Communication practices of healthcare professionals when caring for overweight/obese pregnant women: A scoping review

What it Means to Call Your Patient Obese: The Impact of Communicating Weight Stigma in Patient-Provider Conversations

Perceived weight stigma has been shown to have serious consequences in healthcare, including poorer mental health, physical health, and other social injustices for overweight individuals. However, the full impact of stigmatized language use (like "obese") in patient-provider interactions remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted an online experiment (N = 501) in the US to examine the effects of stigmatized language use in conversations with healthcare providers, including on patients' perceptions of themselves as well as their healthcare experience. Results show that stigmatized conversation about weight initiated by healthcare providers results in higher weight self-stigma among patients, failing to increase their desire to lose weight (likely a goal of providers via these interactions). Additionally, patients exposed to stigmatized conversation experience decreased patient-centered communication, lower trust in healthcare providers, decreased quality of healthcare, and decreased satisfaction with their healthcare providers. Furthermore, this study found some support for the moderating effect of narrative transportation and perceived body size on some of the outcomes. Hence, in healthcare practice, our results suggest that healthcare providers should reduce their use of stigmatized language when discussing weight with their patients as a way to improve weight self-stigma among patients as well as patient-centered communication and related outcomes.

How experiences of weight stigma impact higher-weight women during their maternity care: A meta-ethnography

AIM

The aim of this review was to explore the experiences of pregnant women and birthing people with higher weight bodies, to understand the extent to which weight stigma impacted their maternity care.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of seven databases (CINAHL plus, Medline, Social Sciences Full Text [SSFT], International Bibliography of Social Sciences [IBSS], PsychINFO, Maternity and Infant Care [MIC], NIHR Journals Library, EThOS) using the Setting, Perspective, Intervention, Comparison, Evaluation (SPICE) framework search strategy and pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included studies underwent a critical appraisal and data richness assessment. We undertook thematic analysis after coding first- and second-order constructs and developed a synthesis from the themes.

FINDINGS

Thirty-eight papers, including six doctoral theses and one book chapter, met the inclusion criteria. Five themes were identified through thematic analysis, and the synthesis demonstrated that women of a higher weight experience shame, harmful attitudes and preconceptions from healthcare professionals regularly and repeatedly while receiving maternity care. This can be alleviated by individualised supportive care from a healthcare professional.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

Negative interactions with maternity care professionals are central to the experience of weight stigma, leading to a sense of 'shame', with pervasive feelings of humiliation, judgement and blame. Current guidance does not acknowledge the stigmatising effects of weight related conversations, additional interventions and restrictions on women's birthplace choices. Adopting a shame-sensitive lens within a culturally safe approach to maternity care could transform support for women.

When midwives ask permission to discuss weight with pregnant women with high body weight: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

In 2021, 15% of pregnant women in Denmark had a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 or more, which is associated with complications for both mothers and children. Healthcare professionals often feel insecure when discussing weight with pregnant women with high body weight, and people with high body weight are exposed to stigmatisation. To counter this, different tools have been developed to support respectful weight-related conversations, often recommending asking permission to talk about weight. This study explored the experiences of both pregnant women living with a BMI equally or above 30 kg/m2 and midwives when asking for permission to discuss weight during the initial midwife consultation.

METHODS

We observed nine midwifery consultations and, by way of purposive sampling, interviewed six pregnant women with high body weight, while nine midwives participated in two focus group interviews. A hermeneutic-phenomenological approach by Max van Manen was applied for the analysis.

RESULTS

We identified three themes in this study. "Addressing weight triggers risk and ambivalence", which explores the lived experiences of pregnant women, their personal history with their body weight and midwives' hesitancy to initiate weight-related conversations with pregnant women who have a high body weight. "Asking for permission - for whose sake?" highlights the experiences of asking permission among midwives and that pregnant women with a high body weight did not perceive the question as an opportunity to decrease weight-related conversations. "Weight conversation - a cue to feel wrong and guilty or to feel recognised as an individual?" emphasising that trust and shared decision-making are crucial factors for a relevant weight-related conversation but also that the conversation might trigger feelings such as guilt and self-doubt.

CONCLUSION

Pregnant women with high body weight had a long history with their body weight that affected all aspects of their lifeworld and influenced weight-related conversations in the midwifery consultation. Some midwives hesitated to address weight, but seeking permission eased this challenge. Despite the midwife asking for permission, some of the pregnant women felt uneasy during the conversation, leaving them with a feeling of self-doubt. Relevant conversations occurred when women engaged in decision-making and trusted the midwife.

Impact of telehealth on patient-provider communication in prenatal care for pregnant women from underserved settings

INTRODUCTION

Telehealth has emerged as a promising supplementary modality in prenatal care. However, its impact on patient-provider communication (PPC), especially among pregnant women from underserved settings, requires comprehensive evaluation. This study examined the factors associated with the quality of patient-provider communication during the COVID-19 pandemic among pregnant telehealth users and non-users.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional study design, 242 women were surveyed (response rate = 23%) regarding their experience with telehealth, quality of PPC, and experiences of discrimination during prenatal care. Multiple regression models were used to identify the factors associated with the quality of PPC during the COVID-19 pandemic. A sub-group analysis explored the factors associated with the quality of PPC separately among telehealth users and non-users.

RESULTS

The majority of the participants were on Medicaid (95%) and self-identified as Black/African American (57.3%). Regression analyses revealed a negative relationship between telehealth use during pregnancy and the quality of PPC (β = -1.13, P = 0.002). Irrespective of the telehealth use, the experience of discrimination was associated with poor quality of PPC among users (β = -3.47, P = .02) and non-users (β = -.78, P = .03), while adjusting for sociodemographic factors and social support during pregnancy.

DISCUSSION

While telehealth offers advantages like convenience, increased accessibility, and continuity of care, challenges in establishing effective PPC in virtual settings have emerged that emphasize the necessity for comprehensive provider training extending beyond technical competencies. The persistent issue of perceived discrimination, impacting PPC across both groups, underscores the necessity to rethink existing strategies of mandatory training to increase providers' knowledge.

Navigating weight, risk and lifestyle conversations in maternity care: a qualitative study among pregnant women with obesity

BACKGROUND

Pregnant women with obesity face heightened focus on weight during pregnancy due to greater risk of medical complications. Closer follow-up in maternety care may contribute to reduce risk and promote health in these women. The aim of this study was to gain a deeper insight in how pregnant women with obesity experience encounters with healthcare providers in maternity care. How is the received maternity care affected by their weight, and how do they describe the way healthcare providers express attitudes towards obesity in pregnancy?

METHODS

We conducted in-depth interviews with 14 women in Trøndelag county in Norway with pre-pregnancy BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m2, between 3 and 12 months postpartum. The study sample was strategic regarding age, relationship status, education level, obesity class, and parity. Themes were developed using reflexive thematic analysis. The analysis was informed by contextual information from a prior study, describing the same participants' weight history from childhood to motherhood along with their perceptions of childhood quality.

RESULTS

This study comprised of an overarching theme supported by three main themes. The overarching theme, Being pregnant with a high BMI: a vulnerable condition, reflected the challenge of entering maternity care with obesity, especially for women unprepared to be seen as "outside the norm". Women who had grown up with body criticism and childhood bullying were more prepared to have their weight addressed in maternity care. The first theme, Loaded conversations: a balancing act, emphasizes how pregnant women with a history of body criticism or obesity-related otherness proactively protect their integrity against weight bias, stigma and shame. The women also described how some healthcare providers balance or avoid weight and risk conversations for the same reasons. Dehumanization: an unintended drawback of standardized care makes apparent the pitfalls of prioritizing standardization over person-centered care. Finally, the third theme, The ambivalence of discussing weight and lifestyle, represent women's underlying ambivalence towards current weight practices in maternity care.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that standardized weight and risk monitoring, along with lifestyle guidance in maternity care, can place the pregnant women with obesity in a vulnerable position, contrasting with the emotionally supportive care that women with obesity report needing. Learning from these women's experiences and their urge for an unloaded communication to protect their integrity highlights the importance of focusing on patient-centered practices instead of standardized care to create a safe space for health promotion.

Factors Influencing Weight Management in Pregnant Women with Overweight or Obesity: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies

BACKGROUND

Overweight and obesity have multiple negative consequences for the health of both the mother and the child. Interventions to prevent excessive weight gain during pregnancy have had varying success, and the proportion of pregnant women who exceed national guidelines for weight gain continues to increase.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of factors on weight management among pregnant women with overweight or obesity.

METHODS

This meta-synthesis of qualitative studies involved searching databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science. The databases were searched on October 4, 2022, and the search was updated on April 21, 2023. The screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts was conducted utilizing Covidence software. The quality assessment of the articles was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. The Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research statement was used to enhance transparency in reporting. A meta-aggregation approach was used to guide the data extraction and synthesis.

RESULTS

A total of 46 studies with appropriate Critical Appraisal Skills Programme scores were included for qualitative synthesis. Findings were extracted and integrated into 4 themes: psychological factors (personally driven negative emotions and society-driven negative emotions), social factors (societal attitudes and beliefs and social support resources), factors related to education and counseling (information provision and communication), and factors associated with effective care (provided care components and the method of providing effective care).

CONCLUSIONS

To improve weight management during pregnancy, health care providers should provide tailored and individualized recommendations that take into consideration the factors influencing these women.

Planning for the forgotten fourth trimester of pregnancy: A parallel group randomized control trial to test a postpartum planning intervention vs. standard prenatal care

BACKGROUND

Black and brown birthing people experience persistent disparities in adverse maternal health outcomes, partially due to inadequate perinatal care. The goal of this study is to design and evaluate a patient-centered intervention for obstetric patients with one or more cardiometabolic risk factors for severe maternal morbidity [gestational diabetes, diabetes mellitus, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (chronic hypertension, preeclampsia, eclampsia, or gestational hypertension), or preconception obesity (BMI > 30)] to promote postpartum visit attendance.

METHODS

To address identified unmet needs for postpartum support and barriers to postpartum care, we developed 20 thematic postpartum planning modules, each with corresponding patient educational materials, community resources, care coordination protocols, and clinician support tools (decision aids, electronic medical record prompts and fields). During prenatal care encounters, a research coordinator delivers the educational content (in English or Spanish), facilitates the participant's planning and shared decision-making, provides the participant with resources, and documents decisions in the electronic medical record. We will randomize 320 eligible patients with a 1:1 ratio to the intervention or standard prenatal care and evaluate the impact on postpartum visit attendance at 4-12 weeks and secondary outcomes (postpartum mental health, perceived future maternal and cardiometabolic risk, contraceptive use, primary care use, readmission, and patient satisfaction with care).

DISCUSSION

Through engagement with patients and community stakeholders, we developed a guideline-based, locally tailored intervention to address drivers of engagement with postpartum care for high-risk obstetric patients. If demonstrated to be effective, the educational materials and electronic medical record based-tool can be adapted to other settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05430815) on June 23, 2022.

The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Experiential Training Model on Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Healthcare Workers in Maternity Health Management: A Preliminary Study

Background

Maternity health management has always been the area of concern and considering, and considering its complexity and multidisciplinary, it is necessary to provide effective training for healthcare workers.

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary experiential training model on the knowledge, attitude, and practice of healthcare workers in maternity health management.

Patients and Methods

We conducted a novel educational model, Multidisciplinary Maternity Health Experiential Training based on Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (MMHET), which combined theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and human-centred humanistic care, offering a comprehensive offline education program supported by online teaching materials structured around knowledge graphs. Pre- and post-test surveys were used to assess the changes in participants' knowledge, attitudes, and practices.

Results

From May to July 2023, a total of 322 participants attended the course, and only a small percentage had participated in experiential training. For all topics, the vast majority of participants endorsed the course, and the attitude content had the highest percentage of participants who said they agreed. Among the groups with different years of working life, the highest percentage of participants in the >20 years group strongly endorsed the course.

Conclusion

The preliminary findings indicate that the MMHET model is well-received and feasible, demonstrating its potential to enhance maternity health management education.

'It's not me, it's them' - a report describing the weight-related attitudes towards obesity in pregnancy among maternal healthcare providers

BACKGROUND

Occurrences of weight stigma have been documented in prenatal clinical settings from the perspective of pregnant patients, however little is known from the viewpoint of healthcare providers themselves. Reported experiences of weight stigma caused by maternal healthcare providers may be due to negative attitudes towards obesity in pregnancy and a lack of obesity specific education. The objective of this study was to assess weight-related attitudes and assumptions towards obesity in pregnancy among maternal healthcare providers in order to inform future interventions to mitigate weight stigma in prenatal clinical settings.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was administered online for maternal healthcare providers in Canada that assessed weight-related attitudes and assumptions towards lifestyle behaviours in pregnancy for patients who have obesity. Participants indicated their level of agreement on a 5-point likert scale, and mean scores were calculated with higher scores indicating poorer attitudes. Participants reported whether they had observed weight stigma occur in clinical settings. Finally, participants were asked whether or not they had received obesity-specific training, and attitude scores were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Seventy-two maternal healthcare providers (midwives, OBGYNs, residents, perinatal nurses, and family physicians) completed the survey, and 79.2% indicated that they had observed pregnant patients with obesity experience weight stigma in a clinical setting. Those who had obesity training perceived that their peers had poorer attitudes (3.7 ± 0.9) than those without training (3.1 ± 0.7; t(70) = 2.23, p = 0.029, Cohen's d = 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Weight stigma occurs in prenatal clinical environments, and this was confirmed by maternal healthcare providers themselves. These findings support advocacy efforts to integrate weight stigma related content and mitigation strategies in medical education for health professionals, including maternal healthcare providers. Future work should include prospective examination of weight related attitudes among maternal healthcare providers and implications of obesity specific education, including strategies on mitigating weight stigma in the delivery of prenatal care.

Weight Bias Among Certified Nurse-Midwives and Certified Midwives: Findings From a National Sample

INTRODUCTION

Weight bias toward individuals with higher body weights permeates health care settings in the United States and has been associated with poor weight-related communication and quality of care as well as adverse health outcomes. However, there has been limited quantitative investigation into weight bias among perinatal care providers. Certified nurse-midwives (CNMs)/certified midwives (CMs) attend approximately 11% of all births in the United States. The aims of this study were to measure the direction and extent of weight bias among CNMs/CMs and compare their levels of weight bias to the US public and other health professionals.

METHODS

Through direct postcard distribution, social media accounts, professional networks, and email listservs, American Midwifery Certification Board (AMCB)-certified midwives were solicited to complete an online survey of their implicit weight bias using the Implicit Association Test and their explicit weight bias using the Antifat Attitudes Questionnaire, Fat Phobia Scale, and Preference for Thin People measure.

RESULTS

A total of 2257 midwives participated in the survey, yielding a completion rate of 17.7%. Participants were mostly White and female, with a median age of 46 years and 11 years since AMCB certification. More than 70% of midwives have some level of implicit weight bias, although to a lesser extent compared with previously published findings among the US public (P < .01) and other health professionals (P < .01). In a subsample comparison of female midwives to female physicians, implicit weight bias levels were similar (P > .05). Midwives also express explicit weight bias, but at lower levels than the US public and other health professionals (P < .05).

DISCUSSION

This study provides the first quantitative research documenting weight bias among a national US sample of perinatal care providers. Findings can inform educational efforts to mitigate weight bias in the perinatal care setting and decrease harm.

Clinicians Address Gestational Weight Gain and Nutrition Using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Nutrition Checklist

The negative effects of excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) and obesity during pregnancy are well documented in the literature. However, lack of time, education, comfort, and confidence among health care providers often make it difficult to provide proper nutrition and weight gain guidance for pregnant persons. In response, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) has developed a nutrition checklist that can standardize recommendations for GWG, facilitate discussions with pregnant persons, and aid providers with nutrition education. The checklist is an innovative tool that can help reduce complications associated with excessive GWG. This article discusses the benefits of FIGO Nutrition Checklist and its implementation at a midwifery clinic that primarily serves Native American women. By using this quick, simple, guided, time-efficient tool, clinics can be successful in facilitating important conversations and education about nutrition and GWG during pregnancy.

Receiving gestational weight gain recommendations and associated risks: A qualitative study among low-income women

Appropriate weight gain goals promote healthy gestational weight gain (GWG). Despite receiving recommendations from their providers, most women do not know how much weight they should gain during pregnancy. This study sought to describe the experiences of pregnant women when given GWG recommendations. The research proceeded using a phenomenological approach. With Institutional Review Board approval, primigravida women with a healthy singleton pregnancy at 8-20 weeks gestation were recruited from the community and purposively from a low-income obstetrics clinic. Within 60-minutes, trained interviewers 1) presented GWG recommendations and associated risks; and 2) interviewed participants using a semi-structured guide. Participants received a $40 gift card. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Two trained coders used Braun and Clarke's (2020) reflexive thematic analysis procedures. When presented with GWG information, participants (n = 29, Mage = 25.5, 4.7 SD) proceeded to: 1) make sense of the information, 2) evaluate the credibility of the information, 3) weigh the importance of the information, 4) predict likely outcomes, and 5) plan behaviors. Participants who were able to understand the information, found it to be credible and important, and who predicted adverse outcomes for failing to adhere to recommendations reported intentions for health promoting behaviors. Future research should test GWG counseling methods based on these cognitive processes. Clinicians should consider these 5 cognitive processes when providing initial GWG counseling.

Women's perceptions of body mass graphics and their preferences for weight counselling

Health care providers may lack data-driven guidance about best practises for discussing weight. We assessed women's self-perception of body mass index (BMI) and preferences for weight counselling by provider characteristics and the initiating question. A voluntary, anonymous survey was completed by 756 women (age ≥ 19 year) at our tertiary care obstetrics and gynaecology clinics in autumn 2021. The respondents' height and weight were collected before respondents selected graphics from a validated Body Image Scale that they felt best represented their current body size and which graphs should prompt weight loss or gain recommendations. Respondents were asked their preferences about provider characteristics for discussion about weight and to identify which of six initiating questions from a provider was most and least preferred. Blank responses were allowed. In 708 responses, 366 women (52%) selected the most accurate graphic that corresponded to their BMI; the selected graphic represented a lower than actual BMI in 268 women (38%) and higher in 74 women (10%). In 648 responses, 374 women (58%) preferred a female provider, but provider body shape, ethnicity/race and age were not important to most women. The most preferred question to initiate a discussion about weight was "A lot of women have trouble achieving or maintaining a healthy weight; is that something we can discuss?" in 181 of 555 women (33%), and the least preferred question was "Do you feel like you are at an appropriate weight?" in 172 of 554 women (31%). Provider knowledge about patient preferences regarding questions may facilitate the discussion about weight.

Mitigating Weight Bias in the Clinical Setting: A New Approach to Care

Weight bias toward patients in larger bodies is pervasive among health care providers and can negatively influence provider-patient communication, as well as patients' behavior and health outcomes. Weight bias has historical roots that perpetuate thinness and Whiteness as the cultural norm. Although weight bias remains socially acceptable in US culture, contributing factors to an individual's body size are complex and multifactorial. Providers and health care systems also consistently use body mass index (BMI) as an indicator of health status, despite its limitations and harmful effects in the clinical setting. This state of the science review presents 8 evidence-based strategies that demonstrate how to mitigate harm from weight bias and improve quality of care and health outcomes for patients living in larger bodies. Person-centered approaches to care include (1) eliminating clinical recommendations to lose weight; (2) shifting from a focus on weight to health; (3) implementing a size and weight-inclusive approach; (4) engaging in weight bias self-evaluation; (5) creating a welcoming environment for patients of all sizes; (6) seeking permission and learning the patient's story; (7) using weight-inclusive language; and (8) re-evaluating clinical guidelines and policies based on BMI. Midwives and other health care providers may benefit from training that re-imagines the delivery of health care to patients in larger bodies.

Sex gaps in perception of tobacco conversations between adult patients who now smoke cigarettes and oral health care providers: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017-March 2020 prepandemic

BACKGROUND

Smoking cessation is difficult. A potential gap based on sex exists in the tobacco cessation aid that dental care professionals provide to patients. The purpose of this research was to examine whether there is a sex difference in dental patients' reports of having a direct conversation about the benefits of giving up cigarettes or other types of tobacco products with their oral health care provider.

METHODS

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017-March 2020 prepandemic data were used in this cross-sectional study for participants 18 years and older who reported that they "now smoke cigarettes," had a dental visit within the previous year, self-reported their sex, and responded whether their oral health care provider had a direct conversation about the benefits of giving up cigarettes or other types of tobacco products to improve dental health at their last visit (n = 582). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to compare data according to sex.

RESULTS

Overall, 50.7% of patients (59.2% of men, 42.9% of women; P = .0037) reported having a conversation about tobacco cessation at their dental visit. The odds of women reporting having no such discussion were twice those of men (odds ratio, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.10 to 4.28; P = .0270).

CONCLUSIONS

One-half of the participants reported having no tobacco cessation conversation about the benefits of giving up cigarettes or other types of tobacco with their dental care provider. Women were twice as likely to report no such discussion.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Oral health care providers need to ensure that primary and secondary prevention information and intervention programs about the benefits of giving up cigarettes or other types of tobacco products are provided equitably to all patients.

Patient-Perceived Patient-Centeredness During Pregnancy

OBJECTIVES

Although patient-centeredness is a pinnacle in high-quality healthcare, there is a lack of research measuring patient-centeredness from the perspective of the patient in the context of perinatal care. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to (1) measure patient-perceived patient-centeredness from pregnant people receiving prenatal care in Nova Scotia, and (2) explore potential correlates of patient-perceived patient-centeredness.

METHODS

Participants completed an e-survey through REDCap software. Questions comprised of the Patient-Perceived Patient-Centeredness (Revised) (PPPC-R) questionnaire and demographic questions. The PPPC-R total score was calculated. Descriptive statistics were calculated to describe the sample, and inferential statistics were conducted. Linear regression analysis was used to determine how the independent variables predicted the PPPC-R total score.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients participated in the survey to completion. The mean PPPC-R total score was 62.2 (SD 10.5), equivalent to a score of 3.45/4. No significant correlates of the PPPC-R total score were identified; however, trends were observed related to age, parity, Body mass index, race/ethnicity, and education.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants in our study rated their clinicians' patient-centeredness very highly. There was no significant difference in PPPC-R score among pregnant people based on the independent variables we collected.

A systematic review of behaviour change techniques used in the context of stillbirth prevention

BACKGROUND

Stillbirth is one of the most devastating pregnancy outcomes that families can experience. Previous research has associated a wide range of risk factors with stillbirth, including maternal behaviours such as substance use, sleep position and attendance and engagement with antenatal care. Hence, some preventive efforts have been focused on tackling the behavioural risk factors for stillbirth. This study aimed to identify the Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs) used in behaviour change interventions tacking behavioural risk factors for stillbirth such as substance use, sleep position, unattendance to antenatal care and weight management.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review of the literature was conducted in June 2021 and updated in November 2022 in five databases: CINHAL, Psyhinfo, SociIndex, PubMed and Web of Science. Studies published in high-income countries describing interventions designed in the context of stillbirth prevention, reporting stillbirth rates and changes in behaviour were eligible for inclusion. BCTs were identified using the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy v1.

RESULTS

Nine interventions were included in this review identified in 16 different publications. Of these, 4 interventions focused on more than one behaviour (smoking, monitoring fetal movements, sleep position, care-seeking behaviours), one focused on smoking, three on monitoring fetal movements and one on sleep position. Twenty-seven BCTs were identified across all interventions. The most commonly used was "Information about health consequences" (n = 7/9) followed by "Adding objects to the environment" (n = 6/9). One of the interventions included in this review has not been assessed for efficacy yet, of the remaining eight, three showed results in the reduction of stillbirth rates. and four interventions produced behaviour change (smoking reductions, increased knowledge, reduced supine sleeping time).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that interventions designed to date have limited effects on the rates of stillbirth and utilise a limited number of BCTs which are mostly focused on information provision. Further research is necessary to design evidence base behaviour change interventions with a greater focus to tackle all the other factors influencing behaviour change during pregnancy (e.g.: social influence, environmental barriers).

Midwives' experiences of supporting healthy gestational weight management: A mixed methods systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Excessive levels of gestational weight gain (GWG) are linked with poorer health outcomes for mother and baby, including an increased risk of pregnancy-related hypertension, labour induction, caesarean delivery and increased birth weight.

OBJECTIVE

To explore literature relating to midwives' experiences and challenges and identify interventions relating to GWG.

DESIGN

This review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for mixed methods systematic reviews. CINAHL complete, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, the Cochrane Library and MEDLINE were systematically searched in May 2022. Search terms related to midwives, advice, weight management and experiences were used. A PRISMA approach was taken to identify data, and thematic analysis combined with descriptive statistics allowed synthesis and integration.

FINDINGS

Fifty-seven papers were included and three overarching themes were generated; i) emotion and weight, ii) ability to influence and iii) practical challenges and strategies for success. Weight was consistently described as a sensitive topic. Challenges included level of expertise and comfort, perceptions of ability to influence and an awareness of incongruence of midwives' own weight and the advice they are delivering. Interventions evaluated well with some self-reports of improved knowledge and confidence. There was no evidence of impact on practice or GWG.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

Although addressing maternal weight gain is an international priority due to the significant risks incurred, in this review we have identified multiple challenges for midwives to support women in healthy weight management. Identified interventions targeting midwives do not directly address the challenges identified and are therefore likely to be insufficient to improve existing practice.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Partnership working and co-creation with women and midwives is essential to ensure knowledge about maternal weight gain is effectively shared across communities to catalyse change.

My Baby, My Move+: feasibility of a community prenatal wellbeing intervention

BACKGROUND

Excessive gestational weight gain (EGWG), insufficient prenatal physical activity and sleep, and poor psychological wellbeing independently increase risks for adverse maternal and infant outcomes. A novel approach to mitigate these risks is utilizing peer support in a community-based prenatal intervention. This study assessed the feasibility (acceptability, demand, implementation, and practicality) of a remotely delivered prenatal physical activity intervention called My Baby, My Move + (MBMM +) that aims to increase prenatal physical activity, enhance mood and sleep hygiene, and reduce EGWG.

METHODS

Participants were recruited through community organizations, local clinics, and social media platforms in the Fall of 2020 and Spring of 2021. Eligible pregnant women were randomized to either the MBMM + intervention or the control group. Each group met over Zoom for 16 sessions (twice weekly for 60 min over 8 weeks) to learn either behavioral change and wellbeing knowledge and skills (MBMM +) or knowledge and skills related to parenting (control group). Multiple methods of evaluation to better understand the feasibility of the intervention were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 49 women (25 MBMM + intervention, 24 control) completed both pre- and post-survey assessments and were included in the analyses. A subsample of 19 (39%) intervention participants completed a combination of semi-structured interviews/surveys to assess acceptability, demand, implementation, and practicality. Participants expressed positive feedback regarding acceptability (satisfaction and intent to continue use) and were extremely likely or likely to recommend the program to a friend (demand). Implementation metrics were assessed by observation and feedback forms completed by peer leaders and demonstrated high-quality control. Findings suggest that the intervention was practical due to remote sessions and cost-effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

The MBMM + intervention was deemed to be a feasible intervention with high acceptability, demand, implementation, and practicality. These findings can be used to inform the scalability of the intervention and implementation of a larger efficacy trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

19-1366, initial date is on January 23, 2020.

A mixed methods systematic review of midwives' clinical practices related to prenatal care of women with obesity

OBJECTIVE

Maternal obesity has been related to adverse maternal and infant outcomes. It is a persistent challenge of midwifery care worldwide and can present clinical challenges and complications. This review sought to identify evidence on the practice patterns of midwives related to prenatal care of women with obesity.

METHODS

The databases Academic Search Premier, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL PLUS with Full Text, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, and MEDLINE were searched November 2021. Search terms included weight, obesity, practices, and midwives. Inclusion criteria included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method studies that addressed practice patterns of midwives related to prenatal care of women with obesity published in peer-reviewed journals, written in English. The recommended Joanna Briggs Institute approach to mixed methods systematic reviews was followed e.g. study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and a convergent segregated method of data synthesis and integration.

RESULTS

Seventeen articles from 16 studies were included. The quantitative evidence showed a lack of knowledge, confidence, and support for midwives that would facilitate adequate management of pregnant women with obesity while the qualitative evidence revealed that midwives desire a sensitive approach to discussing obesity and the risks associated with maternal obesity.

DISCUSSION

Quantitative and qualitative literature report consistent individual and system-level barriers to implementing evidence-based practices. Implicit bias training, midwifery curriculum updates, and the use of patient centered care models may help overcome these challenges.

Weight Stigma and Barriers to Effective Obesity Care

Weight stigma is prevalent with negative consequences for health and well-being. This problem is present in health care; stigmatizing attitudes toward patients with obesity are expressed by medical professionals across diverse specialties and patient care settings. This article summarizes the ways in which weight stigma creates barriers to effective care, including poor patient-provider communication, reduced quality of care, and healthcare avoidance. Priorities for stigma reduction in healthcare are discussed, with a clear need for multifaceted approaches and inclusion of people with obesity whose perspectives can inform strategies to effectively remove bias-related barriers to patient care.

Physical activity counseling received throughout pregnancy and effect on behaviors: a quasi-experimental study

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to examine the frequency of physical activity counseling for pregnant women over the course of their pregnancies and the effect on the women's physical activity behaviors.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental study was conducted in the Maternity Unit of a hospital. Seventy-two pregnant women were randomized into a control or intervention group. Counseling about physical activity was dispensed to the women in the intervention group throughout pregnancy by health professionals who had been sensitized to its importance and the recommendations. The women in the control group received the usual consultation content. The physical activity behavior of the pregnant women in the intervention group who reported receiving physical activity counseling was evaluated. The counseling and physical activity levels were evaluated by Chi2 tests and repeated measures ANOVAs, respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, the women received little counseling in accordance with the recommendations, although the intervention group women received this counseling more frequently (p=0.049). All women in the intervention group who reported received counseling throughout pregnancy limited their decline in physical activity compared to those in the control group. The decline in total physical activity among normal-weight and overweight pregnant women was reduced in the intervention group (respectively, p=0.043 and p=0.044).

CONCLUSION

Our intervention showed the effectiveness of counseling on physical activity behaviors, although the effect was observed at the end of pregnancy. Training and sensitizing for professionals should be strengthened to ensure that counseling in line with the recommendations to maintain or increase physical activity levels throughout pregnancy is provided.

Differences in outpatient, emergency, and inpatient use among pregnant women with a substance-related diagnosis

BACKGROUND

As a vulnerable population, pregnant women with a substance-related diagnosis (ie, substance use, misuse, or dependence) may use healthcare disproportionately.

OBJECTIVE

The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the differences in the use of outpatient clinical visits, emergency department visits, and inpatient days in the hospital among women with and without a substance-related diagnosis during the antepartum period.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective study retrieved electronic health record data on women (age, 18-44 years) who delivered a single live birth or stillbirth at ≥20 weeks of gestation from April 1, 2012, to September 30, 2019. Imbalance in measured maternal sociodemographic and obstetrical characteristics between women with and without a substance-related diagnosis was attenuated using propensity score matching on key demographic characteristics (eg, age), yielding a matched 1:1 sample. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regressions models were used to determine the association between a substance-related diagnosis and outpatient visits, emergency visits, and inpatient days.

RESULTS

From the total sample (n=16,770), the matched cohort consisted of 1986 deliveries. Of these, most were White (51.0%), or mixed or of some other race (31.1%). The mean age was 29.8 (standard deviation, 5.6). A substance-related diagnosis was identified in 993 women (50%) because of matching. Women with a substance-related diagnosis were more likely to have ≤10 outpatient visits than women without a substance-related diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.81 [95% confidence interval, 1.44-2.28]; P<.0001). Alcohol-, opioid-, and stimulant-related diagnoses were independently associated with ≤10 outpatient visits (adjusted odds ratio, 3.16 [95% confidence interval, 1.67-6.04]; P=.0005; adjusted odds ratio, 3.02 [95% confidence interval, 1.79-5.09]; P<.0001; adjusted odds ratio, 2.18 [95% confidence interval, 1.39-3.41]; P=.0007, respectively). Women with a substance-related diagnosis were more likely to have ≥1 emergency visit than women without a substance-related diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.36 [95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.85]; P<.0001). Opioid-, stimulant-, and nicotine-related diagnoses were independently associated with ≥1 emergency visit (adjusted odds ratio, 2.28 [95% confidence interval, 1.09-4.77]; P=.0287; adjusted odds ratio, 2.01 [95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.78]; P=.0301; adjusted odds ratio, 3.38 [95% confidence interval, 1.90-6.02]; P<.0001, respectively). Women with a substance-related diagnosis were more likely to have ≥3 inpatient days than women without a substance-related diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.69 [95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.67]; P=.0256). Opioid-, stimulant-, and nicotine-related diagnosis were independently associated with ≥3 inpatient days (adjusted odds ratio, 3.52 [95% confidence interval, 1.42-8.75]; P=.0067; adjusted odds ratio, 3.51 [95% confidence interval, 1.31-9.34]; P=.0123; adjusted odds ratio, 2.74 [95% confidence interval, 1.11-6.73]; P=.0285, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Women with a substance-related diagnosis during the antepartum period who delivered a single live birth or stillbirth at ≥20 weeks of gestation were experiencing fewer outpatient visits, more emergency department visits, and more inpatient days than women without a substance-related diagnosis. The type of substance-related diagnosis (eg, alcohol, opioids, stimulants, or nicotine) was associated with different patterns of healthcare use. The results from this study have reinforced the need to identify substance-related diagnoses in pregnant women early to minimize disproportionate healthcare service utilization through intervention and treatment.

Healthcare Professional Training Regarding Gestational Weight Gain: Recommendations and Future Directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review was to summarise recent evaluations of healthcare professional training regarding gestational weight gain and provide recommendations for future training.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of evaluated healthcare professional training sessions regarding gestational weight gain show promising results in terms of increased participant confidence and knowledge and impact on women's outcomes. It is clear that the interventions which have also implemented resources in the practice environment to support training are the ones most likely to influence gestational weight gain. Support from healthcare professionals are key to influence pregnant women's weight gain and should be offered within the standard curriculum and through mandatory training. Factors influencing this support include women's and healthcare professional characteristics, interpersonal and healthcare system and policy factors. All of these need to be considered when developing healthcare professional training to support women with their gestational weight gain.

Physical Activity Advice and Counselling by Healthcare Providers: A Scoping Review

Background: Despite scientific evidence on prenatal physical activity and exercise, synthesized evidence is lacking on the provision of prenatal physical activity and exercise advice and counselling by prenatal healthcare providers. The scoping review seeks to fill this gap by synthesizing available literature on the provision of prenatal physical activity and exercise advice and counselling by prenatal healthcare providers to women during antenatal visits. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) search framework for scoping reviews was applied to retrieve original research articles on the prenatal physical activity and exercise practices of healthcare providers with pregnant women, published between 2010-2020, and available in English. The search databases included Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, EMBASE, The Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), BIOMED Central, Medline and African Journal Online. Studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were retrieved for analysis. Results: Out of the 82 articles that were retrieved for review, 13 met the eligibility criteria. Seven of the articles were quantitative, four qualitative, one mixed-method and one controlled, non-randomised study, respectively. Three themes emerged as major findings. Healthcare providers affirmed their responsibility in providing prenatal physical activity advice and counselling to pregnant women; however, they seldom or rarely performed this role. Major barriers to prenatal physical activity and exercise included insufficient time, lack of knowledge and skills, inadequate or insufficient training, and lack of resources. Conclusion: This review highlights salient features constraining the uptake of prenatal physical activity and exercise advice/counselling by prenatal healthcare providers in both community and clinical settings. Prenatal physical activity advice and counselling are key components to the promotion of physical activity adherence during and post-partum pregnancy; this requires adequate knowledge of physical activity prescriptions and recommendations, which are personalised and contextual to environment. Research is needed to examine the prenatal physical activity advice and counselling from prenatal healthcare providers on issues hindering effective delivery of the aforementioned in the context of promoting prenatal physical activity in clinical or community settings.

The Relationship Between Internalized Weight Stigma During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: A Prospective Longitudinal Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the relationship between internalized weight stigma during pregnancy and breastfeeding outcomes at 1 month post partum among individuals with prepregnancy overweight or obesity. Secondarily, the study explored the temporal stability of internalized weight stigma from the third trimester to 1 month post partum via the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS).

METHODS

A total of 103 pregnant individuals with overweight or obesity were recruited for this study. Participants completed the WBIS during the third trimester and self-reported breastfeeding initiation, continuation, and exclusivity outcomes at 1 month post partum. A paired t test and binomial logistic regression were conducted with covariates hierarchically added to the model.

RESULTS

The average prepregnancy BMI was 33.53 (SD 7.17) kg/m² (range = 25.4-62), and average prenatal WBIS scores were 25.95 (SD 11.83). No difference was found in mean prenatal and postpartum scores (25.95 [SD 11.83]; 26.86 [SD 13.03], respectively; t₉₄ = -0.83, P = 0.41), evidencing temporal stability in WBIS scores from pre to post partum. Prenatal WBIS scores did not predict breastfeeding initiation, continuation, or exclusivity at 1 month post partum in either unadjusted or adjusted models.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, this sample displayed low weight bias internalization, which was not predictive of breastfeeding initiation, continuation, or exclusivity at 1 month post partum. Future research is needed to develop a pregnancy-specific weight stigma measure.

Weight Stigma across the Preconception, Pregnancy, and Postpartum Periods: A Narrative Review and Conceptual Model

Weight stigma is a pervasive issue promoting significant adverse health and psychosocial consequences. Preconception, pregnant, and postpartum women are particularly vulnerable to weight stigma, which can directly impact their health and that of the next generation. Of note, weight stigma affects women living with obesity who are already at risk for developing gestational diabetes and experiencing associated stigmas. This narrative review aimed to examine the literature on weight stigma across the preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum periods, specifically to (1) synthesize the evidence using a socioecological lens; (2) develop a conceptual model of weight stigma tailored to women across this life phase; and (3) provide recommendations for future research. To date, weight stigma research across the preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum periods has focused predominately on pregnancy and antenatal care. The drivers and facilitators of this stigma are pervasive, occurring across various contexts and settings. Manifestations of weight stigma include decreased reproductive healthcare quality, mental health symptoms, poorer health behaviors, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Future research should further investigate the experiences of women preconception and postpartum, and health/social impacts beyond healthcare. The model herein will guide such research to ultimately identify opportunities for stigma reduction and improve multigenerational health and well-being outcomes.

Prenatal care experiences among pregnant women with obesity in Wisconsin, United States: a qualitative quality improvement assessment

BACKGROUND

Stigma and bias experienced during prenatal care can affect quality of care and, ultimately, the health of pregnant women with obesity and their infants. We sought to 1) better understand the bias and stigma that women with BMIs ≥40 kg/m2 experience while receiving prenatal care, 2) gauge women's interest in group prenatal education for women with obesity, and 3) gather feedback about their preferred weight-related terminology.

METHODS

We conducted and thematically content-analyzed 30 semi-structured interviews of women with BMIs ≥40 kg/m2 who received prenatal care at a university-affiliated teaching hospital in the Midwest region of the United States.

RESULTS

All women recalled positive experiences during their perinatal care during which they felt listened to and respected by providers. However, many also described a fear of weight-related bias or recalled weight-based discrimination. Women reacted favorably to a proposed group prenatal care option for pregnant women with obesity that focused on nutrition, physical activity, and weight management. Women rated "weight" and "BMI" as the most desirable terms for describing weight, while "large size" and "obesity" were rated least desirable.

CONCLUSIONS

Many pregnant women with BMIs ≥40 kg/m2 experience bias in the prenatal care setting. Potential steps to mitigate bias towards weight include improving provider awareness of the experiences and perspectives of this population, expanding prenatal care options targeted towards women with high BMIs, including group care, and using patient-preferred weight-related terminology. Through the remainder of this manuscript, wherever possible, the term "high BMI" will be used in place of the term "obesity" to describe women with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 in order to respect the preferred terminology of the women we interviewed.

She "didn't see my weight; she saw me, a mom who needed help breastfeeding": Perceptions of perinatal weight stigma and its relationship with breastfeeding experiences

Weight stigmatization is related to emotional and psychological distress including low self-esteem, body image dissatisfaction, depression, and anxiety; all linked with suboptimal breastfeeding outcomes. This qualitative descriptive study explored postpartum individuals' recalled experiences of weight stigma during interactions with perinatal healthcare professionals and its perceived influence on their breastfeeding experiences. Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with (n= 18) participants. Three themes emerged: (1) "Size Doesn't Matter: They Looked Beyond the Scale," (2) "My Self-Confidence and Desire to Breastfeed is More Important than Weight," and (3) "I Was on My Own"-Limited Social Support not Weight Stigma Influenced Breastfeeding.