Sulfoxaflor - A sulfoximine insecticide: Review and analysis of mode of action, resistance and cross-resistance

Cyto-Genotoxic Assessment of Sulfoxaflor in Allium cepa Root Cells and DNA Docking Studies

Sulfoxaflor (SFX) is an insecticide that is commonly used for the control of sap-feeding insects. Since SFX is extensively applied globally, it has been implicated in the substantial induction of environmental toxicity. Therefore, in this study, Allium cepa roots have been employed to elucidate the potential cytogenotoxic effects of SFX in non-target cells by examination of mitotic index (MI), chromosomal aberrations (CAs), and DNA damage. Physiological effects of SFX were evaluated by A. cepa root growth inhibition assay, while cytogenotoxic effects were assessed by A. cepa ana-telophase and comet assay. Moreover, DNA binding affinity and binding mode of SFX were examined using molecular docking simulations to shed light on the genotoxic mechanism of action. The half maximal effective concentration (EC50) on the growth of A. cepa cells calculated for SFX was found as 500 mg/L. Moreover, dose- and time-dependent decrease in MI, increase in CAs (disturbed ana-telophase, chromosomal laggards, stickiness, and anaphase chromosome bridge) and DNA damage were observed by the exposure of A. cepa root tips to SFX after 24-, 48-, 72-, and 96-h treatment periods. A 6-bp double-stranded DNA structure containing two intercalation sites (PDB ID: 1Z3F) was used for docking studies. According to DNA docking results, SFX exhibited an energetically more favorable binding affinity with DNA (ΔG = -5.05 kcal/mol) compared with the experimental mutagen methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) (ΔG = -2.94 kcal/mol), and preferentially snugly fits into the minor groove of DNA possessing an intercalation gap, thus, providing valuable mechanistic data into the formation of chromosome aberrations and DNA fragmentation induced by this pesticide in A. cepa.

Romance in peril: A common pesticide impairs mating behaviours and male fertility of solitary bees (Osmiabicornis)

Mating behaviour and fertility are strong selective forces, driving the reproductive trends of animals. Mating disorders may therefore contribute to the recent decline in insect and pollinators health worldwide. While the impact of pesticides on pollinators is widely considered as a driving factor for reducing pollinators health, their effect on mating behaviour and male fertility remains widely overlooked. Here, we assessed the effects of field-realistic exposure to a common pesticide used as a neonicotinoid substitute worldwide, sulfoxaflor, on the behaviour and male physiology of the solitary bee, Osmia bicornis. We measured a variety of parameters focusing on behaviours occurring before, and during mating, as well as sperm quantity. For the first time, we demonstrate that short-term chronic, field-realistic exposure to a common pesticide reduced pre-copulatory display (-36 %) and sounds (-27 %), increased the number of copulations (+110 %) and the mating duration (+166 %), while finally reducing sperm quantity (-25 %) and mating success (-43 %). Our research raises considerable concern on the impact of field-realistic, low sublethal pesticide levels on the fertility and reproductive success of pollinators. Assessing the impact of pesticides on fitness parameters and implementing more sustainable agricultural solutions would allow mitigating the ongoing threat of pesticide pollution on wild insect populations and the broader environment.

Neonicotinoid insecticide sulfoxaflor in the environment: a critical review of environmental fate, degradation mechanism, and toxic effects

In recent decades, neonicotinoids (NEOs) have become widely adopted in agriculture for the control of crop pests and plant pathogens, leading to improved crop yields and enhanced agricultural productivity. However, the prolonged and widespread use of NEOs has raised significant concerns regarding their environmental persistence, food safety, and public health risks. These pesticides have been shown to contaminate various environmental compartments, including soil, surface water, and groundwater, posing potential hazards to ecosystems and human health. Microbes play a crucial role in mitigating the environmental impact of toxic pesticides, with microbial degradation emerging as a promising, cost-effective strategy for degrading pesticide residues. Several sulfoxaflor (SUL)-degrading microbes have been isolated and characterized, yet the identification of microbes, genes, and enzymes responsible for the degradation of NEOs remains an area requiring further investigation. Despite some progress, few reviews have comprehensively addressed the underlying mechanisms of NEOs degradation. This paper provides a detailed review of research on the environmental distribution, exposure risks, and ecotoxicological effects of NEOs, with a particular focus on the environmental fate of SUL. It aims to offer a novel perspective on the fate of NEOs in the environment, their potential toxicological effects, and the role of microbes in mitigating their impact.

Both insertion mutation and low expression of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor Nlα4 subunit are associated with sulfoxaflor resistance in Nilaparvata lugens

BACKGROUND

Sulfoximine insecticide sulfoxaflor acts on insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). Metabolic resistance arising from increased activity of detoxification enzymes has been extensively documented in insect populations. Prior research by the present authors demonstrated the involvement of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases in mediating metabolic resistance to sulfoxaflor in Nilaparvata lugens. Nevertheless, investigations into the target-site resistance mechanisms of insects to sulfoxaflor remain limited.

RESULTS

The coding sequence (CDS) of 13 nAChR subunits in N. lugens of sulfoxaflor-susceptible (SFX-S) and sulfoxaflor-resistant (SFX-R) strains were cloned. A 'TGAC' insertion mutation at position 1428-1431 of the Nlα4 CDS was identified in the SFX-R strain. Genotyping revealed that 60% of individuals in the SFX-R strain carried the homozygous mutation, while 40% were heterozygous. Additionally, a homozygous mutant (Nlα4-M) strain was established for further investigation. Compared with the SFX-S [median lethal concentration (LC50) = 3.32 mg/L] strain, the expression levels of Nlα4 in the SFX-R (LC50 = 505.64 mg/L) and Nlα4-M (LC50 = 352.72 mg/L) strains were significantly down-regulated by 83.02% and 46.38%, respectively. Genetic linkage analysis confirmed a co-segregation of the Nlα4 mutation and its reduced expression with sulfoxaflor resistance in N. lugens. Furthermore, RNA interference (RNAi) targeting Nlα4 expression in both the SFX-S and Nlα4-M strains significantly decreased susceptibility to sulfoxaflor.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that both the insertion mutation and low expression of the Nlα4 subunit are strongly associated with sulfoxaflor resistance in N. lugens. The present study offers valuable theoretical insights for the rational design of novel insecticides and the effective management of insecticide resistance in N. lugens. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry.

Weight of evidence assessment of effects of sulfoxaflor on aquatic invertebrates: sulfoxaflor environmental science review part II

Effects of sulfoxaflor (SFX) on aquatic invertebrates were assessed by comparing concentrations predicted to occur in or measured in surface waters to thresholds for adverse effects. Due to the specific mode of toxic action, fishes are relatively tolerant of the effects of SFX. Daphnia magna with an LC50 of 378 mg SFX L-1 (SD = 19.13) was similarly tolerant of the effects of SFX, while the LOEC was > 110 mg SFX L-1. A threshold for effects on aquatic insects, based on the chironomid midge, C. tentans, had LOAEL and NOAEL values of 0.0455 and 0.0618 mg L-1, respectively. The acute-to-chronic ratio was 18. Simulation models and parameters selected for a range of applications to crops predicted environmental concentrations (EECs) in surface waters to range from 2.2 to 7.7 µg L-1. Based on these EECs, the maximum hazard quotient (HQ) was 0.11, which is less than the US EPA level of concern (LOC) of 0.5, which would normally be the threshold to trigger regulatory action or higher-tier assessments. The risks posed by SFX to aquatic organisms are predicted to be de minimis. Hazard quotients based on EEC values predicted in the standard, USEPA farm pond estimated by use of the Pesticides in Water Calculator (PWC version 1.52) for scenarios of maximum application rates for cotton and LOAEL and NOAEL values for aquatic insects for SFX were less than or similar to those for other insecticides including neonicotinoids and organophosphorus compounds.

Properties, mode of insecticidal action, environmental exposure pathways, and uses of the insecticide sulfoxaflor; sulfoxaflor environmental science review part I

Sulfoxaflor (SFX, CAS# 946578-00-3) is marketed by Corteva Agrisciences Inc. as Isoclast®. SFX is a Group 4C, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist and is a systemic insecticide that is most active against sucking insects. This paper critically reviews and characterizes the physical and chemical properties of SFX to facilitate development of conceptual models that identify environmental compartments with the greatest potential concentrations and organisms most likely to be exposed. These conceptual models were assessed in a Weight of Evidence (WoE) framework to identify scenarios and organisms at greatest risk. The solubility of SFX in water is approximately 550 mg L-1 and the POW of 0.8, so it will not bioconcentrate or undergo trophic transfer. It has the potential to move in soils, but this is unlikely because of the short half-life (hours to 2-5 days) in agricultural soils where bacteria mediate dissipation. Some of the transformation products of SFX have longer half-lives (months) in soil and are more mobile but are less toxic and not a concern for adverse effects. SFX does not undergo significant photolysis or hydrolysis in water, but this does not lead to a risk in aquatic systems because it is not approved for over-water use and the label recommends buffer zones to protect sensitive aquatic areas. Overall, use of SFX under good agricultural practices is unlikely to result in biologically relevant exposures in non-target species or areas in the environment.

Toxicity responses of different bee species to flupyradifurone and sulfoxaflor insecticides reveal species and sex-based variations

Mason bees (Osmia spp.) are solitary, tunnel-nesting bees. Several species, including the horn-faced bee (Osmia cornifrons) and the blue orchard bee (Osmia lignaria), are commercially managed, primarily for the pollination of fruit trees and tree nuts. They are efficient pollinators and have high pollen fidelity, and so can greatly benefit orchard yields compared to honey bees (Apis mellifera) alone. Apis mellifera are often used as surrogates for other pollinators during pesticide risk assessment. Non-Apis bee species, however, can be more sensitive to certain pesticides, so it is also important to research the impact of novel pesticides on other bee species. This study investigated the effect of two formulated pesticide products containing recently approved active ingredients, sulfoxaflor and flupyradifurone, on the survival of A. mellifera and three species of mason bees (O. lignaria, O. cornifrons, and Osmia californica). Bees were orally exposed to sulfoxaflor or flupyradifurone and their survival was measured over four days following exposure. Bee sensitivity to the insecticides varied by species and sex of bee. Apis mellifera was the least sensitive, followed by O. cornifrons, with O. lignaria and O. californica as the most sensitive. Male Osmia spp. bees were less sensitive than females. These insecticides may pose a higher risk to the health of Osmia spp. compared to A. mellifera.

miRNAs modulate altered expression of cytochrome P450s and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits conferring both metabolic and target resistance to sulfoxaflor in Nilaparvata lugens (Stål)

Understanding the insecticide resistance mechanisms and their underlying regulatory pathways is essential for pest management. Previous findings indicated that the overexpression of P450 gene, CYP6ER1, was a key mechanism for sulfoxaflor metabolic resistance in Nilaparvata lugens. However, it remains unclear whether quantitative changes in the target nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) contribute to sulfoxaflor resistance and the underlying regulatory mechanisms involved. Here, qRT-PCR, pairwise correlation analyses and RNAi confirmed that the down-regulation of Nlα4, along with the up-regulation of Nlα10 and Nlβ1, were linked to sulfoxaflor resistance in N. lugens. Four microRNAs, novel-m0262-5p, novel-m0071-3p and novel-m0196-3p, and miR-10471-x were found to target CYP6ER1, Nlα4 and Nlβ1, respectively. Subsequently, the binding activity between these miRNAs and their target genes was verified by dual fluorescence in vitro. Over-supplementation of novel-m0262-5p and miR-10471-x via miRNA agomir injections suppressed the expression of CYP6ER1 and Nlβ1, and decreased nymph resistance to sulfoxaflor. Conversely, novel-m0262-5p and miR-10471-x antagomirs treatment induced the expression of CYP6ER1 and Nlβ1, thereby enhancing sulfoxaflor resistance. Additionally, overexpression of novel-m0071-3p and novel-m0196-3p inhibited Nlα4 expression and increased sulfoxaflor resistance. These findings indicate that miRNAs regulate the differential expression of P450s and nAChRs, mediating both metabolic and target resistance to sulfoxaflor in N. lugens.

Bumblebees prefer sulfoxaflor-contaminated food and show caste-specific differences in sulfoxaflor sensitivity

More than 30% of human food crop yield requires animal pollination. In addition, successful crop production depends on agrochemicals to control pests. However, agrochemicals can have negative consequences on beneficial insect pollinators, such as bees. We investigated the effects of an emerging class of pesticides, sulfoximines, on the common eastern bumblebee, Bombus impatiens. We performed a series of 96-hour toxicity tests on microcolonies of laboratory-reared B. impatiens. Our data showed that sulfoxaflor (SFX) is significantly less toxic to B. impatiens than historically used neonicotinoid pesticides, such as thiamethoxam. Further, for the first time, we found significant differences among castes in sensitivity to SFX; workers and drones were more sensitive than queens. These findings are notable because they reveal both caste and sex-specific differences in bumblebee sensitivity to pesticides. Interestingly, we found no evidence that bumblebees avoid SFX-contaminated sugar syrup. To the contrary, B. impatiens workers had an apparent preference for SFX-contaminated sugar syrup over sugar syrup alone. Overall, our investigation provides novel information on an important pesticide and may help inform regulatory decisions regarding pesticide use.

Risk Assessment of Cyclaniliprole Resistance in Peach-Potato Aphid Myzus persicae: Laboratory Selection, Inheritance, and Cross-Resistance Patterns

Cyclaniliprole, a type of the third-generation anthranilic diamide insecticide, was mainly used for management of various pests. Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae), known as the peach-potato aphid, is an economically essential pest with worldwide distribution. However, the risk assessment of cyclaniliprole in M. persicae is unclear. The cyclaniliprole risk assessment in M. persicae showed 2.56-fold resistance to cyclaniliprole after 26 generation selection in comparison to the initial susceptible population. The cross-resistance experiment revealed that the low cross-resistance to imidacloprid (4.2-fold) in the cyclaniliprole-selected strain was observed when comparing to the susceptible population. Realized heritability (h2) of cyclaniliprole resistance was 0.0362. When mean slope = 2.217 and h2 = 0.0362, then 31-69 generations would be required for an increase of LC50s with ten times at 90%-50% selection intensity. The fecundity (the number of offspring per female) of the cyclaniliprole-selected strain had no significant difference with the susceptible population. The mRNA expression of the target gene ryanodine receptor was significantly enhanced in the cyclaniliprole-selected strain. The absence of fitness costs, the minimal resistance risk, and very low levels of cross-resistance in the cyclaniliprole-selected strain provide strong support for designing the effective management strategies against M. persicae.

The Changes in Cross-Resistance, Fitness, and Feeding Behavior in Aphis gossypii as Their Resistance to Sulfoxaflor Declines

The increasing resistance in Aphis gossypii field populations to sulfoxaflor and many different types of insecticides represents a significant challenge in protecting cotton production in China. Although resistant pests were able to regain their susceptibility to insecticides after the reduction in insecticide applications, some of their biological parameters remained different from susceptible strains. The resistance to sulfoxaflor was unstable in A. gossypii after the loss of selective pressure. The strain with declined resistance (Sul-D) (RR = 1.11-fold) restored its susceptibility to sulfoxaflor, acetamiprid, and imidacloprid after the sulfoxaflor-resistant (Sul-R) (RR = 51.57-fold) was maintained without insecticide pressure for 22 generations. Sul-R had a relative fitness of 0.87, and the Sul-D strain still had a relative fitness of 0.84, even if its susceptibility to sulfoxaflor was restored. Compared with the susceptible strain (Sus), the Sul-R and Sul-D strains became more active in searching for appropriate feeding positions because they generated more intercellular apoplastic stylar pathway events (C). However, the phloem-feeding ability was reduced in the Sul-R and Sul-D strains, as shown by the decrease in phloem behavioral parameters, such as phloem salivations (E1), phloem ingestion (E2), and the percentages of E1 and E2. The negative hormesis effect of sulfoxaflor on phloem feeding was observed in susceptible strain but not in Sul-R and Sul-D, as evidenced by the significant decreases in the number of E1, the duration of E1 and E2, and the percentage of E1 and E2 in the Sus strain. Sulfoxaflor resistance was unstable in A. gossypii, and there was still a fitness cost to A. gossypii after recovering susceptibility to sulfoxaflor. The phloem-feeding ability was reduced in the Sul-R and Sul-D strains compared with the Sus strain, but the negative hormesis effect of sulfoxaflor on phloem feeding was only found in the Sus strain. The outcomes of this study could contribute to a comprehensive risk assessment and provide a basis for developing a better strategy to control A. gossypii.

Preference and Toxicity of Sulfoxaflor, Flupyradifurone, and Triflumezopyrim Bait against the Fire Ant Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Their Efficacy under Field Conditions

The red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) is native to South America; however, its introduction to other countries has caused serious biodiversity, agricultural, and public health problems. As toxic bait is an effective method to control fire ant populations, the aim of this study was to determine the most effective concentration of sulfoxaflor, flupyradifurone, and triflumezopyrim as ingredients for baits against S. invicta under laboratory and field conditions. Sulfoxaflor, flupyradifurone, and triflumezopyrim had no effect on the feeding behavior of the fire ants. However, they significantly reduced the climbing, walking, and arrest abilities of the fire ant workers after 10 days of treatment, and insecticides were horizontally transferred from workers to alates or larvae. Specifically, sulfoxaflor and triflumezopyrim at 0.05% concentration were the most effective in exterminating fire ants. Sulfoxaflor and triflumezopyrim are nonrepellent and effective insecticides against S. invicta.

Synthesis of N-Sulfinyl Sulfoximines from 5-(Sulfoximido)dibenzothiophenium Triflates and Sodium Sulfinates

A transition-metal-free and efficient S-O/S-N bond interconversion reaction has been developed. The protocol facilitates an efficient synthesis of N-sulfinyl sulfoximines by reacting sulfoximido-substituted sulfonium salts with a wide range of sodium sulfinates, featuring broad substrate scope, including a plethora of heterocyclic and fluoroalkyl substrates, high functional group tolerance, and mild conditions.

The Synergistic Effect of Lemongrass Essential Oil and Flometoquin, Flonicamid, and Sulfoxaflor on Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae): Insights into Toxicity, Biochemical Impact, and Molecular Docking

The whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.), is one of the most dangerous polyphagous pests in the world. Eco-friendly compounds and new chemical insecticides have gained recognition for whitefly control. In this study, the toxicity and biochemical impact of flometoquin, flonicamid, and sulfoxaflor, alone or combined with lemongrass essential oil (EO), against B. tabaci was studied. In addition, a molecular docking study was conducted to assess the binding affinity of the tested compounds to AchE. Based on the LC values, the descending order of the toxicity of the tested compounds to B. tabaci adults was as follows: sulfoxaflor > flonicamid > flometoquin > lemongrass EO. The binary mixtures of each of the tested compounds with lemongrass EO exhibited synergism in all combinations, with observed mortalities ranging from 15.09 to 22.94% higher than expected for an additive effect. Sulfoxaflor and flonicamid, alone or in combination with lemongrass EO, significantly inhibited AchE activity while only flonicamid demonstrated a significant impact on α-esterase, and none of the tested compounds affected cytochrome P450 or GST. However, the specific activity of P450 was significantly inhibited by the lemongrass/sulfoxaflor mixture while α-esterase activity was significantly inhibited by the lemongrass/flometoquin mixture. Moreover, the lemongrass EO and all the tested insecticides exhibited significant binding affinity to AchE with energy scores ranging from -4.69 to -7.06 kcal/mol. The current findings provide a foundation for utilizing combinations of essential oils and insecticides in the integrated pest management (IPM) of B. tabaci.

The evolving story of sulfoxaflor resistance in the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer)

BACKGROUND

The green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer), is one of the most economically important crop pests worldwide. Insecticide resistance in this pest was first detected over 60 years ago, with resistance in M. persicae now spanning over 80 active ingredients. Sulfoxaflor is a relatively new insecticide that is primarily used to control sap-feeding insects. In 2018 resistance to sulfoxaflor was discovered in field populations of M. persicae in Australia. This study aimed to determine the current distribution and phenotypic levels of sulfoxaflor resistance in Australian clones of M. persicae and to investigate how these patterns relate to clonal type.

RESULTS

For the first time, we show there is low-level resistance (8-26-fold) distributed across Australia, with resistance being detected in aphids collected from approximately 20% of all M. persicae collected and screened. Furthermore, this study shows sulfoxaflor resistance is found in two M. persicae haplotypes, providing evidence that there have been multiple independent evolutionary events which have given rise to sulfoxaflor resistance in this species.

CONCLUSION

These findings have important implications for the chemical control of M. persicae in Australia, especially when considering the broader genetic background of these aphids which are known to harbour a number of other insecticide resistance mechanisms. We recommend continuous monitoring of sulfoxaflor resistance in field populations of M. persicae (in Australia and elsewhere) and further research into the underlying genetic mechanisms conferring resistance to sulfoxaflor in both clonal haplotypes. © 2023 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Discovery of piperonyl-tethered sulfoximines as novel low bee-toxicity aphicides targeting Amelα1/ratβ2 complex

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) is recognized as a significant insecticide target for neonicotinoids and some agonists. In this study, the nAChR α1 subunit from Apis mellifera was first found to be narrowly tuned to different bee toxicity insecticides, namely, sulfoxaflor (SFX) and flupyradifurone (FPF). Hence, novel sulfoximine derivatives 7a-h were rationally designed and synthesized by introducing a benzo[d][1,3]dioxole moiety into a unique sulfoximine skeleton based on the binding cavity characteristics of Amelα1/ratβ2. The two electrode voltage clamp responses of 7a-h were obviously lower than that of SFX, indicating their potentially low bee toxicity. Besides, representative compounds 7b and 7g exhibited low bee toxicity (LD50 > 11.0 μg/bee at 48 h) revealed by acute contact toxicity bioassays. Molecular modelling results indicated that Ile152, Ala151, and Val160 from honeybee subunit Amelα1 and Lys144 and Trp80 from aphid subunit Mpα1 may be crucial for bee toxicity and aphicidal activity, respectively. These results clarify the toxic mechanism of agonist insecticides on nontargeted pollinators and reveal novel scaffold sulfoximine aphicidal candidates with low bee toxicity. These results will provide a new perspective on the rational design and highly effective development of novel eco-friendly insecticides based on the structure of the nAChR subunit.

Applications of Bioisosteres in the Design of Biologically Active Compounds

The design of bioisosteres represents a creative and productive approach to improve a molecule, including by enhancing potency, addressing pharmacokinetic challenges, reducing off-target liabilities, and productively modulating physicochemical properties. Bioisosterism is a principle exploited in the design of bioactive compounds of interest to both medicinal and agricultural chemists, and in this review, we provide a synopsis of applications where this kind of molecular editing has proved to be advantageous in molecule optimization. The examples selected for discussion focus on bioisosteres of carboxylic acids, applications of fluorine and fluorinated motifs in compound design, some applications of the sulfoximine functionality, the design of bioisosteres of drug-H2O complexes, and the design of bioisosteres of the phenyl ring.

Residues of sulfoxaflor and its metabolites in floral and extrafloral nectar from Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. (Malvaceae) with or without co-application of tebuconazole

Systemic pesticide exposure through nectar is a growing global concern linked to loss of insect diversity, especially pollinators. The insecticide sulfoxaflor and the fungicide tebuconazole are currently widely used systemic pesticides which are toxic to certain pollinators. However, their metabolisms in floral or extrafloral nectar under different application methods have not yet been well studied. Hibiscus rosa-sinensis was exposed to sulfoxaflor and tebuconazole via soil drenching and foliar spraying. Sulfoxaflor, tebuconazole, and their main metabolites in floral and extrafloral nectar, soil, and leaves were identified and quantified using liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-QqQ MS). The chemical compositions of unexposed and contaminated H. rosa-sinensis floral nectar or extrafloral nectar were compared using regular biochemical methods. The activities of two pesticide detoxifying enzymes, glutathione-s-transferase and nitrile hydratase, in H. rosa-sinensis nectar were examined using LC-MS and spectrophotometry. The floral nectar proteome of H. rosa-sinensis was analysed using high-resolution orbitrap-based MS/MS analysis to screen for sulfoxaflor and tebuconazole detoxifying enzymes. H. rosa-sinensis can absorb sulfoxaflor and tebuconazole through its roots or leaf surfaces and secrete them into floral nectar and extrafloral nectar. Both sulfoxaflor and tebuconazole and their major metabolites were present at higher concentrations in extrafloral nectar than in floral nectar. X11719474 was the dominant metabolite of sulfoxaflor in the nectars we studied. Compared with soil application, more sulfoxaflor and tebuconazole remained in their original forms in floral nectar and extrafloral nectar after foliar application. Sulfoxaflor and tebuconazole exposure did not modify the chemical composition of floral or extrafloral nectar. No active components, including proteins in the nectar, were detected to be able to detoxify sulfoxaflor.

Unicellular cyanobacteria degrade sulfoxaflor to its amide metabolite of potentially higher aquatic toxicity

Sulfoxaflor (SFX) is a fourth-generation neonicotinoid used widely in modern agriculture. Due to its high water solubility and mobility in environment, it is expected to occur in water environment. Degradation of SFX leads to formation of corresponding amide (M474), which in the light of recent studies may be much more toxic to aquatic organisms than the parent molecule. Therefore, the aim of the study was to assess the potential of two common species of unicellular bloom-forming cyanobacteria (Synechocystis salina and Microcystis aeruginosa) to metabolize SFX in a 14-day-long experiment, using elevated (10 mg L-1) and predicted highest environmental (10 μg L-1) concentrations. The results obtained support the occurrence of SFX metabolism in cyanobacterial monocultures, leading to release of M474 into the water. Differential SFX decline in culture media, followed by the presence of M474, was observed for both species at different concentration levels. For S. salina, SFX concentration decreased by 7.6% at lower concentration and by 21.3% at higher concentration; the M474 concentrations were 436 ng L-1 and 514 μg L-1, respectively. Corresponding values for M. aeruginosa were 14.3% and 3.0% for SFX decline; 282 ng L-1 and 317 μg L-1 for M474 concentration. In the same time, abiotic degradation was almost non-existent. Metabolic fate of SFX was then studied for its elevated starting concentration. Uptake of SFX to cells and amounts of M474 released to water fully addressed the decrease in SFX concentration in M. aeruginosa culture, while in S. salina 15.5% of initial SFX was transformed to yet unknown metabolites. The degradation rate of SFX observed in the present study is sufficient to produce a concentration of M474 that is potentially toxic for aquatic invertebrates during cyanobacterial blooms. Therefore, there is a need for more reliable risk assessment for the presence of SFX in natural waters.

Overexpression of NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase is associated with sulfoxaflor resistance and neonicotinoid cross-resistance in Nilaparvata lugens (Stål)

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)-cytochrome P450 reductase (CPR), a crucial electron-transfer partner of P450 systems, is required for various biological reactions catalyzed by P450 monooxygenase. Our previous study indicated that enhanced P450 enzyme detoxification and CYP6ER1 overexpression contributed to sulfoxaflor resistance in Nilaparvata lugens. However, the association between CPR, sulfoxaflor resistance, and neonicotinoid cross-resistance in N. lugens remains unclear. In this study, the sulfoxaflor-resistant (SFX-SEL) (RR = 254.04-fold), resistance-decline (DESEL) (RR = 18.99-fold), and susceptible unselected (UNSEL) strains of N. lugens with the same genetic background were established. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) revealed that the N. lugens CPR (NlCPR) expression level in the SFX-SEL strain was 6.85-fold and 6.07-fold higher than in UNSEL and DESEL strains, respectively. NlCPR expression was significantly higher in the abdomens of UNSEL, DESEL, and SFX-SEL fourth-instar nymphs than in other tissues (thoraxes, heads, and legs). Additionally, sulfoxaflor stress significantly increased NlCPR mRNA levels in the UNSEL, SFX-SEL and DESEL strains. NlCPR silencing by RNA interference (RNAi) dramatically increased the susceptibility of the UNSEL, DESEL, and SFX-SEL strains to sulfoxaflor, but the recovery of SFX-SEL was more obvious. Furthermore, NlCPR silencing led to a significant recovery in susceptibility to nitenpyram, dinotefuran, clothianidin, and thiamethoxam across all strains (UNSEL, DESEL, and SFX-SEL), with the greatest degree of recovery in the sulfoxaflor-resistant strain (SFX-SEL). Our findings suggest that NlCPR overexpression contributes to sulfoxaflor resistance and neonicotinoid cross-resistance in N. lugens. This will aid in elucidating the significance of CPR in the evolution of P450-mediated metabolic resistance in N. lugens.

Sulfoxaflor induces immunotoxicity in zebrafish (Danio rerio) by activating TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway

Sulfoxaflor is an insecticide that is widely used and affects the nervous system of sucking pests. However, studies on the molecular mechanism of the toxicity of sulfoxaflor to non-target species are limited. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) was used as an experimental subject in this study. Zebrafish embryos were exposed to 20, 25, and 30 mg/L sulfoxaflor solution to detect hatchability, mortality, heart rate, neutrophil count, oxidative stress, and expression of genes related to apoptosis and immune inflammation. The results showed that zebrafish embryos exposed to sulfoxaflor solution increased mortality and growth retardation, and the number of innate immune cells decreased significantly. In addition, the expression levels of apoptotic and proapoptotic genes increased significantly, and oxidative stress-related indexes changed significantly. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway was further studied, and the interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), TLR4, and myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MYD88) gene expression levels were significantly up-regulated. We used small molecule inhibitor QNZ for the rescue experiment and detected the expression of relevant target proteins in the QNZ signaling pathway. QNZ reduced the expression of TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway-related protein NF-κB p65 in the cytoplasm and nucleus and rescued the number of innate immune cells. In summary, sulfoxaflor may induce developmental toxicity and immunotoxicity in zebrafish by activating the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway, which provides a basis for further studies on the molecular mechanism of sulfoxaflor action in the aquatic ecosystem and the development and utilization of QNZ.

Hormesis effects of sulfoxaflor on Aphis gossypii feeding, growth, reproduction behaviour and the related mechanisms

Sulfoxaflor, an important alternative insecticide in integrated pest management (IPM) strategies, can effectively control sap-feeding insect pests such as Aphis gossypii. Although the side effects of sulfoxaflor have recently attracted widespread attention, its toxicological characteristics and mechanisms are still largely undefined. Therefore, the biological characteristics, life table and feeding behaviour of A. gossypii were studied to evaluate the hormesis effect of sulfoxaflor. Then, the potential mechanisms of induced fecundity associated with the vitellogenin (Ag. Vg) and vitellogenin receptor (Ag. VgR) genes were investigated. Although the LC₁₀ and LC₃₀ concentrations of sulfoxaflor significantly reduced the fecundity and net reproduction rate (R₀) of the directly exposed sulfoxaflor-resistant and susceptible aphids, hormesis effects on fecundity and R₀ were observed in the F₁ generation of Sus A. gossypii when the parental generation was exposed to the LC₁₀ of sulfoxaflor. Moreover, the hormesis effects of sulfoxaflor on phloem feeding were observed in both A. gossypii strains. Additionally, enhanced expression levels and protein content of Ag. Vg and Ag. VgR were observed in progeny generations when F₀ was subjected to the trans- and multigenerational sublethal sulfoxaflor exposure. Therefore, sulfoxaflor-induced resurgence might occur in A. gossypii after exposure to sublethal concentrations. Our study could contribute to a comprehensive risk assessment and provide convincing reference to optimize sulfoxaflor in IPM strategies.

Real-time monitoring of honeybee colony daily activity and bee loss rates can highlight the risk posed by a pesticide

Information on honeybee foraging performance and especially bee loss rates at the colony level are crucial for evaluating the magnitude of effects due to pesticide exposure, thereby ensuring that protection goals for honeybee colonies are met (i.e. threshold of acceptable effects). However, current methods for monitoring honeybee foraging activity and mortality are very approximate (visual records) or are time-limited and mostly based on single cohort analysis. We therefore assess the potential of bee counters, that enable a colony-level and continuous monitoring of bee flight activity and mortality, in pesticide risk assessment. After assessing the background activity and bee loss rates, we exposed colonies to two concentrations of sulfoxaflor (a neurotoxic insecticide) in sugar syrup: a concentration that was considered to be field realistic (0.59 μg/ml) and a higher concentration (2.36 μg/ml) representing a worst-case exposure scenario. We did not find any effect of the field-realistic concentration on flight activity and bee loss rates. However, a two-fold decrease in daily flight activity and a 10-fold increase in daily bee losses were detected in colonies exposed to the highest sulfoxaflor concentration as compared to before exposure. When compared to the theoretical trigger values associated with the specific protection goal of 7 % colony-size reduction, the observed fold changes in daily bee losses were often found to be at risk for colonies. In conclusion, the real-time and colony-level monitoring of bee loss rates, combined with threshold values indicating at which levels bee loss rates threaten the colony, have great potential for improving regulatory pesticide risk assessments for honeybees under field conditions.

The molecular mechanisms of insecticide resistance in aphid crop pests

Aphids are a group of hemipteran insects that include some of the world's most economically important agricultural pests. The control of pest aphids has relied heavily on the use of chemical insecticides, however, the evolution of resistance poses a serious threat to their sustainable control. Over 1000 cases of resistance have now been documented for aphids involving a remarkable diversity of mechanisms that, individually or in combination, allow the toxic effect of insecticides to be avoided or overcome. In addition to its applied importance as a growing threat to human food security, insecticide resistance in aphids also offers an exceptional opportunity to study evolution under strong selection and gain insight into the genetic variation fuelling rapid adaptation. In this review we summarise the biochemical and molecular mechanisms underlying resistance in the most economically important aphid pests worldwide and the insights study of this topic has provided on the genomic architecture of adaptive traits.

Sulfoxaflor adversely influences the biological characteristics of Coccinella septempunctata by suppressing vitellogenin expression and predation activity

Sulfoxaflor is a widely used sulfoximine insecticide that has been regarded as an important alternative insecticide for IPM strategies, but a comprehensive study of its potential ecological toxicity is still lacking. In the present work, the growth, longevity, predation and reproduction toxicity of Coccinella septempunctata caused by sulfoxaflor were evaluated. In addition, the potential mechanisms of decreased fecundity in C. septempunctata were investigated by analyzing the transcriptional and protein levels of reproduction-related gene vitellogenin (Vg). In a 20-day acute contact toxicity test, decreased survival proportion, pupation rate, adult emergence ratio, and increased hazard quotient (HQ) values were observed. Moreover, sublethal dosages of sulfoxaflor significantly inhibited the predation, longevity, fecundity and net reproduction rate of progeny. In addition, LR₃₀ of sulfoxaflor dramatically down-regulate the mRNA-expression (F₀: 65.38-fold, F₁: 2.24-fold) and protein content (F₀: 1.35-fold, F₁: 1.36-fold) of Vg in the F₀ and F₁ generations. These results suggested that sulfoxaflor could inhibit the gene and protein content of Vg, thereby reducing the fecundity of C. septempunctata. Our study indicated that sulfoxaflor has potential risks to parent and progeny generations of C. septempunctata. These results provide valuable reference for optimal usage of sulfoxaflor in IPM systems.

Novel Matrine Derivatives as Potential Larvicidal Agents against Aedes albopictus: Synthesis, Biological Evaluation, and Mechanistic Analysis

A large number of studies have shown that matrine (MA) possesses various pharmacological activities and is one of the few natural, plant-derived pesticides with the highest prospects for promotion and application. Fifty-eight MA derivatives were prepared, including 10 intermediates and 48 target compounds in 3 series, to develop novel mosquitocidal agents. Compounds 4b, 4e, 4f, 4m, 4n, 6e, 6k, 6m, and 6o showed good larvicidal activity against Aedes albopictus, which is both a highly aggressive mosquito and an important viral vector that can transmit a wide range of pathogens. Dipping methods and a bottle bioassay were used for insecticidal activity evaluation. The LC50 values of 4e, 4m, and 6m reached 147.65, 140.08, and 205.79 μg/mL, respectively, whereas the LC50 value of MA was 659.34 μg/mL. Structure–activity relationship analysis demonstrated that larvicidal activity could be improved by the unsaturated heterocyclic groups introduced into the carboxyl group after opening the D ring. The MA derivatives with oxidized N-1 lost their mosquitocidal activities, indicating that the bareness of N-1 is crucial to maintain their anti-mosquito activity. However, the activity was not greatly influenced by introducing a cyan group at C-6 or a benzene sulfonyl group at N-16. Additionally, compounds 4e and 4m exhibited good inhibitory activities against acetylcholinesterase with inhibitory rates of 59.12% and 54.30%, respectively, at a concentration of 250 μg/mL, whereas the inhibitory rate of MA was 9.88%. Therefore, the structural modification and mosquitocidal activity of MA and its derivatives obtained here pave the way for those seeking strong mosquitocidal agents of plant origin.

Identification of sulfonamide compounds active on the insect nervous system: Molecular modeling, synthesis and biological evaluation

Insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are a recognized target for insecticide design. In this work, we have identified, from a structure-based approach using molecular modeling tools, ligands with potential selective activity for pests versus pollinators. A high-throughput virtual screening with the Openeye software was performed using a library from the ZINC database, thiacloprid being used as the target structure. The top sixteen molecules were then docked in α6 cockroach and honeybee homomeric nAChRs to check from a theoretical point of view relevant descriptors in favor of pest selectivity. Among the selected molecules, one original sulfonamide compound has afterward been synthesized, together with various analogs. Two compounds of this family have been shown to behave as activators of the cockroach cholinergic synaptic transmission.

Identification and quantitation of the novel insecticide sulfoxaflor and its metabolites in floral nectar from Salvia splendens Ker Gawl. (Lamiaceae)

Sulfoxaflor is a new systemic insecticide developed as a replacement for older neonicotinoids which are known to be toxic to pollinators. However, its metabolism in nectar and effect on nectar biosynthesis have not been investigated. After soil and foliar application, sulfoxaflor and its main metabolites in soil, leaf and Salvia splendens nectar, were measured by liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (LC-MS/MS). The chemical composition between the clean and sulfoxaflor spiked nectar were also compared. The activities of two possible sulfoxaflor detoxifying enzymes in S. splendens nectar, nitrile hydratase and glutathione-s-transferase, were measured by LC-MS and spectrophotometry. S. splendens nectar proteome was investigated by high-resolution orbitrap-based MS/MS to screen for sulfoxaflor detoxifying relevant proteins. S. splendens could absorb sulfoxaflor through root or leaf surface and secrete a proportion of sulfoxaflor along with its metabolites into the nectar. After soil application, sulfoxaflor's low toxic metabolite X11719474 was dominant in the nectar and reached an average concentration of 8905 ppb. However, after foliar application, sulfoxaflor was dominant over its metabolites in the nectar. S. splendens nectar has no nitrile hydratase and glutathione-s-transferase activity and none of the 106 proteins identified in the nectar were predicted to function in detoxifying sulfoxaflor. Soil and foliar sulfoxaflor application can result in different profiles of sulfoxaflor and its metabolites presented in the nectar. However, sulfoxaflor had no effects on S. splendens nectar secretion and chemical composition and cannot be directly detoxified by components in the nectar.

Impact of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor mutation R81T on the response of European Myzus persicae populations to imidacloprid and sulfoxaflor in laboratory and in the field

Sulfoxaflor (Isoclast™ active) is a sulfoximine insecticide that is active on a broad range of sap-feeding insects, including species that exhibit reduced susceptibility to currently available insecticides. Colonies of Myzus persicae (green peach aphid) were established from aphids collected in the field from peach (Prunus persica) and nectarine (Prunus persica var. nucipersica) orchards in France, Italy and Spain. The presence of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) point mutation R81T was determined for all the colonies. Eight of the 35 colonies collected were susceptible relative to R81T (i.e., R81T absent), three of the colonies were found to be homozygous for R81T while 24 colonies had R81T present in some proportion (heterozygous). Sulfoxaflor and imidacloprid were tested in the laboratory against these M. persicae field colonies, which exhibited a wide range of susceptibilities (sulfoxaflor RR = 0.6 to 61, imidacloprid RR = 0.7 to 986) (resistance ratios, RR) to both insecticides. Although sulfoxaflor was consistently more active than imidacloprid against these field collected M. persicae, there was a statistically significant correlation across all colonies between the RRs for imidacloprid and sulfoxaflor (Pearson's r = 0.939, p < 0.0001). However, when a larger group of the colonies from Spain possessing R81T were analyzed, there was no correlation observed for the RRs between imidacloprid and sulfoxaflor (r = 0.2901, p = 0.3604). Thus, consistent with prior studies, the presence of R81T by itself is not well correlated with altered susceptibility to sulfoxaflor. In field trials, sulfoxaflor (24 and 36 gai/ha) was highly effective (~avg. 88-96% control) against M. persicae, demonstrating similar levels of efficacy as flonicamid (60-70 gai/ha) and spirotetramat (100-180 gai/ha) at 13-15 days after application, in contrast to imidacloprid (110-190 gai/ha) and acetamiprid (50-75 gai/ha) with lower levels of efficacy (~avg. 62-67% control). Consequently, sulfoxaflor is an effective tool for use in insect pest management programs for M. persicae. However, it is recommended that sulfoxaflor be used in the context of an insecticide resistance management program as advocated by the Insecticide Resistance Action Committee involving rotation with insecticides possessing other modes of action (i.e., avoiding rotation with other Group 4 insecticides) to minimize the chances for resistance development and to extend its future utility.

Design, Synthesis and Bioactivity of Novel Low Bee-Toxicity Compounds Based on Flupyrimin

Neonicotinoids are important insecticides for controlling aphids in agriculture. Growing research suggested that neonicotinoid insecticides are a key factor causing the decline of global pollinator insects, such as bees. Flupyrimin (FLP) is a novel nicotinic insecticide with unique biological properties and no cross-resistance, and is safe for pollinators. Using FLP as the lead compound, a series of novel compounds were designed and synthesized by replacing the amide fragment with a sulfonamideone. Their structures were confirmed by ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR and HRMS spectra. Bioassay results showed that compound 2j had good insecticidal activity against Aphis glycines with an LC₅₀ value of 20.93 mg/L. Meanwhile, compound 2j showed significantly lower acute oral and contact toxicity to Apis mellifera. In addition, compound 2j interacted well with the protein in insect acetylcholine binding protein (AChBP). The molecular docking on honeybee nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) indicated that the sulfonamide group of compound 2j did not form a hydrogen bond with Arg173 of the β subunit, which conforms to the reported low bee-toxicity conformation. In general, target compound 2j can be regarded as a bee-friendly insecticide candidate.

Sub-lethal doses of sulfoxaflor impair honey bee homing ability

Agricultural intensification has increased the number of stressors that pollinators are exposed to. Besides increasing landscape fragmentation that limit the supply of flower resources, intensive agricultural practices relying on the use of pesticides to control agricultural pests also affect non-target organisms like honey bees. The use of most pesticides containing neonicotinoids has been severely restricted in the European Union, leaving pesticides containing acetamiprid as the only ones that are still authorized. In the meantime, new substances like sulfoxaflor, that have a similar mode of action acting on the insect's nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR), have been approved for agricultural use. In Europe and USA, the use of pesticides containing this active ingredient is limited due to toxic effects already reported on bees, but no restrictions regarding this matter were applied in other countries (e.g., Brazil). In this study, homing ability tests with acetamiprid and sulfoxaflor were performed, in which honey bees were fed with three sub-lethal doses from each substance. After exposure, each honey bee was equipped with an RFID chip and released 1 km away from the colony to evaluate their homing ability. No significant effects were detected in honey bees fed with 32, 48 and 61 ng of acetamiprid while a poor performance on their homing ability, with only 28% of them reaching the colony instead of 75%, was detected at a 26 ng/a.s./bee dose of sulfoxaflor. Although, both pesticides act on the nAChR, the higher sulfoxaflor toxicity might be related with the honey bees detoxifying mechanisms, which are more effective on cyano-based neonicotinoids (i.e., acetamiprid) than sulfoximines. With this study we encourage the use of homing ability tests to be a suitable candidate to integrate the future risk assessment scheme, providing valuable data to models predicting effects on colony health that emerge from the individual actions of each bee.

Impairments in learning and memory performances associated with nicotinic receptor expression in the honeybee Apis mellifera after exposure to a sublethal dose of sulfoxaflor

Sulfoxaflor is a new insecticide which acts on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChRs) in a similar way to neonicotinoids. However, sufloxaflor (SFX) is thought to act in a different manner and is thus proposed as an alternative in crop protection. The goal of this study is to evaluate the toxicity of SFX and its sublethal effect on the honeybee Apis mellifera after acute exposure. In toxicological assay studies, the LD50 value and sublethal dose (corresponding to the NOEL: no observed effect level) were 96 and 15 ng/bee, respectively. Using the proboscis extension response paradigm, we found that an SFX dose of 15 ng/bee significantly impairs learning and memory retrieval when applied 12 h before conditioning or 24 h after olfactory conditioning. SFX had no effect on honeybee olfactory performance when exposure happened after the conditioning. Relative quantitative PCR experiments performed on the six nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits demonstrated that they are differently expressed in the honeybee brain after SFX exposure, whether before or after conditioning. We found that intoxicated bees with learning defects showed a strong expression of the Amelβ1 subunit. They displayed overexpression of Amelα9 and Amelβ2, and down-regulation of Amelα1, Amelα3 and Amelα7 subunits. These results demonstrated for the first time that a sublethal dose of SFX could affect honeybee learning and memory performance and modulate the expression of specific nAChR subunits in the brain.

Dissipation rates, residue distribution, degradation products, and degradation pathway of sulfoxaflor in broccoli

Broccoli was selected as the research object in this paper to reveal the dissipation, distribution, and degradation pathway of sulfoxaflor under greenhouse and open-field cultivation conditions for the ecological risk assessment of sulfoxaflor. Results showed that the dissipation of sulfoxaflor in broccoli leaves, flowers, stems, roots, and the whole broccoli was in accordance with the first-order kinetic equation. The sulfoxaflor concentration in broccoli roots reached the maximum value after 1 day of application and then gradually decreased. The degradation half-lives of sulfoxaflor in the roots, leaves, flowers, stems, and whole broccoli were between 2.3 and 19.8 days. The longest degradation half-life of sulfoxaflor was in Heilongjiang under greenhouse cultivation. The terminal residue of sulfoxaflor in broccoli was in the range of 0.005-0.029 mg/kg, and the proportion of sulfoxaflor residue in broccoli leaves was the largest. Thirteen transformation products were separated and identified by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and their kinetic evolution was studied. The cleavage of the N = S bond, C-S bond, C-O bond, and cyanide, as well as glucosylation, hydroxylation, SO extrusion, elimination, sulfhydrylation, ketonization, defluorination, and rearrangement, was inferred as the mechanism. Overall, these results can provide guidance for the supervision of the safe application of sulfoxaflor.

Innovation in insecticide discovery: Approaches to the discovery of new classes of insecticides

The continuing demand for agrochemical insecticides that can meet increasing grower, environmental, consumer and regulatory requirements creates the need for the development of new solutions for managing crop pest insects. The development of resistance to the currently available insecticidal products adds another critical driver for new insecticidal active ingredients (AIs). One avenue to meeting these challenges is the creation of new classes of insecticidal molecules to act as starting points and prototypes stimulating further spectrum, efficacy and environmental impact refinements. A new class of insecticides is foreshadowed by the first molecule exemplifying that class (first-in-class, FIC) and offers one measure of innovation within the agrochemical industry. Most insecticides owe their discovery to competitor-inspired (i.e. competitor patents/products) or next-generation (follow-on to a company's pre-existing product) strategies. In contrast, FIC insecticides primarily emerge from a bioactive hypothesis approach, with the largest segment resulting from the exploration of new areas of chemistry/heterocycles and underexploited motifs. Natural products also play an important role in the discovery of FIC insecticides. Understanding the origins of these FIC compounds and the approaches used in their discovery can provide insights into successful strategies for future FIC insecticides. This review analyses information on historic and recently introduced FIC insecticides. Its main objective has been to identify the most successful discovery strategies for identifying new agrochemical solutions to meet the challenge of minimizing crop losses resulting from insects. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.

Reproductive effects of sulfoxaflor in male Sprague Dawley rats

The study objective was to evaluate the potential reproductive toxicity of sulfoxaflor (SFX) insecticide in male Sprague Dawley rats. To attain these objectives, forty male Sprague Dawley rats of 10-12 weeks old were randomly divided into four equal groups; the 1st group was used as a control group; the other three groups were exposed to 25, 100, and 500 mg/kg body weight SFX by oral gavage for 4 weeks. Relative testicular weight, testosterone, FSH, LH, MDA, and GPx levels, sperm viability, sperm morphology, sperm DNA damage, and histopathological changes in testes, epididymis, and seminal vesical of these rats were investigated after 4 weeks. The results showed that SFX exposure resulted in a significant increase in FSH, LH, MDA, and GPx levels as well as the percentage of dead and abnormal sperms and DNA damage in rat sperms. Histopathological examination of testes established testicular degeneration with coagulative necrosis as well as the proliferation of interstitial connective tissue infiltrated with inflammatory cells with congestion of intertubular blood vessels in epididymis and degeneration of lining epithelium of seminal vesicles.

No effect of dual exposure to sulfoxaflor and a trypanosome parasite on bumblebee olfactory learning

Bees are important pollinators in wild and agricultural ecosystems, and understanding the factors driving their global declines is key to maintaining these pollination services. Learning, which has been a focus of previous ecotoxicological studies in bees, may play a key role in driving colony fitness. Here we move beyond the standard single-stressor approach to ask how multiple stressors, an agrochemical (sulfoxaflor, a relatively new insecticide) and a parasite (Crithidia bombi, a prevalent gut parasite of bumblebees), impact learning in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. We developed a modified version of the classic proboscis extension reflex assay to assess the combined effects of acute oral sulfoxaflor exposure and infection by C. bombi on olfactory learning of bumblebee workers. We found no evidence that either sulfoxaflor, C. bombi, or their combination had any significant effect on bumblebee olfactory learning, despite their known negative impacts on other aspects of bumblebee health. This suggests that losses in cognitive ability, as measured here, are unlikely to explain the impacts of sulfoxaflor and its interactions with other stressors on bumblebees. Our novel methodology provides a model system within which to test interactive effects of other key stressors on bee health.

Role of Insect Gut Microbiota in Pesticide Degradation: A Review

Insect pests cause significant agricultural and economic losses to crops worldwide due to their destructive activities. Pesticides are designed to be poisonous and are intentionally released into the environment to combat the menace caused by these noxious pests. To survive, these insects can resist toxic substances introduced by humans in the form of pesticides. According to recent findings, microbes that live in insect as symbionts have recently been found to protect their hosts against toxins. Symbioses that have been formed are between the pests and various microbes, a defensive mechanism against pathogens and pesticides. Insects' guts provide unique conditions for microbial colonization, and resident bacteria can deliver numerous benefits to their hosts. Insects vary significantly in their reliance on gut microbes for basic functions. Insect digestive tracts are very different in shape and chemical properties, which have a big impact on the structure and composition of the microbial community. Insect gut microbiota has been found to contribute to feeding, parasite and pathogen protection, immune response modulation, and pesticide breakdown. The current review will examine the roles of gut microbiota in pesticide detoxification and the mechanisms behind the development of resistance in insects to various pesticides. To better understand the detoxifying microbiota in agriculturally significant pest insects, we provided comprehensive information regarding the role of gut microbiota in the detoxification of pesticides.

Overexpression of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase and cytochrome P450 enzymes confers resistance to sulfoxaflor in field populations of the aphid, Myzus persicae

The green peach aphid, Myzus persicae, is a highly damaging, globally distributed crop pest that has evolved multiple resistance to numerous insecticides. It is thus imperative that insecticides that are not strongly compromised by pre-existing resistance are carefully managed to maximise their effective life span. Sulfoxaflor is a sulfoximine insecticide that retains efficacy against M. persicae clones that exhibit resistance to older insecticides. In the current study we monitored the efficacy of sulfoxaflor against M. persicae populations collected in Western Australia, following reports of control failures in this region. We identified clones with low (4-23-fold across multiple independent bioassay experiments), but significant, levels of resistance to sulfoxaflor compared with a reference susceptible clone. Furthermore, we demonstrate that sulfoxaflor resistance can persist after many months of culturing in the laboratory in the absence of insecticide exposure. Resistance was not conferred by known mechanisms of resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides, that act on the same target-site as sulfoxaflor, i.e. the R81T mutation or overexpresssion of the P450 gene CYP6CY3. Rather, transcriptome profiling of multiple resistant and susceptible clones identified the P450 CYP380C40 and the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase UGT344P2 as highly overexpressed (21-76-fold and 6-33-fold respectively) in the resistant clones. Transgenic expression of these genes demonstrated that they confer, low, but significant, levels of resistance to sulfoxaflor in vivo. Taken together, our data reveal the presence of low-level resistance to sulfoxaflor in M. persicae populations in Australia and uncover two novel mechanisms conferring resistance to this compound. The findings and tools generated in this study provide a platform for the development of strategies that aim to slow, prevent or overcome the evolution of more potent resistance to sulfoxaflor.