Feasibility of ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy of pancreas cancer patients on a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance-linac system using abdominal compression

Proton Beam Therapy for Pancreatic Tumors: A Consensus Statement from the Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Gastrointestinal Subcommittee

Radiation therapy manages pancreatic cancer in various settings; however, the proximity of gastrointestinal (GI) luminal organs at risk (OARs) poses challenges to conventional radiation therapy. Proton beam therapy (PBT) may reduce toxicities compared to photon therapy. This consensus statement summarizes PBT's safe and optimal delivery for pancreatic tumors. Our group has specific expertise using PBT for GI indications and has developed expert recommendations for treating pancreatic tumors with PBT. Computed tomography (CT) simulation: Patients should be simulated supine (arms above head) with custom upper body immobilization. For stomach/duodenum filling consistency, patients should restrict oral intake within 3 hours before simulation/treatments. Fiducial markers may be implanted for image guidance; however, their design and composition require scrutiny. The reconstruction field-of-view should encompass all immobilization devices at the target level (CT slice thickness 2-3 mm). Four-dimensional CT should quantify respiratory motion and guide motion mitigation. Respiratory gating is recommended when motion affects OAR sparing or reduces target coverage. Treatment planning: Beam-angle selection factors include priority OAR-dose minimization, water-equivalent-thickness stability along the beam path, and enhanced relative biological effect consideration due to the increased linear energy transfer at the proton beam end-of-range. Posterior and right-lateral beam angles that avoid traversing GI luminal structures are preferred (minimizing dosimetric impacts of variable anatomies). Pencil beam scanning techniques should use robust optimization. Single-field optimization is preferable to increase robustness, but if OAR constraints cannot be met, multifield optimization may be used. Treatment delivery: Volumetric image guidance should be used daily. CT scans should be acquired ad hoc as necessary (at minimum every other week) to assess the dosimetric impacts of anatomy changes. Adaptive replanning should be performed as required. Our group has developed recommendations for delivering PBT to safely and effectively manage pancreatic tumors.

Intrafractional Motion in Online-Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiotherapy of Adrenal Metastases Leads to Reduced Target Volume Coverage and Elevated Organ-at-Risk Doses

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Stereotactic body radiotherapy is frequently used in patients with adrenal metastases. Motion of adherent radiosensitive organs at risk (OARs) and tumors influence OAR toxicity and tumor control. Online-adaptive Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) can address and mitigate interfractional changes. However, the impact of intrafractional variations in adrenal MRgRT is unknown.

METHODS

A total of 23 patients with 24 adrenal metastases were treated with MRgRT. After daily plan adaptation and before beam application, an additional (preRT) 3d MRI was acquired. PreRT target volumes and OARs were retrospectively recontoured in 200 fractions. The delivered, online-adapted treatment plans, as well as non-adapted baseline plans, were calculated on these re-contoured structures to quantify the dosimetric impact of intrafractional variations on target volume coverage and OAR doses with and without online adaptation. Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) were calculated.

RESULTS

The median time between the two MRIs was 56.4 min. GTV and PTV coverage (dose to 95% of the PTV, D95%, and volume covered by 100% of the prescription dose, V100%) were significantly inferior in the preRT plans. GTV Dmean was significantly impaired in left-sided metastases, but not in right-sided metastases. Compared to non-adapted preRT plans, adapted preRT plans were still significantly superior for all GTV and PTV metrics. Intrafractional violations of OAR constraints were frequent. D0.5cc and the volume exposed to the near-maximum dose constraint were significantly higher in the preRT plans. The volume exposed to the D0.5cc constraints in single fractions escalated up to 1.5 cc for the esophagus, 3.2 cc for the stomach, 5.3 cc for the duodenum and 7.3 cc for the bowel. This led to significantly elevated NTCPs for the stomach, bowel and duodenum. Neither PTV D95%, nor gastrointestinal OAR maximum doses were significantly impaired by longer fraction duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrafractional motion in adrenal MRgRT caused significant impairment of target volume coverage (D95% and V100%), potentially undermining local control. Frequent violation of gastrointestinal OAR constraints led to elevated NTCP. Compared to non-adaptive treatment, online adaptation still highly improved GTV and PTV coverage.

Risk analysis of the Unity 1.5T MR-Linac adapt-to-shape workflow

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The adapt-to-shape (ATS) workflow on the Unity MR-Linac (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) allows for full replanning including recontouring and reoptimization5. Additional complexity to this workflow is added when the adaptation involves the use of MIM Maestro (MIM Software, Cleveland, OH) software in conjunction with Monaco (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Given the interplay of various systems and the inherent complexity of the ATS workflow, a risk analysis would be instructive.

METHOD

Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) following Task Group 10013 was completed to evaluate the ATS workflow. A multi-disciplinary team was formed for this analysis. The team created a process map detailing the steps involved in ATS treating both the standard Monaco workflow and a workflow with the use of MIM software in parallel. From this, failure modes were identified, scored using three categories (likelihood of occurrence, severity, and detectability which multiplied create a risk priority number), and then mitigations for the top 20th percentile of failure modes were found.

RESULTS

Risk analysis found 264 failure modes in the ATS workflow. Of those, 82 were high-ranking failure modes that ranked in the top 20th percentile for risk priority number and severity scores. Although high-ranking failure modes were identified in each step in the process, 62 of them were found in the contouring and planning steps, highlighting key differences from adapt-to-position (ATP), where the importance of these steps are minimized. Mitigations are suggested for all high-ranking failure modes.

CONCLUSION

The flexibility of the ATS workflow, which enables reoptimization of the treatment plan, also introduces potential critical points where errors can occur. There are more opportunities for error in ATS that can create unintentionally negative dosimetric impact. FMEA can help mitigate these risks by identifying and addressing potential failure points in the ATS process.

Intrafraction motion and impact of margin reduction for MR-Linac online adaptive radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer treatments

INTRODUCTION

Online adaptive radiotherapy is well suited for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in pancreatic cancer due to considerable intrafractional tumour motion. This study aimed to assess intrafraction motion and generate adjusted planning target volume (PTV) margins required for online adaptive radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer treatment using abdominal compression on the magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-Linac).

METHODS

Motion monitoring images obtained from 67 fractions for 15 previously treated pancreatic cancer patients were analysed. All patients received SABR (50 Gy in five fractions) on the MR-Linac using abdominal compression. The analysis included quantification of intrafraction motion, leading to the development of adjusted PTV margins. The dosimetric impact of implementing the adjusted PTV was then evaluated in a cohort of 20 patients.

RESULTS

Intrafraction motion indicated an average target displacement of 1-3 mm, resulting in an adjusted PTV margin of 2 mm in the right-left and superior-inferior directions, and 3 mm in the anterior-posterior direction. Plans incorporating these adjusted margins consistently demonstrated improved dose to target volumes, with improvements averaging 1.5 Gy in CTV D99%, 4.9 Gy in PTV D99% and 1.2 Gy in PTV-high D90%, and better sparing of the organs at risk (OAR).

CONCLUSIONS

The improved target volume coverage and reduced OAR dose suggest potential for reducing current clinical margins for MR-Linac treatment. However, it is important to note that decreasing margins may reduce safeguards against geographical misses. Nonetheless, the continued integration of gating systems on MR-Linacs could provide confidence in adopting reduced margins.

A systematic review of the impact of abdominal compression and breath-hold techniques on motion, inter-fraction set-up errors, and intra-fraction errors in patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Reducing motion is vital when radiotherapy is used to treat patients with hepatobiliary (HPB) and pancreatic malignancies. Abdominal compression (AC) and breath-hold (BH) techniques aim to minimise respiratory motion, yet their adoption remains limited, and practices vary. This review examines the impact of AC and BH on motion, set-up errors, and patient tolerability in HPB and pancreatic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review, conducted using PRISMA and PICOS criteria, includes publications from January 2015 to February 2023. Eligible studies focused on AC and BH interventions in adults with HPB and pancreatic malignancies. Endpoints examined motion, set-up errors, intra-fraction errors, and patient tolerability. Due to study heterogeneity, Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis was used, and a 5 mm threshold assessed the impact of motion mitigation.

RESULTS

In forty studies, 14 explored AC and 26 BH, with 20 on HPB, 13 on pancreatic, and 7 on mixed cohorts. Six studied pre-treatment, 22 inter/intra-fraction errors, and 12 both. Six AC pre-treatment studies showed > 5 mm motion, and 4 BH and 2 AC studies reported > 5 mm inter-fraction errors. Compression studies commonly investigated the arch and belt, and DIBH was the predominant BH technique. No studies compared AC and BH. There was variation in the techniques, and several studies did not follow standardised error reporting. Patient experience and tolerability were under-reported.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that AC effectively reduces motion, but its effectiveness may vary between patients. BH can immobilise motion; however, it can be inconsistent between fractions. The review underscores the need for larger, standardised studies and emphasizes the importance of considering the patient's perspective for tailored treatments.

Enhancing Delivery Efficiency on the Magnetic Resonance-Linac: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

PURPOSE

Long treatment sessions are a limitation within magnetic resonance imaging guided adaptive radiation therapy (MRIgART). This work aims for significantly enhancing the delivery efficiency on the magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-linac) by introducing dedicated optimization and delivery techniques for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). VMAT plan and delivery quality during MRIgART is compared with step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten patients with prostate cancer previously treated on a 1.5T MR-linac were retrospectively replanned to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions using step-and-shoot IMRT and the clinical Hyperion optimizer within Monaco (Hyp-IMRT), the same optimizer with a VMAT technique (Hyp-VMAT), and a research-based optimizer called optimal fluence levels and pseudo gradient descent with VMAT (OFL+PGD-VMAT). The plans were then adapted onto each daily magnetic resonance imaging data set using 2 different optimization strategies to evaluate the adapt-to-position workflow: "optimize weights" (IMRT-Weights and VMAT-Weights) and "optimize shapes" (IMRT-Shapes and VMAT-Shapes). Treatment efficiency was evaluated by measuring optimization time, delivery time, and total time (optimization+delivery). Plan quality was assessed by evaluating organ at risk sparing. Ten patient plans were measured using a modified linac control system to assess delivery accuracy via a gamma analysis (2%/2 mm). Delivery efficiency was calculated as average dose rate divided by maximum dose rate.

RESULTS

For Hyp-VMAT and OFL+PGD-VMAT, the total time was reduced by 124 ± 140 seconds (P = .020) and 459 ± 110 seconds (P < .001), respectively, as compared with the clinical Hyp-IMRT group. Speed enhancements were also measured for adapt-to-position with reductions in total time of 404 ± 55 (P < .001) for VMAT-Weights as compared with the clinical IMRT-Shapes group. Bladder and rectum dosimetric volume histogram (DVH) points were within 1.3% or 0.8 cc for each group. All VMAT plans had gamma passing rates greater than 96%. The delivery efficiency of VMAT plans was 89.7 ± 2.7 % compared with 50.0 ± 2.2 % for clinical IMRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating VMAT into MRIgART will significantly reduce treatment session times while maintaining equivalent plan quality.

Quality and Safety Considerations for Adaptive Radiation Therapy: An ASTRO White Paper

PURPOSE

Adaptive radiation therapy (ART) is the latest topic in a series of white papers published by the American Society for Radiation Oncology addressing quality processes and patient safety. ART widens the therapeutic index by improving the precision of radiation dose to targets, allowing for dose escalation and/or minimization of dose to normal tissue. ART is performed via offline or online methods; offline ART is the process of replanning a patient's treatment plan between fractions, whereas online ART involves plan adjustment with the patient on the treatment table. This is achieved with in-room imaging capable of assessing anatomic changes and the ability to reoptimize the treatment plan rapidly during the treatment session. Although ART has occurred in its simplest forms in clinical practice for decades, recent technological developments have enabled more clinical applications of ART. With increased clinical prevalence, compressed timelines, and the associated complexity of ART, quality and safety considerations are an important focus area.

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened an interdisciplinary task force to provide expert consensus on key workflows and processes for ART. Recommendations were created using a consensus-building methodology, and task force members indicated their level of agreement based on a 5-point Likert scale, from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." A prespecified threshold of ≥75% of raters selecting "strongly agree" or "agree" indicated consensus. Content not meeting this threshold was removed or revised.

SUMMARY

Establishing and maintaining an adaptive program requires a team-based approach, appropriately trained and credentialed specialists, significant resources, specialized technology, and implementation time. A comprehensive quality assurance program must be developed, using established guidance, to make sure all forms of ART are performed in a safe and effective manner. Patient safety when delivering ART is everyone's responsibility, and professional organizations, regulators, vendors, and end users must demonstrate a clear commitment to working together to deliver the highest levels of quality and safety.

Feasibility of quantitative relaxometry for prostate target localization and response assessment in magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy

Purpose

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is known to provide predictors for malignancy and treatment outcome. The inclusion of these datasets in workflows for online adaptive planning remains under investigation. We demonstrate the feasibility of longitudinal relaxometry in online MR-guided adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to the prostate and dominant intra-prostatic lesion (DIL).

Methods

Fifty patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were included in the study. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the prostate gland plus 1 cm of seminal vesicles. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined as the DIL identified on multiparametric MRI. Online adaptive radiotherapy was delivered in a 1.5 T MR-Linac using a prescription of 800 cGy/900 cGy × 5 fractions to the CTV + 3 mm/GTV + 2 mm. Relaxometry and diffusion-weighted imaging were implemented using clinically available sequences. Test-retest measurements were performed in eight patients, at each treatment fraction. Bias and uncertainty in relaxometry measurements were also assessed using a reference phantom.

Results

The bias in longitudinal/transverse relaxation times was negligible while uncertainty was within 3 %. Test-retest measurements demonstrate that bias/uncertainty in patient T1 and T2 were comparable to bias/uncertainty estimated in the phantom. Mean T1 and T2 relaxation were significantly different between the prostate and DIL. The correlation between T1, T2, and diffusion was significant in the DIL, but not in the prostate. During treatment, mean T1 in the DIL approaches mean T1 in the prostate.

Conclusions

Longitudinal relaxometry for online MR-guided adaptive SBRT is feasible in a high-field MR-Linac and may provide complementary information for target delineation and response assessment.

MR signature matching (MRSIGMA) implementation for true real-time free-breathing volumetric imaging with sub-200 ms latency on an MR-Linac

PURPOSE

Develop a true real-time implementation of MR signature matching (MRSIGMA) for free-breathing 3D MRI with sub-200 ms latency on the Elekta Unity 1.5T MR-Linac.

METHODS

MRSIGMA was implemented on an external computer with a network connection to the MR-Linac. Stack-of-stars with partial kz sampling was used to accelerate data acquisition and ReconSocket was employed for simultaneous data transmission. Movienet network computed the 4D MRI motion dictionary and correlation analysis was used for signature matching. A programmable 4D MRI phantom was utilized to evaluate MRSIGMA with respect to a ground-truth translational motion reference. In vivo validation was performed on patients with pancreatic cancer, where 15 patients were employed to train Movienet and 7 patients to test the real-time implementation of MRSIGMA. Dice coefficients between real-time MRSIGMA and a retrospectively computed 4D reference were used to evaluate motion tracking performance.

RESULTS

Motion dictionary was computed in under 5 s. Signature acquisition and matching presented 173 ms latency on the phantom and 193 ms on patients. MRSIGMA presented a mean error of 1.3-1.6 mm for all phantom experiments, which was below the 2 mm acquisition resolution along the motion direction. The Dice coefficient over time between MRSIGMA and reference contours was 0.88 ± 0.02 (GTV), 0.87 ± 0.02(duodenum-stomach), and 0.78 ± 0.02(small bowel), demonstrating high motion tracking performance for both tumor and organs at risk.

CONCLUSION

The real-time implementation of MRSIGMA enabled true real-time free-breathing 3D MRI with sub-200 ms imaging latency on a clinical MR-Linac system, which can be used for treatment monitoring, adaptive radiotherapy and dose accumulation mapping in tumors affected by respiratory motion.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for the primary tumor and oligometastases versus the primary tumor alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Local therapies may benefit patients with oligometastatic cancer. However, there were limited data about pancreatic cancer. Here, we compared the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the primary tumor and all oligometastases with SBRT to the primary tumor alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with synchronous oligometastatic pancreatic cancer (up to 5 lesions) receiving SBRT to all lesions (including all oligometastases and the primary tumor) were performed. Another comparable group of patients with similar baseline characteristics, including metastatic burden, SBRT doses, and chemotherapy regimens, receiving SBRT to the primary tumor alone were identified. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression frees survival (PFS), polyprogression free survival (PPFS) and adverse events.

RESULTS

There were 59 and 158 patients receiving SBRT to all lesions and to the primary tumor alone. The median OS of patients with SBRT to all lesions and the primary tumor alone was 10.9 months (95% CI 10.2-11.6 months) and 9.3 months (95% CI 8.8-9.8 months) (P < 0.001). The median PFS of two groups was 6.5 months (95% CI 5.6-7.4 months) and 4.1 months (95% CI 3.8-4.4 months) (P < 0.001). The median PPFS of two groups was 9.8 months (95% CI 8.9-10.7 months) and 7.8 months (95% CI 7.2-8.4 months) (P < 0.001). Additionally, 14 (23.7%) and 32 (20.2%) patients in two groups had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT to all oligometastases and the primary tumor in patients with pancreatic cancer may improve survival, which needs prospective verification.

Optimization of treatment workflow for 0.35T MR-Linac system

PURPOSE

This study presents a novel and comprehensive framework for evaluating magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) workflow by integrating the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) approach with Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC). We assess the workflow for safety, quality, and economic implications, providing a holistic understanding of the MRgRT implementation. The aim is to offer valuable insights to healthcare practitioners and administrators, facilitating informed decision-making regarding the 0.35T MRIdian MR-Linac system's clinical workflow.

METHODS

For FMEA, a multidisciplinary team followed the TG-100 methodology to assess the MRgRT workflow's potential failure modes. Following the mitigation of primary failure modes and workflow optimization, a treatment process was established for TDABC analysis. The TDABC was applied to both MRgRT and computed tomography guided RT (CTgRT) for typical five-fraction stereotactic body RT (SBRT) treatments, assessing total workflow and costs associated between the two treatment workflows.

RESULTS

A total of 279 failure modes were identified, with 31 categorized as high-risk, 55 as medium-risk, and the rest as low-risk. The top 20% risk priority numbers (RPN) were determined for each radiation oncology care team member. Total MRgRT and CTgRT costs were assessed. Implementing technological advancements, such as real-time multi leaf collimator (MLC) tracking with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), auto-segmentation, and increasing the Linac dose rate, led to significant cost savings for MRgRT.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we integrated FMEA with TDABC to comprehensively evaluate the workflow and the associated costs of MRgRT compared to conventional CTgRT for five-fraction SBRT treatments. FMEA analysis identified critical failure modes, offering insights to enhance patient safety. TDABC analysis revealed that while MRgRT provides unique advantages, it may involve higher costs. Our findings underscore the importance of exploring cost-effective strategies and key technological advancements to ensure the widespread adoption and financial sustainability of MRgRT in clinical practice.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Introduction

For patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), who are candidates for radiation therapy, dose-escalated radiation therapy (RT) offers unique benefits over traditional radiation techniques. In this review, we present a historical perspective of dose-escalated RT for LAPC. We also outline advances in SBRT delivery, one form of dose escalation and a framework for selecting patients for treatment with SBRT.

Results

Techniques for delivering SBRT to patients with LAPC have evolved considerably, now allowing for dose-escalation and superior respiratory motion management. At the same time, advancements in systemic therapy, particularly the use of induction multiagent chemotherapy, have called into question which patients would benefit most from radiation therapy. Multidisciplinary assessment of patients with LAPC is critical to guide management and select patients for local therapy. Results from ongoing trials will establish if there is a role of dose-escalated SBRT after induction chemotherapy for carefully selected patients.

Conclusion

Patients with LAPC have more therapeutic options than ever before. Careful selection for SBRT may enhance patient outcomes, pending the maturation of pivotal clinical trials.

Treatment planning for MR-guided SBRT of pancreatic tumors on a 1.5 T MR-Linac: A global consensus protocol

Background and purpose

Treatment planning for MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pancreatic tumors can be challenging, leading to a wide variation of protocols and practices. This study aimed to harmonize treatment planning by developing a consensus planning protocol for MR-guided pancreas SBRT on a 1.5 T MR-Linac.

Materials and methods

A consortium was founded of thirteen centers that treat pancreatic tumors on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. A phased planning exercise was conducted in which centers iteratively created treatment plans for two cases of pancreatic cancer. Each phase was followed by a meeting where the instructions for the next phase were determined. After three phases, a consensus protocol was reached.

Results

In the benchmarking phase (phase I), substantial variation between the SBRT protocols became apparent (for example, the gross tumor volume (GTV) D99% ranged between 36.8 - 53.7 Gy for case 1, 22.6 - 35.5 Gy for case 2). The next phase involved planning according to the same basic dosimetric objectives, constraints, and planning margins (phase II), which led to a large degree of harmonization (GTV D99% range: 47.9-53.6 Gy for case 1, 33.9-36.6 Gy for case 2). In phase III, the final consensus protocol was formulated in a treatment planning system template and again used for treatment planning. This not only resulted in further dosimetric harmonization (GTV D99% range: 48.2-50.9 Gy for case 1, 33.5-36.0 Gy for case 2) but also in less variation of estimated treatment delivery times.

Conclusion

A global consensus protocol has been developed for treatment planning for MR-guided pancreatic SBRT on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. Aside from harmonizing the large variation in the current clinical practice, this protocol can provide a starting point for centers that are planning to treat pancreatic tumors on MR-Linac systems.

Intrafraction organ movement in adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy of abdominal lesions - dosimetric impact and how to detect its extent in advance

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) allows daily adaptation of treatment plans to compensate for positional changes of target volumes and organs at risk (OARs). However, current adaptation times are relatively long and organ movement occurring during the adaptation process might offset the benefit gained by adaptation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric impact of these intrafractional changes. Additionally, a method to predict the extent of organ movement before the first treatment was evaluated in order to have the possibility to compensate for them, for example by adding additional margins to OARs.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Twenty patients receiving adaptive MRgRT for treatment of abdominal lesions were retrospectively analyzed. Magnetic resonance (MR) images acquired at the start of adaptation and immediately before irradiation were used to calculate adapted and pre-irradiation dose in OARs directly next to the planning target volume. The extent of organ movement was determined on MR images acquired during simulation sessions and adaptive treatments, and their agreement was evaluated. Correlation between the magnitude of organ movement during simulation and the duration of simulation session was analyzed in order to assess whether organ movement might be relevant even if the adaptation process could be accelerated in the future.

RESULTS

A significant increase in dose constraint violations was observed from adapted (6.9%) to pre-irradiation (30.2%) dose distributions. Overall, OAR dose increased significantly by 4.3% due to intrafractional organ movement. Median changes in organ position of 7.5 mm (range 1.5-10.5 mm) were detected within a median time of 17.1 min (range 1.6-28.7 min). Good agreement was found between the range of organ movement during simulation and adaptation (66.8%), especially if simulation sessions were longer and multiple MR images were acquired. No correlation was determined between duration of simulation sessions and magnitude of organ movement.

CONCLUSION

Intrafractional organ movement can impact dose distributions and lead to violations of OAR tolerance doses, which impairs the benefit of daily on-table plan adaptation. By application of simulation images, the extent of intrafractional organ movement can be predicted, which possibly allows to compensate for them.

Clinical Outcomes of Online Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Adrenal Metastases from a Single Institution

(1) Background: Recent publications foster stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with adrenal oligometastases or oligoprogression. However, local control (LC) after non-adaptive SBRT shows the potential for improvement. Online adaptive MR-guided SBRT (MRgSBRT) improves tumor coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. Long-term results of adaptive MRgSBRT are still sparse. (2) Methods: Adaptive MRgSBRT was performed on a 0.35 T MR-Linac. LC, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity were assessed. (3) Results: 35 patients with 40 adrenal metastases were analyzed. The median gross tumor volume was 30.6 cc. The most common regimen was 10 fractions at 5 Gy. The median biologically effective dose (BED10) was 75.0 Gy. Plan adaptation was performed in 98% of all fractions. The median follow-up was 7.9 months. One local failure occurred after 16.6 months, resulting in estimated LC rates of 100% at one year and 90% at two years. ORR was 67.5%. The median OS was 22.4 months, and the median PFS was 5.1 months. No toxicity > CTCAE grade 2 occurred. (4) Conclusions: LC and ORR after adrenal adaptive MRgSBRT were excellent, even in a cohort with comparably large metastases. A BED10 of 75 Gy seems sufficient for improved LC in comparison to non-adaptive SBRT.

A pilot study on interobserver variability in organ-at-risk contours in magnetic resonance imaging-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer

Purpose

Differences in the contours created during magnetic resonance imaging-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgOART) affect dose distribution. This study evaluated the interobserver error in delineating the organs at risk (OARs) in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with MRgOART. Moreover, we explored the effectiveness of drugs that could suppress peristalsis in restraining intra-fractional motion by evaluating OAR visualization in multiple patients.

Methods

This study enrolled three patients who underwent MRgOART for pancreatic cancer. The study cohort was classified into three conditions based on the MRI sequence and butylscopolamine administration (Buscopan): 1, T2 imaging without butylscopolamine administration; 2, T2 imaging with butylscopolamine administration; and 3, multi-contrast imaging with butylscopolamine administration. Four blinded observers visualized the OARs (stomach, duodenum, small intestine, and large intestine) on MR images acquired during the initial and final MRgOART sessions. The contour was delineated on a slice area of ±2 cm surrounding the planning target volume. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to evaluate the contour. Moreover, the OARs were visualized on both MR images acquired before and after the contour delineation process during MRgOART to evaluate whether peristalsis could be suppressed. The DSC was calculated for each OAR.

Results

Interobserver errors in the OARs (stomach, duodenum, small intestine, large intestine) for the three conditions were 0.636, 0.418, 0.676, and 0.806; 0.725, 0.635, 0.762, and 0.821; and 0.841, 0.677, 0.762, and 0.807, respectively. The DSC was higher in all conditions with butylscopolamine administration compared with those without it, except for the stomach in condition 2, as observed in the last session of MR image. The DSCs for OARs (stomach, duodenum, small intestine, large intestine) extracted before and after contouring were 0.86, 0.78, 0.88, and 0.87; 0.97, 0.94, 0.90, and 0.94; and 0.94, 0.86, 0.89, and 0.91 for conditions 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

Conclusion

Butylscopolamine effectively reduced interobserver error and intra-fractional motion during the MRgOART treatment.

Feasibility and safety of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy for upper abdominal tumors: A preliminary exploration

This study investigates the use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) in MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) for upper abdominal tumors. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR (cT1w MR) using half doses of gadoterate was used to guide daily adaptive radiotherapy for tumors poorly visualized without contrast. The use of gadoterate was found to be feasible and safe in 5-fraction MRgART and could improve the contrast-to-noise ratio of MR images. And the use of cT1w MR could reduce the interobserver variation of adaptive tumor delineation compared to plain T1w MR (4.41 vs. 6.58, p < 0.001) and T2w MR (4.41 vs. 7.42, p < 0.001).

Evaluation of clinical parallel workflow in online adaptive MR-guided Radiotherapy: A detailed assessment of treatment session times

Introduction

Advancements in MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) enable clinical parallel workflows (CPW) for online adaptive planning (oART), allowing medical physicists (MPs), physicians (MDs), and radiation therapists (RTTs) to perform their tasks simultaneously. This study evaluates the impact of this upgrade on the total treatment time by analyzing each step of the current 0.35T-MRgRT workflow.

Methods

The time process of the workflow steps for 254 treatment fractions in 0.35 MRgRT was examined. Patients have been grouped based on disease site, breathing modality (BM) (BHI or FB), and fractionation (stereotactic body RT [SBRT] or standard fractionated long course [LC]). The time spent for the following workflow steps in Adaptive Treatment (ADP) was analyzed: Patient Setup Time (PSt), MRI Acquisition and Matching (MRt), MR Re-contouring Time (RCt), Re-Planning Time (RPt), Treatment Delivery Time (TDt). Also analyzed was the timing of treatments that followed a Simple workflow (SMP), without the online re-planning (PSt + MRt + TDt.).

Results

The time analysis revealed that the ADP workflow (median: 34 min) is significantly (p < 0.05) longer than the SMP workflow (19 min). The time required for ADP treatments is significantly influenced by TDt, constituting 40 % of the total time. The oART steps (RCt + RPt) took 11 min (median), representing 27 % of the entire procedure. Overall, 79.2 % of oART fractions were completed in less than 45 min, and 30.6 % were completed in less than 30 min.

Conclusion

This preliminary analysis, along with the comparative assessment against existing literature, underscores the potential of CPW to diminish the overall treatment duration in MRgRT-oART. Additionally, it suggests the potential for CPW to promote a more integrated multidisciplinary approach in the execution of oART.

The Use of MR-Guided Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer

The introduction of online adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiation therapy (RT) has enabled safe treatment of pancreatic cancer with ablative doses. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current literature on the use and clinical outcomes of MR-guided RT for treatment of pancreatic cancer. Relevant outcomes included toxicity, tumor response, survival and quality of life. The results of these studies support further investigation of the effectiveness of ablative MR-guided SBRT as a low-toxic, minimally-invasive therapy for localized pancreatic cancer in prospective clinical trials.

Dosimetric comparison of stereotactic MR-guided radiation therapy (SMART) and HDR brachytherapy boost in cervical cancer

PURPOSE

The standard of care in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). Although previous studies compared HDR-BT with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), there is scarce data regarding the dosimetric outcomes of stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) boost in lieu of HDR-BT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this single-institutional in-silico comparative study, LACC patients who were definitively treated with external beam radiotherapy followed by HDR-BT were selected. Target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated in MRI and HDR-planning CT. An HDR-BT and a SMART boost plan were generated with a prescribed dose of 28 Gy in four fractions for all patients. The HDR-BT and SMART boost plans were compared in regard to target coverage as well OARs doses.

RESULTS

Mean EQD2 D90 to HR-CTV and IR-CTV for HDR-BT plans were 89.7 and 70.5 Gy, respectively. For SMART, the mean EQD2 D90 to HR-PTV, HR-CTV, and IR-CTV were 82.9, 95.4, and 70.2 Gy, respectively. The mean D2cc EQD2 of bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon for HDR-BT plans were 86.4, 70.7, and 65.7 Gy, respectively. The mean D2cc EQD2 of bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon for SMART plans were 81.4, 70.8, and 73.6 Gy, respectively. All dose constraints in terms of target coverage and OARs constraints were met for both HDR-BT and SMART plans.

CONCLUSIONS

This dosimetric study demonstrates that SMART can be applied in cases where HDR-BT is not available or ineligible with acceptable target coverage and OAR sparing. However, prospective clinical studies are needed to validate these results.

Intrafraction Motion Management With MR-Guided Radiation Therapy

High quality radiation therapy requires highly accurate and precise dose delivery. MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT), integrating an MRI scanner with a linear accelerator, offers excellent quality images in the treatment room without subjecting patient to ionizing radiation. MRgRT therefore provides a powerful tool for intrafraction motion management. This paper summarizes different sources of intrafraction motion for different disease sites and describes the MR imaging techniques available to visualize and quantify intrafraction motion. It provides an overview of MR guided motion management strategies and of the current technical capabilities of the commercially available MRgRT systems. It describes how these motion management capabilities are currently being used in clinical studies, protocols and provides a future outlook.

Impact of intrafraction motion in pancreatic cancer treatments with MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy

Purpose

The total time of radiation treatment delivery for pancreatic cancer patients with daily online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) on an MR-Linac can range from 50 to 90 min. During this period, the target and normal tissues undergo changes due to respiration and physiologic organ motion. We evaluated the dosimetric impact of the intrafraction physiological organ changes.

Methods

Ten locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients were treated with 50 Gy in five fractions with intensity-modulated respiratory-gated radiation therapy on a 0.35-T MR-Linac. Patients received both pre- and post-treatment volumetric MRIs for each fraction. Gastrointestinal organs at risk (GI-OARs) were delineated on the pre-treatment MRI during the online ART process and retrospectively on the post-treatment MRI. The treated dose distribution for each adaptive plan was assessed on the post-treatment anatomy. Prescribed dose volume histogram metrics for the scheduled plan on the pre-treatment anatomy, the adapted plan on the pre-treatment anatomy, and the adapted plan on post-treatment anatomy were compared to the OAR-defined criteria for adaptation: the volume of the GI-OAR receiving greater than 33 Gy (V33Gy) should be ≤1 cubic centimeter.

Results

Across the 50 adapted plans for the 10 patients studied, 70% were adapted to meet the duodenum constraint, 74% for the stomach, 12% for the colon, and 48% for the small bowel. Owing to intrafraction organ motion, at the time of post-treatment imaging, the adaptive criteria were exceeded for the duodenum in 62% of fractions, the stomach in 36%, the colon in 10%, and the small bowel in 48%. Compared to the scheduled plan, the post-treatment plans showed a decrease in the V33Gy, demonstrating the benefit of plan adaptation for 66% of the fractions for the duodenum, 95% for the stomach, 100% for the colon, and 79% for the small bowel.

Conclusion

Post-treatment images demonstrated that over the course of the adaptive plan generation and delivery, the GI-OARs moved from their isotoxic low-dose region and nearer to the dose-escalated high-dose region, exceeding dose-volume constraints. Intrafraction motion can have a significant dosimetric impact; therefore, measures to mitigate this motion are needed. Despite consistent intrafraction motion, plan adaptation still provides a dosimetric benefit.

Assessment of interfraction dose variation in pancreas SBRT using daily simulation MR images

Pancreatic Cancer is associated with poor treatment outcomes compared to other cancers. High local control rates have been achieved by using hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to treat pancreatic cancer. Challenges in delivering SBRT include close proximity of several organs at risk (OARs) and target volume inter and intra fraction positional variations. Magnetic resonance image (MRI) guided radiotherapy has shown potential for online adaptive radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer, with superior soft tissue contrast compared to CT. The aim of this study was to investigate the variability of target and OAR volumes for different treatment approaches for pancreatic cancer, and to assess the suitability of utilizing a treatment-day MRI for treatment planning purposes. Ten healthy volunteers were scanned on a Siemens Skyra 3 T MRI scanner over two sessions (approximately 3 h apart), per day over 5 days to simulate an SBRT daily simulation scan for treatment planning. A pretreatment scan was also done to simulate patient setup and treatment. A 4D MRI scan was taken at each session for internal target volume (ITV) generation and assessment. For each volunteer a treatment plan was generated in the Raystation treatment planning system (TPS) following departmental protocols on the day one, first session dataset (D1S1), with bulk density overrides applied to enable dose calculation. This treatment plan was propagated through other imaging sessions, and the dose calculated. An additional treatment plan was generated on each first session of each day (S1) to simulate a daily replan process, with this plan propagated to the second session of the day. These accumulated mock treatment doses were assessed against the original treatment plan through DVH comparison of the PTV and OAR volumes. The generated ITV showed large variations when compared to both the first session ITV and daily ITV, with an average magnitude of 22.44% ± 13.28% and 25.83% ± 37.48% respectively. The PTV D95 was reduced by approximately 23.3% for both plan comparisons considered. Surrounding OARs had large variations in dose, with the small bowel V30 increasing by 128.87% when compared to the D1S1 plan, and 43.11% when compared to each daily S1 plan. Daily online adaptive radiotherapy is required for accurate dose delivery for pancreas cancer in the absence of additional motion management and tumour tracking techniques.

Online Adaptive MRI-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Pancreatic and Other Intra-Abdominal Cancers

A 1.5T MRI combined with a linear accelerator (Unity®, Elekta; Stockholm, Sweden) is a device that shows promise in MRI-guided stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT). Previous studies utilized the manufacturer's pre-set MRI sequences (i.e., T2 Weighted (T2W)), which limited the visualization of pancreatic and intra-abdominal tumors and organs at risk (OAR). Here, a T1 Weighted (T1W) sequence was utilized to improve the visualization of tumors and OAR for online adapted-to-position (ATP) and adapted-to-shape (ATS) during MRI-guided SBRT. Twenty-six patients, 19 with pancreatic and 7 with intra-abdominal cancers, underwent CT and MRI simulations for SBRT planning before being treated with multi-fractionated MRI-guided SBRT. The boundary of tumors and OAR was more clearly seen on T1W image sets, resulting in fast and accurate contouring during online ATP/ATS planning. Plan quality in 26 patients was dependent on OAR proximity to the target tumor and achieved 96 ± 5% and 92 ± 9% in gross tumor volume D90% and planning target volume D90%. We utilized T1W imaging (about 120 s) to shorten imaging time by 67% compared to T2W imaging (about 360 s) and improve tumor visualization, minimizing target/OAR delineation uncertainty and the treatment margin for sparing OAR. The average time-consumption of MRI-guided SBRT for the first 21 patients was 55 ± 15 min for ATP and 79 ± 20 min for ATS.

Predicting the daily gastrointestinal doses of stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer based on the shortest distance between the tumor and the gastrointestinal tract using daily computed tomography images

Objectives

We aimed to investigate whether daily computed tomography (CT) images could predict the daily gastroduodenal, small intestine, and large intestine doses of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pancreatic cancer based on the shortest distance between the gross tumor volume (GTV) and gastrointestinal (GI) tract.

Methods

Twelve patients with pancreatic cancer received SBRT of 40 Gy in five fractions. We recalculated the reference clinical SBRT plan (PLANref) using daily CT images and calculated the shortest distance from the GTV to each GI tract. The maximum dose delivered to 0.5 cc (D0.5cc) was evaluated for each planning at-risk volume of the GI tract. Spearman's correlation test was used to determine the association between the daily change in the shortest distance (Δshortest distance) and the ratio of ΔD0.5cc dose to D0.5cc dose in PLANref (ΔD0.5cc/PLANref) for quantitative analysis.

Results

The median shortest distance in PLANref was 0 mm in the gastroduodenum (interquartile range, 0-2.7), 16.7 mm in the small intestine (10.0-23.7), and 16.7 mm in the large intestine (8.3-28.1 mm). The D0.5cc of PLANref in the gastroduodenum was >30 Gy in all patients, with 10 (83.3%) having the highest dose. A significant association was found between the Δshortest distance and ΔD0.5cc/ PLANref in the small or large intestine (p < 0.001) but not in the gastroduodenum (p = 0.404).

Conclusions

The gastroduodenum had a higher D0.5cc and predicting the daily dose was difficult. Daily dose calculations of the GI tract are recommended for safe SBRT.

Advances in knowledge

This study aimed to predict the daily doses in SBRT for pancreatic cancer from the shortest distance between the GTV and the gastrointestinal tract.Daily changes in the shortest distance can predict the daily dose to the small or large intestines, but not to the gastroduodenum.

Real-time 4D MRI using MR signature matching (MRSIGMA) on a 1.5T MR-Linac system

Objective. To develop real-time 4D MRI using MR signature matching (MRSIGMA) for volumetric motion imaging in patients with pancreatic cancer on a 1.5T MR-Linac system.Approach. Two consecutive MRI scans with 3D golden-angle radial stack-of-stars acquisitions were performed on ten patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer. The complete first scan (905 angles) was used to compute a 4D motion dictionary including ten pairs of 3D motion images and signatures. The second scan was used for real-time imaging, where each angle (275 ms) was processed separately to match it to one of the dictionary entries. The complete second scan was also used to compute a 4D reference to assess motion tracking performance.Dicecoefficients of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and two organs-at-risk (duodenum-stomach and small bowel) were calculated between signature matching and reference. In addition, volume changes, displacements, center of mass shifts, andDicescores over time were calculated to characterize motion.Main results. Total imaging latency of MRSIGMA (acquisition + matching) was less than 300 ms. TheDicecoefficients were 0.87 ± 0.06 (GTV), 0.86 ± 0.05 (duodenum-stomach), and 0.85 ± 0.05 (small bowel), which indicate high accuracy (high mean value) and low uncertainty (low standard deviation) of MRSIGMA for real-time motion tracking. The center of mass shift was 3.1 ± 2.0 mm (GTV), 5.3 ± 3.0 mm (duodenum-stomach), and 3.4 ± 1.5 mm (small bowel). TheDicescores over time (0.97 ± [0.01-0.03]) were similarly high for MRSIGMA and reference scans in all the three contours.Significance. This work demonstrates the feasibility of real-time 4D MRI using MRSIGMA for volumetric motion tracking on a 1.5T MR-Linac system. The high accuracy and low uncertainty of real-time MRSIGMA is an essential step towards continuous treatment adaptation of tumors affected by real-time respiratory motion and could ultimately improve treatment safety by optimizing ablative dose delivery near gastrointestinal organs.

Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study of SBRT Using 3 Fractions for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

The optimal dose and fractionation of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) have not been defined. Single-fraction SBRT was associated with more gastrointestinal toxicity, so 5-fraction regimens have become more commonly employed. We aimed to determine the safety and maximally tolerated dose of 3-fraction SBRT for LAPC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two parallel phase 1 dose escalation trials were conducted from 2016 to 2019 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and University of Colorado. Patients with histologically confirmed LAPC without distant progression after at least 2 months of induction chemotherapy were eligible. Patients received 3-fraction linear accelerator-based SBRT at 3 dose levels, 27, 30, and 33 Gy, following a modified 3+3 design. Dose-limiting toxicity, defined as grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity within 90 days, was scored by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4. The secondary endpoints included cumulative incidence of local failure (LF) and distant metastasis (DM), as well as progression-free and overall survival PFS and OS, respectively, toxicity, and quality of life (QoL) using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the pancreatic cancer-specific QLQ-PAN26 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Twenty-four consecutive patients were enrolled (27 Gy: 9, 30 Gy: 8, 33 Gy: 7). The median (range) age was 67 (52-79) years, and 12 (50%) had a head/uncinate tumor location, with a median tumor size of 3.8 (1.1-11) cm and CA19-9 of 60 (1-4880) U/mL. All received chemotherapy for a median of 4 (1.4-10) months. There were no grade ≥3 toxicities. Two-year rates (95% confidence interval) of LF, DM, PFS, and OS were 31.7% (8.6%-54.8%), 70.2% (49.7%-90.8%), 20.8% (4.6%-37.1%), and 29.2% (11.0%-47.4%), respectively. Three- and 6-month QoL assessment showed no detriment.

CONCLUSIONS

For select patients with LAPC, dose escalation to 33 Gy in 3 fractions resulted in no dose-limiting toxicities, no detriments to QoL, and disease outcomes comparable with conventional RT. Further exploration of SBRT schemes to maximize tumor control while enabling efficient integration with systemic therapy is warranted.

Progressively refined deep joint registration segmentation (ProRSeg) of gastrointestinal organs at risk: Application to MRI and cone-beam CT

BACKGROUND

Adaptive radiation treatment (ART) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) requires consistently accurate segmentation of the extremely mobile gastrointestinal (GI) organs at risk (OAR) including the stomach, duodenum, large and small bowel. Also, due to lack of sufficiently accurate and fast deformable image registration (DIR), accumulated dose to the GI OARs is currently only approximated, further limiting the ability to more precisely adapt treatments.

PURPOSE

Develop a 3-D Progressively refined joint Registration-Segmentation (ProRSeg) deep network to deformably align and segment treatment fraction magnetic resonance images (MRI)s, then evaluate segmentation accuracy, registration consistency, and feasibility for OAR dose accumulation.

METHOD

ProRSeg was trained using five-fold cross-validation with 110 T2-weighted MRI acquired at five treatment fractions from 10 different patients, taking care that same patient scans were not placed in training and testing folds. Segmentation accuracy was measured using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance at 95th percentile (HD95). Registration consistency was measured using coefficient of variation (CV) in displacement of OARs. Statistical comparison to other deep learning and iterative registration methods were done using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by pair-wise comparisons with Bonferroni correction applied for multiple testing. Ablation tests and accuracy comparisons against multiple methods were done. Finally, applicability of ProRSeg to segment cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans was evaluated on a publicly available dataset of 80 scans using five-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS

ProRSeg processed 3D volumes (128 × 192 × 128) in 3 s on a NVIDIA Tesla V100 GPU. It's segmentations were significantly more accurate (p < 0.001 $p<0.001$ ) than compared methods, achieving a DSC of 0.94 ±0.02 for liver, 0.88±0.04 for large bowel, 0.78±0.03 for small bowel and 0.82±0.04 for stomach-duodenum from MRI. ProRSeg achieved a DSC of 0.72±0.01 for small bowel and 0.76±0.03 for stomach-duodenum from public CBCT dataset. ProRSeg registrations resulted in the lowest CV in displacement (stomach-duodenumC V x $CV_{x}$ : 0.75%,C V y $CV_{y}$ : 0.73%, andC V z $CV_{z}$ : 0.81%; small bowelC V x $CV_{x}$ : 0.80%,C V y $CV_{y}$ : 0.80%, andC V z $CV_{z}$ : 0.68%; large bowelC V x $CV_{x}$ : 0.71%,C V y $CV_{y}$ : 0.81%, andC V z $CV_{z}$ : 0.75%). ProRSeg based dose accumulation accounting for intra-fraction (pre-treatment to post-treatment MRI scan) and inter-fraction motion showed that the organ dose constraints were violated in four patients for stomach-duodenum and for three patients for small bowel. Study limitations include lack of independent testing and ground truth phantom datasets to measure dose accumulation accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

ProRSeg produced more accurate and consistent GI OARs segmentation and DIR of MRI and CBCTs compared to multiple methods. Preliminary results indicates feasibility for OAR dose accumulation using ProRSeg.

A model for gastrointestinal tract motility in a 4D imaging phantom of human anatomy

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal (GI) tract motility is one of the main sources for intra/inter-fraction variability and uncertainty in radiation therapy for abdominal targets. Models for GI motility can improve the assessment of delivered dose and contribute to the development, testing, and validation of deformable image registration (DIR) and dose-accumulation algorithms.

PURPOSE

To implement GI tract motion in the 4D extended cardiac-torso (XCAT) digital phantom of human anatomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Motility modes that exhibit large amplitude changes in the diameter of the GI tract and may persist over timescales comparable to online adaptive planning and radiotherapy delivery were identified based on literature research. Search criteria included amplitude changes larger than planning risk volume expansions and durations of the order of tens of minutes. The following modes were identified: peristalsis, rhythmic segmentation, high amplitude propagating contractions (HAPCs), and tonic contractions. Peristalsis and rhythmic segmentations were modeled by traveling and standing sinusoidal waves. HAPCs and tonic contractions were modeled by traveling and stationary Gaussian waves. Wave dispersion in the temporal and spatial domain was implemented by linear, exponential, and inverse power law functions. Modeling functions were applied to the control points of the nonuniform rational B-spline surfaces defined in the reference XCAT library. GI motility was combined with the cardiac and respiratory motions available in the standard 4D-XCAT phantom. Default model parameters were estimated based on the analysis of cine MRI acquisitions in 10 patients treated in a 1.5T MR-linac.

RESULTS

We demonstrate the ability to generate realistic 4D multimodal images that simulate GI motility combined with respiratory and cardiac motion. All modes of motility, except tonic contractions, were observed in the analysis of our cine MRI acquisitions. Peristalsis was the most common. Default parameters estimated from cine MRI were used as initial values for simulation experiments. It is shown that in patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy for abdominal targets, the effects of GI motility can be comparable or larger than the effects of respiratory motion.

CONCLUSION

The digital phantom provides realistic models to aid in medical imaging and radiation therapy research. The addition of GI motility will further contribute to the development, testing, and validation of DIR and dose accumulation algorithms for MR-guided radiotherapy.

Advances in MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy

Image guidance for radiation therapy (RT) has evolved over the last few decades and now is routinely performed using cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT). Conventional linear accelerators (LINACs) that use CBCT have limited soft tissue contrast, are not able to image the patient's internal anatomy during treatment delivery, and most are not capable of online adaptive replanning. RT delivery systems that use MRI have become available within the last several years and address many of the imaging limitations of conventional LINACs. Herein, the authors review the technical characteristics and advantages of MRI-guided RT as well as emerging clinical outcomes.

Feasibility of delivered dose reconstruction for MR-guided SBRT of pancreatic tumors with fast, real-time 3D cine MRI

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In MR-guided SBRT of pancreatic cancer, intrafraction motion is typically monitored with (interleaved) 2D cine MRI. However, tumor surroundings are often not fully captured in these images, and motion might be distorted by through-plane movement. In this study, the feasibility of highly accelerated 3D cine MRI to reconstruct the delivered dose during MR-guided SBRT was assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 3D cine MRI sequence was developed for fast, time-resolved 4D imaging, featuring a low spatial resolution that allows for rapid volumetric imaging at 430 ms. The 3D cines were acquired during the entire beam-on time of 23 fractions of online adaptive MR-guided SBRT for pancreatic tumors on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. A 3D deformation vector field (DVF) was extracted for every cine dynamic using deformable image registration. Next, these DVFs were used to warp the partial dose delivered in the time interval between consecutive cine acquisitions. The warped dose plans were summed to obtain a total delivered dose. The delivered dose was also calculated under various motion correction strategies. Key DVH parameters of the GTV, duodenum, small bowel and stomach were extracted from the delivered dose and compared to the planned dose. The uncertainty of the calculated DVFs was determined with the inverse consistency error (ICE) in the high-dose regions.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) relative (ratio delivered/planned) D_99% of the GTV was 0.94 (0.06), and the mean (SD) relative D_0.5cc of the duodenum, small bowel, and stomach were respectively 0.98 (0.04), 1.00 (0.07), and 0.98 (0.06). In the fractions with the lowest delivered tumor coverage, it was found that significant lateral drifts had occurred. The DVFs used for dose warping had a low uncertainty with a mean (SD) ICE of 0.65 (0.07) mm.

CONCLUSION

We employed a fast, real-time 3D cine MRI sequence for dose reconstruction in the upper abdomen, and demonstrated that accurate DVFs, acquired directly from these images, can be used for dose warping. The reconstructed delivered dose showed only a modest degradation of tumor coverage, mostly attainable to baseline drifts. This emphasizes the need for motion monitoring and development of intrafraction treatment adaptation solutions, such as baseline drift corrections.

Adaptive fractionation at the MR-linac

Objective. Fractionated radiotherapy typically delivers the same dose in each fraction. Adaptive fractionation (AF) is an approach to exploit inter-fraction motion by increasing the dose on days when the distance of tumor and dose-limiting organs at risk (OAR) is large and decreasing the dose on unfavorable days. We develop an AF algorithm and evaluate the concept for patients with abdominal tumors previously treated at the MR-linac in 5 fractions.Approach. Given daily adapted treatment plans, inter-fractional changes are quantified by sparing factorsδ_tdefined as the OAR-to-tumor dose ratio. The key problem of AF is to decide on the dose to deliver in fractiont, givenδ_tand the dose delivered in previous fractions, but not knowing futureδ_ts. Optimal doses that maximize the expected biologically effective dose in the tumor (BED₁₀) while staying below a maximum OAR BED₃constraint are computed using dynamic programming, assuming a normal distribution overδwith mean and variance estimated from previously observed patient-specificδ_ts. The algorithm is evaluated for 16 MR-linac patients in whom tumor dose was compromised due to proximity of bowel, stomach, or duodenum.Main Results. In 14 out of the 16 patients, AF increased the tumor BED₁₀compared to the reference treatment that delivers the same OAR dose in each fraction. However, in 11 of these 14 patients, the increase in BED₁₀was below 1 Gy. Two patients with large sparing factor variation had a benefit of more than 10 Gy BED₁₀increase. For one patient, AF led to a 5 Gy BED₁₀decrease due to an unfavorable order of sparing factors.Significance. On average, AF provided only a small increase in tumor BED. However, AF may yield substantial benefits for individual patients with large variations in the geometry.

Dosimetric impact of intrafraction motion under abdominal compression during MR-guided SBRT for (Peri-) pancreatic tumors

Objective. Intrafraction motion is a major concern for the safety and effectiveness of high dose stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the upper abdomen. In this study, the impact of the intrafraction motion on the delivered dose was assessed in a patient group that underwent MR-guided radiotherapy for upper abdominal malignancies with an abdominal corset. Approach. Fast online 2D cine MRI was used to extract tumor motion during beam-on time. These tumor motion profiles were combined with linac log files to reconstruct the delivered dose in 89 fractions of MR-guided SBRT in twenty patients. Aside the measured tumor motion, motion profiles were also simulated for a wide range of respiratory amplitudes and drifts, and their subsequent dosimetric impact was calculated in every fraction. Main results. The average (SD) D 99% of the gross tumor volume (GTV), relative to the planned D 99%, was 0.98 (0.03). The average (SD) relative D 0.5cc of the duodenum, small bowel and stomach was 0.99 (0.03), 1.00 (0.03), and 0.97 (0.05), respectively. No correlation of respiratory amplitude with dosimetric impact was observed. Fractions with larger baseline drifts generally led to a larger uncertainty of dosimetric impact on the GTV and organs at risk (OAR). The simulations yielded that the delivered dose is highly dependent on the direction of on baseline drift. Especially in anatomies where the OARs are closely abutting the GTV, even modest LR or AP drifts can lead to substantial deviations from the planned dose. Significance. The vast majority of the fractions was only modestly impacted by intrafraction motion, increasing our confidence that MR-guided SBRT with abdominal compression can be safely executed for patients with abdominal tumors, without the use of gating or tracking strategies.

The first reported case of a patient with pancreatic cancer treated with cone beam computed tomography-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR)

BACKGROUND

Online adaptive stereotactic radiotherapy allows for improved target and organ at risk (OAR) delineation and inter-fraction motion management via daily adaptive planning. The use of adaptive SBRT for the treatment of pancreatic cancer (performed until now using only MRI or CT on rails-guided adaptive radiotherapy), has yielded promising outcomes. Herein we describe the first reported case of cone beam CT-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 61-year-old female with metastatic pancreatic cancer presented for durable palliation of a symptomatic primary pancreatic mass. She was prescribed 35 Gy/5 fractions utilizing CT-STAR. The patient was simulated utilizing an end-exhale CT with intravenous and oral bowel contrast. Both initial as well as daily adapted plans were created adhering to a strict isotoxicity approach in which coverage was sacrificed to meet critical luminal gastrointestinal OAR hard constraints. Kilovoltage cone beam CTs were acquired on each day of treatment and the radiation oncologist edited OAR contours to reflect the patient's anatomy-of-the-day. The initial and adapted plan were compared using dose volume histogram objectives, and the superior plan was delivered. Use of the initial treatment plan would have resulted in nine critical OAR hard constraint violations. The adapted plans achieved hard constraints in all five fractions for all four critical luminal gastrointestinal structures.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the successful treatment of a patient with pancreatic cancer treated with CT-STAR. Prior to this treatment, the delivery of ablative adaptive radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer was limited to clinics with MR-guided and CT-on-rails adaptive SBRT technology and workflows. CT-STAR is a promising modality with which to deliver stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

Effect of stomach size on organs at risk in pancreatic stereotactic body radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, the organs at risk (OARs) should be carefully determined when performing pancreatic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We conducted a simulation study to examine the effect of the stomach size on the radiation dose to the OARs when performing pancreatic SBRT.

METHODS

Twenty-five cases were included in this study. Pancreatic head and body tumors were 2-cm-sized pseudotumors, which were included as gross target volume (GTV) contours. The stomach, pancreas, small intestine, liver, kidneys, and spinal cord were considered as the OARs. The prescription dose for planning target volume (PTV) was 40 Gy/5fx, and the dose limit for the OARs was determined. The dose to X% of the OAR volume at X values of 0.1, 5.0, and 10.0 cc (DX) and the percentage of the OAR volume that received more than X Gy were recorded.

RESULTS

In terms of the radiation dose to the pancreatic body tumors, the stomach size was positively correlated with a dose of D10cc [correlation coefficient (r) = 0.5516) to the stomach. The r value between the radiation dose to the pancreatic head tumor and the stomach size was 0.3499. The stomach size and radiation dose to the head and body of the pancreas were positively correlated (pancreatic head D10cc: r = 0.3979, pancreatic body D10cc: r = 0.3209). The larger the stomach, the larger the radiation dose to the healthy portion of the pancreas outside the PTV.

CONCLUSIONS

When performing pancreatic SBRT, the dose to the OARs depends on the stomach size. Reducing the dose to the stomach and pancreas can be achieved by shrinking the stomach.

MRI-guided Radiotherapy (MRgRT) for treatment of Oligometastases: Review of clinical applications and challenges

PURPOSE

Early clinical results on the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) coupled with a linear accelerator to deliver MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) have demonstrated feasibility for safe delivery of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in treatment of oligometastatic disease. Here we set out to review the clinical evidence and challenges associated with MRgRT in this setting.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a systematic review of the literature pertaining to clinical experiences and trials on the use of MRgRT primarily for the treatment of oligometastatic cancers. We reviewed the opportunities and challenges associated with the use of MRgRT.

RESULTS

Benefits of MRgRT pertaining to superior soft-tissue contrast, real-time imaging and gating, and online adaptive radiotherapy facilitate safe and effective dose escalation to oligometastatic tumors while simultaneously sparing surrounding healthy tissues. Challenges concerning further need for clinical evidence and technical considerations related to planning, delivery, quality assurance (QA) of hypofractionated doses, and safety in the MRI environment must be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

The promising early indications of safety and effectiveness of MRgRT for SBRT-based treatment of oligometastatic disease in multiple treatment locations should lead to further clinical evidence to demonstrate the benefit of this technology.

Towards Accurate and Precise Image-Guided Radiotherapy: Clinical Applications of the MR-Linac

Advances in image-guided radiotherapy have brought about improved oncologic outcomes and reduced toxicity. The next generation of image guidance in the form of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will improve visualization of tumors and make radiation treatment adaptation possible. In this review, we discuss the role that MRI plays in radiotherapy, with a focus on the integration of MRI with the linear accelerator. The MR linear accelerator (MR-Linac) will provide real-time imaging, help assess motion management, and provide online adaptive therapy. Potential advantages and the current state of these MR-Linacs are highlighted, with a discussion of six different clinical scenarios, leading into a discussion on the future role of these machines in clinical workflows.

Proton Therapy in the Management of Pancreatic Cancer

Radiation therapy plays a central role in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. While generally shown to be feasible, proton irradiation, particularly when an ablative dose is planned, remains a challenge, especially due to tumor motion and the proximity to organs at risk, like the stomach, duodenum, and bowel. Clinically, standard doses of proton radiation treatment have not been shown to be statistically different from photon radiation treatment in terms of oncologic outcomes and toxicity rates as per non-randomized comparative studies. Fractionation schedules and concurrent chemotherapy combinations are yet to be optimized for proton therapy and are the subject of ongoing trials.

Longitudinal assessment of quality assurance measurements in a 1.5 T MR-linac: Part II-Magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

To describe and report longitudinal quality assurance (QA) measurements for the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) component of the Elekta Unity MR-linac during the first year of clinical use in our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The performance of the MRI component of Unity was evaluated with daily, weekly, monthly, and annual QA testing. The measurements monitor image uniformity, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), resolution/detectability, slice position/thickness, linearity, central frequency, and geometric accuracy. In anticipation of routine use of quantitative imaging (qMRI), we characterize B0/B1 uniformity and the bias/reproducibility of longitudinal/transverse relaxation times (T1/T2) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Tolerance levels for QA measurements of qMRI biomarkers are derived from weekly monitoring of T1, T2, and ADC.

RESULTS

The 1-year assessment of QA measurements shows that daily variations in each MR quality metric are well below the threshold for failure. Routine testing procedures can reproducibly identify machine issues. The longitudinal three-dimensional (3D) geometric analysis reveals that the maximum distortion in a diameter of spherical volume (DSV) of 20, 30, 40, and 50 cm is 0.4, 0.6, 1.0, and 3.1 mm, respectively. The main source of distortion is gradient nonlinearity. Maximum peak-to-peak B0 inhomogeneity is 3.05 ppm, with gantry induced B0 inhomogeneities an order of magnitude smaller. The average deviation from the nominal B1 is within 2%, with minimal dependence on gantry angle. Mean ADC, T1, and T2 values are measured with high reproducibility. The median coefficient of variation for ADC, T1, and T2 is 1.3%, 1.1%, and 0.5%, respectively. The median bias for ADC, T1, and T2 is -0.8%, -0.1%, and 3.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The MRI component of Unity operates within the guidelines and recommendations for scanner performance and stability. Our findings support the recently published guidance in establishing clinically acceptable tolerance levels for image quality. Highly reproducible qMRI measurements are feasible in Unity.

Clinical Implementational and Site-Specific Workflows for a 1.5T MR-Linac

MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) provides opportunities to benefit patients through enhanced use of advanced imaging during treatment for many patients with various cancer treatment sites. This novel technology presents many new challenges which vary based on anatomic treatment location, technique, and potential changes of both tumor and normal tissue during treatment. When introducing new treatment sites, considerations regarding appropriate patient selection, treatment planning, immobilization, and plan-adaption criteria must be thoroughly explored to ensure adequate treatments are performed. This paper presents an institution’s experience in developing a MRgART program for a 1.5T MR-linac for the first 234 patients. The paper suggests practical treatment workflows and considerations for treating with MRgART at different anatomical sites, including imaging guidelines, patient immobilization, adaptive workflows, and utilization of bolus.

MRI-Guided Online Adaptive Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Liver and Pancreas Tumors on an MR-Linac System

Simple Summary

The hybrid magnetic resonance imaging and medical linear accelerator (MR-Linac) systems are expected to revolutionize radiation therapy, uniquely offering high quality soft-tissue contrast and fast imaging to facilitate the online re-planning and guidance of the treatment delivery. While the clinical procedures for stereotactic body radiotherapy are well-established for conventional linacs (with their strengths and weaknesses), they still require significant development and refinement for the MR-Linac systems. Adjustment of fractionation schemes including clinical goals, patient selection, organ motion management, treatment session length, staff logistics, and overall complexity of the online re-planning sessions are key factors that drive the adoption of MR-Linac technologies. In this report, we present the clinical implementation of an MRI-guided radiation therapy workflow, which was used to treat 16 upper gastro-intestinal cancer patients on a 1.5 T MR-Linac platform. The workflow was proven to be feasible for a wide range of clinical scenarios, and the overall treatment session time was significantly reduced as tasks were optimized and the clinical team gradually gained expertise.

Abstract

Purpose: To describe a comprehensive workflow for MRI-guided online adaptive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) specific to upper gastrointestinal cancer patients with abdominal compression on a 1.5T MR-Linac system. Additionally, we discuss the workflow’s clinical feasibility and early experience in the case of 16 liver and pancreas patients. Methods: Eleven patients with liver cancer and five patients with pancreas cancer were treated with online adaptive MRI-guidance under abdominal compression. Two liver patients received single-fraction treatments; the remainder plus all pancreas cancer patients received five fractions. A total of 65 treatment sessions were investigated to provide analytics relevant to the online adaptive processes. The quantification of target and organ motion as well as definition and validation of internal target volume (ITV) margins were performed via multi-contrast imaging provided by three different 2D cine sequences. The plan generation was driven by full re-optimization strategies and using T2-weighted 3D image series acquired by means of a respiratory-triggered exhale phase or a time-averaged imaging protocol. As a pre-requisite for the clinical development of the procedure, the image quality was thoroughly investigated via phantom measurements and numerical simulations specific to upper abdominal sites. The delivery of the online adaptive treatments was facilitated by real-time monitoring with 2D cine imaging. Results: Liver 1-fraction and 5-fraction online adaptive session time were on average 80 and 67.5 min, respectively. The total session length varied between 70–90 min for a single fraction and 55–90 min for five fractions. The pancreas sessions were 54–85 min long with an average session time of 68.2 min. Target visualization on the 2D cine image data varied per patient, with at least one of the 2D cine sequences providing sufficient contrast to confidently identify its location and confirm reproducibility of ITV margins. The mean/range of absolute and relative dose values for all treatment sessions evaluated with ArcCheck were 90.6/80.9–96.1% and 99/95.4–100%, respectively. Conclusion: MR-guidance is feasible for liver and pancreas tumors when abdominal compression is used to reduce organ motion, improve imaging quality, and achieve a robust intra- and inter-fraction patient setup. However, the treatment length is significantly longer than for the conventional linac, and patient compliance is paramount for the successful completion of the treatment. Opportunities for reducing the online adaptive session time should be explored. As the next steps, dose-of-the-day and dose accumulation analysis and tools are needed to enhance the workflow and to help further refine the online re-planning processes.

Inter- and intrafraction motion assessment and accumulated dose quantification of upper gastrointestinal organs during magnetic resonance-guided ablative radiation therapy of pancreas patients

Background and purpose

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is challenging due to significant motion of gastrointestinal (GI) organs. The goal of our study was to quantify inter and intrafraction deformations and dose accumulation of upper GI organs in LAPC patients.

Materials and methods

Five LAPC patients undergoing five-fraction magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) using abdominal compression and daily online plan adaptation to 50 Gy were analyzed. A pre-treatment, verification, and post-treatment MR imaging (MRI) for each of the five fractions (75 total) were used to calculate intra and interfraction motion. The MRIs were registered using Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping (LDDMM) deformable image registration (DIR) method and total dose delivered to stomach_duodenum, small bowel (SB) and large bowel (LB) were accumulated. Deformations were quantified using gradient magnitude and Jacobian integral of the Deformation Vector Fields (DVF). Registration DVFs were geometrically assessed using Dice and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95) between the deformed and physician’s contours. Accumulated doses were then calculated from the DVFs.

Results

Median Dice and HD95 were: Stomach_duodenum (0.9, 1.0 mm), SB (0.9, 3.6 mm), and LB (0.9, 2.0 mm). Median (max) interfraction deformation for stomach_duodenum, SB and LB was 6.4 (25.8) mm, 7.9 (40.5) mm and 7.6 (35.9) mm. Median intrafraction deformation was 5.5 (22.6) mm, 8.2 (37.8) mm and 7.2 (26.5) mm. Accumulated doses for two patients exceeded institutional constraints for stomach_duodenum, one of whom experienced Grade1 acute and late abdominal toxicity.

Conclusion

LDDMM method indicates feasibility to measure large GI motion and accumulate dose. Further validation on larger cohort will allow quantitative dose accumulation to more reliably optimize online MRgRT.