Position Statement of the International Network for Child and Family Centered Care: Child and Family Centred Care during the COVID19 Pandemic

A consensus statement on child and family health during the COVID-19 pandemic and recommendations for post-pandemic recovery and re-build

Introduction

As health systems struggled to respond to the catastrophic effects of SARS-CoV-2, infection prevention and control measures significantly impacted on the delivery of non-COVID children's and family health services. The prioritisation of public health measures significantly impacted supportive relationships, revealed their importance for both mental and physical health and well-being. Drawing on findings from an expansive national collaboration, and with the well-being of children and young people in mind, we make recommendations here for post-pandemic recovery and re-build.

Methods

This consensus statement is derived from a cross-disciplinary collaboration of experts. Working together discursively, we have synthesised evidence from collaborative research in child and family health during the COVID-19 pandemic. We have identified and agreed priorities areas for both action and learning, which we present as recommendations for research, healthcare practice, and policy.

Results

The synthesis led to immediate recommendations grouped around what to retain and what to remove from "pandemic" provision and what to reinstate from pre-pandemic, healthcare provision in these services. Longer-term recommendations for action were also made. Those relevant to children's well-being concern equity and relational healthcare.

Discussion

The documented evidence-base of the effects of the pandemic on children's and family services is growing, providing foundations for the post-pandemic recovery and re-setting of child and family health services and care provision. Recommendations contribute to services better aligning with the values of equity and relational healthcare, whilst providing wider consideration of care and support for children and families in usual vs. extra-ordinary health system shock circumstances.

Evaluation of the impact of family-centered care training on pediatric nurses' attitudes

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of structured Family-Centered Care training on pediatric nurses' attitudes toward Family-Centered Care.

METHODS

This quasi-experimental study utilized a pretest-posttest control group design with 140 pediatric nurses (70 intervention, 70 control). Conducted in public hospitals from March to August 2024, the intervention group received a four-week Family-Centered Care training. The Family-Centered Care Attitude Scale was used to measure attitudes, and data collection included a demographic data form administered both before the training and six weeks after its completion. Statistical analysis included t-tests and chi-square tests.

RESULTS

Nurses in the intervention group showed significant improvement in their attitudes toward Family-Centered Care after training, with higher posttest scores compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The control group showed no significant changes between pretest and posttest scores. These findings confirmed the hypothesis that Family-Centered Care training positively influences pediatric nurses' attitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

Structured Family-Centered Care training significantly improved pediatric nurses' attitudes toward Family-Centered Care, emphasizing the importance of innovative educational methods in promoting Family-Centered Care adoption in pediatric nursing.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Incorporating regular Family-Centered Care training into pediatric nursing practices can foster more Family-Centered Care approaches, improve patient and family satisfaction, and promote nurses' professional growth, ultimately enhancing the overall quality of care in pediatric settings.

"It's challenging but not impossible": Exploring clinical instructors' experiences of child and family centered care in clinical nursing education

BACKGROUND

Clinical instructors (CIs) assist student nurses within the context of their pediatric clinical education to assimilate into their new roles and develop their own clinical expertise. This involves acquisition of knowledge and skills including the adoption of Child and Family Centered Care (CFCC) principles.

AIMS

This study explored CIs experiences of CFCC in clinical settings by investigating their views and perceptions of its implementation within the clinical education process.

METHODS

A mixed-method approach was used. A focus group was employed to collect data from 7 participants recruited from one faculty of nursing. A questionnaire was also completed by 5 participants to enrich the data collection process. Descriptive statistics used to describe their perceived importance of CFCC, and conventional content analysis was used to organize data and identify themes.

RESULTS

While quantitative responses revealed discrepant findings, qualitative data resulted in three themes 1) Clinical instructors (CIs) know CFCC, acknowledge its importance, and take action for that 2) Facilitators and challenges of adopting CFCC in clinical education, and 3) CIs approaches to implement CFCC.

CONCLUSIONS

While CI's were able to facilitate the implementation of CFCC despite the barriers, their whole experience circulated around external factors including the clinical environment and its role in facilitating or hindering the educational process including CFCC implementation.

IMPLICATIONS

Program administrators should address clinical instructors concerns regarding barriers to CFCC implementation in clinical practice including the evaluation process. They should also ensure appropriate training is provided for healthcare professionals to enable them to effectively engage in CFCC.

Family-Centered Care and Delayed or Missed Pediatric Preventive Care due to the COVID-19 Pandemic

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between family-centered care and its components with delayed or missed preventive care due to the COVID-9 pandemic among US children.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study using nationally representative data from the 2021 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH). Children were eligible if they received health care services in the past 12 months (n = 42,649; 79.3%). We excluded children with missing data, for a final sample of 40,511 (93.7% of the eligible sample). Children were deemed to have received family-centered care if caregivers responded "always" or "usually" to all five measures of family-centered care. Poisson regression was used to ascertain weighted prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Predisposing, enabling, and need factors of health care services use were evaluated as potential confounders.

RESULTS

Approximately 86.7% of children received family-centered care during the pandemic, with significant racial and ethnic differences, findings consistent with pre-pandemic data. In multivariable analyses adjusted for the child's race and age, family-centered care was associated with a 30% reduced likelihood of delayed or missed preventive care (95% CI: 0.64-0.78). Individual components of family-centered care were associated with a 26%-43% reduced likelihood of delayed or missed preventive care.

CONCLUSIONS

Family-centered care and its components were associated with a reduced likelihood of delayed or missed pediatric preventive care. Our findings highlight the important role of health care providers in curbing the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric preventive care utilization and emphasize the need to expand family-centered care among racial and ethnic minority groups.

Preterm birth and stillbirth during COVID-19 pandemic in Bihor County/Romania

Background

International studies have reported conflicting data about the effects of COVID-19 pandemic policy measures on maternal and neonatal health. A major impact was reported on stillbirth and prematurity. The published literature suggests that the economic setting influenced the effects of imposed mitigation measures with a more severe effect in low-income countries.

Objectives

Our objective is to compare pregnancy outcomes at the only tertiary Maternity Hospital in Bihor County-Romania before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to observe and document differences in perinatal outcomes across these periods, without inferring direct causation related to the pandemic or its associated restrictions.

Materials and methods

We used data from the registries of Public Health Services Bihor to conduct a retrospective cohort analysis of preterm births and stillbirths during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bihor County, Romania. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between the pandemic period (March 2020-February 2022) to the corresponding historical pre-COVID-19 period (March 2018-February 2020). Maternal socio-demographic variables and neonatal characteristics of these periods were also examined.

Results

The COVID-19 pandemic period was associated with an increase in the stillbirth rate (RR: 1.53, 95% CI, 1.05-2.23). Preterm birth was significantly impacted during this period and showed changes when analyzing gestational age (RR: 0.88, 95% CI, 0.79-0.96) or birth weight (RR: 0.91, 95% CI, 0.82-1.00). The main cause of stillbirth was intrauterine asphyxia due to placental causes (67.6%) or cord pathology (12.6%), the most frequently encountered maternal pathology was cardiovascular (28.3%) or infectious (21.7%). Our study revealed no significant changes in terms of maternal and neonatal characteristics during the two-year pandemic period.

Conclusions

Lockdown restrictions in Bihor County, Romania were associated with an increase in stillbirths, whilst preterm birth rate decreased. This raises concerns about whether pandemic policy measures may have led to a failure in identifying and offering proper care for pregnant women who were more likely to experience an antepartum loss. Further studies across the globe are needed in order to integrate comparable data that will help develop adequate protocols and policies for protecting maternal and child health during the next pandemic that will follow.

The Concept of Child-Centred Care in Healthcare: A Scoping Review

Although child-centred care is increasingly referred to within the nursing literature, a clear definition of child-centred care and clarity around the concept is yet to be achieved. The objectives of this review were to examine the following: (1) What constitutes the concept of child-centred care in healthcare? (2) How has the concept of child-centred care developed? (3) What is the applicability of child-centred care and what are its limitations? (4) How does the concept of child-centred care benefit and inform children's healthcare? In total, 2984 papers were imported for screening, and, following the removal of duplicates and screening, 21 papers were included in the scoping review. The findings suggest that child-centred care is an emerging, ambiguous poorly defined concept; no clear consensus exists about what constitutes child-centred care. Although it seems antithetical to argue against child-centred care, little robust evidence was identified that demonstrates the impact and benefit of child-centred care. If child-centred care is to be a sustainable, convincing model to guide practice and compete with other models of care, it needs to establish robust evidence of its effectiveness, the impact on children and their families, as well as the wider impacts on the healthcare system.

The long-term impact of COVID-19 on nursing: An e-panel discussion from the International Network for Child and Family Centred Care

AIM

To explore the International Network for Child and Family Centred Care (INCFCC) members' experiences and views on the long-term impact of COVID-19 on the nursing workforce.

BACKGROUND

On the 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. While some countries adopted a herd immunity approach, others imposed stricter measures to reduce the transmission of the virus. Hospitals in some countries faced an avalanche of extremely sick admissions, whereas others experienced an early surge in cases or were able to control the spread.

DESIGN

Discursive paper.

METHODS

A web-based survey was e-mailed to 63 INCFCC members from 28 March to 30 April 2022, as an invitation to share their experience concerning the long-term impact of COVID-19 on their role as a nurse educator, clinician or researcher.

RESULTS

Sixteen members responded, and the responses were grouped under the themes stress and anxiety, safe staffing and pay, doing things differently, impact on research, impact on teaching and learning, impact on clinical practice, nursing made visible and lessons for the future.

CONCLUSION

The INCFCC members provided their views and highlighted the impact on their role in nursing education, administration, research and/or practice. This discussion of international perspectives on the similarities and differences imposed by COVID-19 found that the impact was wide-ranging and prolonged. The overarching theme revealed the resilience of the participating members in the face of COVID-19.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This study highlights the importance of all areas of nursing, be it in academia or in clinical practice, to work together to learn from the present and to plan for the future. Future work should focus on supporting organizational and personal resiliency and effective interventions to support the nursing workforce both during a disaster and in the recovery phase. Nursing workforce resilience in the face of COVID-19.

The barriers to family-centered care in the pediatric rehabilitation ward: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Family-centered care (FCC) is one of the fundamental principles of care provision to children with disability (CWD). It is based on the collaboration of healthcare providers, patients, and families. However, there is limited information about the barriers to FCC in pediatric rehabilitation settings in Iran. This study aimed at exploring the barriers to FCC in the pediatric rehabilitation ward.

METHODS

This descriptive qualitative study was conducted in 2022. Participants were nine rehabilitation staff and twelve mothers of hospitalized CWD purposively selected from the pediatric rehabilitation ward of hospital Rofeideh, Tehran, Iran. Rehabilitation staff were three nurses, a head nurse, a nursing manager, a medical specialist, a social worker, a physical therapist, and an occupational therapist. Eleven semi-structured interviews and three focus group discussions were conducted for data collection, and conventional content analysis proposed by Graneheim and Lundman (2004) was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

The three main categories of the barriers to FCC in the pediatric rehabilitation ward were family-related barriers (subcategories: knowledge about child rehabilitation, sociocultural background, and participation), staff-related barriers (subcategories: knowledge, ethical concerns, and collaboration), and organizational barriers (subcategories: factors related to FCC policies, managerial factors, environmental factors, and factors related to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic).

CONCLUSION

The barriers to FCC in the pediatric rehabilitation ward are very diverse due to the long-term course of child disability and long-term interaction of families with rehabilitation centers. Data collection from both families and rehabilitation staff helped acquire an in-depth understanding about these barriers. More in-depth explorations of family-related barriers such as sociocultural factors are essential to determine the reasons for family resistance to healthcare providers' recommendations to develop more effective care plans.

The perceptions and performance of family-centered care among pediatric nurses at a children's hospital in South Korea: a descriptive study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine pediatric hospital nurses' perceptions and performance of family-centered care.

METHODS

A descriptive study design was used. This study surveyed 162 nurses who worked at a single tertiary children's hospital in South Korea. The modified Family-Centered Care Scale was used to assess nurses' perceptions and performance of family-centered care. Barriers to the implementation of family-centered care were described in an open-ended format.

RESULTS

Pediatric hospital nurses had a higher score for perceptions (mean score=4.07) than for performance (mean score=3.77). The collaboration subscale had the lowest scores for both perceptions and performance. The perceptions of family-centered care differed significantly according to the nurses' clinical career in the pediatric unit and familiarity with family-centered care, while performance differed according to clinical career only. Perceptions and performance were positively correlated (r=.594, p<.001). Barriers to implementation included a shortage of nursing personnel, a lack of time, and the absence of a family-centered care system.

CONCLUSION

To improve the performance of family-centered care, nurses' perceptions of family-centered care should be improved by offering education programs and active support, including sufficient staffing, and establishing systems within hospitals.

Supporting Children and Families in Medical Settings: Insights from Child Life Specialists During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Medical settings can be frightening and stressful places for pediatric patients and their families. During the COVID-19 pandemic fear and anxiety associated with receiving medical care increased as medical facilities dramatically altered the way they functioned in attempts to stop the spread of the virus. Certified Child Life Specialists (CCLSs) are medical professionals who provide psychosocial support for pediatric patients and their families by helping them understand and cope with medical procedures and the medical environment. In this role, CCLSs are likely to have important insights into the experiences and needs of pediatric patients and their families during COVID-19. Using a mixed-methods design, 101 CCLSs completed an online survey and 15 participated in follow-up interviews examining their experiences with and observations of children and families in medical environments during the pandemic. Participants emphasized a need to maintain a focus on child- and family-centered care for the well-being of patients and their families. While recognizing the need to socially distance to limit the spread of COVID, participants expressed concern about restrictive policies that did not balance the physical and mental health needs of patients and families. Participants also discussed the important role of child life services during the pandemic and the unique and multifaceted contributions CCLSs made to support patients, families, other medical professionals, and communities. Recommendations for supporting children and families in medical environments moving forward are discussed in light of lessons learned during the pandemic.

Exploring the impact of the COVID-19 environment on nursing delivery of family-centred care in a paediatric hospital

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To understand how the pandemic environment impacted the delivery of FCC of children and families from a nursing perspective in a major tertiary paediatric hospital.

BACKGROUND

Family-centred care (FCC) is a well-established framework to promote parental involvement in every aspect of a child's hospitalization, however, rules and restrictions in place during the COVID-19 pandemic affected the ways in which Family-centred Care could be delivered in practice.

DESIGN

This is a qualitative exploratory descriptive study to elicit the perspective of paediatric nurses delivering care to children in a hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia.

METHODS

Nurses from all subspecialties in a tertiary paediatric hospital were invited to participate in virtual focus groups to discuss their experience of delivering FCC during the COVID-19 pandemic. Focus groups were recorded and transcribed, then analysed using Framework Analysis.

RESULTS

Nineteen nurses participated across seven focus groups during June and July 2020. The four themes-Advocating with empathy, Enabling communication, Responding with flexibility, and Balancing competing considerations-and the eight subthemes that were generated, outline how nurses deliver FCC, and how these FCC actions were impacted by the COVID-19 environment and the related hospital restrictions.

CONCLUSION

This study documents the experiences, resilience and resourcefulness of paediatric nurses in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic as well as moving Family-centred Care from a theoretical framework into a practical reality.

IMPACT

The findings from this study should inform consideration of the impacts of public health policies during infectious disease outbreaks moving forward. In addition by describing the core actions of Family-centred Care, this study has implications for educational interventions on how to translate FCC theory into practice. No public or patient contribution as this study explored nursing perceptions only.

Characteristics and perceptions of telerehabilitation consultations by neuropediatric physical therapists during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic brought a strong discussion about telerehabilitation, especially in countries where its practice was not allowed previous the pandemic. In the neuropediatric rehabilitation field evidence of the effectiveness of this modality of assistance and data about provider and family’s perceptions are scarce. Objective: To evaluate the characteristics of telerehabilitation physical therapy consultations for children with neurological diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic and report the perceptions of physical therapists about this modality of assistance. Methods: An online survey was created and administered to Brazilian neuropediatric physical therapists. The survey consisted of demographics data, questions about the characteristics of telerehabilitation consultations, and physical therapists’ perception of telerehabilitation assistance. Results: From July to September 2020, 394 physical therapists responded to the questionnaire. The most of them took 21 to 30 minutes per telemonitoring session (26.9%), offered one session per week (61.0%), and used electronic messages as the main method of delivery (39.9%). The main difficulty reported was caregivers’ lack of understanding about handling during sessions (41.2%) and problems with internet connection (16.7%). Additionally, most of them reported that it is highly important important to provide healthcare via telerehabilitation to the economically disadvantaged. Conclusion: The findings of this study provide insight into the complex and challenging process of telerehabilitation assistance during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the reported challenges, telerehabilitation can be an opportunity to better understand children’s activities and participation in home context.

(Re)'Thinking' family in nursing care in pandemic times

AIM

This study aimed to identify which strategies are being adopted to deal with family restrictions in health units and assess nurses' perceptions of including families in nursing care during the current pandemic.

BACKGROUND

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, health organisations limited access for visitors.

INTRODUCTION

Family centred care needs to be guaranteed, and alternatives for face-to-face interaction should be fostered. Therefore, there is an urgent need to rethink the family in nursing care during a pandemic.

METHODS

We conducted a descriptive exploratory mixed-method study in Portugal using an electronic questionnaire. The study included 192 nurses recruited using a non-probabilistic convenience sample. The study was reported using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 41.1% of participants (n = 79) reported that visits to their services were not authorised, and 66.7% (n = 128) reported resorting to video calls because of the restrictions imposed. Regarding attitude assessment, the average score of the scale was 77.9 (SD = 10.0), ranging between 26 and 98. When analysing the different dimensions of the 'Families' Importance in Nursing Care - Nurses Attitudes' scale, family data stand out as a burden.

CONCLUSION

Although a large percentage of participants had a positive attitude towards families and tried to find strategies to maintain family centred care, many nurses still considered the family as a burden. The current COVID-19 pandemic may have aggravated this perception. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE, NURSING POLICY AND HEALTH POLICY: The continued implementation of family centred nursing practice is essential for child-well-being, including during the current pandemic. Therefore, having intervention policies with alternative forms of care is highly recommended.