± 1.80 z-values; P < 0.05 each). Notably, blunt pressure hyperalgesia, the only somatosensory parameter exhibiting significant gain compared with the patients' remote C5 segment, was a frequent finding only in acute, but not in chronic pancreatitis. The somatosensory phenotype of patients with distinct pancreatic disorders was characterized by a wide array of sensory losses being most severe in acute pancreatitis.

Signs of hyperpathia in chronic peripheral neuropathic pain

BACKGROUND

Neuropathic pain is pain due to a disease or lesion of the somatosensory system, and can be either spontaneous, evoked or both. Hyperpathia is a type of evoked pain defined by IASP as 'a painful syndrome characterized by an abnormally painful reaction to a stimulus, especially a repetitive stimulus, as well as an increased threshold'. The literature is sparse, and definitions are unclear and inconsistent.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to examine for the presence of mechanical hyperpathia in a heterogeneous group of patients with peripheral neuropathic pain and correlate signs of hyperpathia with other sensory signs. Patients were examined with graded pinprick stimuli to obtain a stimulus-response curve and repetitive pinprick stimuli to assess increase in pain over time and aftersensations. Then, patients were grouped based on the likelihood of having mechanical hyperpathia with either a steep stimulus-response curve or a steep curve on the repetitive pinprick test and results were correlated to mechanical detection and pain thresholds and other outcomes from a full quantitative sensory testing.

RESULTS

We included 124 patients with documented peripheral neuropathic pain. Patients with a steep stimulus-response curve did not overlap with patients with a steep curve on the repetitive pinprick test and both groups more often had decreased rather than increased detection and pain thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study questions the concept of hyperpathia and suggests that more studies are needed to identify which symptoms and signs group together and might form a syndrome.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Hyperpathia is a syndrome of evoked pain. It is poorly defined and little is known about its clinical presentation. Since it is part of pain symptomatology it is important to have a clear definition and understand the pathophysiology behind. This study explored signs of hyperpathia in a heterogeneous group of patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. We used stimulus-response function and repetitive pinprick stimulation to group patients based on the IASP definition. More studies are needed to understand how symptoms and signs coincide.

Chronic postsurgical inguinal pain: incidence and diagnostic biomarkers from a large German national claims database

BACKGROUND

Chronic postsurgical inguinal pain (CPIP) is the most common complication of groin hernia surgery. The characteristics of patients, their medical care, and choice of diagnostic tools remain to be defined to optimise preventive and therapeutic interventions.

METHODS

Claims data from 2018 and a 1-yr follow-up were analysed for incidence and medical care. A separate cohort (141 healthy controls and 17 CPIP patients) was examined by deep phenotyping. This included sensory testing, blood and skin biopsies, MRI of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG), and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 11,221 patients with hernia surgery in 2018 identified, 8.5% had pain before that was relieved by surgery, but a similar percentage had novel pain in this region. Deep phenotyping of 141 healthy controls provided a map of the inguinal sensory system. The following analysis of patients with CPIP revealed that they suffered from moderate pain with neuropathic features, individual sensory abnormalities, and unilateral L1 DRG atrophy. In the blood, levels of C-C-motif chemokine ligand (CCL2) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were upregulated, whereas apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) concentration was reduced. A cluster of DRG atrophy, BDNF, ApoA1, and anxiety correlated best with the diagnosis. CPIP patients with novel pain had significantly more DRG atrophy (-24% ipsilateral vs contralateral volume).

CONCLUSIONS

CPIP is often newly acquired after surgery. A combination of DRG imaging, serum markers, and anxiety screening can support the diagnosis. In the future, this could guide clinicians towards more personalised therapies (e.g. targeting anxiety or lipid profiles) and possible altered surgical techniques.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Trial Registry DRKS00024588 and DRKS00016790.

Gender differences in clinical presentations and sensory profiles in patients with fibromyalgia: implications of peripheral and central mechanisms

Introduction

Fibromyalgia has a high female predominance and research work has been focussing mainly on women.

Objectives

We aimed to answer (1) gender differences in pain scores and quality of life, (2) any gender-specific subgroups defined by quantitative sensory testing (QST), and (3) correlations of QST parameters with pain intensity and questionnaire scores.

Methods

We evaluated clinical presentations and QST profiles from 38 male and 38 age-matched female patients.

Results

Women reported significantly higher scores in average daily pain, daily sleep interference score, average weekly pain, weekly sleep interference score, and revised fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (rFIQ). Based on LOGA classification, L0G2, mechanical allodynia or hyperalgesia without abnormal sensory loss, was the most common QST subtype which accounted for 28.9% of men and 26.3% of women. Approximately 34.2% of men and 26.3% of women displayed loss of function of small fibres with an increased cold or warm detection threshold. Cold detection threshold was negatively correlated with pain intensity and functional impairment, suggesting a peripheral mechanism. Central sensitization, defined as allodynia and hyperalgesia to thermal or mechanical stimuli, was found in two-thirds of male and female patients. Mechanical pain sensitivity was positively correlated with the severity of pain and associated symptoms in women, but not men.

Conclusion

There was a marked gender difference in reported pain and quality of life. We have confirmed that central sensitization is a major mechanism for women. Our data suggested an important role of small fibre pathology in both men and women.

Do female and male chests feel the same? A comprehensive quantitative sensory analysis

INTRODUCTION

There is growing interest in understanding chest sensory function due to the significant morbidity associated with impaired sensation following nerve injury. While the baseline quantitative sensory and pain thresholds in female and male patients have been studied in various other anatomic areas, there is little knowledge on quantitative sensation at the chest as well as the presence of possible gender differences. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a comprehensive quantitative sensory analysis to determine if female and male chests feel the same.

METHODS

A total of 100 chests in 50 subjects (25 females and 25 males) were evaluated. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) was performed on the nipple areola complex (NAC) and surrounding chest skin and included mechanical detection using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, two-point discrimination, vibration detection, pin prick, cold detection, warm detection, heat pain and pressure pain thresholds.

RESULTS

Male chests were significantly more sensitive to mechanical detection, two-point discrimination, vibration, pin prick as well as cold and warm detection at both the NAC and chest as compared to female chests (p<0.05). Females had significantly lower sensory thresholds to heat pain and pressure pain detection at both the NAC and chest as compared to males (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The quantitative sensory functions of female and male chests are significantly different. This knowledge helps to better understand baseline sensory functions at the chest and the awareness of gender differences in this anatomic area.

Explorative sensory profile evaluation in central neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND

Sensory profiling in neuropathic pain using quantitative sensory testing (QST) has not been extended to central neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury (SCI). This study aims to fill this gap by evaluating sensory profiles in patients with neuropathic SCI pain.

METHOD

We retrospectively analysed consecutive QST data from 62 patients with neuropathic spinal cord injury pain (SCIP), following the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain protocol. The study included at-level and below-level SCIP due to a spinal cord lesion, and at-level SCIP following a cauda equina lesion. QST parameters were compared between diagnostic groups. QST profiles of below-level SCIP (central neuropathic pain) were manually assigned to sensory phenotypes based on literature and expert opinion.

RESULTS

No statistical difference in QST parameters between pain diagnoses was found. For central neuropathic pain (below-level SCIP), three phenotypes were descriptively observed: loss of function (59%), thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia combination (16%), and mechanical hyperalgesia (19%). The remaining 5% of patients did not fit a common pattern. There was no statistical difference in clinical and psychological variables between phenotypes. In a subgroup analysis, the loss of function phenotype weakly correlated with older age, longer time since injury, and longer pain duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we capture sensory phenotypes of central neuropathic pain following SCI. The limited sample size, high rate of missing values, and the retrospective nature of the study mean that results should be seen as strictly exploratory. Further research should replicate these findings and explore the significance of phenotypes.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

The evaluation of sensory phenotypes by quantitative sensory testing in central neuropathic pain due to SCI adds a new perspective on sensory phenotypes in comparison to peripheral neuropathic pain. The described thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia combination might represent involvement of the spinothalamic tract. In addition, there was a trend towards older age and longer time since injury in patients with loss of function.

Application of the grading system for "nociplastic pain" in chronic primary and chronic secondary pain conditions: a field study

ABSTRACT

The concept "nociplastic pain" has been developed for patients with features of nociceptive system sensitization that are not explained as nociceptive or neuropathic. Here, we tested how well the recently published grading system differentiates between chronic primary and secondary pain conditions. We recruited patients with fibromyalgia (FMS, n = 41), complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS, n = 11), osteoarthritis (OA, n = 21), or peripheral nerve injury (PNI, n = 8). We used clinical history, pain drawings, quantitative sensory testing (QST), and questionnaires to classify their pains as possibly or probably "nociplastic." All patients with chronic primary pain exhibited widespread/regional pain not explainable by either nociceptive or neuropathic mechanisms. Widespread pain occurred in 12 patients with OA but was identified as nociceptive in 11 of 12. Regional pain occurred in 4 patients with PNI but was identified as neuropathic in 3 of 4. At this step, the grading system had 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Clinical evidence for pain hypersensitivity by QST, and history of hypersensitivity and mental comorbidities did not differentiate between chronic primary pain (QST: 36/52 = 69%, history: 43/52 = 83%) and secondary pain conditions (QST: 20/29 = 69%, history: 24/29 83%). Based on these data, specificity remained excellent (93%), but sensitivity dropped substantially (60%) due to lacking evidence for pain hypersensitivity in many patients with FMS. This low sensitivity suggests that the published grading system is not suitable for screening purposes. We suggest structural and content modifications to improve sensitivity, including placement of patient history before clinical examination and addition of a high tender point count as evidence for widespread pain hypersensitivity.

What is associated with painful polyneuropathy? A cross-sectional analysis of symptoms and signs in patients with painful and painless polyneuropathy

ABSTRACT

It is still unclear how and why some patients develop painful and others painless polyneuropathy. The aim of this study was to identify multiple factors associated with painful polyneuropathies (NeuP). A total of 1181 patients of the multicenter DOLORISK database with painful (probable or definite NeuP) or painless (unlikely NeuP) probable or confirmed neuropathy were investigated clinically, with questionnaires and quantitative sensory testing. Multivariate logistic regression including all variables (demographics, medical history, psychological symptoms, personality items, pain-related worrying, life-style factors, as well as results from clinical examination and quantitative sensory testing) and machine learning was used for the identification of predictors and final risk prediction of painful neuropathy. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that severity and idiopathic etiology of neuropathy, presence of chronic pain in family, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue and Depression T-Score, as well as Pain Catastrophizing Scale total score are the most important features associated with the presence of pain in neuropathy. Machine learning (random forest) identified the same variables. Multivariate logistic regression archived an accuracy above 78%, random forest of 76%; thus, almost 4 out of 5 subjects can be classified correctly. This multicenter analysis shows that pain-related worrying, emotional well-being, and clinical phenotype are factors associated with painful (vs painless) neuropathy. Results may help in the future to identify patients at risk of developing painful neuropathy and identify consequences of pain in longitudinal studies.

Test-retest and inter-rater reliability of two devices measuring tactile mechanical detection thresholds in healthy adults: Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and the cutaneous mechanical stimulator

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Limitations exist in evaluating mechanical detection thresholds (MDTs) due to a lack of dependable electronic instruments designed to assess Aβ fibers and measure MDTs across different body areas. This study aims to evaluate the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the cutaneous mechanical stimulator (CMS), an electronic tactile stimulator, in quantifying MDTs.

METHODS

Using a test-retest design, participants underwent assessments of MDTs using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments (SWM) and the CMS. This study included 27 healthy volunteers (mean age 24.07 ± 3.76 years). Two raters assessed MDTs using SWM and the CMS at two stimulation sites (the left hand and foot) in two experimental sessions approximately 2 weeks apart.

RESULTS

MDTs using SWM and the CMS showed excellent reliability on the hand (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = .84) and foot (ICC = .90). A comparison of results obtained at the two sessions showed that MDTs on the hand displayed good reliability for both SWM (ICC = .63) and the CMS (ICC = .73), whereas MDTs on the foot displayed fair reliability for SWM (ICC = .50) and the CMS (ICC = .42). MDTs exhibited good inter-rater reliability with SWM (ICC = .66) and excellent inter-rater reliability with the CMS (ICC = .82) on the hand, as well as showing fair inter-rater reliability with SWM (ICC = .53) and good inter-rater reliability with the CMS (ICC = .60) on the foot.

DISCUSSION

The CMS showed superior inter-rater reliability, indicating its potential as a valuable tool for assessing tactile sensitivity in research and clinical settings.

Quantitative Sensory Testing - From bench to bedside

The methodology of Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) comprises standardized testing procedures, which provide information of the integrity of the somatosensory nervous system. Over the years, different protocols have been established, which utilize similar but distinct testing procedures. They pursue the same overall objective to identify loss or gain of function of the respective sensory parameter to better understand the degree of abnormal nervous function and thereby improve patient care in the long-term. Laboratory-based QST protocols, which apply highly standardized testing procedures in pre-defined order and body regions, are considered as the gold standard in sensory testing. However, those protocols often require specifically trained personal, high equipment investment, and are time consuming. Thus, in recent years several attempts have been made to simplify testing protocols as well as reduce high costs of testing equipment such as thermal probe systems. These attempts have culminated in an array of sensory bedside testing protocols subserving the need for protocols that are easy to implement in and provide a standardized assessment within clinical trials. While laboratory and bedside QST that focus on static responses of single stimuli, protocols for testing dynamic QST focus on the functional response to pain also exist. Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is often applied, which offers the ability to study endogenous inhibition of pain. All of these mentioned methodologies are considered as psychophysical measures and thus rely heavily on the cooperation of the patient or participant. In this chapter we provide an overview of QST along three main lines: (i) laboratory QST, (ii) bedside QST and (iii) dynamic QST. In addition, we discuss advantages and pitfalls of each modality. While we discuss along these lines, it should be noted that methodologies are overlapping: some bedside tests are similar or identical to lab-QST, many lab-QST protocols include a dynamic component, and assessment of dynamic QST requires to start with static assessments.

Pressure and cold pain threshold reference values in a pain-free older adult population

Background

More sex-specific pain sensitivity normative values from population-based cohorts in pain-free older adults are required. The aims of this study were (1) to provide sex- and age-specific normative values of pressure and cold pain thresholds in older pain-free adults and (2) to examine the association of potential correlates of pain sensitivity with pain threshold values.

Methods

This study investigated sex-specific pressure (lumbar spine, tibialis anterior, neck and dorsal wrist) and cold (dorsal wrist) pain threshold estimates for older pain-free adults aged 41-70 years. This cross-sectional study used participants (n = 212) from the Raine Study Gen1-26 year follow-up. The association of pain thresholds, with correlates including sex, test site, ethnicity, waist-hip ratio, smoking status, health-related quality of life, depression, anxiety and stress symptoms, sleep quality, socioeconomic status and physical activity levels, was examined.

Results

Values for pressure and cold pain thresholds for older pain-free adults are provided, grouped by vicennium, sex and test site (pressure). Statistically significant independent correlates of increased pressure pain sensitivity were test site, ethnicity and sex. Only lower waist/hip ratio was a statistically significant, independent correlate of increased cold pain sensitivity.

Conclusions

This study provides robust sex- and age-specific normative values for pressure pain threshold and cold pain threshold for an older adult pain-free population. Combined with existing values, these data provide an important resource in assisting interpretation of pain sensitivity in clinical pain disorders and provide insights into the complex association of pain sensitivity with correlates that can be used in research.

Identifying and Evaluating Biological Markers of Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Comprehensive Review

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) manifests as persistent chronic pain that emerges after a herpes zoster outbreak and greatly diminishes quality of life. Unfortunately, its treatment efficacy has remained elusive, with many therapeutic efforts yielding less than satisfactory results. The research to discern risk factors predicting the onset, trajectory, and prognosis of PHN has been extensive. However, these risk factors often present as nonspecific and diverse, indicating the need for more reliable, measurable, and objective detection methods. The exploration of potential biological markers, including hematological indices, pathological insights, and supportive tests, is increasing. This review highlights potential biomarkers that are instrumental for the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of PHN while also delving deeper into its genesis. Drawing from prior research, aspects such as immune responsiveness, neuronal injury, genetic makeup, cellular metabolism, and pain signal modulation have emerged as prospective biomarkers. The immune spectrum spans various cell subtypes, with an emphasis on T cells, interferons, interleukins, and other related cytokines. Studies on nerve injury are directed toward pain-related proteins and the density and health of epidermal nerve fibers. On the genetic and metabolic fronts, the focus lies in the detection of predisposition genes, atypical protein manifestations, and energy-processing dynamics, with a keen interest in vitamin metabolism. Tools such as functional magnetic resonance imaging, electromyography, and infrared imaging have come to the forefront in the pain signaling domain. This review compiles the evidence, potential clinical implications, and challenges associated with these promising biomarkers, paving the way for innovative strategies for predicting, diagnosing, and addressing PHN.

Differences in Somatosensory Function Related to Hand Dominance: Results of a Quantitative Sensory Testing Study in Healthy Volunteers

Purpose

Quantitative sensory testing commonly utilizes the unaffected, contralateral side as a control to detect somatosensory dysfunction. There is scant evidence that somatosensory function for the volar dominant and non-dominant hands is equivalent, therefore intra-patient comparisons are unwarranted. This study aimed to identify dominance-related differences in palmar hand somatosensation, thereby determining if the unaffected contralateral hand is a valid comparator in clinical populations.

Participants and Methods

With ethical approval (IREC_13_1_10) and informed consent, 110 healthy adult volunteers' participated in this clinical measurement study. Somatosensory function was assessed with the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) quantitative sensory testing (QST) protocol. Half of the participants were tested on the dominant hand. Thirteen parameters of thermal and mechanical detection and pain threshold were evaluated at both the dorsal and volar hand (distal middle finger). Tests were performed in the same order and instructions were read from a standardized script. Results for dorsal hand tests were compared to DFNS normative data to confirm participants met study inclusion criteria. Between-group differences for age and sex were investigated with the independent samples t-test and Chi-square test of independence, respectively. Group differences for dominant and non-dominant hands for all 13 continuous QST parameters were investigated with the Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results

Data for 106 participants were included in statistical analysis. Fifty percent of participants were tested on the dominant hand [n=53]; there were no differences for age or sex between groups (dominant or non-dominant hand test group). The dominant volar hand was significantly more sensitive to vibration detection threshold than the non-dominant hand (P=0.001). There were no significant differences related to dominance for other DFNS QST measures.

Conclusion

For quantitative sensory testing with the DFNS protocol in healthy cohorts, the contralateral, unaffected hand is a valid control, with the exception of vibration detection threshold.

Reduction of Chronic Primary Low Back Pain by Spinal Manipulative Therapy is Accompanied by Decreases in Segmental Mechanical Hyperalgesia and Pain Catastrophizing: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Dual-blind Mixed Experimental Trial

Chronic primary low back pain (CPLBP) refers to low back pain that persists over 3 months, that cannot be explained by another chronic condition, and that is associated with emotional distress and disability. Previous studies have shown that spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is effective in relieving CPLBP, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. This randomized placebo-controlled dual-blind mixed experimental trial (NCT05162924) aimed to investigate the efficacy of SMT to improve CPLBP and its underlying mechanisms. Ninety-eight individuals with CPLBP and 49 controls were recruited. Individuals with CPLBP received SMT (n = 49) or a control intervention (n = 49), 12 times over 4 weeks. The primary outcomes were CPLBP intensity (0-100 on a numerical rating scale) and disability (Oswestry Disability Index). Secondary outcomes included pressure pain thresholds in 4 body regions, pain catastrophizing, Central Sensitization Inventory, depressive symptoms, and anxiety scores. Individuals with CPLBP showed widespread mechanical hyperalgesia (P < .001) and higher scores for all questionnaires (P < .001). SMT reduced pain intensity compared with the control intervention (mean difference: -11.7 [95% confidence interval, -11.0 to -12.5], P = .01), but not disability (P = .5). Similar mild to moderate adverse events were reported in both groups. Mechanical hyperalgesia at the manipulated segment was reduced after SMT compared with the control intervention (P < .05). Pain catastrophizing was reduced after SMT compared with the control intervention (P < .05), but this effect was not significant after accounting for changes in clinical pain. Although the reduction of segmental mechanical hyperalgesia likely contributes to the clinical benefits of SMT, the role of pain catastrophizing remains to be clarified. PERSPECTIVE: This randomized controlled trial found that 12 sessions of SMT yield greater relief of CPLBP than a control intervention. These clinical effects were independent of expectations, and accompanied by an attenuation of hyperalgesia in the targeted segment and a modulation of pain catastrophizing.

Quantitative sensory testing in notalgia paresthetica reveals small fiber-type-specific differences in non-pruritic sensitivity: a pilot study

Introduction

Notalgia paresthetica (NP) is a chronic condition characterized by pruritus and other unpleasant dysesthetic sensations unilaterally on the subscapular back. Its specific underlying mechanisms are largely unknown, though hypothesized to be neuropathic. Determination of possible somatosensory contributors to the condition could pave the way for novel treatments.

Objectives

Given the potential involvement of non-pruritic mechanisms in NP, our objective was to broadly characterize the somatosensory function in NP-affected and unaffected skin using methods that have been standardized in pain-free controls and painful neuropathic disorders. We hypothesized that if NP is caused by neuropathic mechanisms not targeted directly to pruritoceptors in the skin, somatosensory abnormalities would not be itchspecific. Second, given the lack of symptoms on the contralateral side of the back, we hypothesized that this region would be normally sensitive.

Methods

In this study, quantitative sensory testing (QST) was used to comprehensively assess the somatosensory function in 15 adult patients with NP. Standardized QST metrics were performed in the NP-affected region and compared with the contralateral asymptomatic skin and itch-free individuals using an age, gender, and site-matched reference data set.

Results

There were no significant differences in sensitivity between symptomatic and asymptomatic skin, except for increased mechanical-evoked itch on the itchy side. However, reference data set comparisons revealed bilateral hyposensitivity to innocuous cold and noxious pinprick and higher temporal summation of pain in patients with NP. In addition, compared with reference data, patients with NP demonstrated decreased sensitivity to cold and pinprick, presence of paradoxical heat sensations, and increased wind-up of pain.

Conclusion

These results suggest a role for Aδ fiber pathways and central sensitization in NP-associated itch. More research is needed to determine whether sensory differences extend beyond the NP-affected dermatomal level and what might cause neuropathy specifically targeting Aδ fibers.

Non-obese lipedema patients show a distinctly altered quantitative sensory testing profile with high diagnostic potential

Introduction and Objectives

Lipedema is a widespread severe chronic disease affecting mostly women. Characterized by painful bilateral fat accumulation in extremities sparing hands and feet, objective measurement-based diagnosis is currently missing. We tested for characteristic psychometric and/or sensory alterations including pain and for their potential for medical routine diagnosis.

Methods

Pain psychometry was assessed using the German Pain Questionnaire. Sensory sensitivity toward painful and nonpainful stimuli was characterized in non-obese lipedema patients and matched controls using the validated quantitative sensory testing (QST) protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain.

Results

Lipedema patients showed no overt psychometric abnormalities. Pain was reported as somatic rather than psychosomatic aversive. All QST measurements were normal, but the z-score of pressure pain thresholds (PPT) was twofold reduced and the z-score of vibration detection thresholds (VDT) was two and a half times increased. Both thresholds were selectively altered at the affected thigh but not the unaffected hand. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the combination of PPT and VDT of thigh vs hand into a PVTH score (PPT, VDT, thigh, hand-score) shows high sensitivity and specificity, categorizing correctly 95.8% of the participants as lipedema patients or healthy controls. Bayesian inference analysis corroborated the diagnostic potential of such a combined PVTH score.

Conclusion

We propose to assess PPT and VDT at the painful thigh and the pain-free hand. Combination in a PVTH score may allow a convenient lipedema diagnosis early during disease development.

[The EAN-NeuPSIG guideline on the diagnosis of neuropathic pain-a summary]

In this joint guideline of the scientific societies and working groups mentioned in the title, evidence-based recommendations for the use of screening questionnaires and diagnostic tests in patients with neuropathic pain were developed. The systematic literature search and meta-analysis yielded the following results: Of the screening questionnaires, Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4), I‑DN4 (self-administered DN4), and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) received a strong recommendation, while S‑LANSS (self-administered LANSS) and PainDETECT received weak recommendations for their use in the diagnostic workup of patients with possible neuropathic pain. There was a strong recommendation for the use of skin biopsy and a weak recommendation for quantitative sensory testing and nociceptive evoked potentials. The role of confocal corneal microscopy is still unclear. Functional imaging and peripheral nerve blocks are helpful in elucidating the pathophysiology, but current literature does not support their use in diagnosing neuropathic pain. In selected cases, genetic testing in specialized centers may be considered.

Association of Small Fiber Function with Microvascular Perfusion of Peripheral Nerves in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes : Study using Quantitative Sensory Testing and Magnetic Resonance Neurography

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Diabetic small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is caused by damage to thinly myelinated A‑fibers (δ) and unmyelinated C‑fibers. This study aimed to assess associations between quantitative sensory testing (QST) and parameters of peripheral nerve perfusion obtained from dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) in type 2 diabetes patients with and without SFN.

METHODS

A total of 18 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D, 8 with SFN, 10 without SFN) and 10 healthy controls (HC) took part in this cross-sectional single-center study and underwent QST of the right leg and DCE-MRN of the right thigh with subsequent calculation of the sciatic nerve constant of capillary permeability (Ktrans), extravascular extracellular volume fraction (Ve), and plasma volume fraction (Vp).

RESULTS

The Ktrans (HC 0.031 min-1 ± 0.009, T2D 0.043 min-1 ± 0.015; p = 0.033) and Ve (HC 1.2% ± 1.5, T2D: 4.1% ± 5.1; p = 0.027) were lower in T2D patients compared to controls. In T2D patients, compound z‑scores of thermal and mechanical detection correlated with Ktrans (r = 0.73; p = 0.001, and r = 0.57; p = 0.018, respectively) and Ve (r = 0.67; p = 0.002, and r = 0.69; p = 0.003, respectively). Compound z‑scores of thermal pain and Vp (r = -0.57; p = 0.015) correlated negatively.

DISCUSSION

The findings suggest that parameters of peripheral nerve microcirculation are related to different symptoms in SFN: A reduced capillary permeability may result in a loss of function related to insufficient nutritional supply, whereas increased capillary permeability may be accompanied by painful symptoms related to a gain of function.

The effect of lacosamide in peripheral neuropathic pain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phenotype-stratified trial

BACKGROUND

Neuropathic pain is common and difficult to treat. The sodium channel blocker lacosamide is efficacious in animal models of pain, but its effect on neuropathic pain in humans is inconclusive.

METHODS

In a multicentre, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled phenotype stratified trial, we examined if lacosamide produced better pain relief in patients with the irritable nociceptor phenotype compared to those without. The primary outcome was the change in daily average pain from baseline to last week of 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary and tertiary outcomes included pain relief, patient global impression of change and presence of 30% and 50% pain reduction.

RESULTS

The study was prematurely closed with 93 patients included and 63 randomized to lacosamide or placebo in a 2:1 ratio, of which 49 fulfilled the per protocol criteria and was used for the primary objective. We did not find a better effect of lacosamide in patients with the irritable nociceptor phenotype, the 95% CI for the primary objective was 0.41 (-1.2 to 2.0). For all patients randomized, lacosamide had no effect on the primary outcome, but significantly more patients were responders to lacosamide than during placebo, with an NNT of 4.0 (95% CI 2.3-16.1) and 5.0 (95% CI 2.8-24.5) for 30% and 50% pain reduction respectively. We did not identify any predictors for response. Lacosamide was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

We could not confirm that lacosamide was more efficacious in patients with the irritable nociceptor type, but the study was prematurely closed, so we cannot exclude a small difference.

SIGNIFICANCE

Treatment of neuropathic pain is often a trial and error process. Little is known about which patient benefit from which kind of medication. The sodium channel blocker lacosamide shows variable effect on neuropathic pain. Pain sensory phenotype, as defined by quantitative sensory testing, did not predict response to treatment with lacosamide.

Paradoxical heat sensation as a manifestation of thermal hypesthesia: a study of 1090 patients with lesions of the somatosensory system

ABSTRACT

Paradoxical heat sensation (PHS) is the perception of warmth when the skin is cooled. Paradoxical heat sensation rarely occurs in healthy individuals but more frequently in patients suffering from lesions or disease of the peripheral or central nervous system. To further understand mechanisms and epidemiology of PHS, we evaluated the occurrence of PHS in relation to disease aetiology, pain levels, quantitative sensory testing parameters, and Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) items in patients with nervous system lesions. Data of 1090 patients, including NPSI scores from 404 patients, were included in the analysis. We tested 11 quantitative sensory testing parameters for thermal and mechanical detection and pain thresholds, and 10 NPSI items in a multivariate generalised linear model with PHS, aetiology, and pain (yes or no) as fixed effects. In total, 30% of the neuropathic patients reported PHS in contrast to 2% of healthy individuals. The frequency of PHS was not linked to the presence or intensity of pain. Paradoxical heat sensation was more frequent in patients living with polyneuropathy compared with central or unilateral peripheral nerve lesions. Patients who reported PHS demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity to thermal perception, with lower sensitivity to normally painful heat and cold stimuli. Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory scores were lower for burning and electric shock-like pain quality for patients with PHS. Our findings suggest that PHS is associated with loss of small thermosensory fibre function normally involved in cold and warm perception. Clinically, presence of PHS could help screening for loss of small fibre function as it is straightforward to measure or self-reported by patients.

Botulinum Toxin A in the treatment of frostbite sequelae - results from a blinded, early-phase, comparative trial

INTRODUCTION

Freezing Cold Injuries (FCI) have been associated with long-term sequelae including vasospasm. The aims of the pilot study are to explore the research methodology and investigate the tolerability and safety of treatment with Botulinum Toxin-A (BTX-A) in FCI Sequelae.

METHODOLOGY

This pilot study tests the logistics, the treatment setting and the follow-up procedure in an early-phase, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial study-design. The variables in the study were subjective symptoms, peripheral micro-vascularization/rewarming, somatosensory responsiveness, and generic measure of health status.

RESULTS

No major challenges or difficulties were noticed according to the protocol or the study methodology. The monitoring of tolerability and safety of treatment with BTX-A did not reveal any major unwanted and/or adverse reactions among the patients in the pilot study and no challenges occurred during data collection of endpoints. The study revealed an inaccuracy of the 2nd degree FCI diagnosis and uncover a need for relevant and sufficient clinical information for FCI classification.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study showed the study methodology with minor adjustments is feasible in a future full-scale clinical trial. The recruitment process needs to be more refined to ensure that the eligible study participants are a homogenous group of FCI patients.

Neural correlates of central pain sensitization in chronic low back pain: a resting-state fMRI study

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to explore the neural correlates of pain sensitization in patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP). While the association between cLBP and pain sensitization has been widely reported, the underlying brain mechanism responsible for this relationship requires further investigation.

METHODS

Our study included 56 cLBP patients and 56 healthy controls (HC). Functional magnetic resonance imaging data were obtained, and the voxel-wise amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) was calculated to identify brain alterations in cLBP patients compared to HC groups. Pearson correlation coefficients were computed to explore the association between clinical data and brain alterations. Furthermore, mediation analyses were performed to investigate the path association between brain alterations and pain-related behaviors.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed that patients with cLBP exhibited higher sensitivity, attention, and catastrophizing tendencies towards pain compared to HC. Furthermore, cLBP patients displayed significantly higher ALFF in various brain regions within the "pain matrix" and the default mode network when compared to HC. The altered precuneus ALFF was positively correlated with pain intensity (R = 0.51, P<0.001) and was negatively correlated with pain sensitivity (R = -0.43, P<0.001) in cLBP patients. Importantly, the effect of altered precuneus ALFF on pain intensity was mediated by pain threshold in these patients.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that altered neural activity in the precuneus may contribute to pain hypersensitivity, which further exacerbating pain in cLBP patients.

Age-, gender- and body site-specific reference values of thermal Quantitative Sensory Testing in the Italian population using the Q-sense device

BACKGROUND

Age-, gender- and body site-specific values of thermal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) measures have not yet been reported using the novel and cheap device 'Q-sense'. Here, we aimed to assess normative values of Q-sense-derived parameters in a representative Italian population.

METHODS

QST parameters were measured in 84 healthy participants (42 males; aged 20-76 years) equally distributed into three age groups (18-39, 40-59 and 60-80 years). We explored the Warm and the Cold Detection Thresholds (WDT and CDT, respectively) with the method of limits (MLI) and the method of levels (MLE), and the Heat Pain Threshold (HPT) with the MLI. We tested the trigeminal supraorbital region, the hand thenar, and the foot dorsum on the right body side.

RESULTS

We calculated non-parametric reference limits (2.5-97.5th) according to age, gender and tested site. All QST measures were affected by age, gender and tested site. In the extra-trigeminal body sites, females showed lower WDT and higher CDT, while males had higher HPT. Worse sensory discriminative abilities and increased HPT values were found in people aged over 40 on the foot. Age-related differences were more evident with the reaction time-dependent MLI vs. MLE paradigm.

CONCLUSIONS

Demographic characteristics must be considered when QST is used in the clinical setting. The definition of reference limits for sensory testing with the Q-sense herein provided can pave the way towards a more widespread use of thermal QST for diagnosing small fiber neuropathy and for identifying patients' profiles in different chronic pain syndromes.

Comprehensive quantitative sensory testing shows altered sensory function in women with chronic pelvic pain: results from the Translational Research in Pelvic Pain (TRiPP) Study

ABSTRACT

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP), despite its high prevalence, is still relatively poorly understood mechanistically. This study, as part of the Translational Research in Pelvic Pain (TRiPP) project, has used a full quantitative sensory testing (QST) paradigm to profile n = 85 women with and without CPP (endometriosis or bladder pain specifically). We used the foot as a control site and abdomen as the test site. Across 5 diagnostically determined subgroups, we found features which are common across different aetiologies, eg, gain of function in pressure pain threshold (PPT) when assessing responses from the lower abdomen or pelvis (referred pain site). However, disease-specific phenotypes were also identified, eg, greater mechanical allodynia in endometriosis, despite there being large heterogeneities within diagnostic groups. The most common QST sensory phenotype was mechanical hyperalgesia (>50% across all the groups). A "healthy' sensory phenotype was seen in <7% of CPP participants. Specific QST measures correlated with sensory symptoms assessed by the painDETECT questionnaire (pressure-evoked pain [painDETECT] and PPT [QST] [ r = 0.47, P < 0.001]; mechanical hyperalgesia (painDETECT) and mechanical pain sensitivity [MPS from QST] [ r = 0.38, P = 0.009]). The data suggest that participants with CPP are sensitive to both deep tissue and cutaneous inputs, suggesting that central mechanisms may be important in this cohort. We also see phenotypes such as thermal hyperalgesia, which may be the result of peripheral mechanisms, such as irritable nociceptors. This highlights the importance of stratifying patients into clinically meaningful phenotypes, which may have implications for the development of better therapeutic strategies for CPP.

Intra- and inter-session reliability of electrical detection and pain thresholds of cutaneous and muscle primary afferents in the lower back of healthy individuals

To advance evidence-based practice and targeted treatments of low back pain (LBP), a better pathophysiological understanding and reliable outcome measures are required. The processing of nociceptive information from deeper somatic structures (e.g., muscle, fascia) might play an essential role in the pathophysiology of LBP. In this study, we measured the intra- and inter-session reliability of electrical detection and pain thresholds of cutaneous and muscle primary afferents of the lower back. Twenty healthy participants attended two study visits separated by 27.7 ± 1.7 days. To determine the location-specific electrical detection threshold (EDT) and pain threshold (EPT), needle electrodes were inserted in the epidermal layer over, and in the lumbar erector spinae muscle. Additionally, established quantitative sensory testing (QST) parameters were assessed. Reliability was determined by differences between measurements, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1), Bland-Altman plots, and standard error of measurement (SEM). Correspondence between QST parameters and electrical thresholds was assessed using Pearson's correlation. Except for cutaneous EPT, no significant (p ≤ 0.05) intra- and inter-session differences were observed. Excellent intra-session reliability was shown for cutaneous and intramuscular electrical stimulations and all QST parameters (ICC: 0.76-0.93). Inter-session reliabilities were good (ICC: 0.74-0.75) except for electrical stimulations (ICC: 0.08-0.36). Limits of agreement and SEM were higher for inter-session than intra-session. A medium to strong relationship was found between electrical and mechanical/pressure pain thresholds. In conclusion, cutaneous and intramuscular electrical stimulation will potentially close an important diagnostic gap regarding the selective examination of deep tissue afferents and provide location-specific information for the excitability of non-nociceptive and nociceptive afferents.

Quantitative Sensory Testing to Characterize Sensory Changes in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Skin Lesions

Importance

Pain is the most impactful symptom in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Characterization of sensory profiles may improve understanding of pain mechanisms in HS and facilitate identification of effective pain management strategies.

Objective

To characterize somatosensory profiles in patients with HS at clinically affected and nonaffected sites compared with pain-free reference data.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Emory University Dermatology Clinic. It was hypothesized (1) that patients with HS would demonstrate hypersensitivity to pain in HS lesions and (2) that some patients would have sensory profiles consistent with complex pain mechanisms. Therefore, adults with dermatologist-diagnosed HS and at least 1 painful HS lesion at the time of testing were enrolled between September 10, 2020, and March 21, 2022. Patients with other diagnoses contributing to pain or neuropathy were excluded. Data analysis was conducted between March and April 2022.

Exposure

Quantitative sensory testing was performed on HS lesions and control skin according to a standardized protocol.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Quantitative sensory testing outcomes included innocuous thermal and mechanical sensitivity (cold, warmth, and light touch detection thresholds), noxious thermal and mechanical sensitivity (cold, heat, pinprick, and deep pressure pain thresholds and suprathreshold pinprick sensitivity), temporal summation of pinprick, paradoxical thermal sensations, and dynamic mechanical allodynia (pain upon light stroking of the skin). Sensitivity in HS lesions was compared with sensitivity in a control location (the hand) and in pain-free controls using t tests.

Results

This study included 20 participants with a median age of 35.5 (IQR, 30.0-46.5) years, the majority of whom were women (15 [75%]). In terms of race and ethnicity, 2 participants (10%) self-identified as Asian, 11 (55%) as Black, 6 (30%) as White, and 1 (5%) as more than 1 race or ethnicity. Compared with site-specific reference values from healthy, pain-free control participants, HS lesions were insensitive to innocuous cold and warmth, noxious heat, and light touch (t = -5.69, -10.20, -3.84, and 4.46, respectively; all P < .001). In contrast, HS lesions also demonstrated significant hypersensitivity to deep pressure pain (t = 8.36; P < .001) and cutaneous pinprick (t = 2.07; P = .046). Hypersensitivity to deep pressure pain was also observed in the control site (t = 5.85; P < .001). A subset of patients with HS displayed changes in pain processing that are often seen in neuropathic and nociplastic pain conditions, including hypersensitivity to repetitive pinprick (5 [26%]), paradoxical thermal sensations (3 [15%]), and pain upon light stroking of the skin (10 [50%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that HS involves local changes in the skin or its free nerve endings, possibly leading to peripheral neuropathy and alterations in the transduction of innocuous and noxious thermal and mechanical stimuli. For some patients, central nervous system changes in somatosensory processing may also occur, but confirmatory evidence is needed. Better understanding of neuropathic and nociplastic mechanisms in HS pain could lead to individually tailored treatments.

Associations between psychological factors, pressure pain thresholds and conditioned pain modulation and disability in (sub)-acute low back pain: a three-month follow-up study

BACKGROUND

The clinical presentation and pain experience of patients with (sub)-acute low back pain ((S)ALBP) can strongly vary in clinical practice. However, despite growing evidence that psychological factors are associated with disability in chronic pain conditions including low back pain, studies examining the influence of psychological factors, quantitative sensory testing (QST) (i.e. pressure pain thresholds (PPTs)) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) on future disability are still lacking in (S)ALBP.

OBJECTIVE

This prospective cohort study aims to determine associations between baseline psychological factors, PPTs and CPM in (S)ALBP and disability after 3 months.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with (S)ALBP underwent a baseline PPT evaluation in rest and during a CPM protocol. Patients were asked to fill in self-report questionnaires: the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) and the Illness Perception Questionnaire - Brief version (IPQ-B). At 3-month follow-up, participants were asked to fill in the QBPDS again. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to determine associations between baseline factors and disability at follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients participated at follow-up. Because of the multicollinearity issue, the TSK score was selected for analyses and the PCS and IPQ-B score were excluded from the model. No significant associations between baseline factors and disability at follow-up were found.

CONCLUSION

Neither baseline psychological factors nor PPTs or CPM in (S)ALBP were significantly associated with disability after 3 months. Our multiple linear regression analysis was likely underpowered to detect significant associations.

Acute exercise of painful muscles does not reduce the hypoalgesic response in young healthy women - a randomized crossover study

OBJECTIVES

Exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) is characterized by an increase in pain threshold following acute exercise. EIH is reduced in some individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain, although the mechanisms are unknown. It has been hypothesized that this may relate to whether exercises are performed in painful or non-painful body regions. The primary aim of this randomized experimental crossover study was to investigate whether the presence of pain per se in the exercising muscles reduced the local EIH response. The secondary aim was to investigate if EIH responses were also reduced in non-exercising remote muscles.

METHODS

Pain-free women (n=34) participated in three separate sessions. In session 1, the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) for a single legged isometric knee extension exercise was determined. In sessions 2 and 3, pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were assessed at the thigh and shoulder muscles before and after a 3-min exercise at 30 % of MVC. Exercises were performed with or without thigh muscle pain, which was induced by either a painful injection (hypertonic saline, 5.8 %) or a non-painful injection (isotonic saline, 0.9 %) into the thigh muscle. Muscle pain intensity was assessed with an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) at baseline, after injections, during and after exercises.

RESULTS

PPTs increased at thigh and shoulder muscles after exercise with painful (14.0-24.9 %) and non-painful (14.3-19.5 %) injections and no significant between-injection EIH differences were observed (p>0.30). Muscle pain intensity was significantly higher following the painful injection compared to the non-painful injection (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Exercising painful muscles did not reduce the local or remote hypoalgesic responses, suggesting that the pain-relieving effects of isometric exercises are not reduced by exercising painful body regions.

ETHICAL COMMITTEE NUMBER

S-20210184.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05299268.

Assessing the Feasibility of a Multimodal Approach to Pain Evaluation in Early Stages after Spinal Cord Injury

This research evaluates the feasibility of a multimodal pain assessment protocol during rehabilitation following spinal cord injury (SCI). The protocol amalgamates clinical workup (CW), quantitative sensory testing (QST), and psychosocial factors (PSF) administered at 4 (T1), 12 (T2), and 24 (T3) weeks post injury and at discharge (T4). Molecular blood biomarkers (BB) were evaluated via gene expression and proteomic assays at T1 and T4. Different pain trajectories and temporal changes were identified using QST, with inflammation and pain-related biomarkers recorded. Higher concentrations of osteopontin and cystatin-C were found in SCI patients compared to healthy controls, indicating their potential as biomarkers. We observed altered inflammatory responses and a slight increase in ICAM-1 and CCL3 were noted, pointing towards changes in cellular adhesion linked with spinal injury and a possible connection with neuropathic pain. Despite a small patient sample hindering the correlation of feasibility data, descriptive statistical analyses were conducted on stress, depression, anxiety, quality of life, and pain interferences. The SCI Pain Instrument (SCIPI) was efficient in distinguishing between nociceptive and neuropathic pain, showing a progressive increase in severity over time. The findings emphasize the need for the careful consideration of recruitment setting and protocol adjustments to enhance the feasibility of multimodal pain evaluation studies post SCI. They also shed light on potential early adaptive mechanisms in SCI pathophysiology, warranting the further exploration of prognostic and preventive strategies for chronic pain in the SCI population.

Deficits in the thalamocortical pathway associated with hypersensitivity to pain in patients with frozen shoulder

Background and purpose

Frozen shoulder (FS) is a chronic pain condition and has been shown to be associated with pain sensitization. However, the underyling brain mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we aimed to explore brain alterations and their association with pain sensitization in patients with FS.

Materials and methods

A total of 54 FS patients and 52 healthy controls (HCs) were included in this study. Here, we applied both structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques to investigate brain abnormalities in FS patients. Voxel-wise comparisons were performed to reveal the differences in the gray matter volume (GMV) and amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) between FS patients and HCs. Furthermore, the region of interest (ROI) to whole-brain functional connectivity (FC) was calculated and compared between groups. Finally, Pearson's correlation coefficients were computed to reveal the association between clinical data and brain alterations.

Results

Four main findings were observed: (1) FS patients exhibited decreased thalamus GMV, which correlated with pain intensity and pain threshold; (2) relative to HCs, FS patients exhibited a higher level of ALFF within the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the thalamus; (3) FS patients exhibited a significant increase in Tha-S1 FC compared to HCs; and (4) the effect of thalamus GMV on pain intensity was mediated by pain threshold in FS patients.

Conclusion

The dysfunctional thalamus might induce pain hypersensitivity, which further aggravates the pain in FS patients.

An electronical stimulator for quantitative sensory testing and evoked potential analysis of tactile Aβ nerve fibers

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the ability of an innovative device, the Cutaneous Mechanical Stimulator (CMS), to evaluate touch sensory pathways in Human.

METHODS

Two experiments were conducted in 23 healthy volunteers aged 20-30 years. In the first, mechanical detection thresholds (MDTs) were assessed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and the CMS. In the second experiment, touch-evoked potentials (TEPs) elicited by tactile stimulation of the CMS on the left hand dorsum and left foot dorsum were recorded. Electroencephalographic (EEG) data were recorded at each cutaneous stimulation site in blocks of 20 tactile stimulations delivered by the CMS. The data were segmented into 1000-ms epochs.

RESULTS

MDTs measured by monofilaments and by the CMS were equivalent. Analyses of TEPs showed N2 and P2 components. The latencies of the N2 components on the hand dorsum and foot dorsum resulted in an estimated average conduction velocity of about 40 m.s^-1, within the range of Aβ fibers.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings showed that the CMS could assess touch sensory pathways in young adults.

SIGNIFICANCE

The CMS can offer new research perspectives, as this device allows easy assessment of the MDT and enables estimation of fiber conduction velocities after tactile stimulation by the device synchronized with EEG recordings.

Peripheral sensory function in non-freezing cold injury patients and matched controls

NEW FINDINGS

What is the central question of this study? Is peripheral sensory function impaired in the chronic phase of non-freezing cold injury (NFCI)? What is the main finding and its importance? Warm and mechanical detection thresholds are elevated and intraepidermal nerve fibre density is reduced in individuals with NFCI in their feet when compared to matched controls. This indicates impaired sensory function in individuals with NFCI. Interindividual variation was observed in all groups, and therefore a diagnostic cut-off for NFCI has yet to be established. Longitudinal studies are required to follow NFCI progression from formation to resolution ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to compare peripheral sensory neural function of individuals with non-freezing cold injury (NFCI) with matched controls (without NFCI) with either similar (COLD) or minimal previous cold exposure (CON). Thirteen individuals with chronic NFCI in their feet were matched with the control groups for sex, age, race, fitness, body mass index and foot volume. All undertook quantitative sensory testing (QST) on the foot. Intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD) was assessed 10 cm above the lateral malleolus in nine NFCI and 12 COLD participants. Warm detection threshold was higher at the great toe in NFCI than COLD (NFCI 45.93 (4.71)°C vs. COLD 43.44 (2.72)°C, P = 0.046), but was non-significantly different from CON (CON 43.92 (5.01)°C, P = 0.295). Mechanical detection threshold on the dorsum of the foot was higher in NFCI (23.61 (33.59) mN) than in CON (3.83 (3.69) mN, P = 0.003), but was non-significantly different from COLD (10.49 (5.76) mN, P > 0.999). Remaining QST measures did not differ significantly between groups. IENFD was lower in NFCI than COLD (NFCI 8.47 (2.36) fibre/mm2 vs. COLD 11.93 (4.04) fibre/mm2 , P = 0.020). Elevated warm and mechanical detection thresholds may indicate hyposensitivity to sensory stimuli in the injured foot for individuals with NFCI and may be due to reduced innervation given the reduction in IENFD. Longitudinal studies are required to identify the progression of sensory neuropathy from the formation of injury to its resolution, with appropriate control groups employed.

Mechanisms of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for patients with chronic primary low back pain: protocol for a mechanistic randomised placebo-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a highly prevalent and disabling condition. Identifying subgroups of patients afflicted with CLBP is a current research priority, for which a classification system based on pain mechanisms was proposed. Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is recommended for the management of CLBP. Yet, little data are available regarding its mechanisms of action, making it difficult to match this intervention to the patients who may benefit the most. It was suggested that SMT may influence mechanisms associated with central sensitisation. Therefore, classifying patients with CLBP according to central sensitisation mechanisms may help predict their response to SMT.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol describes a randomised placebo-controlled trial aiming to examine which variables linked to central sensitisation may help predict the clinical response to SMT in a cohort of patients with CLBP. One hundred patients with chronic primary low back pain will be randomised to receive 12 sessions of SMT or placebo SMT over a 4-week period. Pain intensity and disability will be assessed as primary outcomes after completing the 4-week treatment (primary endpoint), and at 4-week and 12-week follow-ups. Baseline values of two pain questionnaires, lumbar pressure pain thresholds, concentrations of an inflammatory cytokine and expectations of pain relief will be entered as predictors of the response to SMT in a multiple regression model. Changes in these variables after treatment will be used in a second multiple regression model. The reference values of these predictors will be measured from 50 age and sex-matched healthy controls to allow interpretation of values in patients. Mixed analyses of variance will also be conducted to compare the primary outcomes and the predictors between groups (SMT vs placebo) over time (baseline vs post-treatment).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was granted by the Fundación Jiménez Díaz Clinical Research Ethics Committee.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05162924.

Sensory function in the faces of patients with facial palsy: A prospective observational study using quantitative sensory testing

Objectives/Hypothesis

To determine the sensory function of both sides of the face in patients with acute or chronic facial palsy.

Study design

Prospective observational study.

Methods

The standardized quantitative sensory testing (QST) protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS), including thermal or mechanical stimuli (touch, pain, vibration, and pressure), was used to investigate somatosensory function in the faces of patients. A patient-reported outcome measures for the assessment of disturbed facial comfort or facial pain, the facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale (FaCE) Facial Comfort Subscale, and the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) pain subdomain were used.

Results

A total of 29 patients (22 female, median age of 48 years; 7 acute palsy; 22 chronic palsy; House-Brackmann grade II-VI) were included. The median FaCE Facial Comfort Subscale score and the median SF-36 pain subdomain score were 50 and 100, respectively. Most patients had, at an individual level, a normal sensory function in all or most tests. On average, the frequencies for all parameters were not different between the paretic side and the contralateral side (all p > 0.05). Additionally, when z-scores were used to compare our patient sample with healthy controls from the DFNS reference database, there was no difference between the paretic side and the contralateral side (all p > 0.05). Furthermore, there were no differences between patients with acute facial palsy and those with chronic facial palsy (all p > 0.05). The FaCE Facial Comfort Subscale score and the SF-36 pain subdomain score did not correlate with the QST parameters (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Patients with acute or chronic unilateral peripheral facial palsy had normal sensory function on the paretic and contralateral sides compared with the reference values of healthy controls, and there was no significant difference between the sides. The numbness frequently felt in the affected hemiface is not related to a peripheral sensory disorder and is most likely a manifestation of an unsolved cortical somatosensory-motor mismatch.

Somatosensory and Gustatory Profiling in the Orofacial Region

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a standard procedure in medicine to describe sensory patterns in various pathologies. The aim of this prospective clinical study was to define reference values of the trigeminal nerve (V3), including taste qualities, to create a compatibility for sensory loss or gain in pathologies. Fifty-one patients were included, and a standardized testing battery with 11 QST parameters according to the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) was applied complemented by quantitative gustatory assessments. Significant somatosensory differences were found between the test sites (MDT at the chin, WDT at the lower lip) but no effect was detected for gender, age, and between body types. Taste sensitivity was dependent on concentration, gender (females being more sensitive) and increasing age (for bitter and sour taste). We provide reference values for somatosensory and gustatory testing of the facial area. Our data facilitate the detection of neurosensory abnormalities in the orofacial region. This might also serve as a control setting for COVID-19.

[Quantitative sensory testing for neuropathic pain and its relevance for physiotherapy]

BACKGROUND

Neuropathic pain syndromes are typically characterized by high chronification rates as well as long and intensive pain episodes. Early and accurate diagnosis of neuropathic pain is a basic skill of physiotherapists and other medical professionals, may allow for appropriate medical treatment and help to prevent possible consequential damage. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) can be applied as a supplement to conventional neurological bedside testing in the evaluation of neuropathic pain. Over recent decades, QST has come to hold a significant position in the field of pain research. However, despite these developments, the application of QST in clinical practice has lagged behind.

OBJECTIVES

What is the value of QST in the study of neuropathic pain? Have the conditions for personal clinical use of the QST been established in physiotherapy practice? Have the pathways for specific implementation of the QST been defined?

METHOD

Literature research as part of a Bachelor thesis in Physiotherapy.

RESULTS

QST constitutes a valid examination tool that is able to evaluate the complete somatosensory profile. In this way, QST may provide substantial additional benefit in the examination of neuropathic pain patients compared to other conventional testing procedures, especially when it comes to small-fibre neuropathies. These small fibres seem to be particularly affected in asymptomatic patients as well as early phases of neuropathies and cannot be investigated via conventional testing procedures. This makes the use of partial aspects of the QST a proven instrument for physiotherapists and medical staff, which was particularly useful in the decision-making process for neuropathies.

DISCUSSION

Nonetheless, regarding the results, there are still several limiting factors that hamper the routine use of QST. Some of these can be resolved by precisely adhering to testing protocols and taking precautions. Other highly relevant issues for clinical practice, such as the immense cost of equipment and the excessive time required for testing, have not been satisfactorily overcome as yet. Less comprehensive testing protocols as well as the innovation of handy and cost-effective testing devices might offer initial approaches to enhance the widespread use of QST. Complementing conventional bedside testing by adding thermal discrimination tests and pain detection threshold tests might prove to be another possibility to integrate the benefit of QST into clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

QST makes a significant contribution to the investigation and diagnosis of neuropathies. Physiotherapists are encouraged to implement partial aspects of the QST in a standard examination in order to have a positive effect on both early detection and treatment.

Multidimensional pain phenotypes after Traumatic Brain Injury

More than 50% of individuals develop chronic pain following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Research suggests that a significant portion of post-TBI chronic pain conditions is neuropathic in nature, yet the relationship between neuropathic pain, psychological distress, and somatosensory function following TBI is not fully understood. This study evaluated neuropathic pain symptoms, psychological and somatosensory function, and psychosocial factors in individuals with TBI (TBI, N = 38). A two-step cluster analysis was used to identify phenotypes based on the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory and Beck's Anxiety Inventory scores. Phenotypes were then compared on pain characteristics, psychological and somatosensory function, and psychosocial factors. Our analyses resulted in two different neuropathic pain phenotypes: (1) Moderate neuropathic pain severity and anxiety scores (MNP-AS, N = 11); and (2) mild or no neuropathic pain symptoms and anxiety scores (LNP-AS, N = 27). Furthermore, the MNP-AS group exhibited greater depression, PTSD, pain severity, and affective distress scores than the LNP-AS group. In addition, thermal somatosensory function (difference between thermal pain and perception thresholds) was significantly lower in the MNP-AS compared to the LNP-AS group. Our findings suggest that neuropathic pain symptoms are relatively common after TBI and are not only associated with greater psychosocial distress but also with abnormal function of central pain processing pathways.

Association of sensory phenotype with quality of life, functionality, and emotional well-being in patients suffering from neuropathic pain

ABSTRACT

Neuropathic pain highly affects quality of life, well-being, and function. It has recently been shown based on cluster analysis studies that most patients with neuropathic pain may be categorized into 1 of 3 sensory phenotypes: sensory loss, mechanical hyperalgesia, and thermal hyperalgesia. If these phenotypes reflect underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, they may be more relevant for patient management than underlying neurological diagnosis or pain intensity. The aim of this study was thus to examine the impact of these sensory phenotypes on mental health, functionality, and quality of life. Data of 433 patients from the IMI/EuroPain network database were analyzed, and results of HADS-D/A, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Euro Quality of Life 5D/-VAS, Brief Pain Inventory, and Graded Chronic Pain Scale between the sensory phenotypes were compared using multiple regression analysis. There was no difference in chronic pain grade, pain intensity, depression, or anxiety scores between phenotypes. Pain interference (Brief Pain Inventory) was higher (P = 0.002); self-reported health state lower (Euro Quality of Life 5D VAS, P = 0.02); and problems regarding mobility (P = 0.008), usual activities (P = 0.004), and self-care (P = 0.039) more prominent (EQ5-D) in the sensory loss compared with the thermal hyperalgesia phenotype. Patients with sensory loss also showed higher pain catastrophizing scores (P = 0.006 and 0.022, respectively) compared with the 2 other groups. Sensory phenotype is associated with the impact of neuropathic pain conditions on well-being, daily functionality, and quality of life but is less associated with pain intensity. These results suggest that the somatosensory phenotype should be considered for personalized pain management.

Personal influencing factors for pressure pain threshold in healthy people: A systematic review and meta-analysis

All studies that investigated personal factors influencing pressure pain threshold (PPT) in healthy people were synthesized. Data was summarized, and risk of bias (RoB) and level of evidence were determined. Results were pooled per influencing factor, grouped by body region and included in meta-analyses. Fifty-four studies were eligible. Five had low, nine moderate, and 40 high RoB. Following meta-analyses, a strong conclusion was found for the influence of scapular position, a moderate for the influence of gender, and a weak for the influence of age (shoulder/arm region) and blood pressure on PPT. In addition, body mass index, gender (leg region), alcohol consumption and pain vigilance may not influence PPT. Based on qualitative summary, depression and menopause may not influence PPT. For other variables there was only preliminary or conflicting evidence. However, caution is advised, since the majority of included studies showed a high RoB and several were not eligible to include in meta-analyses. Heterogeneity was high in the performed meta-analyses, and most conclusions were weak. More standardized research is necessary.

Corneal Confocal Microscopy Identifies People with Type 1 Diabetes with More Rapid Corneal Nerve Fibre Loss and Progression of Neuropathy

There is a need to accurately identify patients with diabetes at higher risk of developing and progressing diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Fifty subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) and sixteen age matched healthy controls underwent detailed neuropathy assessments including symptoms, signs, quantitative sensory testing (QST), nerve conduction studies (NCS), intra epidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) at baseline and after 2 years of follow-up. Overall, people with type 1 diabetes mellitus showed no significant change in HbA1c, blood pressure, lipids or neuropathic symptoms, signs, QST, neurophysiology, IENFD and CCM over 2 years. However, a sub-group (n = 11, 22%) referred to as progressors, demonstrated rapid corneal nerve fiber loss (RCNFL) with a reduction in corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD) (p = 0.0006), branch density (CNBD) (p = 0.0002), fiber length (CNFL) (p = 0.0002) and sural (p = 0.04) and peroneal (p = 0.05) nerve conduction velocities, which was not related to a change in HbA1c or cardiovascular risk factors. The majority of people with T1DM and good risk factor control do not show worsening of neuropathy over 2 years. However, CCM identifies a sub-group of people with T1DM who show a more rapid decline in corneal nerve fibers and nerve conduction velocity.

Pain sensitivities predict prophylactic treatment outcomes of flunarizine in chronic migraine patients: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the differences in quantitative sensory testing between chronic migraine and healthy controls and to explore the association between pain sensitivities and outcomes in chronic migraine following preventive treatment.

METHODS

In this prospective open-label study, preventive-naïve chronic migraine and healthy controls were recruited, and cold, heat, mechanical punctate, and pressure pain thresholds over the dermatomes of first branch of trigeminal nerve and first thoracic nerve were measured by quantitative sensory testing at baseline. Chronic migraines were treated with flunarizine and treatment response was defined as ≥50% reduction in the number of monthly headache days over the 12-week treatment period.

RESULTS

Eighty-four chronic migraines and fifty age-and-sex-matched healthy controls were included in the analysis. The chronic migraine had higher cold pain thresholds over the dermatomes of the first branch of trigeminal nerve and the first thoracic nerve (p < 0.001 and < 0.001), lower pressure pain thresholds over the dermatomes of the first thoracic nerve (p = 0.003), heat pain thresholds over the dermatomes of the first branch of the trigeminal nerve and the first thoracic nerve (p < 0.001 and p = 0.015) than healthy controls. After treatment, 24/84 chronic migraine had treatment response. The responders with relatively normal pain sensitivity had higher heat pain thresholds over the dermatome of the first branch of the trigeminal nerve (p = 0.002), mechanical punctate pain thresholds over the dermatomes of the first branch of the trigeminal nerve (p = 0.023), and pressure pain thresholds over the dermatomes of the first branch of the trigeminal nerve (p = 0.026) than the hypersensitive non-responders. Decision tree analysis showed that patients with mechanical punctate pain threshold over the dermatomes of the first branch of the trigeminal nerve > 158 g (p = 0.020) or heat pain threshold over the dermatome of the first branch of the trigeminal nerve > 44.9°C (p = 0.002) were more likely to be responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic migraine were generally more sensitive compared to healthy controls. Preventive treatment with flunarizine should be recommended particularly for chronic migraine who have relatively normal sensitivity to mechanical punctate or heat pain.Trial registration: This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02747940).

Modified Sensory Testing in Non-verbal Patients Receiving Novel Intrathecal Therapies for Neurological Disorders

Several neurological disorders may be amenable to treatment with gene-targeting therapies such as antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) or viral vector-based gene therapy. The US FDA has approved several of these treatments; many others are in clinical trials. Preclinical toxicity studies of ASO candidates have identified dose-dependent neurotoxicity patterns. These include degeneration of dorsal root ganglia, the cell bodies of peripheral sensory neurons. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) refers to a series of standardized mechanical and/or thermal measures that complement clinical neurologic examination in detecting sensory dysfunction. QST primarily relies on patient self-report or task performance (i.e., button-pushing). This brief report illustrates individualized pragmatic approaches to QST in non-verbal subjects receiving early phase investigational intrathecal drug therapies as a component of clinical trial safety protocols. Three children with neurodevelopmental disorders that include Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis Type 7, Ataxia-Telangiectasia, and Epilepsy of Infancy with Migrating Focal Seizures are presented. These case studies discuss individualized testing protocols, accounting for disease presentation, cognitive and motor function. We outline specific considerations for developing assessments for detecting changes in sensory processing in diverse patient groups and safety monitoring trials of early phase investigational intrathecal drug therapies. QST may complement information obtained from the standard neurologic examination, electrophysiologic studies, skin biopsies, and imaging. QST has limitations and challenges, especially in non-verbal subjects, as shown in the three cases discussed in this report. Future directions call for collaborative efforts to generate sensory datasets and share data registries in the pediatric neurology field.

Small-Fiber-Neuropathien

Die Small-Fiber-Neuropathie (SFN) ist eine Erkrankung des peripheren Nervensystems aufgrund einer isolierten oder vorwiegenden Schädigung dünn myelinisierter Aδ-Fasern und/oder unmyelinisierter C‑Fasern. Für die sichere Diagnose einer SFN ist neben der klinischen Symptomatik mit Schmerzen und Sensibilitätsstörungen, typischerweise mit distal betonter Ausbreitung, der apparative Nachweis einer Rarefizierung oder einer Funktionsstörung der dünn myelinisierten Aδ-Fasern und/oder der unmyelinisierten C‑Fasern gefordert. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird eine Übersicht über die diagnostischen Verfahren zum Nachweis einer SFN sowie über mögliche Ursachen und Behandlungsoptionen gegeben.

Responsiveness of quantitative sensory testing-derived sensory phenotype to disease-modifying intervention in patients with entrapment neuropathy: a longitudinal study

ABSTRACT

The German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) quantitative sensory testing (QST) method for sensory phenotyping is used to stratify patients by mechanism-associated sensory phenotype, theorised to be predictive of intervention efficacy. We hypothesised that change in pain and sensory dysfunction would relate to change in sensory phenotype. We investigated the responsiveness of sensory phenotype to surgery in patients with an entrapment neuropathy. With ethical approval and consent, this observational study recruited patients with neurophysiologically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome. Symptom and pain severity parameters and DFNS QST were evaluated before and after carpal tunnel surgery. Surgical outcome was evaluated by patient-rated change. Symptom severity score of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire and associated pain and paraesthesia subgroups were comparators for clinically relevant change. Quantitative sensory testing results (n = 76) were compared with healthy controls (n = 54). At 6 months postsurgery, 92% participants reported a good surgical outcome and large decrease in pain and symptom severity (P < 0.001). Change in QST parameters occurred for thermal detection, thermal pain, and mechanical detection thresholds with a moderate to large effect size. Change in mechanical pain measures was not statistically significant. Change occurred in sensory phenotype postsurgery (P < 0.001); sensory phenotype was associated with symptom subgroup (P = 0.03) and patient-rated surgical outcome (P = 0.02). Quantitative sensory testing-derived sensory phenotype is sensitive to clinically important change. In an entrapment neuropathy model, sensory phenotype was associated with patient-reported symptoms and demonstrated statistically significant, clinically relevant change after disease-modifying intervention. Sensory phenotype was independent of disease severity and may reflect underlying neuropathophysiology.

Central sensitisation in chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia; a case control study

INTRODUCTION

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and fibromyalgia (FM) are both complex conditions that are challenging to treat. This may be related to an incomplete understanding of their pathophysiology, itself obfuscated by their heterogeneity. The symptomatic overlap between them and their common comorbidity suggests a shared vulnerability, which might be explained by central sensitisation.

METHODS

19 CFS cases, 19 FM cases and 20 age and sex matched healthy controls (HC) were recruited primarily from secondary care clinics in London. Those with other pain disorders, psychiatric diagnoses and those taking centrally acting or opiate medications were excluded. Participants were asked to abstain from alcohol and over the counter analgaesia 48 h prior to assessment by static and dynamic quantitative sensory tests, including measures of temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM).

RESULTS

CS, as defined by the presence of both enhanced TS and inefficient CPM, was present in 16 (84%) CFS cases, 18 (95%) FM cases, and none of the HC (p < 0.001). Pressure pain thresholds were lower in CFS (Median222kPaIQR 146-311; p = 0.04) and FM cases (Median 189 kPa; IQR 129-272; p = 0.003) compared to HC (Median 311 kPa; IQR 245-377). FM cases differed from HC in cold-induced (FM = 22.6 °C (15.3-27.7) vs HC = 14.2 °C (9.0-20.5); p = 0.01) and heat-induced (FM = 38.0 °C (35.2-44.0) vs HC = 45.3 °C (40.1-46.8); p = 0.03) pain thresholds, where CFS cases did not.

CONCLUSION

Central sensitisation may be a common endophenotype in chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. Further research should address whether central sensitisation is a cause or effect of these disorders.

Nociplastic Pain Criteria or Recognition of Central Sensitization? Pain Phenotyping in the Past, Present and Future

Recently, the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) released clinical criteria and a grading system for nociplastic pain affecting the musculoskeletal system. These criteria replaced the 2014 clinical criteria for predominant central sensitization (CS) pain and accounted for clinicians' need to identify (early) and correctly classify patients having chronic pain according to the pain phenotype. Still, clinicians and researchers can become confused by the multitude of terms and the variety of clinical criteria available. Therefore, this paper aims at (1) providing an overview of what preceded the IASP criteria for nociplastic pain ('the past'); (2) explaining the new IASP criteria for nociplastic pain in comparison with the 2014 clinical criteria for predominant CS pain ('the present'); and (3) highlighting key areas for future implementation and research work in this area ('the future'). It is explained that the 2021 IASP clinical criteria for nociplastic pain are in line with the 2014 clinical criteria for predominant CS pain but are more robust, comprehensive, better developed and hold more potential. Therefore, the 2021 IASP clinical criteria for nociplastic pain are important steps towards precision pain medicine, yet studies examining the clinimetric and psychometric properties of the criteria are urgently needed.

C-tactile touch perception in patients with chronic pain disorders

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. C-tactile stimulation in patients with chronic pain results in reduced pleasantness perception. Results suggest impaired C-tactile function with functional loss of pleasant touch perception in patients with postherpetic neuralgia.

Introduction:

Slow brushing over the skin activates C-tactile nerve fibers that transmit pleasant tactile experiences in healthy subjects, leading to an inverted U-shaped velocity dependence of ratings: C-tactile optimal stroking stimulations are rated as more pleasant than slower or faster stimulations. Chronic pain diseases such as postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) and complex regional pain syndrome show altered C-fiber innervation density, sensory loss, and pain sensitization.

Objectives:

We aimed to investigate whether C-tactile function is affected in painful conditions.

Methods:

We assessed psychophysically C-tactile function and sensory perception thresholds in 16 patients with PHN, 19 patients with complex regional pain syndrome, and 22 healthy controls.

Results:

Assessment of C-tactile function showed a significantly altered perceived pleasantness of CT stimulation between healthy controls and patients with chronic pain. In specific, tactile stimulation was perceived less pleasant on the affected and contralateral side when compared with controls. In patients with PHN, velocity-dependent pleasantness ratings could not be obtained, suggesting highly impaired C-tactile function with functional loss of pleasant touch perception.

Conclusions:

In conclusion, this is the first report of impaired C-tactile function in patients with PHN. Reduced pleasantness resulting from gentle touch can reflect defective C-fiber function or result from central nervous system effects in a chronic pain state.

Pain Study in X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy in Males and Females

INTRODUCTION

X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) is a metabolic disorder in which very long chain fatty acids (VLCFAs) are accumulated in the nervous system and adrenal cortex, impairing their functions. Three main variants are described in males: adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN), a cerebral form (cALD or cAMN) and Addison's disease only (AD), while for females no classification is used. To evaluate pain and the functional state of afferent fibers, a series of tests was carried out in male and female patients.

METHODS

Chronic pain occurrence and sensory phenotype profile were assessed in 30 patients (20 male: 10 AMN, 1 cAMN, 1 cALD, 8 AD; and 10 female). A set of instruments assessed the intensity, quality and extent of pain, while a battery of quantitative sensory testing (QST) procedures examined the functional status of Aβ and Aδ fibers. Principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering with sensory responses input were used to identify distinct clusters.

RESULTS

Nearly half of the subjects reported pain, with a high prevalence in females and male AMN patients. No sex differences in pain dimensions were found. The sensory responses were heterogeneous, differing among the clinical variants and between genders. Male AMN/cAMN/cALD patients showed the worst impairment. Aβ and Aδ fibers were affected in males and females, but Aβ fibers appeared undamaged in females when tactile sensitivity was tested. Abnormal responses were localized in the lower body district, according to the dying-back pattern of the neuropathy. Cluster analysis showed discrete clusters for each function examined, with well-interpretable sensory and clinical phenotypes.

CONCLUSION

The study of pain and of the sensory profile appears to indicate a difference in the mechanisms underlying the AMN/cAMN/cALD and AD clinical forms and in the treatment of the respective generated pain types.

Contralateral Sensory and Pain Perception Changes in Patients With Unilateral Neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

To test whether contralateral sensory abnormalities in the clinically unaffected area of patients with unilateral neuropathic pain are due to the neuropathy or pain mechanisms.

METHODS

We analyzed the contralateral clinically unaffected side of patients with unilateral painful or painless neuropathy (peripheral nerve injury [PNI], postherpetic neuropathy [PHN], radiculopathy) by standardized quantitative sensory testing following a validated protocol. Primary outcome was the independent contribution of the following variables on the contralateral sensory function using generalized linear regression models: pain intensity, disease duration, etiology, body area, and sensory patterns in the most painful area.

RESULTS

Among 424 patients (PNI n = 256, PHN n = 78, radiculopathy n = 90), contralateral sensory abnormalities were frequent in both painful (n = 383) and painless (n = 41) unilateral neuropathy, demonstrating sensory loss for thermal and mechanical nonpainful stimuli and both sensory loss and gain for painful test stimuli. Analysis by etiology revealed contralateral pinprick hyperalgesia in PHN and PNI. Analysis by ipsilateral sensory phenotype demonstrated mirror-image pinprick hyperalgesia in both mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia phenotypes. Pain intensity, etiology, and affected body region predicted changes in only single contralateral somatosensory parameters. Disease duration had no impact on the contralateral sensory function.

CONCLUSION

Mechanisms of sensory loss seem to spread to the contralateral side in both painful and painless neuropathies. Contralateral spread of pinprick hyperalgesia was restricted to the 2 ipsilateral phenotypes that suggest sensitization; this suggest a contribution of descending net facilitation from supraspinal areas, which was reported in rodent models of neuropathic pain but not yet in human patients.

No pain, still gain (of function): the relation between sensory profiles and the presence or absence of self-reported pain in a large multicenter cohort of patients with neuropathy

ABSTRACT

The pathophysiology of pain in neuropathy is complex and may be linked to sensory phenotypes. Quantitative sensory testing, a standardized method to evaluate sensory profiles in response to defined stimuli, assesses functional integrity of small and large nerve fiber afferents and central somatosensory pathways. It has revealed detailed insights into mechanisms of neuropathy, yet it remains unclear if pain directly affects sensory profiles. The main objective of this study was to investigate sensory profiles in patients with various neuropathic conditions, including polyneuropathy, mononeuropathy, and lesions to the central nervous system, in relation to self-reported presence or absence of pain and pain sensitivity using the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire. A total of 443 patients (332 painful and 111 painless) and 112 healthy participants were investigated. Overall, loss of sensation was equally prevalent in patients with and without spontaneous pain. Pain thresholds were equally lowered in both patient groups, demonstrating that hyperalgesia and allodynia are just as present in patients not reporting any pain. Remarkably, this was similar for dynamic mechanical allodynia. Hypoalgesia was more pronounced in painful polyneuropathy, whereas hyperalgesia was more frequent in painful mononeuropathy (compared with painless conditions). Self-reported pain sensitivity was significantly higher in painful than in painless neuropathic conditions. Our results reveal the presence of hyperalgesia and allodynia in patients with central and peripheral lesions of the somatosensory system not reporting spontaneous pain. This shows that symptoms and signs of hypersensitivity may not necessarily coincide and that painful and painless neuropathic conditions may mechanistically blend into one another.