North American survey on impact of the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown on DBS care

Outpatient Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery Is a Safe Alternative to Inpatient Admission

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is usually performed as an inpatient procedure. The COVID-19 pandemic effected a practice change at our institution with outpatient DBS performed because of limited inpatient and surgical resources. Although this alleviated use of hospital resources, the comparative safety of outpatient DBS surgery is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and incidence of early postoperative complications in patients undergoing DBS procedures in the outpatient vs inpatient setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all outpatient and inpatient DBS procedures performed by a single surgeon between January 2018 and November 2022. The main outcome measures used for comparison between the 2 groups were total complications, length of stay, rate of postoperative infection, postoperative hemorrhage rate, 30-day emergency department (ED) visits and readmissions, and IV antihypertensive requirement.

RESULTS

A total of 44 outpatient DBS surgeries were compared with 70 inpatient DBS surgeries. The outpatient DBS cohort had a shorter mean postoperative stay (4.19 vs 39.59 hours, P = .0015), lower total complication rate (2.3% vs 12.8%, P = .1457), and lower wound infection rate (0% vs 2.9%, P = .52) compared with the inpatient cohort, but the difference in complications was not statistically significant. In the 30-day follow-up period, ED visits were similar between the cohorts (6.8% vs 7.1%, P = .735), but no outpatient DBS patient required readmission, whereas all inpatient DBS patients visiting the ED were readmitted (P = .155).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that DBS can be safely performed on an outpatient basis with same-day hospital discharge and close continuous monitoring.

Excess deaths from Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 pandemic has indirect impacts on patients with chronic medical conditions, which may increase mortality risks for various non-COVID-19 causes. This study updates excess death statistics for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) up to 2022 and evaluates their demographic and spatial disparities in the USA.

METHODS

This is an ecological time-series analysis of AD and PD mortality in the USA from January 2018 to March 2022. Poisson log-linear regressions were utilised to fit the weekly death data. Excess deaths were calculated with the difference between the observed and expected deaths under a counterfactual scenario of pandemic absence.

RESULTS

From March 2020 to March 2022, we observed 41,115 and 10,328 excess deaths for AD and PD, respectively. The largest percentage increases in excess AD and PD deaths were found in the initial pandemic wave. For people aged ≥85 years, excess mortalities of AD and PD (per million persons) were 3946.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2954.3, 4892.3) and 624.3 (95% CI: 369.4, 862.5), which were about 23 and 9 times higher than those aged 55-84 years, respectively. Females had a three-time higher excess mortality of AD than males (182.6 vs. 67.7 per million persons). The non-Hispanic Black people experienced larger increases in AD or PD deaths (excess percentage: 31.8% for AD and 34.6% for PD) than the non-Hispanic White population (17.1% for AD and 14.7% for PD).

CONCLUSION

Under the continuing threats of COVID-19, efforts should be made to optimise health care capacity for patients with AD and PD.

Movement disorders in coronavirus disease 2019 times: impact on care in movement disorders and Parkinson disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to outline the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on movement disorder holistic care, particularly in the care of people with Parkinson disease (PWP).

RECENT FINDINGS

As the pandemic unfolds, a flurry of literature was published regarding the impact of COVID-19 on people with Parkinson disease including the direct impact of infection, availability of ambulatory care, loss of community-based team care, and acceptability of telemedicine.

SUMMARY

COVID-19 has impacted the care of PWP in numerous ways. Recognizing infection in PWP poses challenges. Specific long-term complications, including emerging reports of long COVID syndrome is a growing concern. Caregivers and PWP have also been impacted by COVID-19 social isolation restrictions, with radical changes to the structure of social networks and support systems globally. In a matter of weeks, the global community saw an incredible uptake in telemedicine, which brought with benefits and pitfalls. As PWP adapted to virtual platforms and the changing architecture of care delivery, the pandemic amplified many preexisting inequities amongst populations and countries, exposing a new 'digital divide'.

Treatment paradigms in Parkinson's Disease and Covid-19

People with Parkinson's Disease (PwP) may be at higher risk for complications from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) due to older age and to the multi-faceted nature of Parkinson's Disease (PD) per se, presenting with a variety of motor and non-motor symptoms. Those on advanced therapies may be particularly vulnerable. Taking the above into consideration, along with the potential multi-systemic impact of Covid-19 on affected patients and the complications of hospitalization, we are providing an evidence-based guidance to ensure a high standard of care for PwP affected by Covid-19 with varying severity of the condition. Adherence to the dopaminergic medication of PwP, without abrupt modifications in dosage and frequency, is of utmost importance, while potential interactions with newly introduced drugs should always be considered. Treating physicians should be cautious to acknowledge and timely address any potential complications, while consultation by a neurologist, preferably with special knowledge on movement disorders, is advised for patients admitted in non-neurological wards. Non-pharmacological approaches, including the patient's mobilization, falls prevention, good sleep hygiene, emotional support, and adequate nutritional and fluid intake, are essential and the role of telemedicine services should be strengthened and encouraged.

Assessment of deep brain stimulation candidacy during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned and future directions for neuropsychologists

OBJECTIVE

Neuropsychological assessment is integral to the pre-surgical deep brain stimulation (DBS) workup for patients with movement disorders. The COVID-19 pandemic quickly affected care access and shifted healthcare delivery, and neuropsychology has adapted successfully to provide tele-neuropsychological (teleNP) DBS evaluations during this time, thus permanently changing the landscape of neuropsychological practice. Method: In this paper, we discuss the lessons learned from the pandemic and we offer care management guidelines for teleNP and in-person evaluations of pre-DBS populations, with exploration of the feasibility of the different approaches for uninterrupted care access. Results: We summarize the strengths and weaknesses of these care models and we provide future directions for the state of clinical neuropsychological practice for DBS programs, with implications for broader patient populations. Conclusions: A better understanding of these dynamics will inform and educate the DBS team and community regarding the complexities of performing DBS neuropsychological evaluations during COVID-19 and beyond.