Synergism between cysteinyl leukotrienes and thromboxane A2 to induce allergic late phase nasal blockage in guinea pigs

Prophylactic effects of the histamine H1 receptor antagonist epinastine and the dual thromboxane A2 receptor and chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells antagonist ramatroban on allergic rhinitis model in mice

The prophylactic use of anti-allergic drugs has been proposed to be effective in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis in humans. However, there is little information regarding the prophylactic effect of thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) receptor antagonist on allergic rhinitis. Recent studies revealed that a TXA(2) receptor antagonist ramatroban could block the prostaglandin D(2) (PGD(2)) receptor and chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTH2). In the present study, we investigated the prophylactic effects of the histamine H(1) receptor antagonist epinastine and the TXA(2) receptor antagonist ramatroban and seratrodast on mouse models of allergic rhinitis. Female BALB/c mice were sensitized by an intraperitoneal injection of ovalbumin and alum on days 0, 5, 14 and 21. Seven days later, mice were sensitized by intranasal application of ovalbumin thrice a week. Drugs were administered once a day from day 22. The severity of allergic rhinitis was assessed by determining the extent of 2 nasal allergic symptoms (sneezing and nasal rubbing). Histamine sensitivity and eosinophil infiltration into the nasal mucosa were also determined. Epinastine and ramatroban significantly reduced nasal symptoms and the number of eosinophils in the nasal mucosa. Seratrodast showed no effect on nasal symptoms and eosinophil infiltration into the nasal mucosa. In addition, histamine sensitivity was reduced by epinastine and ramatroban. These results indicate that epinastine and ramatroban induce the prophylactic effect on allergic rhinitis.

Inhibition of hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase improves allergic nasal blockage in guinea pigs

Although it has been suggested that prostaglandin (PG) D(2) is involved in the pathogenesis of allergic rhinitis, whether the inhibition of hematopoietic PGD(2) synthase (H-PGDS) shows beneficial effects on allergic rhinitis has been unclear. We evaluated the effects of a selective H-PGDS inhibitor, TFC-007, on nasal symptoms on Japanese cedar pollen-induced allergic rhinitis of guinea pigs. Sensitized animals were challenged with the pollen once a week. TFC-007 (30mg/kg, p.o.) given once before a challenge almost completely suppressed PGD(2) production in the nasal tissue early and late after the challenge. Although pre-treatment did not affect the incidences of sneezing and early phase nasal blockage, late phase nasal blockage was partially but significantly attenuated; however, nasal eosinophilia was not suppressed. In contrast, when TFC-007 was given once 1.5h after the challenge, the late phase response was not affected. Collectively, PGD(2) produced by H-PGDS early after an antigen challenge can participate in the induction of late phase nasal blockage, although the mechanism may be independent of eosinophil infilatration. The strategy for H-PGDS inhibition may be beneficial for allergic rhinitis therapy.

Absence of nasal blockage in a Japanese cedar pollen-induced allergic rhinitis model mouse

BACKGROUND

Japanese cedar pollen-induced allergic rhinitis in a guinea pig model clearly induced not only sneezing but also biphasic nasal blockage. To date, there have only been a few reports on models of murine allergic rhinitis which clearly show nasal blockage. Therefore, in order to try and develop such a model, we administered multiple dosages of intranasal pollen or purified antigen protein Cry j 1.

METHODS

B10.S mice were sensitized by intranasal instillations of either pollen extract or Cry j 1 twice a day for 7 days, which was adsorbed on Al(OH)(3). Subsequently, once a week, the mice were given multiple intranasal instillation challenges of either the pollen suspension or Cry j 1 and the frequency of sneezing was observed after respective challenges were made. Specific airway resistance (sRaw) was measured as an indicator for nasal blockage. Cry j 1-specific IgE levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

The serum Cry j 1-specific IgE level showed clear elevation only in the group sensitized by Cry j 1 + Al(OH)(3) and then challenged by Cry j 1. No elevations were seen in the groups sensitized by pollen extract + Al(OH)(3) followed by a pollen suspension challenge. There was an immediate increase in sneezing after challenges in all of the sensitized-challenged groups. Nevertheless, no increases in sRaw in any of the groups were detected at any of the time points during the 8 hours following the challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

Cry j 1 may be more effective than crude antigens for efficient sensitization/challenge in mice. No increase in sRaw occurred, even in mice that possessed high amounts of Cry j 1-specific IgE and that exhibited sneezing.

Induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase and apoptosis by LPS and TNF-alpha in nasal microvascular endothelial cells

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the co-administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) (LPS/TNF-alpha) can induce the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), which results in the generation of apoptosis in cultured human nasal microvascular endothelial cells (HNMECs). Since LPS and TNF-alpha have been suggested to play an important role in the pathophysiology of nasal disease, we conclude that microvascular leakage may therefore contribute to the inflammatory process in nasal disease, such as allergic rhinitis and asthma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The HNMECs were obtained from the inferior turbinate and subsequently cultured. The expression of iNOS induced by both the LPS and TNF-alpha was investigated by fluorescent immunohistochemistry, using confocal laser microscopy. The DNA-binding dye, Hoechist 33342, was also used to analyze the apoptosis in the HNMECs.

RESULTS

The fluorescent immunohistochemistory study demonstrated that LPS and TNF-alpha induced the expression of iNOS in HNMECs. LPS/TNF-alpha remarkably augmented the expression of iNOS in HNMECs in comparison to stimulation by either LPS or TNF-alpha alone. LPS/TNF-alpha also induced apoptosis in HNMECs. 1400W, a highly selective inhibitor of iNOS, inhibited both the expression of iNOS and the apoptosis induced by LPS/TNF-alpha.

Participation in cysteinyl leukotrienes and thromboxane A2 in nasal congestion model in Brown Norway rats

The aim of this study was to investigate the involvement of chemical mediators in a nasal congestion model in Brown Norway (BN) rats. For the above purpose, we studied the effects of pranlukast and zafirlukast (cysteinyl leukotriene (cys-LT) receptor antagonists), seratrodast and ramatroban (thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) receptor antagonists) on nasal congestion and sneezing induced by toluene 2, 4-diisocyanate (TDI). All of these drugs suppressed the increase of enhanced pause (Penh), the index of nasal congestion, in both early and late phase responses; however, pranlukast, zafirlukast and seratrodast failed to suppress immediate sneezing caused by TDI challenge. These results indicate that cys-LTs and TXA(2) are responsible for the development of both early and late phase nasal congestion. Moreover, these chemical mediators contribute very little to immediate sneezing in a BN rat model of allergic rhinitis.

Different mechanisms between thromboxane A2- and leukotriene D4-induced nasal blockage in guinea pigs

Although thromboxane (TX)A2 is involved in allergic rhinitis, the mechanisms inducing nasal blockage have not been elucidated. We evaluated the roles of nasal mucosal vascular changes following intranasal instillation of the TXA2 analog U-46619 or leukotriene (LT)D4 to induce nasal blockage in a guinea pig model of allergic rhinitis. Both U-46619- and LTD4-induced nasal blockages in sensitized animals were swiftly and completely suppressed by a vasoconstrictor, naphazoline. The nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N(omega)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester relieved LTD4-induced nasal blockage, but not U-46619-induced nasal blockage. Although both agonists produced vasodilatation of nasal mucosa in vivo, LTD4 caused vasodilatation while U-46619 caused vasoconstriction in vitro. Both LTD4- and U-46619-induced nasal blockages in vivo should depend on vasodilatation of nasal mucosa. LTD4-induced nasal blockage is induced by direct vasodilatation via nitric oxide. In contrast, U-46619-induced nasal blockage may be associated with contraction of a certain vein that should exist at the exit of capacitance vessels, leading to congestion of the nasal mucosa.