1
|
Murphy B, Jackson A, Bass JK, Tsang DS, Ronckers CM, Kremer L, Baliga S, Olch A, Zureick AH, Jee KW, Constine LS, Yock TI. Modeling the Risk of Hearing Loss From Radiation Therapy in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:446-456. [PMID: 37855793 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) hearing loss (HL) task force reviewed investigations on cochlear radiation dose-response relationships and risk factors for developing HL. Evidence-based dose-response data are quantified to guide treatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic review of the literature was performed to correlate HL with cochlear dosimetry. HL was considered present if a threshold exceeded 20 dB at any frequency. Radiation dose, ototoxic chemotherapy exposure, hearing profile including frequency spectra, interval to HL, and age at radiation therapy (RT) were analyzed. RESULTS Literature was systematically reviewed from 1970 to 2021. This resulted in 739 abstracts; 19 met inclusion for meta-analysis, and 4 included data amenable to statistical modeling. These 4 studies included 457 cochleas at risk in patients treated with RT without chemotherapy, and 398 cochlea treated with chemotherapy. The incidence and severity of cochlear HL from RT exposure alone is related to dose and age. Risk of HL was <5% in cochlea receiving a mean dose ≤35 Gy but increased to 30% at 50 Gy. HL risk ranged from 25% to 40% in children under the age of 5 years at diagnosis, declining to 10% in older children for any radiation dose. Probability of similar severe HL occurred at doses 18.3 Gy higher for children <3 versus >3 years of age. High-frequency HL was most common, with average onset occurring 3.6 years (range, 0.4-13.2 years) after RT. Exposure to platinum-based chemotherapies added to the rates of HL at a given cochlear dose level, with 300 mg/m2 shifting the dose response by 7 Gy. CONCLUSIONS In children treated with RT alone, risk of HL was low for cochlear dose <35 Gy and rose when dose exceeded 35 Gy without clear RT dose dependence. High-frequency HL was most prevalent, but all frequencies were affected. Children younger than 5 years were at highest risk of developing HL, although independent effects of dose and age were not fully elucidated. Future reports with more granular data are needed to better delineate time to onset of HL and the effects of chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blair Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Doernbecher Children's Hospital, Portland, Oregon.
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Johnnie K Bass
- Rehabilitation Services, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Derek S Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cecile M Ronckers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Leontien Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Arthur Olch
- University of Southern California, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | - Louis S Constine
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Savagner J, Ducassou A, Cabarrou B, Hangard G, Gambart M, Bertozzi AI, Baudou E, Boetto S, Larrieu D, Laprie A. Helical tomotherapy craniospinal irradiation in primary brain tumours: Toxicities and outcomes in a peadiatric and adult population. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100777. [PMID: 38628594 PMCID: PMC11019098 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective As craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is delivered more frequently by helical tomotherapy (HT) with few reports about late effects, we analysed all patients treated in our centre over an 11-year period. Methods and materials Our study included all patients that underwent CSI by HT, between September 2009 and January 2020, in the Department of Radiation Oncology of the Toulouse Cancer Institute. Acute radiotherapy toxicities were reported and medium- to long-term outcomes analysed. Results Among the 79 patients included, 70.9 % were younger than 18 years at diagnosis, the median age was 13 (range: 1-52) at the time of radiation therapy, 67.1 % of patients had medulloblastoma. Half of them (49.4 %) had a metastatic disease at diagnosis. The median dose of CSI was 36 Gy (range, 18-36). Seventy-seven patients received a radiation boost to the original location of the primary tumour (97.5 %), 32 patients also received a boost to their metastatic sites (40.5 %). Median follow-up was 55.5 months (95 %CI = [41.2; 71.8]). The 3-year event-free survival rate was 66.3 % (95 %CI = [54.2; 75.9]). Most patients presented with acute haematological toxicities during CSI (85.9 %), predominantly severe thrombocytopenia (39.7 %). Among the 64 patients assessed for medium- and long-term outcomes, 52 survived and 47 were alive and disease-free at the latest follow-up visit on record. There were 3.8 % secondary tumours: two meningiomas and one diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Adult and paediatric patients respectively presented with secondary cataract (4.3 % vs 22.0 %), persistent hearing disorders (26.1 % vs 29.3 %), pulmonary or cardiac late effects (4.3 % vs 2.4 %), hormonal pituitary gland deficiencies (30.0 % vs 56.8 %) and psycho-cognitive disorders (56.5 % vs 53.7 %). Conclusion CSI dispensed by HT, did not result in any additional acute or late toxicities when compared to 3D-CSI. There was no increase in the secondary tumour rate compared to that reported in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Savagner
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Children’s Hospital of Toulouse, 330 Avenue de Grande Bretagne, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Ducassou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Toulouse Cancer Institute (IUCT), 1 avenue Irene Joliot-Curie, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Bastien Cabarrou
- Department of Biostatistics, Toulouse Cancer Institute (IUCT), 1 avenue Irene Joliot-Curie, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Gregory Hangard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Toulouse Cancer Institute (IUCT), 1 avenue Irene Joliot-Curie, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Marion Gambart
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Toulouse, 330 Avenue de Grande Bretagne, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - Anne-Isabelle Bertozzi
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Toulouse, 330 Avenue de Grande Bretagne, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - Eloise Baudou
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Children’s Hospital of Toulouse, 330 Avenue de Grande Bretagne, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - Sergio Boetto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Toulouse University Hospital, Pierre-Paul Riquet Hospital, Place du Docteur Baylac, Toulouse, France
| | - Delphine Larrieu
- Department of Oncology, Toulouse Cancer Institute (IUCT), 1 avenue Irene Joliot-Curie, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Laprie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Toulouse Cancer Institute (IUCT), 1 avenue Irene Joliot-Curie, 31100 Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wilson JS, Main C, Thorp N, Taylor RE, Majothi S, Kearns PR, English M, Dandapani M, Phillips R, Wheatley K, Pizer B. The effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children and young adults with Central Nervous System (CNS) tumours: a systematic review. J Neurooncol 2024; 167:1-34. [PMID: 38294638 PMCID: PMC10978619 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04510-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central nervous system (CNS) tumours account for around 25% of childhood neoplasms. With multi-modal therapy, 5-year survival is at around 75% in the UK. Conventional photon radiotherapy has made significant contributions to survival, but can be associated with long-term side effects. Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) reduces the volume of irradiated tissue outside the tumour target volume which may potentially reduce toxicity. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of PBT and make recommendations for future research for this evolving treatment. METHODS A systematic review assessing the effects of PBT for treating CNS tumours in children/young adults was undertaken using methods recommended by Cochrane and reported using PRISMA guidelines. Any study design was included where clinical and toxicity outcomes were reported. Searches were to May 2021, with a narrative synthesis employed. RESULTS Thirty-one case series studies involving 1731 patients from 10 PBT centres were included. Eleven studies involved children with medulloblastoma / primitive neuroectodermal tumours (n = 712), five ependymoma (n = 398), four atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour (n = 72), six craniopharyngioma (n = 272), three low-grade gliomas (n = 233), one germ cell tumours (n = 22) and one pineoblastoma (n = 22). Clinical outcomes were the most frequently reported with overall survival values ranging from 100 to 28% depending on the tumour type. Endocrine outcomes were the most frequently reported toxicity outcomes with quality of life the least reported. CONCLUSIONS This review highlights areas of uncertainty in this research area. A well-defined, well-funded research agenda is needed to best maximise the potential of PBT. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO-CRD42016036802.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayne S Wilson
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Caroline Main
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nicky Thorp
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK
- The Christie Hospital Foundation Trust Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Saimma Majothi
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Pamela R Kearns
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Martin English
- Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Madhumita Dandapani
- Children's Brain Tumour Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals' NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Robert Phillips
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), University of York, York, UK
| | - Keith Wheatley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Barry Pizer
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Matysiak WP, Landeweerd MC, Bannink A, van der Weide HL, Brouwer CL, Langendijk JA, Both S, Maduro JH. Proton PBS Planning Techniques, Robustness Evaluation, and OAR Sparing for the Whole-Brain Part of Craniospinal Axis Irradiation. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:892. [PMID: 38473254 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy is a promising modality for craniospinal irradiation (CSI), offering dosimetric advantages over conventional treatments. While significant attention has been paid to spine fields, for the brain fields, only dose reduction to the lens of the eye has been reported. Hence, the objective of this study is to assess the potential gains and feasibility of adopting different treatment planning techniques for the entire brain within the CSI target. To this end, eight previously treated CSI patients underwent retrospective replanning using various techniques: (1) intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) optimization, (2) the modification/addition of field directions, and (3) the pre-optimization removal of superficially placed spots. The target coverage robustness was evaluated and dose comparisons for lenses, cochleae, and scalp were conducted, considering potential biological dose increases. The target coverage robustness was maintained across all plans, with minor reductions when superficial spot removal was utilized. Single- and multifield optimization showed comparable target coverage robustness and organ-at-risk sparing. A significant scalp sparing was achieved in adults but only limited in pediatric cases. Superficial spot removal contributed to scalp V30 Gy reduction at the expense of lower coverage robustness in specific cases. Lens sparing benefits from multiple field directions, while cochlear sparing remains impractical. Based on the results, all investigated plan types are deemed clinically adoptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Witold P Matysiak
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiotherapy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Marieke C Landeweerd
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Agata Bannink
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hiska L van der Weide
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L Brouwer
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Both
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - John H Maduro
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Claude L, Bouter J, Le Quellenec G, Padovani L, Laprie A. Radiotherapy management of paediatric cancers with synchronous metastasis. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:131-140. [PMID: 37633767 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
Cancer in childhood represent 1% of all the new diagnosed cancers. About 30% of children with cancer receive radiation therapy, representing about 600 to 700 patients per year in France. As a consequence, paediatric cancers with synchronous metastasis is a very rare situation in oncology, with usually poor standard of care. However, considerable efforts are made by paediatric oncology scientific societies to offer trials or treatment consensus despite these rare situations. The article proposes to synthesize the radiotherapy management of both primary tumour and synchronous metastasis in the most "common" childhood or adolescent cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Claude
- Service de radiothérapie, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France.
| | - J Bouter
- Service de radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - G Le Quellenec
- Radiotherapy department, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest centre René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - L Padovani
- Oncology Radiotherapy Department, Aix-Marseille Université, CRCM Inserm, UMR1068, CNRS UMR7258, AMU UM105, Genome Instability and Carcinogenesis, Assistance publique des hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - A Laprie
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie, Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Khong J, Tee H, Gorayski P, Le H, Penniment M, Jessop S, Hansford J, Penfold M, Green J, Skelton K, Saran F. Proton beam therapy in paediatric cancer: Anticipating the opening of the Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023. [PMID: 38146017 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
Proton Beam Therapy (PBT) has the potential to improve paediatric cancer care by reducing radiation exposure and thus long-term toxicities. Ethical concerns and debates surrounding the treatment, such as eligibility and accessibility, are ongoing in Australia. The Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research (ABCPTR) (named after Sir William Henry Bragg who described the Bragg peak in his laboratory at the University of Adelaide in 1903) aims to increase access to PBT in Australasia and offer a patient-centred care approach. Research is underway to assess PBT's safety and cost-effectiveness, using tools including Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) models. Collaborative efforts are focused on developing tailored survivorship clinics to enhance patient follow-up and quality of life. With the anticipated opening of the ABCPTR, Australia is preparing to take a significant step in radiation oncology, offering new research opportunities and creating a publicly funded treatment centre. The initiative aims to balance treatment efficacy with patient care, setting the stage for a future in which radiation therapy will reduce long-term side effects compared to the current standard of care. The implementation of PBT in Australia represents a complex and promising approach to paediatric oncology. This article provides an overview of the current landscape, highlighting the potential benefits and challenges of a treatment that could redefine the quality of survivorship and contribute to global research and best clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Khong
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Hui Tee
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Peter Gorayski
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Allied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Hien Le
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Allied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Michael Penniment
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sophie Jessop
- Michael Rice Centre for Haematology and Oncology, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jordan Hansford
- South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Michael Rice Centre for Haematology and Oncology, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- South Australia ImmunoGenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Melanie Penfold
- South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Julia Green
- South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Kelly Skelton
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Allied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Frank Saran
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Allied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu KX, Haas-Kogan DA, Elhalawani H. Radiotherapy for Primary Pediatric Central Nervous System Malignancies: Current Treatment Paradigms and Future Directions. Pediatr Neurosurg 2023; 58:356-366. [PMID: 37703864 DOI: 10.1159/000533777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central nervous system tumors are the most common solid tumors in childhood. Treatment paradigms for pediatric central nervous system malignancies depend on elements including tumor histology, age of patient, and stage of disease. Radiotherapy is an important modality of treatment for many pediatric central nervous system malignancies. SUMMARY While radiation contributes to excellent overall survival rates for many patients, radiation also carries significant risks of long-term side effects including neurocognitive decline, hearing loss, growth impairment, neuroendocrine dysfunction, strokes, and secondary malignancies. In recent decades, clinical trials have demonstrated that with better imaging and staging along with more sophisticated radiation planning and treatment set-up verification, smaller treatment volumes can be utilized without decrement in survival. Furthermore, the development of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and proton-beam radiotherapy has greatly improved conformality of radiation. KEY MESSAGES Recent changes in radiation treatment paradigms have decreased risks of short- and long-term toxicity for common histologies and in different age groups. Future studies will continue to develop novel radiation regimens to improve outcomes in aggressive central nervous system tumors, integrate molecular subtypes to tailor radiation treatment, and decrease radiation-associated toxicity for long-term survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin X Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daphne A Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hesham Elhalawani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Huang Y, Zhou H, An F, Zhao A, Wu J, Wang M, Luo J. The relevance of ototoxicity induced by radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:95. [PMID: 37270526 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02268-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of ototoxicity, characterized by hearing impairment, tinnitus, or middle ear inflammation, is elevated in both child and adult cancer survivors who have undergone head-neck or brain radiation, or a combination of the two. To provide optimal care for these cancer survivors and minimize subsequent complications, it is crucial to comprehend the relationship between radiotherapy and ototoxicity. METHODS A comprehensive search of databases, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, was conducted from the inception of the knowledge base up until January 2023. The metafor-package was employed to compare ototoxicity rates in individuals receiving radiotherapy. Two independent assessors extracted data and analyzed targets using a random-effects model. RESULTS Out of the 28 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in the analysis, 25 were prospective RCTs. Subgroup analysis revealed that mean cochlear radiation dose, primary tumor location, radiotherapy modality, and patient age significantly influenced total hearing impairment. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was associated with less ototoxicity than 2D conventional radiotherapy (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.47-0.60; P = 0.73; I2 = 0%). Stereotactic radiotherapy appeared to be a superior option for hearing preservation compared to radiosurgery (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.00-2.07; P = 0.69; I2 = 0%). Children demonstrated a higher risk of hearing impairment than adults. More than 50% of patients with vestibular neuroadenoma experienced hearing impairment following radiation therapy. A strong association was observed between the average cochlear radiation dose and hearing impairment. Increased cochlear radiation doses may result in a heightened risk of hearing impairment. CONCLUSION Several risk factors for radiation-induced hearing impairment were identified in this study. High cochlear radiation doses were found to exacerbate the risk of hearing impairment resulting from radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Huang
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou Second People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Hong Zhou
- Department of Otolaryngology, Shidong Hospital, Yangpu District, Shidong Hospital Affiliated to University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Fenglan An
- The Third Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lingcheng, Dezhou, Shandong Province, China
| | - Aimei Zhao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dongchangfu Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Liaocheng, Liaocheng, China
| | - Jian Wu
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China
| | - Meihua Wang
- Department of Pathology, Changzhou Tumor Hospital, Changzhou, China.
| | - Judong Luo
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Changzhou Second People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen Z, Dominello MM, Joiner MC, Burmeister JW. Proton versus photon radiation therapy: A clinical review. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1133909. [PMID: 37064131 PMCID: PMC10091462 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1133909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
While proton radiation therapy offers substantially better dose distribution characteristics than photon radiation therapy in certain clinical applications, data demonstrating a quantifiable clinical advantage is still needed for many treatment sites. Unfortunately, the number of patients treated with proton radiation therapy is still comparatively small, in some part due to the lack of evidence of clear benefits over lower-cost photon-based treatments. This review is designed to present the comparative clinical outcomes between proton and photon therapies, and to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge regarding the effectiveness of proton radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Chen
- School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- *Correspondence: Zhe Chen,
| | - Michael M. Dominello
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Michael C. Joiner
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Jay W. Burmeister
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gaito S, Hwang EJ, France A, Aznar MC, Burnet N, Crellin A, Holtzman AL, Indelicato DJ, Timmerman B, Whitfield GA, Smith E. Outcomes of Patients Treated in the UK Proton Overseas Programme: Central Nervous System Group. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:283-291. [PMID: 36804292 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
AIMS In 2008, the UK National Health Service started the Proton Overseas Programme (POP), to provide access for proton beam therapy (PBT) abroad for selected tumour diagnoses while two national centres were being planned. The clinical outcomes for the patient group treated for central nervous system (CNS), base of skull, spinal and paraspinal malignancies are reported here. MATERIALS AND METHODS Since the start of the POP, an agreement between the National Health Service and UK referring centres ensured outcomes data collection, including overall survival, local tumour control and late toxicity data. Clinical and treatment-related data were extracted from this national patient database. Grade ≥3 late toxicities were reported following Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.0 definition, occurring later than 90 days since the completion of treatment. RESULTS Between 2008 and September 2020, 830 patients were treated within the POP for the above listed malignancies. Overall survival data were available for 815 patients and local control data for 726 patients. Toxicity analysis was carried out on 702 patients, with patients excluded due to short follow-up (<90 days) and/or inadequate toxicity data available. After a median follow-up of 3.34 years (0.06-11.58), the overall survival was 91.2%. The local control rate was 85.9% after a median follow-up of 2.81 years (range 0.04-11.58). The overall grade ≥3 late toxicity incidence was 11.97%, after a median follow-up of 1.72 years (0.04-8.45). The median radiotherapy prescription dose was 54 GyRBE (34.8-79.2). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study indicate the safety of PBT for CNS tumours. Preliminary clinical outcomes following PBT for paediatric/teen and young adult and adult CNS tumours treated within the POP are encouraging, which reflects accurate patient selection and treatment quality. The rate of late effects compares favourably with published cohorts. Clinical outcomes from this patient cohort will be compared with those of UK-treated patients since the start of the national PBT service in 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gaito
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - E J Hwang
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - A France
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - M C Aznar
- Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - N Burnet
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - A Crellin
- Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; NHS England National Clinical Lead Proton Beam Therapy, UK
| | - A L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - D J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - B Timmerman
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
| | - G A Whitfield
- Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - E Smith
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mak DY, Siddiqui Z, Liu ZA, Dama H, MacDonald SM, Wu S, Murphy ES, Hall MD, Malkov V, Onar-Thomas A, Ahmed S, Dhall G, Tsang DS. Photon versus proton whole ventricular radiotherapy for non-germinomatous germ cell tumors: A report from the Children's Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69:e29697. [PMID: 35373903 PMCID: PMC9329212 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine if proton therapy reduces doses to cranial organs at risk (OARs) as compared to photon therapy in children with non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCT) receiving whole ventricular radiotherapy (WVRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Dosimetric data for patients with NGGCT prospectively enrolled in stratum 1 of the Children's Oncology Group study ACNS1123 who received 30.6 Gy WVRT were compared. Target segmentation was standardized using a contouring atlas. Doses to cranial OARs were compared between proton and photon treatments. Clinically relevant dose-volume parameters that were analyzed included mean dose and dose to 40% of the OAR volume (D40). RESULTS Mean and D40 doses to the supratentorial brain, cerebellum, and bilateral temporal, parietal, and frontal lobes were statistically significantly lower amongst proton-treated patients, as compared to photon-treated patients. In a subgroup analysis of patients uniformly treated with a 3-mm planning target volume, patients who received proton therapy continued to have statistically significantly lower doses to brain OARs. CONCLUSIONS Children treated with proton therapy for WVRT had lower doses to normal brain structures, when compared to those treated with photon therapy. Proton therapy should be considered for patients receiving WVRT for NGGCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Y. Mak
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Zain Siddiqui
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston, Ontario
| | - Zhihui Amy Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Hitesh Dama
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Shannon M. MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shengjie Wu
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Erin S. Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Matthew D. Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Victor Malkov
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Arzu Onar-Thomas
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Sameera Ahmed
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Girish Dhall
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Blood & Marrow Transplantation, Children's of Alabama, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Derek S. Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bachtiary B, Veraguth D, Roos N, Pfiffner F, Leiser D, Pica A, Walser M, von Felten S, Weber DC. Hearing Loss in Cancer Patients with Skull Base Tumors Undergoing Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14163853. [PMID: 36010847 PMCID: PMC9405884 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
To assess the incidence and severity of changes in hearing threshold in patients undergoing high-dose pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT). This retrospective cohort study included fifty-one patients (median 50 years (range, 13–68)) treated with PBS-PT for skull base tumors. No chemotherapy was delivered. Pure tone averages (PTAs)were determined before (baseline) and after PBS-PT as the average hearing thresholds at frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz. Hearing changes were calculated as PTA differences between pre-and post-PBS-PT. A linear mixed-effects model was used to assess the relationship between the PTA at the follow-up and the baseline, the cochlea radiation dose intensity, the increased age, and the years after PBS-PT. Included patients were treated for chordoma (n = 24), chondrosarcoma (n = 9), head and neck tumors (n = 9), or meningioma (n = 3), with a mean tumor dose of 71.1 Gy (RBE) (range, 52.0–77.8), and a mean dose of 37 Gy (RBE) (range, 0.0–72.7) was delivered to the cochleas. The median time to the first follow-up was 11 months (IQR, 5.5–33.7). The PTA increased from a median of 15 dB (IQR 10.0–25) at the baseline to 23.8 (IQR 11.3–46.3) at the first follow-up. In the linear mixed-effect model, the baseline PTA (estimate 0.80, 95%CI 0.64 to 0.96, p ≤ 0.001), patient’s age (0.30, 0.03 to 0.57, p = 0.029), follow-up time (2.07, 0.92 to 3.23, p ≤ 0.001), and mean cochlear dose in Gy (RBE) (0.34, 0.21 to 0.46, p ≤ 0.001) were all significantly associated with an increase in PTA at follow-up. The applied cochlear dose and baseline PTA, age, and time after treatment were significantly associated with hearing loss after proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Bachtiary
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +41-56-310-2319
| | - Dorothe Veraguth
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolaas Roos
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Flurin Pfiffner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dominic Leiser
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Alessia Pica
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Marc Walser
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Stefanie von Felten
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Damien C. Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Franceschi E, Giannini C, Furtner J, Pajtler KW, Asioli S, Guzman R, Seidel C, Gatto L, Hau P. Adult Medulloblastoma: Updates on Current Management and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153708. [PMID: 35954372 PMCID: PMC9367316 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Medulloblastoma (MB) is a malignant embryonal tumor of the posterior fossa belonging to the family of primitive neuro-ectodermic tumors (PNET). MB generally occurs in pediatric age, but in 14–30% of cases, it affects the adults, mostly below the age of 40, with an incidence of 0.6 per million per year, representing about 0.4–1% of tumors of the nervous system in adults. Unlike pediatric MB, robust prospective trials are scarce for the post-puberal population, due to the low incidence of MB in adolescent and young adults. Thus, current MB treatments for older patients are largely extrapolated from the pediatric experience, but the transferability and applicability of these paradigms to adults remain an open question. Adult MB is distinct from MB in children from a molecular and clinical perspective. Here, we review the management of adult MB, reporting the recent published literature focusing on the effectiveness of upfront chemotherapy, the development of targeted therapies, and the potential role of a reduced dose of radiotherapy in treating this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Franceschi
- Nervous System Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Caterina Giannini
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 59005, USA;
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Julia Furtner
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Kristian W. Pajtler
- Hopp Children’s Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sofia Asioli
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
- Pituitary Unit, IRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche Di Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy
| | - Raphael Guzman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland;
| | - Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Lidia Gatto
- Department of Oncology, AUSL of Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Peter Hau
- Wilhelm Sander NeuroOncology Unit & Department of Neurology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93055 Regensburg, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ruggi A, Melchionda F, Sardi I, Pavone R, Meneghello L, Kitanovski L, Zaletel LZ, Farace P, Zucchelli M, Scagnet M, Toni F, Righetto R, Cianchetti M, Prete A, Greto D, Cammelli S, Morganti AG, Rombi B. Toxicity and Clinical Results after Proton Therapy for Pediatric Medulloblastoma: A Multi-Centric Retrospective Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2747. [PMID: 35681727 PMCID: PMC9179586 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in children. Even if current treatment dramatically improves the prognosis, survivors often develop long-term treatment-related sequelae. The current radiotherapy standard for medulloblastoma is craniospinal irradiation with a boost to the primary tumor site and to any metastatic sites. Proton therapy (PT) has similar efficacy compared to traditional photon-based radiotherapy but might achieve lower toxicity rates. We report on our multi-centric experience with 43 children with medulloblastoma (median age at diagnosis 8.7 years, IQR 6.6, M/F 23/20; 26 high-risk, 14 standard-risk, 3 ex-infant), who received active scanning PT between 2015 and 2021, with a focus on PT-related acute-subacute toxicity, as well as some preliminary data on late toxicity. Most acute toxicities were mild and manageable with supportive therapy. Hematological toxicity was limited, even among HR patients who underwent hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation before PT. Preliminary data on late sequelae were also encouraging, although a longer follow-up is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Ruggi
- Specialty School of Paediatrics-Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Fraia Melchionda
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology, IRCCS Sant’Orsola SSD, University Hospital of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (F.M.); (A.P.)
| | - Iacopo Sardi
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Meyer Children’s Hospital, 50139 Florence, Italy; (I.S.); (R.P.)
| | - Rossana Pavone
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Meyer Children’s Hospital, 50139 Florence, Italy; (I.S.); (R.P.)
| | - Linda Meneghello
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology Service, Pediatric Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, 38123 Trento, Italy;
| | - Lidija Kitanovski
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
| | | | - Paolo Farace
- Proton Therapy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), 38123 Trento, Italy; (P.F.); (R.R.); (M.C.)
| | - Mino Zucchelli
- Pediatric Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurological Science, IRCCS Bellaria Hospital, 40139 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Mirko Scagnet
- Department of Neurosurgery, Meyer Children’s Hospital, 50139 Florence, Italy;
| | - Francesco Toni
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Roberto Righetto
- Proton Therapy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), 38123 Trento, Italy; (P.F.); (R.R.); (M.C.)
| | - Marco Cianchetti
- Proton Therapy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), 38123 Trento, Italy; (P.F.); (R.R.); (M.C.)
| | - Arcangelo Prete
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology, IRCCS Sant’Orsola SSD, University Hospital of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (F.M.); (A.P.)
| | - Daniela Greto
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy;
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.C.); (A.G.M.)
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.C.); (A.G.M.)
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Barbara Rombi
- Proton Therapy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), 38123 Trento, Italy; (P.F.); (R.R.); (M.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
The Alliance AMBUSH Trial: Rationale and Design. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020414. [PMID: 35053576 PMCID: PMC8773887 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Medulloblastoma, the most common embryonal tumor in children, can also arise in older patients. Clinical studies in children with medulloblastoma have increased our understanding of molecular pathways and improved treatment strategies. We now know that medulloblastoma has at least four subtypes and each maybe best suited to specific therapies. The sonic hedgehog (SHH) pathway is altered in a significant proportion of older patients with medulloblastoma. The Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology cooperative group is developing the AMBUSH trial: Comprehensive Management of Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) and Adult Patients with Medulloblastoma or Pineal Embryonal Tumors With A Randomized Placebo Controlled Phase II Focusing on Sonic Hedgehog Pathway Inhibition in SHH Subgroup Patients (Adult & Adolescent MedulloBlastoma Using Sonic Hedgehog Trial). The trial gives treatment directions for all patients and randomizes patients with average risk SHH-activated medulloblastoma to maintenance sonidegib, a hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor, or placebo. This trial will establish a baseline for future trial comparison and investigate the benefit of a novel targeted agent. Abstract Unlike medulloblastoma (MB) in children, robust prospective trials have not taken place for older patients due to the low incidence of MB in adults and adolescent and young adults (AYA). Current MB treatment paradigms for older patients have been extrapolated from the pediatric experience even though questions exist about the applicability of these approaches. Clinical and molecular classification of MB now provides better prognostication and is being incorporated in pediatric therapeutic trials. It has been established that genomic alterations leading to activation of the sonic hedgehog (SHH) pathway occur in approximately 60% of MB in patients over the age of 16 years. Within this cohort, protein patched homolog (PTCH) and smoothened (SMO) mutations are commonly found. Among patients whose tumors harbor the SHH molecular signature, it is estimated that over 80% of patients could respond to SHH pathway inhibitors. Given the advances in the understanding of molecular subgroups and the lack of robust clinical data for adult/AYA MB, the Alliance for Clinical Trial in Oncology group developed the AMBUSH trial: Comprehensive Management of AYA and Adult Patients with Medulloblastoma or Pineal Embryonal Tumors with a Randomized Placebo Controlled Phase II Focusing on Sonic Hedgehog Pathway Inhibition in SHH Subgroup Patients (Adult & Adolescent MedulloBlastoma Using Sonic Hedgehog Trial). This trial will enroll patients 18 years of age or older with MB (any molecular subgroup and risk stratification) or pineal embryonal tumor. Patients will be assigned to one of three cohorts: (1) average risk non-SHH-MB, (2) average risk SHH-MB, and (3) high risk MB or pineal embryonal tumors. All patients will receive protocol-directed comprehensive treatment with radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Patients with SHH-MB in cohort 1 will be randomized to a smoothened inhibitor or placebo as maintenance therapy for one year.
Collapse
|
16
|
Keilty D, Khandwala M, Liu ZA, Papaioannou V, Bouffet E, Hodgson D, Yee R, Cushing S, Laperriere N, Ahmed S, Mabbott D, Ramaswamy V, Tabori U, Huang A, Bartels U, Tsang DS. Hearing Loss After Radiation and Chemotherapy for CNS and Head-and-Neck Tumors in Children. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:3813-3821. [PMID: 34570616 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Hearing loss (HL) is a serious secondary effect of treatment for CNS and head-and-neck tumors in children. The goal of this study was to evaluate incidence and risk factors for HL in patients with multiple ototoxic exposures. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated 340 ears from 171 patients with CNS or head-and-neck tumors treated with radiation, with or without chemotherapy, who had longitudinal audiologic evaluation. International Society of Pediatric Oncology-Boston grades were assigned to 2,420 hearing assessments. Multivariable weighted ordinal logistic regression was fitted to evaluate the effect of clinicopathologic features on HL. RESULTS Mean cochlea dose (odds ratio [OR] 1.04 per Gy, P < .001), time since radiotherapy (RT; OR 1.21 per year, P < .001), cisplatin dose (OR 1.48 per 100 mg/m2, P < .001), and carboplatin dose (OR 1.41 per 1,000 mg/m2, P = .002) were associated with increasing International Society of Pediatric Oncology-Boston grade of HL. There was no synergistic effect of RT and cisplatin (interaction term, P = .53) or RT and carboplatin (interaction term, P = .85). Cumulative incidence of high-frequency HL (> 4 kHz) was 50% or greater at 5 years after RT if mean cochlea dose was > 30 Gy, while incidence of HL across all frequencies continued to increase beyond 5 years after RT. CONCLUSION Children treated with radiation and chemotherapy experience a high incidence of HL over time, with associations found between more severe HL and cisplatin or carboplatin dose as well as mean cochlea dose. Mean cochlea dose of ≤ 30 Gy is proposed as a goal to reduce the risk of HL; a lower threshold (20-25 Gy) may be considered in patients receiving platinum chemotherapy to reduce cumulative HL burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Keilty
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mohammad Khandwala
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zhihui Amy Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vicky Papaioannou
- Department of Communication Disorders, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eric Bouffet
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Hodgson
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ryan Yee
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sharon Cushing
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Normand Laperriere
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sameera Ahmed
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Donald Mabbott
- Department of Psychology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vijay Ramaswamy
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Uri Tabori
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Annie Huang
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ute Bartels
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Derek S Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Seidel C, Heider S, Hau P, Glasow A, Dietzsch S, Kortmann RD. Radiotherapy in Medulloblastoma-Evolution of Treatment, Current Concepts and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13235945. [PMID: 34885055 PMCID: PMC8657317 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is the backbone of medulloblastoma treatment and the first treatment to achieve a cure in many patients. Within the last decades, significant efforts have been made to enhance efficacy in combination with chemotherapy. With this approach, a majority of low- and standard-risk patients can be cured. In parallel, many clinical trials have dealt with CSI-dose reduction and reduction of boost volume in order to decrease long-term toxicity, particularly neurotoxicity. Within these trials, standardized quality assurance has helped to increase the accuracy of treatment and improve prognosis. More recently, advances of radiotherapy techniques such as proton treatment allowed for better sparing of healthy tissue in order to further diminish detrimental long-term effects. Major future challenges are the adaption of radiotherapy regimens to different molecularly defined disease groups alone or together with new targeted agents. Moreover, and even more importantly, innovative combinatorial treatments are needed in high- and very-high risk situations. Abstract Medulloblastoma is the most frequent malignant brain tumor in children. During the last decades, the therapeutic landscape has changed significantly with craniospinal irradiation as the backbone of treatment. Survival times have increased and treatments were stratified according to clinical and later molecular risk factors. In this review, current evidence regarding the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy in medulloblastoma is summarized and discussed mainly based on data of controlled trials. Current concepts and future perspectives based on current risk classification are outlined. With the introduction of CSI, medulloblastoma has become a curable disease. Due to combination with chemotherapy, survival rates have increased significantly, allowing for a reduction in radiation dose and a decrease of toxicity in low- and standard-risk patients. Furthermore, modern radiotherapy techniques are able to avoid side effects in a fragile patient population. However, high-risk patients remain with relevant mortality and many patients still suffer from treatment related toxicity. Treatment needs to be continually refined with regard to more efficacious combinatorial treatment in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Sina Heider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
| | - Peter Hau
- Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany;
| | - Annegret Glasow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
| | - Stefan Dietzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
| | - Rolf-Dieter Kortmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yip PL, Mok KCJ, Ho HS, Lee WYV, Wong ACL, Lau CT, Wong FCS, Yeung KW, Lee SF. Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Survivors in the Modern Treatment Era - The Early and Late Effects of Radiation and Cisplatin. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 34:e160-e167. [PMID: 34772581 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Hearing loss is a common debilitating complication in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) survivors. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of inner ear/cochlear radiation dose and cisplatin use on early and late sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in NPC patients treated with radiotherapy alone, concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) and induction chemotherapy followed by cCRT (iCRT) in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study included 81 NPC patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy between 2014 and 2016. Pure tone audiometry was carried out at baseline and follow-up. The effects of cochlear/inner ear radiation and cisplatin doses on early (<12 months) and late (≥24 months) SNHL were analysed using multivariable regression after adjusting for important predictors. RESULTS In total, 156 ears were examined. In early SNHL (n = 136), cisplatin use predicted the incidence of early high-frequency SHNL (HF-SNHL) (odds ratio 6.4, 95% confidence interval 1.7-23.9, P = 0.005). Ninety ears were analysed for late SNHL (median follow-up 38 months). Inner ear/cochlear radiation and cisplatin doses and better pre-treatment hearing were independent predictors of threshold change at 4 kHz. Every 10 Gy increase in inner ear/cochlear Dmean resulted in 5-dB and 6-dB threshold changes, respectively (cochlear Dmean: B = 0.005, 95% confidence interval 0.0004-0.009, P = 0.031; inner ear Dmean: B = 0.006, 95% confidence interval 0.001-0.010, P = 0.014). Cisplatin use was associated with late HF-SNHL (odds ratio 3.74, 95% confidence interval 1.1-12.3, P = 0.031). In the cCRT and iCRT subgroups, no cisplatin dose-dependent ototoxicity was observed. Severe (≥30 dB) late HF-SNHL occurred in 14% and 25% of the patients when the cochlear dose constraints were 40 Gy and 44 Gy, respectively. The radiotherapy-alone group did not develop severe late HF-SNHL. CONCLUSION Cochlear/inner ear radiation dose and cisplatin use showed differential and independent ototoxicity in early and late SNHL. As cochlear/inner ear dose-dependent ototoxicity was demonstrated, the cochlear dose constraint should be as low as reasonably achievable, especially when cisplatin is also administered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P L Yip
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong
| | - K C J Mok
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong
| | - H S Ho
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong
| | - W Y V Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong
| | - A C L Wong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong
| | - C T Lau
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong
| | - F C S Wong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong
| | - K W Yeung
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong
| | - S F Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong; Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bär E, Collins-Fekete CA, Rompokos V, Zhang Y, Gaze MN, Warry A, Poynter A, Royle G. Assessment of the impact of CT calibration procedures for proton therapy planning on pediatric treatments. Med Phys 2021; 48:5202-5218. [PMID: 34174092 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Relative stopping powers (RSPs) for proton therapy are estimated using single-energy computed tomography (SECT), calibrated with standardized tissues of the adult male. It is assumed that those tissues are representative of tissues of all age and sex. Female, male, and pediatric tissues differ from one another in density and composition. In this study, we use tabulated pediatric tissues and computational phantoms to investigate the impact of this assumption on pediatric proton therapy. The potential of dual-energy CT (DECT) to improve the accuracy of these calculations is explored. METHODS We study 51 human body tissues, categorized into male/female for the age groups newborn, 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year-old children, and adult, with given compositions and densities. CT numbers are simulated and RSPs are estimated using SECT and DECT methods. Estimated tissue RSPs from each method are compared to theoretical RSPs. The dose and range errors of each approach are evaluated on three computational phantoms (Ewing's sarcoma, salivary sarcoma, and glioma) derived from pediatric proton therapy patients. RESULTS With SECT, soft tissues have mean estimation errors and standard deviation up to (1.96 ± 4.18)% observed in newborns, compared to (0.20 ± 1.15)% in adult males. Mean estimation errors for bones are up to (-3.35 ± 4.76)% in pediatrics as opposed to (0.10 ± 0.66)% in adult males. With DECT, mean errors reduce to (0.17 ± 0.13)% and (0.23 ± 0.22)% in newborns (soft tissues/bones). With SECT, dose errors in a Ewing's sarcoma phantom are exceeding 5 Gy (10% of prescribed dose) at the distal end of the treatment field, with volumes of dose errors >5 Gy ofV diff > 5 = 4630.7 mm3 . Similar observations are made in the head and neck phantoms, with overdoses to healthy tissue exceeding 2 Gy (4%). A systematic Bragg peak shift resulting in either over- or underdosage of healthy tissues and target volumes depending on the crossed tissues RSP prediction errors is observed. Water equivalent range errors of single beams are between -1.53 and 5.50 mm (min, max) (Ewing's sarcoma phantom), -0.78 and 3.62 mm (salivary sarcoma phantom), and -0.43 and 1.41 mm (glioma phantom). DECT can reduce dose errors to <1 Gy and range errors to <1 mm. CONCLUSION Single-energy computed tomography estimates RSPs for pediatric tissues with systematic shifts. DECT improves the accuracy of RSPs and dose distributions in pediatric tissues compared to the SECT calibration curve based on adult male tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Bär
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Vasilis Rompokos
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark N Gaze
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alison Warry
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew Poynter
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gary Royle
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Reduce Patient Treatment wait time in a Proton Beam Facility - A Gatekeeper Approach. J Med Syst 2021; 45:80. [PMID: 34258667 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-021-01756-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Patient wait time can negatively impact treatment quality in a proton therapy center, where multiple treatment rooms share one proton beam. Wait time increases patient discomfort that can lead to patient motion, dissatisfaction, and longer treatment delay. This study was to develop a patient call-back model that reduced patient wait while efficiently utilizing the proton beam. A "Gatekeeper" logic allowing therapists to adjust the time of a patient's call-back to the treatment room was developed. It uses a two-pronged approach to minimize overlap of long treatment and the possibility of excessive wait in the queue to receive the proton beam. The goal was to reduce the maximum wait time to less than eight minutes per field for a four-room facility. The effectiveness of this logic was evaluated through simulation, and five scenarios were compared. Four scenarios implementing various levels of gatekeeper logic were compared with the original scenario without the logic. The best performing model provided a reduction of the maximum field wait by 26% and met the predefined goal. Adjusting call-back extended the treatment day length by an average of 6 min and a maximum of 12 min in total. The use of this gatekeeper logic significantly reduces patient field wait with minimal impact on treatment day length for a four-room proton facility. A sample interface that adopts this logic for therapists to make informed decision on patient call-back time is demonstrated.
Collapse
|
21
|
Dell'Oro M, Short M, Wilson P, Bezak E. Normal tissue tolerance amongst paediatric brain tumour patients- current evidence in proton radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 164:103415. [PMID: 34242771 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy (PT) is used increasingly for paediatric brain cancer patients. However, as demonstrated here, the knowledge on normal tissue dose constraints, to minimize side-effects, for this cohort is limited. METHODS A search strategy was systematically conducted on MEDLINE® database. 65 papers were evaluated ranging from 2013 to 2021. RESULTS Large variations in normal tissue tolerance and toxicity reporting across PT studies makes estimation of normal tissue dose constraints difficult, with the potential for significant late effects to go unmeasured. Mean dose delivered to the pituitary gland varies from 20 to 30 Gy across literature. Similarly, the hypothalamic dose delivery ranges from 20 to 54.6 Gy for paediatric patients. CONCLUSION There is a significant lack of radiobiological data for paediatric brain cancer patients undergoing proton therapy, often using data from x-ray radiotherapy and adult populations. The way forward is through standardisation of reporting in order to validate relevant dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela Dell'Oro
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Puthenparampil Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Spiotto MT, McGovern SL, Gunn GB, Grosshans D, McAleer MF, Frank SJ, Paulino AC. Proton Radiotherapy to Reduce Late Complications in Childhood Head and Neck Cancers. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:155-167. [PMID: 34285943 PMCID: PMC8270100 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00069.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In most childhood head and neck cancers, radiotherapy is an essential component of treatment; however, it can be associated with problematic long-term complications. Proton beam therapy is accepted as a preferred radiation modality in pediatric cancers to minimize the late radiation side effects. Given that childhood cancers are a rare and heterogeneous disease, the support for proton therapy comes from risk modeling and a limited number of cohort series. Here, we discuss the role of proton radiotherapy in pediatric head and neck cancers with a focus on reducing radiation toxicities. First, we compare the efficacy and expected toxicities in proton and photon radiotherapy for childhood cancers. Second, we review the benefit of proton radiotherapy in reducing acute and late radiation toxicities, including risks for secondary cancers, craniofacial development, vision, and cognition. Finally, we review the cost effectiveness for proton radiotherapy in pediatric head and neck cancers. This review highlights the benefits of particle radiotherapy for pediatric head and neck cancers to improve the quality of life in cancer survivors, to reduce radiation morbidities, and to maximize efficient health care use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Spiotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mizumoto M, Fuji H, Miyachi M, Soejima T, Yamamoto T, Aibe N, Demizu Y, Iwata H, Hashimoto T, Motegi A, Kawamura A, Terashima K, Fukushima T, Nakao T, Takada A, Sumi M, Oshima J, Moriwaki K, Nozaki M, Ishida Y, Kosaka Y, Ae K, Hosono A, Harada H, Ogo E, Akimoto T, Saito T, Fukushima H, Suzuki R, Takahashi M, Matsuo T, Matsumura A, Masaki H, Hosoi H, Shigematsu N, Sakurai H. Proton beam therapy for children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs): JASTRO and JSPHO Guidelines. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 98:102209. [PMID: 33984606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are often treated with a multidisciplinary approach. This includes use of radiotherapy, which is important for local control, but may also cause adverse events in the long term, including second cancer. The risks for limited growth and development, endocrine dysfunction, reduced fertility and second cancer in children and AYAs are reduced by proton beam therapy (PBT), which has a dose distribution that decreases irradiation of normal organs while still targeting the tumor. To define the outcomes and characteristics of PBT in cancer treatment in pediatric and AYA patients, this document was developed by the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO) and the Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JSPHO).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Mizumoto
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Fuji
- Department of Radiology and National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Miyachi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toshinori Soejima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Yamamoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Norihiro Aibe
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yusuke Demizu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Atsushi Motegi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsufumi Kawamura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keita Terashima
- Children's Cancer Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Fukushima
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tomohei Nakao
- Department of Pediatrics, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akinori Takada
- Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu-shi, Mie, Japan
| | - Minako Sumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kensuke Moriwaki
- Department of Medical Statistics, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Miwako Nozaki
- Department of Radiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yuji Ishida
- Department of Pediatrics, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kosaka
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ae
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ako Hosono
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Harada
- Division of Radiation Therapy, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Etsuyo Ogo
- Department of Radiology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Saito
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroko Fukushima
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ryoko Suzuki
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Matsuo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Akira Matsumura
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Masaki
- Proton Therapy Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
| | - Hajime Hosoi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Shigematsu
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Liu SM, Brooks ED, Rubin ML, Grosshans DR, Frank SJ, McAleer MF, McGovern SL, Paulino AC, Woodhouse KD. Referral Patterns and Treatment Delays in Medulloblastoma: A Large Academic Proton Center Experience. Int J Part Ther 2020; 7:1-10. [PMID: 33604411 PMCID: PMC7886269 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00038.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Patient travel time can cause treatment delays when providers and families decide to seek proton therapy. We examined whether travel distance or referral pattern (domestic versus international) affects time to radiation therapy and subsequent disease outcomes in patients with medulloblastoma at a large academic proton center. Patients and Methods Children with medulloblastoma treated at MD Anderson (MDA) with a protocol of proton beam therapy (PBT) between January 4, 2007, and June 25, 2014, were included in the analysis. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to study the association between time to start of radiation and distance. Classification- and regression-tree analyses were used to explore binary thresholds for continuous covariates (ie, distance). Failure-free survival was defined as the time interval between end of radiation and failure or death. Results 96 patients were included in the analysis: 17 were international (18%); 19 (20%) were from Houston, Texas; 21 were from other cities inside Texas (21%); and 39 (41%) were from other US states. The median time from surgery to start of radiation was not significantly different for international patients (median = 1.45 months) compared with US patients (median = 1.15 months; P = .13). However, time from surgery to start of radiation was significantly longer for patients residing > 1716 km (> 1066 miles) from MDA (median = 1.31 months) than for patients residing ≤ 1716 km (≤ 1066 miles) from MDA (median = 1.05 months; P = .01). This 1- to 2-week delay (median = 7.8 days) did not affect failure-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.34; P = .43). Conclusion We found that short delays in proton access can exist for patients traveling long distances to proton centers. However, in this study, treatment delays did not affect outcomes. This highlights the appropriateness of PBT in the face of travel coordination. Investment by proton centers in a rigorous intake process is justified to offer timely access to curative PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean M Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eric D Brooks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Proton Therapy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - M Laura Rubin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - David R Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Proton Therapy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Proton Therapy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Proton Therapy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Proton Therapy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Proton Therapy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kristina D Woodhouse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Proton Therapy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Modern Radiotherapy for Pediatric Brain Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12061533. [PMID: 32545204 PMCID: PMC7352417 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a leading cause of death in children with tumors of the central nervous system, the most commonly encountered solid malignancies in this population. Radiotherapy (RT) is an integral part of managing brain tumors, with excellent long-term survival overall. The tumor histology will dictate the volume of tissue requiring treatment and the dose. However, radiation in developing children can yield functional deficits and/or cosmetic defects and carries a risk of second tumors. In particular, children receiving RT are at risk for neurocognitive effects, neuroendocrine dysfunction, hearing loss, vascular anomalies and events, and psychosocial dysfunction. The risk of these late effects is directly correlated with the volume of tissue irradiated and dose delivered and is inversely correlated with age. To limit the risk of developing these late effects, improved conformity of radiation to the target volume has come from adopting a volumetric planning process. Radiation beam characteristics have also evolved to achieve this end, as exemplified through development of intensity modulated photons and the use of protons. Understanding dose limits of critical at-risk structures for different RT modalities is evolving. In this review, we discuss the physical basis of the most common RT modalities used to treat pediatric brain tumors (intensity modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy), the RT planning process, survival outcomes for several common pediatric malignant brain tumor histologies, RT-associated toxicities, and steps taken to mitigate the risk of acute and late effects from treatment.
Collapse
|
26
|
Hwang EJ, Gorayski P, Le H, Hanna GG, Kenny L, Penniment M, Buck J, Thwaites D, Ahern V. Particle therapy toxicity outcomes: A systematic review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 64:725-737. [PMID: 32421259 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Revised: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Owing to its physical properties, particle therapy (PT), including proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon ion therapy (CIT), can enhance the therapeutic ratio in radiation therapy. The major factor driving PT implementation is the reduction in exit and integral dose compared to photon plans, which is expected to translate to reduced toxicity and improved quality of life. This study extends the findings from a recent systematic review by the current authors which concentrated on tumour outcomes for PT, to now examine toxicity as a separate focus. Together, these reviews provide a comprehensive collation of the evidence relating to PT outcomes in clinical practice. Three major databases were searched by two independent researchers, and evidence quality was classified according to the National Health and Medical Research Council evidence hierarchy. One hundred and seventy-nine studies were included. Most demonstrated acceptable and favourable toxicity results. Comparative evidence reported reduced morbidities and improvement in quality of life in head and neck, paediatrics, sarcomas, adult central nervous system, gastrointestinal, ocular and prostate cancers compared to photon radiotherapy. This suggestion for reduced morbidity must be counterbalanced by the overall low quality of evidence. A concerted effort in the design of appropriate comparative clinical trials is needed which takes into account integration of PT's pace of technological advancements, including evolving delivery techniques, image guidance availability and sophistication of planning algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Ji Hwang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Medicine, Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter Gorayski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gerard G Hanna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum, Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Liz Kenny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael Penniment
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Buck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Thwaites
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Verity Ahern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hwang EJ, Gorayski P, Le H, Hanna GG, Kenny L, Penniment M, Buck J, Thwaites D, Ahern V. Particle therapy tumour outcomes: An updated systematic review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 64:711-724. [PMID: 32270626 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Particle therapy (PT) offers the potential for reduced normal tissue damage as well as escalation of target dose, thereby enhancing the therapeutic ratio in radiation therapy. Reflecting the building momentum of PT use worldwide, construction has recently commenced for The Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research in Adelaide - the first PT centre in Australia. This systematic review aims to update the clinical evidence base for PT, both proton beam and carbon ion therapy. The purpose is to inform clinical decision-making for referral of patients to PT centres in Australia as they become operational and overseas in the interim. Three major databases were searched by two independent researchers, and evidence quality was classified according to the National Health and Medical Research Council evidence hierarchy. One hundred and thirty-six studies were included, two-thirds related to proton beam therapy alone. PT at the very least provides equivalent tumour outcomes compared to photon controls with the possibility of improved control in the case of carbon ion therapy. There is suggestion of reduced morbidities in a range of tumour sites, supporting the predictions from dosimetric modelling and the wide international acceptance of PT for specific indications based on this. Though promising, this needs to be counterbalanced by the overall low quality of evidence found, with 90% of studies of level IV (case series) evidence. Prospective comparative clinical trials, supplemented by database-derived outcome information, preferably conducted within international and national networks, are strongly recommended as PT is introduced into Australasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Ji Hwang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Medicine, Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter Gorayski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gerard G Hanna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Liz Kenny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael Penniment
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Buck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Thwaites
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Verity Ahern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Greenberger BA, Yock TI. The role of proton therapy in pediatric malignancies: Recent advances and future directions. Semin Oncol 2020; 47:8-22. [PMID: 32139101 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Proton radiotherapy has promised an advantage in safely treating pediatric malignancies with an increased capability to spare normal tissues, reducing the risk of both acute and late toxicity. The past decade has seen the proliferation of more than 30 proton facilities in the United States, with increased capacity to provide access to approximately 3,000 children per year who will require radiotherapy for their disease. We provide a review of the initial efforts to describe outcomes after proton therapy across the common pediatric disease sites. We discuss the main attempts to assess comparative efficacy between proton and photon radiotherapy concerning toxicity. We also discuss recent efforts of multi-institutional registries aimed at accelerating research to better define the optimal treatment paradigm for children requiring radiotherapy for cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Greenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College & Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Goossens ME, Van den Bulcke M, Gevaert T, Meheus L, Verellen D, Cosset JM, Storme G. Is there any benefit to particles over photon radiotherapy? Ecancermedicalscience 2019; 13:982. [PMID: 32010206 PMCID: PMC6974365 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Particle, essentially, proton radiotherapy (RT) could provide some benefits over photon RT, especially in reducing the side effects of RT. We performed a systematic review to identify the performed randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and ongoing RCTs comparing particle RT with photon therapy. So far, there are no results available from phase 3 RCTs comparing particle RT with photon therapy. Furthermore, the results on side effects comparing proton and carbon ion beam RT with photon RT do vary. The introduction of new techniques in photon RT, such as image-guided RT (IGRT), intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) and stereotactic body RT (SBRT) was already effective in reducing side effects. At present, the lack of evidence limits the indications for proton and carbon ion beam RTs and makes the particle RT still experimental.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria E Goossens
- Cancer Centre, Sciensano (Scientific Institute of Public Health), 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marc Van den Bulcke
- Cancer Centre, Sciensano (Scientific Institute of Public Health), 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Thierry Gevaert
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussel, Belgium
| | - Lydie Meheus
- The Anticancer Fund, Reliable Cancer Therapies, Strombeek-Bever, 1853, Belgium
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussel, Belgium.,Iridium Kankernetwerk Antwerp, Belgium.,Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussel, Belgium
| | - Jean-Marc Cosset
- Centre de Radiothérapie Charlebourg, Groupe Amethyst, 65, Avenue Foch, 92250 La Garenne-Colombes, France
| | - Guy Storme
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussel, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wood AM, Lequin MH, Philippens MM, Seravalli E, Plasschaert SL, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Janssens GO. MRI-guided definition of cerebrospinal fluid distribution around cranial and sacral nerves: implications for brain tumors and craniospinal irradiation. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:1740-1744. [PMID: 31526171 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1667023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Background: The SIOPE-Brain Tumor Group recently published a guideline on craniospinal target volume delineation for highly conformal radiotherapy. In order to spare critical structures like e.g., the lens or cochlea, highly conformal techniques can underdose the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the dural reflections around cranial and sacral nerves. The purpose of this study is to generate evidence for CSF extension within the dural sheaths of the cranial and sacral nerves in order to improve accuracy in target volume delineation.Material and methods: Ten healthy volunteers, age 21 till 41 years, underwent an MRI-scan of the skull-base and sacral plexus. To evaluate CSF extension, cT2-weighted images with fat suppression, low signal to noise ratio and little to no motion-related artifacts were used. Two observers measured the extension of CSF from the inner table of the skull for the cranial nerves, and outside the spinal canal for the sacral nerves.Results: CSF extension (mean distance [95% CI]) was visible within the dural sheaths surrounding the majority of the cranial nerves: optic nerve (40 mm [38-42]), trigeminal nerve (16 mm [15-19]), facial-vestibulocochlear nerve (11 mm [11-12]), glossopharyngeal-vagus-accessory nerve (7 mm [7-9]) and hypoglossal nerve (8 mm [7-9]). No CSF was observed outside the spinal canal at sacral level. No significant difference between both observers was measured.Conclusion: This study generates evidence for significant CSF extension outside the inner table of the skull. Despite the vicinity of the lens and cochlea, we therefore recommend the inclusion of both optic nerves and internal auditory canals in the clinical target volume for craniospinal irradiation when using highly conformal delivery techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber M. Wood
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten H. Lequin
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Enrica Seravalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Geert O. Janssens
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Proton beam therapy is a highly conformal form of radiation therapy, which currently represents an important therapeutic component in multidisciplinary management in paediatric oncology. The precise adjustability of protons results in a reduction of radiation-related long-term side-effects and secondary malignancy induction, which is of particular importance for the quality of life. Proton irradiation has been shown to offer significant advantages over conventional photon-based radiotherapy, although the biological effectiveness of both irradiation modalities is comparable. This review evaluates current data from clinical and dosimetric studies on the treatment of tumours of the central nervous system, soft tissue and bone sarcomas of the head and neck region, paraspinal or pelvic region, and retinoblastoma. To date, the clinical results of irradiating childhood tumours with high-precision proton therapy are promising both with regard to tumour cure and the reduction of adverse events. Modern proton therapy techniques such as pencil beam scanning and intensity modulation are increasingly established modern facilities. However, further investigations with larger patient cohorts and longer follow-up periods are required, in order to be able to have clear evidence on clinical benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heike Thomas
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), West German, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), West German, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Radiotherapy Advances in Paediatric Medulloblastoma Treatment. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:171-181. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
33
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The advent of proton beam therapy (PBT) has initiated a paradigm shift in the field of pediatric radiation oncology, with increasing promise to alleviate both short-term and long-term toxicities. Given the dramatic rise in proton therapy centers in the United States, a discussion of the quality of evidence supporting its use in pediatric cancers is warranted. RECENT FINDINGS Proton radiotherapy appears to decrease the incidence and severity of late effects with the strongest evidence in pediatric brain tumor cohorts that shows benefits in neurocognitive, hearing, and endocrine outcomes. However, emerging data has shown that more conservative brainstem dose limits with protons compared with photons are required to limit brainstem toxicity; these modified recommendations have been incorporated into national cooperative group studies. Decreased toxicity in tumors outside of the CNS for PBT have also been reported in sarcomas, Hodgkin disease and neuroblastoma. Similarly, QoL outcomes are improved in brain tumor and other cohorts of patients treated with PBT. SUMMARY The collective findings demonstrate improved understanding and refinement of PBT in pediatric cancers. Data on QOL, toxicity and disease outcomes with PBT should continue to be collected and reported in order to understand the full extent of the risks and benefits associated with PBT.
Collapse
|
34
|
Grau C, Baumann M, Weber DC. Optimizing clinical research and generating prospective high-quality data in particle therapy in Europe: Introducing the European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN). Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:1-3. [PMID: 30049367 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Revised: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cai Grau
- The Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Proton therapy for pediatric malignancies: Fact, figures and costs. A joint consensus statement from the pediatric subcommittee of PTCOG, PROS and EPTN. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:44-55. [PMID: 29937209 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2018] [Revised: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy plays an important role in the management of childhood cancer, with the primary aim of achieving the highest likelihood of cure with the lowest risk of radiation-induced morbidity. Proton therapy (PT) provides an undisputable advantage by reducing the radiation 'bath' dose delivered to non-target structures/volume while optimally covering the tumor with tumoricidal dose. This treatment modality comes, however, with an additional costs compared to conventional radiotherapy that could put substantial financial pressure to the health care systems with societal implications. In this review we assess the data available to the oncology community of PT delivered to children with cancer, discuss on the urgency to develop high-quality data. Additionally, we look at the advantage of combining systemic agents with protons and look at the cost-effectiveness data published so far.
Collapse
|