Effects of neurodynamic treatment on hamstrings flexibility: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Effect of neuromeningeal mobilization and postural re-education exercises for persistent hamstring strain: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Despite appropriate interventions, healing following hamstring strain tends to be slow. Prediction for return to play is inconsistent, and recurrence of injuries is high, which poses a challenge and burden to athletes, sports physiotherapists, and trainers. The exact mechanism of hamstring strain injury or re-injury still remains unclear. The primary focus of this case report was to discuss a patient's course of treatment with relentless symptoms of hamstring strain and how he responded to neuromeningeal mobilization and postural re-education.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 20-year-old male Arabic martial artist had a history of left hamstring strain for the past 5 weeks. He had undergone pharmacological and physiotherapeutic interventions for his clinical conditions but had not responded favorably. Further clinical assessment had ruled out hamstring syndrome. The patient refrained from all sports activities.

INTERVENTION

The patient was treated using a modified slump mobilization technique with four repetitions for 3 consecutive days, together with postural retraining. Results of the numeric pain rating scale and Knee Society score before and after the interventions were obtained.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Pre-intervention score of the numeric pain rating scale was 5/10 and 7/10 at rest and with activity, respectively. Assessment on the 3rd consecutive day of intervention, the numeric pain rating scale decreased to 2/10 and 4/10 at rest and with activity, respectively. Similarly, the pre- and post-intervention Knee Society score improved from 22 to 61 in pain and from 30 to 80 in function. At the 2-month follow-up, the patient reported a complete recovery from symptoms and resumed his sports activities without any disruption.

CONCLUSION

Neuromeningel mobilization and postural re-education exercises are suggested as mainstream of treatment for hamstring strains, even when the slump test is negative. This report calls for a need of advancement in diagnostic procedure dealing with all hamstring strain injury conditions. More prospective studies are recommended to confirm the current findings.

Straight leg raise versus knee extension angle: which structure limits the test in asymptomatic subjects?

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine if the first onset of symptoms (discomfort) during the straight leg raise (SLR) (hip flexion with an extended knee) and the Knee Extension Angle (KEA) tests (knee extension with 90°of hip flexion) results from nervous or muscular structures in asymptomatic individuals. The secondary objective was to investigate if the gender influences the structure related to the discomfort.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study consisted of a single assessment session during which the structure related to participants' discomfort during the KEA and SLR was identified. For this identification, a structural differentiation (SD) was conducted during both tests using passive mobilization of the cervicothoracic spine in flexion and extension. Changes in participants' discomfort were monitored during the SD to determine whether a change or lack of change was consistent with variations in the load applied to the suspected structures either muscular or neural. If the structure related to the participants' discomfort could not be identified, two additional tests were conducted: the lateral SLR and the Slump test.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-eight individuals were included. Median [IQR] age was 21 years [20;23], and 57.3% were female. The structure related to participants' discomfort was similar for the SLR and the KEA (p = 0.451): neural for 72.5% of participants in the SLR and 75.8% in the KEA. Gender only influenced the structure identified in the KEA test, with a significantly higher rate of nerve-related discomfort in females than males and a significantly higher rate of muscle-related discomfort in males (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

In asymptomatic individuals, the discomfort induced by the SLR and the KEA tests could be related to either muscular or neural structures. Therefore, structural differentiation is necessary to identify the structure causing the discomfort in both research and clinical practice.

Immediate and short-term effects of neurodynamic techniques on hamstring flexibility: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Good hamstring flexibility(HF) is crucial for sports performance and health, with injuries having an economic impact on healthcare and sports teams. Therefore, our objectives were to estimate the effect of neurodynamic techniques on HF and to compare the effect of these techniques with static stretching.

METHODS

We systematically searched the Cochrane, MEDLINE(via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science and Sportdiscus databases for RCTs comparing neurodynamic interventions with control intervention or with static stretching exercises for HF in adults with limited HF. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis with subgroup analyses according to the type of comparison group(control group or static stretching exercises) and total number of sessions. Furthermore, to reflect the variation in genuine therapy effects in different scenarios, including future patients, we calculated a 95% prediction interval(prI).

RESULTS

Thirteen trials were included, involving 624 participants. Pooled results showed a significant improvement in HF for immediate (SMD = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.59) and short-term effects (SMD = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.52). Subgroup analyses by type of comparison group showed that these techniques are more effective than the control group in the immediate and short term and than static stretching in the short term. Analyses by total sessions showed a significant increase in HF with a treatment of 1, 3, 10 and 12 sessions.

CONCLUSION

Neurodynamic techniques improve HF immediately and in the short term. Subgroup analyses by type of comparison group showed that these techniques are more effective than static stretching in the short term.

London International Consensus and Delphi study on hamstring injuries part 3: rehabilitation, running and return to sport

Hamstring injuries (HSIs) are the most common athletic injury in running and pivoting sports, but despite large amounts of research, injury rates have not declined in the last 2 decades. HSI often recur and many areas are lacking evidence and guidance for optimal rehabilitation. This study aimed to develop an international expert consensus for the management of HSI. A modified Delphi methodology and consensus process was used with an international expert panel, involving two rounds of online questionnaires and an intermediate round involving a consensus meeting. The initial information gathering round questionnaire was sent to 46 international experts, which comprised open-ended questions covering decision-making domains in HSI. Thematic analysis of responses outlined key domains, which were evaluated by a smaller international subgroup (n=15), comprising clinical academic sports medicine physicians, physiotherapists and orthopaedic surgeons in a consensus meeting. After group discussion around each domain, a series of consensus statements were prepared, debated and refined. A round 2 questionnaire was sent to 112 international hamstring experts to vote on these statements and determine level of agreement. Consensus threshold was set a priori at 70%. Expert response rates were 35/46 (76%) (first round), 15/35 (attendees/invitees to meeting day) and 99/112 (88.2%) for final survey round. Statements on rehabilitation reaching consensus centred around: exercise selection and dosage (78.8%-96.3% agreement), impact of the kinetic chain (95%), criteria to progress exercise (73%-92.7%), running and sprinting (83%-100%) in rehabilitation and criteria for return to sport (RTS) (78.3%-98.3%). Benchmarks for flexibility (40%) and strength (66.1%) and adjuncts to rehabilitation (68.9%) did not reach agreement. This consensus panel recommends individualised rehabilitation based on the athlete, sporting demands, involved muscle(s) and injury type and severity (89.8%). Early-stage rehab should avoid high strain loads and rates. Loading is important but with less consensus on optimum progression and dosage. This panel recommends rehabilitation progress based on capacity and symptoms, with pain thresholds dependent on activity, except pain-free criteria supported for sprinting (85.5%). Experts focus on the demands and capacity required for match play when deciding the rehabilitation end goal and timing of RTS (89.8%). The expert panellists in this study followed evidence on aspects of rehabilitation after HSI, suggesting rehabilitation prescription should be individualised, but clarified areas where evidence was lacking. Additional research is required to determine the optimal load dose, timing and criteria for HSI rehabilitation and the monitoring and testing metrics to determine safe rapid progression in rehabilitation and safe RTS. Further research would benefit optimising: prescription of running and sprinting, the application of adjuncts in rehabilitation and treatment of kinetic chain HSI factors.

Changes in tibial nerve stiffness during ankle dorsiflexion according to in-vivo analysis with shear wave elastography

A more detailed assessment of pathological changes in the tibial nerve (TN) is needed to better assess how physical therapy influences TN pathologies. The cross-sectional nerve area can be used for TN assessment but may be influenced by individual differences in parameters, such as body height, body weight, and foot length. Therefore, there are no known reliable noninvasive quantitative methods for assessing TN neuropathy. Although recent ultrasonographic studies reported that TN stiffness changes could be used to assess TN neuropathies of the foot, these studies did not consider the joint position, and peripheral nerve tension can change with joint movement. Therefore, we considered that TN stiffness assessment could be improved by analyzing the relationship between ankle joint position and TN stiffness. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between TN stiffness and ankle angle changes using shear wave elastography. We hypothesized that the TN shear wave velocity significantly increases with ankle dorsiflexion and that the total ankle range or maximum dorsiflexion range correlates with the shear wave velocity. This cross-sectional study included 20 TNs of 20 healthy adults. Ultrasonography and shear wave elastography were used to evaluate the TN. TN stiffness was measured at 5 ankle positions as follows: maximum dorsiflexion (100% df), plantar flexion in the resting position (0% df), and 3 intermediate points (25% df, 50% df, and 75% df). TN shear wave velocity increased with an increase in ankle df angle. While total ankle range was significantly and negatively correlated with TN stiffness in all ankle positions, the maximum ankle df angle was significantly and negatively correlated only at 75% and 100% df. TN stiffness below 50% df may be affected by gliding or decreased nerve loosening, and TN stiffness above 75% df may be influenced by nerve tensioning. When measuring TN stiffness for diagnostic purposes, TN should be assessed at an ankle joint angle below 50% df.

Effects of Neural Mobilization on Pain Intensity, Disability, and Mechanosensitivity: An Umbrella Review With Meta-Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the current evidence for the effects of neural mobilization (NM) treatments.

METHODS

Three umbrella reviews with meta-meta-analyses were conducted to determine the effects of NM on pain intensity and disability in people with musculoskeletal disorders and on mechanosensitivity in participants who were asymptomatic. The study used the grading criteria proposed by the Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee to assess the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

One meta-meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant moderate effect on pain intensity (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.75, 95% CI = -1.12 to -0.38) but with evidence of heterogeneity (Q = 14.13; I2 = 65%). The study found a significantly large effect of NM on disability (SMD = -1.22, 95% CI = -2.19 to -0.26), again with evidence of heterogeneity (Q = 31.57; I2 = 87%). The third meta-meta-analysis showed a statistically significant moderate effect of NM on mechanosensitivity (SMD = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.35 to 1.57), with no evidence of heterogeneity (Q = 2.73; I2 = 63%). For all examined outcomes, the quality of evidence was limited.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the results indicated that although NM treatment had a moderate to large beneficial clinical effect on pain intensity and disability in people with musculoskeletal disorders and on mechanosensitivity in individuals who were asymptomatic, the quality of evidence was limited.

IMPACT

Neural mobilization treatments showed positive results on the pain intensity and disability in individuals with musculoskeletal conditions. Neural mobilization could be integrated into the physical therapy management, although more research is needed.

The SWING test: A more reliable test than passive clinical tests for assessing sagittal plane hip mobility

BACKGROUND

Clinical assessment of sagittal plane hip mobility is usually performed using the Modified Thomas Test (for extension) and the Straight-Leg-Raise (for flexion) with a goniometer. These tests have limited reliability, however. An active swinging leg movement test (the SWING test), assessed using 3D motion analysis, could provide an alternative to these passive clinical tests.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is the SWING test a more reliable alternative to evaluate hip mobility, in comparison to the clinical extension and flexion tests?

METHODS

Ten asymptomatic adult participants were evaluated by two investigators over three sessions. Participants performed 10 maximal hip extensions and flexions, with both legs straight and no trunk movement (the SWING test). Hip kinematics was assessed using a 3D motion analysis system. Maximal and minimal hip angles were calculated for each swing and represented maximal hip flexion (SWING flexion) and extension (SWING extension), respectively. The Modified Thomas Test and Straight-Leg-Raise were repeated 3 times for each leg. On the first day, both investigators performed all the tests (SWING + Modified Thomas Test + Straight-Leg-Raise). A week later, a single investigator repeated all the tests. Inter-rater, intra-rater, within-day and between-day reliability were evaluated using intra-class correlation.

RESULTS

Intra-class correlation coefficients for all the tests were superior to 0.8, except for the Modified Thomas Test's intra-rater, between-day (intra-class correlation 0.673) and the Straight-Leg-Raise's inter-rater, within-day (intra-class correlation 0.294). The SWING test always showed a higher intra-class correlation coefficient than the passive clinical tests. The only significant correlation found was for the Straight-Leg-Raise and SWING flexion (r = 0.48; P < 0.001).

SIGNIFICANCE

The SWING test seems to be an alternative to existing passive clinical tests, offering better reliability for assessing sagittal plane hip mobility.

Sports Medicine Considerations During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has resulted in upward of 14 million confirmed cases and >597,000 deaths worldwide as of July 19, 2020. The current disruption in sports activities caused by COVID-19 presents a challenge to physicians, coaches, and trainers in discerning best practices for a safe return to sport. There is a distinct need to develop and adopt consistent measures for resumption of sports activities, including training and competition, in a way that places the health and well-being of athletes at the forefront while also protecting coaches, allied staff, and spectators. This article provides an overview of the effects of COVID-19 in the athletic population and presents considerations for training during the pandemic, as well as guidelines for return to sports as restrictions are lifted.

Second Wave of COVID-19 Global Pandemic and Athletes' Confinement: Recommendations to Better Manage and Optimize the Modified Lifestyle

Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious viral disease that has spread globally, resulting in the ongoing pandemic. Currently, there is no vaccine or specific treatment for COVID-19. Preventive measures to reduce the chances of contagion consist mainly of confinement, avoiding crowded places, social distancing, masks, and applying strict personal hygiene as recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). After the first wave of infection in many countries, the potential effects of relaxing containment and physical distancing control measures suggest that as a result of these measures, a second wave of COVID-19 appears probable in these countries. In sport, the period of self-isolation, and quarantine, for COVID-19 affects the physical preparation of athletes as well as their mental health and quality of life to an even greater extent (i.e., nutrition, sleep, healthy lifestyle), and thus, relevant and practical recommendations are needed to help alleviate these physical and mental health concerns. Our review aims to summarize the physiological and psychological effects of detraining associated with athletes' confinement during the proposed second wave of COVID-19. This article also proposes answers to questions that concern the advantages and disadvantages of different types of social media platforms, the importance of nutrition, and the effects of sleep disturbance on the health and modified lifestyle of athletes during this worldwide pandemic. Thus, this review provides some general guidelines to better manage their modified lifestyle and optimally maintain their physical and mental fitness with respect to measures taken during this restrictive proposed second wave of the COVID-19 confinement period.

Immediate effects of neurodynamic nerve gliding versus static stretching on hamstring neuromechanical properties

PURPOSE

We investigated the immediate effects of neurodynamic nerve gliding (ND) on hamstring flexibility, viscoelasticity, and mechanosensitivity, compared with traditional static stretching (ST).

METHODS

Twenty-two physically active men aged 21.9 ± 1.9 years were divided randomly into two equal intervention groups using ST or ND. An isokinetic dynamometer was used to measure the active knee joint position sense, perform passive knee extension, record the passive extension range of motion (ROM) and the passive-resistive torque of hamstrings. Stiffness was determined from the slope of the passive torque-angle relationship. A stress relaxation test (SRT) was performed to analyze the viscoelastic behavior of the hamstrings. The passive straight leg raise (SLR) test was used to evaluate hamstring flexibility.

RESULTS

A significant interaction was observed for ROM and passive ultimate stiffness, reflected by an increase in these indicators after ND but not after SD. SLR increased significantly in both groups. After ST, a significantly faster initial stress relaxation was observed over the first 4 s. than after ND. There was no significant change in the active knee joint position sense.

CONCLUSIONS

ND provided a slightly greater increase in hamstring extensibility and passive stiffness, possibly by decreasing nerve tension and increasing strain in connective tissues than ST. The ST mostly affected the viscoelastic behavior of the hamstrings, but neither intervention had a significant impact on proprioception.

Strategies and Solutions for Team Sports Athletes in Isolation due to COVID-19

In December of 2019, there was an outbreak of a severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by the Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19) in China. The virus rapidly spread into the whole World causing an unprecedented pandemic and forcing governments to impose a global quarantine, entering an extreme unknown situation. The organizational consequences of quarantine/isolation are: absence of organized training and competition, lack of communication among athletes and coaches, inability to move freely, lack of adequate sunlight exposure, inappropriate training conditions. Based on the current scientific, we strongly recommend encouraging the athlete to reset their mindset to understand quarantine as an opportunity for development, organizing appropriate guidance, educating and encourage athletes to apply appropriate preventive behavior and hygiene measures to promote immunity and ensuring good living isolation conditions. The athlete's living space should be equipped with cardio and resistance training equipment (portable bicycle or rowing ergometer). Some forms of body mass resistance circuit-based training could promote aerobic adaptation. Sports skills training should be organized based on the athlete's needs. Personalized conditioning training should be carried out with emphasis on neuromuscular performance. Athletes should also be educated about nutrition (Vitamin D and proteins) and hydration. Strategies should be developed to control body composition. Mental fatigue should be anticipated and mental controlled. Adequate methods of recovery should be provided. Daily monitoring should be established. This is an ideal situation in which to rethink personal life, understanding the situation, that can be promoted in these difficult times that affect practically the whole world.