1
|
Chiloiro G, Panza G, Boldrini L, Romano A, Placidi L, Nardini M, Galetto M, Votta C, Campitelli M, Cellini F, Massaccesi M, Gambacorta MA. REPeated mAgnetic resonance Image-guided stereotactic body Radiotherapy (MRIg-reSBRT) for oligometastatic patients: REPAIR, a mono-institutional retrospective study. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:52. [PMID: 38671526 PMCID: PMC11055272 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02445-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oligo-progression or further recurrence is an open issue in the multi-integrated management of oligometastatic disease (OMD). Re-irradiation with stereotactic body radiotherapy (re-SBRT) technique could represent a valuable treatment option to improve OMD clinical outcomes. MRI-guided allows real-time visualization of the target volumes and online adaptive radiotherapy (oART). The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity profile of MRI-guided repeated SBRT (MRIg-reSBRT) in the OMD setting and propose a re-SBRT classification. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients (pts) with recurrent liver metastases or abdominal metastatic lesions between 1 and 5 centimeters from liver candidate to MRIg-reSBRT showing geometric overlap between the different SBRT courses and assessing whether they were in field (type 1) or not (type 2). RESULTS Eighteen pts completed MRIg-reSBRT course for 25 metastatic hepatic/perihepatic lesions from July 2019 to January 2020. A total of 20 SBRT courses: 15 Type 1 re-SBRT (75%) and 5 Type 2 re-SBRT (25%) was delivered. Mean interval between the first SBRT and MRIg-reSBRT was 8,6 months. Mean prescribed dose for the first treatment was 43 Gy (range 24-50 Gy, mean BEDα/β10=93), while 41 Gy (range 16-50 Gy, mean BEDα/β10=92) for MRIg-reSBRT. Average liver dose was 3,9 Gy (range 1-10 Gy) and 3,7 Gy (range 1,6-8 Gy) for the first SBRT and MRIg-reSBRT, respectively. No acute or late toxicities were reported at a median follow-up of 10,7 months. The 1-year OS and PFS was 73,08% and 50%, respectively. Overall Clinical Benefit was 54%. CONCLUSIONS MRIg-reSBRT could be considered an effective and safe option in the multi-integrated treatment of OMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuditta Chiloiro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Panza
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Romano
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Placidi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Nardini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Galetto
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Votta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maura Campitelli
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Cellini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Votta C, Iacovone S, Turco G, Carrozzo V, Vagni M, Scalia A, Chiloiro G, Meffe G, Nardini M, Panza G, Placidi L, Romano A, Cornacchione P, Gambacorta MA, Boldrini L. Evaluation of clinical parallel workflow in online adaptive MR-guided Radiotherapy: A detailed assessment of treatment session times. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100239. [PMID: 38405058 PMCID: PMC10883837 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Advancements in MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) enable clinical parallel workflows (CPW) for online adaptive planning (oART), allowing medical physicists (MPs), physicians (MDs), and radiation therapists (RTTs) to perform their tasks simultaneously. This study evaluates the impact of this upgrade on the total treatment time by analyzing each step of the current 0.35T-MRgRT workflow. Methods The time process of the workflow steps for 254 treatment fractions in 0.35 MRgRT was examined. Patients have been grouped based on disease site, breathing modality (BM) (BHI or FB), and fractionation (stereotactic body RT [SBRT] or standard fractionated long course [LC]). The time spent for the following workflow steps in Adaptive Treatment (ADP) was analyzed: Patient Setup Time (PSt), MRI Acquisition and Matching (MRt), MR Re-contouring Time (RCt), Re-Planning Time (RPt), Treatment Delivery Time (TDt). Also analyzed was the timing of treatments that followed a Simple workflow (SMP), without the online re-planning (PSt + MRt + TDt.). Results The time analysis revealed that the ADP workflow (median: 34 min) is significantly (p < 0.05) longer than the SMP workflow (19 min). The time required for ADP treatments is significantly influenced by TDt, constituting 40 % of the total time. The oART steps (RCt + RPt) took 11 min (median), representing 27 % of the entire procedure. Overall, 79.2 % of oART fractions were completed in less than 45 min, and 30.6 % were completed in less than 30 min. Conclusion This preliminary analysis, along with the comparative assessment against existing literature, underscores the potential of CPW to diminish the overall treatment duration in MRgRT-oART. Additionally, it suggests the potential for CPW to promote a more integrated multidisciplinary approach in the execution of oART.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Votta
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Sara Iacovone
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Gabriele Turco
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Valerio Carrozzo
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Marica Vagni
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Giuditta Chiloiro
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Guenda Meffe
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Matteo Nardini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Giulia Panza
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Placidi
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Angela Romano
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Patrizia Cornacchione
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boldrini L, D'Aviero A, De Felice F, Desideri I, Grassi R, Greco C, Iorio GC, Nardone V, Piras A, Salvestrini V. Artificial intelligence applied to image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT): a systematic review by the Young Group of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (yAIRO). LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024; 129:133-151. [PMID: 37740838 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01708-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The advent of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) has recently changed the workflow of radiation treatments by ensuring highly collimated treatments. Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics are tools that have shown promising results for diagnosis, treatment optimization and outcome prediction. This review aims to assess the impact of AI and radiomics on modern IGRT modalities in RT. METHODS A PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase systematic review was conducted to investigate the impact of radiomics and AI to modern IGRT modalities. The search strategy was "Radiomics" AND "Cone Beam Computed Tomography"; "Radiomics" AND "Magnetic Resonance guided Radiotherapy"; "Radiomics" AND "on board Magnetic Resonance Radiotherapy"; "Artificial Intelligence" AND "Cone Beam Computed Tomography"; "Artificial Intelligence" AND "Magnetic Resonance guided Radiotherapy"; "Artificial Intelligence" AND "on board Magnetic Resonance Radiotherapy" and only original articles up to 01.11.2022 were considered. RESULTS A total of 402 studies were obtained using the previously mentioned search strategy on PubMed and Embase. The analysis was performed on a total of 84 papers obtained following the complete selection process. Radiomics application to IGRT was analyzed in 23 papers, while a total 61 papers were focused on the impact of AI on IGRT techniques. DISCUSSION AI and radiomics seem to significantly impact IGRT in all the phases of RT workflow, even if the evidence in the literature is based on retrospective data. Further studies are needed to confirm these tools' potential and provide a stronger correlation with clinical outcomes and gold-standard treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Boldrini
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario IRCCS "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea D'Aviero
- Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Sassari, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiological, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
- Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Carlo Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Valerio Nardone
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Piras
- UO Radioterapia Oncologica, Villa Santa Teresa, Bagheria, Palermo, Italy.
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Cyberknife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza (IFCA), 50139, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bernchou U, Schytte T, Bertelsen A, Lorenzen EL, Brink C, Mahmood F. Impact of abdominal compression on intra-fractional motion and delivered dose in magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiation ablation of adrenal gland metastases. Phys Med 2023; 114:102682. [PMID: 37717398 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The current study investigated the impact of abdominal compression on motion and the delivered dose during non-gated, magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided radiation ablation of adrenal gland metastases. METHODS Thirty-one patients with adrenal gland metastases treated to 45-60 Gy in 3-8 fractions on a 1.5 T MRI-linac were included in the study. The patients were breathing freely (n = 14) or with motion restricted by using an abdominal compression belt (n = 17). The time-resolved position of the target in online 2D cine MR images acquired during treatment was assessed and used to estimate the dose delivered to the GTV and abutting luminal organs at risk (OAR). RESULTS The median (range) 3D root-mean-square target position error was significantly higher in patients treated without a compression belt [2.9 (1.9-5.6) mm] compared to patients using the belt [2.1 (1.2-3.5) mm] (P < 0.01). The median (range) GTV V95% was significantly reduced from planned 98.6 (65.9-100) % to delivered 96.5 (64.5-99.9) % due to motion (P < 0.01). Most prominent dose reductions were found in patients showing either large target drift or respiration motion and were mainly treated without abdominal compression. Motion did not lead to an increased number of constraint violations for luminal OAR. CONCLUSIONS Acceptable target coverage and dose to OAR was observed in the vast majority of patients despite intra-fractional motion during adaptive MRI-guided radiation ablation. The use of abdominal compression significantly reduced the target position error and prevented the most prominent target coverage degradations and is, therefore, recommended as motion management at MRI-linacs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uffe Bernchou
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19 3., 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
| | - Tine Schytte
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19 3., 5000 Odense C, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
| | - Anders Bertelsen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
| | - Ebbe Laugaard Lorenzen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
| | - Carsten Brink
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19 3., 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
| | - Faisal Mahmood
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19 3., 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boldrini L, Romano A, Chiloiro G, Corradini S, De Luca V, Verusio V, D'Aviero A, Castelluccia A, Alitto AR, Catucci F, Grimaldi G, Trapp C, Hörner-Rieber J, Marchesano D, Frascino V, Mattiucci GC, Valentini V, Gentile P, Gambacorta MA. Magnetic resonance guided SBRT reirradiation in locally recurrent prostate cancer: a multicentric retrospective analysis. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:84. [PMID: 37218005 PMCID: PMC10201772 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02271-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Reirradiation of prostate cancer (PC) local recurrences represents an emerging challenge for current radiotherapy. In this context, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allows the delivery of high doses, with curative intent. Magnetic Resonance guided Radiation Therapy (MRgRT) has shown promising results in terms of safety, feasibility and efficacy of delivering SBRT thanks to the enhanced soft tissue contrast and the online adaptive workflow. This multicentric retrospective analysis evaluates the feasibility and efficacy of PC reirradiation, using a 0.35 T hybrid MR delivery unit. METHODS Patients affected by local recurrences of PC and treated in five institutions between 2019 and 2022 were retrospectively collected. All patients had undergone previous Radiation Therapy (RT) in definitive or adjuvant setting. Re-treatment MRgSBRT was delivered with a total dose ranging from 25 to 40 Gy in 5 fractions. Toxicity according to CTCAE v 5.0 and treatment response were assessed at the end of the treatment and at follow-up. RESULTS Eighteen patients were included in this analysis. All patients had previously undergone external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) up to a total dose of 59.36 to 80 Gy. Median cumulative biologically effective dose (BED) of SBRT re-treatment was 213,3 Gy (103,1-560), considering an α/β of 1.5. Complete response was achieved in 4 patients (22.2%). No grade ≥ 2 acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity events were recorded, while gastrointestinal (GI) acute toxicity events occurred in 4 patients (22.2%). CONCLUSION The low rates of acute toxicity of this experience encourages considering MRgSBRT a feasibile therapeutic approach for the treatment of clinically relapsed PC. Accurate gating of target volumes, the online adaptive planning workflow and the high definition of MRI treatment images allow delivering high doses to the PTV while efficiently sparing organs at risk (OARs).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Boldrini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Romano
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuditta Chiloiro
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Viola De Luca
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria Verusio
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Andrea D'Aviero
- Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Sassari, Italy
| | - Alessandra Castelluccia
- Radiation Oncology, Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiotherapy, Hospital "A. Perrino", ASL Brindisi, Brindisi, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Alitto
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Gianmarco Grimaldi
- Radiation Oncology, Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Domenico Marchesano
- Radiation Oncology, Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Frascino
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Sassari, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Piercarlo Gentile
- Radiation Oncology, Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|