Utility of local suicide data for informing local and national suicide prevention strategies

Dying at work. Work-related suicide – how does the UK regulatory context measure up?

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine how work-related suicides are monitored, investigated and regulated in the UK, examining a small selection of cases and drawing on international comparison with other countries. Effective data collection and regulation are the cornerstone of suicide prevention, and this paper aims to consider whether the UK’s current regulatory framework provides an effective basis for preventing work-related suicides.

Design/methodology/approach

This study draws on qualitative sociological methods and is based on an in-depth analysis of 12 suicide cases occurring between 2015 and 2020. In each case, work-related causal factors had been previously identified by at least one official source (police enquiry, coroner or employer’s investigation). This study analysed multiple sources of documentation and undertook interviews with individuals close to each suicide case. The aim of this study was to consider the organisational response of three stakeholder organisations to the suicides: the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), the coroner and the employer.

Findings

The study points to serious shortcomings in the UK’s regulatory response to work-related suicides. Suicides are currently not recorded, investigated or regulated. Whereas the fracture of an arm or leg in the workplace needs to be reported to the HSE for further investigation, a suicide occurring in the workplace or that is work-related does not need to be reported to any public agency. Employers are not required to investigate an employee suicide or make any changes to workplace policies and practices in the aftermath of a suicide. The work-related factors that may have caused one suicide may, therefore, continue to pose health and safety risks to other employees.

Originality/value

Whereas some recent studies have examined work-related suicides within specific occupations in the UK, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to analyse the UK’s regulatory framework for work-related suicides. The study on which the paper is based produced a set of recommendations that were targeted at key stakeholder organisations.

Data-informed targets for suicide prevention: a small-area analysis of high-risk suicide regions in Australia

PURPOSE

To investigate small-area variation in risks associated with suicide deaths across four regional communities in New South Wales, Australia, and to determine whether these areas have unique demographic and socioeconomic risk profiles that could inform targeted means restriction suicide prevention efforts.

METHODS

Archival data on suicide mortality for all deaths in New South Wales, Australia, over the period 2006-2015 were geospatially attributed to four high-risk priority regions. Deaths in the four regions were compared to each other, and to NSW, on demographic factors, indicators of economic deprivation, and suicide means.

RESULTS

Priority means restriction targets were identified for all sites. In Murrumbidgee, suicide deaths were significantly more likely to involve firearms and older males (p < 0.001). The Central Coast had a greater proportion of overdose deaths (p < 0.001), which were associated with being female and unemployed. Suicide deaths in Newcastle were associated with being younger (p = 0.001) and involving 'jumping from a height' (p < 0.001), while economic deprivation was a major risk for suicide death in Illawarra Shoalhaven (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Local regions were significantly differentiated from each other, and from the State, in terms of priority populations and means of suicide, demonstrating the need for locally based, targeted interventions. There were, however, also some risk constancies across all sites (males, hanging, economic deprivation), suggesting that prevention initiatives should, optimally, be delivered within multilevel models that target risk commonalities and provide tailored initiatives that address risk specific to a region.

Comparison of familial and non-familial suicidal behaviors among people with major depressive disorder: Testing the discriminative predicting role of high-yield clinical variables

BACKGROUND

Suicidal behavior in first-degree relatives of people diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) increases the risk of suicidal behavior. Such an effect may be the result of genetic risk factors or environmental ones, including imitation, or both. Surprisingly few studies have examined this question and thus, there still is little known about the effect of first-degree family history of suicidal behavior on the type of suicidal behavior and profile of risk factors related to the diathesis for suicidal behavior. Even less is known about intra-familial risk transmission.

METHODS

Patients with MDD (n = 252) experiencing a current major depressive episode and who had a previous suicide attempt were studied. Those with and without a family history of first-degree relatives who had made a suicide attempt or died by suicide were compared across clinical and suicide-related characteristics.

RESULTS

Suicide attempters with (FDR⁺, n = 59) and without a first-degree relative with suicide attempt or suicide (FDR^-, n = 193) were similar in terms of type or frequency of suicide attempts, level of lifetime aggression and impulsivity, age of onset of depression and age at first suicide attempt.

LIMITATIONS

Cross-Sectional study. Lack of additional external validators.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to our hypothesis and the concept of "genetic anticipation", a first-degree family history of suicide attempt or suicide in currently depressed attempters with MDD was not associated with a range of clinical and suicide-related characteristics. Longitudinal studies incorporating external validators and potential biological markers may advance this area of research.

Factors associated with suicides in Wolverhampton: Relevance of local audits exploring preventability

Suicide rates and associated risk factors are known to change over time. The periodic evaluation of suicides in a particular locality may identify specific issues that may help in prevention efforts. The profile of 146 consecutive cases with suicide, open and narrative verdicts between January 2004 and July 2011 in Wolverhampton was studied in order to explore associated factors. Specific information about methods, mental health issues and stressors was collected. There was considerable variation in suicides in different wards of the city, with higher occurrences in inner-city areas. Male suicides were three times more common, and they were significantly younger than in female suicides. Common methods were hanging (52.7%) and poisoning (21.9%) involving a wide range of drugs. Life events were reported in 52.1% suicides, most frequently relational problems (28.1%), followed by physical illness and bereavement. Mental-health factors were associated with 63.0% of suicides, predominantly depression (45.9%) and alcohol and drug abuse (6.8%). The majority of the suicide victims (63.0%) were not in contact with mental-health services, including: most men (68.8%), young suicides up to age 34 (78.6%), the elderly (69.2%) and Asians (70.0%). A considerable proportion of these suicides had mental-health issues, mainly depression (42.4%) and alcohol or drug abuse (6.5%). Significantly more of them (69.6% vs. 22.2%) had stressors compared with suicides known to mental-health services. The findings of the study highlighted risk factors that may help prioritising intervention initiatives. It appears that local suicide audits may complement national information on suicide in designing appropriate local suicide-prevention strategies.