Socio-demographic factors and long-term use of benzodiazepines in patients with depression, anxiety or insomnia

The association of benzodiazepine and benzodiazepine-related drugs with outcomes after surgery for colorectal cancer

Benzodiazepines increase plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) level which, in turn, may improve survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This study aimed to evaluate the associations between benzodiazepine and benzodiazepine-related drugs (BZRD) use and outcomes of patients operated for CRC. This is a retrospective cohort study including patients operated for CRC at Limoges' University Hospital between 2010 and 2019. Data were collected from two sources: medical records of patients in the digestive, general and endocrine surgery department at Limoges University Hospital and from the Haute-Vienne general cancer registry. Patients were divided into benzodiazepine users and non-users. Outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Among 504 patients who underwent surgery for CRC, 125 (24.8%) patients were treated with benzodiazepine/BZRD drugs. Users and non-users of benzodiazepine/BZRD showed no statistically significant differences in 5-year OS (45.5 ± 1.9% vs. 46.5 ± 1.1% p = 0.25) and 5-year RFS (41.0 ± 2.1% vs. 39.6 ± 1.3%, p = 0.94), even after adjustment for confounders and propensity score (OS: aHR=1.02, 95%CI: 0.71-1.48; RFS: aHR=1.00, 95%CI: 0.72-1.40). Subgroup analysis on CRC patients with psychiatric disorders revealed that benzodiazepine users had better RFS (aHR=0.58, 95%CI: 0.35-0.96) compared with non-users, particularly, patients with stages III or IV of CRC had better OS (aHR=0.27; 95%CI: 0.12-0.59) and RFS (aHR=0.30, 95%CI: 0.15-0.62). OS and RFS was significantly better in patients taking benzodiazepines classified as anxiolytics, having longer half-life, and producing active metabolites. In conclusion, benzodiazepine use was not associated with outcomes in CRC patients. Nevertheless, in subgroup of patients with psychiatric disorders and advanced CRC stage, benzodiazepine could improve survival.

Impact of a publicly-funded pharmacare program policy on benzodiazepine dispensing among children and youth: a population-based natural experiment

BACKGROUND

In January 2018, the Government of Ontario, Canada, initiated a universal pharmacare program (OHIP+) for all individuals aged 24 years and younger. In April 2019, the program was amended to cover only children and youth without private insurance. Because benzodiazepines are commonly prescribed to children and youth despite their potential hazards, we examined whether changes in publicly-funded drug coverage influenced benzodiazepine dispensing trends in this demographic.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based natural experiment study of benzodiazepine dispensing to children and youth in Ontario between January 2013 and March 2020. We used interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models to estimate the impact of OHIP + and its subsequent modification on these trends.

RESULTS

The implementation of OHIP + was associated with an immediate increase in the monthly rate of benzodiazepine dispensing of 12.9 individuals per 100,000 population (95% confidence interval [CI]; 7.5 to 18.3 per 100,000). Benzodiazepine dispensing rates rose from 214.2 to 241.5 per 100,000 from December 2017 to March 2019, a 12.8% (95% CI 9.6-16.0%) increase. In stratified analyses, increases were most pronounced among females, children and youth living in the lowest income neighbourhoods and individuals aged 20 to 24. The April 2019 modification to OHIP + was not associated with changes in monthly benzodiazepine dispensing trends (0.39 individuals per 100,000; 95% CI -1.3 to 2.1 per 100,000). However, rates remained elevated relative to the period preceding OHIP + implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a publicly-funded pharmacare program resulted in more children and youth being prescribed benzodiazepines.

Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Women's Satisfaction with Their Sexual Life and Its Relationship with the Use of Psychotropic Drugs: A Cross-Sectional Study

Sexual satisfaction (SS) is defined as an affective response arising from one’s subjective evaluation of the positive and negative dimensions associated with one’s sexual relationship. It is an important indicator of health. In women, SS has an important personal component consisting of the physical experiences of pleasure and the positive feelings and emotions that they experience in their affective-sexual relationships. The socioeconomic position is determined by income, educational level, and work, and it conditions women’s sexual health. We aimed to assess whether social determinants of health (income, education, work, and gender) are associated with women’s sexual satisfaction and to identify whether the impact of social determinants on sexual satisfaction differs with psychotropic consumption. We conducted a cross-sectional study designed to assess the association between variables related to the social determinants of health (work, education, income, and gender) and sexual satisfaction in women of reproductive age in La Rioja (Spain). The women in this study ranged in age from 17 to 52 years, with a mean age of 33.4 (Standar Deviation 8.6). Most were Spanish (82.9%), had undertaken non-compulsory specialized education (84%), and worked (72.7%). Regarding their relationships, 87% maintained monogamous relationships, 84.5% had stable relationships, and 65.7% lived with their partners. In total, 12.3% of the women were taking psychotropic drugs prescribed for the treatment of anxiety and/or depression. We observed that SS is significantly lower among women who have only undertaken compulsory education (Student-t = −4.745; p < 0.01), in those who have unstable affective-sexual relationships (Student-t = −2.553; p < 0.01), and in those who take psychotropic drugs (Student-t = −4.180, p < 0.01). We conclude that the social determinants of health such as education, not continuing to study beyond compulsory education, gender, and taking psychoactive drugs have a significant impact on women’s degree of satisfaction with their sexual life.

Change in the regulatory framework for zolpidem: What is the impact on the landscape of the prescription of sedative medications? The French national ZORRO study

AIMS

In recent years, zolpidem has been the subject of numerous reports of misuse, abuse and dependence. In view of these risks, the French drug agency (ANSM) decreed in April 2017 the implementation of secure prescription pads. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of this regulatory measure on the prescription of zolpidem and other sedative medications (zopiclone, benzodiazepines and antihistamines) in long-term users of zolpidem and associated factors.

METHODS

We performed a historical cohort study using data from the Generalist Sample of Beneficiaries (EGB). All patients aged over 18 years old who were long-term users (at least 3 months) before the measure were enacted. We analysed the reimbursement trajectories of zolpidem, zopiclone, benzodiazepines and antihistamines (hydroxyzine and alimemazine) up to 2 years after the measure using a state sequence analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 2502 patients were analysed. A four-cluster typology was identified: continuation of zolpidem (n = 1044, 42%), discontinuation of sedative medications (n = 766, 31%), change to zopiclone (n = 537, 21%) and change to hypnotic benzodiazepines (n = 155, 6%). The most frequently prescribed hypnotic benzodiazepine was lormetazepam. We identified age, sex, treatment for psychiatric or addictive disorder and volume of zolpidem use before the measure as factors associated with different reimbursement trajectories after the regulatory change.

CONCLUSION

The regulatory change for zolpidem prescriptions reduced exposure to zolpidem among long-term users and also had a broad impact on prescriptions of other sedative medications. Switching to other medications that also present a potential risk of abuse or dependence should be carefully monitored.

Prediction of depression among medical check-ups of 433,190 patients: A nationwide population-based study

Depression is a mental illness that causes significant disturbances in daily life. Depression is commonly associated with low mood, severe health problems, and substantial socioeconomic burden; hence, it is necessary to be able to detect depression earlier. We utilized the medical check-up cohort database of the National Health Insurance Sharing Service in Korea. We split the total dataset into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Subsequently, five-fold cross validation was performed in the training set. The holdout test set was only used in the last step to evaluate the performance of the predictive model. Random forest algorithm was used for the predictive model. The analysis included 433,190 individuals who had a national medical check-up from 2009-2015, which included 10,824 (2.56%) patients in the depression group. The area under the receiver-operating curve was 0.849. Other performance metrics included a sensitivity of 0.737, specificity of 0.824, positive predictive value of 0.097, negative predictive value of 0.992, and accuracy of 0.780. Our predictive model could contribute to proactively reducing depression prevalence by administering interventions to prevent depression in patients receiving medical check-up. Future studies are needed to prospectively validate the predictability of this model.

Potentially inappropriate medications in Chinese older adults: a comparison of two updated Beers criteria

Background Beers criteria have been into the mainstay to characterize the potentially inappropriate medication since its first publication, but the recent version, Beers 2019, is yet to be validated by clinical studies nationally. Objective To identify the prevalence and the predictors of potentially inappropriate medications in hospitalized geriatric patients based on the Beers 2019 and 2015 criteria. Setting Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, a 3000-bed tertiary care teaching hospital in China. Method We conducted a cross-sectional study from July 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. Data from all hospitalized patients aged ≥ 65 years were collected from the hospital database. Inappropriate prescriptions were identified using the Beers 2019 criteria and the Beers 2015 criteria. Main outcome measure Prevalence Ratio (PR) and predictors of potentially inappropriate medications. Results The prevalence of inappropriate prescriptions based on the Beers 2019 criteria was 64.80%. This result was slightly higher than that of the Beers 2015 criteria (64.31%). The most commonly encountered inappropriate prescriptions identified using the two criteria were proton-pump inhibitors. The kappa coefficient was 0.826 (p < 0.001) indicating a strong coherence between the two criteria. The most important factor associated with inappropriate medications use was the number of prescribed drugs (PR 5.17, 95% CI 2.89-8.43; PR 4.58, 95% CI 1.93-7.25). Conclusion This study showed a high prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication in the Chinese geriatric population, which was associated with the number of prescribed drugs. The predictors identified in this research might help pharmacists to detect high-risk drugs and intervene in time.

Use of benzodiazepines and z-drugs not compliant with guidelines and associated factors: a population-based study

Benzodiazepines and z-drugs are primarily indicated for the treatment of sleep disorders and anxiety symptoms. Their frequent long-term use contrasts with the international guidelines that limit treatment duration to a maximum of 4 weeks. The objective of this study was to assess the frequency of their use that was not in accordance with guidelines in the French general population between 2007 and 2012 and associated characteristics. A cohort of 67,550 benzodiazepine new users was set up in an exhaustive database for health-care reimbursements and representative of the French population. Benzodiazepine use not in accordance with guidelines was defined as the concomitant dispensation of several benzodiazepines, the dispensation of treatment over a period longer than recommended, or a new dispensing within the 2 months following the end of a previous treatment of maximum recommended duration, considering that French recommendations distinguish between hypnotic (4 weeks) and anxiolytic benzodiazepines (12 weeks). Benzodiazepine use not in accordance with guidelines was high, in about 30% of new hypnotic users and 20% of new anxiolytic users. Its frequency was stable over the study period. Associated characteristics were similar for new hypnotic or anxiolytic users, i.e.. older age, treatment initiation by a psychiatrist, presence of a chronic disease, hospitalization, or another psychotropic treatment. These findings provide a solid basis for establishing a public health policy to reduce benzodiazepine use not compliant with guidelines. They should be further explored in patients most at risk in the present study, e.g., patients treated by a psychiatrist.

The Antidepressant Effect of Ketamine Is Dampened by Concomitant Benzodiazepine Medication

The rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine has become a breakthrough in the research and treatment of depression. Although predictive and modulating factors of the response to ketamine are broadly studied, little is known about optimal concurrent medication protocols. Concerning gamma-aminobutyric acid neurotransmission being a shared target for both ketamine and benzodiazepines (BZD), we evaluated the influence of BZD on the antidepressant effect of a single ketamine infusion in depressed patients. Data from 47 patients (27 females) with major depression (MADRS ≥ 20, ≥ 1 prior nonresponse to antidepressant treatment in current episode) who participated in two previous studies (EudraCT Number: 2009-010625-39 and 2013-000952-17) entered the analysis. All of the subjects were given an infusion of a subanesthetic dose of racemic ketamine (0.54 mg per kg) as an add-on medication to ongoing antidepressant treatment. Thirteen patients (28%) reached ≥ 50% reduction in MADRS within one week after ketamine administration. Nineteen (40%) patients took concomitant benzodiazepines on a daily basis. The doses of BZDs were significantly higher in nonresponders (p=0.007). ROC analysis distinguished responders from nonresponders by a criterion of >8mg of diazepam equivalent dose (DZ equivalent) with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 85% (p<0.001). RM-ANOVA revealed a different time pattern of response to ketamine between the BZD+ (>8mg of DZ equivalent) and BZD- (≤8mg of DZ equivalent) groups, with a significantly worse outcome in BZD+ on day 3 (p=0.04) and day 7 (p=0.02). The results of the study indicate that concomitant benzodiazepine treatment in higher doses may attenuate ketamine's antidepressant effect. The pathophysiological, clinical and methodological implications of this finding should be considered in future research and ketamine treatment.

The effect of short-term use of benzodiazepines on cognitive function of major depressive disorder patients being treated with antidepressants

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of short-term use of benzodiazepines (BZDs) on cognitive function of major depressive disorder (MDD) patients being treated with antidepressants (ADs).

METHODS

This was a part of a multi-center, multi-stage and prospective study of "Objective Diagnostic Indicators and Individualized Drug Intervention of Major Depressive Disorder (OIMDD)". Three hundred and fifty-three patients treated with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) alone (Group 1) and 49 patients treated with SSRIs combined with short-term use of BZDs (Group 2) during the acute treatment period were included in the analysis. Cognitive function and depressive and anxiety symptoms were assessed at baseline, weekend 8 and 48. A cognitive test battery included 5 domains: information processing speed assessed by the Animal Verbal Fluency Scale (AVFS), Digit Symbol Coding Test (DSCT) and Color Trial Test (CTT), verbal learning assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R), visual learning assessed by the Brief Visual Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R), executive function assessed by the Stroop Color Word Test (SCWT), and attention or vigilance assessed by the Continuous Performance Test (CPT).

RESULTS

Significant differences were found in education level (χ² = 5.442, p = 0.020), the severity of depressive (t = -1.982, p = 0.048) and anxiety symptoms (t = -2.629, p = 0.009) between Group 1 and 2 at baseline. There were no significant differences between G1 and G2 in cognitive functions at baseline. After Multiple correction, DSCT was better in patients treated with BZDs combined with ADs than in patients with ADs alone at weekend 8 without controlling education level, depressive and anxiety symptoms at baseline (F = -2.747, p = 0.042). After controlling these factors at baseline, the DSCT was still slightly high in patients treated with ADs combined with BZDs than in patients with ADs alone at weekend 8 (OR = 1.052, 95%CI:1.000-1.105). The repeated measurement analysis of variance showed that the DSCT could be improved by the treatment of BZDs combined with ADs at 1-year follow-up compared to baseline (F = 7.569, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that short-term use of BZDs does not impair cognitive function of MDD patients; conversely, it could improve the information processing speed after acute treatment and at 1 year follow up.

Exploring characteristics associated with first benzodiazepine prescription in patients with affective disorders and related diagnoses

OBJECTIVE

In patients with affective disorders, benzodiazepines (BZDs) are frequently administered at the onset, sometimes inappropriately. We sought to identify clinical variables associated with first BZD prescription in a large sample of patients with affective disorders.

METHODS

Four hundred sixty patients with mood or anxiety disorders attending different psychiatric services were assessed comparing those who received BZD as first treatment (BZD w/) and those who did not (BZD w/o).

RESULTS

More than one third (35.7%) of the total sample had received BZDs as first prescription. In relation to mood disorders, BZD w/ subjects more frequently (a) had not a psychiatrist as first therapist, (b) had anxious symptoms at onset, (c) had adjustment disorder as first diagnosis, (d) were treated as outpatients. In relation to specific diagnoses, (a) personal decision of treatment for major depressive disorder, (b) outpatient status for bipolar disorder and (c) longer duration of untreated illness for adjustment disorder were more frequently associated with first BZD prescription. For anxiety disorders, the presence of stressful life events and the diagnoses of panic disorder or specific phobias were more frequently observed in BZD w/ patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients with affective disorders frequently received BZDs as first prescription with significant differences between and within mood and anxiety disorders.

Benzodiazepine usage and patient preference for alternative therapies: A descriptive study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The prevalence of chronic benzodiazepine use in primary care settings remains high despite clear evidence of adverse health outcomes resulting from long-term use and the availability of effective alternative behavioural therapies. Eliciting factors influencing past or current usage experience of benzodiazepine users and their future behavioural intention regarding discontinuation or alternative behavioural therapy adoption could be useful in developing informed strategies facilitating successful benzodiazepine withdrawal in long-term users. The aim of this study was to identify patient factors influencing their current long-term benzodiazepine use, past withdrawal attempt, and future intention to trial safer alternative behavioural therapies. Additionally, the study also aimed to explore patients' preference for information sources on behavioural therapies.

METHODS

Point of purchase surveys were conducted with patients obtaining benzodiazepines from selected pharmacies across New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Survey items included the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ-specific), questions about patient's sociodemographic characteristics, as well as their views about long-term benzodiazepine use and behavioural therapies.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were recruited from 12 pharmacies across New South Wales (NSW). The surveys were conducted from November 2016 to July 2017. The mean (±SD) age of the participants was 54.3 (±16.7) with a range of 23 to 86 years, and 67% of the participants had been using the benzodiazepine for at least 1 year. Lower-education levels, stronger beliefs about the necessity of use, and lower concerns about ongoing benzodiazepine use were significantly associated with prolonged use. Sixty-four percent of the participants were not interested in behavioural therapies, and there was a significant relationship between the participants' future preference for behavioural therapies and their concerns about the potential adverse effects of benzodiazepines. A majority of the participants rated general practitioners (GPs) as their first choice and pharmacists as the second choice for discussing behavioural therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific individual sociodemographic characteristics of benzodiazepine users and their medication-related beliefs influence their current benzodiazepine usage and future intention to trial behavioural therapies as an alternative to their benzodiazepines. Based on the reported preferences of benzodiazepine users in this study, developing and evaluating GP-pharmacist collaborative services to improve the uptake of behavioural therapies as an alternative to benzodiazepines can be recommended.

Initiation and long-term use of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVES

Increasing evidence points to the harmful effects of long-term benzodiazepine treatment. Our objective was to study the incidence of, and predictors for, long-term use of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in bipolar disorder.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study, using data from Swedish national registers. Swedish residents aged 18-75 years with a recorded diagnosis of bipolar disorder or mania between July 2006 and December 2012, and no history of benzodiazepine/Z-drug use in the past year, were included. Patients were followed for 1 year with regard to prescription fills of benzodiazepines/Z-drugs. Initiators were followed for another year during which continuous use for >6 months was defined as "long-term". Patient and prescription characteristics were investigated as potential predictors for long-term use in multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Out of the 21 883 patients included, 29% started benzodiazepine/Z-drug treatment, of whom one in five became long-term users. Patients who were prescribed clonazepam or alprazolam had high odds for subsequent long-term use (adjusted odds ratios [aORs] 3.78 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.24-6.38] and 2.03 [95% CI 1.30-3.18], respectively), compared to those prescribed diazepam. Polytherapy with benzodiazepines/Z-drugs also predicted long-term use (aOR 2.46, 95% CI 1.79-3.38), as did age ≥60 years (aOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.46-2.53, compared to age <30 years), and concomitant treatment with psychostimulants (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.33-2.39).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of subsequent long-term use among bipolar benzodiazepine initiators is high. Patients on clonazepam, alprazolam or benzodiazepine/Z-drug polytherapy have the highest risk of becoming long-term users, suggesting that these treatments should be used restrictively.

Chinese perspectives on primary care for common mental disorders: Barriers and policy implications

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) has called for integration of mental health into primary care for a decade. In Western countries, around 15% to 25% of patients with common mental disorders including mood and anxiety disorders seek help from primary care physicians (PCPs). The rate is only about 5% in China.

AIMS

This article reviews the Chinese findings on the barriers to primary care for common mental disorders and how they compared with Western findings.

METHODS

A narrative literature review was conducted, focusing on literature published from mid-1990s in English or Chinese. Patient, PCP and health system factors were reviewed.

RESULTS

Although Chinese and Western findings show similar themes of barriers, the Chinese have stronger barriers in most aspects, including under-recognition of the need for treatment, stigma on mental illness, somatization, worries about taking psychiatric drugs, uncertainties in the role, competency and legitimacy of PCPs in mental health care and short consultation time.

CONCLUSION

Current policies in China emphasize enhancement of mental health facilities and workforce in the community. Our review suggests that patients' intention to seek help and PCPs' competency in mental health care are other fundamental factors to be addressed.