Progression to recurrent acute pancreatitis after a first attack of acute pancreatitis in adults

Risk of and factors influencing the progression from acute to recurrent acute to chronic pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES & AIMS

Acute pancreatitis (AP) recurrence rates range from 11 to 36 % yet accurately predicting recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) and its progression to chronic pancreatitis (CP) after an initial episode remains challenging. Thus, this study explored the risk factors contributing to RAP and its progression to CP.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with AP from three tertiary medical centers between January 2010 and December 2017. The patients were followed up for up to 60 months. The primary endpoint was the incidence of RAP and CP; risk factors influencing these outcomes were also identified.

RESULTS

Overall, 501 patients were included, of which 164 (32.7 %) experienced RAP, and 71 (14.2 %) progressed to CP. The leading causes of AP were alcohol consumption (43.1 %), gallstones (41.5 %) and hypertriglyceridemia (4.4 %). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that smoking (HR, 4.09; 95 % CI, 2.752-6.078, p < 0.001), and organ failure after 48 h of hospitalization (HR, 3.52; 95 % CI, 1.22-10.19, p < 0.02) were significant risk factors for RAP. Significant risk factors for progression to CP included age over 60 years (HR, 5.29; 95 % CI, 1.25-22.47, p = 0.024), smoking (HR, 2.50; 95 % CI, 1.04-6.01, p = 0.04), alcohol consumption (HR, 8.79; 95 % CI, 2.06-37.43, p = 0.003), computed tomography severity index (CTSI) (HR, 1.22; 95 % CI, 1.04-1.44, p = 0.015), and recurrence of AP (HR, 70.69; 95 % CI, 2.61-1914.86, p = 0.011). In alcohol-induced RAP patients, ≥3 recurrences (HR, 4.18; 95 % CI, 1.75-9.98, p = 0.001) was significant risk factor for progression to CP.

CONCLUSIONS

Alcohol consumption was the predominant cause of AP and RAP. The severity of the initial AP episode was the key determinant for RAP, and RAP was the most significant risk factor for the progression to CP. Therefore, smoking and alcohol cessation are important to prevent the development of recurrent AP and CP during long-term follow-up.

Ubiquitin-specific protease 7 exacerbates acute pancreatitis progression by enhancing ATF4-mediated autophagy

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a serious inflammatory disease with high incidence rate and mortality. It was confirmed that overactivation of autophagy in acinar cells can increase the risk of AP. Nevertheless, the regulatory mechanism of autophagy in AP is unclear. The role of ubiquitin-specific peptidase 7 (USP7) in controlling autophagy during AP development was examined in this study. AR42J cells were subjected to caerulein to establish a cell model of AP. ELISA utilized to assess IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α secretion levels. Cell viability and death were detected using CCK8 assay and flow cytometry, respectively. The interaction between USP7 and ATF4 was analyzed by Co-IP assay. USP7 and ATF4 were abnormally overexpressed in AP patients and cellular models. Loss of function of USP7 increased cell viability, but alleviated cell death and secretions of inflammatory cytokines including IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α in AP cellular models. Importantly, autophagy level was activated in AP cells, and could be repressed after USP7 knockdown, and rapamycin treatment greatly diminished the beneficial functions mediated by USP7 downregulation in AP cells. Mechanically, ATF4, an activator of stress autophagy in AP, was proved to be a deubiquitination modification target downstream of USP7, and its protein stability was weakened after USP7 reduction. ATF4 upregulation abolished the protective effect of USP7 silencing on caerulein-induced autophagy, inflammation, and cell injury in AR42J cells. USP7 knockdown reduced inflammation and cell injury during AP progression by inhibiting ATF4-mediated autophagy activation.

Application of a Machine Learning Predictive Model for Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Acute pancreatitis is the main cause of hospitalization for pancreatic disease. Some patients tend to have recurrent episodes after experiencing an episode of acute pancreatitis. This study aimed to construct predictive models for recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP).

METHODS

A total of 531 patients who were hospitalized for the first episode of acute pancreatitis at the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from January 2018 to December 2019 were enrolled in the study. We confirmed whether the patients had a second episode until December 31, 2021, through an electronic medical record system and telephone or WeChat follow-up. Clinical and follow-up data of patients were collected and randomly allocated to the training and test sets at a ratio of 7:3. The training set was used to select the best model, and the selected model was tested with the test set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, decision curve, and calibration plots were used to assess the efficacy of the models. Shapley additive explanation values were used to explain the model.

RESULTS

Considering multiple indices, XGBoost was the best model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the XGBoost model in the test set were 0.779, 0.763, 0.883, 0.647, 0.341, and 0.922, respectively. According to the Shapley additive explanation values, drinking, smoking, higher levels of triglyceride, and the occurrence of ANC are associated with RAP.

CONCLUSION

The XGBoost model shows good performance in predicting RAP, which may help identify high-risk patients.

Incidence of recurrent and chronic pancreatitis after acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Acute pancreatitis (AP) has a high incidence, and patients can develop recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) after AP.

Objectives

We aimed to estimate the pooled incidence rates (IRs), cumulative incidences, and proportions of RAP and CP after AP.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the proportion of RAP and CP after AP.

Data sources and methods

The systematic search was conducted in three (PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) databases on 19 December 2023. Articles reporting the proportion of RAP or CP in patients after the first and multiple episodes of AP were eligible. The random effects model was used to calculate the pooled IR with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The I 2 value assessed heterogeneity. The risk of bias assessment was conducted with the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool.

Results

We included 119 articles in the quantitative synthesis and 29 in the IRs calculations. Our results showed that the IR of RAP in adult patients after AP was 5.26 per 100 person-years (CI: 3.99-6.94; I 2 = 93%), while in children, it was 4.64 per 100 person-years (CI: 2.73-7.87; I 2 = 88%). We also found that the IR of CP after AP was 1.4 per 100 person-years (CI: 0.9-2; I 2 = 75%), while after RAP, it increased to 4.3 per 100 person-years (CI: 3.1-6.0; I 2 = 76%). The risk of bias was moderate in the majority of the included studies.

Conclusion

Our results showed that RAP affects many patients with AP. Compared to patients with the first AP episode, RAP leads to a threefold higher IR for developing CP.

Trial registration

Our protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021283252).

Structured alcohol cessation support program versus current practice in acute alcoholic pancreatitis (PANDA): Study protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The most important risk factor for recurrent pancreatitis after an episode of acute alcoholic pancreatitis is continuation of alcohol use. Current guidelines do not recommend any specific treatment strategy regarding alcohol cessation. The PANDA trial investigates whether implementation of a structured alcohol cessation support program prevents pancreatitis recurrence after a first episode of acute alcoholic pancreatitis.

METHODS

PANDA is a nationwide cluster randomised superiority trial. Participating hospitals are randomised for the investigational management, consisting of a structured alcohol cessation support program, or current practice. Patients with a first episode of acute pancreatitis caused by harmful drinking (AUDIT score >7 and < 16 for men and >6 and < 14 for women) will be included. The primary endpoint is recurrence of acute pancreatitis. Secondary endpoints include cessation or reduction of alcohol use, other alcohol-related diseases, mortality, quality of life, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs. The follow-up period comprises one year after inclusion.

DISCUSSION

This is the first multicentre trial with a cluster randomised trial design to investigate whether a structured alcohol cessation support program reduces recurrent acute pancreatitis in patients after a first episode of acute alcoholic pancreatitis, as compared with current practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Registry (NL8852). Prospectively registered.

CT Features of Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis: Early Phase Versus Late Phase

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the computed tomography (CT) features of recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) in the early phase and late phase.

METHODS

Recurrent acute pancreatitis data were obtained over the past 5 years. Recurrent acute pancreatitis patients were divided into 2 groups according to the time from RAP onset to performing CT examination: the early phase (first week) and late phase (after the first week) based on the 2012 revised Atlanta classification (RAC). Evaluation and comparison of patients' demographic data, RAC, CT findings, CT severity index (CTSI) score, and extrapancreatic inflammation on CT (EPIC) score were conducted in the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Hypertriglyceridemia was the most common cause of RAP in 679 of 686 patients (positive CT rate: 98.98%). Among 679 CT-positive patients, interstitial edematous pancreatitis and necrotizing pancreatitis accounted for 61.71% (419/679) and 38.29% (260/679), respectively. The CTSI and EPIC scores were higher in the late phase than in the early phase (both P 's < 0.05). The proportion of moderately severe and severe RAP patients based on RAC was higher in the late phase than in the early phase ( P < 0.05). Early-stage EPIC score was more accurate than CTSI and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores in predicting clinically severe RAP (EPIC vs CTSI; EPIC vs APACHE II, both P 's < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent acute pancreatitis is more severe in the late phase than in the early phase. The EPIC score is more indicative of clinically severe RAP than CTSI and APACHE II scores in the early phase of RAP.

The risk of recurrent pancreatitis after first episode of acute pancreatitis in relation to etiology and severity of disease: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The study aims to determine and quantify the stratified risk of recurrent pancreatitis (RP) after the first episode of acute pancreatitis in relation to etiology and severity of disease.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis in compliance with PRISMA statement standards was conducted. A search of electronic information sources was conducted to identify all studies investigating the risk of RP after the first episode of acute pancreatitis. Proportion meta-analysis models using random effects were constructed to calculate the weighted summary risks of RP. Meta-regression was performed to evaluate the effect of different variables on the pooled outcomes.

RESULTS

Analysis of 57,815 patients from 42 studies showed that the risk of RP after first episode was 19.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.5-22.1%). The risk of RP was 11.9% (10.2-13.5%) after gallstone pancreatitis, 28.7% (23.5-33.9%) after alcohol-induced pancreatitis, 30.3% (15.5-45.0%) after hyperlipidemia-induced pancreatitis, 38.1% (28.9-47.3%) after autoimmune pancreatitis, 15.1% (11.6-18.6%) after idiopathic pancreatitis, 22.0% (16.9-27.1%) after mild pancreatitis, 23.9% (12.9-34.8%) after moderate pancreatitis, 21.6% (14.6-28.7%) after severe pancreatitis, and 6.6% (4.1-9.2%) after cholecystectomy following gallstone pancreatitis. Meta-regression confirmed that the results were not affected by the year of study (P = 0.541), sample size (P = 0.064), length of follow-up (P = 0.348), and age of patients (P = 0.138) in the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of RP after the first episode of acute pancreatitis seems to be affected by the etiology of pancreatitis but not the severity of disease. The risks seem to be higher in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis, hyperlipidemia-induced pancreatitis, and alcohol-induced pancreatitis and lower in patients with gallstone pancreatitis and idiopathic pancreatitis.

Recurrence rates and risk factors for recurrence after first episode of acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There are a certain number of acute pancreatitis (AP) patients who may suffer from multiple episodes and develop recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), but recurrence rates and associated risk factors for RAP vary significantly in the published literature.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases to identify all publications reporting AP recurrence until October 20th, 2022. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed to calculate the pooled estimates using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 36 studies met the inclusion criteria and all were used in pooled analyses. The overall rate of recurrence after first-time AP was 21% (95% CI, 18%- 24%), and pooled rates in biliary, alcoholic, idiopathic, and hypertriglyceridemia etiology patients were 12%, 30%, 25%, and 30%, respectively. After managing underlying causes post-discharge, the recurrence rate decreased (14% versus 4% for biliary, 30% versus 6% for alcoholic, and 30% versus 22% for hypertriglyceridemia AP). An increased risk of recurrence was reported in patients with a smoking history (odds ratio [OR] = 1.99), alcoholic etiology (OR = 1.72), male sex (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.63), and local complications (HR = 3.40), while biliary etiology was associated with lower recurrence rates (OR = 0.38).

CONCLUSION

More than one-fifth of AP patients experienced recurrence after discharge, with the highest recurrence rate in alcoholic and hypertriglyceridemia etiologies, and managing underlying causes post-discharge was related to decreased incidence. In addition, smoking history, alcoholic etiology, male gender, and presence of local complications were independent risks for the recurrence.

Psychometric validation of the fear of progression questionnaire-short form in acute pancreatitis patients

Introduction

Fear of progression (FoP) is associated with the quality of life and behavioral change in acute pancreatitis (AP) patients, but lack of assessment tools.

Aim

This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form in AP patients (AP-FoP-Q-SF).

Methods

Internal consistency, factorial structure, convergent validity, and criterion validity of AP-FoP-Q-SF were assessed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the cutoff value for high FoP. Associations between patient variables and FoP were evaluated using multiple logistic regression. Wilcox rank sum test was used to analyses the costs and length of hospital stay of the patients with high FoP.

Results

The two-factor structure showed a good fit. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's α = 0.771). The cutoff of 26 identified 35.3% of patients with high FoP. High FoP scores were associated with age (OR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.94-0.98), recurrence times (OR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.02-1.45) and anxiety (OR = 1.27, 95%CI: 1.16-1.40). Patients with high FoP spent more cost and time in the hospital.

Conclusions

The AP-FoP-Q-SF is a good FoP tool for AP patients in China.

Implications for practice

Clinicians can use the AP-FoP-Q-SF to assess FoP and take promotion programs to avoid worse effects.

Comparison of the imaging and clinical characteristics between Initial and Recurrent Alcoholic Acute Pancreatitis: a retrospective cross-sectional study

MATERIALS

Patients with alcoholic acute pancreatitis in our hospital were recruited from Jan 2019 to July 2022 and divided into IAAP and RAAP groups. All patients underwent Contrast-Enhanced Computerized Tomography (CECT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) after administration. Imaging manifestations, local complications, severity scores on the Modified CT/MR Severity Index (MCTSI/MMRSI), Extrapancreatic Inflammation on CT/MR (EPIC/M), clinical severity [Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE-II)], and clinical prognosis were compared between the two groups.

Results: 166 patients were recruited for this study, including 134 IAAP (male sex 94%) and 32 RAAP patients (male sex 100%). On CECT or MRI, IAAP patients were more likely to develop ascites and Acute Necrosis collection (ANC) than RAAP patients (ascites:87.3%vs56.2%; P = .01; ANC:38%vs18.7%; P < .05). MCTSI/MMRSI and EPIC/M scores were higher in IAAP than in RAAP patients(MCTSI/MMRSI:6.2vs5.2; P < .05; EPIC/M:5.4vs3.8; P < .05).Clinical severity scores (APACHE-II and BISAP), length of stay, and systemic complications [Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), respiratory failure] were higher in the IAAP group than in the RAAP group (P < .05). No mortality outcomes were reported in either group while hospitalized.Conclusions: Patients with IAAP had more severe disease than those with RAAP. These results may be helpful for differentiating care paths for IAAP and RAAP, which are essential for management and timely treatment in clinical practice.

Number of recurrences is significantly associated with the post-acute pancreatitis diabetes mellitus in a population with hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Twenty-three percent of patients are diagnosed with diabetes mellitus after the first episode of acute pancreatitis. The incidence of post-acute pancreatitis diabetes mellitus is significantly higher than that of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Some studies have concluded that the all-cause mortality and worse prognosis of diabetes after pancreatitis are higher. We predicted that number of recurrences of pancreatitis would be significantly associated with the incidences of metabolic syndrome, abdominal obesity, and post-acute pancreatitis diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

Patients admitted to our hospital for hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis from 2013-2021 were selected for a cross-sectional study. Statistical analysis methods were used to analyze the effect of recurrences on the long-term prognosis of patients with hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis.

RESULTS

In this study, 101 patients with hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis were included: 60 (59.41%) in the recurrent acute pancreatitis group and 41 (40.59%) in the only one episode of acute pancreatitis group. Among all hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis patients, approximately 61.4% were diagnosed with abdominal obesity, 33.7% of patients are diagnosed with metabolic syndrome, 34.7% of patients are diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, and 21.8% of patients are diagnosed with post-acute pancreatitis diabetes mellitus. Recurrent acute pancreatitis were independent risk factors for post-acute pancreatitis diabetes mellitus in patients with hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis (odds ratio [OR] = 3.964, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.230-12.774) and the risk of post-acute pancreatitis diabetes mellitus in patients with three or more recurrent episodes was 6.607 times higher than that in patients without recurrent episodes (OR = 6.607, 95% CI = 1.412-30.916).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence is an independent risk factor for the development of post-acute pancreatitis diabetes mellitus and is significantly associated with the number of recurrences.

Interleukin-6 is better than C-reactive protein for the prediction of infected pancreatic necrosis and mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to identify whether interleukin-6 (IL-6) is better than C-reactive protein (CRP) for the prediction of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN), and mortality.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) who were hospitalized within 48 h of onset and received serum CRP and IL-6 tests from September 2018 to September 2019 were included. Spearman's correlation was performed to assess their associations with severity. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for the prediction of SAP, organ failure, pancreatic necrosis, IPN, and mortality were estimated using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULT

Serum CRP and IL-6 levels were significantly positively correlated with the severity of AP (p < 0.05). The AUC for the prediction of SAP based on the CRP level was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.66-0.89) and that based on the IL-6 level was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.56-0.82). For the prediction of organ failure and pancreatic necrosis, CRP was more accurate than IL-6 (AUC 0.80 vs. 0.72 and 0.75 vs. 0.68, respectively). However, CRP was less accurate than IL-6 for predicting mortality and IPN (AUC 0.70 vs. 0.75 and 0.65 vs. 0.81, respectively). Systemic inflammatory response syndrome plus CRP was more accurate than systemic inflammatory response syndrome plus IL-6 (AUC 0.79 vs. 0.72) for the prediction of SAP.

CONCLUSIONS

IL-6 was more accurate than CRP for predicting mortality and IPN in patients with AP.

Radiomics and Its Applications and Progress in Pancreatitis: A Current State of the Art Review

Radiomics involves high-throughput extraction and analysis of quantitative information from medical images. Since it was proposed in 2012, there are some publications on the application of radiomics for (1) predicting recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), clinical severity of acute pancreatitis (AP), and extrapancreatic necrosis in AP; (2) differentiating mass-forming chronic pancreatitis (MFCP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), focal autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from PDAC, and functional abdominal pain (functional gastrointestinal diseases) from RAP and chronic pancreatitis (CP); and (3) identifying CP and normal pancreas, and CP risk factors and complications. In this review, we aim to systematically summarize the applications and progress of radiomics in pancreatitis and it associated situations, so as to provide reference for related research.

Three-Dimensional Radiomics Features of Magnetic Resonance T2-Weighted Imaging Combined With Clinical Characteristics to Predict the Recurrence of Acute Pancreatitis

Objective

To explore the diagnostic value of radiomics model based on magnetic resonance T2-weighted imaging for predicting the recurrence of acute pancreatitis.

Methods

We retrospectively collected 190 patients with acute pancreatitis (AP), including 122 patients with initial acute pancreatitis (IAP) and 68 patients with recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP). At the same time, the clinical characteristics of the two groups were collected. They were randomly divided into training group and validation group in the ratio of 7:3. One hundred thirty-four cases in the training group, including 86 cases of IAP and 48 cases of RAP. There were 56 cases in the validation group, including 36 cases of IAP and 20 cases of RAP. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were used for feature screening. Logistic regression was used to establish the radiomics model, clinical model and combined model for predicting AP recurrence. The predictive ability of the three models was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC). The recurrence risk in patients with AP was assessed using the nomogram.

Results

The AUCs of radiomics model in training group and validation group were 0.804 and 0.788, respectively. The AUCs of the combined model in the training group and the validation group were 0.833 and 0.799, respectively. The AUCs of the clinical model in training group and validation group were 0.677 and 0.572, respectively. The sensitivities of the radiomics model, combined model, and clinical model were 0.646, 0.691, and 0.765, respectively. The specificities of the radiomics model, combined model, and clinical model were 0.791, 0.828, and 0.590, respectively. There was no significant difference in AUC between the radiomics model and the combined model for predicting RAP (p = 0.067). The AUCs of the radiomics model and combined model were greater than those of the clinical model (p = 0.008 and p = 0.007, respectively).

Conclusions

Radiomics features based on magnetic resonance T2WI could be used as biomarkers to predict the recurrence of AP, and radiomics model and combined model can provide new directions for predicting recurrence of acute pancreatitis.

Different clinical characteristics between recurrent and non-recurrent acute pancreatitis: A retrospective cohort study from a tertiary hospital

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common digestive disorder with different clinical outcomes, some of which develop into recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP). This study aimed to explore the differences between AP and RAP.

METHODS

All patients with AP admitted to Changsha Central Hospital between January 2015 and December 2020 were included. Characteristics between RAP and non-RAP groups were compared. Independent factors associated with RAP were identified by multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

This was a retrospective study. A total of 1567 patients, including 262 patients in the RAP group and 1305 patients in the non-RAP group, were enrolled. Compared to the non-RAP group, results indicated that the RAP group was younger (P < 0.001), had a male predominance (P < 0.001), and had higher incidences of diabetes (P < 0.001) and hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) (P < 0.001). Lower incidences of cholelithiasis (P < 0.001) and acute liver injury (P < 0.001) were also noted in the RAP group. Scores of Ranson, BISAP, SOFA, and APACHE II were significantly higher in the non-RAP group (P < 0.001 for all). Three independent factors associated with RAP, including male gender (P = 0.006), diabetes (P < 0.001), and HTG (P < 0.001), were identified by multivariate logistic regression.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the non-RAP, the incidence of cholelithiasis and acute liver injury was lower in RAP. Three independent factors associated with RAP, namely male, diabetes, and HTG, were identified.

Risk Factors for Recurrent Pancreatitis After First Episode of Acute Pancreatitis

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Emodin inhibits the progression of acute pancreatitis via regulation of lncRNA TUG1 and exosomal lncRNA TUG1

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is one of the most frequent gastrointestinal diseases and has no specific treatment. It has been shown that dysfunction of pancreatic acinar cells can lead to AP progression. Emodin is a natural product, which can alleviate the symptoms of AP. However, the mechanism by which emodin regulates the function of pancreatic acinar cells remains unclear. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the mechanism by which emodin modulates the function of pancreatic acinar cells. To mimic AP in vitro, pancreatic acinar cells were cotreated with caerulein and lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Exosomes were isolated using the ExoQuick precipitation kit. Western blot analysis, Nanosight Tracking analysis and transmission electron microscopy were performed to detect the efficiency of exosome separation. Gene expression was detected by reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR. The levels of IL‑1β and TNF‑α were detected by ELISA. The data indicated that emodin significantly decreased the levels of IL‑1β and TNF‑α in the supernatant samples derived from AR42J cells cotreated with caerulein and LPS. In addition, emodin significantly promoted the proliferation of AR42J cells cotreated with caerulein and LPS, and inhibited apoptosis, while the effect of emodin was reversed by long non‑coding (lnc)RNA taurine upregulated 1 (TUG1) overexpression. The expression level of TUG1 in AR42J cells or exosomes derived from AR42J cells was significantly increased following treatment of the cells with LPS and caerulein, while this effect was notably reversed by emodin treatment. In addition, exosomes derived from caerulein and LPS cotreated AR42J cells inhibited the differentiation and anti‑inflammatory function of regulatory T cells, while treatment of the cells with emodin significantly decreased this effect. In conclusion, the data indicated that emodin inhibited the induction of inflammation in AR42J cells by regulating the expression of cellular and exosomal lncRNA. Therefore, emodin may be used as a potential agent for the treatment of AP.