1
|
Lucic S, Spirovski M, Stojanovic D, Peter A, Licina J, Ivanov O, Milenovic N, Lucic MA. 18F-FDG PET/CT- and MRI-Based Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Early-Response Assessment after Concurrent Chemo- and Radiotherapy-Impact on Patient Outcomes and Survival Prediction. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1432. [PMID: 39001322 PMCID: PMC11241414 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14131432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2024] [Revised: 06/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
With one third of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) expected to develop cancer recurrence in the first two years after therapy, accurate assessment of the response and timely detection of cancer recurrence after concurrent chemo- and radiotherapy (CCRT) treatment is of great importance. Although there is neither definite consensus about the preferred imaging modality, nor the time interval until the first diagnostic examination after CCRT, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends the use of MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT as a post-treatment LACC response-assessment imaging tools. In this study, we tried to appraise the early therapy response in LACC patients by both 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in regard to the follow-up imaging results and their mutual interrelationship, and to ascertain if the post-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI results were related to the progression-free and overall survival rate in women with LACC after CCRT. We also aimed to estimate the early and follow-up diagnostic imaging impact on further therapy management. Based on our results, we concluded that 18F-FDG PET/CT did surpass MRI in the early assessment of therapeutic response in LACC patients after CCRT. Both modalities provided information that may serve as predictive biomarkers of outcome and LACC patients' survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvija Lucic
- Medical Faculty, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
- Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Milena Spirovski
- Medical Faculty, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
- Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
| | | | - Andrea Peter
- Medical Faculty, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
- Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Jelena Licina
- Medical Faculty, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
- Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Olivera Ivanov
- Medical Faculty, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
- Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
| | | | - Milos A Lucic
- Medical Faculty, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
- Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Olthof EP, Wenzel HHB, van der Velden J, Stalpers LJA, Mom CH, van der Aa MA. Treatment Strategies Guided by [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer and [18F]FDG-Positive Lymph Nodes. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:717. [PMID: 38398108 PMCID: PMC10887300 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Modern treatment guidelines for women with advanced cervical cancer recommend staging using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission computed tomography ([18F]FDG-PET/CT). However, the risk of false-positive nodes and therapy-related adverse events requires caution in treatment planning. Using data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR), we estimated the impact of [18F]FDG-PET/CT on treatment management in women with locally advanced cervical cancer, i.e., on nodal boosting, field extension, and/or debulking in cases of suspected lymph nodes. METHODS Women diagnosed between 2009 and 2017, who received chemoradiotherapy for International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (2009) stage IB2, IIA2-IVB cervical cancer with an [18F]FDG-positive node, were retrospectively selected from the NCR database. Patients with pathological nodal examination before treatment were excluded. The frequency of nodal boosting, extended-field radiotherapy, and debulking procedures applied to patients with [18F]FDG-positive lymph nodes was evaluated. RESULTS Among the 434 eligible patients with [18F]FDG-positive nodes, 380 (88%) received interventions targeting these lymph nodes: 84% of these 380 patients received nodal boosting, 78% extended-field radiotherapy, and 12% debulking surgery. [18F]FDG-positive nodes in patients receiving these treatments were more likely to be classified as suspicious than inconclusive (p = 0.009), located in the para-aortic region (p < 0.001), and larger (p < 0.001) than in patients who did not receive these treatments. CONCLUSION While existing guidelines advocate [18F]FDG-PET/CT-guided treatment planning for the management of advanced cervical cancer, this study highlights that not all cases of [18F]FDG-positive nodes received an intervention, possibly due to the risk of false-positive results. Improvement of nodal staging may reduce suboptimal treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester P. Olthof
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, 3511 LC Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.H.B.W.); (M.A.v.d.A.)
- Centre for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.v.d.V.); (C.H.M.)
| | - Hans H. B. Wenzel
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, 3511 LC Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.H.B.W.); (M.A.v.d.A.)
| | - Jacobus van der Velden
- Centre for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.v.d.V.); (C.H.M.)
| | - Lukas J. A. Stalpers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1055 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Constantijne H. Mom
- Centre for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.v.d.V.); (C.H.M.)
| | - Maaike A. van der Aa
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, 3511 LC Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.H.B.W.); (M.A.v.d.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Perrone AM, Dondi G, Coe M, Ferioli M, Telo S, Galuppi A, De Crescenzo E, Tesei M, Castellucci P, Nanni C, Fanti S, Morganti AG, De Iaco P. Predictive Role of MRI and 18F FDG PET Response to Concurrent Chemoradiation in T2b Cervical Cancer on Clinical Outcome: A Retrospective Single Center Study. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E659. [PMID: 32178252 PMCID: PMC7139894 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12030659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor response in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is generally evaluated with MRI and PET, but this strategy is not supported by the literature. Therefore, we compared the diagnostic performance of these two techniques in the response evaluation to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in LACC. Patients with cervical cancer (CC) stage T2b treated with CCRT and submitted to MRI and PET/CT before and after treatment were enrolled in the study. All clinical, pathological, therapeutic, radiologic and follow-up data were collected and examined. The radiological response was analyzed and compared to the follow-up data. Data of 40 patients with LACC were analyzed. Agreement between MRI and PET/CT in the evaluation response to therapy was observed in 31/40 (77.5%) of cases. The agreement between MRI, PET/CT and follow-up data showed a Cohen kappa coefficient of 0.59 (95% CI = 0.267-0.913) and of 0.84 (95% CI = 0.636-1.00), respectively. Considering the evaluation of primary tumor response, PET/CT was correct in 97.5% of cases, and MRI in 92.5% of cases; no false negative cases were observed. These results suggest the use of PET/CT as a unique diagnostic imaging tool after CCRT, to correctly assess residual and progression disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Myriam Perrone
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.D.); (E.D.C.); (M.T.); (P.D.I.)
- Centro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR) University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.G.); (S.F.); (A.G.M.)
| | - Giulia Dondi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.D.); (E.D.C.); (M.T.); (P.D.I.)
- Centro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR) University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.G.); (S.F.); (A.G.M.)
| | - Manuela Coe
- Department of Specialized, Diagnostic, and Experimental Medicine, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Martina Ferioli
- Radiotherapy Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Silvi Telo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.T.); (P.C.); (C.N.)
| | - Andrea Galuppi
- Centro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR) University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.G.); (S.F.); (A.G.M.)
- Radiotherapy Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Eugenia De Crescenzo
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.D.); (E.D.C.); (M.T.); (P.D.I.)
| | - Marco Tesei
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.D.); (E.D.C.); (M.T.); (P.D.I.)
- Centro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR) University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.G.); (S.F.); (A.G.M.)
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.T.); (P.C.); (C.N.)
| | - Cristina Nanni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.T.); (P.C.); (C.N.)
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Centro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR) University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.G.); (S.F.); (A.G.M.)
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.T.); (P.C.); (C.N.)
| | - Alessio G. Morganti
- Centro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR) University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.G.); (S.F.); (A.G.M.)
- Radiotherapy Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Pierandrea De Iaco
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.D.); (E.D.C.); (M.T.); (P.D.I.)
- Centro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR) University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.G.); (S.F.); (A.G.M.)
| |
Collapse
|