Evaluation and comparison of efficacy and safety of tirzepatide and semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

Role and mechanism of mitochondrial dysfunction‑related gene biomarkers in the progression of type 2 diabetes mellitus

The present study aimed to elucidate the roles and mechanisms of gene biomarkers associated with mitochondrial dysfunction in the progression of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). It conducted an analysis of differentially expressed genes related to mitochondrial dysfunction in T2DM and employed bioinformatics approaches to predict potential target drugs for key biomarkers. Additionally, the present study used the EPIC algorithm to examine immune cell infiltration in T2DM. Furthermore, the single‑cell RNA sequencing dataset GSE221156 was analyzed to identify specific cell types involved in T2DM. The expression of biomarkers was investigated through cellular experiments to assess the effect of marker genes on macrophage polarization. A total of five biomarker genes associated with T2DM were identified, namely ERAP2, HLA‑DQB1, HLA‑DRB5, MAP1B and OAS3. The combined detection of these genes yielded a risk‑predictive area under the curve value of 0.833 for T2DM. These five marker genes may serve as potential targets for valproic acid (VPA). During the progression of T2DM, there is an increase in macrophage numbers, with these genes being highly expressed in macrophages. In a high glucose‑induced RAW264.7 macrophage model, the expressions of MAP1B and OAS3 were upregulated. Notably, the knockdown of OAS3 markedly reduced M1 macrophage polarization, indicating OAS3 facilitates M1 macrophage polarization in a high‑glucose environment. The downregulation of OAS3 expression attenuated M1 macrophage polarization by inhibiting mTORC activation. In conclusion, five candidate biomarkers for T2DM were identified that may serve as therapeutic targets for VPA and are associated with immune infiltration in T2DM. Among these, OAS3 enhances M1 macrophage polarization in a high‑glucose environment by regulating the mTORC1 pathway.

The Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide in Patients with Diabetes and/or Obesity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Background: Obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are major public health concerns. Tirzepatide has shown promise in recent clinical trials. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide in adults with obesity or type 2 diabetes, compared to placebo, GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), and insulin. Method: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched on 17 January 2024, focusing on phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We included studies involving adults with T2D or obesity, comparing tirzepatide to placebo, GLP-1 RAs, or insulin. The primary outcomes were the proportion of participants achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, and ≥15% weight loss targets. Secondary outcomes included changes in body weight, waist circumference, HbA1c levels, and blood pressure. Safety outcomes focused on adverse event rates. Meta-analyses were performed, and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool version 2. Results: Fourteen RCTs involving 14,713 patients were included. Tirzepatide significantly increased the proportion of participants achieving weight loss targets, and reduced body weight, waist circumference, HbA1c, and blood pressure versus placebo and insulin. Compared with GLP-1 RAs, tirzepatide provided comparable or better outcomes in weight loss, waist circumference, and glycemic control. The incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was significantly higher at all doses of tirzepatide compared to placebo and insulin. When compared with GLP-1 RAs, higher doses of tirzepatide were associated with increased risk of nausea, diarrhea, and decreased appetite, but not vomiting. Conclusions: Tirzepatide is an effective option for managing weight and improving metabolic outcomes in patients with T2D or obesity. However, it is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal adverse events, especially at higher doses. Therefore, close monitoring should be considered in clinical practice. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021283449.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular events and risk factors: A review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to systematically evaluate and perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the comprehensive cardiovascular protective effects of various glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), focusing on cardiovascular events and risk factors.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science from inception to December 15, 2024. Included studies were published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing GLP-1RAs to placebo or other GLP-1RAs. Missing data were standardized, and network meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0. Study heterogeneity, publication bias and evidence quality were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA).

RESULTS

As of December 15, 2024, a total of 18 313 articles were retrieved. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 156 high-quality studies were included, incorporating 144 782 patients and 14 different GLP-1RAs. The network meta-analysis demonstrated low heterogeneity, ensuring the reliability of the results. Comprehensive analysis revealed the following: Efpeglenatide was the most effective in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events. Oral semaglutide shows more significant advantages in reducing all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Orforglipron excelled in glycaemic control and weight reduction. SC-Semaglutide showed the greatest efficacy in lowering both systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, Liraglutide showed the greatest efficacy in lowering total cholesterol, Noiiglutide in triglycerides and Taspoglutide in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, but no GLP-1RAs in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. GLP-1RAs did not significantly increase the incidence of adverse events, but Orforglipron and Taspoglutide significantly increased the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

This study compared the cardiovascular benefits of different GLP-1RAs, including reductions in cardiovascular events and improvements in multiple cardiovascular risk factors. However, due to limitations in the quantity and quality of the included studies, the conclusions should be interpreted with caution. Future large-scale, high-quality clinical trials are needed to validate these findings and further optimize comprehensive cardiovascular management strategies for patients.

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with overweight/obesity: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with overweight/obesity using a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to December 20, 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving T2DM patients with overweight/obesity treated with GLP-1RAs, with the control group receiving either a placebo or another GLP-1RA. We conducted a network meta-analysis assessed evidence using CINeMA.

RESULTS

A total of 4548 articles were retrieved, and 41 RCTs were included, comprising 15,126 patients and 13 different GLP-1RAs. Tirzepatide showed superior effects in lowering blood glucose (Compared with placebo, increased glycated hemoglobin: -1.64 (-1.94, -1.35), increased fasting blood glucose: -2.10 (-2.95, -1.25)) and weight loss (Compared with placebo, increased weight: -9.89 (-11.29, -8.49), rincreased BMI: -3.85 (-4.71, -2.99)). However, clinical efficacy of GLP-1RAs in lipid levels, blood pressure, and pancreatic function was not widely observed. Adverse reactions were significant with GLP-1RAs, but overall acceptable.

CONCLUSION

GLP-1RAs demonstrate efficacy and safety in T2DM patients with overweight/obesity, with certain advantages over other drugs. However, due to limitations in the number and quality of included studies, conclusions should be interpreted with caution.

Semaglutide as a GLP-1 Agonist: A Breakthrough in Obesity Treatment

This review addresses the role of semaglutide (SMG), a GLP-1 receptor agonist, in the treatment of obesity and its related comorbidities. Originally developed for type 2 diabetes (DM2), SMG has shown significant efficacy in weight reduction, with superior results compared to other treatments in the same class. Its effects include appetite suppression, increased satiety, and improvements in cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic parameters. Studies such as SUSTAIN, PIONEER, and STEP highlight its superiority compared to other GLP-1 receptor agonists and anti-obesity drugs. The oral formulation showed promising initial results, with higher doses (50 mg) showing weight losses comparable to those of subcutaneous administration. Despite its benefits, there are challenges, such as weight regain after cessation of treatment, gastrointestinal adverse effects, and variability of response. Future studies should explore strategies to mitigate these effects, identify predictive factors of efficacy, and expand therapeutic indications to other conditions related to obesity and insulin resistance. The constant innovation in this class of drugs reinforces the potential of SMG to transform treatment protocols for chronic weight-related diseases.

Real-world Evidence on Oral Semaglutide for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes. A Narrative Review for Clinical Practice

PURPOSE

Oral semaglutide is the first oral glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) available for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management, whose effectiveness and tolerability have extensively been demonstrated in the PIONEER clinical trial program. Nevertheless, data from real-world are crucial to evaluate treatment performance under routine care. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize available evidence regarding real-world utilization patterns of oral semaglutide, and discuss efficacy, safety, and dosing regimen data in routine scenarios.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for real-world studies evaluating oral semaglutide up to August 2024, and specific search terms were: "oral semaglutide," and "real-world studies" or "observational studies" or "retrospective studies".

FINDINGS

19 real-world studies were included in the narrative review. In real-world settings, oral semaglutide provided significant glycemic (median HbA1c reduction at 6 months of 1%) and weight (median body weight reduction of 2 to 3 kg) benefits across the spectrum of T2DM, aligning with pre-clinical evidence from the PIONEER program. No new tolerability and safety issue has emerged from oral semaglutide administration in routine clinical practice.

IMPLICATIONS

Oral semaglutide constitutes an effective and safe option for T2DM management, and its increased acceptance has the potential to favor the early introduction of GLP-1RAs along the disease course. Nevertheless, continuous evaluation of real-world data is critical to better define the optimal positioning of oral semaglutide along T2DM trajectory and fully exploit its potential in everyday clinical practice.

Targeted Therapy Evolution from Defining a Sub-population to Crossing Multi-indications

Purpose

It tends not only to shed lights on an emerging classification framework of disease according to the shared molecular pathogenesis across various organs/tissues, but also to inspire more efficient paradigms of pharmaceutic innovation in a broader medical perspective.

Methods

Literature review and re-thinking.

Results

This article has sorted out an updated profile of the outstanding targeted medications with an extending list of clinical indications in oncology and beyond.

Conclusion

Pharmaceutic development can be processed in a less risky and more affordable manner through drug repurpose or tissue agnostic approval.

Evaluation and comparison of efficacy and safety of tirzepatide, liraglutide and SGLT2i in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to assess the effectiveness and safety of tirzepatide, liraglutide, and SGLT2i in individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

An inquiry was undertaken within the electronic database spanning from its inception to February 11th, 2024, aimed at identifying randomized controlled trials that assess the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide, liraglutide, canagliflozin, ertugliflozin, empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and henagliflozin. Perform a network meta-analysis to examine the distinctions among them (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024537006).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight RCTs were included, involving 8499 participants. Compared with placebo, all treatments improved HbA1c levels: tirzepatide 15 mg reduced HbA1c the most (MD [95% CI], -2.24% [-2.52, -1.96]%), followed by tirzepatide 10 mg (MD [95% CI], -1.99% [-2.29, -1.69]%), tirzepatide 5 mg (MD [95% CI], -1.82% [-2.11, -1.53]%), and liraglutide 1.2 mg (MD [95% CI], -1.23% [-1.41, -1.05]%). Canagliflozin 300 mg also showed a significant reduction in HbA1c (MD [95% CI], -1.00% [-1.18, -0.82]). Tirzepatide was also the most effective in promoting weight loss, with the following results compared with placebo: tirzepatide 15 mg (MD [95% CI], -8.74 kg [-9.83, -7.66] kg), tirzepatide 10 mg (MD [95% CI], -7.13 kg [-8.40, -5.88] kg), tirzepatide 5 mg (MD [95% CI], -5.38 kg [-6.65, -4.11] kg), canagliflozin 300 mg (MD [95% CI], -2.31 kg [-2.79, -1.83] kg), and empagliflozin 10 mg (MD [95% CI], -2.00 kg [-2.44, -1.55] kg). In reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP), canagliflozin 300 mg showed the greatest effect (MD [95% CI], -5.96% [-7.96, -3.96] %). For diastolic blood pressure (DBP), henagliflozin 5 mg demonstrated the most significant reduction compared to placebo (MD [95% CI], -2.46% [-3.82, -1.10] %). Liraglutide 1.8 mg was most likely to cause adverse events (AE) (OR [95% CI], 2.57 [1.78, 3.70]), but there was no significant difference in serious adverse events (SAEs) between the interventions (including placebo).

CONCLUSION

Out of the seven medications examined in this study, tirzepatide demonstrates the most effective antidiabetic and weight-reducing effects. Furthermore, the dosage of Liraglutide at 1.2 mg and above demonstrates a more pronounced hypoglycemic effect in comparison to SGLT2 inhibitors. SGLT2 inhibitors exhibit a distinct hypotensive effect and are suitable for diabetic individuals experiencing hypertension.

Efficacy and safety of tirzepatide versus placebo in overweight or obese adults without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Tirzepatide was approved to treat type 2 diabetes and obesity, but its efficacy and safety in patients without diabetes has not been investigated.

AIM

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide compared to placebo in overweight or obese patients without diabetes.

METHOD

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were searched on January 18, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that used tirzepatide in overweight or obese adults without diabetes were included. Efficacy outcomes included the proportion of participants achieving weight loss targets, changes in body weight (%), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and blood pressure (BP). Safety outcomes were commonly reported adverse events. Standardized mean differences (SMD) or odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively.

RESULTS

Three RCTs with 3901 participants were included. Tirzepatide was associated with increased proportion of participants achieving weight loss targets, reduced body weight (SMD - 1.61, 95% CI - 2.20 to - 1.02), BMI (SMD - 2.13, 95% CI - 3.08 to - 1.18), WC (SMD - 0.91, 95% CI - 1.14 to - 0.69), and BP versus placebo. However, the risk of adverse events such as nausea (OR 4.26, 95% CI 2.60 to 3.81), vomiting (OR 8.35, 95% CI 5.19 to 13.45), and diarrhea (OR 3.57, 95% CI 2.80 to 4.57) was significantly higher for tirzepatide versus placebo.

CONCLUSION

Tirzepatide significantly reduced weight and improved metabolic markers among overweight or obese without diabetes. However, increased adverse events highlights the need for benefits versus risks assessment before initiation and continuous monitoring.

Exploring the Impact of Semaglutide on Cognitive Function and Anxiety-Related Behaviors in a Murine Model of Alzheimer's Disease

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most prevalent form of dementia, is characterized by progressive cognitive decline and behavioral disturbances, with an increasing incidence as the global population ages. This study investigates the effects of semaglutide (SEM), a glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, on cognitive function and anxiety-like behavior in a transgenic murine model of AD.

METHODS

20 mice were randomly distributed into the following groups (n = 5): (WT + VEH) group: C57BL/6J + saline, (WT + SEM) group: C57BL/6J + semaglutide, (AD + VEH) group: AD + saline, (AD + SEM) group: AD + semaglutide. The animals underwent a four-week treatment, during which we monitored blood glucose levels, body weight, and responses in an open field test, novel object recognition test, social chamber test, and 0-maze test.

RESULTS

Post-treatment, SEM significantly reduced blood glucose levels in AD mice, aligning them with those of wild-type controls. Cognitive assessments indicated an improvement in the investigation index for SEM-treated mice compared to those receiving a vehicle, suggesting cognitive benefits. Although SEM did not significantly enhance motor and exploratory activities, it displayed a potential anxiolytic effect, particularly evident in the combined anxiety index, with notable differences observed before and after treatment in the AD group.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this pilot study suggest that SEM may play a dual role in managing AD by improving glycemic control and potentially enhancing cognitive function. As the landscape of AD treatment evolves, the comprehensive approach of utilizing SEM could pave the way for innovative interventions targeting the complex interplay of metabolic and cognitive dysfunctions in this challenging neurodegenerative disorder.

Subcutaneously administered tirzepatide vs semaglutide for adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of s.c. administered tirzepatide vs s.c. administered semaglutide for adults of both sexes with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Cochrane up to 11 November 2023 for RCTs with an intervention duration of at least 12 weeks assessing s.c. tirzepatide at maintenance doses of 5 mg, 10 mg or 15 mg once weekly, or s.c. semaglutide at maintenance doses of 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg or 2.0 mg once weekly, in adults with type 2 diabetes, regardless of background glucose-lowering treatment. Eligible trials compared any of the specified doses of tirzepatide and semaglutide against each other, placebo or other glucose-lowering drugs. Primary outcomes were changes in HbA1c and body weight from baseline. Secondary outcomes were achievement of HbA1c target of ≤48 mmol/mol (≤6.5%) or <53 mmol/mol (<7.0%), body weight loss of at least 10%, and safety outcomes including gastrointestinal adverse events and severe hypoglycaemia. We used version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB 2) to assess the risk of bias, conducted frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses and evaluated confidence in effect estimates utilising the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework.

RESULTS

A total of 28 trials with 23,622 participants (44.2% female) were included. Compared with placebo, tirzepatide 15 mg was the most efficacious treatment in reducing HbA1c (mean difference -21.61 mmol/mol [-1.96%]) followed by tirzepatide 10 mg (-20.19 mmol/mol [-1.84%]), semaglutide 2.0 mg (-17.74 mmol/mol [-1.59%]), tirzepatide 5 mg (-17.60 mmol/mol [-1.60%]), semaglutide 1.0 mg (-15.25 mmol/mol [-1.39%]) and semaglutide 0.5 mg (-12.00 mmol/mol [-1.09%]). In between-drug comparisons, all tirzepatide doses were comparable with semaglutide 2.0 mg and superior to semaglutide 1.0 mg and 0.5 mg. Compared with placebo, tirzepatide was more efficacious than semaglutide for reducing body weight, with reductions ranging from 9.57 kg (tirzepatide 15 mg) to 5.27 kg (tirzepatide 5 mg). Semaglutide had a less pronounced effect, with reductions ranging from 4.97 kg (semaglutide 2.0 mg) to 2.52 kg (semaglutide 0.5 mg). In between-drug comparisons, tirzepatide 15 mg, 10 mg and 5 mg demonstrated greater efficacy than semaglutide 2.0 mg, 1.0 mg and 0.5 mg, respectively. Both drugs increased incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events compared with placebo, while neither tirzepatide nor semaglutide increased the risk of serious adverse events or severe hypoglycaemia.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Our data show that s.c. tirzepatide had a more pronounced effect on HbA1c and weight reduction compared with s.c. semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes. Both drugs, particularly higher doses of tirzepatide, increased gastrointestinal adverse events.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022382594.

Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide on Glycaemic and Non-glycaemic Outcomes in Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses

Tirzepatide is a novel once-a-week dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, recently approved for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. A systematic review of the literature published in multiple meta-analyses on Tirzepatide with emphasis on its effect on glycaemic and non-glycaemic parameters was conducted. We systematically searched the electronic databases PubMed and Google Scholar up to August 2023 for meta-analyses that compared Tirzepatide with placebo or active antihyperglycaemic drugs in subjects with T2DM. Various parameters for efficacy and safety, with their point estimates and confidence intervals, such as glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting serum glucose (FSG), body weight, lipid, and cardiovascular outcomes were assessed. Six meta-analyses fulfilled the pre-specified criteria and were included in the study. In all the studies, Tirzepatide treatment at different doses resulted in a significant reduction in HbA1c and FSG levels along with a significant reduction in weight compared with active control and placebo groups. Tirzepatide significantly reduced levels of triglycerides and increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, whether used as monotherapy or add-on therapy. The studies suggested the cardiovascular safety of Tirzepatide as there was no increase in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The drug shows lesser hypoglycemia but predominant gastrointestinal adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea. In conclusion, Tirzepatide shows superior glycaemic control and weight loss in patients with T2DM with beneficial effects on lipids, without an increased risk of hypoglycemia and cardiovascular events.