SWI/SNF Complex-Deficient Soft Tissue Neoplasms: A Pattern-Based Approach to Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis

SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study

The SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable (SWI/SNF) complex is a multimeric protein involved in transcription regulation and DNA damage repair. SWI/SNF complex abnormalities are observed in approximately 14-34 % of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). Herein, we evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of a subset of the SWI/SNF complex proteins (ARID1A, SMARCA4/BRG1, SMARCA2/BRM, and SMARCB1/INI1) within our PDAC tissue microarray to determine whether SWI/SNF loss is associated with any clinicopathologic features or patient survival in PDAC. In our cohort, 13 of 353 (3.7 %) PDACs showed deficient SWI/SNF complex expression, which included 11 (3.1 %) with ARID1A loss, 1 (0.3 %) with SMARCA4/BRG1 loss, and 1 (0.3 %) with SMARCA2/BRM loss. All cases were SMARCB1/INI1 proficient. The SWI/SNF-deficient PDACs were more frequently identified in older patients with a mean age of 71.6 years (SD = 7.78) compared to the SWI/SNF-proficient PDACs which occurred at a mean age of 65.2 years (SD = 10.95) (P = 0.013). The SWI/SNF-deficient PDACs were associated with higher histologic grade, compared to the SWI/SNF-proficient PDACs (P = 0.029). No other significant clinicopathologic differences were noted between SWI/SNF-deficient and SWI/SNF-proficient PDACs. On follow-up, no significant differences were seen for overall survival and progression-free survival between SWI/SNF-deficient and SWI/SNF-proficient PDACs (both with P > 0.05). In summary, SWI/SNF-deficient PDACs most frequently demonstrate ARID1A loss. SWI/SNF-deficient PDACs are associated with older age and higher histologic grade. No other significant associations among other clinicopathologic parameters were seen in SWI/SNF-deficient PDACs including survival.

SMARCB1/INI1-deficient epithelioid and myxoid neoplasms in paratesticular region: Expanding the clinicopathologic and molecular spectrum

SMARCB1/INI1-deficient soft tissue tumors with epithelioid and myxoid features are diverse and mainly include soft tissue myoepithelial tumor, extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, and the recently described myoepithelioma-like tumor of the vulvar region and myxoepithelioid tumor with chordoid features. Because of their overlapping features, the accurate diagnosis and classification of these tumors are often challenging. Herein, we report two unique cases of SMARCB1/INI1-deficient soft tissue neoplasm with epithelioid and myxoid features occurring in male paratesticular region. The first case was a 52-year-old man presented with an intermittent painful left paratesticular mass for 1 year. The second case was a 41-year-old man presented with a painless paratesticular mass on the right side for 3 months. Both patients underwent an orchiectomy. After 6 and 26 months of follow-up, both were alive with no evidence of recurrence or metastasis. In both cases, the tumor was relatively well-demarcated and showed monomorphic round to epithelioid cells arranged in a nested, trabecular, reticular, and corded pattern, setting in a myxohyalinized and vascularized matrix. The tumor cells showed relatively uniform round nuclei with vesicular chromatin and variably prominent nucleoli. No rhabdoid cells were identified. Mitoses numbered 3 and 2 per 10 high-power fields. Tumor necrosis or lymphovascular invasion was absent. Immunohistochemically, both tumors expressed epithelial membrane antigen (focal), calponin (focal), and CD99. SMARCB1/INI1 expression was deficient in both cases. In addition, case 1 diffusely expressed pan-cytokeratin, and case 2 diffusely expressed CD34 and synaptophysin. Molecular genetically, case 1 showed SMARCB1 homozygous deletion as detected by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), and case 2 demonstrated SMARCB1 copy number deletions by next-generation sequencing and SMARCB1 monoallelic deletion by FISH. Both cases lacked EWSR1 rearrangements by FISH. The overall clinicopathologic profiles of the two cases made it difficult to classify them as one of the established categories of SMARCB1/INI1-deficient mesenchymal tumors. Our study further expands the clinicopathologic and molecular spectrum of SMARCB1/INI1-deficient epithelioid and myxoid neoplasms and highlights the challenges to diagnose these tumors.

Immunotherapy in SMARCB1 (INI-1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma: Two case reports

BACKGROUND

SMARCB1/INI-1 deficient sinonasal carcinoma (SDSC) is a rare subset of sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma with a poor prognosis. Here, we present two case reports of SDSC patients. We also review the literature on this tumor. This is the first published report of SDSC treatment with immunotherapy.

CASE SUMMARY

Here we present two patient cases of SDSC in which initial consultation and diagnosis were complicated but SDSC was ultimately diagnosed. One patient received a traditional treatment of surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, while the other patient received additional immunotherapy; the prognoses of these two patients differed. We review previous diagnostic literature reports and SDSC treatments and provide a unique perspective on this rare type of tumor.

CONCLUSION

SDSC is a rare, diagnostically challenging carcinoma with a consistently poor prognosis, early distant metastases, and frequent recurrence. Timely diagnosis and intervention are critical for treatment, for which the standard of care is surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, though immunotherapy may be an effective new treatment for SDSC.

Targeting EZH2 in SMARCB1-deficient sarcomas: Advances and opportunities to potentiate the efficacy of EZH2 inhibitors

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare mesechymal malignancies characterized by distintive molecular, histological and clinical features. Many STSs are considered as predominatly epigenetic diseases due to underlying chromatin deregulation. Discovery of deregulated functional antagonism between the chromatin remodeling BRG1/BRM-associated (BAFs) and the histone modifying Polycomb repressor complexes (PRCs) has provided novel actionable targets. In epithelioid sarcoma (ES), extracranial, extrarenal malignant rhabdoid tumors (eMRTs) and synovial sarcoma (SS), the total or partial loss of the BAF core subunit SMARCB1, driven by different alterations, is associated with PRC2 deregulation and dependency on its enzymatic subunit, EZH2. In these SMARCB1-deficient STSs, aberrant EZH2 expression and/or activity emerged as a druggable vulnerability. Although preclinical investigation supported EZH2 targeting as a promising therapeutic option, clinical studies demonstrated a variable response to EZH2 inhibitors. Actually, whereas the clinical benefit recorded in ES patients prompted the FDA approval of the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat, the modest and sporadic responses observed in eMRT and SS patients highlighted the need to deepen mechanistic as well as pharmacological investigations to improve drug effectiveness. We summarize the current knowledge of different mechanisms driving SMARCB1 deficiency and EZH2 deregulation in ES, eMRT and SS along with preclinical and clinical studies of EZH2-targeting agents. Possible implication of the PRC2- and enzymatic-independent functions of EZH2 and of its homolog, EZH1, in the response to anti-EZH2 agents will be discussed together with combinatorial strategies under investigation to improve the efficacy of EZH2 targeting in these tumors.

[Sinonasal neoplasms: Update from the WHO 2022]

The pathology of poorly differentiated sinonasal malignancies has undergone a dynamic evolution during the last decade, resulting in a refined, mostly genetically or etiologically oriented classification of neoplasms in the historical spectrum of sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (NUT carcinoma, SWI-/SNF-deficient carcinomas, and others). Moreover, some new entities have been established, while others could be further delineated and better characterized. A highlight of the new classification is the inclusion of SWI/SNF (SMARCB1 or SMARCA4)-deficient carcinomas into a separate category. In addition, carcinomas with DEK::AFF2 fusions have been included as a provisional entity in the spectrum of nonkeratinizing squamous cell carcinoma. This review addresses the major changes in the classification of sinonasal tract neoplasms in the new WHO classification.

SWI/SNF-deficient Malignancies: Optimal Candidates for Immune-oncological Therapy?

Inactivation of different subunits of the SWItch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex has emerged as one of the most frequent genetic pathways driving a variety of neoplasms of diverse histogenesis, originating in different organs. With few exceptions, most SWI/SNF-deficient malignancies pursue a highly aggressive clinical course resulting in widespread disease dissemination either at or soon after diagnosis, ultimately causing patients' death soon after diagnosis, despite the apparently curative treatment intention. To date, no satisfactorily effective systemic chemotherapy has been established for treating these diseases. This disappointing finding underlines the urgent need for an effective systemic therapy that would enable sufficient intermediate to long-term disease control. Recently, SWI/SNF-deficiency has increasingly emerged as pivotal in cancer immunogenicity and hence a promising biomarker predicting response to immune-checkpoint inhibition therapy utilizing several recently established drugs. This review summarizes the most recent literature on this topic with emphasis on the entities that most likely represent suitable candidates for immune therapy.

SWI/SNF-deficient Sinonasal Carcinomas

The classification of poorly differentiated sinonasal carcinomas and their nonepithelial mimics has experienced tremendous developments during the last 2 decades. These recent developments paved the way for an increasingly adopted approach to a molecular-based or etiology-based refined classification of the many carcinoma variants that have been historically lumped into the sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma category. Among these new achievements, recognition of carcinoma subtypes driven by defects in the Switch/Sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex represents a major highlight. This resulted in a new definition of 4 sinonasal entities driven solely or predominantly by Switch/Sucrose nonfermentable complex deficiency: (1) SMARCB1(INI1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma (lacking gland formation and frequently displaying a non-descript basaloid, and less frequently eosinophilic/oncocytoid morphology, but no features of other definable subtypes), (2) SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal adenocarcinoma (with unequivocal glands or yolk sac-like pattern), (3) SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated (sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma-like) carcinoma (lacking glandular or squamous immunophenotypes), and (4) SMARCA4-deficient subset (~80%) of sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma. Fortunately, diagnostic loss of all these proteins can be detected by routine immunohistochemistry, so that genetic testing is not mandatory in routine practice. This review summarizes the main demographic, clinicopathological, and molecular features of these new entities.

The FUS::DDIT3 fusion oncoprotein inhibits BAF complex targeting and activity in myxoid liposarcoma

Mammalian SWI/SNF (mSWI/SNF or BAF) ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes play critical roles in governing genomic architecture and gene expression and are frequently perturbed in human cancers. Transcription factors (TFs), including fusion oncoproteins, can bind to BAF complex surfaces to direct chromatin targeting and accessibility, often activating oncogenic gene loci. Here, we demonstrate that the FUS::DDIT3 fusion oncoprotein hallmark to myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS) inhibits BAF complex-mediated remodeling of adipogenic enhancer sites via sequestration of the adipogenic TF, CEBPB, from the genome. In mesenchymal stem cells, small-molecule inhibition of BAF complex ATPase activity attenuates adipogenesis via failure of BAF-mediated DNA accessibility and gene activation at CEBPB target sites. BAF chromatin occupancy and gene expression profiles of FUS::DDIT3-expressing cell lines and primary tumors exhibit similarity to SMARCB1-deficient tumor types. These data present a mechanism by which a fusion oncoprotein generates a BAF complex loss-of-function phenotype, independent of deleterious subunit mutations.

Proceedings of the North American Society of Head and Neck Pathology, Los Angeles, CA, March 20, 2022: SWI/SNF-deficient Sinonasal Neoplasms: An Overview

The pathology of poorly differentiated sinonasal malignancies has been the subject of extensive studies during the last decade, which resulted into significant developments in the definitions and histo-/pathogenetic classification of several entities included in the historical spectrum of "sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas (SNUC)" and poorly differentiated unclassified carcinomas. In particular, genetic defects leading to inactivation of different protein subunits in the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex have continuously emerged as the major (frequently the only) genetic player driving different types of sinonasal carcinomas. The latter display distinctive demographic, phenotypic and genotypic characteristics. To date, four different SWI/SNF-driven sinonasal tumor types have been recognized: SMARCB1(INI1)-deficient carcinoma (showing frequently non-descript basaloid, and less frequently eosinophilic, oncocytoid or rhabdoid undifferentiated morphology), SMARCB1-deficient adenocarcinomas (showing variable gland formation or yolk sac-like morphology), SMARCA4-deficient carcinoma (lacking any differentiation markers and variably overlapping with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and SNUC), and lastly, SMARCA4-deficient sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma. These different tumor types display highly variable immunophenotypes with SMARCB1-deficient carcinomas showing variable squamous immunophenotype, while their SMARCA4-related counterparts lack such features altogether. While sharing same genetic defect, convincing evidence is still lacking that SMARCA4-deficient carcinoma and SMARCA4-deficient teratocracinosarcoma might belong to the spectrum of same entity. Available molecular studies revealed no additional drivers in these entities, confirming the central role of SWI/SNF deficiency as the sole driver genetic event in these aggressive malignancies. Notably, all studied cases lacked oncogenic IDH2 mutations characteristic of genuine SNUC. Identification and precise classification of these entities and separating them from SNUC, NUT carcinoma and other poorly differentiated neoplasms of epithelial melanocytic, hematolymphoid or mesenchymal origin is mandatory for appropriate prognostication and tailored therapies. Moreover, drugs targeting the SWI/SNF vulnerabilities are emerging in clinical trials.

ARID1A deficient undifferentiated spindle cell and rhabdoid sarcoma of the prostate: report of a unique case with emphasis on diagnostic implications

Background

SWItch Sucrose Non-Fermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin-remodeling complex functions collectively as a tumor suppressor and the inactivation of any of its constituent components is frequently associated with tumor initiation and/or progression. Most SWI/SNF deficient tumors share common rhabdoid morphology. ARID1A is the most frequently dysregulated SWI/SNF subunit in human cancer and inactivation of ARID1A is frequent across carcinomatous types while very rarely drives the tumorigenesis of sarcomas. Herein, we report a rare case of primary prostatic undifferentiated spindle cell sarcoma with focal rhabdoid morphology, harboring biallelic inactivation of ARID1A detected by next-generation sequencing with complete loss of ARID1A expression by immunohistochemistry.

Case presentation

The patient is a 58-year-old man who presented with dysuria and obstructive voiding symptoms for 3 month and was found to have a large, ill-defined, prostatic mass lesion with circumferential extension into the rectal wall on imaging studies. A needle biopsy showed a spindle cell undifferentiated sarcoma of the prostate and the patient was treated by chemotherapy of combined etoposide and cisplatin for 2 months. A subsequent imaging study showed that the tumor was significantly enlarged, and the patient underwent laparoscopically radical prostatectomy. Gross examination showed a disrupted, 10 × 7 × 5 cm, solid and cystic mass involving almost the entire prostate and sparing the seminal vesicle glands. Histologic examination showed that tumor was composed mainly of mildly atypical, oval to spindle-shaped cells, arranged in sheets and fascicles or herringbone-like patterns within a small amount of edematous to myxoid, vascularized stroma. Notably, groups of discohesive rhabdoid tumor cells with eccentric nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and abundant globular cytoplasm were observed. There were prominent mitotic figures, multifocal geographic necroses, and foci of lymphovascular invasion. Immunohistochemistry showed that the tumor cells were diffusely positive for TLE-1 and vimentin and focally positive for epithelial membrane antigen, AE1/3, Cam5.2, SATB2, and CD34 (all in less than 10% tumor cells). Next-generation sequencing showed biallelic inactivation mutation of ARID1A; the predicted inactivating effect of ARID1A deletion was confirmed by immunohistochemical staining. After the surgery, the patient received an alternative combined chemotherapy of doxorubicin and ifosfamide for 5 months. The patient died 9 months after initial presentation due to extensive abdominal metastases.

Conclusions

We report an ARID1A deficient undifferentiated spindle cell and rhabdoid sarcoma of the prostate, adding to the growing spectrum of SWI/SNF driven undifferentiated sarcoma. Rhabdoid cells can be a helpful morphological clue for promoting molecular and immunohistochemical analyses for deficiency of SWI/SNF subunits, in the diagnostic workup of undifferentiated neoplasms featuring epithelioid or rhabdoid morphology.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13000-022-01198-4.

SMARCA4-Deficient Undifferentiated Tumor Diagnosed on Adrenal Sampling

OBJECTIVES

SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor has distinct clinicopathologic features. We describe our experience with primary diagnosis on adrenal sampling.

METHODS

We collected six SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumors diagnosed on adrenal sampling. Immunostains for SMARCA4, SF-1, inhibin, calretinin, S-100 protein, EMA, and TTF-1 were performed. A control group of 63 primary adrenocortical tumors was also immunostained.

RESULTS

Patients included four men and two women (aged 52-77 years). Five had unilateral adrenal masses and one bilateral (range, 2.4-9.6 cm). Five had pulmonary masses, and one had a midline mediastinal mass. All cases had a monotonous epithelioid appearance and variable rhabdoid morphology. Immunophenotypically, all six cases had loss of nuclear SMARCA4 expression and no staining for SF-1, inhibin, calretinin, or S-100 protein. Variable EMA immunoreactivity was present in four of six cases and focal nuclear TTF-1 expression in one of six. All 63 adrenocortical neoplasms had retained nuclear SMARCA4 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor may present in the adrenal gland, and this series likely represents metastases from thoracic primaries. Because of the frequent absence of lineage marker expression, knowledge of the characteristic clinical presentation, the rhabdoid morphology, and the typical immunophenotype (loss of SMARCA4/BRG1) allow for appropriate distinction from adrenocortical carcinoma.

Primary adult sellar SMARCB1/INI1-deficient tumor represents a subtype of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor

Loss of function in SMARCB1/INI1 has been observed in a group of malignancies collectively defined as SMARCB1/INI1-deficient neoplasms. Primary intracranial SMARCB1/INI1-deficient tumors in adults are extremely rare. We collected eight primary adult sellar SMARCB1/INI1-deficient tumors to study their clinicopathological and (epi)genetic characteristics. We performed a comprehensive assessment of the clinical, radiological, morphological and immunohistochemical features. FISH analysis for the SMARCB1 locus and target exome sequencing for 425 cancer relevant genes were performed. Furthermore, six bona fide proximal epithelioid sarcoma (PES), fourteen atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (ATRT) in brain and five pediatric poorly differentiated chordomas (PDC) in the clivus were collected for comparative analysis of differential diagnostic maker expression and DNA methylation profile. The median age was 47.1 years, ranging from 26 to 73 years. On morphology, tumors were characterized by sheets of monomorphic larger epithelioid-like cells, in two cases with rhabdoid cells. "Stag-horn" vasculatures were observed in five cases. The loss of INI1 protein expression, co-expression of epithelial makers and mesenchymal markers were observed in all cases. CD34 expression was observed in six cases. Heterozygous deletion of SMARCB1/INI1 was confirmed using FISH in six cases. The results of target exome sequencing showed three patients harbored heterozygous point mutations in SMARCB1. The epigenetic features of the primary adult sellar SMARCB1/INI1-deficient tumors resembled the ATRT-MYC subgroup, but clustered apart from PES and PDC. Based on epigenetic characteristics, primary adult sellar SMARCB1/INI1-deficient tumors represent a subtype of ATRT with similar epigenetic characteristics of ATRT-MYC subgroup. Our findings suggest that DNA methylation profiling should be utilized for differential diagnosis for the majority of epithelioid sarcoma and (sellar) rhabdoid tumor.

[Abdominal soft tissue tumors]

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the abdomen and occur in Germany with an incidence of 10 to 15 cases per million inhabitants. Clear identification and characterization are of major importance for the prognosis and therapy of patients. Similarly, they have to be differentiated from other mesenchymal neoplasias such as leiomyomatous, neurogenic, adipocytic, and fibroblastic tumors. Additionally, the number of translocation positive neoplasias is increasing, requiring the use of adequate molecular assays. The aim of this paper is to give practical advice for their identification. Reference pathology is one possibility to support the correct diagnosis.

Methylation Drivers and Prognostic Implications in Sinonasal Poorly Differentiated Carcinomas

Simple Summary

Poorly differentiated sinonasal carcinomas (PDSNCs) are rare neoplasms that include a wide spectrum of malignancies characterized by alteration in different epigenetic mechanisms (SWI/SNF complex, IDH2, NUT). The aim of our study was to verify if the identification of specific genetic and epigenetic alterations can be useful to recognize different clinico-pathological subsets of PDSNCs to guide treatment decisions. In our cohort, 14 cases showed alterations in SWI/SNF complex or IDH2 genes, which were associated with a higher global DNA methylation level and worst prognosis. The integration of genetic and epigenetic features appears to be a good strategy to improve the clinico-pathological classification of these tumors and to recognize distinct prognostic entities that deserve tailored clinical management.

Abstract

Background: Poorly differentiated sinonasal carcinomas (PDSNCs) are rare and aggressive malignancies, which include squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC), and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC). Several epigenetic markers have been suggested to support the histopathological classification, predict prognosis, and guide therapeutic decision. Indeed, molecularly distinct subtypes of sinonasal carcinomas, including SMARCB1-INI1 or SMARCA4 deficient sinonasal carcinoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant SNUC, ARID1A mutant PDSNCs, and NUT carcinomas, have recently been proposed as separate entities. Identification of aberrant DNA methylation levels associated with these specific epigenetic driver genes could be useful for prognostic and therapeutic purpose. Methods: Histopathological review and immunohistochemical study was performed on 53 PDSNCs. Molecular analysis included mutational profile by NGS, Sanger sequencing, and MLPA analyses, and global DNA methylation profile using LINE-1 bisulfite-PCR and pyrosequencing analysis. Results: Nine SWI/SNF complex defective cases and five IDH2 p.Arg172x cases were identified. A significant correlation between INI-1 or IDH2 defects and LINE-1 hypermethylation was observed (p = 0.002 and p = 0.032, respectively), which were associated with a worse prognosis (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Genetic and epigenetic characterization of PDSNCs should be performed to identify distinct prognostic entities, which deserved a tailored clinical treatment.

Undifferentiated and dedifferentiated soft tissue neoplasms: Immunohistochemical surrogates for differential diagnosis

Undifferentiated soft tissue sarcomas (USTS) are described in the current World Health Organization Classification of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours as those showing no identifiable line of differentiation when analyzed by presently available technologies. This is a markedly heterogeneous group, and the diagnosis of USTS remains one of exclusion. USTS can be divided into four morphologic subgroups: pleomorphic, spindle cell, round cell and epithelioid undifferentiated sarcomas, with this combined group accounting for up to 20% of all soft tissue sarcomas. As molecular advances enable the stratification of emerging genetic subsets within USTS, particularly within undifferentiated round cell sarcomas, other groups, particularly the category of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPS), still remain difficult to substratify and represent heterogeneous collections of neoplasms often representing the common morphologic endpoints of a variety of malignant tumors of various (mesenchymal and non-mesenchymal) lineages. However, recent molecular developments have also enabled the identification and correct classification of many tumors from various lines of differentiation that would previously have been bracketed under 'UPS'. This includes pleomorphic neoplasms and dedifferentiated neoplasms (the latter typically manifesting with an undifferentiated pleomorphic morphology) of mesenchymal (e.g. solitary fibrous tumor and gastrointestinal stromal tumor) and non-mesenchymal (e.g. melanoma and carcinoma) origin. The precise categorization of 'pleomorphic' or 'undifferentiated' neoplasms is critical for prognostication, as, for example, dedifferentiated liposarcoma typically behaves less aggressively than other pleomorphic sarcomas, and for management, including the potential for targeted therapies based on underlying recurrent molecular features. In this review we focus on undifferentiated and dedifferentiated pleomorphic and spindle cell neoplasms, summarizing their key genetic, morphologic and immunophenotypic features in the routine diagnostic setting, and the use of immunohistochemistry in their principal differential diagnosis, and highlight new developments and entities in the group of undifferentiated and dedifferentiated soft tissue sarcomas.

Fine-needle aspiration cytopathology of soft tissue myoepithelioma: an analysis of seven cases

INTRODUCTION

Soft tissue myoepithelioma (STM), a rare mesenchymal neoplasm morphologically analogous to its more common salivary gland (SG) counterpart, is the subject of single case reports regarding its fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy. To our knowledge, ours is the first case series of STM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search was made of our pathology databases for cases diagnosed as STM. FNA biopsy smears and cell blocks were performed using standard techniques.

RESULTS

Seven cases were retrieved from 4 men and 3 women (M:F = 1.3:1; age range: 25-79 years, x = 54 years). All but 1 presented as a primary neoplasm. Six aspirates were from the extremities, and 1 from the abdominal wall. Mean tumor size was 5.7 cm. Cytologic diagnosis of STM or suspicious for STM was made in 3 cases (43%). Remaining FNA diagnoses were spindle cell neoplasm/lesion (2), spindle cell sarcoma (1), and extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (1). Three cases were composed primarily or solely of uniform spindle cells, 3 primarily of uniform epithelioid cells with plasmacytoid features, and 1 case a mixture of these 2 cell types. Myxoid/chondromyxoid stroma was relatively abundant except in the single hypocellular example. Immunohistochemical (IHC) testing performed in 71% was nonspecific, but positive with S-100 in 4 of 5, EMA in 3 of 3, calponin in 2 of 2, and keratin in 1 of 3 examples.

CONCLUSION

FNA biopsy smears of STM are remarkably similar cytomorphologically to their SG equivalent. However, STM can be misidentified principally as extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, thus requiring a relatively broad IHC panel for a specific diagnosis.

Histologic and genomic features of breast cancers with alterations affecting the SWI/SNF (SMARC) genes

The SWI/SNF family of proteins is a multisubunit ATPase complex frequently altered in human cancer. Inactivating mutations in SWI/SNF-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin (SMARCs) underpin a subset of tumors such as the malignant rhabdoid tumor and small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type. Here, we investigated the genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of breast cancers harboring somatic genetic alterations affecting genes of the SMARC family. We analyzed a series of 6026 primary and metastatic breast cancers subjected to targeted-capture sequencing. SMARC core subunit (SMARCA4, SMARCB1, and SMARCA2) alterations were identified in <1% of all breast cancers, consisting of 27 primary and 30 recurrent/metastatic tumors. The majority of SMARC alterations were monoallelic mutations (47/57, 82%) and thus categorized into two groups: Class 1 alterations consisting of potentially pathogenic mutations and rearrangements and Class 2 alterations consisting of missense mutations and small in-frame deletions of unknown significance. Biallelic events in a SMARC gene were present in a minority of cases (10/57, 18%). Histologic patterns in the form of rhabdoid, composite rhabdoid, sarcomatoid or anaplastic features were observed in a subset of Class 1 primary and metastatic tumors (7/57, 12%). SMARC protein was preserved in nearly all tumors analyzed with immunohistochemistry (26/30, 87%). Four Class 1 tumors demonstrated altered SMARC protein expression in the form of loss (1/30, 3%) or mosaic pattern (3/30, 10%). Complete loss of SMARCA2 (BRM) was observed in a sole tumor with composite rhabdoid morphology, and biallelic hits in the SMARCA2 gene. The genomic landscape of both primary Class 1 and 2 breast cancers did not reveal any characteristic findings. In summary, SMARC alterations likely contribute to the biology of a rare subset of breast cancers in the form of biallelic or pathogenic alterations in SMARC, as evidenced by SMARC-deficient phenotype or altered expression of SMARC protein.

Cytomorphologic Spectrum of SMARCB1-Deficient Soft Tissue Neoplasms

OBJECTIVES

The SWI/SNF complex core subunit SMARCB1 is inactivated in a variety of neoplasms that share characteristic "rhabdoid" cytomorphology. The aim of this study was to evaluate SMARCB1-deficient soft tissue neoplasms on cytology to identify diagnostic clues.

METHODS

Eleven SMARCB1-deficient tumors, including six epithelioid sarcomas, three malignant rhabdoid tumors, one epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), and one poorly differentiated chordoma with fine-needle aspiration (FNA), serous effusion, or touch prep (TP) from two institutions, were included. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed in two cases.

RESULTS

Evaluation of FNA (n = 4), effusion (n = 4), and TP (n = 3) in nine adult and two pediatric patients demonstrated cellular samples (n = 11), epithelioid cells with rhabdoid morphology (n = 9), eccentrically located nuclei with prominent nucleoli (n = 7), and cytoplasmic bodies (n = 4); two patients were diagnosed on FNA with cell block. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) demonstrated SMARCB1 loss in all cases and keratin and/or EMA expression in all but the epithelioid MPNST; NGS identified SMARCB1 inactivation in both cases.

CONCLUSIONS

SMARCB1-deficient soft tissue neoplasms comprise a variety of tumors with epithelioid morphology and frequent expression of keratin and/or EMA. Recognition of characteristic rhabdoid morphology on cytology can prompt IHC and/or NGS testing for SMARCB1 deficiency and help establish the diagnosis.

Primary cutaneous SMARCB1-deficient carcinoma

BACKGROUND

SMARCB1-deficient malignancies can arise in various sites. We describe a novel primary SMARCB1-deficient carcinoma of skin (SDCS) and characterize SMARCB1 mutations in non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC).

METHODS

Cases underwent immunophenotyping and targeted exome sequencing (MSK-IMPACT) assay interrogating somatic mutations in 468 cancer-related genes. The MSK-IMPACT database from 2014 to 2020 encompassing 55, 000 cases was searched for NMSC with SMARCB1 mutations.

RESULTS

SDCS arose on the scalp of an 18-year-old woman showing homozygous SMARCB1 deletion with a LATS2 G963E variant. Another case arose on the temple of a 76-year-old man harboring a SMARCB1 W206* mutation associated with loss of heterozygosity (LOH), 59 concurrent mutations, and a UV mutation signature (UV-MS). Both tumors exhibited INI1 loss, positive CK5/6, p40, p63, and claudin-4 with negative CD34. Of 378 NMSC cases, including 370 carcinomas, 7 SMARCB1-mutated tumors were identified: 3 squamous cell, 3 Merkel cell, and one basal cell carcinoma. Six showed UV-MS. Five INI1-interrogated cases retained protein expression suggesting they were SMARCB1-proficient.

CONCLUSIONS

SDCS can be clinically aggressive, harbor SMARCB1 homozygous deletions or truncating SMARCB1 mutations associated with LOH, and can occur with or without UV-MS. Overall, SMARCB1 mutations in NMSC are rare with most being of undetermined significance and associated with retained INI1 and UV-MS.

SWI/SNF-deficient head and neck neoplasms: An overview

With wide-spread use of next generation sequencing tools in surgical pathology, a variety of neoplasms have been increasingly recognized to be associated with specific recurrent defining genetic abnormalities. This has led to recognition of new genetically defined entities and refinements of preexisting heterogeneous neoplastic categories. Among these, neoplasms associated with inactivating mutations involving different subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex have received special attention. In the head and neck area, SMARCB1 (INI1) and SMARCA4 (BRG1) are the main two SWI/SNF components responsible for several recently described highly aggressive undifferentiated malignancies with predilection for the soft tissue of the neck (SMARCB1-deficient malignant rhabdoid tumors in children and rare epithelioid sarcoma cases in adults) and the sinonasal tract (SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma including a small subset of adenocarcinomas, SMARCA4-deficient sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma and SMARCA4-deficient sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma). Molecular studies confirmed paucity of additional genetic abnormalities in these diseases underlining the central role of SWI/SNF deficiency as the primary and frequently sole genetic driver of these lethal diseases. Initiation of clinical trials using drugs that target the SWI/SNF collapse encourages recognition and correct classification of these morphologically frequently overlapping malignancies and underpins the role of SWI/SNF immunohistochemistry as emerging powerful adjunct tool in surgical pathology of the head and neck.

Current recommendations for clinical surveillance and genetic testing in rhabdoid tumor predisposition: a report from the SIOPE Host Genome Working Group

The rhabdoid tumor (RT) predisposition syndromes 1 and 2 (RTPS1 and 2) are rare genetic conditions rendering young children vulnerable to an increased risk of RT, malignant neoplasms affecting the kidney, miscellaneous soft-part tissues, the liver and the central nervous system (Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumors, ATRT). Both, RTPS1&2 are due to pathogenic variants (PV) in genes encoding constituents of the BAF chromatin remodeling complex, i.e. SMARCB1 (RTPS1) and SMARCA4 (RTPS2). In contrast to other genetic disorders related to PVs in SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 such as Coffin-Siris Syndrome, RTPS1&2 are characterized by a predominance of truncating PVs, terminating transcription thus explaining a specific cancer risk. The penetrance of RTPS1 early in life is high and associated with a poor survival. However, few unaffected carriers may be encountered. Beyond RT, the tumor spectrum may be larger than initially suspected, and cancer surveillance offered to unaffected carriers (siblings or parents) and long-term survivors of RT is still a matter of discussion. RTPS2 exposes female carriers to an ill-defined risk of small cell carcinoma of the ovaries, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT), which may appear in prepubertal females. RT surveillance protocols for these rare families have not been established. To address unresolved issues in the care of individuals with RTPS and to propose appropriate surveillance guidelines in childhood, the SIOPe Host Genome working group invited pediatric oncologists and geneticists to contribute to an expert meeting. The current manuscript summarizes conclusions of the panel discussion, including consented statements as well as non-evidence-based proposals for validation in the future.

Dedifferentiated and undifferentiated neoplasms: A conceptual approach

This review provides a conceptual approach to dedifferentiation across a variety of tumor types, with particular attention to genetic events that tie together morphologically disparate areas of these neoplasms. First, working definitions of the terms differentiated, undifferentiated, and dedifferentiated are developed. Then, specific examples of tumors with a particular propensity for undergoing dedifferentiation are highlighted, with emphasis on both immunohistochemical studies and molecular lesions that enable surgical pathologists to establish diagnostic clarity in morphologically vexing situations. Throughout this review, the historical arc of the literature is followed, and therefore the discussion of specific tumor types begins with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma, the neoplasm that inspired the terminology regarding dedifferentiation that remains in use today. Selected other sarcomas with well-established pathways of dedifferentiation are subsequently discussed, followed by descriptions of this process in subtypes of carcinoma and melanoma.

The Novel Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor, OBP-801, Induces Apoptosis in Rhabdoid Tumors by Releasing the Silencing of NOXA

Rhabdoid tumor is an aggressive, early childhood tumor. Biallelic inactivation of the SWI/SNF-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily B member 1 (SMARCB1)/integrase interactor 1 (INI1) gene is the only common genetic feature in rhabdoid tumors. Loss of SMARCB1 function results in downregulation of several tumor suppressor genes including p16, p21, and NOXA The novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, OBP-801, induces p21 and has shown efficacy against various cancers. In our study, OBP-801 strongly inhibited the cell growth of all rhabdoid tumor cell lines in WST-8 assay. However, Western blotting and cell-cycle analysis revealed that OBP-801 did not activate the P21-RB pathway in some cell lines. p21 knockout indicated that p21 did not dominate the OBP-801 antitumor effect in rhabdoid tumor cell lines. We discovered that OBP-801 induced NOXA expression and caspase-dependent apoptosis in rhabdoid tumor cell lines independent of TP53. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay showed that OBP-801 acetylated histone proteins and recruited RNA polymerase II to the transcription start site (TSS) of the NOXA promotor. Moreover, OBP-801 recruited BRG1 and BAF155, which are members of the SWI/SNF complex, to the TSS of the NOXA promotor. These results suggest that OBP-801 epigenetically releases the silencing of NOXA and induces apoptosis in rhabdoid tumors. OBP-801 strongly inhibited tumor growth in human rhabdoid tumor xenograft mouse models in vivo Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling and cleaved caspase-3 were stained in tumors treated with OBP-801. In conclusion, OBP-801 induces apoptosis in rhabdoid tumor cells by epigenetically releasing the silencing of NOXA, which is a key mediator of rhabdoid tumor apoptosis. The epigenetic approach for NOXA silencing with OBP-801 is promising for rhabdoid tumor treatment.

Review of SMARCA4 (BRG1)-deficient carcinomas following a malignant pleural effusion specimen confounded by reduced claudin-4 expression

SMARCA4-deficient neoplasms are recently characterized high-grade malignancies associated with a poor prognosis. The SMARCA4 gene encodes BRG1, which is part of the SWI/SNF complex. SMARCA4-deficient neoplasms have an undifferentiated, often rhabdoid morphology, and demonstrate loss of BRG1 nuclear expression on immunohistochemistry. These neoplasms have become increasingly recognized and diagnosed in tissue specimens, but their features in cytologic specimens are poorly defined in the literature. The review is introduced by a diagnostically challenging case of a SMARCA4-deficient carcinoma involving a pleural fluid specimen in which the carcinoma cells demonstrated greatly reduced claudin-4 expression in the setting of strong, diffuse BerEP4 expression. Most of the malignant cells also demonstrated positive cytoplasmic staining for PAS and all were PAS-diastase negative, suggesting that the cytoplasm contained glycogen granules.

Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma: combining cytopathology with molecular testing to achieve diagnostic accuracy

INTRODUCTION

Advances in the genetics of soft tissue neoplasia have allowed for the diagnostic recognition of specific tumor types from small biopsy specimens, including those procured using the fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy technique. Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC) is a malignant mesenchymal neoplasm characterized by NR4A3 and, less specifically, by EWSR1 gene rearrangements. A series of EMC cytologic specimens was examined to demonstrate the diagnostic value of incorporating fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing in cytologic cases of suspected EMC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search was made of our cytopathology and surgical pathology databases for cases diagnosed as EMC. FNA biopsy cytology, exfoliative cytology, imprint cytology, and FISH analysis were performed and examined using standard techniques.

RESULTS

A total of 16 cases of EMC were retrieved from 15 patients (male/female ratio, 2.8:1; mean age, 62 years). Of the 15 patients, 10 were new patients with primary tumors, 2 had locally recurrent tumors, and 4 had metastases. The sites included the extremities in 10 cases, the trunk in 4, serous effusion in 1, and a mediastinal lymph node in 1 case. The specific cytologic diagnoses were EMC (14 cases; 88%), suspicious for EMC (n = 1), and malignant cells (n = 1). All cases for which FISH testing was successfully used were specifically recognized as EMC. Aspirates and imprint smears consisted of uniformly rounded cells set in an opaque myxoid/chondromyxoid stroma (less abundant and more diaphanous in the effusion sample), sometimes arranged in short anastomosing cords. FNA of 1 case of an EMC cellular variant mimicked a malignant small rounded cell tumor.

CONCLUSION

EMC can be added to the growing list of soft tissue neoplasms that are specifically recognizable using cytopathology, coupled with judicious application of ancillary molecular testing.

SMARCA4-deficient Sinonasal Carcinoma: A Series of 10 Cases Expanding the Genetic Spectrum of SWI/SNF-driven Sinonasal Malignancies

The molecular pathogenesis of poorly differentiated sinonasal carcinoma received significant attention in recent years. As a consequence, several unclassified carcinomas in the morphologic spectrum of sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma have been reclassified as distinctive genetically defined variants or entities. Among the latter are NUT-rearranged carcinoma and SMARCB1-deficient carcinomas. In this study, we further characterize a rare variant of sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma-like tumors characterized by inactivation of the SWItch/Sucrose Nonfermentable chromatin remodeler SMARCA4 (BRG1) detectable by immunohistochemistry. Patients were 7 males and 3 females aged 20 to 67 years (median, 44). Tumors originated in the nasal cavity (6), nose and sinuses (2), or at unspecified site (2). Six tumors were initially misdiagnosed as small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) or large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). Histologically, the tumors were composed of small basaloid (3 cases) or large epithelioid (7) cells disposed into nests and solid sheets with extensive areas of necrosis. No glands or other differentiating features were noted. Abortive rosettes were seen in 1 case. Immunohistochemistry showed consistent expression of pankeratin and absence of CK5, p63, p16, and NUT in all tumors tested. Other tested markers were variably positive: CK7 (2/6), synaptophysin (9/10; mostly focal and weak), chromogranin-A (4/10; focal), and CD56 (3/5; focal). All tumors showed total loss of SMARCA4 and retained expression of SMARCB1/INI1. Co-loss of SMARCA2 was seen in 1 of 8 cases. Limited data were available on treatment and follow-up. Two patients received surgery (1 also radiotherapy) and 3 received chemotherapy. Metastases (cervical nodes, liver, bone, and lung/mediastinal) were detected in 3 patients; 2 were alive under palliative chemotherapy at 8 and 9 months while 1 died of progressive lung disease at 7 months. Three patients (1 with brain invasion) died soon after diagnosis (1 to 3 mo). In total, 4 of 6 patients (66%) with follow-up died of disease (median, 3 mo). This series characterizes SMARCA4-deficient sinonasal carcinoma as a genetically distinct aggressive entity in the spectrum of undifferentiated sinonasal carcinomas. These variants add to the spectrum of SWItch/Sucrose Nonfermentable-deficient sinonasal carcinomas, at the same time expanding the topographic distribution of SMARCA4-related malignancies.

SWI/SNF complex-deficient soft tissue neoplasms: An update

The SWItch Sucrose Non-Fermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex is a large multi-subunit protein assembly that orchestrates chromatin compaction and accessibility for gene transcription in an ATP-dependent manner. As a key epigenetic regulator, the SWI/SNF complex coordinates gene expression, cell proliferation and differentiation, and its biologic functions, in part, antagonize the polycomb repressive complex 2. The mammalian SWI/SNF complex consists of 15 subunits encoded by 29 genes, some of which are recurrently mutated in human cancers, in the germline or sporadic setting. Most SWI/SNF-deficient tumors share common "rhabdoid" cytomorphology. SMARCB1 (INI1) is the subunit most frequently inactivated in soft tissue neoplasms. Specifically, SMARCB1 deficiency is observed as the genetic hallmark in virtually all malignant rhabdoid tumors, and most cases of epithelioid sarcoma and poorly differentiated chordoma. In addition, subsets of myoepithelial carcinoma (10-40%), extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (20%), epithelioid schwannoma (40%), and epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (70%) demonstrate SMARCB1 loss. The gene encoding the SS18 subunit is involved in the SS18-SSX rearrangement, which is pathognomonic of synovial sarcoma and indirectly inactivates SMARCB1. Finally, undifferentiated SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomas are defined by SMARCA4 subunit inactivation, leading to SMARCA4 and SMARCA2 loss. Rarely, inactivation of alternate but biologically equivalent key regulators can substitute for canonical subunit deficiency, such as SMARCA4 inactivation in cases of SMARCB1-retained epithelioid sarcoma. This review briefly highlights SWI/SNF complex biologic functions and its roles in human cancer and provides a detailed update on recent advances in soft tissue neoplasms with canonical SWI/SNF complex deficiency, correlating morphologic, genomic, and immunohistochemical findings.

Epithelioid Cutaneous Mesenchymal Neoplasms: A Practical Diagnostic Approach

Epithelioid cells are rounded or polygonal cells with abundant eosinophilic or clear cytoplasm and ovoid to round nuclei, superficially resembling epithelial cells. Cutaneous mesenchymal neoplasms composed predominantly or exclusively of epithelioid cells are relatively uncommon and can cause considerable diagnostic difficulties due to overlapping histologic features among heterogeneous groups of tumors. Familiarity with practical diagnostic approaches and recognition of key histopathologic features are important for correct diagnosis and management. This review summarizes the histologic features of epithelioid cutaneous mesenchymal neoplasms and discusses their differential diagnoses from malignant melanomas and carcinomas.

The SWI/SNF complex in cancer - biology, biomarkers and therapy

Cancer genome-sequencing studies have revealed a remarkably high prevalence of mutations in genes encoding subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodelling complexes, with nearly 25% of all cancers harbouring aberrations in one or more of these genes. A role for such aberrations in tumorigenesis is evidenced by cancer predisposition in both carriers of germline loss-of-function mutations and genetically engineered mouse models with inactivation of any of several SWI/SNF subunits. Whereas many of the most frequently mutated oncogenes and tumour-suppressor genes have been studied for several decades, the cancer-promoting role of mutations in SWI/SNF genes has been recognized only more recently, and thus comparatively less is known about these alterations. Consequently, increasing research interest is being focused on understanding the prognostic and, in particular, the potential therapeutic implications of mutations in genes encoding SWI/SNF subunits. Herein, we review the burgeoning data on the mechanisms by which mutations affecting SWI/SNF complexes promote cancer and describe promising emerging opportunities for targeted therapy, including immunotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors, presented by these mutations. We also highlight ongoing clinical trials open specifically to patients with cancers harbouring mutations in certain SWI/SNF genes.

Switch/sucrose nonfermenting nucleosome complex-deficient colorectal carcinomas have distinct clinicopathologic features

The switch/sucrose nonfermenting (SWI/SNF) nucleosome complex consists of several proteins that are involved in cellular proliferation and tumor suppression. The aim of this study was to correlate immunohistochemical expression of four SWI/SNF complex subunits, SMARCA2, SMARCB1, SMARCA4, and ARID1A, with clinicopathologic and molecular features and patient survival in 338 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma using a tissue microarray approach. Twenty-three (7%) colorectal adenocarcinomas demonstrated deficient SWI/SNF expression: 7 had SMARCA2 deficiency, 12 had ARID1A deficiency, and 4 had both SMARCA2 and ARID1A deficiency. No cases were SMARCB1 or SMARCA4 deficient. Twelve (52%) SWI/SNF complex-deficient tumors demonstrated mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (p = 0.02), 6 (26%) showed medullary differentiation (p = 0.001), and 9 were negative for CDX2 expression (p < 0.001). Among the MMR-deficient SWI/SNF complex-deficient tumors, 8 were sporadic MLH1 deficient, and 4 were seen in patients with Lynch syndrome. Compared with tumors with ARID1A deficiency alone, SMARCA2-deficient tumors were less likely to exhibit MMR deficiency (27% vs. 75%, p = 0.04), medullary differentiation (0% vs. 50%, p = 0.01), and mucinous differentiation (0% vs. 42%, p = 0.04). Conventional gland-forming histology was more often identified in SMARCA2-deficient tumors (11/11, 100%) than in tumors with ARID1A deficiency alone (4/12, 33%) (p = 0.001). There was no difference in KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, stage, disease-specific survival, or disease-free survival for patients stratified by SWI/SNF expression (all with p > 0.05). In conclusion, SMARCA2-deficient and ARID1A-deficient colorectal carcinomas had distinctly different clinicopathologic features, with ARID1A-deficient tumors exhibiting medullary and mucinous differentiation and MMR deficiency and SMARCA2-deficient tumors demonstrating conventional gland-forming histologic growth with less frequent MMR deficiency.

Cytopathology of classic type epithelioid sarcoma: a series of 20 cases and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

As a rare soft tissue malignancy, epithelioid sarcoma (EpS) is infrequently subjected to cytopathologic analysis. With the exception of a few series, the cytology literature regarding EpS is largely limited to single case reports. Our purpose was to evaluate our experience with EpS, and review the literature regarding its cytopathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search was made of our cytopathology and surgical pathology databases for cases diagnosed as EpS. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy smears and imprint smears were performed and examined using standard technique. Effusion samples were processed using liquid-based slides.

RESULTS

Twenty cases of EpS were retrieved from 10 patients (M:F 1:1; mean age = 36 years). One patient had 5, 1 patient had 3, and 3 patients had 2 separate specimens. All patients had prior or subsequent tissue confirmation of EpS; all were of the classic/distal type. Seven were new patient cases, 7 were locally recurrent, and 6 were metastases. Sites included lower extremity (8 cases), upper extremity (4), trunk (4), serous effusion (2), scalp (1), and mediastinum (1). Specific cytologic diagnosis were EpS (13 cases), sarcoma not otherwise specified (5), and malignant neoplasm (2). All cases where cell-block SMARCB-1 staining was used were specifically recognized as EpS. Cytomorphology was composed primarily of epithelioid/plasmacytoid cells having eccentrically positioned nuclei, moderate cytoplasm, and variable nuclear pleomorphism.

CONCLUSION

The cytopathology of EpS is somewhat variable, morphologically non-specific, and mimics that of other neoplasms with epithelioid features. Ancillary immunostaining is necessary for a specific diagnosis in newly encountered patients.

What is new in epithelioid soft tissue tumors?

Epithelioid cell features mimicking carcinomas characterize a variety of histogenetically, phenotypically, and molecularly distinct subsets of mesenchymal neoplasms. In a pathogenetic sense, epithelioid soft tissue tumors basically fall into three main genetic categories: (1) switch/sucrose non-fermenting (SWI/SNF) complex-deficient tumors (with epithelioid sarcoma as their prototype); (2) epithelioid neoplasms driven by specific rare gene fusions (such as sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma with EWSR1 fusions and GLI1-related malignant epithelioid soft tissue neoplasms); and (3) a heterogeneous group encompassing epithelioid variants of diverse other entities. Notably, lesions in the first and third groups may display variable, occasionally prominent, rhabdoid cell morphology, thus further complicating their differential diagnosis. This review summarizes the main clinicopathological, phenotypic, and genotypic features of these diseases and discusses their pertinent differential diagnostic considerations.

[Myxoid soft tissue tumours : An algorithm for differential diagnosis]

Soft tissue neoplasms with myxoid features are collectively not uncommon. Their often complex differential diagnosis makes them significantly over-represented among consultation cases. This applies not only to sarcomas but in particular to benign lesions as well. Generally, myxoid soft tissue lesions are divided into two major groups: (1) myxoid lesions by definition (which can however rarely be non-myxoid) and (2) rare myxoid variants of otherwise non-myxoid entities.Four major diagnostic challenges are responsible for the complexity of myxoid soft tissue neoplasms: (1) Diagnosis of malignancy in many cases is not based on conventional malignancy criteria but is defined by the entity itself, making under-diagnosis of malignancy likely in entities such as low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma. (2) On the other hand, harmless myxoid lesions with features of high proliferation, e.g. nodular and proliferative fasciitis, tend to be over-diagnosed as malignant by the unworried. (3) The necessity to assess not only cellular morphology/differentiation, but also the stromal, vascular and architectural characteristics adds to the complexity of the differential diagnostic algorithm. (4) Last but not least, recognition of unexpected myxoid variants of non-myxoid entities is basically impossible if focal conventional areas are absent, underlining the need for high suspicion index and sufficient sampling.This review illuminates the various aspects related to the differential diagnostic workup of these challenging entities.

A BAFfling liver aspirate: Metastatic high grade SMARCA4 deficient undifferentiated gastroesophageal junction carcinoma masquerading as a hematolymphoid malignancy

Undifferentiated malignant SMARCA4-deficient neoplasms are rare, recently characterized, high grade, potentially lethal malignancies. Such tumors are characterized by the loss of BRG1 encoded by SMARCA4, a key component of the Switch/Sucrose Non-Fermenting (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex. As this complex, also referred as BAF (BRG1/BRM associated factors) complex, is involved in the epigenetic control of hundreds of genes, including those involved in lineage-specific differentiation, BAF-deficient tumors, show minimal or no differentiation and are difficult to classify. Their fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytologic features are still poorly defined. Here, we describe a 70-year-old man who presented with thickening of the wall of the distal esophagus and stomach and multiple liver and lung lesions. Liver FNA showed relatively uniform dispersed malignant cells with high nucleus: cytoplasm ratio, scant microvacuolated cytoplasm, eccentric nuclei and prominent nucleoli. Mitoses, necrotic debris, nuclear streak artifact, "ghost cells" and focal rhabdoid cytoplasmic inclusions were also present. The liver core biopsy and GI biopsies demonstrated sinusoidal and respectively submucosal involvement by a high grade undifferentiated malignant neoplasm. The tumor cells were negative for all applied markers on immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry, and only showed CD138 and weak PAX5 staining. After an initial diagnosis of hematolymphoid neoplasm, additional stains showed intact INI1 protein and loss of BRG1 protein immunoexpression, establishing the accurate diagnosis. This case highlights the difficulties and potential pitfalls encountered in the FNA diagnosis of BAF-deficient tumors, the accurate diagnosis of which is important due to their lack of response to conventional therapy and potential response to targeted therapy.