1
|
Lu X, Yin Y, Geng W, Liu L, Liu F, Zhang Z. Acute skin toxicity and self-management ability among Chinese breast cancer radiotherapy patients: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:394. [PMID: 38814489 PMCID: PMC11139738 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08583-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Radiation dermatitis is the most common reaction to radiotherapy, almost all breast cancer patients receive radiotherapy on an outpatient basis. Currently, there are no studies on the experience of radiation dermatitis and the ability to self-manage it. Therefore, we aimed to use qualitative approaches to gain a deeper understanding of the actual experiences and self-management ability in order to provide a reference for further improving the effectiveness of self-management and to optimize symptom management strategies. METHODS A descriptive qualitative study was conducted using purposive sampling to select 17 breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Semi-structured interviews were conducted from September to November 2023. The Colaizzi seven-step analysis method was used to classify the data into summarized themes. RESULTS Four themes were identified from the interview responses: (1) multiple self-reported skin symptoms in breast cancer patients with radiation dermatitis; (2) the multidimensional impact on patient's quality of life, especially pruritus, ulceration; (3) the ability to self-manage radiation dermatitis: strong mental toughness, positive response, and self-doubt; (4) challenges faced: concerns about radiotherapy side effects and recurrence, targeted symptom management and continuity of care after the radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Healthcare professionals should consider patients' self-reported symptoms when assessing radiation dermatitis. For pruritus and pain, we can enhance precision symptom management to improve patients' quality of life. By utilizing information technology tools, we can increase breast cancer patients' ability and confidence in managing radiation dermatitis effectively while enhancing accurate symptom management during radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaomeng Lu
- Radiotherapy Department, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Yunteng Yin
- Department of Otolaryngology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Wenhui Geng
- Radiotherapy Department, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Lei Liu
- Department of Breast Centre, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Fengxia Liu
- Department of Nursing, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
| | - Zhenye Zhang
- Department of Hospital Management, Shenzhou Hospital, Shenzhou, Hebei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Purswani JM, Nwankwo C, Adotama P, Gutierrez D, Perez CA, Tattersall IW, Gerber NK. Radiation-induced skin changes after breast or chest wall irradiation in patients with breast cancer and skin of color: a systematic review. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:1-14. [PMID: 36335037 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to systematically review data pertaining to breast cancer and radiation-induced skin reactions in patients with skin of color (SOC), as well as data pertaining to objective measurements of skin pigmentation in the assessment of radiation dermatitis (RD). METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a systematic review utilizing MEDLINE electronic databases to identify published studies until August 2022. Key inclusion criteria included studies that described RD in breast cancer with data pertaining to skin of color and/or characterization of pigmentation changes after radiation. RESULTS We identified 17 prospective cohort studies, 7 cross-sectional studies, 5 retrospective studies and 4 randomized controlled trials. Prospective cohort and retrospective series demonstrate worse RD in African American (AA) patients using subjective physician-graded scales. There is more limited data in patients representing other non-White racial subgroups with SOC. 2 studies utilize patient reported outcomes and 15 studies utilize objective methods to characterize pigmentation change after radiation. There are no prospective and randomized studies that objectively describe pigmentation changes with radiotherapy in SOC. CONCLUSIONS AA patients appear to have worse RD outcomes, though this is not uniformly observed across all studies. There are no studies that describe objective measures of RD and include baseline skin pigmentation as a variable, limiting the ability to draw uniform conclusions on the rate and impact of RD in SOC. We highlight the importance of objectively characterizing SOC and pigmentation changes before, during and after radiotherapy to understand the incidence and severity of RD in SOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juhi M Purswani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Health and Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| | - Christy Nwankwo
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO
| | - Prince Adotama
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Daniel Gutierrez
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Carmen A Perez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Health and Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ian W Tattersall
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Naamit K Gerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Health and Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vicini F, Broughman J, Halima A, Mayo Z, Obi E, Al-Hilli Z, Arthur D, Wazer D, Shah C. Delivery of Adjuvant Radiation in 5 Days or Less After Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:1090-1104. [PMID: 34921906 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent data have been published supporting the application of ultra-short radiation therapy (RT) regimens for women with early stage breast cancer following breast conserving surgery (BCS). What has remained controversial is whether and how to apply accelerated whole breast irradiation (AWBI) or accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) approaches in these patients, as well as the consideration of intraoperative RT (IORT) for this population. METHODS We performed a systematic review of the literature searching for randomized and prospective data published evaluating ultra-short RT delivered in 5-days or less with APBI, AWBI, or IORT. RESULTS We identified two randomized studies applying AWBI (n=5,011 patients) with 5 to 10 year follow up, which supported the use of ultra-short course AWBI (5 fractions in one week) as compared to hypofractionated WBI. We identified six randomized trials evaluating APBI (as compared to WBI) in 5 days or less (n= 8,415) with numerous (n=55) prospective studies as well, with the data supporting short course APBI as compared to WBI. Finally, we identified two randomized trials evaluating IORT; however, both trials demonstrated elevated rates of recurrence with IORT as compared to WBI. CONCLUSIONS The current body of data available for ultra-short adjuvant RT regimens delivered in 5-days or less after BCS overwhelming support their utilization. While data for both exists, APBI regimens have, by far, greater numbers of patients and longer follow-up as compared to AWBI. Also, given increased rates of recurrence seen with IORT with long-term follow-up, this should not be considered a standard approach at this time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James Broughman
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ahmed Halima
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Zachary Mayo
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Elizabeth Obi
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Zahraa Al-Hilli
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Douglas Arthur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - David Wazer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Chirag Shah
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Behroozian T, Milton L, Zhang L, Lou J, Karam I, Lam E, Wong G, Szumacher E, Chow E. How do patient-reported outcomes compare with clinician assessments? A prospective study of radiation dermatitis in breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2021; 159:98-105. [PMID: 33771577 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Breast cancer patients frequently develop radiation dermatitis (RD) when undergoing post-operative radiation therapy (RT). Traditional RD assessment methods measure clinician-reported outcomes (CROs), but patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have gained recent popularity. The purpose of this prospective analysis was to compare PROs with CROs of breast RD. MATERIALS AND METHODS Demographic and treatment characteristics were prospectively collected for patients receiving post-operative RT between February 2018 to September 2020. Patients and clinicians completed a skin symptom assessment at baseline, weekly during RT, and at a one- to three-month follow-up visit. Skin treatments used by patients were collected. Concordance between each PRO and CRO was determined using percent concordance and concordance index (C-statistic) by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 777 patients were included in the present study. All skin symptom assessment items were significantly underreported by clinicians in comparison to patients (p < 0.0001), with a low to moderate level of concordance (C-statistic range: 0.58-0.70; percent concordance range: 29-50%). The majority of patients used moisturizing creams as a prophylactic measure (65.1%), as per institutional guidelines. CONCLUSION There were significant discrepancies between PROs and CROs when assessing breast RD. CROs alone are insufficient in measuring RD as they fail to capture the impact on patient quality of life. The study findings highlight the need for improved RD symptom assessment and support the development of a new tool with both patient and clinician components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Behroozian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Lauren Milton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Irene Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Emily Lam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Gina Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Ewa Szumacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Edward Chow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lam E, Yee C, Wong G, Popovic M, Drost L, Pon K, Vesprini D, Lam H, Aljabri S, Soliman H, DeAngelis C, Chow E. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinician-reported versus patient-reported outcomes of radiation dermatitis. Breast 2020; 50:125-134. [PMID: 31563429 PMCID: PMC7375608 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Revised: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation dermatitis is a common adverse effect of radiotherapy (RT) in breast cancer patients. Although radiation dermatitis is reported by either the clinician or the patient, previous studies have shown disagreement between clinician-reported outcomes (CROs) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This review evaluated the extent of discordance between CROs and PROs for radiation dermatitis. Studies reporting both clinician and patient-reported outcomes for external beam RT were eligible. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review, while 8 of these studies were eligible for inclusion in a meta-analysis of acute and late skin toxicities. We found an overall agreement between CROs and PROs of acute skin colour change, fibrosis and/or retraction, and moist desquamation (p > 0.005). Reporting of late breast pain, breast edema, skin colour change, telangiectasia, fibrosis and/or retraction and induration/fibrosis alone (p > 0.005) were also in agreement between clinicians and patients. Our meta-analysis revealed a greater reporting of acute breast pain by patients (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.87-0.92, p < 0.001), greater reporting of acute breast edema by physicians (RR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.65-1.97, p < 0.001) and a greater reporting of late breast shrinkage by patients (RR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.86, p = 0.005). However, our review was limited by the discrepancies between PRO and CRO measurement tools as well as the absence of standard time points for evaluation of radiation dermatitis. Given potential discrepancies between CROs and PROs, both measures should be reported in future studies. Ultimately, we advocate for the development of a single tool to assess symptoms from both perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Lam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caitlin Yee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gina Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marko Popovic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leah Drost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kucy Pon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Henry Lam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Saleh Aljabri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carlo DeAngelis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Edward Chow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bathily T, Borget I, Rivin Del Campo E, Rivera S, Bourgier C. Partial versus whole breast irradiation: Side effects, patient satisfaction and costs. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:83-91. [PMID: 30929861 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2018.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Revised: 02/16/2018] [Accepted: 06/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Since accelerated partial breast irradiation has demonstrated non-inferiority to whole breast irradiation regarding recurrence rate in patients with early stage breast cancer, our objective was to compare its impact on short-term adverse events, patient satisfaction and costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with early stage breast cancer treated by breast-conserving surgery between 2007 and 2012 were included: 48 women who received three-dimensional conformal accelerated partial breast irradiation in a multicentre phase-II trial were paired with 48 patients prospectively treated with whole breast irradiation. Adverse events, and patients' opinions concerning cosmesis, satisfaction and pain, were gathered 1 month after treatment. Direct and indirect costs were collected from the French National Health Insurance System perspective until the end of radiotherapy. RESULTS When comparing its impact, skin reactions occurred in 37% of patients receiving three-dimensional conformal accelerated partial breast radiotherapy and 60% of patients receiving whole breast irradiation (P=0.07); 98% were very satisfied in the group three-dimensional conformal accelerated partial breast radiotherapy versus 46% in the group treated with whole breast irradiation (P<0.001); direct costs were significantly lower in the group treated with partial breast irradiation (mean cost: 2510€ versus 5479€/patient), due to less radiation sessions. CONCLUSION In patients with early-stage breast cancer, partial irradiation offered a good alternative to whole breast irradiation, as it was less expensive and satisfactory. These, and the clinical safety and tolerance results, need to be confirmed by long-term accelerated partial breast irradiation results in on-going phase III trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Bathily
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - I Borget
- Service de biostatistique et d'épidémiologie, Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France; Inserm U1018, CESP, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Sud, université Paris-Saclay, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - E Rivin Del Campo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France.
| | - S Rivera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - C Bourgier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut du cancer de Montpellier, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang K, Yee C, Tam S, Drost L, Chan S, Zaki P, Rico V, Ariello K, Dasios M, Lam H, DeAngelis C, Chow E. Prevalence of pain in patients with breast cancer post-treatment: A systematic review. Breast 2018; 42:113-127. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.08.105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Revised: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
8
|
Yoo S, Blitzblau R, Yin FF, Horton JK. Dosimetric comparison of preoperative single-fraction partial breast radiotherapy techniques: 3D CRT, noncoplanar IMRT, coplanar IMRT, and VMAT. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2015; 16:5126. [PMID: 25679170 PMCID: PMC4484297 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2014] [Revised: 09/29/2014] [Accepted: 09/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare dosimetric parameters of treatment plans among four techniques for preoperative single‐fraction partial breast radiotherapy in order to select an optimal treatment technique. The techniques evaluated were noncoplanar 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT), noncoplanar intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRTNC), coplanar IMRT (IMRTCO), and volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The planning CT scans of 16 patients in the prone position were used in this study, with the single‐fraction prescription doses of 15 Gy for the first eight patients and 18 Gy for the remaining eight patients. Six (6) MV photon beams were designed to avoid the heart and contralateral breast. Optimization for IMRT and VMAT was performed to reduce the dose to the skin and normal breast. All plans were normalized such that 100% of the prescribed dose covered greater than 95% of the clinical target volume (CTV) consisting of gross tumor volume (GTV) plus 1.5 cm margin. Mean homogeneity index (HI) was the lowest (1.05±0.02) for 3D CRT and the highest (1.11±0.04) for VMAT. Mean conformity index (CI) was the lowest (1.42±0.32) for IMRTNC and the highest (1.60±0.32) for VMAT. Mean of the maximum point dose to skin was the lowest (73.7±11.5%) for IMRTNC and the highest (86.5±6.68%) for 3D CRT. IMRTCO showed very similar HI, CI, and maximum skin dose to IMRTNC (differences<1%). The estimated mean treatment delivery time, excluding the time spent for patient positioning and imaging, was 7.0±1.0,8.3±1.1,9.7±1.0, and 11.0±1.5min for VMAT,IMRTCO,IMRTNC and 3D CRT, respectively. In comparison of all four techniques for preoperative single‐fraction partial breast radiotherapy, we can conclude that noncoplanar or coplanar IMRT were optimal in this study as IMRT plans provided homogeneous and conformal target coverage, skin sparing, and relatively short treatment delivery time. PACS numbers: 81.40.Wx, 87.55.D‐
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sua Yoo
- Duke University Medical Center.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Todor D, Becker S, Orton CG. Brachytherapy is better than external beam therapy for partial breast irradiation. Med Phys 2013; 40:080601. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4798227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
10
|
Bartelink H, Bourgier C, Elkhuizen P. Has partial breast irradiation by IORT or brachytherapy been prematurely introduced into the clinic? Radiother Oncol 2012; 104:139-42. [PMID: 22857804 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2012] [Revised: 07/19/2012] [Accepted: 07/20/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
In contrast to most new oncology treatments, wide clinical introduction of partial breast irradiation (PBI) is not based on level A trial evidence. Despite promising phase I/II data, new reports based upon large cohorts of patients mention more recurrences and/or complications from PBI compared with whole breast irradiation (WBI), necessitating more careful selection of patients for PBI while awaiting long term results of major clinical trials. In an attempt to improve this we give preoperative PBI within a prospective trial.
Collapse
|