Benefit of adjunctive tacrolimus in connective tissue disease-interstitial lung disease

Review of Pulmonary Manifestations in Antisynthetase Syndrome

Antisynthetase syndrome (ASyS) is now a widely recognized entity within the spectrum of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Initially described in patients with a triad of myositis, arthritis, and interstitial lung disease (ILD), its presentation can be diverse. Additional common symptoms experienced by patients with ASyS include Raynaud's phenomenon, mechanic's hand, and fever. Although there is a significant overlap with polymyositis and dermatomyositis, the key distinction lies in the presence of antisynthetase antibodies (ASAs). Up to 10 ASAs have been identified to correlate with a presentation of ASyS, each having manifestations that may slightly differ from others. Despite the proposal of three classification criteria to aid diagnosis, the heterogeneous nature of patient presentations poses challenges. ILD confers a significant burden in patients with ASyS, sometimes manifesting in isolation. Notably, ILD is also often the initial presentation of ASyS, requiring pulmonologists to remain vigilant for an accurate diagnosis. This article will comprehensively review the various aspects of ASyS, including disease presentation, diagnosis, management, and clinical course, with a primary focus on its pulmonary manifestations.

Methotrexate, leflunomide and tacrolimus use and the progression of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between MTX, LEF and tacrolimus use and the progression of RA-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD).

METHODS

The Korean RA-ILD cohort prospectively enrolled patients with RA-associated ILD at multiple centres from 2015 to 2018 and followed up with them for 3 years. ILD progression was defined by any of the followings: a decrease of ≥10% in forced vital capacity, a decrease of ≥15% in the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, or death from respiratory failure.

RESULTS

Of 143 patients, 64 patients experienced ILD progression during a median follow-up period of 33 months. The use of MTX [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.06; 95% CI, 0.59, 1.89], LEF (aHR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.88, 3.46) and tacrolimus (aHR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.52, 1.72) did not increase the risk of ILD progression. However, the association between LEF use and the risk of ILD progression was significant in subgroups with poor lung function (aHR, 8.42; 95% CI, 2.61, 27.15). Older age, male sex, a shorter RA duration, higher RA disease activity and extensive disease at baseline were independently associated with ILD progression.

CONCLUSION

None of the three treatments increased the risk of RA-associated ILD progression, except for LEF, which increased the risk of ILD progression in patients with severe ILD. The appropriate use of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs considering RA disease activity and ILD severity would be important for the management of RA-associated ILD.

Diagnosis and Management of Myositis-Associated Lung Disease

Although interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with inflammatory myopathies, the current definition and diagnostic criteria of autoimmune myositis remain inadequate to capture the large proportion of patients with lung-dominant disease. As a result, these patients present unique diagnostic and treatment challenges for even the most experienced clinicians. This article highlights the emerging role of autoantibodies in the diagnosis, classification, and management of patients with ILD. We propose alternative nomenclature to facilitate research on this unique patient population. Additionally, evidence supporting the various therapies used in the treatment of myositis-associated ILD is reviewed. The classification and treatment of patients with myositis-associated ILD remains challenging. A standardized therapeutic approach to these patients is lacking, and prospective studies in the field are needed to determine optimal treatment regimens.

Clinically Relevant Biomarkers in Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) complicates connective tissue disease (CTD) with variable incidence and is a leading cause of death in these patients. To improve CTD-ILD outcomes, early recognition and management of ILD is critical. Blood-based and radiologic biomarkers that assist in the diagnosis CTD-ILD have long been studied. Recent studies, including -omic investigations, have also begun to identify biomarkers that may help prognosticate such patients. This review provides an overview of clinically relevant biomarkers in patients with CTD-ILD, highlighting recent advances to assist in the diagnosis and prognostication of CTD-ILD.

Connective Tissue Disease Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

Connective tissue disease associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) is a heterogenous collection of conditions with a diverse spectrum of interstitial lung disease (ILD) manifestations. Currently, clinical practice of lung-directed immunosuppression in CTD-ILD is supported by several randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with scleroderma and several observational, retrospective studies in other autoimmune conditions. However, given the harm of immunosuppression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, there is an urgent need for RCTs of immunosuppression and antifibrotic agents in fibrotic CTD-ILD populations as well as the study of intervention in patients with subclinical CTD-ILD.

Effectiveness of tacrolimus concomitant with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and tolerance of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) therapy administered concomitantly with tacrolimus (TAC) treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

2792 patients who underwent therapy with five bDMARDs (etanercept: ETN, adalimumab, golimumab, tocilizumab, and abatacept: ABT) were enrolled. Among the study subjects, 1582 were concomitant methotrexate (MTX group), 147 were concomitant TAC (TAC group), and 1063 were non-concomitant MTX and TAC (non-MTX/TAC group). The primary outcome was the incident rate of discontinuation of bDMARDs by adverse events (AEs) or loss of efficacy.

RESULTS

Concerning the analysis for each reasons of discontinuation, including AEs and loss of efficacy, the hazards ratio (HR) was significantly lower in the TAC group than in non-MTX/TAC groups (AEs: HR = 0.39, 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.68, loss of efficacy: HR = 0.49, 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.78). The loss of efficacy with the use of ETN and ABT was lower in the TAC group than in non-MTX/TAC groups. Concomitant TAC did not induce elevated risk for discontinuation of AEs in all bDMARD analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant TAC with ABT or ETN showed higher retention rates than bDMARDs therapy without TAC or MTX. AEs did not increase over long-term observation.

The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus on top of glucocorticoids in the management of IIM-ILD: A retrospective and prospective study

Objective

To examine the efficacy of tacrolimus on top of glucocorticoids (GCs) in the management of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies-associated interstitial lung disease (IIM-ILD) and further assess the therapeutic benefit and safety of low-dose pirfenidone followed above treatments.

Methods

The retrospective study comprised 250 patients with IIM-ILD hospitalized in Tongji Hospital from 2014 to 2020. Demographic data, survival outcomes, and recurrence rates over the 1-year follow-up period were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into two groups based on treatment with tacrolimus alone or other conventional immunosuppressants. Endpoints were compared by adjusted Cox regression model using inverse probability of treatment weighting to minimize treatment bias and potential confounders. For the prospective study, IIM-ILD patients treated with tacrolimus alone or tacrolimus combined with low-dose pirfenidone were enrolled from 2018 to 2020. Clinical characteristics, survival outcomes and multifarious assessment scales were followed up at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. The primary endpoint was 12-month survival rate and the secondary endpoints included respiratory-related events, adverse events, exacerbation in HRCT findings and laboratory parameters during therapy courses, and changes in respiratory function.

Results

For the retrospective study, tacrolimus group (n=93) had a significantly higher survival rate (weighted HR=0.330, p=0.002) and a lower relapse rate (weighted HR=0.548, p=0.003) compared with patients treated with other types of immunosuppressant (n=157) after adjustment. The prospectively enrolled 34 IIM-ILD patients were treated with tacrolimus (n=12) or tacrolimus combined with low-dose pirfenidone (n=22). After 12 months of treatment with tacrolimus, patients in the prospective cohort showed significant improvements in cardio-pulmonary function, disease activity, muscle strength, and mental scale from baseline. Subgroup analysis indicated that patients with tacrolimus and pirfenidone combination therapy showed lower chest HRCT scores (p=0.021) and lower respiratory-related relapse rates than those in tacrolimus monotherapy group (log-rank p=0.0029). The incidence rate of drug-associated adverse events (AEs) was comparable between two groups and none of the patients discontinued the treatment due to severe AEs.

Conclusion

Tacrolimus is well-tolerated and effective in the treatment of IIM-ILD. Furthermore, low-dose pirfenidone add-on treatment seems result in favorable improvements in pulmonary involvements for IIM-ILD patients.

Clinical Trial Registration

http://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2100043595.

Tacrolimus in Patients With Interstitial Pneumonia Associated With Polymyositis or Dermatomyositis: Interim Report of Postmarketing Surveillance in Japan

OBJECTIVE

The calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus has been approved in Japan for the treatment of interstitial pneumonia (IP) in patients with polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM). Postmarketing surveillance was initiated to examine long-term outcomes of immunosuppressive regimens containing tacrolimus in real-world settings.

METHODS

Observational, prospective, postmarketing surveillance is ongoing in 179 patients with PM/DM-associated IP initiating treatment with tacrolimus. We report interim findings after 2 years of follow-up. Cumulative overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Potential prognostic factors for mortality were assessed by univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 170 patients were included in this analysis. At the time of starting treatment with tacrolimus, almost all patients were receiving corticosteroids (98.8%), and cyclophosphamide was additionally used in 42 patients (24.7%). Forty-nine patients (28.8%) discontinued tacrolimus during follow-up, mainly due to loss to follow-up, patient death, and adverse events. Mean (SD) oral corticosteroid dose decreased from 32.4 (21.6) mg/day at baseline to 7.6 (4.2) mg/day at 2 years. Overall survival at 2 years was 90.3%; corresponding progression-free survival was 62.5%. Factors found to be associated with all-cause mortality included diagnosis of clinically amyopathic DM (hazard ratio [HR] 9.04, 95% CI 1.18-69.51 vs PM), ferritin level 500 to < 1500 ng/mL (HR 8.61, 95% CI 2.51-29.45 vs < 500 ng/mL), and presence of antimelanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibodies (HR 8.16, 95% CI 1.03-64.47 vs absence).

CONCLUSION

Immunosuppressive regimens containing tacrolimus appear useful for the management of IP in patients with PM/DM. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02159651].

Combination therapy of tacrolimus, high doses of glucocorticosteroids, and cyclophosphamide against existing historical treatment for patients in severe conditions of interstitial lung diseases complicated with dermatomyositis: A retrospective analysis

The high-dose glucocorticosteroid (GC) treatment is the first choice for dermatomyositis complicated with interstitial lung disease (DM-ILD) but patients are resistant to the high-dose GC monotherapy. Besides, the high dose of GC, the secondary immunosuppressive agent(s) is necessary but there is controversy for the selection of immunosuppressive agent(s). The objectives of the study were to analyze the efficacy of different therapeutic options for DM-ILD to identify the optimal therapy. A total of 60 patients had received intravenous 1.0-2.0 mg/ kg/day prednisolone for DM-ILD. In severe conditions, patients had received oral 1 to 3 mg/day tacrolimus (TAC), 500 mg/ m2/month cyclophosphamide (CY), and/or 1 g/ day methylprednisolone pulse (TI cohort, n = 24). In severe conditions, patients had received 1 g/day methylprednisolone pulse and 2-3 mg/ kg/day cyclosporine A (CsA) and/or 500 mg/ m2/month CY (existing historical treatment; CT cohort, n = 36). Patients of the TI cohort did not receive CsA. Patients in the CT cohort were received CY in significantly fewer numbers than those of the TI cohort during treatment (P = .0112). A total of 11 (46%) patients from the TI cohort and 14 (39%) patients from the CT cohort were developed relapsed. At the end of the 30-months, higher numbers of patients of the TI cohort had an event(s) free survival than those of the CT cohort (7 (29%) vs 2 (6%), P = .0229). Also, higher numbers of patients of the TI cohort had survived irrespective of an event(s) than those of the CT cohort (21 (87%) vs 22 (61%), P = .0399). Patients of the TI cohort had developed herpes zoster (2 (8%)) and cytomegalovirus (4 (17%)) infections. Patients of the CT cohort developed renal dysfunction (10 (28%)). Hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and fracture (GC-related toxicities) were also reported in both cohorts and these toxicities were fever in the TI cohort. The addition of TAC to high doses GC with CY is an ideal treatment for severe conditions of DM-ILD (Level of Evidence: III; Technical Efficacy Stage: 4).

Thoracic Involvement in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: Pathogenesis and Management

Thoracic involvement is one of the main determinants of morbidity and mortality in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs), with different prevalence and manifestations according to the underlying disease. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most common pulmonary complication, particularly in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Other thoracic manifestations include pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), mostly in patients with SSc, airway disease, mainly in RA, and pleural involvement, which is common in systemic lupus erythematosus and RA, but rare in other ARDs.In this review, we summarize and critically discuss the current knowledge on thoracic involvement in ARDs, with emphasis on disease pathogenesis and management. Immunosuppression is the mainstay of therapy, particularly for ARDs-ILD, but it should be reserved to patients with clinically significant disease or at risk of progressive disease. Therefore, a thorough, multidisciplinary assessment to determine disease activity and degree of impairment is required to optimize patient management. Nevertheless, the management of thoracic involvement-particularly ILD-is challenging due to the heterogeneity of disease pathogenesis, the variety of patterns of interstitial pneumonia and the paucity of randomized controlled clinical trials of pharmacological intervention. Further studies are needed to better understand the pathogenesis of these conditions, which in turn is instrumental to the development of more efficacious therapies.

Prediction of long-term mortality by using machine learning models in Chinese patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease

Background

The exact risk assessment is crucial for the management of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) patients. In the present study, we develop a nomogram to predict 3‑ and 5-year mortality by using machine learning approach and test the ILD-GAP model in Chinese CTD-ILD patients.

Methods

CTD-ILD patients who were diagnosed and treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were enrolled based on a prior well-designed criterion between February 2011 and July 2018. Cox regression with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to screen out the predictors and generate a nomogram. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling. Then, the nomogram and ILD-GAP model were assessed via likelihood ratio testing, Harrell’s C index, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), the net reclassification improvement (NRI) and decision curve analysis.

Results

A total of 675 consecutive CTD-ILD patients were enrolled in this study, during the median follow-up period of 50 (interquartile range, 38–65) months, 158 patients died (mortality rate 23.4%). After feature selection, 9 variables were identified: age, rheumatoid arthritis, lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, right ventricular diameter, right atrial area, honeycombing, immunosuppressive agents, aspartate transaminase and albumin. A predictive nomogram was generated by integrating these variables, which provided better mortality estimates than ILD-GAP model based on the likelihood ratio testing, Harrell’s C index (0.767 and 0.652 respectively) and calibration plots. Application of the nomogram resulted in an improved IDI (3- and 5-year, 0.137 and 0.136 respectively) and NRI (3- and 5-year, 0.294 and 0.325 respectively) compared with ILD-GAP model. In addition, the nomogram was more clinically useful revealed by decision curve analysis.

Conclusions

The results from our study prove that the ILD-GAP model may exhibit an inapplicable role in predicting mortality risk in Chinese CTD-ILD patients. The nomogram we developed performed well in predicting 3‑ and 5-year mortality risk of Chinese CTD-ILD patients, but further studies and external validation will be required to determine the clinical usefulness of the nomogram.

Pulmonary histopathology of interstitial lung disease associated with antisynthetase antibodies

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine if antibody type is an indicator of pulmonary histopathology, using antisynthetase antibody positive interstitial lung disease (ILD) cases with lung biopsy or autopsy findings.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of the English language literature in PubMed to identify ILD histopathology results for cases with antibodies against anti-aminoacyl-transfer RNA (tRNA) synthetases (anti-ARS antibodies), including Jo1, PL-12, PL-7, KS, ES, and OJ. We additionally identified patients who had ILD, anti-ARS antibodies, and a lung biopsy between 2015 and 2020 at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. For each case, we documented the specific anti-ARS antibody and major histopathologic patterns identified on biopsy or autopsy, including usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), organizing pneumonia (OP), and acute lung injury (ALI). To determine if histopathology varied by antibody type, we compared the proportion of each of four major patterns by antibody type using the Fisher's Exact test.

RESULTS

We identified 310 cases with pathology findings and anti-ARS antibody positivity, including 12 cases from our institution. The proportion of NSIP differed significantly across antibody type, found in 31% of Jo1 (p < 0.01), 67% of EJ (p < 0.01), and 63% of KS (p < 0.01) cases. OP was common in Jo1 (23%, p = 0.07), but rare in EJ (4%, p = 0.04) and KS (4%, p = 0.04). UIP was common in PL-12 alone (36%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The frequency of histopathologic findings in ILD with anti-ARS positivity varies significantly by antibody type, and NSIP occurs in less than half of all cases.

Inflammatory myopathies: shedding light on promising agents and combination therapies in clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Due to new insights into the pathogenesis of inflammatory myopathies - in short myositis - and the urgent need for new treatment options in patients who are refractory to standard therapy, multiple novel drugs have been developed and studied in clinical trials. In light of this exciting development, a critical evaluation of the present data is necessary in order to identify the best pathway to future treatment of inflammatory myopathies.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the current evidence from clinical trials in myositis and encompasses dermatomyositis, polymyositis, necrotizing myopathy, antisynthetase-syndrome, overlap myositis, and inclusion body myositis. The results of studies on new therapeutic agents are summarized, in particular larger cohort studies and randomized trials from recent years. When such data were not available, earlier and smaller representative studies were included instead.

EXPERT OPINION

Current studies in most myositis subtypes have shown positive effects of novel biologicals such as abatacept, sifalimumab, JAK-Inhibitors as well as known agents such as rituximab, but further studies are needed to confirm these observations. In inclusion body myositis, the eagerly awaited recent therapeutic trials have missed their primary endpoints, except for the phase 2 study with rapamycin, which has demonstrated significant improvements in secondary endpoints. Future trials will also need to focus on combination therapies of multiple immunomodulatory agents.

Update on Myositis Therapy: from Today's Standards to Tomorrow's Possibilities

Inflammatory myopathies, in short, myositis, are heterogeneous disorders that are characterized by inflammation of skeletal muscle and weakness of arms and legs. Research over the past few years has led to a new understanding regarding the pathogenesis of myositis. The new insights include different pathways of the innate and adaptive immune response during the pathogenesis of myositis. The importance of non-inflammatory mechanisms such as cell stress and impaired autophagy has been recently described. New target-specific drugs for myositis have been developed and are currently being tested in clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of action of pharmacological standards in myositis and provide an outlook of future treatment approaches.

Antifibrotic Therapy: Is There a Role in Myositis-Interstitial Lung Disease?

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a cause of substantial morbidity and mortality amongst autoimmune diseases, including myositis. Despite first-line therapy with immunosuppression, many inflammatory ILDs advance to a fibrotic stage. In such patients, progressive fibrosis may be amenable to treatment with antifibrotic medications, which were initially studied and approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. We here review the available data that support the use of antifibrotics in connective tissue diseases and progressive fibrosing ILDs. There is now a growing body of evidence in both large randomized clinical trials and on the evolving pathophysiologic pathways to support the use of antifibrotics in select patients with autoimmune ILD and a fibrotic phenotype. Further study of antifibrotics in combination with immunosuppressive medications, and in the myositis-ILD population, is needed.

Anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease: report of two cases

Melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) antibody-positive dermatomyositis (DM) displays unique cutaneous and pathologic features. We describe two cases of myositis-associated rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD). The patients were two women from Kerala, India. Both patients had anti-MDA5 antibody-positive myositis. Both patients presented with RP-ILD without any clinical features of myositis and succumbed to their illness despite aggressive medical treatment. Anti-MDA5-antibody-positive DM is characterised by amyopathic disease with rapidly progressive and fatal ILD.

Antisynthetase syndrome: A distinct disease spectrum

The discovery of novel autoantibodies related to idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (collectively referred to as myositis) has not only advanced our understanding of the clinical, serological, and pathological correlation in the disease spectrum but also played a role in guiding management and prognosis. One group of the myositis-specific autoantibodies is anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (anti-ARS or anti-synthetase) which defines a syndrome with predominant interstitial lung disease, arthritis, and myositis. Autoantibodies to eight aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases have been identified with anti-Jo1 the most common in all of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Disease presentation and prognosis vary depending on which anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase antibody is present. In this review, we will discuss the clinical characteristics, overlap features with other autoimmune diseases, prognostic factors, and management of the antisynthetase syndrome.

Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Evaluation and Management

Interstitial lung disease is common among patients with connective tissue disease and is an important contributor to morbidity and mortality. Infection and drug toxicity must always be excluded as the cause of radiographic findings. Immunosuppression remains a mainstay of therapy despite few controlled trials supporting its use. When a decision regarding therapy initiation is made, considerations include an assessment of disease severity as well as a determination of the rate of progression. Because patients may have extrathoracic disease activity, a multidisciplinary approach is crucial and should include supportive and nonpharmacologic management strategies.

Recognition and Management of Myositis-Associated Rapidly Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are autoimmune processes that are characterized by skeletal muscle inflammation. The lung is the most commonly involved extramuscular organ, and, when present, pulmonary disease drives morbidity and mortality. A subset of patients can present with rapidly progressive hypoxemic respiratory failure due to myositis-related interstitial lung disease. Confirmatory autoantibody testing requires sending samples to a reference laboratory; thus, diagnosis of rapidly progressive myositis-associated interstitial lung disease relies on a high index of suspicion and careful history and physical examination. Although the cornerstone of therapy for these patients remains multimodality immunosuppression, emerging data support a role for advanced therapies (including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and lung transplantation) in appropriately selected patients. It is hoped that greater awareness of the clinical features of this syndrome will allow for appropriate diagnosis and treatment of these potentially treatable patients, as well as raise awareness of the need for multicenter collaboration to prospectively study how to manage this complex disease.

Current and Emerging Drug Therapies for Connective Tissue Disease-Interstitial Lung Disease (CTD-ILD)

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) can be associated with all connective tissue diseases and is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The management of connective tissue disease-interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) is challenging due substantial heterogeneity in disease behaviour and paucity of controlled clinical trials to guide treating clinicians. Not all patients require treatment, and the decision to treat needs to be individualised based on a patient's observed disease behaviour, baseline and longitudinal lung function measurements, extent of lung involvement on radiology and patient factors including age, co-morbidities and personal preference. If indicated, treatment of the CTD-ILD is largely with immunomodulation, with the aim to prevent progression of the ILD before further irreversible lung injury and disability occurs. Corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine are the most common immunosuppressive agents currently used to treat CTD-ILD, demonstrating stability of lung function in case series and a small number of randomised controlled trials in ILD associated with systemic sclerosis. Biological and non-biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, and the anti-fibrotics nintedanib and pirfenidone, have revolutionised the treatment of connective tissue diseases and idiopathic ILD, respectively. Furthermore, anti-fibrotics have recently demonstrated safety and efficacy in ILD associated with systemic sclerosis. There remains a critical unmet need to clarify when and in whom to initiate treatment, and which agent(s) to utilise to achieve optimal outcomes for CTD-ILD patients whilst minimising harms through prospective multicentre trials. This review highlights the challenges faced when treating patients with CTD-ILD and summarises available evidence for current, emerging and novel therapies.

New insights into the treatment of myositis

The myositis syndromes include polymyositis, dermatomyositis (DM), necrotizing myopathy, inclusion body myositis (IBM), antisynthetase syndrome and overlap syndromes with myositis. These syndromes mostly occur in middle-aged patients, while juvenile DM occurs in children and adolescents. Patients mostly show a subacute weakness and myalgia in the upper and lower limbs, the diagnosis is based upon these clinical findings in combination with muscle biopsy results and specific serum autoantibodies. In recent years, research achieved a better understanding about the molecular mechanism underlying the myositis syndromes, as well as disease progress and extramuscular organ manifestations, such as interstitial lung disease and association with neoplasias. Treatment mainly consists of glucocorticosteroids and immunosuppressants. IBM is usually refractory to treatments. This review provides an overview of the current standards of treatment and new treatment options like monoclonal antibodies and new molecular therapies and their first results from clinical trials.

Effects of cyclophosphamide combined with prednisone on TNF-α expression in treatment of patients with interstitial lung disease

Effects of cyclophosphamide combined with prednisone on TNF-α expression in the treatment of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), and its clinical significance were investigated. A prospective analysis was performed on 198 patients with ILD in Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University from January 2010 to December 2017. Among them, 101 patients treated with cyclophosphamide combined with prednisone were assigned in the combined treatment group, and 97 patients treated with prednisone alone in the control group. Patients in the two groups were compared in terms of lung function, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, clinical efficacy, adverse reactions and TNF-α expression levels before and after treatment. After treatment, the patients in the combined treatment group had significantly higher forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1) compared with the control group, but significantly lower diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and DLCO% (P<0.05). In both groups, patients after treatment had higher FVC and FEV1, but lower DLCO and DLCO% (P<0.05), compared with before treatment, while SGRQ score before treatment was higher than that after treatment (P<0.05). Compared with control group, the combined treatment group had significantly more patients with complete remission (CR) and higher total effective rate, however less patients with stable disease (SD) (P<0.05). Patients with adverse reactions in the combined treatment group were less than those in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, TNF-α expression level in the combined treatment group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), and TNF-α expression before treatment was higher than that after treatment in both groups (P<0.05). In conclusion, cyclophosphamide combined with prednisone is effective and safe in the treatment of ILD without severe adverse reactions, reducing TNF-α expression level, and therefore is worthy of clinical application.

Interstitial Pneumonia With Autoimmune Features (IPAF)

A significant proportion of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) manifest autoimmune features, but do not fulfill the diagnostic criteria for a definite connective tissue disease (CTD). In 2015, the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and American Thoracic Society (ATS) “Task Force on undifferentiated Forms of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease” proposed classification criteria for a so-called research category of Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features (IPAF). These classification criteria were based on a combination of features from three domains: a clinical domain consisting of extra-thoracic features; a serologic domain with specific autoantibodies; and a morphologic domain with imaging patterns, histopathological findings or multi-compartment involvement. Patients meeting IPAF criteria tend to have a history of smoking similar to patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The most frequent clinical and serological markers of autoimmune features are Raynaud' phenomenon and positive antinuclear antibodies, respectively. Non-specific interstitial pneumonia is the predominant radiologic and histopathologic pattern, although patients meeting IPAF criteria through the clinical and serologic domains may also have a usual interstitial pneumonia pattern. Management should be carefully individualized on a case-by-case basis in keeping with the wide heterogeneity of IPAF and lack of evidence in this particular subgroup of patients. Prognosis is generally intermediate between that of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease, but substantially variable according to the predominant histologic and radiologic patterns. As acknowledged by the Task Force, the proposed classification scheme of IPAF is a research concept that will need revision and refinement based on data to better inform prognostication and patient care.

New treatment paradigms for connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is frequently observed in connective tissue disease (CTD) and is a major cause of mortality. In CTD-ILD, a marked variability in morphological patterns, time course and severity exists. In many patients, CTD-ILD is limited and inherently stable, although a significant proportion of patients have progressive disease. We review the utility of integration of the recently proposed disease behavior classification into the management of CTD-ILD, and recent advances in treatment approaches.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies on scleroderma-ILD (SSc-ILD) staging and short-term lung function trends provide important information, although accurate prognostic markers, particularly in limited/early CTD-ILD, are still needed. Most patients with progressive CTD-ILD stabilize on immunosuppression, as observed in recent SSc-ILD trials and CTD-ILD retrospective series. A minority of patients present with life-threatening acute/subacute ILD, requiring intense immunosuppression, with limited available guidance. A significant minority of CTD-ILD patients have progressive disease despite immunosuppression. Ongoing trials with antifibrotic agents and with biologic agents may reveal a potential role for their use/addition.

SUMMARY

Ultimately, further research into the mechanisms linking autoimmunity to fibrosis and randomized controlled clinical trials are needed, with the aim of preventing irreversible damage of lung tissue, while minimizing burden of treatment.

Current Treatment for Myositis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review was to give an update on treatment modalities for patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, or shortly myositis, excluding the subgroup inclusion body myositis, based on a literature survey on therapies used in myositis. Few controlled trials have been performed in patients with myositis; therefore, we also included a summary of open-label trials, case series, and case reports.

RECENT FINDINGS

Glucocorticoid (GC) in high doses is still the first-line treatment of patients with myositis. There is a general recommendation to combine GCs with another immunosuppressive agent in the early phase of disease to better control disease activity and possibly to reduce the risk for GC-related side effects. Furthermore, combining pharmacological treatment with individualized and supervised exercise can be recommended based on evidence. There is some evidence for the effect of rituximab in patients with certain myositis-specific autoantibodies, whereas other biologic agents are currently being tested in clinical trials.

SUMMARY

Immunosuppressive treatment in combination with exercise is recommended for patients with myositis to reduce disease activity and improve muscle performance. Subgrouping of patients into clinical and serological subtypes may be a way to identify biomarkers for response to specific immunosuppressive and biological agents and should be considered in future trials.

Multidimensional improvement in connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease: Two courses of pulse dose methylprednisolone followed by low-dose prednisone and tacrolimus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents are considered mainstays of therapy for connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD); however, tacrolimus with corticosteroid therapy has not been fully investigated. Our objectives were to examine the multidimensional therapeutic benefit and tolerability of the combined therapy for the initial treatment of patients with CTD-ILD.

METHODS

In this retrospective case series, we identified consecutive CTD-ILD patients treated with tacrolimus plus intravenous (i.v.) methylprednisolone (1000 mg i.v. 3 days a week for 2 weeks) followed by low-dose prednisolone (10 mg/day). We assessed the multidimensional therapeutic benefit and tolerability including lung physiology, exercise capacity, exercise oxygen desaturation, modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).

RESULTS

A total of 26 ILD patients with the underlying CTD diagnoses included 11 with rheumatoid arthritis, 9 with dermatomyositis, 4 with Sjögren's syndrome and 2 others. From baseline to 12 months, the combined therapy significantly improved forced vital capacity (FVC; 77.8% to 94.6%, P < 0.001), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DL_CO ; 66.1% to 75.1%, P < 0.001), 6-min walk distance (6MWD; 530 to 568 m, P = 0.02), lowest oxygen saturation on pulse oximetry (SpO₂ ; 85% to 89%, P = 0.01), MMRC (1.3 to 0.8, P = 0.01) and SGRQ (38 to 21, P < 0.001). During the study period, only one patient's therapy was discontinued due to an adverse event and none had a life-threatening adverse event attributed to the combined therapy.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort of CTD-ILD, two courses of pulse dose methylprednisolone therapy followed by prednisone and oral tacrolimus appeared to be well tolerated, and to have multidimensional efficacy.

Current diagnosis and treatment of polymyositis and dermatomyositis

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are heterogeneous disorders that affect the skeletal muscles. Polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and inclusion body myositis are major IIM subsets. Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy became recognized as a potentially new IIM subset. Since the new classification criteria published by the International Myositis Classification Criteria Project have higher sensitivity and specificity for IIM classification and subclassification than the previous criteria, they should help precise diagnosis. It should be noted that several tests available in current clinical practice, such as electromyography, magnetic resonance imaging, and other myositis-specific autoantibodies than anti-Jo-1 antibodies, were not included in the new criteria. As for treatment, glucocorticoids are used empirically as the first-line treatment despite their various adverse effects. Concomitant treatment with steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents, including methotrexate, azathioprine, calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclophosphamide, reduces successfully initial glucocorticoid doses for the remission induction, the relapse risk during glucocorticoid tapering, and adverse effects of glucocorticoids. Treatment with biologics, including rituximab and abatacept, seems promising in some IIM patients. Multi-target treatment with glucocorticoids and several steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents is effective in refractory IIM patients. Considering proven steroid-sparing efficacy and tolerability of multi-target treatment in patients with other autoimmune diseases, it should be a good therapeutic option for IIMs.

Pharmacogenetics and interstitial lung disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is comprised of a heterogeneous group of disorders with highly variable natural histories and response to therapies. Pharmacogenetics focuses on the variability in drug response because of the presence of genetic factors that influence drug metabolism or disease activity. In this article, we review relevant drug-specific and disease-specific polymorphisms that may influence therapeutic response, and then highlight a recently identified drug-gene interaction in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

RECENT FINDINGS

The emergence of high-throughput genomic technology has allowed for identification of gene polymorphisms associated with susceptibility to specific disease states, including IPF and several connective tissue diseases known to cause ILD. IPF risk loci span a diverse group of genes, while most associated with connective tissue disease are critical to immune signaling. A recent pharmacogenetic analysis of patients enrolled in an IPF clinical trial identified a variant within TOLLIP to be associated with differential response to N-acetylcysteine therapy.

SUMMARY

Though few pharmacogenetic investigations have been conducted in patients with ILD to date, ample opportunities for pharmacogenetic exploration exist in this patient population. Such exploration will advance our understanding of specific ILDs and help usher in an era of personalized medicine.

Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features: Overview of proposed criteria and recent cohort characterization

The accurate diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is essential for optimal prognostication and management. While connective tissue disease (CTD) is among the most common causes of ILD, some patients have features suggestive of autoimmunity without meeting criteria for a specific CTD. To help define and study this disease entity more uniformly, a 2015 research statement proposed consensus-based criteria and coined the term "interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features" (IPAF). In this review, we summarize and compare previously proposed criteria to characterize these patients, provide an overview of the IPAF criteria and highlight recent investigations aimed at characterizing IPAF cohorts. We then call attention to questions that have arisen with the application of the IPAF criteria and discuss future areas of study.

Recent advances in connective tissue disease related interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common manifestation of connective tissue disease (CTD). Although the majority of patients with CTD-ILD are stable or slowly progressive, a significant group exhibits a more severe and progressive decline. Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) describes the subset of patients with interstitial pneumonia who have features suggesting underlying autoimmunity, but whose features fall short of a clear diagnosis of CTD. Areas covered: In this focused review, we discuss recent advances in early detection, prognostic evaluation, and management of autoimmune forms of ILD. Expert commentary: Early detection of ILD and a better understanding of factors that impact prognostication may be helpful when making decisions regarding therapeutic interventions. The treatment of CTD-ILD should be comprehensive, is often fraught with challenges and can be complicated by comorbid conditions and extra-thoracic disease activities. Several large randomized studies have examined the impact of immunosuppressive therapy for CTD-ILD, however, additional studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment strategies. Future studies may provide additional information about the best treatments in patients with IPAF.

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Antisynthetase Syndrome

Anti-synthetase syndrome is an autoimmune condition, characterized by antibodies directed against an aminoacycl transfer RNA synthetase along with clinical features that can include interstitial lung disease, myositis, Raynaud's phenomenon, and arthritis. There is a higher prevalence and increased severity of interstitial lung disease in patients with anti-synthetase syndrome, as compared to dermatomyositis and polymyositis, inflammatory myopathies with which it may overlap phenotypically. Diagnosis is made by a multidisciplinary approach, synthesizing rheumatology and pulmonary evaluations, along with serologic, radiographic, and occasionally muscle and/or lung biopsy results. Patients with anti-synthetase syndrome often require multi-modality immunosuppressive therapy in order to control the muscle and/or pulmonary manifestations of their disease. The long-term care of these patients mandates careful attention to the adverse effects and complications of chronic immunosuppressive therapy, as well as disease-related sequelae that can include progressive interstitial lung disease necessitating lung transplantation, pulmonary hypertension, malignancy and decreased survival. It is hoped that greater awareness of the clinical features of this syndrome will allow for earlier diagnosis and appropriate treatment to improve outcomes in patients with anti-synthetase syndrome.

Therapeutic Approach to Adult Fibrotic Lung Diseases

Among the interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and fibrotic connective tissue disease-related ILD are associated with a worse prognosis, with death occurring as a result of both respiratory failure and serious associated comorbidities. The recent development and approval of the antifibrotic agents nintedanib and pirfenidone, both of which reduced the rate of decline in lung function in patients with IPF in clinical trials, offer hope that it may be possible to alter the increased mortality associated with IPF. Although chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis and connective tissue disease related-ILD may be associated with an inflammatory component, the evidence for the use of immunosuppressive agents in their treatment is largely limited to retrospective studies. The lack of benefit of immunosuppressive therapy in advanced fibrosis argues for rigorous clinical trials using antifibrotic therapies in these types of ILD as well. Patients with fibrotic ILD may benefit from identification and management of associated comorbid conditions such as pulmonary hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux, and OSA, which may improve the quality of life and, in some cases, survival in affected individuals. Because early assessment may optimize posttransplantation outcomes, lung transplant evaluation should occur early in patients with IPF and those with other forms of fibrotic ILD.