High blood pressure at entry into antenatal care and birth outcomes among a cohort of HIV-uninfected women and women living with HIV initiating antiretroviral therapy in South Africa

Perinatal outcomes in women with lower-range elevated blood pressure and stage 1 hypertension: insights from the Kaya health and demographic surveillance system, Burkina Faso

BACKGROUND

The impact of lower thresholds for elevated blood pressure (BP) on adverse perinatal outcomes has been poorly explored in sub-Saharan African populations. We aimed to explore the association between lower BP cutoffs (according to the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association [ACC/AHA] criteria) and adverse perinatal outcomes in Kaya, Burkina Faso.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 2,232 women with singleton pregnancies between February and September 2021. BP was categorized according to the ACC/AHA criteria and applied throughout pregnancy. A multivariable Poisson regression model based on Generalized Estimating Equation with robust standard errors was used to evaluate the association between elevated BP, stage 1 hypertension, and adverse perinatal outcomes, controlling for maternal sociodemographic characteristics, parity, and the number of antenatal consultations, and the results were presented as adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Of the 2,232 women, 1000 (44.8%) were normotensive, 334 (14.9%) had elevated BP, 759 (34.0%) had stage 1 hypertension, and 139 (6.2%) had stage 2 hypertension. There was no significant association between elevated BP and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Compared to normotensive women, women with elevated BP had a 2.05-fold increased risk of delivery via caesarean section (aRR;2.05, 95%CI; 1.08-3.92), while those with stage 1 hypertension had a 1.41-fold increased risk of having low birth weight babies (aRR; 1.41, 95%CI; 1.06-1.86), and a 1.32-fold increased risk of having any maternal or neonatal adverse outcome (aRR; 1.32, 95%CI; 1.02-1.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes is not increased with elevated BP. Proactive identification of pregnant women with stage 1 hypertension in Burkina Faso can improve hypertension management through enhanced clinical surveillance.

Associations of HIV and antiretroviral therapy with gestational diabetes in South Africa

OBJECTIVE

To estimate associations of HIV status and antiretroviral (ART) regimen with gestational diabetes (GDM) and postpartum glucose metabolism.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

METHODS

We enrolled pregnant persons with HIV (PWH) and without HIV in Cape Town, South Africa who were at least 18 years of age at 24-28 weeks' gestation and followed up to 26 months postpartum. Participants were tested for GDM in pregnancy and for diabetes postpartum using a 75 g 2 h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and diagnosed via WHO criteria. We estimated associations of HIV status and ART regime [efavirenz (EFV) versus dolutegravir (DTG)] with GDM and postpartum impaired glucose metabolism using multivariable log binomial or linear regression models.

RESULTS

Among 397 participants [median age 30 (interquartile range (IQR) 25-34; n  = 198 without HIV, n  = 199 PWH], the prevalence of GDM was 6% (9 PWH versus 3% without HIV). In multivariable analyses, PWH were at higher risk of GDM [risk ratio (RR) 3.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-10.7] after adjustment for prepregnancy BMI and other confounders. GDM risk did not differ by ART regimen (unadjusted prevalence 8.1% DTG versus 5.6% EFV, adjusted RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.2-6.6). Few participants had diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), or impaired fasting glucose postpartum ( n  = 13, 6%) with no differences by HIV or ART status.

CONCLUSION

In a setting of universal GDM testing, PWH had an increased risk of impaired glucose metabolism during pregnancy but not postpartum. Among PWH, GDM risk was similar regardless of EFV or DTG use. Given concerns about DTG and weight gain, diabetes risk should continue to be monitored.

Blood pressure thresholds in pregnancy for identifying maternal and infant risk: a secondary analysis of Community-Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) trial data

Background

Blood pressure measurement is a marker of antenatal care quality. In well resourced settings, lower blood pressure cutoffs for hypertension are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. We aimed to study the associations between blood pressure thresholds and adverse outcomes and the diagnostic test properties of these blood pressure cutoffs in low-resource settings.

Methods

We did a secondary analysis of data from 22 intervention clusters in the Community-Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) cluster randomised trials (NCT01911494) in India (n=6), Mozambique (n=6), and Pakistan (n=10). We included pregnant women aged 15–49 years (12–49 years in Mozambique), identified in their community by trained community health workers, who had data on blood pressure measurements and outcomes. The trial was unmasked. Maximum blood pressure was categorised as: normal blood pressure (systolic blood pressure [sBP] <120 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure [dBP] <80 mm Hg), elevated blood pressure (sBP 120–129 mm Hg and dBP <80 mm Hg), stage 1 hypertension (sBP 130–139 mm Hg or dBP 80–89 mm Hg, or both), non-severe stage 2 hypertension (sBP 140–159 mm Hg or dBP 90–109 mm Hg, or both), or severe stage 2 hypertension (sBP ≥160 mm Hg or dBP ≥110 mm Hg, or both). We classified women according to the maximum blood pressure category reached across all visits for the primary analyses. The primary outcome was a maternal, fetal, or neonatal mortality or morbidity composite. We estimated dose-response relationships between blood pressure category and adverse outcomes, as well as diagnostic test properties.

Findings

Between Nov 1, 2014, and Feb 28, 2017, 21 069 women (6067 in India, 4163 in Mozambique, and 10 839 in Pakistan) contributed 103 679 blood pressure measurements across the three CLIP trials. Only women with non-severe or severe stage 2 hypertension, as discrete diagnostic categories, experienced more adverse outcomes than women with normal blood pressure (risk ratios 1·29–5·88). Using blood pressure categories as diagnostic thresholds (women with blood pressure within the category or any higher category vs those with blood pressure in any lower category), dose-response relationships were observed between increasing thresholds and adverse outcomes, but likelihood ratios were informative only for severe stage 2 hypertension and maternal CNS events (likelihood ratio 6·36 [95% CI 3·65–11·07]) and perinatal death (5·07 [3·64–7·07]), particularly stillbirth (8·53 [5·63–12·92]).

Interpretation

In low-resource settings, neither elevated blood pressure nor stage 1 hypertension were associated with maternal, fetal, or neonatal mortality or morbidity adverse composite outcomes. Only the threshold for severe stage 2 hypertension met diagnostic test performance standards. Current diagnostic thresholds for hypertension in pregnancy should be retained.

Funding

University of British Columbia, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.