Assessment of Pain During Endotracheal Suction In the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Effects of endotracheal suctioning duration cerebral oxygenation in preterm infants

AIM

This study evaluates the effects of endotracheal suctioning duration on cerebral oxygenation and physiological parameters in preterm infants in intensive care.

DESIGN

Prospective and observational study.

METHOD

In this study, 51 preterm infants born at 28-34 weeks of gestation in NICU were evaluated. Cerebral oxygenation was measured before, during, and after endotracheal suctioning with near-infrared spectroscopy. Pain levels of the infants were with N-PASS scale.

RESULTS

A negative correlation was found between the lowest cerebral oxygenation value during endotracheal suctioning and the duration of endotracheal suctioning. Cerebral oxygenation levels during endotracheal suctioning were lower than pre- and post-endotracheal suctioning levels. Higher cerebral oxygenation was observed in infants whose endotracheal aspiration time was less than 13 s. The duration of endotracheal suctioning was positively correlated with pain and cerebral oxygenation stabilization time.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged endotracheal suctioning duration negatively affects cerebral oxygenation in preterm infants. The study suggests an optimal endotracheal suctioning duration under 13 s.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

Properly executed endotracheal suctioning, with the correct technique and knowledge, can alleviate the adverse physiological effects observed in preterm infants and contribute to routine nursing care in intensive care units.

REPORTING METHOD

This study has been reported in line with STROBE checklists.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution was required to design or undertake this research. Patients contributed only to the data collection.

IMPACT

This study contributes to defining the ideal endotracheal aspiration duration, as there is not enough data so far. It showed the effect of prolonged endotracheal aspiration time on cerebral oxygenation, pain and physiological parameters in preterm infants.

The effects of open and closed suctioning systems on neonatal pain and vital signs in neonatal intensive care units

BACKGROUND

Endotracheal suctioning is a procedure used by neonatal intensive care unit nurses to maximize oxygenation and clear airways of secretions, and is one of the most common painful procedures causing stress in intubated newborns.

AIM

This aim of this study is to compare the effects of open and closed endotracheal suctioning on pain, peak heart rate and oxygen saturation in neonates on mechanicalventilation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This experimental-design study was conducted on 30 newborns who were mechanically ventilated in the tertiary neonatal intensive care unit of a public hospital. First, closed suctioning and then open suctioning was performed on patients during the day. Pain, peak heart rate and oxygen saturation levels were evaluated before, during and 30 min after each suctioning procedure.

RESULTS

Of the newborns included in the study, 53.3 % were male and 36.6 % were admitted to intensive care unit due to a heart defect. No statistically significant differences were found in pain, peak heart rate, or oxygen saturation between the open and closed suctioning methods. However, oxygen saturation levels during suctioning were lower compared to levels before and 30 min after the procedure. Additionally, peak heart rate was lower during suctioning compared to 30 min afterward.

CONCLUSIONS

The study concludes that there is no significant difference between open and closed suctioning techniques concerning pain, peak heart rate, and oxygen saturation.

IMPLICATIONS TO PRACTICE

Given its sterility and ease of use, the closed suction method may be preferable in clinical settings.

A scoping review of pain resulting from the endotracheal suctioning of paediatric intensive care patients

BACKGROUND

This scoping review was conducted to summarise and map studies on pain resulting from endotracheal suctioning in paediatric intensive care patients.

METHOD

This scoping review conducted in June 2022 was performed by screening articles published in English. Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, MedLine and Ovid databases were used for screening. The keywords 'endotracheal suctioning', 'pain', 'paediatric intensive care' and their synonyms were used in the search.

RESULTS

During the review, 280 articles were accessed, and the full texts of 14 articles were evaluated for suitability. After some of the articles were excluded from the study, abstracts of nine articles were given below.

CONCLUSION

It is recommended that a greater number of randomised controlled studies should be conducted, because the number of studies with a high level of evidence on the effect of endotracheal suctioning on the pain levels of patients in the paediatric intensive care unit is very few.

The effect of swaddling method applied to preterm infants during the aspiration procedure on pain

PURPOSE

The study was carried out to determine the effect of the swaddling method on pain in preterm infants (between 27 and 36 weeks) hospitalized in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit during the aspiration procedure. Preterm infants were recruited by convenience sampling from level III neonatal intensive care units in a city in Turkey.

METHOD

The study was conducted in a randomized controlled trial manner. The study consisted of preterm infants (n = 70) receiving care or treatment at a neonatal intensive care unit. While swaddling was applied to the infants in the experimental group before the aspiration process. The pain was assessed before, during, and after the nasal aspiration using the Premature Infant Pain Profile.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found in terms of pre-procedural pain scores whereas a statistically significant difference was detected in terms of pain scores during and after the procedure between the groups.

CONCLUSION

It was determined in the study that the swaddling method reduced the pain of the preterm infants during the aspiration procedure.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study emphasized that swaddling had pain-reducing during the aspiration procedure in the neonatal intensive care unit in preterm infants. It is recommended that future studies be conducted using different invasive procedures in preterm infants born earlier.

Discriminant properties of the Behavioral Pain Scale for assessment of procedural pain-related distress in ventilated children

OBJECTIVES

Children hospitalized in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are frequently exposed to distressing and painful medical procedures and interventions. There is a lack of clinical scales to measure procedural pain-related distress in ventilated children. The Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) was initially developed to detect procedural pain in critically ill adults. This study aims to assess the BPS's discriminant properties for measuring procedural pain-related distress in ventilated pediatric patients incorporating two instruments validated for pediatric patients.

METHODS

This prospective exploratory study was performed with ventilated children admitted to the interdisciplinary 14-bed PICU of the University Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. The nurse in charge and an independent observer simultaneously assessed the patients using German versions of the BPS, the COMFORT-B scale (CBS), and the modified Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (mFLACC) scale immediately before and during endotracheal suctioning.

RESULTS

We analyzed 170 parallel assessments in n=34 ventilated children. Patients were (mean ± SD) 9.5 ± 4.8 years old. Internal consistency for the BPS was excellent (α=0.93). We found a high rater agreement for all clinical scales (BPS: k=0.73, CBS: k=0.80, mFLACC: k=0.71). Strong correlations were identified between BPS and CBS (r=0.89) and BPS and mFLACC (r=0.79). The BPS cutoff values showed likewise excellent results (area under the curve CBS >16: 0.97; mFLACC >2: 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

In our population of ventilated children, the BPS was well suited to detect procedural pain-related distress compared with two validated pain scales. Further extensive validation studies should follow to support our findings.

2022 Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines on Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients With Consideration of the ICU Environment and Early Mobility

RATIONALE

A guideline that both evaluates current practice and provides recommendations to address sedation, pain, and delirium management with regard for neuromuscular blockade and withdrawal is not currently available.

OBJECTIVE

To develop comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for critically ill infants and children, with specific attention to seven domains of care including pain, sedation/agitation, iatrogenic withdrawal, neuromuscular blockade, delirium, PICU environment, and early mobility.

DESIGN

The Society of Critical Care Medicine Pediatric Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in critically ill pediatric patients with consideration of the PICU Environment and Early Mobility Guideline Taskforce was comprised of 29 national experts who collaborated from 2009 to 2021 via teleconference and/or e-mail at least monthly for planning, literature review, and guideline development, revision, and approval. The full taskforce gathered annually in-person during the Society of Critical Care Medicine Congress for progress reports and further strategizing with the final face-to-face meeting occurring in February 2020. Throughout this process, the Society of Critical Care Medicine standard operating procedures Manual for Guidelines development was adhered to.

METHODS

Taskforce content experts separated into subgroups addressing pain/analgesia, sedation, tolerance/iatrogenic withdrawal, neuromuscular blockade, delirium, PICU environment (family presence and sleep hygiene), and early mobility. Subgroups created descriptive and actionable Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome questions. An experienced medical information specialist developed search strategies to identify relevant literature between January 1990 and January 2020. Subgroups reviewed literature, determined quality of evidence, and formulated recommendations classified as "strong" with "we recommend" or "conditional" with "we suggest." Good practice statements were used when indirect evidence supported benefit with no or minimal risk. Evidence gaps were noted. Initial recommendations were reviewed by each subgroup and revised as deemed necessary prior to being disseminated for voting by the full taskforce. Individuals who had an overt or potential conflict of interest abstained from relevant votes. Expert opinion alone was not used in substitution for a lack of evidence.

RESULTS

The Pediatric Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in critically ill pediatric patients with consideration of the PICU Environment and Early Mobility taskforce issued 44 recommendations (14 strong and 30 conditional) and five good practice statements.

CONCLUSIONS

The current guidelines represent a comprehensive list of practical clinical recommendations for the assessment, prevention, and management of key aspects for the comprehensive critical care of infants and children. Main areas of focus included 1) need for the routine monitoring of pain, agitation, withdrawal, and delirium using validated tools, 2) enhanced use of protocolized sedation and analgesia, and 3) recognition of the importance of nonpharmacologic interventions for enhancing patient comfort and comprehensive care provision.

Endotracheal suction interventions in mechanically ventilated children: An integrative review to inform evidence-based practice

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to review and critically appraise the evidence for paediatric endotracheal suction interventions.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search for studies was undertaken in the electronic databases CENTRAL, Medline, EMBASE, and EBSCO CINAHL from 2003.

STUDY SELECTION

Included studies assessed suction interventions in children (≤18 ys old) receiving mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome was defined a priori as duration of mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and measures of gas exchange and lung mechanics.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Study methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool for randomised trials or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Overall assessment of the certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria.

RESULTS

Overall 17 studies involving 1618 children and more than 21,834 suction episodes were included in the review. The most common intervention theme was suction system (five studies; 29%). All included trials were at unclear or high risk of performance bias due to the inability to blind interventionists. Current evidence suggests that closed suction may maintain arterial saturations, normal saline leads to significant transient desaturation, and lung recruitment applied after suction offers short-term oxygenation benefit.

LIMITATIONS

Lack of randomised controlled trials, inconsistencies in populations and interventions across studies, and imprecision and risk of bias in included studies precluded data pooling to provide an estimate of interventions effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of this integrative review, there is insufficient high-quality evidence to guide practice around suction interventions in mechanically ventilated children.

The Effects of Endotracheal Suctioning in the Pediatric Population: An Integrative Review

BACKGROUND

Critically ill pediatric patients with endotracheal tubes routinely receive endotracheal tube suctioning to clear secretions and ensure tube patency. This common practice can result in adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the research literature on the stressors of endotracheal suctioning and consequent effect on the pediatric patient.

METHODS

An integrative review was conducted using the Whittemore and Knafl modified framework for integrative reviews, and article selection was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses flow diagram. A literature search was conducted via PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Scopus. Selected articles were evaluated to present the current evidence on the stressors of endotracheal suctioning in the pediatric population.

RESULTS

This review includes 14 articles, with a total of 849 patients, ranging in age from premature neonates to 17 years of age. The available literature aligned into 3 categories: neurovascular effects, respiratory systems effects, and pain related to endotracheal tube suctioning. Pain was the most prevalent category, with half of the studies using endotracheal suctioning as a painful procedure to validate pain assessment tools rather than examining the effect of suctioning. A majority of the studies (67%) were conducted in the premature neonate population. Children with congenital cardiac or pulmonary defects, genetic syndromes, or neurological injuries were frequently excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

Literature regarding the effects of endotracheal suctioning in children is limited. There are many extrapersonal, interpersonal, and intrapersonal stressors associated with endotracheal suctioning that merit future research.

How often do we perform painful and stressful procedures in the paediatric intensive care unit? A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Adequate analgesia and sedation is crucial in critical care. There is little knowledge on the extent of painful and stressful procedures on children admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and its analgesic and/or sedative management.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to determine the number of painful and stressful procedures per patient per day in our PICU patients, including the numbers of attempts. A secondary objective was to map PICU nurses' perceptions of the painfulness of the included procedures.

METHODS

A prospective, single-centre observational cohort study in a tertiary PICU. All patients admitted to the PICU over a 3-month period were eligible. Readmissions, polysomnography patients, and patients without any data have been excluded. The number of painful and stressful procedures was collected daily, and use of analgesics and sedatives was assessed and recorded daily. Twenty-five randomly assigned nurses rated the painfulness of procedures based on their personal experience using a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10.

RESULTS

In a 3-month period, a total of 229 patients were included, accounting for 855 patient days. The median number of painful and stressful procedures per patient per day was 11 (interquartile range=5-23). Endotracheal suctioning was the most frequent procedure (45%), followed by oral and nasal suctioning. Arterial and lumbar puncture, peripheral IV cannula insertion, and venipuncture were scored as most painful ranging from 3 to 10. Procedural analgesia or sedation was often not used during these most painful procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanically ventilated patients undergo more than twice as many painful procedures than non-ventilated patients, as endotracheal suctioning accounts for almost half of all. Nurses regarded skin-breaking procedures most painful; however, these were rarely treated by procedural analgosedation and only covered in the minority of cases by adequate background analgosedation.

Pain assessment during blood collection from sedated and mechanically ventilated children

Objective

This study assessed pain and observed physiological parameters in sedated and mechanically ventilated children during a routine procedure.

Methods

This observational study was performed in a pediatric intensive care unit. Thirty-five children between 1 month and 12 years of age were assessed before, during, and five minutes after an arterial blood collection for gas analysis (painful procedure). Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability scale was used to assess pain. In addition, patients' heart rate, respiratory rate, peripheral saturation of oxygen and blood pressure (diastolic and systolic) were recorded. COMFORT-B scale was applied before the pain and physiological parameter assessments to verify sedation level of the subjects.

Results

There was an increase in Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability score (p = 0.0001) during painful stimuli. There was an increase in heart rate (p = 0.03), respiratory rate (p = 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.006) due to pain caused by the routine procedure.

Conclusions

This study suggests that assessments of pain using standard scales, such as Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability score, and other physiological parameters should be consistently executed to optimize pain management in pediatric intensive care units.