1
|
Rubino F, Brahimaj B, Hanna EY, Su SY, Phan J, Grosshans DR, DeMonte F, Raza SM. Does Time to Initiation of Adjuvant Radiotherapy Affect Reconstruction Outcomes after Endoscopic Resection of Skull Base Malignancies? J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2024; 85:445-457. [PMID: 39228888 PMCID: PMC11368463 DOI: 10.1055/a-2114-4563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction and Objective It is unclear if the length of the time interval to initiation of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) after endoscopic endonasal surgery affects reconstruction outcomes. In this study we present our experience with adjuvant RT after endoscopic endonasal procedures, to determine if the time to RT after surgery impacts post-RT reconstruction complication rates. Methods A retrospective cohort study of 164 patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal surgery between 1998 and 2021 was conducted. Using Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs), we evaluated several variables and the complications that occurred during the 1-year period after starting RT. Results Seventy-eight (47.5%) and eighty-six patients (52.5%) received RT before and after the sixth postoperative week, respectively. The overall post-RT complication rates were 28%, most of these were severe infections ( n = 20, 12.2%) and delayed CSF leak ( n = 4, 2.5%). There was no significant difference in the post-RT complications between the patients who received postoperative RT before or after the sixth operative week (HR: 1.13; 95% confidence interval: 0.63-2.02; p = 0.675 ). Univariate analysis demonstrated negative impact associated with smoking history ( p = 0.015 ), the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( p = 0.0001 ), and the use of photon therapy ( p = 0.012 ); and we found a positive impact with the use of multilayer reconstruction techniques (overall, p = 0.041 ; with fat, p = 0.038 ; and/or fascia graft, p = 0.035 ). After a multivariate analysis only, smoking history was an independent risk factor for post-RT complications ( p = 0.012 ). Conclusion Delaying RT for more than 6 weeks after endoscopic endonasal surgery does not provide a significant benefit for reconstruction outcomes. However, special attention may be warranted in patients with smoking history who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or in patients who will receive photon-based RT after surgery as these groups were found to have increased complication rates post-RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franco Rubino
- Division of Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Bledi Brahimaj
- Division of Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Ehab Y. Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Shirley Y. Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Jack Phan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - David R. Grosshans
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Franco DeMonte
- Division of Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Shaan M. Raza
- Division of Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fietkau R, Höller U, Krause M, Petersen C, van Kampen M, Vordermark D, Willner J. [Structural, procedural, and personnel requirements for provision of radiation oncology and radiation therapy services in Germany in 2023-a position paper of the German Society of Radiation Oncologists (DEGRO)]. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:697-705. [PMID: 37336797 PMCID: PMC10361887 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02105-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer Fietkau
- Strahlenklinik, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054
| | - Ulrike Höller
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie (DEGRO), Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Cordula Petersen
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
- Ambulanzzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
| | - Michael van Kampen
- Radioonkologische Klinik, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt/Main, Deutschland
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Deutschland
| | - Jochen Willner
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Medizincampus Oberfranken der FAU Erlangen, Bayreuth, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hooshangnejad H, Chen Q, Feng X, Zhang R, Farjam R, Voong KR, Hales RK, Du Y, Jia X, Ding K. DAART: a deep learning platform for deeply accelerated adaptive radiation therapy for lung cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1201679. [PMID: 37483512 PMCID: PMC10359160 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1201679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The study aimed to implement a novel, deeply accelerated adaptive radiation therapy (DAART) approach for lung cancer radiotherapy (RT). Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death, and RT is the preferred medically inoperable treatment for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the current lengthy workflow, it takes a median of four weeks from diagnosis to RT treatment, which can result in complete restaging and loss of local control with delay. We implemented the DAART approach, featuring a novel deepPERFECT system, to address unwanted delays between diagnosis and treatment initiation. Materials and methods We developed a deepPERFECT to adapt the initial diagnostic imaging to the treatment setup to allow initial RT planning and verification. We used data from 15 patients with NSCLC treated with RT to train the model and test its performance. We conducted a virtual clinical trial to evaluate the treatment quality of the proposed DAART for lung cancer radiotherapy. Results We found that deepPERFECT predicts planning CT with a mean high-intensity fidelity of 83 and 14 HU for the body and lungs, respectively. The shape of the body and lungs on the synthesized CT was highly conformal, with a dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.91, 0.97, and Hausdorff distance (HD) of 7.9 mm, and 4.9 mm, respectively, compared with the planning CT scan. The tumor showed less conformality, which warrants acquisition of treatment Day1 CT and online adaptive RT. An initial plan was designed on synthesized CT and then adapted to treatment Day1 CT using the adapt to position (ATP) and adapt to shape (ATS) method. Non-inferior plan quality was achieved by the ATP scenario, while all ATS-adapted plans showed good plan quality. Conclusion DAART reduces the common online ART (ART) treatment course by at least two weeks, resulting in a 50% shorter time to treatment to lower the chance of restaging and loss of local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamed Hooshangnejad
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Carnegie Center of Surgical Innovation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Quan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Xue Feng
- Carina Medical, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Rui Zhang
- Division of Computational Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Reza Farjam
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Khinh Ranh Voong
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Russell K. Hales
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Yong Du
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Xun Jia
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kai Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Carnegie Center of Surgical Innovation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tumor radioresistance caused by radiation-induced changes of stem-like cell content and sub-lethal damage repair capability. Sci Rep 2022; 12:1056. [PMID: 35058559 PMCID: PMC8776741 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05172-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) within solid tumors exhibit radioresistance, leading to recurrence and distant metastasis after radiotherapy. To experimentally study the characteristics of CSCs, radioresistant cell lines were successfully established using fractionated X-ray irradiation. The fundamental characteristics of CSCs in vitro have been previously reported; however, the relationship between CSC and acquired radioresistance remains uncertain. To efficiently study this relationship, we performed both in vitro experiments and theoretical analysis using a cell-killing model. Four types of human oral squamous carcinoma cell lines, non-radioresistant cell lines (SAS and HSC2), and radioresistant cell lines (SAS-R and HSC2-R), were used to measure the surviving fraction after single-dose irradiation, split-dose irradiation, and multi-fractionated irradiation. The SAS-R and HSC2-R cell lines were more positive for one of the CSC marker aldehyde dehydrogenase activity than the corresponding non-radioresistant cell lines. The theoretical model analysis showed that changes in both the experimental-based ALDH (+) fractions and DNA repair efficiency of ALDH (-) fractions (i.e., sub-lethal damage repair) are required to reproduce the measured cell survival data of non-radioresistant and radioresistant cell lines. These results suggest that the enhanced cell recovery in SAS-R and HSC2-R is important when predicting tumor control probability in radiotherapy to require a long dose-delivery time; in other words, intensity-modulated radiation therapy is ideal. This work provides a precise understanding of the mechanism of radioresistance, which is induced after irradiation of cancer cells.
Collapse
|
5
|
Patel V, Kwok J, Burke M, Urbano TG, Fenlon M. Should the HPV positive oropharyngeal cancer patient be considered for a two-stage dental assessment for their radiation treatment? Radiother Oncol 2021; 164:232-235. [PMID: 34624407 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Patients due to commence head and neck radiation treatment are expected to undergo a dental assessment and be deemed 'dentally fit'. Though this intervention is welcomed by the dental fraternity it is not without its challenges especially in human papilloma virus (HPV) related oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) which has seen a phenomenal rise over the past decade. This perspective piece presents these challenges and proposes a potential adaption of the dental assessment for HPV OPC patients though not necessarily exclusive to this tumour sub-site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinod Patel
- Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital Oral Surgery Dept, London, UK.
| | - Jerry Kwok
- Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital Oral Surgery Dept, London, UK.
| | - Mary Burke
- Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital Sedation & Special Care Dept, London, UK.
| | - Teresa Guerrero Urbano
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust and King's College London, Oncology Department, London, UK.
| | - Michael Fenlon
- Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schulz A, Meyer F, Dubrovska A, Borgmann K. Cancer Stem Cells and Radioresistance: DNA Repair and Beyond. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11060862. [PMID: 31234336 PMCID: PMC6627210 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11060862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 196] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The current preclinical and clinical findings demonstrate that, in addition to the conventional clinical and pathological indicators that have a prognostic value in radiation oncology, the number of cancer stem cells (CSCs) and their inherent radioresistance are important parameters for local control after radiotherapy. In this review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms of CSC radioresistance attributable to DNA repair mechanisms and the development of CSC-targeted therapies for tumor radiosensitization. We also discuss the current challenges in preclinical and translational CSC research including the high inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity, plasticity of CSCs, and microenvironment-stimulated tumor cell reprogramming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Schulz
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
| | - Felix Meyer
- Laboratory of Radiobiology & Experimental Radiooncology, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Center of Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Anna Dubrovska
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, 01328 Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Kerstin Borgmann
- Laboratory of Radiobiology & Experimental Radiooncology, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Center of Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li C, Zhang X, Pang L, Huang Y, Gao Y, Sun X, Yu J, Meng X. Spatial Concordance of Tumor Proliferation and Accelerated Repopulation from Pathologic Images to 3′-[18F]Fluoro-3′-Deoxythymidine PET Images: a Basic Study Guided for PET-Based Radiotherapy Dose Painting. Mol Imaging Biol 2018; 21:713-721. [DOI: 10.1007/s11307-018-1292-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
8
|
Bütof R, Simon M, Löck S, Troost EGC, Appold S, Krause M, Baumann M. PORTAF - postoperative radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: accelerated versus conventional fractionation - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017; 18:608. [PMID: 29262836 PMCID: PMC5738814 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2346-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2017] [Accepted: 11/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without affected lymph nodes detected at staging, surgical resection is still the mainstay of treatment. However, in patients with metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes (pN2) or non-radically resected primary tumors (R1/R2), postoperative radiotherapy (possibly combined with chemotherapy) is indicated. So far, investigations about time factors affecting postoperative radiotherapy have only examined the waiting time defined as interval between surgery and start of radiotherapy, but not the overall treatment time (OTT) itself. Conversely, results from trials on primary radio(chemo)therapy in NSCLC show that longer OTT correlates with significantly worse local tumor control and overall survival rates. This time factor of primary radio(chemo)therapy is thought to mainly be based on repopulation of surviving tumor cells between irradiation fractions. It remains to be elucidated if such an effect also occurs when patients with NSCLC are treated with postoperative radiotherapy after surgery (and chemotherapy). Our own retrospective data suggest an advantage of shorter OTT also for postoperative radiotherapy in this patient group. METHODS/DESIGN This is a multicenter, prospective randomized trial investigating whether an accelerated course of postoperative radiotherapy with photons or protons (7 fractions per week, 2 Gy fractions) improves locoregional tumor control in NSCLC patients in comparison to conventional fractionation (5 fractions per week, 2 Gy fractions). Target volumes and total radiation doses will be stratified in both treatment arms based on individual risk factors. DISCUSSION For the primary endpoint of the study we postulate an increase in local tumor control from 70% to 85% after 36 months. Secondary endpoints are overall survival of patients; local recurrence-free and distant metastases-free survival after 36 months; acute and late toxicity and quality of life for both treatment methods. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02189967 . Registered on 22 May 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. .,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| | - M Simon
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - S Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - E G C Troost
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - S Appold
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - M Krause
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - M Baumann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zurl B, Bayerl A, De Vries A, Geinitz H, Hawliczek R, Knocke-Abulesz TH, Lukas P, Pötter R, Raunik W, Scholz B, Schratter-Sehn A, Sedlmayer F, Seewald D, Selzer E, Kapp KS. ÖGRO survey on radiotherapy capacity in Austria : Status quo and estimation of future demands. Strahlenther Onkol 2017; 194:284-292. [PMID: 29222711 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-017-1240-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A comprehensive evaluation of the current national and regional radiotherapy capacity in Austria with an estimation of demands for 2020 and 2030 was performed by the Austrian Society for Radiation Oncology, Radiobiology and Medical Radiophysics (ÖGRO). MATERIALS AND METHODS All Austrian centers provided data on the number of megavoltage (MV) units, treatment series, fractions, percentage of retreatments and complex treatment techniques as well as the daily operating hours for the year 2014. In addition, waiting times until the beginning of radiotherapy were prospectively recorded over the first quarter of 2015. National and international epidemiological prediction data were used to estimate future demands. RESULTS For a population of 8.51 million, 43 MV units were at disposal. In 14 radiooncological centers, a total of 19,940 series with a mean number of 464 patients per MV unit/year and a mean fraction number of 20 (range 16-24) per case were recorded. The average re-irradiation ratio was 14%. The survey on waiting times until start of treatment showed provision shortages in 40% of centers with a mean waiting time of 13.6 days (range 0.5-29.3 days) and a mean maximum waiting time of 98.2 days. Of all centers, 21% had no or only a limited ability to deliver complex treatment techniques. Predictions for 2020 and 2030 indicate an increased need in the overall number of MV units to a total of 63 and 71, respectively. CONCLUSION This ÖGRO survey revealed major regional differences in radiooncological capacity. Considering epidemiological developments, an aggravation of the situation can be expected shortly. This analysis serves as a basis for improved public regional health care planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigitte Zurl
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz, Medizinische Universität Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 32, 8036, Graz, Austria.
| | - Anja Bayerl
- Klinische Abteilung für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Krems, Krems, Austria
| | - Alexander De Vries
- Abteilung für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Hans Geinitz
- Abteilung für Radio-Onkologie, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Robert Hawliczek
- Institut für Radioonkologie, SMZ-Ost Donauspital der Stadt Wien, Wien, Austria
| | | | - Peter Lukas
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Richard Pötter
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Raunik
- Institut für Strahlentherapie/Radioonkologie, Klinikum Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria
| | - Brigitte Scholz
- Institut für Radioonkologie, Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien, Wien, Austria
| | | | - Felix Sedlmayer
- Universitätsklinik für Radiotherapie und Radio-Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Dietmar Seewald
- Institut für Radioonkologie/Strahlentherapie, Salzkammergut-Klinikum Vöcklabruck, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Edgar Selzer
- Institut für Radioonkologie u. Strahlentherapie, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Karin S Kapp
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz, Medizinische Universität Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 32, 8036, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bütof R, Gumina C, Valentini C, Sommerer A, Appold S, Zips D, Löck S, Baumann M, Troost EGC. Sites of recurrent disease and prognostic factors in SCLC patients treated with radiochemotherapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2017; 7:36-42. [PMID: 29594227 PMCID: PMC5862679 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2017.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Revised: 09/29/2017] [Accepted: 09/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Most recurrences occurred within the primary tumor or initially affected lymph nodes. All sites of loco-regional recurrence had received 92–106% of the prescribed dose. No isolated nodal failure occurred, supporting the use of selective nodal irradiation.
Objectives Concurrent radiochemotherapy (RCHT) is standard treatment in locally advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. Due to conflicting results on elective nodal irradiation (ENI) or selective node irradiation (SNI) there is no clear evidence on optimal target volumes. Therefore, the purposes of this study were to assess the sites of recurrent disease in SCLC and to evaluate the feasibility of SNI versus ENI. Methods A retrospective single-institution study of 43 consecutive patients treated with RCHT was performed. After state-of-the-art staging including FDG-PET/CT, all patients underwent three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to a total dose of 45 Gy in twice-daily fractions of 1.5 Gy starting concurrently with the first or second chemotherapy cycle. All sites of loco-regional recurrences were correlated to the initial tumor and dose delivered. The impact of potential prognostic variables on outcome was evaluated using the Cox-regression model. Results 13 patients (30%) relapsed locally or regionally: six within the initial primary tumor volume, five within the initially affected lymph nodes, one metachronously within primary tumor and initially affected lymph nodes, and one both inside and outside of the initial nodal disease. All sites of loco-regional recurrence had received 92–106% of the prescribed dose. Conclusion In our study most recurrences occurred within the primary tumor or initially affected lymph nodes, or distantly. We did not register any case of isolated nodal failure, supporting the use of selective nodal irradiation, possibly with the addition of supraclavicular irradiation in patients with nodal disease in the upper mediastinum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Bütof
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| | - Calogero Gumina
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,Radiotherapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Chiara Valentini
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| | - Antje Sommerer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Appold
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Biologische Mechanismen der Strahlenwirkung. Radiologe 2017; 57:541-547. [DOI: 10.1007/s00117-017-0239-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
12
|
Koshy M, Malik R, Spiotto M, Mahmood U, Rusthoven CG, Sher DJ. Association between intensity modulated radiotherapy and survival in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Lung Cancer 2017. [PMID: 28625640 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the effect of radiotherapy (RT) technique on treatment compliance and overall survival (OS) in patients with stage III non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS This study included patients with stage III NSCLC in the National Cancer Database treated between 2003 and 2011 with definitive CRT to 60-63 Gray (Gy). Radiation treatment interruption (RTI) was defined as a break of ≥4 days. Treatment technique was dichotomized as intensity modulated (IMRT) or non-IMRT techniques. RESULTS Out of the cohort of 7492, 35% had a RTI and 10% received IMRT. With a median follow-up of surviving patients of 32 months, the median survival for those with non-IMRT vs. IMRT was 18.2 months vs. 20 months (p<0.0001). Median survival for those with and without an RTI≥4 days was 16.1 months vs. 19.8 months (p<0.0001). Use of IMRT predicted for a decreased likelihood of RTI (odds ratio, 0.84, p=0.04). On multivariable analysis for OS, IMRT had a HR of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80-0.98, p=0.01) and RTI had a HR of 1.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14-1.27, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS IMRT was associated with small but significant survival advantage for patients with stage III NSCLC treated with CRT. A RTI led to inferior survival, and both IMRT and RTI were independently associated with OS. Additional research should investigate whether improved tolerability, reduced normal tissue exposure, or superior coverage drives the association between IMRT and improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Koshy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Renuka Malik
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael Spiotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Usama Mahmood
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - David J Sher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
In-vivo Comparison of 18F-FLT uptake, CT Number, Tumor Volume in Evaluation of Repopulation during Radiotherapy for Lung cancer. Sci Rep 2017; 7:46000. [PMID: 28387306 PMCID: PMC5384084 DOI: 10.1038/srep46000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Accepted: 03/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Accelerated repopulation has been observed in various tumors. This study was aimed to evaluate the potential of 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) uptake and Computed Tomography Number (CTN) in monitoring tumor responses to radiotherapy compared with tumor volume (TV) changes. Tumor bearing nude mice were assigned to either irradiated daily or every second day group and then randomized to 6 sub-groups to receive 0Gy, 6Gy, 12Gy, 18Gy, 24Gy, 36Gy irradiation, respectively. TV was measured every 3 days. 18F-FLT micro-PET/CT scans were performed after irradiation being completed. Tumor sections were stained to calculate the immunohistochemical (Ki-67) labeling index (LI). Comparison analysis between FLT uptake parameters, CTNs, VTs and Ki-67 LI results were conducted to determine the correlation. Ki-67 LI increased significantly after 6 times of irradiation at irradiated daily group and after 3 times at irradiated every second day group, suggesting accelerated repopulation. No shrinkage of TV was noticed at two groups during irradiation delivery. Both 18F-FLT uptake and CTN increased significantly after irradiation of 12Gy/6f/6d and 6Gy/3f/6d. Comparison analysis found a significant relationship between Ki-67 LI and 18F-FLT uptake parameters as well as CTN. Both 18F-FLT PET and CT have the potential to reflect the tumor proliferative response during radiation delivery.
Collapse
|
14
|
Zschaeck S, Löck S, Leger S, Haase R, Bandurska-Luque A, Appold S, Kotzerke J, Zips D, Richter C, Gudziol V, Schreiber A, Zöphel K, Baumann M, Krause M. FDG uptake in normal tissues assessed by PET during treatment has prognostic value for treatment results in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas undergoing radiochemotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2017; 122:437-444. [PMID: 28222892 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2016] [Revised: 01/26/2017] [Accepted: 01/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Pronounced early side effects have been suggested to be a positive prognostic factor in patients undergoing chemo-radio-therapy (CRT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). We assessed the utility of positron emission tomography (PET) during treatment to analyze the correlation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in off target structures within the irradiated volume with outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS Two independent cohorts of patients with locally advanced HNSCC, both treated within prospective clinical imaging trials with curatively intended CRT were retrospectively analyzed. The exploratory cohort included 50, the independent validation cohort 26 patients. Uptake of FDG in mucosa and submucosal soft tissues (MST) as well as in other structures was assessed at week 4 during treatment. Considered endpoints were local tumor control (LC) and overall survival (OS). The prognostic value of FDG uptake on the endpoints was measured by the concordance index (ci) using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses based on the continuous variables of the exploratory cohort. RESULTS In the exploratory cohort FDG uptake in MST was prognostic for LC (hazard ratio HR=0.23, p=0.025) and OS (HR=0.30, p=0.003) in univariate analyses. These findings remained significant upon multivariate testing (LC HR=0.14, p=0.011; OS HR=0.20, p=0.001) and were confirmed in the validation cohort for LC (HR=0.15, p=0.034) and OS (HR=0.17, p=0.003). Also the SUVmean threshold of MST that was generated within the exploratory cohort (2.375) yielded significant differences in OS (p=0.006) and a statistical trend for LC (p=0.078) when applied to the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS FDG uptake in normal tissues within the irradiated volume measured by PET during treatment has significant prognostic value in HNSCC. This effect may potentially be of use for personalized treatment adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany.
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Biostatistics and Modeling in Radiation Oncology Group, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Leger
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany
| | - Robert Haase
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany
| | - Anna Bandurska-Luque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany
| | - Steffen Appold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Tübingen, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christian Richter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology Dresden, Germany
| | - Volker Gudziol
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Andreas Schreiber
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bednarek C, Nguyen T, Puyraveau M, Bonnet É, Lescut N, Azélie C, Miny J, Mauvais O, Maurina T, Tochet F, Bosset JF, Thariat J, Sun X. Implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancers in routine practice. Cancer Radiother 2017; 21:21-27. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.07.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
16
|
Gruber S, Dörr W. Tissue reactions to ionizing radiation—Oral mucosa. MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH 2016; 770:292-298. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Revised: 07/18/2016] [Accepted: 07/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
17
|
Selek U, Chang JY. Optimal sequencing of postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy in IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 2016; 8:1394-7. [PMID: 27500390 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.05.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ugur Selek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Koç University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey;; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Baumann M, Krause M, Overgaard J, Debus J, Bentzen SM, Daartz J, Richter C, Zips D, Bortfeld T. Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine. Nat Rev Cancer 2016; 16:234-49. [PMID: 27009394 DOI: 10.1038/nrc.2016.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 556] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Technological advances and clinical research over the past few decades have given radiation oncologists the capability to personalize treatments for accurate delivery of radiation dose based on clinical parameters and anatomical information. Eradication of gross and microscopic tumours with preservation of health-related quality of life can be achieved in many patients. Two major strategies, acting synergistically, will enable further widening of the therapeutic window of radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine: technology-driven improvement of treatment conformity, including advanced image guidance and particle therapy, and novel biological concepts for personalized treatment, including biomarker-guided prescription, combined treatment modalities and adaptation of treatment during its course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Bautzner Landstrasse 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Bautzner Landstrasse 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Jürgen Debus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg
- Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health and Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S Greene Street S9a03, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA
| | - Juliane Daartz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 1000 Blossom Street Cox 362, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA
| | - Christian Richter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium Tübingen, Postfach 2669, 72016 Tübingen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72016 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Bortfeld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 1000 Blossom Street Cox 362, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dou Y, Guo Y, Li X, Li X, Wang S, Wang L, Lv G, Zhang X, Wang H, Gong X, Chang J. Size-Tuning Ionization To Optimize Gold Nanoparticles for Simultaneous Enhanced CT Imaging and Radiotherapy. ACS NANO 2016; 10:2536-48. [PMID: 26815933 DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b07473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 189] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) contrast and radiosensitization usually increase with particle sizes of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), but there is a huge challenge to improve both by adjusting sizes under the requirements of in vivo application. Here, we report that AuNPs have great size-dependent enhancements on CT imaging as well as radiotherapy (RT) in the size range of 3-50 nm. It is demonstrated that AuNPs with a size of ∼13 nm could simultaneously possess superior CT contrast ability and significant radioactive disruption. The Monte Carlo method is further used to evaluate this phenomenon and indicates that the inhomogeneity of gold atom distributions caused by sizes may influence secondary ionization in whole X-ray interactions. In vivo studies further indicate that this optimally sized AuNP improves real-time CT imaging and radiotherapeutic inhibition of tumors in living mice by effective accumulation at tumors with prolonged in vivo circulation times compared to clinically used small-molecule agents. These results suggest that ∼13 nm AuNPs may serve as multifunctional adjuvants for clinical X-ray theranostic application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Dou
- School of Material Science and Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Tianjin University, Tianjin Engineering Center of Micro-Nano Biomaterials and Detection-Treatment Technology, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering , Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanyan Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University , Tianjin 300211, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaodong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University , Tianjin 300211, People's Republic of China
| | - Xue Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University , Tianjin 300211, People's Republic of China
| | - Sheng Wang
- School of Material Science and Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Tianjin University, Tianjin Engineering Center of Micro-Nano Biomaterials and Detection-Treatment Technology, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering , Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
| | - Lin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University , Tianjin 300211, People's Republic of China
| | - Guoxian Lv
- School of Material Science and Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Tianjin University, Tianjin Engineering Center of Micro-Nano Biomaterials and Detection-Treatment Technology, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering , Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuening Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University , Tianjin 300211, People's Republic of China
| | - Hanjie Wang
- School of Material Science and Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Tianjin University, Tianjin Engineering Center of Micro-Nano Biomaterials and Detection-Treatment Technology, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering , Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoqun Gong
- School of Material Science and Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Tianjin University, Tianjin Engineering Center of Micro-Nano Biomaterials and Detection-Treatment Technology, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering , Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
| | - Jin Chang
- School of Material Science and Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Tianjin University, Tianjin Engineering Center of Micro-Nano Biomaterials and Detection-Treatment Technology, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering , Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lattermann A, Baumann M, Krause M. Clinical trials for personalized glioblastoma radiotherapy: Markers for efficacy and late toxicity but often delayed treatment – Does that matter? Radiother Oncol 2016; 118:211-3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
21
|
Loureiro LVM, Victor EDS, Callegaro-Filho D, Koch LDO, Pontes LDB, Weltman E, Rother ET, Malheiros SMF. Minimizing the uncertainties regarding the effects of delaying radiotherapy for Glioblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2015; 118:1-8. [PMID: 26700603 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2015] [Revised: 10/28/2015] [Accepted: 11/25/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Previous studies have provided no clear conclusions regarding the effects of delaying radiotherapy (RT) in GBM patients. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis to address the effect of delayed RT on the overall survival (OS) of GBM patients. METHODS A systematic search retrieved 19 retrospective studies published between 1975 and 2014 reporting on the waiting time (WT) to RT for GBM patients. The meta-analysis was performed by converting WT to RT studies intervals into a regression coefficient (β) and standard error expressing the effect size on OS per week of delay. RESULTS Data required to calculate the effect size on OS per week of delay were available for 12 studies (5212 patients). A non-adjusted model and a meta-regression model based on well-recognized prognostic factors were performed. No association between WT to RT, per week of delay, and OS was found (HR=0.98; 95% CI 0.90-1.08; p=0.70). The meta-regression adjusted for prognostic factors weighted by the inverse-variance (1/SE(2)) showed no clear evidence of the effect of WT to RT, per week of delay, on OS. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis, despite limitations, provided no evidence of a true effect on OS by delaying RT in GBM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luiz Victor Maia Loureiro
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil; Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) - Escola Paulista de Medicina - Pós-graduação de Neurologia e Neurociências, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | | | | | | | | | - Eduardo Weltman
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Suzana Maria Fleury Malheiros
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil; Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) - Escola Paulista de Medicina - Pós-graduação de Neurologia e Neurociências, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jakobi A, Lühr A, Stützer K, Bandurska-Luque A, Löck S, Krause M, Baumann M, Perrin R, Richter C. Increase in Tumor Control and Normal Tissue Complication Probabilities in Advanced Head-and-Neck Cancer for Dose-Escalated Intensity-Modulated Photon and Proton Therapy. Front Oncol 2015; 5:256. [PMID: 26636038 PMCID: PMC4653282 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2015] [Accepted: 11/06/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Presently used radiochemotherapy regimens result in moderate local control rates for patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Dose escalation (DE) may be an option to improve patient outcome, but may also increase the risk of toxicities in healthy tissue. The presented treatment planning study evaluated the feasibility of two DE levels for advanced HNSCC patients, planned with either intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMXT) or proton therapy (IMPT). MATERIALS AND METHODS For 45 HNSCC patients, IMXT and IMPT treatment plans were created including DE via a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in the high-risk volume, while maintaining standard fractionation with 2 Gy per fraction in the remaining target volume. Two DE levels for the SIB were compared: 2.3 and 2.6 Gy. Treatment plan evaluation included assessment of tumor control probabilities (TCP) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP). RESULTS An increase of approximately 10% in TCP was estimated between the DE levels. A pronounced high-dose rim surrounding the SIB volume was identified in IMXT treatment. Compared to IMPT, this extra dose slightly increased the TCP values and to a larger extent the NTCP values. For both modalities, the higher DE level led only to a small increase in NTCP values (mean differences <2%) in all models, except for the risk of aspiration, which increased on average by 8 and 6% with IMXT and IMPT, respectively, but showed a considerable patient dependence. CONCLUSION Both DE levels appear applicable to patients with IMXT and IMPT since all calculated NTCP values, except for one, increased only little for the higher DE level. The estimated TCP increase is of relevant magnitude. The higher DE schedule needs to be investigated carefully in the setting of a prospective clinical trial, especially regarding toxicities caused by high local doses that lack a sound dose-response description, e.g., ulcers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Jakobi
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf , Dresden , Germany
| | - Armin Lühr
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf , Dresden , Germany ; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden , Dresden , Germany ; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) , Heidelberg , Germany
| | - Kristin Stützer
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf , Dresden , Germany
| | - Anna Bandurska-Luque
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf , Dresden , Germany ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden , Dresden , Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf , Dresden , Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf , Dresden , Germany ; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden , Dresden , Germany ; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) , Heidelberg , Germany ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden , Dresden , Germany ; Institute of Radiooncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf , Dresden , Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf , Dresden , Germany ; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden , Dresden , Germany ; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) , Heidelberg , Germany ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden , Dresden , Germany ; Institute of Radiooncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf , Dresden , Germany
| | - Rosalind Perrin
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf , Dresden , Germany
| | - Christian Richter
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf , Dresden , Germany ; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden , Dresden , Germany ; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) , Heidelberg , Germany ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden , Dresden , Germany ; Institute of Radiooncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf , Dresden , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Crop F, Lacornerie T, Mirabel X, Lartigau E. Workflow optimization for robotic stereotactic radiotherapy treatments: Application of Constant Work In Progress workflow. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.orhc.2015.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
24
|
Seidlitz A, Siepmann T, Löck S, Juratli T, Baumann M, Krause M. Impact of waiting time after surgery and overall time of postoperative radiochemotherapy on treatment outcome in glioblastoma multiforme. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:172. [PMID: 26276734 PMCID: PMC4554319 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0478-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2015] [Accepted: 07/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A time factor of radiooncological treatment has been demonstrated for several tumours, most prominently for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and lung cancer. In glioblastoma multiforme studies of the impact of postoperative waiting times before initiation of radio- or radiochemotherapy were inconclusive. Moreover analysis of the impact of overall treatment time of radiochemotherapy as well as overall duration of local treatment from surgery to the end of radiochemotherapy is lacking to date. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we included 369 consecutive patients treated at our institution between 2001 and 2014. Inclusion criteria were histologically proven glioblastoma multiforme, age ≥ 18 years, ECOG performance status 0–2 before radiotherapy, radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy with 33 × 1.8 Gy to 59.4 Gy or with 30 × 2.0 Gy to 60 Gy. The impact of postoperative waiting time, radiation treatment time and overall duration of local treatment from surgery to the end of radiotherapy on overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival were evaluated under consideration of known prognostic factors by univariate Log-rank tests and multivariate Cox-regression analysis. Results The majority of patients had received simultaneous and further adjuvant chemotherapy, mainly with temozolomide. Median survival time and 2-year OS were 18.0 months and 38.9 % after radiochemotherapy compared to 12.7 months and 12.6 % after radiotherapy alone. Median progression-free survival time was 7.5 months and PFS at 2 years was 14.3 % compared to 6.0 months and 3.3 %, respectively. Significant prognostic factors in multivariate analysis were age, resection status and application of simultaneous chemotherapy. No effect of the interval between surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (median 27, range 11–112 days), radiation treatment time (median 45, range 40–71 days) and of overall time from surgery until the end of radiotherapy (median 54, range 71–154 days) on overall and progression-free survival was evident. Conclusion Our data do not indicate a relevant time factor in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme in a large contemporary single-centre cohort. Although this study was limited by its retrospective nature, its results indicate that short delays of postoperative radiochemotherapy, e.g. for screening of a patient for a clinical trial, may be uncritical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annekatrin Seidlitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. .,OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Center for Clinical Research and Management Education, Division of Health Care Sciences, Dresden International University, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Timo Siepmann
- Center for Clinical Research and Management Education, Division of Health Care Sciences, Dresden International University, Dresden, Germany. .,Department of Neurology and Department of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Tareq Juratli
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Michael Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. .,OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. .,OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gomez DR, Liao KP, Swisher SG, Blumenschein GR, Erasmus JJ, Buchholz TA, Giordano SH, Smith BD. Time to treatment as a quality metric in lung cancer: Staging studies, time to treatment, and patient survival. Radiother Oncol 2015; 115:257-63. [PMID: 26013292 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2014] [Revised: 03/25/2015] [Accepted: 04/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prompt staging and treatment are crucial for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We determined if predictors of treatment delay after diagnosis were associated with prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Medicare claims from 28,732 patients diagnosed with NSCLC in 2004-2007 were used to establish the diagnosis-to-treatment interval (ideally ⩽35days) and identify staging studies during that interval. Factors associated with delay were identified with multivariate logistic regression, and associations between delay and survival by stage were tested with Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS Median diagnosis-to-treatment interval was 27days. Receipt of PET was associated with delays (57.4% of patients with PET delayed [n=6646/11,583] versus 22.8% of those without [n=3908/17,149]; adjusted OR=4.48, 95% CI 4.23-4.74, p<0.001). Median diagnosis-to-PET interval was 15days; PET-to-clinic, 5days; and clinic-to-treatment, 12days. Diagnosis-to-treatment intervals <35days were associated with improved survival for patients with localized disease and those with distant disease surviving ⩾1year but not for patients with distant disease surviving <1year. CONCLUSION Delays between diagnosing and treating NSCLC are common and associated with use of PET for staging. Reducing time to treatment may improve survival for patients with manageable disease at diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
| | - Kai-Ping Liao
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Stephen G Swisher
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - George R Blumenschein
- Department of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Jeremy J Erasmus
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Thomas A Buchholz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States; Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Clinical validation of FDG-PET/CT in the radiation treatment planning for patients with oesophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2014; 113:188-92. [PMID: 25467002 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2014] [Revised: 10/19/2014] [Accepted: 10/31/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this prospective study was to determine the proportion of locoregional recurrences (LRRs) that could have been prevented if radiotherapy treatment planning for oesophageal cancer was based on PET/CT instead of CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety oesophageal cancer patients, eligible for high dose (neo-adjuvant) (chemo)radiotherapy, were included. All patients underwent a planning FDG-PET/CT-scan. Radiotherapy target volumes (TVs) were delineated on CT and patients were treated according to the CT-based treatment plans. The PET images remained blinded. After treatment, TVs were adjusted based on PET/CT, when appropriate. Follow up included CT-thorax/abdomen every 6months. If LRR was suspected, a PET/CT was conducted and the site of recurrence was compared to the original TVs. If the LRR was located outside the CT-based clinical TV (CTV) and inside the PET/CT-based CTV, we considered this LRR possibly preventable. RESULTS Based on PET/CT, the gross tumour volume (GTV) was larger in 23% and smaller in 27% of the cases. In 32 patients (36%), >5% of the PET/CT-based GTV would be missed if the treatment planning was based on CT. The median follow up was 29months. LRRs were seen in 10 patients (11%). There were 3 in-field recurrences, 4 regional recurrences outside both CT-based and PET/CT-based CTV and 3 recurrences at the anastomosis without changes in TV by PET/CT; none of these recurrences were considered preventable by PET/CT. CONCLUSION No LRR was found after CT-based radiotherapy that could have been prevented by PET/CT. The value of PET/CT for radiotherapy seems limited.
Collapse
|
27
|
Gruber S, Schmidt M, Bozsaky E, Wolfram K, Haagen J, Habelt B, Puttrich M, Dörr W. Modulation of radiation-induced oral mucositis by pentoxifylline: Preclinical studies. Strahlenther Onkol 2014; 191:242-7. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-014-0775-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2014] [Accepted: 10/09/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
28
|
Yue JB, Yang J, Liu J, Lee J, Cabrera AR, Sun XD, Bai GH, Li YH, Yu JM. Histopathologic validation of 3′-deoxy-3′-18F-fluorothymidine PET for detecting tumor repopulation during fractionated radiotherapy of human FaDu squamous cell carcinoma in nude mice18F-FLT PET repopulation -->. Radiother Oncol 2014; 111:475-81. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2013] [Revised: 03/31/2014] [Accepted: 04/07/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
29
|
Effects of bone marrow or mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on oral mucositis (mouse) induced by fractionated irradiation. Strahlenther Onkol 2014; 190:399-404. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-013-0510-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2013] [Accepted: 11/08/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
30
|
Bütof R, Kirchner K, Appold S, Löck S, Rolle A, Höffken G, Krause M, Baumann M. Potential clinical predictors of outcome after postoperative radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2014; 190:263-9. [PMID: 24413893 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-013-0501-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2013] [Accepted: 11/06/2013] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this analysis was to investigate the impact of tumour-, treatment- and patient-related cofactors on local control and survival after postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with special focus on waiting and overall treatment times. PATIENTS AND METHODS For 100 NSCLC patients who had received postoperative radiotherapy, overall, relapse-free and metastases-free survival was retrospectively analysed using Kaplan-Meier methods. The impact of tumour-, treatment- and patient-related cofactors on treatment outcome was evaluated in uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS No statistically significant difference between the survival curves of the groups with a short versus a long time interval between surgery and radiotherapy could be shown in uni- or multivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant decrease in overall survival times for patients with prolonged overall radiotherapy treatment times exceeding 42 days (16 vs. 36 months) and for patients with radiation-induced pneumonitis (8 vs. 29 months). CONCLUSION Radiation-induced pneumonitis and prolonged radiation treatment times significantly reduced overall survival after adjuvant radiotherapy in NSCLC patients. The negative impact of a longer radiotherapy treatment time could be shown for the first time in an adjuvant setting. The hypothesis of a negative impact of longer waiting times prior to commencement of adjuvant radiotherapy could not be confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Bütof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Stage Migration in Planning PET/CT Scans in Patients Due to Receive Radiotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2014; 15:79-85. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2013.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2013] [Revised: 07/08/2013] [Accepted: 08/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
32
|
Billiet C, Decaluwé H, Peeters S, Vansteenkiste J, Dooms C, Haustermans K, De Leyn P, De Ruysscher D. Modern post-operative radiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer may improve local control and survival: a meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2013; 110:3-8. [PMID: 24100149 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2013] [Revised: 08/07/2013] [Accepted: 08/07/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We hypothesized that modern postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) could decrease local recurrence (LR) and improve overall survival (OS) in patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS To investigate the effect of modern PORT on LR and OS, we identified published phase III trials for PORT and stratified them according to use or non-use of linear accelerators. Non-individual patient data were used to model the potential benefit of modern PORT in stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC treated with induction chemotherapy and resection. RESULTS Of the PORT phase III studies, eleven trials (2387 patients) were included for OS analysis and eight (1677 patients) for LR. PORT decreased LR, whether given with cobalt, cobalt and linear accelerators, or with linear accelerators only. An increase in OS was only seen when PORT was given with linear accelerators, along with the most significant effect on LR (relative risk for LR and OS 0.31 (p=0.01) and 0.76 (p=0.02) for PORT vs. controls, respectively). Four trials (357 patients) were suitable to assess LR rates in stage III NSCLC treated with surgery, in most cases after induction chemotherapy. LR as first relapse was 30% (105/357) after 5 years. In the modeling part, PORT with linear accelerators was estimated to reduce LR rates to 10% as first relapse and to increase the absolute 5-year OS by 13%. CONCLUSIONS This modeling study generates the hypothesis that modern PORT may increase both LR and OS in stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC even in patients being treated with induction chemotherapy and surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Herbert Decaluwé
- Thoracic Surgery and Leuven Lung Cancer Group, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Johan Vansteenkiste
- Respiratory Oncology (Pneumology) and Leuven Lung Cancer Group, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christophe Dooms
- Respiratory Oncology (Pneumology) and Leuven Lung Cancer Group, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Paul De Leyn
- Thoracic Surgery and Leuven Lung Cancer Group, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Peitzsch C, Kurth I, Kunz-Schughart L, Baumann M, Dubrovska A. Discovery of the cancer stem cell related determinants of radioresistance. Radiother Oncol 2013; 108:378-87. [PMID: 23830195 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2013] [Revised: 05/31/2013] [Accepted: 06/05/2013] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Tumors are known to be heterogeneous containing a dynamic mixture of phenotypically and functionally different tumor cells. The two concepts attempting to explain the origin of intratumor heterogeneity are the cancer stem cell hypothesis and the clonal evolution model. The stochastic model argues that tumors are biologically homogenous and all cancer cells within the tumor have equal ability to propagate the tumor growth depending on continuing mutations and selective pressure. By contrast, the stem cells model suggests that cancer heterogeneity is due to the hierarchy that originates from a small population of cancer stem cells (CSCs) which are biologically distinct from the bulk tumor and possesses self-renewal, tumorigenic and multilineage potential. Although these two hypotheses have been discussed for a long time as mutually exclusive explanations of tumor heterogeneity, they are easily reconciled serving as a driving force of cancer evolution and diversity. Recent discovery of the cancer cell plasticity and heterogeneity makes the CSC population a moving target that could be hard to track and eradicate. Understanding the signaling mechanisms regulating CSCs during the course of cancer treatment can be indispensable for the optimization of current treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Peitzsch
- OncoRay National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, University Hospital/Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Clinical perspectives of cancer stem cell research in radiation oncology. Radiother Oncol 2013; 108:388-96. [PMID: 23830466 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2013] [Accepted: 06/06/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy has a proven potential to eradicate cancer stem cells which is reflected by its curative potential in many cancer types. Considerable progress has been made in identification and biological characterisation of cancer stem cells during the past years. Recent biological findings indicate significant inter- and intratumoural and functional heterogeneity of cancer stem cells and lead to more complex models which have potential implications for radiobiology and radiotherapy. Clinical evidence is emerging that biomarkers of cancer stem cells may be prognostic for the outcome of radiotherapy in some tumour entities. Perspectives of cancer stem cell based research for radiotherapy reviewed here include their radioresistance compared to the mass of non-cancer stem cells which form the bulk of all tumour cells, implications for image- and non-image based predictive bio-assays of the outcome of radiotherapy and a combination of novel systemic treatments with radiotherapy.
Collapse
|