Psychological distress in frequent users of primary health care and emergency departments: a scoping review

A Comparison of Patients Presenting with Suicide Attempts, Psychopathology Symptoms, or Pain within Emergency Departments

Previous suicide attempts, psychopathology symptoms, and pain significantly increase risk of suicide, a leading cause of death. It is possible that patients across these three groups exhibit key differences that could provide insights into unique interventions for suicide-related outcomes. Data were collected using a standardized form at 432 emergency departments (EDs; 14,018 participants [females, n = 8,042; 57.4%; males, n = 5,976; 42.6%]). We conducted a series of ANOVAs to investigate if patients presenting for (1) suicide attempts (n = 33; 0.2%), (2) psychopathology symptoms (n = 1,104; 7.9%), or (3) pain (n = 12,881; 91.9%) varied across a variety of healthcare-relevant variables. Findings indicated that patients presenting with suicide attempts were seen with more urgency (F[2,12054] = 66.41, p < .001) and were more likely to be admitted to hospitalization (F[2,14015] = 187.296, p < .001), observation unit overall (F[2,14015] = 78.572, p < .001), or transferred to another hospital (F[2,14015] = 406.568, p < .001); they also required longer visits (F [2, 12054] = 66.41, p < .001) as compared to patients with psychopathology symptoms or pain. Notably, potentially important similarities between groups emerged: groups did not differ across leaving without medical screening, leaving against medical advice, or contact with healthcare providers in the long-term (i.e., twelve months) or short-term (i.e., 72 hours) preceding ED admission. These findings in particular indicate that there could be ample time (1) prior to admission to intervene and (2) during care in EDs to connect patients to goal-oriented, time-limited evidence based psychotherapies at a time when they may be particularly willing to engage in care.

Psychological Nursing Effect of Patients with Gynecological Malignant Tumor

Objective

To analyze the psychological nursing effect of patients with gynecological malignant tumor.

Method

A total of 104 patients with gynecological malignant tumor receiving chemotherapy in our hospital from December 2019 to November 2020 were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group with 52 cases each. Patients in the control group were treated with routine nursing of gynecological malignant tumor chemotherapy. The observation group applied psychological nursing methods on the basis of the control group, and psychological status, quality of sleep, quality of life, treatment coordination, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.

Results

There was no difference in anxiety and depression scores (P > 0.05), the postintervention score was lower than the preintervention score, and the reduction was more significant in the observation group (P < 0.05). After intervention, PSQI scores of the two groups of subjects were significantly lower than before intervention (P < 0.05), subjects in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After intervention, the total score of FACT-B scale was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After the implementation of psychological nursing, the degree of tumor treatment cooperation of observation group was higher than the control group (P < 0.05). After intervention, there was no statistically significant difference in hematology, allergic reaction, or hair loss between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of gastrointestinal and neurological adverse events in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The psychological state of patients with gynecological malignant tumor mainly included anxiety and terror and so on. Through psychological counseling, it could effectively alleviate the abovementioned bad psychology, improve the cooperation of patients with tumor treatment, and reduce the occurrence of patients' adverse reactions.

Stress Measurement in Primary Care: Conceptual Issues, Barriers, Resources, and Recommendations for Study

OBJECTIVE

Exposure to stressors in daily life and dysregulated stress responses are associated with increased risk for a variety of chronic mental and physical health problems, including anxiety disorders, depression, asthma, heart disease, certain cancers, and autoimmune and neurodegenerative disorders. Despite this fact, stress exposure and responses are rarely assessed in the primary care setting and infrequently targeted for disease prevention or treatment.

METHOD

In this narrative review, we describe the primary reasons for this striking disjoint between the centrality of stress for promoting disease and how rarely it is assessed by summarizing the main conceptual, measurement, practical, and reimbursement issues that have made stress difficult to routinely measure in primary care. The following issues will be reviewed: a) assessment of stress in primary care, b) biobehavioral pathways linking stress and illness, c) the value of stress measurements for improving outcomes in primary care, d) barriers to measuring and managing stress, and e) key research questions relevant to stress assessment and intervention in primary care.

RESULTS

On the basis of our synthesis, we suggest several approaches that can be pursued to advance this work, including feasibility and acceptability studies, cost-benefit studies, and clinical improvement studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Although stress is recognized as a key contributor to chronic disease risk and mortality, additional research is needed to determine how and when instruments for assessing life stress might be useful in the primary care setting, and how stress-related data could be integrated into disease prevention and treatment strategies to reduce chronic disease burden and improve human health and well-being.

Does living close to a petrochemical complex increase the adverse psychological effects of the COVID-19 lockdown?

The petrochemical industry has made the economic development of many local communities possible, increasing employment opportunities and generating a complex network of closely-related secondary industries. However, it is known that petrochemical industries emit air pollutants, which have been related to different negative effects on mental health. In addition, many people around the world are being exposed to highly stressful situations deriving from the COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdowns adopted by national and regional governments. The present study aims to analyse the possible differential effects on various psychological outcomes (stress, anxiety, depression and emotional regulation strategies) stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic and consequent lockdown experienced by individuals living near an important petrochemical complex and subjects living in other areas, nonexposed to the characteristic environmental pollutants emitted by these kinds of complex. The sample consisted of 1607 subjects who answered an ad hoc questionnaire on lockdown conditions, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS) and the Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ). The results indicate that people living closer to petrochemical complexes reported greater risk perception [K = 73.42, p < 0.001, with a medium size effect (η2 = 0.061)]. However, no significant relationship between psychological variables and proximity to the focus was detected when comparing people living near to or far away from a chemical/petrochemical complex. Regarding the adverse psychological effects of the first lockdown due to COVID-19 on the general population in Catalonia, we can conclude that the conditions included in this survey were mainly related to changes in the participants' impulsivity levels, with different total impulsivity scores being obtained if they had minors in their care (p<0.001), if they had lost their jobs, if they were working (p<0.001), if they were not telecommuting (p<0.001), if they went out to work (p<0.001) or if they established routines (p = 0.009). However, we can also be fairly certain that the economic effects are going to be worse than those initially detected in this study. More research will be necessary to corroborate our results.

CONECT-6: a case-finding tool to identify patients with complex health needs

Background

Early identification of patients with chronic conditions and complex health needs in emergency departments (ED) would enable the provision of services better suited to their needs, such as case management. A case-finding tool would ultimately support ED teams to this end and could reduce the cost of services due to avoidable ED visits and hospitalizations. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a short self-administered case-finding tool in EDs to identify patients with chronic conditions and complex health needs in an adult population.

Methods

This prospective development and initial validation study of a case-finding tool was conducted in four EDs in the province of Quebec (Canada). Adult patients with chronic conditions were approached at their third or more visit to the ED within 12 months to complete a self-administered questionnaire, which included socio-demographics, a comorbidity index, the reference standard INTERMED self-assessment, and 12 questions to develop the case-finding tool. Significant variables in bivariate analysis were included in a multivariate logistic regression analysis and a backward elimination procedure was applied. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was developed to identify the most appropriate threshold score to identify patients with complex health needs.

Results

Two hundred ninety patients participated in the study. The multivariate analysis yielded a six-question tool, COmplex NEeds Case-finding Tool – 6 (CONECT-6), which evaluates the following variables: low perceived health; limitations due to pain; unmet needs; high self-perceived complexity; low income; and poor social support. With a threshold of two or more positive answers, the sensitivity was 90% and specificity 66%. The positive and negative predictive values were 49 and 75% respectively.

Conclusions

The case-finding process is the essential characteristic of case management effectiveness. This study presents the first case-finding tool to identify adult patients with chronic conditions and complex health needs in ED.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06154-4.

Frequent users of emergency departments and patient flow in Alberta and Ontario, Canada: an administrative data study

Background

This paper describes and compares patient flow characteristics of adult high system users (HSUs) and control groups in Alberta and Ontario emergency departments (EDs), Canada.

Methods

Annual cohorts of HSUs were created by identifying patients who made up the top 10% of ED users (by count of ED presentations) in the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System during 2011–2016. Random samples of patients not in the HSU groups were selected as controls. Presentation (e.g., acuity) and ED times (e.g., time to physician initial assessment [PIA], length of stay) data were extracted and described. The length of stay for 2015/2016 data was decomposed into stages and Cox models compared time between stages.

Results

There were 20,343,230 and 18,222,969 ED presentations made by 7,032,655 and 1,923,462 individuals in the control and HSU groups, respectively. The Ontario groups had higher acuity than the Alberta groups: about 20% in the Ontario groups were from the emergent level whereas Alberta had 11–15%. Time to PIA was similar across provinces and groups (medians of 60 min to 67 min). Lengths of stay were longest for Ontario HSUs (median = 3 h) and shortest for Alberta HSUs (median = 2.2 h). HSUs had shorter times to PIA (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02,1.03), longer times from PIA to decision (HR = 0.84; 95%CI 0.84,0.84), and longer times from decision to leaving the ED (HR = 0.91; 95%CI 0.91,0.91).

Conclusions

Ontario HSUs had higher acuity and longer ED lengths of stay than the other groups. In both provinces, HSU had shorter times to PIA and longer times after assessment.

Differentiating middle-aged long-term and short-term frequent attenders by means of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 Study

BACKGROUND

Frequent attendance is largely a temporary phenomenon, but only few previous studies have made a distinction between long-term frequent attenders (FAs) and short-term FAs.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to compare the characteristics of middle-aged long-term FAs and short-term FAs.

METHODS

Data from a large Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study's (NFBC1966) 46-year follow-up study (performed in 2012, N = 10 321) were used. The participants (n = 4390) had used public primary healthcare (PPHC) services at least once during 2013-2016 according to Finnish national register data on outpatient visits. A FA was considered a patient who had used PPHC services ≥8 times during 1 year. A long-term FA: a patient who was a FA in at least 3 years during 2013-2016. A short-term FA: a patient who was a FA in 1 or 2 years in 2013-2016. Cross-tabulation, Pearson's chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney U test, and univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

Of the 4390 participants, 132 (3.0%) were long-term FAs, 645 (14.7%) were short-term FAs, and 3613 (82.3%) were non-FAs. During 2013-2016, long-term FAs accounted for 34.8% of PPHC visits, while short-term FAs accounted 15.4%. Compared to short-term FAs, depression and high income (preventive attribute) were associated with long-term FAs. Female gender and managing usual activities were associated with short-term FAs. Poor self-reported health was associated with both long-term FAs and short-term FAs but increased the risk of being a long-term FA over three times compared to short-term FAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Middle-aged long-term FAs and short-term FAs have distinct characteristics; namely, depression and high income differentiate long-term FAs from short-term FAs. Poor self-reported health was associated with long-term FAs in particular. In order to identify FAs with prolonged service needs and to develop far-reaching interventions, the focus of research should be on long-term FAs.