Initial Treatment for Nonsyndromic Early-Life Epilepsy: An Unexpected Consensus

Levetiracetam, from broad-spectrum use to precision prescription: A narrative review and expert opinion

Levetiracetam (LEV) is an antiseizure medication (ASM) whose mechanism of action involves the modulation of neurotransmitters release through binding to the synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A. It is a broad-spectrum ASM displaying favorable pharmacokinetic and tolerability profiles. Since its introduction in 1999, it has been widely prescribed, becoming the first-line treatment for numerous epilepsy syndromes and clinical scenarios. However, this might have resulted in overuse. Increasing evidence, including the recently published SANAD II trials, suggests that other ASMs are reasonable therapeutic options for generalized and focal epilepsies. Not infrequently, these ASMs show better safety and effectiveness profiles compared to LEV (partially due to the latter's well-known cognitive and behavioral adverse effects, present in up to 20% of patients). Moreover, it has been shown that the underlying etiology of epilepsy is significantly linked to ASMs response in particular scenarios, highlighting the importance of an etiology-based ASM choice. In the case of LEV, it has demonstrated an optimal effectiveness in Alzheimer's disease, Down syndrome, and PCDH19-related epilepsies whereas, in other etiologies such as malformations of cortical development, it may show negligible effects. This narrative review analyzes the current evidence related to the use of LEV for the treatment of seizures. Illustrative clinical scenarios and practical decision-making approaches are also addressed, therefore aiming to define a rational use of this ASM.

Surgical Treatments for Epilepsies in Children Aged 1-36 Months: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Early life epilepsies (epilepsies in children 1-36 months old) are common and may be refractory to antiseizure medications. We summarize findings of a systematic review commissioned by the American Epilepsy Society to assess evidence and identify evidence gaps for surgical treatments for epilepsy in children aged 1-36 months without infantile spasms.

METHODS

EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from 1/1/1999 to 8/19/21. We included studies reporting data on children aged 1 month to ≤36 months undergoing surgical interventions or neurostimulation for epilepsy and enrolling ≥10 patients per procedure. We excluded studies of infants with infantile spasms or status epilepticus. For effectiveness outcomes (seizure freedom, seizure frequency), studies were required to report follow-up at ≥ 12 weeks. For harm outcomes, no minimum follow-up was required. Outcomes for all epilepsy types, regardless of etiology, were reported together.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies (in 19 articles) met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen prestudies/poststudies reported on efficacy, and 12 studies addressed harms. Surgeries were performed from 1979 to 2020. Seizure freedom for infants undergoing hemispherectomy/hemispherotomy ranged from 7% to 76% at 1 year after surgery. For nonhemispheric surgeries, seizure freedom ranged from 40% to 70%. For efficacy, we concluded low strength of evidence (SOE) suggests some infants achieve seizure freedom after epilepsy surgery. Over half of infants undergoing hemispherectomy/hemispherotomy achieved a favorable outcome (Engel I or II, International League Against Epilepsy I to IV, or >50% seizure reduction) at follow-up of >1 year, although studies had key limitations. Surgical mortality was rare for functional hemispherectomy/hemispherotomy and nonhemispheric resections. Low SOE suggests postoperative hydrocephalus is uncommon for infants undergoing nonhemispheric procedures for epilepsy.

DISCUSSION

Although existing evidence remains sparse and low quality, some infants achieve seizure freedom after surgery and ≥50% achieve favorable outcomes. Future prospective studies in this age group are needed. In addition to seizure outcomes, studies should evaluate other important outcomes (developmental outcomes, quality of life [QOL], sleep, functional performance, and caregiver QOL).

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021220352) on March 5, 2021.

Pharmacologic and Dietary Treatments for Epilepsies in Children Aged 1-36 Months: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Early life epilepsies are common and often debilitating, but no evidence-based management guidelines exist outside of those for infantile spasms. We conducted a systematic review of the effectiveness and harms of pharmacologic and dietary treatments for epilepsy in children aged 1-36 months without infantile spasms.

METHODS

We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library for studies published from January 1, 1999, to August 19, 2021. Using prespecified criteria, we identified studies reporting data on children aged 1-36 months receiving pharmacologic or dietary treatments for epilepsy. We did not require that studies report etiology-specific data. We excluded studies of neonates, infantile spasms, and status epilepticus. We included studies administering 1 of 29 pharmacologic treatments and/or 1 of 5 dietary treatments reporting effectiveness outcomes at ≥ 12 weeks. We reviewed the full text to find any subgroup analyses of children aged 1-36 months.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies met inclusion criteria (6 randomized studies, 2 nonrandomized comparative studies, and 15 prestudies/poststudies). All conclusions were rated low strength of evidence. Levetiracetam leads to seizure freedom in some infants (32% and 66% in studies reporting seizure freedom), but data on 6 other medications were insufficient to permit conclusions about effectiveness (topiramate, lamotrigine, phenytoin, vigabatrin, rufinamide, and stiripentol). Three medications (levetiracetam, topiramate, and lamotrigine) were rarely discontinued because of adverse effects, and severe events were rare. For diets, the ketogenic diet leads to seizure freedom in some infants (rates 12%-37%), and both the ketogenic diet and modified Atkins diet reduce average seizure frequency, but reductions are greater with the ketogenic diet (1 RCT reported a 71% frequency reduction at 6 months for ketogenic diet vs only a 28% reduction for the modified Atkins diet). Dietary harms were not well-reported.

DISCUSSION

Little high-quality evidence exists on pharmacologic and dietary treatments for early life epilepsies. Future research should isolate how treatments contribute to outcomes, conduct etiology-specific analyses, and report patient-centered outcomes such as hospitalization, neurodevelopment, functional performance, sleep quality, and patient and caregiver quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021220352) on March 5, 2021.

Levetiracetam Prophylaxis for Children Admitted With Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic antiseizure medications (ASMs) for pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) are understudied. We evaluated clinical and radiographic features that inform prescription of ASMs for pediatric TBI. We hypothesized that despite a lack of evidence, levetiracetam is the preferred prophylactic ASM but that prophylaxis is inconsistently prescribed.

METHODS

This retrospective study assessed children admitted with TBI from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. TBI severity was defined using Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores. Two independent neuroradiologists reviewed initial head computed tomography and brain magnetic resonance imaging. Fisher exact tests and descriptive and regression analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Among 167 children with TBI, 44 (26%) received ASM prophylaxis. All 44 (100%) received levetiracetam. Prophylaxis was more commonly prescribed for younger children, those with neurosurgical intervention, and abnormal neuroimaging (particularly intraparenchymal hematoma) (odds ratio = 10.3, confidence interval 1.8 to 58.9), or GCS ≤12. Six children (13.6%), all on ASM, developed early posttraumatic seizures (EPTSs). Of children with GCS ≤12, four of 17 (23.5%) on levetiracetam prophylaxis developed EPTSs, higher than the reported rate for phenytoin.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some studies suggest it may be inferior to phenytoin, levetiracetam was exclusively used for EPTS prophylaxis. Intraparenchymal hematoma >1 cm was the single neuroimaging feature associated with ASM prophylaxis regardless of the GCS score. Yet these trends are not equivalent to optimal evidence-based management. We still observed important variability in neuroimaging characteristics and TBI severity for children on prophylaxis. Thus, further study of ASM prophylaxis and prevention of pediatric EPTSs is warranted.

Potential induction of epileptic spasms by nonselective voltage-gated sodium channel blockade: Interaction with etiology

PURPOSE

Epileptic spasms are often preceded by focal (or multifocal) seizures. Based on a series of case reports suggesting that carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine may induce epileptic spasms, we set out to rigorously evaluate the potential association between exposure to voltage-gated sodium channel blockade and latency to epileptic spasms.

METHODS

We identified 50 cases (children with focal seizures and evolution to epileptic spasms) and 50 controls (children with focal seizures without evolution to epileptic spasms). For each patient, we reviewed all sequential neurology encounters between onset of epilepsy and emergence of epileptic spasms. For each encounter we recorded seizure-frequency and all anti-seizure therapy exposures. Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, we evaluated the association between voltage-gated sodium channel exposure (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lacosamide, or phenytoin) and latency to epileptic spasms onset, with adjustment for etiology and seizure-frequency.

RESULTS

Latency to epileptic spasms onset was independently associated with exposure to sodium channel blockade (hazard ratio = 2.4; 95% CI 1.1-5.2; P = 0.03) and high-risk etiology (hazard ratio = 2.8; 95% CI 1.5-5.1; P = 0.001). With assessment for interaction between sodium channel blockade and etiology, we identified an estimated 7-fold increased risk of epileptic spasms with the combination of sodium channel blockade and high-risk etiology (hazard ratio = 7.0, 95% CI 2.5-19.8; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that voltage-gated sodium channel blockade may induce epileptic spasms among children at risk on the basis of etiology. Further study is warranted to replicate these findings, ascertain possible drug- and dose-specific risks, and identify potential mechanisms of harm.

Epilepsy with myoclonic-atonic seizures (Doose syndrome): Clarification of diagnosis and treatment options through a large retrospective multicenter cohort

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy with myoclonic-atonic seizures (EMAS) is a rare childhood onset epileptic encephalopathy. There is no clear consensus for recommended treatments, and pharmacoresistance is common. To better assess the clinical phenotype, most effective treatment, and determinants of cognitive and seizure outcomes, three major pediatric epilepsy centers combined data, creating the largest cohort of patients with EMAS ever studied to date.

METHODS

Authors performed a retrospective chart review of patients with EMAS who received care at the authors' institutions.

RESULTS

A total of 166 children were identified. Global developmental delay (>1 domain) was present in 2% of children at onset and 49% during the course of the disease. Afebrile seizures occurred after the age of 2 years in 88%, generalized tonic-clonic seizures in 60%, and drop attack or myoclonic seizures in 30%. At onset, electroencephalography (EEG) found 28% normal, background slowing in 20%, and epileptiform discharges or seizures in 69%. Subsequent EEG found slowing in 62% and discharges or seizures in 90%. Response (>50% seizure reduction) to the first three antiseizure drugs (ASDs) was 26% (levetiracetam, 17%; valproic acid, 31%; other ASDs combined, 26%). Diet therapy was used as a second or third therapy in 19% and ultimately used in 57%; response was 79%, significantly greater than the first three ASDs (P = .005, χ² ). Seizure freedom occurred in 57% and was less likely in the case of persistent global developmental delays (P < .001), seizure recorded on subsequent EEGs (P = .027), and failure to respond to diet therapy (P = .005). Development was normal in 47%, and 12% had delays in one domain, which was less likely in the case of global developmental delay after epilepsy onset (P < .001) and failure to achieve seizure freedom (P < .001).

SIGNIFICANCE

This large cohort of children with EMAS clarifies areas of variability in practice. Diet therapy is by far the most effective treatment; failure to respond was associated with failure to attain seizure freedom. This therapy should be used early in the treatment in EMAS. This study also identified a bidirectional link between cognitive and seizure outcomes.

High-Dose Levetiracetam for Neonatal Seizures: A Retrospective Review

BACKGROUND

Neonatal seizures are frequently encountered in the neonatal intensive care unit and may be associated with serious long-term neurological sequelae. Response to treatment continues to be modest, and treatment guidelines remain unclear. The use of levetiracetam has been on the rise in the past several years due to its favorable safety profile in the face of limited data on its efficacy and optimal dosing regimens. Unlike the older age groups, the benefit of escalating to high-dose levetiracetam of 80-100 mg/kg/day in neonates not responding to the standard used dosing regimen (40-60 mg/kg/day) is not studied. We sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of levetiracetam escalation to high dose regimens for neonatal seizures.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review over a 7-year period was conducted at the American University of Beirut to identify neonates with electrographically proven seizures treated with levetiracetam. Data was collected on electroclinical seizure characteristics, underlying etiology, seizure control, other anti-seizure medications, and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Electronic chart review revealed a total of 15 neonates with electrographically confirmed seizures treated with levetiracetam, with escalation to high doses in seven. As a first line drug, levetiracetam monotherapy terminated seizures in six out 10 neonates, two of whom had complete seizure cessation only after escalation to high doses of 80 or 100 mg/kg/day. When used in combination with other anti-seizure medications, four out of five neonates achieved complete seizure cessation upon escalation to high doses of levetiracetam. No adverse effects were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

In neonates not responding to the standard used levetiracetam doses, incremental increases to 80-100 mg/kg/day may be considered. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the promising role of such high dosing regimens, and to better elucidate the role of levetiracetam in neonatal seizures.

Clinical Use and Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Absence Epilepsies

BACKGROUND

Levetiracetam is prescribed for a broad spectrum of seizure types but does not have a specific indication for absence epilepsy. We hypothesized that levetiracetam is commonly prescribed for children with absence epilepsies and evaluated the efficacy of this medication for absence epilepsy treatment in clinical practice. We also hypothesized that electroencephalographic (EEG) findings could help predict levetiracetam efficacy.

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of all patients treated for new-onset absence epilepsies at our pediatric neurology clinic between January 2011 and January 2016. Among 158 children diagnosed with absence epilepsies, 72 were treated with levetiracetam.

RESULTS

Levetiracetam was discontinued in 74% (n = 53/72) because of incomplete seizure control (59%, n = 35/72) and/or intolerable side effects (41%, n = 24/72) after a median 8.5 months (interquartile range 2, 17 months). Among patients for whom levetiracetam was effective, 44% (n = 8/18) had polyspikes on their initial EEG, versus 27% (n = 14/52) of patients for whom levetiracetam was discontinued ( P = .17). The maximal prescribed dose was lower for children in whom levetiracetam was effective (29 ± 13 mg/kg/d) than those for whom levetiracetam failed (42 ± 20 mg/kg/d; P = .005).

CONCLUSION

In routine clinical practice, levetiracetam is often chosen for patients with absence seizures. However, only about one-quarter of children with absence epilepsy in this study became seizure free with levetiracetam. When effective, levetiracetam can control absence epilepsy at a relatively low dose. Lack of seizure control requiring continued dose escalation should prompt early consideration of a therapeutic medication transition.

Medications for Early Life Epilepsy: Evidence Versus Experience?

Comparative Effectiveness of Levetiracetam vs Phenobarbital for Infantile Epilepsy

Grinspan ZM, Shellhaas RA, Coryell J, Sullivan JE, Wirrell EC, Mytinger JR, Gaillard WD, Kossoff EH, Valencia I, Knupp KG, Wusthoff C, Keator C, Ryan N, Loddenkemper T, Chu CJ, Novotny EJ Jr, Millichap J, Berg AT. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Apr 1;172(4):352-360. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5211.

Importance: More than half of infants with new-onset epilepsy have electroencephalographic and clinical features that do not conform to known electroclinical syndromes (ie, nonsyndromic epilepsy). Levetiracetam and phenobarbital are the most commonly prescribed medications for epilepsy in infants, but their comparative effectiveness is unknown. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of levetiracetam versus phenobarbital for nonsyndromic infantile epilepsy. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Early Life Epilepsy Study—a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study conducted from March 1, 2012, to April 30, 2015, in 17 US medical centers—enrolled infants with nonsyndromic epilepsy and a first afebrile seizure between 1 month and 1 year of age. Exposures: Use of levetiracetam or phenobarbital as initial monotherapy within 1 year of the first seizure. Main Outcomes and Measures: The binary outcome was freedom from monotherapy failure at 6 months, defined as no second prescribed antiepileptic medication and freedom from seizures beginning within 3 months of initiation of treatment. Outcomes were adjusted for demographics, epilepsy characteristics, and neurologic history, as well as for observable selection bias using propensity score weighting and for within-center correlation using generalized estimating equations. Results: Of the 155 infants in the study (81 girls and 74 boys; median age, 4.7 months [interquartile range, 3.0-7.1 months]), those treated with levetiracetam (n = 117) were older at the time of the first seizure than those treated with phenobarbital (n = 38; median age, 5.2 months [interquartile range, 3.5-8.2 months] vs 3.0 months [interquartile range, 2.0-4.4 months]; P < .001). There were no other significant bivariate differences. Infants treated with levetiracetam were free from monotherapy failure more often than those treated with phenobarbital (47 [40.2%] vs 6 [15.8%]; P = .01). The superiority of levetiracetam over phenobarbital persisted after adjusting for covariates, observable selection bias, and within-center correlation (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-16; number needed to treat, 3.5 [95% CI, 1.7-60]). Conclusions and Relevance: Levetiracetam may have superior effectiveness compared to phenobarbital for initial monotherapy of nonsyndromic epilepsy in infants. If 100 infants who received phenobarbital were instead treated with levetiracetam, 44 would be free from monotherapy failure instead of 16 by the estimates in this study. Randomized clinical trials are necessary to confirm these findings.

Getting serious about the early-life epilepsies

Early-life epilepsies represent a group of many individually rare and often complex developmental brain disorders associated with lifelong devastating consequences and high risk for early mortality. The quantity and quality of evidence needed to guide the evaluation and treatment to optimize outcomes of affected children is minimal; most children are treated within an evidence-free practice zone based solely on anecdote and lore. The remarkable advances in diagnostics and therapeutics are implemented haphazardly with no systematic effort to understand their effects and value. This stands in stark contrast to the evidence-rich practice of the Children's Oncology Group, where standard of care treatments are identified through rigorous, multicenter research studies, and the vast majority of patients are treated on protocols developed from that research. As a consequence, overall mortality for childhood cancers has declined from ∼90% in the 1950s to ∼20% today. The situations of these 2 rare disease specialties are contrasted, and some suggestions for moving early-life epilepsy onto a fast track for success are offered. Chief amongst these is that early-life epilepsy should be treated with the same urgency as pediatric cancer. The best diagnostics and evidence-based treatments should be used in a systematic fashion right from the start, not after the child and family have been subjected to the ravages of the disorder for months or years. This will require unity and cooperation among physicians, researchers, and institutions across state and national borders.

Comparative Effectiveness of Levetiracetam vs Phenobarbital for Infantile Epilepsy

IMPORTANCE

More than half of infants with new-onset epilepsy have electroencephalographic and clinical features that do not conform to known electroclinical syndromes (ie, nonsyndromic epilepsy). Levetiracetam and phenobarbital are the most commonly prescribed medications for epilepsy in infants, but their comparative effectiveness is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of levetiracetam vs phenobarbital for nonsyndromic infantile epilepsy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The Early Life Epilepsy Study-a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study conducted from March 1, 2012, to April 30, 2015, in 17 US medical centers-enrolled infants with nonsyndromic epilepsy and a first afebrile seizure between 1 month and 1 year of age.

EXPOSURES

Use of levetiracetam or phenobarbital as initial monotherapy within 1 year of the first seizure.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The binary outcome was freedom from monotherapy failure at 6 months, defined as no second prescribed antiepileptic medication and freedom from seizures beginning within 3 months of initiation of treatment. Outcomes were adjusted for demographics, epilepsy characteristics, and neurologic history, as well as for observable selection bias using propensity score weighting and for within-center correlation using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Of the 155 infants in the study (81 girls and 74 boys; median age, 4.7 months [interquartile range, 3.0-7.1 months]), those treated with levetiracetam (n = 117) were older at the time of the first seizure than those treated with phenobarbital (n = 38) (median age, 5.2 months [interquartile range, 3.5-8.2 months] vs 3.0 months [interquartile range, 2.0-4.4 months]; P < .001). There were no other significant bivariate differences. Infants treated with levetiracetam were free from monotherapy failure more often than those treated with phenobarbital (47 [40.2%] vs 6 [15.8%]; P = .01). The superiority of levetiracetam over phenobarbital persisted after adjusting for covariates, observable selection bias, and within-center correlation (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.1-16; number needed to treat, 3.5 [95% CI, 1.7-60]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Levetiracetam may have superior effectiveness compared with phenobarbital for initial monotherapy of nonsyndromic epilepsy in infants. If 100 infants who received phenobarbital were instead treated with levetiracetam, 44 would be free from monotherapy failure instead of 16 by the estimates in this study. Randomized clinical trials are necessary to confirm these findings.