Knowledge needs for implementing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among primary care providers in a safety-net health system

Identifying Provider-Level Barriers to Provision of PrEP Services for Cisgender Women: Application of the Disclosure Decision-Making Model

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective but underutilized by cisgender women. Physicians are important gatekeepers to PrEP access. Factors that shape providers' decisions to discuss PrEP with female patients are not well elucidated in the literature. We sought to understand these decisions through the lens of the Disclosure Decision-Making Model because discussion of PrEP with a patient shares many commonalities with HIV status disclosure. We interviewed physicians caring for women in HIV endemic regions in the US (N = 21). When adapted to reflect the clinical context, the DD-MM was well suited to characterize the factors influencing providers' willingness to disclose PrEP information. Assessments of information, receiver, clinical recommendation, and efficacy of disclosure-shaped providers' decision to disclose. We describe the unique considerations and articulate theoretical and practical implications to inform the development of interventions to improve equity in PrEP provision.

Determinants of Familiarity and Experience with HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Primary Care Providers in Ontario, Canada

BACKGROUND

Despite increased access to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Canada, familiarity and experience among primary care providers (PCPs)-including family doctors and those working with key populations-remains limited. To understand the barriers and facilitators of PrEP familiarity and experience, we conducted a situational analysis in PCPs in sub-urban and rural Ontario.

METHODS

We surveyed a non-probabilistic sample of PCPs using an online questionnaire, designed with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Poisson regressions with robust variance were used to assess the relationship between CFIR domains, sociodemographic, and practice characteristics on both PrEP familiarity and experience.

RESULTS

A total of 54 PCPs participated (6% response rate), comprising 80% physicians and 20% nurses. Nearly 30% of the sample worked with key populations, including sexual health clinics and community care centers, 18% of respondents reported high familiarity with PrEP, and 44% reported PrEP experience (referred, started a conversation, or prescribed). PrEP familiarity and experience were associated with working in an organization serving key populations, working with gender minorities, and having colleagues providing PrEP. Providers with a positive perception of PrEP and its necessity for populations at risk were more likely to have PrEP-related experience. Higher familiarity and experience were reported by PCPs with specific clinical skills related to PrEP, and with the perception that PrEP was compatible with their practice as primary provider.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that organizational support, and additional training and education would facilitate PrEP provision by PCPs in suburban/rural Ontario.

Mapping Implementation Strategies to Address Barriers to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Women Through POWER Up (Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Optimization Among Women to Enhance Retention and Uptake): Content Analysis

BACKGROUND

Black cisgender women (hereafter referred to as "women") experience one of the highest incidences of HIV among all populations in the United States. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective biomedical HIV prevention option, but uptake among women is low. Despite tailored strategies for certain populations, including men who have sex with men and transgender women, Black women are frequently overlooked in HIV prevention efforts. Strategies to increase PrEP awareness and use among Black women are needed at multiple levels (ie, community, system or clinic, provider, and individual or patient).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake and persistence among Black cisgender women and to map implementation strategies to identified barriers using the CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research)-ERIC (Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change) Implementation Strategy Matching Tool.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of previous qualitative studies completed by a multidisciplinary team of HIV physicians, implementation scientists, and epidemiologists. Studies involved focus groups and interviews with medical providers and women at a federally qualified health center in Chicago, Illinois. Implementation science frameworks such as the CFIR were used to investigate determinants of PrEP use among Black women. In this secondary analysis, data from 45 total transcripts were analyzed. We identified barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake and persistence among cisgender women across each CFIR domain. The CFIR-ERIC Implementation Strategy Matching Tool was used to map appropriate implementation strategies to address barriers and increase PrEP uptake among Black women.

RESULTS

Barriers to PrEP uptake were identified across the CFIR domains. Barriers included being unaware that PrEP was available (characteristics of individuals), worrying about side effects and impacts on fertility and pregnancy (intervention characteristics), and being unsure about how to pay for PrEP (outer setting). Providers identified lack of training (characteristics of individuals), need for additional clinical support for PrEP protocols (inner setting), and need for practicing discussions about PrEP with women (intervention characteristics). ERIC mapping resulted in 5 distinct implementation strategies to address barriers and improve PrEP uptake: patient education, provider training, PrEP navigation, clinical champions, and electronic medical record optimization.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based implementation strategies that address individual, provider, and clinic factors are needed to engage women in the PrEP care continuum. Tailoring implementation strategies to address identified barriers increases the probability of successfully improving PrEP uptake. Our results provide an overview of a comprehensive, multilevel implementation strategy (ie, "POWER Up") to improve PrEP uptake among women.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

RR2-10.1371/journal.pone.0285858.

CDC Prioritizes HIV Prevention and Treatment to Reduce HIV Disparities Among Cis-Gender Black Women

To succeed in ending the HIV epidemic in the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) focuses on delivering combinations of scientifically proven, cost-effective, and scalable interventions to priority populations. Systemic factors continue to contribute to persistent health disparities and disproportionately higher rates of HIV diagnosis in some communities. The National HIV/AIDS Strategy has designated cis-gender Black women (CgBW) as a priority population to address the racial and ethnic inequities in HIV. This report presents the portfolio of projects, programs, and initiatives funded by the CDC's Division of HIV Prevention (DHP) to address disparities in HIV and improve health and QOL among CgBW. These funded activities include the development, planning, and implementation of HIV prevention programs, mass media campaigns, and behavioral interventions focused on CgBW. This report also summarizes DHP's community engagement, capacity building, and partnership efforts, and highlights research and surveillance activities focusing on CgBW. Finally, this report outlines future directions for CDC's efforts to improve access to HIV testing, treatment, and prevention for CgBW in the United States.

Psychiatry and Family Medicine Residents' Likelihood of Prescribing HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis to Patients With Mental Illness and HIV Vulnerability

BACKGROUND

People living with mental illness (PLMI) experience disproportionately high incidence of and vulnerability to HIV. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective and safe HIV prevention method, but data regarding prescription to PLMI are lacking. Psychiatrists may serve as important points of access for PrEP prescription for PLMI.

METHODS

We conducted a vignette-based study of residents in psychiatry and family medicine (FM) to assess likelihood of prescribing PrEP and assumptions about the fictional patient. Participants were randomized to one of five vignettes in which the patients' psychiatric diagnosis was varied (schizophrenia on long-acting injectable or oral antipsychotic, bipolar disorder, major depression) or a control vignette without a psychiatric diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 439 residents participated. We found that high percentages of psychiatry (96.8%) and FM (97.4%) residents were aware of PrEP. High percentages of psychiatry (92.0%-98.1%) and FM (80.8%-100%) residents reported that PrEP was indicated for all patient conditions. Family medicine residents were more likely to prescribe PrEP to all experimental conditions than psychiatry residents. There was no difference in likelihood of prescribing to the control condition without a psychiatric diagnosis. The belief that PrEP prescription was out of scope of practice was greater among psychiatry residents.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of psychiatry residents responded that PrEP was indicated for an array of patients with psychiatric diagnoses. However, psychiatry residents were broadly less likely to prescribe PrEP to patients with these diagnoses. The high percentage of psychiatry residents who reported that PrEP was indicated for all patients suggests that additional training is needed to facilitate PrEP prescription by psychiatrists.

Increasing providers' PrEP prescription for Black cisgender women: A qualitative study to improve provider knowledge and competency via PrEP training

BACKGROUND

Awareness and uptake of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remains low among Black/African American cisgender women, partly due to low self-reported PrEP knowledge and comfort among primary care providers. Ensuring providers are trained on PrEP is crucial, as increased PrEP knowledge is associated with higher rates of PrEP prescription.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop a PrEP training for providers to improve their self-efficacy in discussing and prescribing PrEP for Black women, with the ultimate goal of increasing PrEP awareness and utilization among Black women.

DESIGN

In this qualitative study, we conducted focus groups with medical providers at three federally qualified health centers in the Southern and Midwestern United States to identify themes informing the development of a provider PrEP training.

METHODS

Providers were asked for input on content/design of PrEP training. Transcripts underwent rapid qualitative analysis using the Stanford Lightning Report Method. Themes were identified and presented under the domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

RESULTS

Ten providers completed four focus groups. Themes included the individual characteristics of providers (low comfort initiating PrEP discussions, particularly among White providers) and the outer setting of client attitudes (perceptions of potential provider bias/racism, varying levels of concern about HIV acquisition). Opportunities were identified to maximize the benefit of training design (e.g., developing case scenarios to enhance providers' cultural competency with Black women and PrEP knowledge).

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive PrEP training features both didactic material and interactive role-plays to equip providers with the clinical knowledge for prescribing PrEP while building their competency discussing PrEP with Black women. This training is particularly important for providers who have racial or gender discordance with Black women and express lower comfort discussing PrEP with these clients. Provider training could lead to minimizing racial- and gender-based inequities in PrEP use.

Adapting Provider Training and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Advertising to Increase Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Awareness and Uptake Among Black Cisgender Women

Black cisgender women (hereafter referred to as "women") have disproportionately high rates of HIV infection yet low rates of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) utilization. Barriers to PrEP uptake exist at the system, provider, and individual/client level. To learn how existing training and advertising can be adapted to address race- and sex-based gaps within PrEP service delivery, we conducted focus groups with providers and Black women. Participants were recruited at three health care organizations in the Midwest and South, screened for eligibility, and consented verbally. Focus groups occurred from August 2022 to February 2023. Women were asked about their knowledge and thoughts on PrEP. Providers were asked about factors influencing their decision-making about PrEP. A codebook was developed based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Transcripts were coded using the Stanford Lightning Report Method. We completed four focus groups with 10 providers and 9 focus groups with 25 women. Three major themes emerged: (1) low comfort level and limited cultural sensitivity/competency among providers discussing HIV risk and PrEP with Black women, (2) women's concerns about PrEP's side effects and safety during pregnancy, and (3) lack of Black women representation in PrEP advertisement/educational materials. In addition, women in the South reported general medical mistrust and specific misconceptions about PrEP. PrEP trainings for providers need detailed information about the safety of PrEP for women and should include role-playing to enhance cultural competency. Likewise, PrEP advertisements/materials should incorporate information regarding side effects and images/experiences of Black women to increase PrEP awareness and uptake among this population. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT05626452.

Knowledge, sex, and region associated with primary care providers prescribing adolescents HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis

Although HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively and safely prevents HIV among adolescents, uptake of PrEP is low. Adolescents must have primary care providers (PCPs) prescribe them PrEP, making PCPs critical actors in PrEP delivery. However, research has primarily investigated determinants of PCPs' intention to prescribe adolescents PrEP rather than the determinants of performing the behavior itself. We examined the demographic, clinical practice, and implementation determinants of PCPs previously prescribing PrEP to adolescents. PCPs were recruited from a national Qualtrics panel of licensed medical providers in the United States from July 15-August 19, 2022. The Theoretical Domains Framework informed the implementation determinants measured. A multivariable logistic regression was used. PCPs who were more knowledgeable of the CDC guidelines (aOR 2.97, 95% CI 2.16-4.10), who were assigned male at birth (aOR 1.64, 95% CI 1.03-2.59), and who practiced in the Western region (aOR 1.85, 95% CI 1.04-3.30) had greater odds of prior prescribing adolescents PrEP. Provider-based educational interventions should be designed, implemented, and tested to encourage PCPs to prescribe PrEP to eligible adolescents.

POWER Up-Improving pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among Black cisgender women in the Southern United States: Protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial (SW-CRT)

BACKGROUND

HIV disproportionately affects Black/African American cisgender women (hereafter women) in the United States. Despite its proven effectiveness, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention remains vastly under-prescribed to women based on their need. Increasing PrEP uptake and persistence among women is crucial to reducing HIV transmission; however, there have been few studies designed specifically for women. This article describes the study protocol used to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of implementation strategies to improve PrEP uptake and persistence among Black women in the Midwest and South.

METHODS

PrEP Optimization among Women to Enhance Retention and Uptake (POWER Up) is an evidence-based, woman-focused set of five implementation science strategies that addresses barriers of PrEP utilization at the provider, patient, and clinic levels. POWER Up includes 1) routine PrEP education for patients, 2) standardized provider training, 3) electronic medical record (EMR) optimization, 4) PrEP navigation, and 5) PrEP clinical champions. These strategies will be adapted to specific clinics for implementation, tested via a stepped-wedge trial, and, if effective, packaged for further dissemination.

DISCUSSION

We will utilize a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial (SW-CRT) to measure change in PrEP utilization across diverse geographic areas. Preparation for adapting and implementing the bundle of strategies is needed to determine how to tailor them to specific clinics. Implementation challenges will include adapting strategies with the available resources at each site, maintaining stakeholder involvement and staff buy-in, adjusting the study protocol and planned procedures as needed, and ensuring minimal crossover. Additionally, strengths and limitations of each strategy must be examined before, during, and after the adaptation and implementation processes. Finally, the implementation outcomes of the strategies must be evaluated to determine the real-world success of the strategies. This study is an important step toward addressing the inequity in PrEP service delivery and increasing PrEP utilization among Black women in the U.S.

Integrating HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Education During Medical Residency: Training Outcomes and Suggestions for Learning Effectiveness

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is now preventable with pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) drugs, however, barriers to PrEP implementation include primary-care physician (PCP) knowledge-gap and lack of comfort prescribing and managing PrEP. We hypothesized that integrating HIV-PrEP education during medical-residency would help address these problems and developed a 40-minute case-based lecture focused on the 2021 United States Preventative Services Taskforce (USPSTF) oral HIV-PrEP guidelines and integrated this into our residency's core curriculum. We analyzed data from physician-trainees who voluntarily completed a pre- and post-lecture survey measuring HIV-PrEP "knowledge" and "self-assessed readiness to independently initiate and manage PrEP." Independent group analysis was completed via the Mann-Whitney U and Pearson Chi-square 2-sided test with P-value <0.05 deemed significant. Of the total of 189 residents invited to the lecture, 130 (69%) completed the pre-survey while 107 (57%) completed the post-survey. Per knowledge-assessment: the median number of correctly answered questions rose from a pre-lecture baseline of 4/9 (44%) to 8/9 (89%) following the education intervention (P < .001). When asked about comfort initiating and managing HIV-PrEP on their own, 7/130 (5.4%) responded in agreement pre-lecture, but this rose to 55/107 (51.4%) post-lecture (P < .001). Our study revealed PrEP training during residency was effective per stated objectives and may be an important tool to increase PrEP delivery/uptake to achieve the target goals for the National HIV/AIDS Strategy.

Knowledge and Attitude About Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Among Primary Care Clinicians at a Federally Qualified Health Center in Central Texas: A Cross-sectional Study

ABSTRACT

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention is a highly effective tool in preventing HIV, yet PrEP is underprescribed. Primary care providers are ideally positioned to increase access to and awareness of PrEP, but health care providers' knowledge of PrEP greatly varies. To evaluate PrEP knowledge and attitudes of primary care providers, we conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study examining primary providers' knowledge and concerns about PrEP. Participants ( n = 122) included physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and residency trainees in family medicine, internal medicine, and obstetrics. Despite high awareness of PrEP among these primary care providers (91.7%), fewer reported feeling comfortable prescribing PrEP (62.5%), and the average number of PrEP prescriptions per provider written in the last 6 months was less than 1. PrEP remains key to preventing HIV, but prescriptions remain low. Health care providers would benefit from additional education and training on communicating with their patients about sexual health and HIV prevention.

Differences Between General Internal Medicine and Family Medicine Physicians' Initiation of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis

OBJECTIVE

Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is under-utilized in primary care. Given differences in treatment approaches for other conditions between family medicine (FM) and general internal medicine (GIM), this study compared PrEP-prescribing between FM and GIM physicians.

METHODS

De-identified electronic health record data from a multi-state health care system was used in this retrospective observational study. The time period from 1/1/13 to 9/30/21 was used to identify PrEP eligible patients using measures of current sexually transmitted disease and condomless sex at the time of eligibility. Receipt of PrEP was measured in the 12 months after PrEP eligibility. The odds of receiving PrEP in GIM as compared to FM was computed before and after adjusting for demographics and physical and psychiatric comorbidities.

RESULTS

The majority of eligible patients were 18 to 39 years of age, 60.9% were female and 71.6% were White race. Among PrEP eligible patients, 1.1% received PrEP in the first year after index date. Receiving PrEP was significantly more likely among patients treated in GIM versus FM (OR = 2.30; 95% CI:1.63-3.25). After adjusting for covariates, this association remained statistically significant (OR = 2.02; 95% CI:1.41-2.89).

CONCLUSIONS

PrEP is grossly under-utilized in primary care. The majority of Americans enter the health care system through primary care and not through HIV providers or other specialties. Therefore, educational interventions are needed to increase confidence and knowledge and to encourage PrEP prescribing by FM and GIM physicians.

Provider Perspectives on Factors Affecting the PrEP Care Continuum Among Black Cisgender Women in the Midwest United States: Applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

BACKGROUND

To End the HIV Epidemic and reduce the number of incident HIV infections in the United States by 90%, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake and persistence among cisgender women, particularly racial and ethnic minority women, must be increased. Medical providers play a pivotal role across the PrEP care continuum.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we explored health care provider perspectives on facilitators and barriers to PrEP implementation strategies for Black cisgender women in the Midwest United States. Data were analyzed using a deductive thematic content analysis approach.

RESULTS

A total of 10 medical providers completed individual qualitative interviews. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework, we identified intervention characteristics (cost, dosing, and adherence), individual patient and provider level factors (self-efficacy, knowledge, and attitudes), and systematic barriers (inner setting and outer setting) that ultimately lead to PrEP inequalities. Implementation strategies to improve the PrEP care continuum identified include provider training, electronic medical record optimization, routine patient education, and PrEP navigation.

CONCLUSION

This study provides (1) medical provider insight into implementation factors that can be modified to improve the PrEP care continuum for Black cisgender women and (2) an implementation research logic model to guide future studies.

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV in Primary Care and Beyond

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is antiretroviral medication used to prevent HIV in patients at increased risk of acquisition due to sexual practices or intravenous drug use. Despite strong evidence of efficacy and safety, PrEP is currently underutilized in the United States. Initial testing includes HIV, hepatitis B, and renal function. There are currently two oral medications approved for daily use within the U.S.; regular monitoring for HIV and renal dysfunction is required with both medications.

Effectiveness of an electronic health record model for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is extremely effective when taken correctly, though grossly under-prescribed for at-risk patients. We initiated a best practice advisory (BPA) in the Epic electronic medical record (EMR) to identify patients who met criteria for PrEP use. We evaluated this model to determine its effectiveness in identifying patients and its use by providers for increasing prescription of PrEP. The BPA fired 145 times with five total new PrEP prescriptions. Over half of the patients identified were cisgender women, a group that is both under prescribed PrEP and missed by prior EMR PrEP algorithms. Half of the patients were African American, a group at high risk of HIV infection. Though the model was effective at identifying patients, provider initiation of PrEP or acknowledgment of the BPA was low. Further education of providers regarding PrEP usage and expansion of BPA messages are needed to increase rates of PrEP initiation.

Healthcare needs of people living with human immunodeficiency virus: A qualitative descriptive study

AIM

A better understanding about the health care and support needs is beneficial to maintain the linkage between People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLWH) and healthcare services. This study aims to explore the healthcare needs of PLWH from their perspectives.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive study design was undertaken in July 2017 to June 2018.

METHODS

Fourteen participants were recruited by purposive sampling technique. Face-to-face in-depth interview and focus-group discussion (FGD) were conducted and analysed using content analysis.

RESULTS

Data revealed five themes, namely the needs to be free from stigma and discrimination, strengthen life spirit, have safe sexual practices, social support, and have accessible and affordable healthcare services.

CONCLUSION

People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus have their own perspectives on their healthcare needs. Therefore, nurses and other healthcare providers need to explore, understand, and respond to the needs, and incorporate them into comprehensive and holistic care.

Brief Report: HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Prescribing in an Urban Safety-Net Health System

INTRODUCTION

Safety-net health systems are key settings for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implementation, but little evidence is available about the frequency of PrEP prescribing in safety-net settings. We assessed PrEP prescribing among people with indications for PrEP at an urban safety-net health system that serves a county designated as an Ending the HIV Epidemic priority jurisdiction.

METHODS

We identified adults (aged 18 years or older) who engaged in primary care between January 2015 and December 2019 and had a documented indication for PrEP. PrEP indications included the presence of a behavioral or sexual risk factor of HIV acquisition or a positive bacterial sexually transmitted infection at the index visit. PrEP prescribing was defined as the proportion of patients with indications for PrEP who received a new prescription for PrEP. We estimated the cumulative incidence of PrEP prescription with corresponding 95% confidence limits (CL).

RESULTS

Our study population comprised 2957 individuals, of whom 58% was aged younger than 45 years, 56% was women, 67% was racial or ethnic minorities, and 60% was uninsured or provided care as part of a hospital-based managed care plan for individuals without insurance. We identified 41 individuals who were prescribed PrEP. The cumulative incidence of PrEP prescribing within 1 year of the first documented PrEP indication was 1.3% (95% CL: 0.91% to 1.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest extremely low frequency of PrEP prescribing among people with indications for PrEP in an urban safety-net health system. Strategies are needed to improve PrEP implementation in high-priority populations and safety-net settings.