Two Japanese Patients With SMA Type 1 Suggest that Axonal-SMN May Not Modify the Disease Severity

Stability and Oligomerization of Mutated SMN Protein Determine Clinical Severity of Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a common autosomal recessive neuromuscular disease characterized by defects of lower motor neurons. Approximately 95% of SMA patients are homozygous for survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene deletion, while ~5% carry an intragenic SMN1 mutation. Here, we investigated the stability and oligomerization ability of mutated SMN1 proteins. Plasmids containing wild- and mutant-type SMN1 cDNA were constructed and transfected into HeLa cells. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) demonstrated similar abundances of transcripts from the plasmids containing SMN cDNA, but Western blotting showed different expression levels of mutated SMN1 proteins, reflecting the degree of their instability. A mutated SMN1 protein with T274YfsX32 exhibited a much lower expression level than other mutated SMN1 proteins with E134K, Y276H, or Y277C. In immunoprecipitation analysis, the mutated SMN1 protein with T274YfsX32 did not bind to endogenous SMN1 protein in HeLa cells, suggesting that this mutation completely blocks the oligomerization with full-length SMN2 protein in the patient. The patient with T274YfsX32 showed a much more severe phenotype than the other patients with different mutations. In conclusion, the stability and oligomerization ability of mutated SMN1 protein may determine the protein stability and may be associated with the clinical severity of SMA caused by intragenic SMN1 mutation.

Phenotypes of SMA patients retaining SMN1 with intragenic mutation

BACKGROUND

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder caused by homozygous deletion or intragenic mutation of the SMN1 gene. It is well-known that high copy number of its homologous gene, SMN2, modifies the phenotype of SMN1-deleted patients. However, in the patients with intragenic SMN1 mutation, the relationship between phenotype and SMN2 copy number remains unclear.

METHODS

We have analyzed a total of 515 Japanese patients with SMA-like symptoms (delayed developmental milestones, respiratory failures, muscle weakness etc.) from 1996 to 2019. SMN1 and SMN2 copy numbers were determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method and/or multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) method. Intragenic SMN1 mutations were identified through DNA and RNA analysis of the fresh blood samples.

RESULTS

A total of 241 patients were diagnosed as having SMA. The majority of SMA patients showed complete loss of SMN1 (n = 228, 95%), but some patients retained SMN1 and carried an intragenic mutation in the retaining SMN1 (n = 13, 5%). Ten different mutations were identified in these 13 patients, consisting of missense, nonsense, frameshift and splicing defect-causing mutations. The ten mutations were c.275G > C (p.Trp92Ser), c.819_820insT (p.Thr274Tyrfs*32), c.830A > G (p.Tyr277Cys), c.5C > T (p.Ala2Val), c.826 T > C (p.Tyr276His), c.79C > T (p.Gln27*), c.188C > A (p.Ser63*), c.422 T > C (p.Leu141Pro), c.835-2A > G (exon 7 skipping) and c.835-3C > A (exon 7 skipping). It should be noted here that some patients with milder phenotype carried only a single SMN2 copy (n = 3), while other patients with severe phenotype carried 3 SMN2 copies (n = 4).

CONCLUSION

Intragenic mutations in SMN1 may contribute more significantly to clinical severity than SMN2 copy numbers.

Intron-retained transcripts of the spinal muscular atrophy genes, SMN1 and SMN2

BACKGROUND

The SMN genes, SMN1 and SMN2, are highly homologous genes which are related to the development or clinical severity of spinal muscular atrophy. Some alternative splicing patterns of the SMN genes have been well documented. In 2007, an SMN1 transcript with a full sequence of intron 3 was reported as the first intron-retained SMN transcript.

METHODS

Intron-retained SMN transcripts in various cells and tissues were studied using reverse transcription (RT)-PCR. HeLa cells were used for subcellular localization of the transcripts and protein expression analysis with Western blotting.

RESULTS

Two intron-retained SMN transcripts were detected, which contain full sequences of intron 2b or intron 3. These transcripts were produced from SMN1 and SMN2, and ubiquitously expressed in human cells and tissues. Western blotting analysis showed no proteins derived from the intron-retained transcripts. Fractionation analysis showed that these intron-retained transcripts were localized mainly in the nucleus. Contrary to our expectation, the intron-retained transcript levels decreased during the treatment of cycloheximide, an inhibitor of nonsense-mediated decay (NMD), suggesting that they were not targets of NMD.

CONCLUSION

Intron 2b-retained SMN transcript and intron3-retained SMN transcript were ubiquitously expressed in human cells and tissues. The intron-retained transcripts were mainly localized in the nucleus and decreased through non-NMD pathway.

SMA mutations in SMN Tudor and C-terminal domains destabilize the protein

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Most spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) patients are homozygous for survival of motor neuron 1 gene (SMN1) deletion. However, some SMA patients carry an intragenic SMN1 mutation. Such patients provide a clue to understanding the function of the SMN protein and the role of each domain of the protein. We previously identified mutations in the Tudor domain and C-terminal region of the SMN protein in three Japanese SMA patients. To clarify the effect of these mutations on protein stability, we conducted expression assays of SMN with mutated domains.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients A and B carried a mutation in SMN1 exon 3, which encodes a Tudor domain, c.275G>C (p.Trp92Ser). Patient C carried a mutation in SMN1 exon 6, which encodes a YG-box; c.819_820insT (p.Thr274Tyrfs). We constructed plasmid expression vectors containing wild-type and mutant SMN1 cDNAs. After transfection of HeLa cells with the expression plasmids, RNA and protein were isolated and analyzed by reverse-transcription PCR and western blot analysis.

RESULTS

The abundance of wild-type and mutant SMN1 transcripts in HeLa cells was almost the same. However, western blot analysis showed lower levels of mutant SMN proteins compared with wild-type SMN. In mutant SMN proteins, it is noteworthy that the level of the p.Thr274Tyrfs mutant was much reduced compared with that of the p.Trp92Ser mutant.

CONCLUSIONS

SMN mutations may affect the stability and levels of the protein.

Different Stability and Proteasome-Mediated Degradation Rate of SMN Protein Isoforms

The key pathogenic steps leading to spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), a genetic disease characterized by selective motor neuron degeneration, are not fully clarified. The full-length SMN protein (FL-SMN), the main protein product of the disease gene SMN1, plays an established role in the cytoplasm in snRNP biogenesis ultimately leading to mRNA splicing within the nucleus. It is also involved in the mRNA axonal transport. However, to what extent the impairment of these two SMN functions contributes to SMA pathogenesis remains unknown. A shorter SMN isoform, axonal-SMN or a-SMN, with more specific axonal localization, has been discovered, but whether it might act in concert with FL-SMN in SMA pathogenesis is not known. As a first step in defining common or divergent intracellular roles of FL-SMN vs a-SMN proteins, we here characterized the turn-over of both proteins and investigated which pathway contributed to a-SMN degradation. We performed real time western blot and confocal immunofluorescence analysis in easily controllable in vitro settings. We analyzed co-transfected NSC34 and HeLa cells and cell clones stably expressing both a-SMN and FL-SMN proteins after specific blocking of transcript or protein synthesis and inhibition of known intracellular degradation pathways. Our data indicated that whereas the stability of both FL-SMN and a-SMN transcripts was comparable, the a-SMN protein was characterized by a much shorter half-life than FL-SMN. In addition, as already demonstrated for FL-SMN, the Ub/proteasome pathway played a major role in the a-SMN protein degradation. We hypothesize that the faster degradation rate of a-SMN vs FL-SMN is related to the protection provided by the protein complex in which FL-SMN is assembled. The diverse a-SMN vs FL-SMN C-terminus may dictate different protein interactions and complex formation explaining the different localization and role in the neuronal compartment, and the lower expression and stability of a-SMN.