1
|
Romagnolo A, Zibetti M, Lenzi M, Vighetti S, Pongmala C, Artusi CA, Montanaro E, Imbalzano G, Rizzone MG, Lopiano L. Low frequency subthalamic stimulation and event-related potentials in Parkinson disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2020; 82:123-127. [PMID: 33321451 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2020.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 12/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High frequency (130 Hz) subthalamic Deep-Brain-Stimulation (STN-DBS) optimally improves cardinal motor symptoms in Parkinson disease (PD). Low stimulation frequencies (60-80 Hz) improve axial symptoms in some patients and, according to preliminary evidences, may also have a beneficial effect on the cognitive component of motor planning. OBJECTIVE To analyze the configuration of the P300 component of cortical event-related auditory potentials (ERPs), a reliable index of attentive cognitive functions, at different stimulation frequencies in STN-DBS in PD patients. METHODS 12 PD patients underwent ERPs recordings using a standard oddball auditory paradigm with STN-DBS at 60 Hz, 80 Hz, 130 Hz, and OFF-stimulation, applied in a randomized double-blind sequence. ERPs analysis considered the peak amplitude and latency of the P300 components at midline electrode positions (Fz, Cz, Pz). RESULTS P300 latency over Cz and Pz electrodes significantly increased with STN-DBS at 130 Hz compared to OFF-stimulation. P300 latency was also significantly increased, though to a lesser degree, over Pz electrode with stimulation at 80 Hz. No significant P300 latency modifications were detected at 60 Hz stimulation compared to OFF-stimulation condition. P300 amplitude did not change significantly for any of the stimulation conditions tested. CONCLUSIONS Low frequency STN-DBS is associated with minor modifications of P300 latency compared to conventional stimulation at 130 Hz, possibly suggesting that 60 and 80 Hz may have less interference with attentive and cognitive processes in PD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Romagnolo
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Maurizio Zibetti
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Marco Lenzi
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Sergio Vighetti
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Chatkaew Pongmala
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Carlo Alberto Artusi
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Elisa Montanaro
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Gabriele Imbalzano
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Mario Giorgio Rizzone
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Leonardo Lopiano
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Buril J, Burilova P, Pokorna A, Balaz M. Use of high-density EEG in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with deep brain stimulation. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2020; 164:366-370. [DOI: 10.5507/bp.2020.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
3
|
Habelt B, Arvaneh M, Bernhardt N, Minev I. Biomarkers and neuromodulation techniques in substance use disorders. Bioelectron Med 2020; 6:4. [PMID: 32232112 PMCID: PMC7098236 DOI: 10.1186/s42234-020-0040-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Addictive disorders are a severe health concern. Conventional therapies have just moderate success and the probability of relapse after treatment remains high. Brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), have been shown to be effective in reducing subjectively rated substance craving. However, there are few objective and measurable parameters that reflect neural mechanisms of addictive disorders and relapse. Key electrophysiological features that characterize substance related changes in neural processing are Event-Related Potentials (ERP). These high temporal resolution measurements of brain activity are able to identify neurocognitive correlates of addictive behaviours. Moreover, ERP have shown utility as biomarkers to predict treatment outcome and relapse probability. A future direction for the treatment of addiction might include neural interfaces able to detect addiction-related neurophysiological parameters and deploy neuromodulation adapted to the identified pathological features in a closed-loop fashion. Such systems may go beyond electrical recording and stimulation to employ sensing and neuromodulation in the pharmacological domain as well as advanced signal analysis and machine learning algorithms. In this review, we describe the state-of-the-art in the treatment of addictive disorders with electrical brain stimulation and its effect on addiction-related neurophysiological markers. We discuss advanced signal processing approaches and multi-modal neural interfaces as building blocks in future bioelectronics systems for treatment of addictive disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Habelt
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mahnaz Arvaneh
- Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Nadine Bernhardt
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ivan Minev
- Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lio G, Thobois S, Ballanger B, Lau B, Boulinguez P. Removing deep brain stimulation artifacts from the electroencephalogram: Issues, recommendations and an open-source toolbox. Clin Neurophysiol 2018; 129:2170-2185. [PMID: 30144660 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.07.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2014] [Revised: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
A major question for deep brain stimulation (DBS) research is understanding how DBS of one target area modulates activity in different parts of the brain. EEG gives privileged access to brain dynamics, but its use with implanted patients is limited since DBS adds significant high-amplitude electrical artifacts that can completely obscure neural activity measured using EEG. Here, we systematically review and discuss the methods available for removing DBS artifacts. These include simple techniques such as oversampling, antialiasing analog filtering and digital low-pass filtering, which are necessary but typically not sufficient to fully remove DBS artifacts when each is used in isolation. We also cover more advanced methods, including techniques tracking outliers in the frequency-domain, which can be effective, but are rarely used. The reason for that is twofold: First, it requires advanced skills in signal processing since no user friendly tool for removing DBS artifacts is currently available. Second, it involves fine-tuning to avoid over-aggressive filtering. We highlight an open-source toolbox incorporating most artifact removal methods, allowing users to combine different strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Lio
- Université de Lyon, F-69622 Lyon, France; Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France; CNRS, Centre de Neuroscience Cognitive, Bron, France
| | - Stéphane Thobois
- Université de Lyon, F-69622 Lyon, France; Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France; CNRS, Centre de Neuroscience Cognitive, Bron, France; Hospices civils de Lyon, hôpital neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Bron, France
| | - Bénédicte Ballanger
- Université de Lyon, F-69622 Lyon, France; Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France; INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Brian Lau
- Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Philippe Boulinguez
- Université de Lyon, F-69622 Lyon, France; Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France; INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Electroencephalographic read-outs of the modulation of cortical network activity by deep brain stimulation. Bioelectron Med 2018; 4:2. [PMID: 32232078 PMCID: PMC7098231 DOI: 10.1186/s42234-018-0003-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Accepted: 02/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS), a reversible and adjustable treatment for neurological and psychiatric refractory disorders, consists in delivering electrical currents to neuronal populations located in subcortical structures. The targets of DBS are spatially restricted, but connect to many parts of the brain, including the cortex, which might explain the observed clinical benefits in terms of symptomatology. The DBS mechanisms of action at a large scale are however poorly understood, which has motivated several groups to recently conduct many research programs to monitor cortical responses to DBS. Here we review the knowledge gathered from the use of electroencephalography (EEG) in patients treated by DBS. We first focus on the methodology to record and process EEG signals concurrently to DBS. In the second part of the review, we address the clinical and scientific benefits brought by EEG/DBS studies so far.
Collapse
|
6
|
Event-related potentials and cognition in Parkinson’s disease: An integrative review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2016; 71:691-714. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2016] [Revised: 06/30/2016] [Accepted: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
7
|
Alhourani A, McDowell MM, Randazzo MJ, Wozny TA, Kondylis ED, Lipski WJ, Beck S, Karp JF, Ghuman AS, Richardson RM. Network effects of deep brain stimulation. J Neurophysiol 2015; 114:2105-17. [PMID: 26269552 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00275.2015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2015] [Accepted: 08/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The ability to differentially alter specific brain functions via deep brain stimulation (DBS) represents a monumental advance in clinical neuroscience, as well as within medicine as a whole. Despite the efficacy of DBS in the treatment of movement disorders, for which it is often the gold-standard therapy when medical management becomes inadequate, the mechanisms through which DBS in various brain targets produces therapeutic effects is still not well understood. This limited knowledge is a barrier to improving efficacy and reducing side effects in clinical brain stimulation. A field of study related to assessing the network effects of DBS is gradually emerging that promises to reveal aspects of the underlying pathophysiology of various brain disorders and their response to DBS that will be critical to advancing the field. This review summarizes the nascent literature related to network effects of DBS measured by cerebral blood flow and metabolic imaging, functional imaging, and electrophysiology (scalp and intracranial electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography) in order to establish a framework for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Alhourani
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael M McDowell
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael J Randazzo
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas A Wozny
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Witold J Lipski
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sarah Beck
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jordan F Karp
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Avniel S Ghuman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - R Mark Richardson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gulberti A, Hamel W, Buhmann C, Boelmans K, Zittel S, Gerloff C, Westphal M, Engel A, Schneider T, Moll C. Subthalamic deep brain stimulation improves auditory sensory gating deficit in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol 2015; 126:565-74. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.06.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2014] [Revised: 06/18/2014] [Accepted: 06/27/2014] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
9
|
Naskar S, Sood SK, Goyal V, Dhara M. RETRACTED: Mechanism(s) of deep brain stimulation and insights into cognitive outcomes in Parkinson's disease. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010; 65:1-13. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2010] [Revised: 04/12/2010] [Accepted: 04/27/2010] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
10
|
Naskar S, Sood SK, Goyal V. Effect of acute deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus on auditory event-related potentials in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2010; 16:256-60. [DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2009.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2009] [Revised: 12/08/2009] [Accepted: 12/08/2009] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|