Bronchodilator reversibility testing in an adult general population; the importance of smoking and anthropometrical variables on the response to a beta2-agonist

A genome-wide association study of bronchodilator response in participants of European and African ancestry from six independent cohorts

Introduction

Bronchodilator response (BDR) is a measurement of acute bronchodilation in response to short-acting β2-agonists, with a heritability between 10 and 40%. Identifying genetic variants associated with BDR may lead to a better understanding of its complex pathophysiology.

Methods

We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of BDR in six adult cohorts with participants of European ancestry (EA) and African ancestry (AA) including community cohorts and cohorts ascertained on the basis of obstructive pulmonary disease. Validation analysis was carried out in two paediatric asthma cohorts.

Results

A total of 10 623 EA and 3597 AA participants were included in the analyses. No single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was associated with BDR at the conventional genome-wide significance threshold (p<5×10-8). Performing fine mapping and using a threshold of p<5×10-6 to identify suggestive variants of interest, we identified three SNPs with possible biological relevance: rs35870000 (within FREM1), which may be involved in IgE- and IL5-induced changes in airway smooth muscle cell responsiveness; rs10426116 (within ZNF284), a zinc finger protein, which has been implicated in asthma and BDR previously; and rs4782614 (near ATP2C2), involved in calcium transmembrane transport. Validation in paediatric cohorts yielded no significant SNPs, possibly due to age-genotype interaction effects.

Conclusion

Ancestry-stratified and ancestry-combined GWAS meta-analyses of over 14 000 participants did not identify genetic variants associated with BDR at the genome-wide significance threshold, although a less stringent threshold identified three variants showing suggestive evidence of association. A common definition and protocol for measuring BDR in research may improve future efforts to identify variants associated with BDR.

Predicting treatable traits for long-acting bronchodilators in patients with stable COPD

Purpose

There is currently no measure to predict a treatability of long-acting β-2 agonist (LABA) or long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed to build prediction models for the treatment response to these bronchodilators, in order to determine the most responsive medication for patients with COPD.

Methods

We performed a prospective open-label crossover study, in which each long-acting bronchodilator was given in a random order to 65 patients with stable COPD for 4 weeks, with a 4-week washout period in between. We analyzed 14 baseline clinical traits, expression profiles of 31,426 gene transcripts, and damaged-gene scores of 6,464 genes acquired from leukocytes. The gene expression profiles were measured by RNA microarray and the damaged-gene scores were obtained after DNA exome sequencing. Linear regression analyses were performed to build prediction models after using factor and correlation analyses.

Results

Using a prediction model for a LABA, traits found associated with the treatment response were post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second, bronchodilator reversibility (BDR) to salbutamol, expression of three genes (CLN8, PCSK5, and SKP2), and damage scores of four genes (EPG5, FNBP4, SCN10A, and SPTBN5) (R²=0.512, p<0.001). Traits associated with the treatment response to a LAMA were COPD assessment test score, BDR, expression of four genes (C1orf115, KIAA1618, PRKX, and RHOQ) and damage scores of three genes (FBN3, FDFT1, and ZBED6) (R²=0.575, p<0.001). The prediction models consisting only of clinical traits appeared too weak to predict the treatment response, with R²=0.231 for the LABA model and R²=0.121 for the LAMA model.

Conclusion

Adding the expressions of genes and damaged-gene scores to the clinical traits may improve the predictability of treatment response to long-acting bronchodilators.

Airflow limitation as a risk factor for low bone mineral density and hip fracture

AIM

To investigate whether airflow limitation is associated with bone mineral density (BMD) and risk of hip fractures.

METHODS

A community sample of 5,100 subjects 47-48 and 71-73 years old and living in Bergen was invited. Participants filled in questionnaires and performed a post-bronchodilator spirometry measuring forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC). All attendants were invited to have a BMD measurement of the hip. During 10 years of follow-up, information on death was collected from the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry, and incident hip fractures were registered from regional hospital records of discharge diagnoses and surgical procedure codes.

RESULTS

The attendance rate was 69% (n=3,506). The prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (FEV1/FVC<0.7) was 9%. In multiple logistic regression, the lowest quartile of BMD versus the three upper was significantly predicted by FEV1/FVC<0.7 and FEV1% predicted (odds ratio [OR]: 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11 to 2.25, and OR per increase of 10%: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86 to 0.99, respectively). Hip fracture occurred in 126 (4%) participants. In a Cox regression analysis, FEV1% predicted was associated with a lowered risk of hip fracture (hazard ratio per increase of 10%: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.79 to 0.997).

CONCLUSION

Airflow limitation is positively associated with low BMD and risk of hip fracture in middle-aged and elderly.

Improved criterion for assessing lung function reversibility

BACKGROUND

Consensus on how best to express bronchodilator reversibility (BDR) is lacking. We tested different BDR criteria against the null hypotheses that BDR should show no sex or size bias. To determine the best criterion for defining BDR, we hypothesized that clinically important BDR should be associated with better survival in respiratory patients compared with that of patients without BDR.

METHODS

We used the first BDR test of 4,231 patients who had known subsequent survival status (50.8% male sex; mean age, 60.9 years; mean survival, 5.2 years [range, 0.1-16.5 years]). BDR for FEV1 was expressed as absolute change, % baseline change, and change as % predicted FEV1.

RESULTS

Having BDR defined from absolute change was biased toward men (male to female ratio, 2.70) and toward those with larger baseline FEV1. BDR defined by % change from baseline was biased toward those with lower baseline values. BDR defined by % predicted had no sex or size bias. Multivariate Cox regression found those with FEV1 BDR > 8% predicted (33% of the subjects) had an optimal survival advantage (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45-0.69) compared with those with FEV1 BDR ≤ 8% predicted. The survival of those with FEV1 BDR > 8% predicted was not significantly different from that of those with FEV1 BDR > 14% predicted but was significantly better than that of those with FEV1 BDR < 0.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that expressing FEV1 BDR as % predicted avoids sex and size bias. FEV1 BDR > 8% predicted showed optimal survival advantage and may be the most appropriate criterion to define clinically important reversibility.

Asthma Pharmacogenomics: 2015 Update

There is evidence that genetic factors are implicated in the observed differences in therapeutic responses to the common classes of asthma therapy such as β2-agonists, corticosteroids, and leukotriene modifiers. Pharmacogenomics explores the roles of genetic variation in drug response and continues to be a field of great interest in asthma therapy. Prior studies have focused on candidate genes and recently emphasized genome-wide association analyses. Newer integrative omics and system-level approaches have recently revealed novel understanding of drug response pathways. However, the current known genetic loci only account for a fraction of variability in drug response and ongoing research is needed. While the field of asthma pharmacogenomics is not yet fully translatable to clinical practice, ongoing research should hopefully achieve this goal in the near future buttressed by the recent precision medicine efforts in the USA and worldwide.

Validity of a questionnaire-based diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a general population-based study

Background

The diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is based on airflow obstruction. In epidemiological studies, spirometric data have often been lacking and researchers have had to rely almost solely on questionnaire answers. The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of questionnaire answers to detect COPD.

Methods

A sample of the Swedish general population without physician-diagnosed asthma was randomly selected and interviewed using a respiratory questionnaire. All eligible subjects aged 25–75 years (n = 3892) performed spirometry for detection of airflow obstruction using Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) or American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) were calculated to define diagnostic accuracy of questionnaire answers.

Results

The sensitivity of the question “Have you been diagnosed by a physician as having COPD or emphysema?” in detecting airflow obstruction was 5.7% using GOLD, and 9.8% using ATS/ERS, criteria; specificity was 99.7% for GOLD and 99.5% for ATS/ERS. Sensitivity, specificity, and PPV were higher for the question compared to self-reported symptoms of chronic bronchitis in identifying subjects with airflow obstruction.

Conclusions

The high specificity and good PPV suggest that the question “Have you been diagnosed by a physician as having COPD or emphysema?” is more likely to identify those who do not have airflow obstruction, whereas the low sensitivity of this question could underestimate the real burden of COPD in the general population.

Gene-based association identifies SPATA13-AS1 as a pharmacogenomic predictor of inhaled short-acting beta-agonist response in multiple population groups

Inhaled short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) medication is commonly used in asthma patients to rapidly reverse airway obstruction and improve acute symptoms. We performed a genome wide association study of SABA medication response using gene-based association tests. A linear mixed model approach was first used for SNP associations, and results were later combined using GATES to generate gene-based associations. Our results identified SPATA13-AS1 as being significantly associated with SABA bronchodilator response in 328 healthy African Americans. In replication, this gene was associated with SABA response among 2 separate groups of African Americans with asthma (n=1,073, p=0.011 and n=1,968, p=0.014), 149 healthy African Americans (p=0.003), and 556 European Americans with asthma (p=0.041). SPATA13-AS1 was also associated with longitudinal SABA medication usage in 2 separate groups of African Americans with asthma (n=658, p=0.047 and n=1,968, p=0.025). Future studies are needed to delineate the precise mechanism by which SPATA13-AS1 may influence SABA response.

Worldwide patterns of bronchodilator responsiveness: results from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study

RATIONALE

Criteria for a clinically significant bronchodilator response (BDR) are mainly based on studies in patients with obstructive lung diseases. Little is known about the BDR in healthy general populations, and even less about the worldwide patterns.

METHODS

10 360 adults aged 40 years and older from 14 countries in North America, Europe, Africa and Asia participated in the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study. Spirometry was used before and after an inhaled bronchodilator to determine the distribution of the BDR in population-based samples of healthy non-smokers and individuals with airflow obstruction.

RESULTS

In 3922 healthy never smokers, the weighted pooled estimate of the 95th percentiles (95% CI) for bronchodilator response were 284 ml (263 to 305) absolute change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s from baseline (ΔFEV(1)); 12.0% (11.2% to 12.8%) change relative to initial value (%ΔFEV(1i)); and 10.0% (9.5% to 10.5%) change relative to predicted value (%ΔFEV(1p)). The corresponding mean changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) were 322 ml (271 to 373) absolute change from baseline (ΔFVC); 10.5% (8.9% to 12.0%) change relative to initial value (ΔFVC(i)); and 9.2% (7.9% to 10.5%) change relative to predicted value (ΔFVC(p)). The proportion who exceeded the above threshold values in the subgroup with spirometrically defined Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage 2 and higher (FEV(1)/FVC <0.7 and FEV(1)% predicted <80%) were 11.1%, 30.8% and 12.9% respectively for the FEV(1)-based thresholds and 22.6%, 28.6% and 22.1% respectively for the FVC-based thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide reference values for bronchodilator responses worldwide that confirm guideline estimates for a clinically significant level of BDR in bronchodilator testing.

Genetic association analysis of COPD candidate genes with bronchodilator responsiveness

Airflow limitation in COPD patients is not fully reversible. However, there may be large variability in bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) among COPD patients, and familial aggregation of BDR suggests a genetic component. Therefore, we investigated the association between six candidate genes and BDR in subjects with severe COPD. A total of 389 subjects from the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) were analyzed. Bronchodilator responsiveness to albuterol was expressed in three ways: absolute change in FEV(1), change in FEV(1) as a percent of baseline FEV(1), and change in FEV(1) as a percent of predicted FEV(1). Genotyping was completed for 122 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in six candidate genes (EPHX1, SFTPB, TGFB1, SERPINE2, GSTP1, ADRB2). Associations between BDR phenotypes and SNP genotypes were tested using linear regression, adjusting for age, sex, pack-years of smoking, and height. Genes associated with BDR phenotypes in the NETT subjects were assessed for replication in 127 pedigrees from the Boston Early-Onset COPD (EOCOPD) Study. Three SNPs in EPHX1 (p=0.009-0.04), three SNPs in SERPINE2 (p=0.004-0.05) and two SNPs in ADRB2 (0.04-0.05) were significantly associated with BDR phenotypes in NETT subjects. One SNP in EPHX1 (rs1009668, p=0.04) was significantly replicated in EOCOPD subjects. SNPs in SFTPB, TGFB1, and GSTP1 genes were not associated with BDR. In conclusion, a polymorphism of EPHX1 was associated with bronchodilator responsiveness phenotypes in subjects with severe COPD.

Duration of salmeterol-induced bronchodilation in mechanically ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a prospective clinical study

INTRODUCTION

Delivery of bronchodilators with a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) and a spacer device in mechanically ventilated patients has become a widespread practice. However, except for the short-acting beta2-agonist salbutamol, the duration of action of other bronchodilators, including long-acting beta2-agonists, delivered with this technique is not well established. The purpose of this study was to examine the duration of bronchodilation induced by the long-acting beta2-agonist salmeterol administered with an MDI and a spacer in a group of mechanically ventilated patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

Ten mechanically ventilated patients with acute exacerbation of COPD received four puffs of salmeterol (25 microg/puff). Salmeterol was administered with an MDI adapted to the inspiratory limb of the ventilator circuit using an aerosol cloud enhance spacer. Static and dynamic airway pressures, minimum (Rint) and maximum (Rrs) inspiratory resistance, and the difference between Rrs and Rint (DeltaR) were measured before and at 15, 30, and 60 minutes as well as at 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after salmeterol administration. The overall effects of salmeterol on respiratory system mechanics and heart rate during the 12-hour study period were analyzed by nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

Salmeterol caused a significant decrease in dynamic and static airway pressures, Rint, and Rrs. These changes were evident at 30 minutes and remained significant for 8 hours after salmeterol administration. The duration of bronchodilation varied significantly among patients, lasting in some patients more than 10 hours and wearing off in others in less than 6 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that four puffs of salmeterol delivered with an MDI and a spacer device induces significant bronchodilation in mechanically ventilated patients with COPD exacerbation, the duration of which is highly variable, precluding definite conclusions in regard to optimum dosing schedules.

Population pharmacodynamic model of bronchodilator response to inhaled albuterol in children and adults with asthma

BACKGROUND

Because interpatient variability in bronchodilation from inhaled albuterol is large and clinically important, we characterized the albuterol dose/response relationship by pharmacodynamic modeling and quantified variability.

METHODS

Eighty-one patients with asthma (24% African American [AA]; 8 to 65 years old; baseline FEV1, 40 to 80% of predicted) received 180 microg of albuterol from a metered-dose inhaler (MDI), and then 90 microg every 15 min until maximum improvement or 540 microg was administered; all then received 2.5 mg of nebulized albuterol. FEV1 was measured 15 min after each dose. The population cumulative dose/response data were fitted with a sigmoid maximum effect of albuterol (Emax) [maximum percentage of predicted FEV1 effect] model by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The influence of covariates on maximum percentage of predicted FEV1 reached after albuterol administration (Rmax) and cumulative dose of albuterol required to bring about 50% of maximum effect of albuterol (ED50) and differences between AA and white patients were explored.

RESULTS

ED50 was 141 microg, and Emax was 24.0%. Coefficients of variation for ED50 and Emax were 40% and 56%, respectively. Ethnicity was a statistically significant covariate (p < 0.05). AA and white patients reached 82.4% and 91.9% of predicted FEV1, respectively (p = 0.0004); and absolute improvement in percentage of predicted FEV1 was 16.6% in AA patients vs 26.7% in white patients (p < 0.0003). There were no baseline characteristic differences between AA and white patients. Nebulized albuterol increased FEV1 > or = 200 mL in 21% of participants. Heart rate and BP were unchanged from baseline after maximal albuterol doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model predicts that 180 microg of albuterol by MDI produces a 14.4% increase in percentage of predicted FEV1 over baseline (11.7% in AA patients, and 17.5% in white patients). Emax varies widely between asthmatic patients. AA patients are less responsive to maximal doses of inhaled albuterol than white patients.

The forgotten message from gold: FVC is a primary clinical outcome measure of bronchodilator reversibility in COPD

BACKGROUND

The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) recommends the use of forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) to assess airways reversibility. The American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) recommend FEV(1) and/or forced vital capacity (FVC). This study assessed whether FVC detects reversibility in more chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients than FEV(1) after acute short-acting bronchodilator inhalation.

METHODS

Plethysmographic data of 168 consecutive stable male COPD patients who underwent reversibility testing were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients showed a clinically significant increase in FVC, whereas only 49 patients showed a clinically significant increase in FEV(1). Thus, FVC detected reversibility in 57% more patients than FEV(1). Of the 90 patients showing clinically significant reversibility, FEV(1) did not detect 41 patients that FVC detected, indicating a 45% difference.

CONCLUSION

FEV(1) underestimates acute bronchodilation effects. FVC should thus be a primary clinical outcome measure of bronchodilator reversibility in COPD, as it detects reversibility in more patients. This message, forgotten by GOLD, should be promoted in future consensus statements.

FEV1 response to bronchodilation in an adult urban population

BACKGROUND

Most studies evaluating bronchodilation in flow-volume spirometry have been conducted in patients with obstructive airways diseases, but less is known about bronchodilation responses in the general population or in healthy subjects.

METHODS

We evaluated an urban population sample of 628 adults (260 men, 368 women) aged 25 to 74 years with flow-volume spirometry using inhalation of 0.4 mg of a salbutamol aerosol with a spacer device for bronchodilation. On the basis of a structured interview, a subgroup of 219 healthy, asymptomatic nonsmokers was selected.

RESULTS

In the population sample, the average increase in FEV(1) from baseline after salbutamol inhalation was 77.2 mL (SD, 109.7 mL) or 2.5% (SD, 3.9%). In healthy asymptomatic nonsmokers, the mean change in FEV(1) was 62.0 mL (SD, 89.7 mL) or 1.8% (SD, 2.6%). In the whole population, the 95th percentile limit of the increase in FEV(1) was 8.5%, while it was 5.9% among healthy asymptomatic nonsmokers. The absolute change in FEV(1) correlated significantly with baseline FVC (p < 0.01). The FEV(1)/FVC ratio at baseline was the strongest influencing factor for the bronchodilation response.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that a significant increase in FEV(1) from baseline in a bronchodilation test is around 9% in an urban population. The level of the significant absolute increase in FEV(1) seems to depend on FVC. Low baseline FEV(1)/FVC ratio, reflecting airflow limitation, is the strongest determinant for FEV(1) response to bronchodilation.

β 2 -Adrenergic Receptor Genetic Polymorphisms and Short-term Bronchodilator Responses in Patients With COPD

BACKGROUND

COPD is characterized by a persistent airflow limitation that is not fully reversible; thus, the reversibility of airflow limitations in response to a bronchodilator is an important component of COPD. Several studies have established that two common nonsynonymous polymorphisms in the beta2-adrenergic receptor gene (ADRB2), Arg16Gly and Gln27Glu, have important effects in modulating responses to beta2-agonists; however, the effects of these polymorphisms on responses to beta2-agonists in patients with COPD is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether different genotypes at these two polymorphisms are related to differential responses to inhaled beta2-agonists in patients with COPD.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 246 patients with COPD who were participants in a longitudinal study of COPD (ie, the Hokkaido COPD cohort study) were studied. We compared short-term bronchodilator responses (BDRs) to salbutamol according to ADRB2 genotypes at codons 16 and 27.

RESULTS

The presence of the Arg16 allele was associated with lower BDRs to beta2-agonist inhalation. The mean (+/-SD) log (postbronchodilator FEV1-prebronchodilator FEV1) values of Gly16 homozygotes (n=65), Arg16Gly16 heterozygotes (n=106), and Arg16 homozygotes (n=75) were 2.19+/-0.43, 2.09+/-0.42, and 2.01+/-0.42, respectively (p<0.05). The genetic effects of the Arg16Gly polymorphism were independent of the severity of airflow limitation, age, and smoking status. The most common Arg16-Gln27 haplotype was also significantly associated with decreased BDRs to salbutamol (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The genetic effects of ADRB2 gene polymorphisms may explain some of the variability in response to therapeutic doses of a short-acting beta2-agonists in patients with COPD.

Impact of bronchodilator use on the prevalence of COPD in population-based samples

The aim of this study was to describe the impact of using bronchodilators on the prevalence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a population-based survey (Platino study). A cluster sampling of subjects 40 years of age or older, representative of the metropolitan areas of 5 Latin American cities (Sao Paulo, Mexico, Montevideo, Santiago and Caracas) was chosen. Spirometry according to ATS standards was done before and after inhalation of 200 micrograms of salbutamol in 5183 subjects. Prevalences of airflow obstruction were estimated using different criteria, in tests done before and after bronchodilator use, and with reference values for pre- or post-bronchodilator use. Bronchodilator testing reduced the overall prevalence of FEV(1)/FVC% < 0.70 from 21.7% to 14% (35%). In the group with FEV(1)/FVC < 0.70 after bronchodilator use, 21% were asymptomatic from the respiratory point of view, and lacked significant adverse exposures. Subjects below the 5th percentile for FEV(1)/FVC and FEV(1)/FEV(6) were fewer than those with FEV(1)/FVC < 0.70, especially among the elderly. More subjects are below the 5th percentile of FEV(1)/FVC and FEV(1)/FEV(6) using reference values for tests after bronchodilator use than using the reference values determined without bronchodilator testing. Testing after bronchodilator use reduces the prevalence of airflow obstruction from 32 to 39% depending on the definition used. In addition, the subjects who were still obstructed after bronchodilator use were the ones who showed more respiratory symptoms and exposure to tobacco and other smokes and dusts, than subjects with reversible obstruction, suggesting an increased specificity for COPD.