Trends in Radiation Fractionation for Bone Metastases: A Contemporary Nationwide Analysis

Comparison of pain-relieving effects by number of irradiations, through propensity score matching and the international consensus endpoint

Background

Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases utilizes various dose fractionation schedules. The pain-relieving effects of a single fraction (SF) and multiple fractions (MF) are largely debated due to the difficulty in matching patients' backgrounds and in assessing the effectiveness of pain relief. This study aimed to compare the pain-relieving effects of SF and MF palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases using propensity score matching and the international consensus endpoint (ICE).

Materials and methods

Our study included 195 patients irradiated for bone metastasis. The primary endpoint was the pain-relieving effects used by ICE. In addition, the evaluation was performed by using responder (complete response/partial response) and non-responder (pain progression/indeterminate response) categorization. The secondary endpoints were the discharge or transfer rate at one month after irradiation and postirradiation pathological fracture rate. Propensity score matching was used to adjust patient's characteristics and reduce selection bias.

Results

After adapting propensity score matching, the total number of patients was 74. There was no significant difference in the pain-relieving effects between SF and MF (p = 0.184). There were no significant differences in them between SF and MF when using responder and non-responder categorization (p = 0.163). Furthermore, there were no differences in the discharge or transfer rates (p = 0.693) and pathological fracture rates (p = 1.00).

Conclusions

The combination of propensity score matching and ICE revealed no significant difference in the pain-relieving effects between SF and MF for bone metastases, thus, SF has no significant disadvantage compared to MF in pain-relieving effects.

Factors affecting local control of bone metastases from radioresistant tumors treated with palliative external beam radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the factors that affect the local control (LC) of bone metastases from radioresistant carcinomas (renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC], and colorectal carcinoma [CRC]) treated with palliative external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 2010 and December 2020, 211 bone metastases in 134 patients were treated with EBRT in two hospitals (a cancer center and university hospital). Based on follow-up CT, these cases were reviewed retrospectively to evaluate LC at the EBRT site.

RESULTS

The median EBRT dose (BED10) was 39.0 Gy (range, 14.4-66.3 Gy). The median follow-up time of the imaging studies was 6 months (range, 1-107 months). The 0.5-year overall survival and LC rates of the EBRT sites were 73% and 73%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the primary sites (HCC/CRC), low EBRT dose (BED10) (≤ 39.0 Gy), and non-administration of post-EBRT bone modifying agents (BMAs) and/or antineoplastic agents (ATs) were statistically significant factors that negatively affected the LC of EBRT sites. In the absence of BMAs or ATs, the EBRT dose (BED10) escalation from 39.0 Gy improved the LC of EBRT sites. Based on ATs administration, the LC of EBRT sites was significantly affected by tyrosine kinase inhibitors and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose escalation improves LC in bone metastases from radioresistant carcinomas. Higher EBRT doses are needed to treat patients for whom few effective systemic therapies remain available.

Utilization Patterns of Single-Fraction and Short-Course Radiotherapeutic Schedules in the Management of Bone Metastases

Purpose

Bone metastases are common, occurring in 60% to 70% of patients with advanced malignancies. Historically, bone-directed radiation therapy regimens of 30 Gy over 10 fractions were used. However, prospective randomized data suggest equivalent pain relief with shorter-course regimens. The American Society for Radiation Oncology Choosing Wisely Campaign encourages clinicians to consider shorter-course palliative regimens in patients with limited prognosis. A retrospective analysis was performed to assess patterns of short-course and single-fraction radiation therapy during the past 5 years.

Methods and Materials

We queried our electronic medical record (MOSAIQ) from 2016 to 2020 for patients with bone metastases who received palliative radiation therapy. Patients receiving >10 fractions or Medicare-approved palliative courses of radiation (30 Gy/10 fractions, 24 Gy/6 fractions, 20 Gy/5 fractions, 8 Gy/1 fraction) were included. Treatment department was defined as academic (n = 2) versus community (n = 12). Short-course treatment was defined as <6 fractions, whereas long-course included patients receiving >10 fractions. Patients were subdivided based on age and disease site. Physicians were grouped according to their year of residency completion. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified predictors of short-course and single-fraction treatment.

Results

We identified 1004 patients with 1768 bony metastases meeting inclusion criteria. The spine was the most common site, followed by pelvis/hip, extremity, and other site. Use of short-course treatment increased from 40% in 2016 to 50% in 2020. Single-fraction treatment increased from 7% in 2016 to 11% in 2020. Predictors of shorter courses included treatment at academic centers, more recent treatment, patient age >76 years, and nonspine anatomic site. Predictors of single-fraction treatment included treatment at academic centers, treating physician residency completion after 2010, patient age >76 years, and treatment to extremity or other site.

Conclusions

Rates of short-course and single-fraction bone-directed radiation therapy increased within our health system over time. Treatment receipt at academic centers was associated with both short-course and single-fraction regimens. Physicians completing residency after 2010 were more likely to deliver single-fraction therapy.

Trends in Radiation Oncology Treatment Fractionation at a Single Academic Center, 2010-2020

Purpose

Recent clinical trials suggest hypofractionated treatment regimens are appropriate for treatment of many cancers. It is important to understand and document hypofractionation adoption because of its implications for treatment center patient volumes. There is no recent U.S. study of trends in hypofractionation adoption that includes comparisons of multiple disease sites and data since the onset of COVID-19. In this context, this study describes trends in treatment fractionation at a single academic center from 2010 to 2020.

Methods and Materials

From an institutional database, records were extracted for treatment of 4 disease site categories: all cancers, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and bone metastases. For each disease site, the mean number of fractions per treatment course was reported for each year of the study period. To explore whether the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased hypofractionation adoption, piecewise linear regression models were used to estimate a changepoint in the time trend of mean monthly number of fractions per treatment course and to evaluate whether this changepoint coincided with pandemic onset.

Results

The data set included 22,865 courses of radiation treatment and 375,446 treatment fractions. The mean number of fractions per treatment course for all cancers declined from 17.5 in 2010 to 13.6 in 2020. There was increased adoption of hypofractionation at this institution for all cancers and specifically for both breast and prostate cancer. For bone metastases, hypofractionation had largely been adopted before the study period. For most disease sites, adoption of hypofractionated treatment courses occurred before pandemic onset. Bone metastases was the only disease site where a pandemic-driven increase in hypofractionation adoption could not be ruled out.

Conclusions

This study reveals increasing use of hypofractionated regimens for a variety of cancers throughout the study period, which largely occurred before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic at this institution.

The Palliative Care in the Metastatic Spinal Tumors. A Systematic Review on the Radiotherapy and Surgical Perspective

Spine represents the most common site for metastatic disease involvement. Due to the close relationship between the spinal cord and critical structures, therapeutical management of metastatic spinal cord disease remains challenging. Spinal localization can lead to neurological sequelae, which can significantly affect the quality of life in patients with a limited life expectancy. The authors conducted a systematic literature review according to PRISMA guidelines in order to determine the impact of the most updated palliative care on spinal metastases. The initial literature search retrieved 2526 articles, manually screened based on detailed exclusion criteria. Finally, 65 studies met the inclusion criteria and were finally included in the systematic review. In the wide scenario of palliative care, nowadays, recent medical or surgical treatments represent valuable options for ameliorating pain and improving patients QoL in such this condition.

Geographical distance and reduced access to palliative radiotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) is an effective way of reducing symptoms caused by advanced incurable cancer. Several studies have investigated factors that contribute to inequalities in access to PRT; distance to a radiotherapy centre has been identified as one potential barrier.

AIM

To assess whether there is an association between distance to a radiotherapy centre and utilisation rates of PRT in adults with cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42020190772). MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and APA-PsycINFO were searched for relevant papers up to 28 February 2021.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were included. Twelve studies focused on whether patients with incurable cancer received PRT, as part of their treatment package. Pooled results reported that living ≥50 km vs <50 km from the radiotherapy centre was associated with a reduced likelihood of receiving PRT (OR 0.84 (95%CI 0.80, 0.88)). Nine focused on distance from the radiotherapy centre and compared single-fraction (SF) versus multiple-fraction PRT, indicating that patients living further away were more likely to receive SF. Pooled results comparing ≥50 km versus <50 km showed increased odds of receiving SF for those living ≥50 km (OR 1.48 (95%CI 1.26,1.75)).

CONCLUSION

Patients living further away from radiotherapy centres were less likely to receive PRT and those who received PRT were more likely to receive SF PRT, providing some evidence of inequalities in access to PRT treatment based on proximity to centres providing radiotherapy. Further research is needed to understand whether these inequalities are influenced by clinical referral patterns or by patients unwilling or unable to travel longer distances.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020190772.

Contemporary Practice Patterns for Palliative Radiation Therapy of Bone Metastases: Impact of a Quality Improvement Project on Extended Fractionation

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy effectively palliates bone metastases, although variability exists in practice patterns. National recommendations advocate against using extended fractionation (EF) with courses greater than 10 fractions. We previously reported EF use of 14.8%. We analyzed practice patterns within a statewide quality consortium to assess EF use in a larger patient population after implementation of a quality measure focused on reducing EF.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients treated for bone metastases within a statewide radiation oncology quality consortium were prospectively enrolled from March 2018 through October 2020. The EF quality metric was implemented March 1, 2018. Data on patient, physician, and facility characteristics; fractionation schedules; and treatment planning and delivery techniques were collected. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to assess EF.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight facilities enrolled 1445 consecutive patients treated with 1934 plans. The median number of treatment plans per facility was 52 (range, 7-307). Sixty different fractionation schedules were used. EF was delivered in 3.4% of plans. Initially, EF use was lower than expected and remained low over time. Significant predictors for EF use included complicated metastasis (odds ratio [OR], 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-4.02; P = .04), lack of associated central nervous system or visceral disease (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.2-4.2; P = .01), nonteaching versus teaching facilities (OR, 8.97; 95% CI, 2.1-38.5; P < .01), and treating physicians with more years in practice (OR, 12.82; 95% CI, 3.9-42.4; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Within a large, prospective population-based data set, fractionation schedules for palliative radiation therapy of bone metastases remain highly variable. Resource-intensive treatments including EF persist, although EF use was low after implementation of a quality measure. Complicated metastases, lack of central nervous system or visceral disease, and treatment at nonteaching facilities or by physicians with more years in practice significantly predict use of EF. These results support ongoing efforts to more clearly understand and address barriers to high-value radiation approaches in the palliative setting.

National Quality Measure Compliance for Palliative Bone Radiation Among Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

There exists wide practice variability in palliative treatment schedules for bone metastases. In an effort to reduce variation and promote high-quality, cost-conscious care, the National Quality Forum (NQF) endorsed measure 1822 in 2012. This measure recommends the use of 30 Gy in 10 fractions, 24 Gy in 6 fractions, 20 Gy in 5 fractions, or 8 Gy in a single fraction for palliative radiation for bone metastases. We report on longitudinal compliance with this measure.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, patients with metastatic thoracic non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 who received radiation therapy for bony sites of metastatic disease were identified. Treatment courses fitting 1 of the 4 recommended schedules under NQF 1822 were coded as compliant. Rates of compliance by patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 42,685 patients met the criteria for inclusion. Among all patients, 60.2% of treatment courses were compliant according to NQF 1822. Compliance increased over time and was highest for treatments to the extremity (69.8%), lowest for treatments to the skull or head (48.8%), and higher for academic practice (67.1%) compared with community (56.0%) or integrated network facilities (61.2%). On multivariable analysis, predictors of NQF 1822 compliance included year of diagnosis after 2011, treatment to an extremity, or treatment at an academic facility. Of noncompliant treatment courses, extended fractionation (≥11 fractions) occurred in 62.6% and was more common before 2012, in community practice, and for treatments of the skull or head.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients treated for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, compliance with NQF 1822 increased over time. Although extended fractionation constituted a majority of noncompliant treatment courses, a substantial proportion also involved shorter courses.