Child participation in triadic medical consultations: A scoping review and summary of promotive interventions

Pain by proxy: An ethnographic study on the relational co-construction of the agency of young children in healthcare encounters

Access to pain management is a human right. Nevertheless, research consistently reports that children's pain is under-recognised and under-treated compared to that of adults. Additionally, younger children are less likely to receive treatment for their pain. The significance of early-life healthcare experiences is often underestimated due to constructions of young children as passive rather than active agents in healthcare. This study addresses this issue by examining how children's agency is co-constructed within the triad of children, caregivers, and healthcare professionals during childhood vaccination consultations. Field notes were collected describing vaccination consultations involving children aged two months to seven years, with an overrepresentation of children under the age of two due to the study's focus. Ethnographic observations (∼275.5 h) were held in Belgium, Italy, and Portugal, due to their diversity in healthcare system characteristics, vaccination policy, and coverage. Data were analysed using template analysis, a specific type of thematic analysis. Findings illustrate that children inherently possess agency, which can be hindered or facilitated by caregivers and healthcare professionals in the healthcare setting. Although clinical guidelines on pain mitigation for paediatric vaccinations exist, the findings show that these are not consistently applied in practice. Providing a framework for understanding the variability in paediatric pain mitigation, we highlight the socio-cultural conditions by which young children are either socialised into the patient role, or have their status as patients undermined. In pursuit of quality healthcare and pain mitigation for children during vaccination consultations, it is necessary that they are considered and treated as active, embodied healthcare agents.

Implementing the My Positive Health dialogue tool for children with a chronic condition: barriers and facilitators

BACKGROUND

The My Positive Health (MPH) dialogue tool for children was developed to aid children and teenagers in reflecting and communicating about their health from a broader perspective. This study investigates facilitators and barriers to implementation in pediatric care and assesses experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and children regarding effectiveness.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-methods study involving six Dutch pediatric outpatient clinics. Quantitative data on facilitators and barriers were obtained from 18 out of 20 participating HCPs (pediatricians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants) using the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations. Additionally, qualitative insights were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 17 HCPs and 30 children (8-18 years old) with chronic conditions.

RESULTS

Facilitators identified in both user and innovation domains included improved patient understanding and the tool's simplicity, while barriers involved organizational constraints and integration issues, for example limited resources and lack of organizational support. Participating HCPs highlighted the tool's role in fostering person-centered conversations, especially for children with chronic conditions. Children positively viewed the tool, noting its ability to enable deeper, personalized interactions with HCPs.

CONCLUSION

This study on the implementation of the MPH dialogue tool for children in pediatric care highlights its user-friendliness and relevance, alongside challenges like organizational constraints. Beneficial for person-centered care and children's active participation, the tool enhanced healthcare dialogues and empowered children in their health journey. However, HCPs faced integration challenges within existing practices. Addressing these barriers and providing organizational support are vital for effectively implementing the MPH dialogue tool and optimizing pediatric patient engagement and care quality.

Education Research: A Qualitative Analysis of Communication-Focused Feedback Provided to Child Neurology Residents During an Objective Structured Clinical Examination

Background and Objectives

Child neurology is a specialty with unique challenges in communication. Child neurologists face many complex disorders with a wide array of prognoses and treatments as well as the need to communicate at various developmental levels. Limited literature exists regarding effective communication training during child neurology residency. Our aim was to evaluate feedback provided to child neurology residents by standardized patients (SPs) and faculty during a communication-focused objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for common themes and identify which elements of communication feedback are most valuable to the residents.

Methods

The child neurology residency at Nationwide Children's Hospital previously developed a set of OSCE cases to assess residents' communication skills. Using a qualitative approach, we used content analysis to identify themes from the feedback residents received from SPs and faculty observers. After themes were identified, we held a focus group with residents to determine which themes contained helpful feedback.

Results

Residents found feedback from both SPs and faculty observers to be important, and how information was delivered was identified as the most impactful type of feedback. Residents appreciated positive feedback from SPs and faculty, especially when aimed at reinforcing a specific behavior that was performed well. Feedback that residents identified as particularly helpful, although not commonly provided, was the recognition of a potential unconscious bias in an encounter. Feedback the residents found less useful was discussing the medical specifics of the case. The most frequently provided types of feedback were not necessarily the most helpful feedback for both SP and faculty feedback.

Discussion

OSCEs can be an effective tool to provide child neurology residents with immediate feedback on their communication skills with difficult conversations in a safe environment. Residents find value in feedback from both the SPs and faculty observers. Certain elements of feedback are more helpful than others. This knowledge could be used to develop an assessment tool to guide feedback from child neurology-specific communication simulation.

Child-physician rapport at a neurodevelopmental clinic: In the eyes of the beholder

BACKGROUND

Building rapport with young patients is crucial for fostering a sense of comfort that enhances their cooperation during clinical encounters and improves clinical outcomes. The available data on children with neurodevelopmental disabilities in community-based settings, including data on child-physician rapport, is limited.

AIMS

To examine how children with neurodevelopmental disabilities perceive rapport with treating physicians compared to parents and treating physicians and to evaluate the relationship between the child-reported rapport and its impact on their cooperation.

METHODS

One hundred two children with neurodevelopmental disabilities (M years = 9.63, SD = 2.42) completed the CHARM-C Questionnaire, which assessed their experience of rapport with their examining physicians following neurodevelopmental assessments. In parallel, their parents and physicians completed the CHARM-A Questionnaire, which assessed how they perceived the children's experience of rapport (a total of 306 questionnaires). The physicians also rated children's cooperation. The data were analyzed using correlation, regression, and mixed linear analyses.

RESULTS

Children's perceptions of rapport were significantly less positive than those of parents (d = -0.60) and physicians (d = -0.45). A moderate partial correlation (r = .37) was found between children's and parents' perceptions. Neither children's nor parents' perceptions were correlated with physicians' perceptions. Children's perceptions of rapport were positively associated with greater cooperation (β = .28).

DISCUSSION

Children with neurodevelopmental disabilities rated their rapport with physicians lower than parents and doctors. Their evaluations offer valuable insights, complementing caregivers' and professionals' perspectives. Training physicians to improve their assessments of children's needs during medical encounters is critically important.

"You Have to Find a Way for This Child to Be at the Center": Pediatric Cardiologists' Views on Triadic Communication in Consultations on Congenital Heart Defects

Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are present at birth and require ongoing management of personal, family, and medical aspects of care, including communication between family and medical staff. Effective communication is considered one of the main objectives of patient-centered care. Communication in pediatric medicine is especially challenging because it includes children and their parent(s), and children's cognitive and communication skills are still developing. Based on the model of behavior in pediatric communication , this study focused on pediatric cardiologists' views of the roles of children, parents, and physicians in the triadic encounter and their experiences in communicating information on pediatric CHDs in medical encounters. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 experienced pediatric cardiologists and cardiac surgeons (five women and 12 men) at three medical centers in Israel. The grounded theory approach was used to identify three main categories: (1) the positioning (centrality) of the child in the setting (ideal vs. actual situation), (2) addressing parents' emotional needs, and (3) the physician's role as mediator between parent(s) and child. In each category, three elements are discussed: The physician's agenda, obstacles and challenges, and the physician's practical methods. Physicians strongly support children's involvement in triadic encounters yet face challenges in effectively integrating them into the information exchange process during cardiology consultations. Struggling to balance the principles of patient- and family-centered care, and without clear guidelines, they rely on their personal beliefs and experiences to formulate communication strategies that address parents' and children's needs.

The implementation and strategy of triadic communication in pediatric oncology: a scoping review

Triad child-parent-professional communication is considered a priority in evaluating and optimizing therapeutic alliance in pediatric oncology. This scoping review aimed to map the existing evidence in implementation, influencing factors, and strategies of triadic communication in pediatric oncology. Using Arksey and O'Malley's framework, we searched 5 databases and grey literature until June 15th, 2024. Two researchers selected studies and extracted data independently. The PAGER framework was employed to summarize the implications of existing research to inform future research and practice. A total of 24 articles were included. Healthcare professionals usually initiate triadic communication. Communication topics rarely focused on prognosis, emotions, and end-of-life care. The triad child-parent-professional exhibited similarities in language, emotional, and decision-making communication preferences but differed regarding skills and information preferences. The roles of the triad parts were unclear, especially nurses' role, responsibilities, and contributions were seldom specified. Factors influencing the implementation spanned individual, organizational, and socio-cultural levels. Five types including 21 specific suggested strategies were identified to facilitate implementation, yet few strategies were adopted by patients and caregivers, and limited effectiveness studies have evaluated specific strategies. Overall, while triadic communication has received considerable attention in the world, its practical implementation in real-world settings remains largely underdeveloped. IMPACT: Our research has mapped the global trajectories of triadic communication between child-parent-professional throughout the cancer journey. A precise delineation of roles and responsibilities within the triadic communication framework in pediatric oncology is crucial for augmenting collaborative efforts and achieving optimal coordination among stakeholders. Healthcare professionals could partner with families to comprehend individual communication preferences, cultivating a collaborative relationship that honors each participant's needs and enhances informed decision-making. The findings equip healthcare professionals with a range of strategies to navigate communication with children with cancer and their parents.

Understanding autism and its treatment: The child's perspective

INTRODUCTION

While parents' and professionals' perceptions regarding children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have been studied extensively, limited data regarding the perspectives of children with ASD on their needs and the challenges they face are available. The study aimed to examine how children with ASD understand their condition and the aims of the interventions they undergo.

METHODS

Nineteen children and adolescents (ages 5.7-14.2 years) formally diagnosed with ASD, with borderline to high intelligence (range 70-140), and able to converse verbally were interviewed in person at a child development clinic. A qualitative approach was used to capture children's perceptions of their strengths and challenges and their understanding of a novel ASD treatment. The interview included direct and projective open-ended questions on each topic. Interpretive content analysis was used to evaluate the children's answers. Medical data were extracted from medical records. The children's parents completed questionnaires on their children's disability levels, awareness of ASD diagnosis, and sociodemographic details.

FINDINGS

Children spoke of their embodied sensations and feelings and discussed "normality" vs. "disability." They varied in their awareness of their diagnosis/symptoms, and only one boy named his diagnosis and described its consequences in detail. Most children lacked an understanding of the educational and therapeutic aspects of the goals set for them.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Children with ASD are aware of their unique emotional and behavioral challenges. Nevertheless, they are frequently excluded from the process of patient information provision and lack an understanding of the goals of interventions. Findings suggest the need to explore developmentally and emotionally adaptive ways to involve children with ASD in discussions of their condition and possible interventions.

Child participation during outpatient consultations: a mixed methods study

Although children wish to be included in their own healthcare, they recognize a gap between their right to be heard and their ability to become involved. Despite adaptation of medical consultation styles which suit a more patient-centered approach, data on the current state of child participation in clinical encounters are missing. We aimed to assess actual child participation in a Dutch pediatric clinic. Children aged 4-18 years visiting a pediatric outpatient clinic for consultation after general practitioner's referral were included. Sixteen consultations of six pediatricians were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Quantitative measurement included word count and speech turn; conversation analysis with qualitative appraisal provided data on participatory behavior. Quantitative child participation equaled parent participation in turns (28% vs 29%, respectively), but remained limited in words (relative contribution 11% for child, 23% for parent and 66% for pediatrician). Children spoke on average six words per speech turn. Child age correlated positively with participation in words (p = 0.022, r = 0.566) and turns (p =  < 0.001, r = 0.746). Children were mostly involved during social history taking, introduction, and physical examination but did not actively speak during the decision-making process. Children took an active role by instigating talks. Qualitative facilitators included appropriate language and verbal or non-verbal child allocated turns. Adults involved children by asking them questions and verifying their opinions or plans with the child. Teenagers participated most during the entire consultation, while younger children were more likely to lose their focus by the end of the conversation.

CONCLUSION

Despite increased turn taking, children's verbal participation remains low in pediatric consultations. If pediatricians and parents maintain a triadic conversation style throughout every stage of the medical encounter, child participation may increase.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Verbal child participation varies between 4 and 17%, measured in turns, words, speech time, or utterances. • Child participation is limited to social talk, laughter, and providing medical information.

WHAT IS NEW

• Child speech turns equal parental speech turns (28%), but average relative word count remains low (11%). • Three percent of the children's turns are defined a "contributing in decision making, giving their opinion or give consent," which equals three turns per consultation.

Perceived shared decision making and satisfaction with care among children and adolescents with special healthcare needs and their parents: Cross-sectional evidence from the PART-CHILD Study

OBJECTIVES

To compare shared decision making (SDM) and satisfaction with care (SWC), an indicator of care quality, between children with special healthcare needs (CSHCN) and parents and to assess the association between SDM and SWC in both groups.

METHODS

We recruited CSHCN ≥ 7 years and parents from 15 outpatient facilities that completed a paper questionnaire assessing SDM (highest vs. lower levels of SDM) and SWC. Differences in SDM and SWC were assessed with McNemar and paired t-tests. We used adjusted linear mixed models to investigate cross-sectional associations between SDM and SWC.

RESULTS

Based on data from 275 CSHCN and 858 parents, 39% and 64% of CSHCN and parents reported the highest level of SDM (p < 0.0001). No difference in SWC was observed (p = 0.36). Perceived SDM was associated with SWC in both groups (both p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Associations between SDM and SWC reinforce the role of SDM for care quality. Large proportions of CSHCN and parents reporting suboptimal levels of SDM highlight the need for effective programs to promote SDM in the target population.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Until effective programs become available, healthcare professionals can use existing opportunities to involve CSHCN and parents in consultations (e.g., provide sufficient opportunities to ask questions).

Questions directed to children with diverse communicative competencies in paediatric healthcare consultations

OBJECTIVE

This paper examines question-response sequences, in which clinicians asked questions to child patients who appear to interact using means other than the verbal mode of communication.

METHODS

Conversation Analysis methods were used to study questions in 46 paediatric palliative care consultations. These questions were directed towards children who observably used vocalisations and embodied modes of communication (e.g., gaze, gesture and facial expressions) but did not appear to use the verbal mode.

RESULTS

Most questions asked children either about their willingness and preferences for a proposed next activity, or their current feelings, experiences or intentions. Questions involved children by foregrounding their preferences and feelings. These questions occasioned contexts where the child's vocal or embodied conduct could be treated as a relevant response.

CONCLUSION

This paper demonstrates how questions are used to involve children in consultations about their own healthcare, and how their views come to be understood by clinicians and family members, even when children interact using means other than the verbal mode of communication.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Questions can be asked of both children who do and do not verbally communicate. When asking questions, clinicians should be mindful of the modes of communication an individual child uses to consider how the child might meaningfully respond.

The Concept of Child-Centred Care in Healthcare: A Scoping Review

Although child-centred care is increasingly referred to within the nursing literature, a clear definition of child-centred care and clarity around the concept is yet to be achieved. The objectives of this review were to examine the following: (1) What constitutes the concept of child-centred care in healthcare? (2) How has the concept of child-centred care developed? (3) What is the applicability of child-centred care and what are its limitations? (4) How does the concept of child-centred care benefit and inform children's healthcare? In total, 2984 papers were imported for screening, and, following the removal of duplicates and screening, 21 papers were included in the scoping review. The findings suggest that child-centred care is an emerging, ambiguous poorly defined concept; no clear consensus exists about what constitutes child-centred care. Although it seems antithetical to argue against child-centred care, little robust evidence was identified that demonstrates the impact and benefit of child-centred care. If child-centred care is to be a sustainable, convincing model to guide practice and compete with other models of care, it needs to establish robust evidence of its effectiveness, the impact on children and their families, as well as the wider impacts on the healthcare system.