1
|
Olthof EP, Wenzel HHB, van der Velden J, Stalpers LJA, Mom CH, van der Aa MA. Treatment Strategies Guided by [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer and [18F]FDG-Positive Lymph Nodes. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:717. [PMID: 38398108 PMCID: PMC10887300 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Modern treatment guidelines for women with advanced cervical cancer recommend staging using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission computed tomography ([18F]FDG-PET/CT). However, the risk of false-positive nodes and therapy-related adverse events requires caution in treatment planning. Using data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR), we estimated the impact of [18F]FDG-PET/CT on treatment management in women with locally advanced cervical cancer, i.e., on nodal boosting, field extension, and/or debulking in cases of suspected lymph nodes. METHODS Women diagnosed between 2009 and 2017, who received chemoradiotherapy for International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (2009) stage IB2, IIA2-IVB cervical cancer with an [18F]FDG-positive node, were retrospectively selected from the NCR database. Patients with pathological nodal examination before treatment were excluded. The frequency of nodal boosting, extended-field radiotherapy, and debulking procedures applied to patients with [18F]FDG-positive lymph nodes was evaluated. RESULTS Among the 434 eligible patients with [18F]FDG-positive nodes, 380 (88%) received interventions targeting these lymph nodes: 84% of these 380 patients received nodal boosting, 78% extended-field radiotherapy, and 12% debulking surgery. [18F]FDG-positive nodes in patients receiving these treatments were more likely to be classified as suspicious than inconclusive (p = 0.009), located in the para-aortic region (p < 0.001), and larger (p < 0.001) than in patients who did not receive these treatments. CONCLUSION While existing guidelines advocate [18F]FDG-PET/CT-guided treatment planning for the management of advanced cervical cancer, this study highlights that not all cases of [18F]FDG-positive nodes received an intervention, possibly due to the risk of false-positive results. Improvement of nodal staging may reduce suboptimal treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester P. Olthof
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, 3511 LC Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.H.B.W.); (M.A.v.d.A.)
- Centre for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.v.d.V.); (C.H.M.)
| | - Hans H. B. Wenzel
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, 3511 LC Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.H.B.W.); (M.A.v.d.A.)
| | - Jacobus van der Velden
- Centre for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.v.d.V.); (C.H.M.)
| | - Lukas J. A. Stalpers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1055 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Constantijne H. Mom
- Centre for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.v.d.V.); (C.H.M.)
| | - Maaike A. van der Aa
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, 3511 LC Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.H.B.W.); (M.A.v.d.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Olthof EP, Bergink-Voorthuis BJ, Wenzel HHB, Mongula J, van der Velden J, Spijkerboer AM, Adam JA, Bekkers RLM, Beltman JJ, Slangen BFM, Nijman HW, Smolders RGV, van Trommel NE, Zusterzeel PLM, Zweemer RP, Stalpers LJA, Mom CH, van der Aa MA. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI, CT, and [ 18F]FDG-PET-CT in detecting lymph node metastases in clinically early-stage cervical cancer - a nationwide Dutch cohort study. Insights Imaging 2024; 15:36. [PMID: 38332397 PMCID: PMC10853153 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-023-01589-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Imaging is increasingly used to assess lymph node involvement in clinically early-stage cervical cancer. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI, CT, and [18F]FDG-PET-CT. METHODS Women with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer and pretreatment imaging between 2009 and 2017 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient-based and region-based (i.e. pelvic and common iliac) nodal status was extracted from radiology reports. Pathology results were considered the reference standard for calculating accuracy indices. Multiple imputation was used for missing pathology to limit verification bias risk. RESULTS Nodal assessment was performed in 1676 patients with MRI, 926 with CT, and 379 with [18F]FDG-PET-CT, with suspicious nodes detected in 17%, 16%, and 48%, respectively. [18F]FDG-PET-CT was used to confirm MRI/CT results in 95% of patients. Pathology results were imputed for 30% of patients. [18F]FDG-PET-CT outperformed MRI and CT in detecting patient-based nodal metastases with sensitivities of 80%, 48%, and 40%, and AUCs of 0.814, 0.706, and 0.667, respectively, but not in specificity: 79%, 92%, and 92%. Region-based analyses showed similar indices in the pelvic region, but worse performance in the common iliac region with AUCs of 0.575, 0.554, and 0.517, respectively. CONCLUSIONS [18F]FDG-PET-CT outperformed MRI and CT in detecting nodal metastases, which may be related to its use as a verification modality. However, MRI and CT had the highest specificity. As MRI is generally performed routinely to assess local and regional spread of cervical cancer, [18F]FDG-PET-CT can be used to confirm suspicious nodes. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Accurate assessment of the nodal status in clinically early-stage cervical cancer is essential for tumour staging, treatment decision making and prognosis. KEY POINTS • The accuracy of MRI, CT or [18F]FDG-PET-CT for nodal staging in early cervical cancer is a subject of discussion. • Overall, [18F]FDG-PET-CT outperformed MRI, followed by CT, when used as a verification modality. • Staging with MRI and the addition of [18F]FDG-PET-CT to verify high-risk cases seems to be a good approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester P Olthof
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, DT, Utrecht, 3511, The Netherlands.
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Brenda J Bergink-Voorthuis
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Hans H B Wenzel
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, DT, Utrecht, 3511, The Netherlands
| | - Jordy Mongula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus van der Velden
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anje M Spijkerboer
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judit A Adam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud L M Bekkers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Center and GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jogchum J Beltman
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Brigitte F M Slangen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Center and GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hans W Nijman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ramon G V Smolders
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke E van Trommel
- Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petra L M Zusterzeel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lukas J A Stalpers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Constantijne H Mom
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike A van der Aa
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, DT, Utrecht, 3511, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Servayge J, Olthof EP, Mom CH, van der Aa MA, Wenzel HHB, van der Velden J, Nout RA, Boere IA, van Doorn HC, van Beekhuizen HJ. Survival of Women with Advanced Stage Cervical Cancer: Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radiotherapy and Hyperthermia versus Chemoradiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:635. [PMID: 38339386 PMCID: PMC10854526 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM To investigate and compare overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and toxicity of women who underwent either chemoradiotherapy with or without prior lymph node debulking or upfront chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy and hyperthermia (triple therapy) for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) to identify a potential role for triple therapy. METHODS Women with histologically proven LACC and with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IB2 and IIA2 to IVA were included. Cox regression analyses were used for calculating hazard ratios and to adjust for confounding variables. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the influence of covariates on toxicity. RESULTS A total of 370 patients were included of whom 58% (n = 213) received chemoradiotherapy (CRT), 18% (n = 66) received node-debulking followed by chemoradiotherapy (LND-CRT) and 25% (n = 91) received triple therapy (TT). Five-year OS was comparable between the three treatment groups, with 53% (95% confidence interval 46-59%) in the CRT group, 45% (33-56%) in the LND-CRT group and 53% (40-64%) in the TT group (p = 0.472). In the adjusted analysis, 5-year OS and DFS were comparable between the three treatment groups. No chemotherapy-related differences in toxicity were observed. CONCLUSION This study suggests that the toxicity and survival of TT is similar to CRT or LND-CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Servayge
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ester P. Olthof
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Centre for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), 3501 DB Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Constantijne H. Mom
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Centre for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike A. van der Aa
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), 3501 DB Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hans H. B. Wenzel
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), 3501 DB Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus van der Velden
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Centre for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Remi A. Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid A. Boere
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Helena C. van Doorn
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Heleen J. van Beekhuizen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schuurman TN, Schaafsma M, To KH, Verhoef VMJ, Sikorska K, Siebers AG, Wenzel HHB, Bleeker MCG, Roes EM, Zweemer RP, de Vos van Steenwijk PJ, Yigit R, Beltman JJ, Zusterzeel PLM, Lok CAR, Bekkers RLM, Mom CH, van Trommel NE. Optimising follow-up strategy based on cytology and human papillomavirus after fertility-sparing surgery for early stage cervical cancer: a nationwide, population-based, retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:1349-1358. [PMID: 37952541 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00467-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal follow-up strategy to detect recurrence after fertility-sparing surgery for early stage cervical cancer is unknown. Tailored surveillance based on individual risks could contribute to improved efficiency and, subsequently, reduce costs in health care. The aim of this study was to establish the predictive value of cervical cytology and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing to detect recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+; including recurrent cervical cancer) after fertility-sparing surgery. METHODS In this nationwide, population-based, retrospective cohort study, we used data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank. All patients aged 18-40 years with cervical cancer of any histology who received fertility-sparing surgery (ie, large loop excision of the transformation zone, conisation, or trachelectomy) between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2020, were included. Pathology data from diagnosis, treatment, and during follow-up were analysed. The primary and secondary outcomes were the cumulative incidence of recurrent CIN2+ and recurrence-free survival, overall and stratified by results for cytology and high-risk HPV. FINDINGS 1548 patients were identified, of whom 1462 met the inclusion criteria. Of these included patients, 19 568 pathology reports were available. The median age at diagnosis was 31 years (IQR 30-35). After a median follow-up of 6·1 years (IQR 3·3-10·8), recurrent CIN2+ was diagnosed in 128 patients (cumulative incidence 15·0%, 95% CI 11·5-18·2), including 52 patients (cumulative incidence 5·4%, 95% CI 3·7-7·0) with recurrent cervical cancer. The overall 10-year recurrence-free survival for CIN2+ was 89·3% (95% CI 87·4-91·3). By cytology at first follow-up visit within 12 months after fertility-sparing surgery, 10-year recurrence-free survival for CIN2+ was 92·1% (90·2-94·1) in patients with normal cytology, 84·6% (77·4-92·3) in those with low-grade cytology, and 43·1% (26·4-70·2) in those with high-grade cytology. By high-risk HPV status at first follow-up visit within 12 months after surgery, 10-year recurrence-free survival for CIN2+ was 91·1% (85·3-97·3) in patients who were negative for high-risk HPV and 73·6% (58·4-92·8) in those who were positive for high-risk HPV. Cumulative incidence of recurrent CIN2+ within 6 months after any follow-up visit (6-24 months) in patients negative for high-risk HPV with normal or low-grade cytology was 0·0-0·7% and with high-grade cytology was 0·0-33·3%. Cumulative incidence of recurrence in patients positive for high-risk HPV with normal or low-grade cytology were 0·0-15·4% and with high-grade cytology were 50·0-100·0%. None of the patients who were negative for high-risk HPV without high-grade cytology, at 6 months and 12 months, developed recurrence. INTERPRETATION Patients who are negative for high-risk HPV with normal or low-grade cytology at 6-24 months after fertility-sparing surgery, could be offered a prolonged follow-up interval of 6 months. This group comprises 80% of all patients receiving fertility-sparing surgery. An interval of 12 months seems to be safe after two consecutive negative tests for high-risk HPV with an absence of high-grade cytology, which accounts for nearly 75% of all patients who receive fertility-sparing surgery. FUNDING KWF Dutch Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teska N Schuurman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, location Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, location Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mirte Schaafsma
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, location Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Kaylee H To
- Faculty of Medicine, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Viola M J Verhoef
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Karolina Sikorska
- Department of Biostatistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Albert G Siebers
- Palga, the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank, Houten, Netherlands
| | - Hans H B Wenzel
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Maaike C G Bleeker
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eva Maria Roes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Peggy J de Vos van Steenwijk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center and GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Refika Yigit
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jogchum J Beltman
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Petra L M Zusterzeel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Christianne A R Lok
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, location Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ruud L M Bekkers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center and GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Constantijne H Mom
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, location Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nienke E van Trommel
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, location Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wenzel HHB, Hardie AN, Moncada-Torres A, Høgdall CK, Bekkers RLM, Falconer H, Jensen PT, Nijman HW, van der Aa MA, Martin F, van Gestel AJ, Lemmens VEPP, Dahm-Kähler P, Alfonzo E, Persson J, Ekdahl L, Salehi S, Frøding LP, Markauskas A, Fuglsang K, Schnack TH. A federated approach to identify women with early-stage cervical cancer at low risk of lymph node metastases. Eur J Cancer 2023; 185:61-68. [PMID: 36965329 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Lymph node metastases (pN+) in presumed early-stage cervical cancer negatively impact prognosis. Using federated learning, we aimed to develop a tool to identify a group of women at low risk of pN+, to guide the shared decision-making process concerning the extent of lymph node dissection. METHODS Women with cervical cancer between 2005 and 2020 were identified retrospectively from population-based registries: the Danish Gynaecological Cancer Database, Swedish Quality Registry for Gynaecologic Cancer and Netherlands Cancer Registry. Inclusion criteria were: squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma; The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 IA2, IB1 and IIA1; treatment with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node assessment. We applied privacy-preserving federated logistic regression to identify risk factors of pN+. Significant factors were used to stratify the risk of pN+. RESULTS We included 3606 women (pN+ 11%). The most important risk factors of pN+ were lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (odds ratio [OR] 5.16, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.59-5.79), tumour size 21-40 mm (OR 2.14, 95% CI, 1.89-2.43) and depth of invasion>10 mm (OR 1.81, 95% CI, 1.59-2.08). A group of 1469 women (41%)-with tumours without LVSI, tumour size ≤20 mm, and depth of invasion ≤10 mm-had a very low risk of pN+ (2.4%, 95% CI, 1.7-3.3%). CONCLUSION Early-stage cervical cancer without LVSI, a tumour size ≤20 mm and depth of invasion ≤10 mm, confers a low risk of pN+. Based on an international privacy-preserving analysis, we developed a useful tool to guide the shared decision-making process regarding lymph node dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans H B Wenzel
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Anna N Hardie
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Arturo Moncada-Torres
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Claus K Høgdall
- Department of Gynaecology, Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ruud L M Bekkers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Henrik Falconer
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pernille T Jensen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Hans W Nijman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike A van der Aa
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Martin
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anna J van Gestel
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Valery E P P Lemmens
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pernilla Dahm-Kähler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Emilia Alfonzo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jan Persson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lund, Sweden
| | - Linnea Ekdahl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sahar Salehi
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ligita P Frøding
- Department of Gynaecology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Katrine Fuglsang
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Tine H Schnack
- Department of Gynaecology, Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Gynaecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
De Decker K, Wenzel HHB, Bart J, van der Aa MA, Kruitwagen RFPM, Nijman HW, Kruse A. Stage, treatment and survival of low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma in the Netherlands: A nationwide study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2023; 102:246-256. [PMID: 36734363 PMCID: PMC9951382 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Serous ovarian carcinomas constitute the largest group of epithelial ovarian cancer (60%-75%) and are further classified into high- and low-grade serous carcinoma. Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) is a relatively rare subtype (approximately 5% of serous carcinomas) and epidemiologic studies of large cohorts are scarce. With the present study we aimed to report trends in stage, primary treatment and relative survival of LGSC of the ovary in a large cohort of patients in an effort to identify opportunities to improve clinical practice and outcome of this relatively rare disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with LGSC between 2000 and 2019 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (n = 855). Trends in FIGO stages and primary treatment were analyzed with the Cochran-Armitage trend test, and differences in and trends of 5-year relative survival were analyzed using multivariable Poisson regression. RESULTS Over time, LGSC was increasingly diagnosed as stage III (39.9%-59.0%) and IV disease (5.7%-14.4%) and less often as stage I (34.6%-13.5%; p < 0.001). Primary debulking surgery was the most common strategy (76.2%), although interval debulking surgery was preferred more often over the years (10.6%-31.1%; p < 0.001). Following primary surgery, there was >1 cm residual disease in only 15/252 patients (6%), compared with 17/95 patients (17.9%) after interval surgery. Full cohort 5-year survival was 61% and survival after primary debulking surgery was superior to the outcome following interval debulking surgery (60% vs 34%). Survival following primary debulking surgery without macroscopic residual disease (73%) was better compared with ≤1 cm (47%) and >1 cm residual disease (22%). Survival following interval debulking surgery without macroscopic residual disease (51%) was significantly higher than after >1 cm residual disease (24%). Except FIGO stage II (85%-92%), survival did not change significantly over time. CONCLUSIONS Over the years, LGSC has been diagnosed as FIGO stage III and stage IV disease more often and interval debulking surgery has been increasingly preferred over primary debulking in these patients. Relative survival did not change over time (except for stage II) and worse survival outcomes after interval debulking surgery were observed. The results support the common recommendation to perform primary debulking surgery in patients eligible for primary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen De Decker
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyIsala HospitalZwolleThe Netherlands,Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Hans H. B. Wenzel
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands,Department of Research & DevelopmentNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer OrganizationUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Joost Bart
- Department of Pathology and Medical BiologyUniversity of GroningenUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Maaike A. van der Aa
- Department of Research & DevelopmentNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer OrganizationUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Roy F. P. M. Kruitwagen
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands,GROW ‐ School for Oncology and ReproductionUniversity of MaastrichtMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Hans W. Nijman
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Arnold‐Jan Kruse
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyIsala HospitalZwolleThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Olthof EP, Mom CH, Snijders MLH, Wenzel HHB, van der Velden J, van der Aa MA. The prognostic value of the number of positive lymph nodes and the lymph node ratio in early-stage cervical cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2022; 101:550-557. [PMID: 35218205 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To establish the impact of the number of lymph node metastases (nLNM) and the lymph node ratio (LNR) on survival in patients with early-stage cervical cancer after surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this nationwide historical cohort study, all women diagnosed between 1995 and 2020 with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IA2-IIA1 cervical cancer and nodal metastases after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy from the Netherlands Cancer Registry were selected. Optimal cut-offs for prognostic stratification by nLNM and LNR were calculated to categorize patients into low-risk or high-risk groups. Kaplan-Meier overall survival analysis and flexible parametric relative survival analysis were used to determine the impact of nLNM and LNR on survival. Missing data were imputed. RESULTS The optimal cut-off point was ≥4 for nLNM and ≥0.177 for LNR. Of the 593 women included, 500 and 501 (both 84%) were categorized into the low-risk and 93 and 92 (both 16%) into the high-risk groups for nLNM and LNR, respectively. Both high-risk groups had a worse 5-year overall survival (p < 0.001) compared with the low-risk groups. Being classified into the high-risk groups is an independent risk factor for relative survival, with excess hazard ratios of 2.4 (95% confidence interval 1.6-3.5) for nLNM and 2.5 (95% confidence interval 1.7-3.8) for LNR. CONCLUSIONS Presenting a patient's nodal status postoperatively by the number of positive nodes, or by the nodal ratio, can support further risk stratification regarding survival in the case of node-positive early-stage cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester P Olthof
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Gynecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Constantijne H Mom
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Malou L H Snijders
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans H B Wenzel
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus van der Velden
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike A van der Aa
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Olthof EP, van der Aa MA, Adam JA, Stalpers LJA, Wenzel HHB, van der Velden J, Mom CH. The role of lymph nodes in cervical cancer: incidence and identification of lymph node metastases-a literature review. Int J Clin Oncol 2021; 26:1600-1610. [PMID: 34241726 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01980-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Correct identification of patients with lymph node metastasis from cervical cancer prior to treatment is of great importance, because it allows more tailored therapy. Patients may be spared unnecessary surgery or extended field radiotherapy if the nodal status can be predicted correctly. This review captures the existing knowledge on the identification of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer. The risk of nodal metastases increases per 2009 FIGO stage, with incidences in the pelvic region ranging from 2% (stage IA2) to 14-36% (IB), 38-51% (IIA) and 47% (IIB); and in the para-aortic region ranging from 2 to 5% (stage IB), 10-20% (IIA), 9% (IIB), 13-30% (III) and 50% (IV). In addition, age, tumor size, lymph vascular space invasion, parametrial invasion, depth of stromal invasion, histological type, and histological grade are reported to be independent prognostic factors for the risk of nodal metastases. Furthermore, biomarkers can contribute to predict a patient's nodal status, of which the squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) is currently the most widely used in squamous cell cervical cancer. Still, pre-treatment lymph node assessment is primarily performed by imaging, of which diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging has the highest sensitivity and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission computed tomography the highest specificity. Imaging results can be combined with clinical parameters in nomograms to increase the accuracy of predicting positives nodes. Despite all the progress regarding pre-treatment prediction of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer in recent years, prediction rates are not robust enough to safely abandon surgical staging of the pelvic or para-aortic region yet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester P Olthof
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Postbus 19079, 3501 DB, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Maaike A van der Aa
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Judit A Adam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lukas J A Stalpers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans H B Wenzel
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus van der Velden
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Constantijne H Mom
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wenzel HHB, Bekkers RLM, Lemmens VEPP, Van der Aa MA, Nijman HW. No improvement in survival of older women with cervical cancer-A nationwide study. Eur J Cancer 2021; 151:159-167. [PMID: 33993062 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
AIM This study aims to report trends in primary treatment and survival in cervical cancer (CC) to identify opportunities to improve clinical practice and disease outcome. METHODS Patients diagnosed with CC between 1989 and 2018 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (N = 21,644). Trends in primary treatment and 5-year relative survival were analysed with the Cochran-Armitage trend test and multivariable Poisson regression, respectively. RESULTS In early CC, surgery remains the preferred treatment for ages 15-74. Overall, it was applied more often in younger than in older patients (92% in 15-44; 64% in 65-74). For 75+, surgery use was stable over time (38%-41%, p=0.368), while administration of radiotherapy decreased (57%-29%, p < 0.001). In locally advanced CC, chemoradiation use increased over time (5%-65%, p < 0.001). It was applied least often for 75+, in which radiotherapy remains most common (54% in 2014-2018). In metastatic CC, chemotherapy use increased over time (11%-28%, p < 0.001), but varied across age groups (6%-40% in 2014-2018). In patients treated with primary chemoradiation, regardless of stage, brachytherapy use increased over time (p ≤ 0.001). Full cohort 5-year survival increased from 68% to 74% (relative excess risk 0.55; 95% confidence interval [0.50-0.62]). Increases were most significant in locally advanced CC (38%-60%; 0.55 [0.47-0.65]). Survival remained stable in 75+ (38%-34%; 0.82 [0.66-1.02]). CONCLUSION Relative survival for cervical cancer increased over the last three decades. The proportion of older patients receiving preferred treatment lags behind. Consequently, survival did not improve in the oldest patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans H B Wenzel
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Ruud L M Bekkers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Valery E P P Lemmens
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike A Van der Aa
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hans W Nijman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wenzel HHB, Smolders RGV, Beltman JJ, Lambrechts S, Trum HW, Yigit R, Zusterzeel PLM, Zweemer RP, Mom CH, Bekkers RLM, Lemmens VEPP, Nijman HW, Van der Aa MA. Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a nationwide cohort study and literature review. Eur J Cancer 2020; 133:14-21. [PMID: 32422504 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
AIM Recently, the safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) has been called into question in early-stage cervical cancer. This study aimed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients treated with abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) and LRH for early-stage cervical cancer and to provide a literature review. METHODS Patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2017 with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (2009) stage IA2 with lymphovascular space invasion, IB1 and IIA1, were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Cox regression with propensity score, based on inverse probability treatment weighting, was applied to examine the effect of surgical approach on 5-year survival and calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Literature review included observational studies with (i) analysis on tumours ≤4 cm (ii) median follow-up ≥30 months (iii) ≥5 events per predictor parameter in multivariable analysis or a propensity score. RESULTS Of the 1109 patients, LRH was performed in 33%. Higher mortality (9.4% vs. 4.6%) and recurrence (13.1% vs. 7.3%) were observed in ARH than LRH. However, adjusted analyses showed similar DFS (89.4% vs. 90.2%), HR 0.92 [95% CI: 0.52-1.60]) and OS (95.2% vs. 95.5%), HR 0.94 [95% CI: 0.43-2.04]). Analyses on tumour size (<2/≥2 cm) also gave similar survival rates. Review of nine studies showed no distinct advantage of ARH, especially in tumours <2 cm. CONCLUSION After adjustment, our retrospective study showed equal oncological outcomes between ARH and LRH for early-stage cervical cancer - also in tumours <2 cm. This is in correspondence with results from our literature review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans H B Wenzel
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Ramon G V Smolders
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jogchum J Beltman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Sandrina Lambrechts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Hans W Trum
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Refika Yigit
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Petra L M Zusterzeel
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Constantijne H Mom
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ruud L M Bekkers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Valery E P P Lemmens
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hans W Nijman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike A Van der Aa
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wenzel HHB, Van Kol KGG, Nijman HW, Lemmens VEPP, Van der Aa MA, Ebisch RMF, Bekkers RLM. Cervical cancer with ≤5 mm depth of invasion and >7 mm horizontal spread - Is lymph node assessment only required in patients with LVSI? Gynecol Oncol 2020; 158:282-286. [PMID: 32381363 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cervical cancer with ≤5 mm depth of invasion and >7 mm horizontal spread is classified FIGO IA instead of FIGO IB in the revised staging system, as horizontal spread is no longer considered. We aimed to determine the incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and, consequently, the necessity of pelvic lymph node assessment. METHODS Patients diagnosed between January 2015 and May 2019 with cervical cancer FIGO (2009) stage IB with ≤5 mm depth of invasion and >7 mm horizontal spread, were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Associations between disease-characteristics and lymph node metastasis (LNM), and overall survival, were assessed. RESULTS Of 170 patients, six (3.5%) had LNM: 4/53 (7.6%) with adenocarcinoma and 2/117 (1.7%) with squamous cell carcinoma (p = .077). Four-year overall survival was 98.2%. LNM was observed more often in tumours with LVSI (4/43 patients, 9.3%) than without LVSI (2/117 patients, 1.7%) (p = .045). In adenocarcinoma with 3-5 mm depth of invasion LNM rate was 10% (4/40). None of the following tumours were observed with LNM: squamous cell carcinoma without LVSI (0/74); adenocarcinoma with <3 mm depth of invasion (0/13); <3 mm depth of invasion without LVSI (0/36). CONCLUSIONS Lymph node assessment is essential in any tumour with LVSI or in adenocarcinoma with 3-5 mm depth of invasion. It can be omitted in squamous cell carcinoma without LVSI, in adenocarcinoma with <3 mm depth of invasion and in any tumours without LVSI and with <3 mm depth of invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans H B Wenzel
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Kim G G Van Kol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catherina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Hans W Nijman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Valery E P P Lemmens
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike A Van der Aa
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Renée M F Ebisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catherina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Ruud L M Bekkers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catherina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wenzel HHB, Kruitwagen RFPM, Nijman HW, Bekkers RLM, van Gorp T, de Kroon CD, van Lonkhuijzen LRCW, Massuger LFAG, Smolders RGV, van Trommel NE, Yigit R, Zweemer RP, van der Aa MA. Short-term surgical complications after radical hysterectomy-A nationwide cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 99:925-932. [PMID: 31955408 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Centralization has, among other aspects, been argued to have an impact on quality of care in terms of surgical morbidity. Next, monitoring quality of care is essential in identifying areas of improvement. This nationwide cohort study was conducted to determine the rate of short-term surgical complications and to evaluate its possible predictors in women with early-stage cervical cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Women diagnosed with early-stage cervical cancer, 2009 FIGO stages IB1 and IIA1, between 2015 and 2017 who underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in 1 of the 9 specialized medical centers in the Netherlands, were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Women were excluded if primary treatment consisted of hysterectomy without parametrial dissection or radical trachelectomy. Women in whom radical hysterectomy was aborted during the procedure, were also excluded. Occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications and type of complications, developing within 30 days after surgery, were prospectively registered. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of surgical complications. RESULTS A total of 472 women were selected, of whom 166 (35%) developed surgical complications within 30 days after radical hysterectomy. The most frequent complications were urinary retention with catheterization in 73 women (15%) and excessive perioperative blood loss >1000 mL in 50 women (11%). Open surgery (odds ratio [OR] 3.42; 95% CI 1.73-6.76), chronic pulmonary disease (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.45-6.79), vascular disease (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.07-3.38), and medical center (OR 2.83; 95% CI 1.18-6.77) emerged as independent predictors of the occurrence of complications. Body mass index (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.89-1.00) was found as a negative predictor of urinary retention. Open surgery (OR 36.65; 95% CI 7.10-189.12) and body mass index (OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.08-1.22) were found to be independent predictors of excessive perioperative blood loss. CONCLUSIONS Short-term surgical complications developed in 35% of the women after radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in the Netherlands, a nation with centralized surgical care. Comorbidities predict surgical complications, and open surgery is associated with excessive perioperative blood loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans H B Wenzel
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Roy F P M Kruitwagen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Hans W Nijman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ruud L M Bekkers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Toon van Gorp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis D de Kroon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center-Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Ramon G V Smolders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nienke E van Trommel
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Refika Yigit
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike A van der Aa
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wenzel HHB, Veld RHI, Melman WPR, Havinga ME, Pakvis D. Psychological risk factors in back pain patients at an orthopaedic outpatient clinic. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2016; 30:BMR716. [PMID: 27257982 DOI: 10.3233/bmr-160716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychological risk factors have shown to be important prognostic indicators of back surgery outcome. Prevalence of these risk factors has rarely been examined in an outpatient clinic population. Furthermore, it is unclear to which extent they play a role, in absence of routinely used psychological screening tools, in treatment assignment. OBJECTIVE First aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of psychological risk factors in back pain patients at an orthopaedic outpatient clinic. Second aim was to investigate the prognostic value of these identified risk factors in treatment assignment by the orthopaedic surgeons (conservative vs. surgery). METHODS Sixty-six adult back pain patients were included. Psychological risk factor prevalence was determined with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia and Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Prognostic value of these risk factors in treatment assignment was examined using statistics. RESULTS Respectively, 30 (45% HADS Anxiety), 27 (41%, HADS Depression), 19 (29%, PCS) and 37 (56%, TSK) patients scored above cut-off. No prognostic value of risk factors in treatment assignment, was found. CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients in our study is at risk of poor surgical outcome due to presence of psychological risk factors. Future studies should target the development of screening tools for an early identification of those at risk.
Collapse
|