Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning

An evaluation of the current status of quality assurance program in MRI: A multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Quality Assurance Programs (QAPs) in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are essential for acquiring images that provide information for medical diagnosis and treatment. As part of a quality assurance program, quality control tests (QC) are conducted to ensure that high-quality images are acquired during the acquisition process. Implementing QAPs in MRI is crucial to ensuring diagnostic image acquisition and personnel safety.

METHODS

In this study, 21 indicators of compliance/non-compliance were used to evaluate the QAP in ten Mexican MRI facilities, through a documentary review. Also, nine QC tests were developed under ACR protocol in the MRIs scanners including 1.5 T and 3.0 T systems. The association of the QAP and QC tests results for MRI scanners was studied.

RESULTS

It was found that all facilities evaluated failed at least one of the QAP indicators. Only 20 % of the facilities achieved more than 90 % on all QAP indicators, while 30 % achieved 100 % acceptability in QC tests. The statistical analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between the QAP indicators and QC tests, particularly the room technical factors and MRI scanners.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that each MRI facility needs to improve QAP implementation and surveillance to establish QC reference values to enhance operational conditions and ensure consistent image quality throughout the facilities. It is imperative that the Mexican government update the legal framework regarding MRI safety in accordance with international recommendations and guidelines in order to ensure the implementation of QAPs in MRI facilities.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

As a result of standardizing protocols and monitoring reference values for image quality, the implementation of QA and QC indicators in MRI facilities may improve clinical practice and patient safety.

Evaluation and comparison of synthetic computed tomography algorithms with 3T MRI for prostate radiotherapy: AI-based versus bulk density method

PURPOSE

Synthetic computed tomography (sCT)-algorithms, which generate computed tomography images from magnetic resonance imaging data, are becoming part of the clinical radiotherapy workflow. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate and compare commercial bulk-density-method (BM)-based and AI (artificial intelligence)-based-algorithms using 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with patient data as part of the local clinical commissioning process.

METHODS

44 prostate radiotherapy patients were subjected to MRI and treatment planning CT (TPCT) scans. From the MRI images, sCT images with two different sCT algorithms were generated. The sCT images were evaluated by visual inspection of artifacts. Both sCT methods were compared to TPCT, with Dice similarity score(DSC) of bone and body contours, DVH parameters for CTV, bladder and rectum, and gamma-analysis. Accuracy for treatment alignment using sCT images was also tested. Various limits were used to define whether the differences between sCT methods to TPCT were clinically relevant (DVH parameters <2%, gamma-analysis passing rates 90%, 95%, and 98%, and the DSC 0.98 for body and 0.7 for bone).

RESULTS

Our results show that, differences in CTV-dose coverage values were <2% in most of the patients with both sCT algorithms when compared to reference dose coverage. While AI-sCT had mean dose coverage difference <0,5% and BM-sCT <1%. Gamma-analysis showed that the AI-sCT mean passing rates were 95.4%, 98.6%, and 99.4% with 1mm1%, 2mm2%, and 3mm3% criteria, respectively. Similarly for BM-sCT the mean passing rates were 93.4%, 98.2%, and 99.2%. For the treatment alignment accuracy, the mean difference in magnitude of the translational shifts was 1.43 mm for BM-sCT and 1.57 mm for AI-sCT. Even though AI-sCT showed statistically better correspondence to TPCT, the differences were not clinically relevant with any of the limits. Visual evaluation showed artifacts in the AI-sCT especially in the bowel area and fiducial markers were not generated with either of the sCT algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, sCT-algorithms were clinically usable on prostate treatments using 3T MR-only workflow. While AI-sCT showed better correspondence to TPCT than BM-sCT, it generated characteristic artifacts. As sCT algorithms perform well, we still recommend testing the sCT-algorithms with retrospective analyses from patient data prior to implementing sCT into the routine workflow to better understand the specific limitations and capabilities of these algorithms.

Geometrical accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for ocular proton therapy planning

Background & purpose

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in treatment preparation of ocular proton therapy, but its spatial accuracy might be limited by geometric distortions due to susceptibility artefacts. A correct geometry of the MR images is paramount since it defines where the dose will be delivered. In this study, we assessed the geometrical accuracy of ocular MRI.

Materials & methods

A dedicated ocular 3 T MRI protocol, with localized shimming and increased gradients, was compared to computed tomography (CT) and X-ray images in a phantom and in 15 uveal melanoma patients. The MRI protocol contained three-dimensional T2-weighted and T1-weighted sequences with an isotropic reconstruction resolution of 0.3-0.4 mm. Tantalum clips were identified by three observers and clip-clip distances were compared between T2-weighted and T1-weighted MRI, CT and X-ray images for the phantom and between MRI and X-ray images for the patients.

Results

Interobserver variability was below 0.35 mm for the phantom and 0.30(T1)/0.61(T2) mm in patients. Mean absolute differences between MRI and reference were below 0.27 ± 0.16 mm and 0.32 ± 0.23 mm for the phantom and in patients, respectively. In patients, clip-clip distances were slightly larger on MRI than on X-ray images (mean difference T1: 0.11 ± 0.38 mm, T2: 0.10 ± 0.44 mm). Differences did not increase at larger distances and did not correlate to interobserver variability.

Conclusions

A dedicated ocular MRI protocol can produce images of the eye with a geometrical accuracy below half the MRI acquisition voxel (<0.4 mm). Therefore, these images can be used for ocular proton therapy planning, both in the current model-based workflow and in proposed three-dimensional MR-based workflows.

Geometric distortion caused by metallic femoral head prosthesis in prostate cancer imaging on an MR Linac: in-vivo measurements of spatial deformation

OBJECTIVES

Metallic implants cause artefacts and distortion on MRI. To ensure accurate dose delivery and plan adaptation on an MR Linac, there is a need to evaluate distortion caused.

METHODS

Participants were imaged on an MR Linac (Elekta Unity, Elekta AB Stockholm). Three sequences were evaluated. Two vendor supplied (T2W TSE 3D), and one T2W TSE 3D optimized to reduce metal artefact distortions. Images were rigidly registered to CT images by a single observer, using bony anatomy. Three coronal and three axial images were selected, and six paired, adjacent, bony landmarks were identified on each slice. Images bisecting treatment isocentre were included. Difference between landmark coordinates was taken to be measure of distortion.

RESULTS

Five observers participated. Thirty six pairs of bony landmarks were identified. Median difference in position of landmarks was ≤3 mm (range 0.3-4.4 mm). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) between observer means showed no significant variation between sequences or patients (P = 1.26 in plane, P = 0.11 through plane). Interobserver intra class correlation (ICC) was 0.70 in-plane and 0.78 through-plane. Intra-observer ICC for three observers was 0.76, 0.81, 0.83, showing moderate to good reliability on this small cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This in-vivo feasibility study suggests distortion due to metallic hip prosthesis is not an obstacle for pelvic radiotherapy on an MR Linac. Research on the impact on plan quality is warranted.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This work supports feasibility of treating patients with metallic hip prosthesis on an MR Linac.

Impact of magnetic resonance imaging-related geometric distortion of dose distribution in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE

The geometric distortion related to magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in a diagnostic radiology (MRDR) and radiotherapy (MRRT) setup is evaluated, and the dosimetric impact of MR distortion on fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) in patients with brain metastases is simulated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An anthropomorphic skull phantom was scanned using a 1.5‑T MR scanner, and the magnitude of MR distortion was calculated with (MRDR-DC and MRRT-DC) and without (MRDR-nDC and MRRT-nDC) distortion-correction algorithms. Automated noncoplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (HyperArc, HA; Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) plans were generated for 53 patients with 186 brain metastases. The MR distortion at each gross tumor volume (GTV) was calculated using the distance between the center of the GTV and the MR image isocenter (MIC) and the quadratic regression curve derived from the phantom study (MRRT-DC and MRRT-nDC). Subsequently, the radiation isocenter of the HA plans was shifted according to the MR distortion at each GTV (HADC and HAnDC).

RESULTS

The median MR distortions were approximately 0.1 mm when the distance from the MIC was < 30 mm, whereas the median distortion varied widely when the distance was > 60 mm (0.23, 0.47, 0.37, and 0.57 mm in MRDR-DC, MRDR-nDC, MRRT-DC, and MRRT-nDC, respectively). The dose to the 98% of the GTV volume (D98%) decreased as the distance from the MIC increased. In the HADC plans, the relative dose difference of D98% was less than 5% when the GTV was located within 70 mm from the MIC, whereas the underdose of GTV exceeded 5% when it was 48 mm (-26.5% at maximum) away from the MIC in the HAnDC plans.

CONCLUSION

Use of a distortion-correction algorithm in the studied MR diagnoses is essential, and the dosimetric impact of MR distortion is not negligible, particularly for tumors located far away from the MIC.

Geometric distortions in clinical MRI sequences for radiotherapy: insights gained from a multicenter investigation

BACKGROUND

As magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) becomes increasingly integrated into radiotherapy (RT) for enhanced treatment planning and adaptation, the inherent geometric distortion in acquired MR images pose a potential challenge to treatment accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the geometric distortion levels in the clinical MRI protocols used across Danish RT centers and discuss influence of specific sequence parameters. Based on the variety in geometric performance across centers, we assess if harmonization of MRI sequences is a relevant measure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine centers participated with 12 MRI scanners and MRI-Linacs (MRL). Using a travelling phantom approach, a reference MRI sequence was used to assess variation in baseline distortion level between scanners. The phantom was also scanned with local clinical MRI sequences for brain, head/neck (H/N), abdomen, and pelvis. The influence of echo time, receiver bandwidth, image weighting, and 2D/3D acquisition was investigated.

RESULTS

We found a large variation in geometric accuracy across 93 clinical sequences examined, exceeding the baseline variation found between MRI scanners (σ = 0.22 mm), except for abdominal sequences where the variation was lower. Brain and abdominal sequences showed lowest distortion levels ([0.22, 2.26] mm), and a large variation in performance was found for H/N and pelvic sequences ([0.19, 4.07] mm). Post hoc analyses revealed that distortion levels decreased with increasing bandwidth and a less clear increase in distortion levels with increasing echo time. 3D MRI sequences had lower distortion levels than 2D (median of 1.10 and 2.10 mm, respectively), and in DWI sequences, the echo-planar imaging read-out resulted in highest distortion levels.

CONCLUSION

There is a large variation in the geometric distortion levels of clinical MRI sequences across Danish RT centers, and between anatomical sites. The large variation observed makes harmonization of MRI sequences across institutions and adoption of practices from well-performing anatomical sites, a relevant measure within RT.

AAPM medical physics practice guideline 13.a: HDR brachytherapy, part A

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) is a nonprofit professional society whose primary purposes are to advance the science, education, and professional practice of medical physics. The AAPM has more than 8000 members and is the principal organization of medical physicists in the United States. The AAPM will periodically define new practice guidelines for medical physics practice to help advance the science of medical physics and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the United States. Existing medical physics practice guidelines (MPPGs) will be reviewed for the purpose of revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner. Each medical physics practice guideline represents a policy statement by the AAPM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review, and requires the approval of the Professional Council. The medical physics practice guidelines recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic and therapeutic radiology requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guidelines and technical standards by those entities not providing these services is not authorized. The following terms are used in the AAPM practice guidelines: (1) Must and must not: Used to indicate that adherence to the recommendation is considered necessary to conform to this practice guideline. (2) Should and should not: Used to indicate a prudent practice to which exceptions may occasionally be made in appropriate circumstances. Approved by AAPM's Executive Committee April 28, 2022.

Time-course assessment of 3D-image distortion on the 1.5 T Marlin/Elekta Unity MR-LINAC

PURPOSE

The efficacy of MR-guided radiotherapy on a MR-LINAC (MR-L) is dependent on the geometric accuracy of its MR images over clinically relevant Fields-of-View (FOVs). Our objectives were to: evaluate gradient non-linearity (GNL) on the Elekta Unity MR-L across time via 76 weekly measurements of 3D-distortion over concentrically larger diameter spherical volumes (DSVs); quantify distortion measurement error; and assess the temporal stability of spatial distortion using statistical process control (SPC).

METHODS

MR-image distortion was assessed using a large-FOV 3D-phantom containing 1932 markers embedded in seven parallel plates, spaced 25 mm × 25 mm in- and 55 mm through-plane. Automatically analyzed T1 images yielded distortions in 200, 300, 400 and 500 mm concentric DSVs. Distortion measurement error was evaluated using median absolute difference analysis of imaging repeatability tests.

RESULTS

Over the measurement period absolute time-averaged distortion varied between: dr = 0.30 - 0.49 mm, 0.53 - 0.80 mm, 1.0 - 1.4 mm and 2.28 - 2.37 mm, for DSVs 200, 300, 400 and 500 mm at the 98^th percentile level. Repeatability tests showed that imaging/repositioning introduces negligible error: mean ≤ 0.02 mm (max ≤ 0.3 mm). SPC analysis showed image distortion was stable across all DSVs; however, noticeable changes in GNL were observed following servicing at the one-year mark.

CONCLUSIONS

Image distortion on the MR-L is in the sub-millimeter range for DSVs ≤ 300 mm and stable across time, with SPC analysis indicating all measurements remain within control for each DSV.

Motion modeling from 4D MR images of liver simulating phantom

Background and purpose

A novel method of retrospective liver modeling was developed based on four‐dimensional magnetic resonance (4D‐MR) images. The 4D‐MR images will be utilized in generation of the subject‐specific deformable liver model to be used in radiotherapy planning (RTP). The purpose of this study was to test and validate the developed 4D‐magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method with extensive phantom tests. We also aimed to build a motion model with image registration methods from liver simulating phantom images.

Materials and methods

A deformable phantom was constructed by combining deformable tissue‐equivalent material and a programmable 4D CIRS‐platform. The phantom was imaged in 1.5 T MRI scanner with T2‐weighted 4D SSFSE and T1‐weighted Ax dual‐echo Dixon SPGR sequences, and in computed tomography (CT). In addition, geometric distortion of the 4D sequence was measured with a GRADE phantom. The motion model was developed; the phases of the 4D‐MRI were used as surrogate data, and displacement vector fields (DVF's) were used as a motion measurement. The motion model and the developed 4D‐MRI method were evaluated and validated with extensive tests.

Result

The 4D‐MRI method enabled an accuracy of 2 mm using our deformable phantom compared to the 4D‐CT. Results showed a mean accuracy of <2 mm between coordinates and DVF's measured from the 4D images. Three‐dimensional geometric accuracy results with the GRADE phantom were: 0.9‐mm mean and 2.5 mm maximum distortion within a 100 mm distance, and 2.2 mm mean, 5.2 mm maximum distortion within a 150 mm distance from the isocenter.

Conclusions

The 4D‐MRI method was validated with phantom tests as a necessary step before patient studies. The subject‐specific motion model was generated and will be utilized in the generation of the deformable liver model of patients to be used in RTP.