Nasolacrimal Duct Probing under Topical Anesthesia for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Taiwan

Assessment of Office-Based Probing with Dacryoendoscopy for Treatment of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Retrospective Study

We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of office-based probing with dacryoendoscopy under local anesthesia for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO). This single-institution study retrospectively reviewed data on 72 eyes of 64 consecutive children (38 boys, 43 eyes; 26 girls, 29 eyes), aged between 6 and 17 (mean age: 10.0 ± 2.7) months with suspected CNLDO, from July 2016 to February 2022. These patients underwent probing with dacryoendoscopy under local anesthesia. CNLDO was diagnosed clinically based on the presence of epiphora and sticky eyes due to mucous discharge commencing within the first 3 months of life, increased tear meniscus height, and fluorescein dye disappearance test results. A total of 63 of the 72 eyes had narrowly defined CNLDO, and 9 eyes had other types of obstructions. The intervention success rate was 100% (63/63 eyes) for patients with typical CNLDO and 97.2% (70/72 eyes) for the entire study cohort. Moreover, CNLDO was classified into five types based on the features of the distal end of the nasolacrimal duct. Probing with dacryoendoscopy is safe and yields a high success rate in pediatric patients with CNLDO. This is the first study to assess the safety and efficacy of probing with dacryoendoscopy under local anesthesia in pediatric patients with CNLDO.

Age-Specific Outcomes of Conservative Approach and Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Purpose

Patients and Methods

Results

Conclusion

Office- or Facility-Based Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

PURPOSE

To review the published literature assessing the efficacy and safety of in-office probing compared with facility-based probing to treat congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO).

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted in March 2020 in the PubMed database with no date restrictions and limited to studies published in English and in the Cochrane Library database with no restrictions. The combined searches yielded 281 citations. Of these, 21 articles were deemed appropriate for inclusion in this assessment and assigned a level of evidence rating by the panel methodologist. Four articles were rated level I, 2 articles were rated level II, and 15 articles were rated level III.

RESULTS

Treatments consisted of observation, in-office nasolacrimal probing, or facility-based nasolacrimal probing. Success rates and complications or recurrences were recorded from 1 week to 6 months after surgery. Complete resolution of symptoms after surgery ranged from 66% to 95.6% for office-based procedures versus 50% to 97.7% for facility-based procedures. Level I evidence indicated that 66% of cases spontaneously resolved after 6 months of observation in infants between 6 and 10 months of age. Success rates for in-office probing were lower for bilateral than for unilateral NLDO (67% vs. 82%), whereas success rates were high in both unilateral (83%) and bilateral (82%) patients who underwent facility-based probing after 6 months of observation. Cost data did not indicate a definitive cost savings of either treatment method ($562 for in-office vs. $701 for facility-based, depending on cost models predicting spontaneous resolution rates at different ages). No serious adverse events with treatment or anesthesia were reported for either treatment method.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence supports the efficacy and safety of both in-office and facility-based surgery for congenital NLDO. However, treating bilateral NLDO in a facility setting may be better. Because a significant percentage of children achieved resolution spontaneously before 12 months of age, deferring treatment until 12 to 18 months of age is a reasonable option. Additional research may address symptom burden on families and the impact of anesthesia and emotional trauma of nonsedated office probings on patients and may explore further the cost of treatment for each treatment method.

Nasolacrimal Duct Probing for Young Children With Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstructions in China: A 10-Year Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To investigate the success rate of probing for young children with nasolacrimal duct obstructions and the risk factors involved.

METHODS

The medical records of 3,143 patients (3,928 eyes) who received nasolacrimal duct probing in southwest China were collected. These included delivery method, age and gender, preoperative treatments, anesthesia methods, probing procedure, and follow-up clinical records. Then the relationship between the success rates of the probing and a few probable risk factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Children delivered by eutocia were more likely than those delivered by cesarean section to have nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The total success rate of the probing was 85.2%. Patients older than 19 months had a lower completion rate compared with those younger than 1 year (P < .01). In the follow-up observations, the younger age groups were more likely to have higher success rates than the older ones (P < .05) using pairwise comparison. The success rates also had a significant relationship with the type of obstruction and older patients were more likely to have complex obstruction (odds ratio: 1.13, 95% confidence interval: 1.08 to 1.19, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This large-scale study proved several factors affect the success rate of nasolacrimal duct probing, and confirmed children delivered by eutocia were more likely to have nasolacrimal duct obstruction. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2019;56(6):365-372.].

Efficacy of Office-Based Nasolacrimal Duct Probing

PURPOSE

To analyze the efficacy of nasolacrimal duct probing conducted in the office for nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of 1,294 patients. Of those, 1,227 patients who underwent office-based nasolacrimal probings of the nasolacrimal duct at a single tertiary care center were included.

RESULTS

A total of 82 (6.7%) patients needed reprobing. Of the 82 patients who underwent a second procedure, 35 (43%) underwent a second in-office probing with a success rate of 77%. The 8 (22%) patients who failed the second in-office probing underwent probing and Crawford stent placement in the operating room and their symptoms resolved. For the 47 (57%) patients who failed the primary in-office probing and underwent operating room probing and stent placement, only 1 (2%) needed a second operating room probing and stent placement. Logistic regression analyses indicated an increased likelihood of needing a secondary procedure with increased age at the time of the first probing.

CONCLUSIONS

This large, retrospective analysis of office-based probings demonstrated a success rate of 93.3% with increased likelihood of not needing a second procedure with probing at a younger age. This study demonstrates an excellent success rate for in-office probings for patients both younger and older than 12 months. This not only shows a high rate of efficacy, but is also highly cost efficient when compared to primary probing in the operating room. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2019;56(1):50-54.].

Insights in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Introduction: Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction is one of the most common causes of epiphora in newborns and the main cause of this condition is the persistence of Hasner membrane. Several treatment options are available, like conservative treatment, probing, irrigation, or more complex techniques.

Objective: The objective of this paper is to discuss the efficiency of different treatment options addressing congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction based on trials reported in literature.

Methods: Clinical trials were identified on PubMed. The results were discussed regarding patient age, type of treatment and efficiency of the treatment.

Results: 41 trials were reviewed. The rate of resolution according to different treatment options was the following: conservative treatment 14.2-96%, probing 78-100%, irrigation 33-100%, silicon tube intubation 62-100%, inferior turbinate fracture 54.7-97%, balloon dacryocystoplasty 77%, endoscopic intranasal surgery 92.72%, and dacryocystorhinostomy 88.2-93.33%.

Conclusions: The first choice in uncomplicated cases should be a conservative treatment, which can be followed until the age of 1 year, while in complicated cases other solutions should be considered.

Abbreviations: CNDO = Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction, DCR = Dacryocystorhinostomy, MCI = Monocanalicular intubation, BCI = Bicanalicular intubation

Success Rates of Endoscopic-Assisted Probing Compared to Conventional Probing in Children 48 Months or Older

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the success rates of endoscopic-assisted probing compared to conventional probing in children 48 months or older.

METHODS

This retrospective study included children 48 months and older with CNLDO who underwent endoscopic-assisted probing or conventional probing between January 2011 to August 2015 at a tertiary eye care hospital in central Saudi Arabia. Probing was considered successful when signals of tearing or discharge disappeared and fluorescein dye disappearance test (FDDT) was normal. Demographic data, clinical features, intraoperative and postoperative variables were correlated to the success rate.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve children with CNLDO undergoing endoscopic-assisted (37 patients) or conventional (75 patients) probing were included. The success rates of endoscopic-assisted and conventional probing were 94.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 89.5-99.7] and 58.7% [95% (CI): 47.6-69.8], respectively. The success rate was higher with endoscopic probing, especially in older children.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic-assisted probing can achieve better outcomes to treat CNLDO, even in older children. The significantly higher success rates with endoscopic probing are likely due to the ability to observe and treat associated problems.

Success Rates of Conventional Versus Endoscope-Assisted Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children 12 Years and Younger

PURPOSE

To compare the success rates for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) treated with conventional probing versus endoscope-assisted probing.

METHODS

A retrospective nonrandomized comparison of the success rates in children (0 to 12 years) with CNLDO who underwent conventional probing or endoscope-assisted probing. Success was defined as absence of tearing or negative fluorescein dye disappearance test. Stent was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 270 patients with CNLDO comprised the study population. The mean age was 37 months in the conventional probing group and 48.5 months in the endoscope-assisted probing group. The subjective and objective success rates were 76.1% and 75.9%, respectively, in the conventional probing group and 95.7% and 95.7%, respectively, in the endoscope-assisted probing group. The success rates were higher for both methods in the endoscope-assisted probing group (P < .005). The success rate decreased in older children in the conventional probing group (100% < 6 months; 62.5% > 48 months) and remained stable in the endoscope-assisted probing group (100% < 6 months; 97% > 48 months). Stent did not improve success.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscope-assisted probing increased success in older children and children with bilateral obstruction. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2016;53(5):292-299.].