1
|
Hong CS, Park YI, Cho MS, Son J, Kim C, Han MC, Kim H, Lee H, Kim DW, Choi SH, Kim JS. Dose-toxicity surface histogram-based prediction of radiation dermatitis severity and shape. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:115041. [PMID: 38759672 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4d4e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
Objective.This study aimed to develop a new approach to predict radiation dermatitis (RD) by using the skin dose distribution in the actual area of RD occurrence to determine the predictive dose by grade.Approach.Twenty-three patients with head and neck cancer treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy were prospectively and retrospectively enrolled. A framework was developed to segment the RD occurrence area in skin photography by matching the skin surface image obtained using a 3D camera with the skin dose distribution. RD predictive doses were generated using the dose-toxicity surface histogram (DTH) calculated from the skin dose distribution within the segmented RD regions classified by severity. We then evaluated whether the developed DTH-based framework could visually predict RD grades and their occurrence areas and shapes according to severity.Main results.The developed framework successfully generated the DTH for three different RD severities: faint erythema (grade 1), dry desquamation (grade 2), and moist desquamation (grade 3); 48 DTHs were obtained from 23 patients: 23, 22, and 3 DTHs for grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The RD predictive doses determined using DTHs were 28.9 Gy, 38.1 Gy, and 54.3 Gy for grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The estimated RD occurrence area visualized by the DTH-based RD predictive dose showed acceptable agreement for all grades compared with the actual RD region in the patient. The predicted RD grade was accurate, except in two patients.Significance. The developed DTH-based framework can classify and determine RD predictive doses according to severity and visually predict the occurrence area and shape of different RD severities. The proposed approach can be used to predict the severity and shape of potential RD in patients and thus aid physicians in decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chae-Seon Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ye-In Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Min-Seok Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Gyeonggi do, Republic of Korea
| | - Junyoung Son
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Gyeonggi do, Republic of Korea
| | - Changhwan Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Cheol Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hojin Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Wook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seo Hee Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Sung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yu H, He S, He Y, Dai G, Fu Y, Zeng X, Liu M, Ai P. Dosimetric comparison of advanced radiation techniques for scalp-sparing in low-grade gliomas. Strahlenther Onkol 2024:10.1007/s00066-024-02229-3. [PMID: 38649484 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02229-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alopecia causes significant distress for patients and negatively impacts quality of life for low-grade glioma (LGG) patients. We aimed to compare and evaluate variations in dose distribution for scalp-sparing in LGG patients with proton therapy and photon therapy, namely intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and helical tomotherapy (HT). METHODS This retrospective study utilized a dataset comprising imaging data from 22 patients with LGG who underwent postoperative radiotherapy. Treatment plans were generated for each patient with scalp-optimized (SO) approaches and scalp-non-optimized (SNO) approaches using proton techniques and photons techniques; all plans adhered to the same dose constraint of delivering a total radiation dose of 54.04 Gy to the target volume. All treatment plans were subsequently analyzed. RESULTS All the plans generated in this study met the dose constraints for the target volume and OARs. The SO plans resulted in reduced maximum scalp dose (Dmax), mean scalp dose (Dmean), and volume of the scalp receiving 30 Gy (V30) and 40 Gy (V40) compared with SNO plans in all radiation techniques. Among all radiation techniques, the IMPT plans exhibited superior performance compared to other plans for dose homogeneity as for SO plans. Also, IMPT showed lower values for Dmean and Dmax than all photon radiation techniques. CONCLUSION Our study provides evidence that the SO approach is a feasible technique for reducing scalp radiation dose. However, it is imperative to conduct prospective trials to assess the benefits associated with this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hang Yu
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Shuangshuang He
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China
| | - Yisong He
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, 610072, Chengdu, China
| | - Guyu Dai
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yuchuan Fu
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Xianhu Zeng
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Mengyuan Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China
| | - Ping Ai
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bonaccorsi SG, Tessonnier T, Hoeltgen L, Meixner E, Harrabi S, Hörner-Rieber J, Haberer T, Abdollahi A, Debus J, Mairani A. Exploring Helium Ions' Potential for Post-Mastectomy Left-Sided Breast Cancer Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:410. [PMID: 38254899 PMCID: PMC10814201 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy presents a promising modality for treating left-sided breast cancer due to its unique dose distribution. Helium ions provide increased conformality thanks to a reduced lateral scattering. Consequently, the potential clinical benefit of both techniques was explored. An explorative treatment planning study involving ten patients, previously treated with VMAT (Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy) for 50 Gy in 25 fractions for locally advanced, node-positive breast cancer, was carried out using proton pencil beam therapy with a fixed relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 and helium therapy with a variable RBE described by the mMKM (modified microdosimetric kinetic model). Results indicated that target coverage was improved with particle therapy for both the clinical target volume and especially the internal mammary lymph nodes compared to VMAT. Median dose value analysis revealed that proton and helium plans provided lower dose on the left anterior descending artery (LAD), heart, lungs and right breast than VMAT. Notably, helium therapy exhibited improved ipsilateral lung sparing over protons. Employing NTCP models as available in the literature, helium therapy showed a lower probability of grade ≤ 2 radiation pneumonitis (22% for photons, 5% for protons and 2% for helium ions), while both proton and helium ions reduce the probability of major coronary events with respect to VMAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Line Hoeltgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hoeltgen L, Tessonnier T, Meixner E, Hoegen P, Kim JY, Deng M, Seidensaal K, Held T, Herfarth K, Debus J, Harrabi S. Proton Therapy for Advanced Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5022. [PMID: 37894389 PMCID: PMC10605854 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide the first report on proton radiotherapy (PRT) in the management of advanced nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) and evaluate potential benefits compared to conformal photon therapy (XRT). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 10 consecutive patients undergoing PRT for advanced JNA in a definitive or postoperative setting with a relative biological effectiveness weighted dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions between 2012 and 2022 at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center. Furthermore, dosimetric comparisons and risk estimations for short- and long-term radiation-induced complications between PRT plans and helical XRT plans were conducted. RESULTS PRT was well tolerated, with only low-grade acute toxicities (CTCAE I-II) being reported. The local control rate was 100% after a median follow-up of 27.0 (interquartile range 13.3-58.0) months. PRT resulted in considerable tumor shrinkage, leading to complete remission in five patients and bearing the potential to provide partial or complete symptom relief. Favorable dosimetric outcomes in critical brain substructures by the use of PRT translated into reduced estimated risks for neurocognitive impairment and radiation-induced CNS malignancies compared to XRT. CONCLUSIONS PRT is an effective treatment option for advanced JNA with minimal acute morbidity and the potential for reduced radiation-induced long-term complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Line Hoeltgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ji-Young Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Momeni N, Broomand MA, Roozmand Z, Hamzian N. Estimating the Dose-Response Relationship for Ocular Pain after Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancers and Skull Base Tumors based on the LKB Radiobiological Model. J Biomed Phys Eng 2023; 13:411-420. [PMID: 37868939 PMCID: PMC10589689 DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2210-1554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
Background Radiotherapy is considered a compromise between the amount of killed tumor cells and the damage caused to the healthy tissue. Regarding this, radiobiological modeling is performed to individualize and optimize treatment strategies. Objective This study aimed to determine the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of acute ocular pain following radiotherapy. Material and Methods In this prospective observational study, the clinical data were collected from 45 patients with head and neck cancers and skull-base tumors, and dosimetric data were recorded after contouring the eye globe. Acute ocular pain was prospectively assessed with a three-month follow-up. The Lyman-Kutcher-Berman (LKB) parameters were estimated using the Area Under Curve (AUC) of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) maximization and Maximum Likelihood (MLH) methods, and the NTCP of acute ocular pain was then determined using generalized LKB radiobiological model. The model performance was evaluated with AUC, Brier score, and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests. Results Six out of 45 (13.33%) patients developed acute ocular pain (grade 1 or more). LKB model showed a weak dose-volume effect (n=0.09), tolerance dose for a 50% complication (TD50) of 27.54 Gy, and slope parameter (m) of 0.38. The LKB model showed high prediction performance. The LKB model predicted that NTCP would be less than 25% if the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) was kept below 20 Gy. Conclusion The LKB model showed a high performance in determining the NTCP of ocular pain so that the probability of ocular pain will be less than 25% if the eye globe mean dose is kept below 12 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nastaran Momeni
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Mohammad Ali Broomand
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Zahra Roozmand
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Nima Hamzian
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Momeni N, Ali Boroomand M, Roozmand Z, Namiranian N, Hamzian N. Normal tissue complication probability of acute eyelids erythema following radiotherapy of head and neck cancers and skull-base tumors. Phys Med 2023; 112:102621. [PMID: 37329741 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation therapy is broadly used as one of the main treatment methods for patients with head and neck cancers and skull base tumors. However, it can lead to normal tissue complications. Therefore, this study aimed to model normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of eyelid skin erythema after radiation therapy. METHODS The dataset of 45 patients with head and neck and skull base tumors was prospectively collected from their dose-volume histograms (DVHs). Grade 1 + eyelid skin erythema based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 4.0) was evaluated as the endpoint after a three-month follow-up. The Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) radiobiological model was developed based on generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD). Model parameters were calculated by maximum likelihood estimation. Model performance was evaluated by ROC-AUC, Brier score and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. RESULTS After three months of follow-up, 13.33% of patients experienced eyelids skin erythema grade 1 or more. The parameters of the LKB model were: TD50 = 30 Gy, m = 0.14, and n = 0.10. The model showed good predictive performance with ROC-AUC = 0.80 (CI:0.66-0.94) and a Brier score of 0.20. CONCLUSIONS In this study, NTCP of eyelid skin erythema was modeled based on the LKB radiobiological model with good predictive performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nastaran Momeni
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Mohammad Ali Boroomand
- Clinical oncology department, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Zahra Roozmand
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Nasim Namiranian
- Diabetes research center of Alikhani, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Nima Hamzian
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi Universi of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Seravalli E, Sierts M, Brand E, Maspero M, David S, Philippens MEP, Voormolen EHJ, Verhoeff JJC. Dosimetric feasibility of direct post-operative MR-Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for resection cavities of brain metastases. Radiother Oncol 2023; 179:109456. [PMID: 36592740 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.109456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-operative radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases patients is typically planned on a post-recovery MRI, 2-4 weeks after resection. However, the intracranial metastasis may (re-)grow in this period. Planning SRS directly on the post-operative MRI enables shortening this time interval, anticipating the start of adjuvant systemic therapy, and so decreasing the chance of extracranial progression. The MRI-Linac (MRL) allows the simultaneous execution of the post-operative MRI and SRS treatment. The aim of this work was investigating the dosimetric feasibility of MRL-based post-operative SRS. METHODS MRL treatments based on the direct post-operative MRI were simulated, including thirteen patients with resectable single brain metastases. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was contoured on the direct post-operative scans and compared to the post-recovery MRI GTV. Three plans for each patient were created: a non-coplanar VMAT CT-Linac plan (ncVMAT) and a coplanar IMRT MRL plan (cIMRT) on the direct post-operative MRI, and a ncVMAT plan on the post-recovery MRI as the current clinical standard. RESULTS Between the direct post-operative and post-recovery MRI, 15.5 % of the cavities shrunk by > 2 cc, and 46 % expanded by ≥ 2 cc. Although the direct post-operative cIMRT plans had a higher median gradient index (3.6 vs 2.7) and median V3Gy of the skin (18.4 vs 1.1 cc) compared to ncVMAT plans, they were clinically acceptable. CONCLUSION Direct post-operative MRL-based SRS for resection cavities of brain metastases is dosimetrically acceptable, with the advantages of increased patient comfort and logistics. Clinical benefit of this workflow should be investigated given the dosimetric plausibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrica Seravalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Michelle Sierts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Eric Brand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Matteo Maspero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Szabolcs David
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Joost J C Verhoeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fang K, Lee C, Chuang H, Huang T, Chien C, Tsai W, Fang F. Acute radiation dermatitis among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with proton beam therapy: Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes. Int Wound J 2022; 20:499-507. [PMID: 35880316 PMCID: PMC9885453 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
A high incidence of severe acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) has been reported for cancer patients treated by proton beam therapy (PBT). This observational study investigated the prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of ARD among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with PBT. Fifty-seven patients with newly diagnosed NPC and treated with PBT were enrolled. ARD was recorded weekly based on the criteria of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 at treatment visits (1st to 7th weeks) and 1 week (8th week) and 1 month (11th week) after the completion of PBT. The maximum ARD grade was 1, 2, and 3 in 26 (45.6%), 24 (42.1%), and 7 (12.3%) of the patients, respectively. The peak incidence of grade 2 and 3 ARD was observed during the period of the 6th to 8th weeks. Treatment of ARD included topical corticosteroid alone in 24 (42.1%) patients, topical corticosteroid plus silver sulfadiazine in 33 (57.9%) patients, and non-adhering silicone dressing to cover severe skin wound area in 25 (43.8%) patients. In the 11th week, most grade 2 and 3 ARD had disappeared and 93.0% of the patients had ARD of grade 1 or lower. In the binary logistic regression model, we identified habitual smoking (odds ratio [OR]: 5.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-18.8, P = .012) and N2 to N3 nodal status (OR: 4.9, 95% CI: 1.6-15.4, P = .006) as independent predictors of grade 2 and 3 ARD. The results show ARD is a major concern for patients with NPC treated with PBT, especially those with habitual smoking or advanced nodal status. Topical corticosteroid, silver sulfadiazine, and non-adhering silicone dressing are effective for treating ARD induced by PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ko‐Chun Fang
- Department of EducationKaohsiung Chang‐Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of MedicineKaohsiungTaiwan
| | - Chih‐Hung Lee
- Department of DermatologyKaohsiung Chang‐Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of MedicineKaohsiungTaiwan
| | - Hui‐Ching Chuang
- Department of OtolaryngologyKaohsiung Chang‐Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of MedicineKaohsiungTaiwan,Department of MedicineChang Gung University College of MedicineTaoyuanTaiwan
| | - Tai‐Lin Huang
- Department of Hematology and OncologyKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of MedicineKaohsiungTaiwan
| | - Chih‐Yen Chien
- Department of OtolaryngologyKaohsiung Chang‐Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of MedicineKaohsiungTaiwan,Department of MedicineChang Gung University College of MedicineTaoyuanTaiwan
| | - Wen‐Ling Tsai
- Department of Cosmetics and Fashion StylingCenter for Environmental Toxin and Emerging‐Contaminant Research, Cheng Shiu UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
| | - Fu‐Min Fang
- Department of MedicineChang Gung University College of MedicineTaoyuanTaiwan,Department of Radiation OncologyKaohsiung Chang‐Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of MedicineKaohsiungTaiwan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Raschke F, Witzmann K, Seidlitz A, Wesemann T, Jentsch C, Platzek I, van den Hoff J, Kotzerke J, Beuthien-Baumann B, Baumann M, Linn J, Krause M, Troost E. Time- and dose-dependent volume decreases in subcortical grey matter structures of glioma patients after radio(chemo)therapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 36:99-105. [PMID: 35965663 PMCID: PMC9363945 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy causes atrophy of the hippocampus, amygdala, putamen, thalamus and pallidum. Atrophy is dose dependant and progressive over time. The hippocampus shows the highest atrophy rates at a given mean dose and time. The caudate shows no significant atrophy.
Background and purpose Radiotherapy (RT) is an adjuvant treatment option for glioma patients. Side effects include tissue atrophy, which might be a contributing factor to neurocognitive decline after treatment. The goal of this study was to determine potential atrophy of the hippocampus, amygdala, thalamus, putamen, pallidum and caudate nucleus in glioma patients having undergone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and after RT. Materials and methods Subcortical volumes were measured using T1-weighted MRI from patients before RT (N = 91) and from longitudinal follow-ups acquired in three-monthly intervals (N = 349). The volumes were normalized to the baseline values, while excluding structures touching the clinical target volume (CTV) or abnormal tissue seen on FLAIR imaging. A multivariate linear effects model was used to determine if time after RT and mean RT dose delivered to the corresponding structures were significant predictors of tissue atrophy. Results The hippocampus, amygdala, thalamus, putamen, and pallidum showed significant atrophy after RT as function of both time after RT and mean RT dose delivered to the corresponding structure. Only the caudate showed no dose or time dependant atrophy. Conversely, the hippocampus was the structure with the highest atrophy rate of 5.2 % after one year and assuming a mean dose of 30 Gy. Conclusion The hippocampus showed the highest atrophy rates followed by the thalamus and the amygdala. The subcortical structures here found to decrease in volume indicative of radiosensitivity should be the focus of future studies investigating the relationship between neurocognitive decline and RT.
Collapse
|
10
|
Dosimetric Parameters Related to Acute Radiation Dermatitis of Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated by Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12071095. [PMID: 35887590 PMCID: PMC9318665 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Growing patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) were treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). However, a high probability of severe acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) was observed. The objective of the study is to investigate the dosimetric parameters related to ARD for NPC patients treated with IMPT. Methods: Sixty-two patients with newly diagnosed NPC were analyzed. The ARD was recorded based on the criteria of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Logistic regression model was performed to identify the clinical and dosimetric parameters related to ARD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. Results: The maximum ARD grade was 1, 2, and 3 in 27 (43.5%), 26 (42.0%), and 9 (14.5%) of the patients, respectively. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) in average volume to skin 5 mm with the respective doses were observed in the range 54−62 Cobalt Gray Equivalent (CGE) for grade 2 and 3 versus grade 1 ARD. Smoking habit and N2-N3 status were identified as significant predictors to develop grade 2 and 3 ARD in clinical model, and V58CGE to skin 5 mm as an independent predictor in dosimetric model. After adding the variable of V58CGE to the metric incorporating two parameters of smoking habit and N status, the AUC value of the metric increases from 0.78 (0.66−0.90) to 0.82 (0.72−0.93). The most appropriate cut-off value of V58CGE to skin 5 mm as determined by ROC curve was 5.0 cm3, with a predicted probability of 54% to develop grade 2 and 3 ARD. Conclusion: The dosimetric parameter of V58CGE to skin 5 mm < 5.0 cm3 could be used as a constraint in treatment planning for NPC patients treated by IMPT.
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang CY, Deng Y, Li P, Zheng S, Chen G, Zhou G, Xu J, Chen YP, Wang Z, Jin X, Tang JM, Hu KP, Bi JF, Zhang P, Li CX, Huang A, Lv GJ, Xiao XH, Zou Z, Ji D. Prediction of biochemical nonresolution in patients with chronic drug-induced liver injury: A large multicenter study. Hepatology 2022; 75:1373-1385. [PMID: 34919746 DOI: 10.1002/hep.32283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS To clarify high-risk factors and develop a nomogram model to predict biochemical resolution or biochemical nonresolution (BNR) in patients with chronic DILI. APPROACH AND RESULTS Retrospectively, 3655 of 5326 patients with chronic DILI were enrolled from nine participating hospitals, of whom 2866 underwent liver biopsy. All of these patients were followed up for over 1 year and their clinical characteristics were retrieved from electronic medical records. The endpoint was BNR, defined as alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase >1.5× upper limit of normal or alkaline phosphatase >1.1× ULN, at 12 months from chronic DILI diagnosis. The noninvasive high-risk factors for BNR identified by multivariable logistic regression were used to establish a nomogram, which was validated in an independent external cohort. Finally, 19.3% (707 of 3655) patients presented with BNR. Histologically, with the increase in liver inflammation grades and fibrosis stages, the proportion of BNR significantly increased. The risk of BNR was increased by 21.3-fold in patients with significant inflammation compared to none or mild inflammation (p < 0.001). Biochemically, aspartate aminotransferase and total bilirubin, platelets, prothrombin time, sex, and age were associated with BNR and incorporated to construct a nomogram model (BNR-6) with a concordance index of 0.824 (95% CI, 0.798-0.849), which was highly consistent with liver histology. These results were successfully validated both in the internal cohort and external cohort. CONCLUSIONS Significant liver inflammation is a robust predictor associated with biochemical nonresolution. The established BNR-6 model provides an easy-to-use approach to assess the outcome of chronic DILI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Yan Wang
- Senior Department of HepatologyFifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Ya Deng
- The Second School of Clinical MedicineSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhouChina
| | - Ping Li
- Department of HepatologyTianjin Second People's HospitalTianjinChina
| | - Sujun Zheng
- First Department of Liver DiseaseBeijing YouAn HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Guofeng Chen
- Senior Department of HepatologyFifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Guangde Zhou
- Department of PathologyThird People's Hospital of ShenzhenShenzhenGuangdongChina
| | - Jing Xu
- Department of Liver DiseaseThe Second People's Hospital of Fuyang CityFuyangAnhuiChina
| | - Yan-Ping Chen
- Department of Infectious DiseasesYan'an Second People's HospitalYan'anShanxiChina
- Department of Infectious DiseasesYan'an University Affiliated HospitalYan'anShanxiChina
| | - Zheng Wang
- First Department of Liver DiseaseBeijing YouAn HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Xueyuan Jin
- Quality Control DepartmentFifth Medical Center of ChinesePLA General HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Jin-Mo Tang
- Department of Infectious DiseasesXiamen Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineXiamenFujianChina
| | - Kun-Peng Hu
- Department of General SurgeryThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
| | - Jing-Feng Bi
- Epidemiology Research OfficeFifth Medical Center of ChinesePLA General HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Ping Zhang
- Third Department of Liver DiseasesLiaoyang Infection HospitalLiaoyangLiaoningChina
| | - Chun-Xia Li
- Department of Infectious DiseasesYan'an Second People's HospitalYan'anShanxiChina
| | - Ang Huang
- Senior Department of HepatologyFifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Gui-Ji Lv
- Peking University 302 Clinical Medical SchoolBeijingChina
| | - Xiao-He Xiao
- Senior Department of HepatologyFifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Zhengsheng Zou
- Senior Department of HepatologyFifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General HospitalBeijingChina
- Peking University 302 Clinical Medical SchoolBeijingChina
| | - Dong Ji
- Senior Department of HepatologyFifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General HospitalBeijingChina
- The Second School of Clinical MedicineSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Peking University 302 Clinical Medical SchoolBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Li Y, Sakai M, Tsunoda A, Kubo N, Kitada Y, Kubota Y, Matsumura A, Zhou Y, Ohno T. Normal Tissue Complication Probability Model for Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Carbon Ion Radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:675-684. [PMID: 35278673 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to explore the prognostic factors associated with acute radiation dermatitis (ARD). A normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model for ARD in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) was developed. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 187 patients were included in the analysis, and the endpoint was ≥grade 2 ARD. The biological and physical dose-surface parameters associated with ARD were used in the logistic regression model. The mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the internal cross-validation and Akaike's corrected Information Criterion (AICc) were examined for model evaluation and selection. The multivariate logistic regression NTCP models were established based on factors with weak correlation. RESULTS Tumour volume, planning target volume to the skin, radiation technique and all dose-surface parameters were significantly associated with ARD (P < 0.05). Models with high performance for grade 2-3 ARD were constructed. The most significant prognostic predictors were S40 Gy (relative biological effectiveness, RBE) and S20 Gy [absolute surface area receiving RBE-weighted dose of 40 Gy (RBE) or physical dose of 20 Gy]. The internal cross-validation-based AUCs for models with S40 Gy (RBE) and S20 Gy were 0.78 and 0.77, respectively. The biological and physical dose-surface parameters had similar performance at various dose levels. However, the performance of the multivariate NTCP models based on two factors was not better than that of the univariate models. CONCLUSIONS NTCP models for ARD may provide a basis for the development of individualised treatment strategies and reduce the incidence of severe ARD in patients with HNC receiving CIRT. Furthermore, biological and physical dose-surface parameter-based models are comparable. However, further validation with more evaluation parameters is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Li
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Makoto Sakai
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan.
| | - Anna Tsunoda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Nobuteru Kubo
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Yoko Kitada
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Yoshiki Kubota
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan
| | | | - Yuan Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
in 't Ven L, Compter I, van Eijsden K, Zindler J, Swinnen A, de Ruysscher D, Rozema T, Troost EG, Eekers DB. Pre-treatment visualization of predicted radiation-induced acute alopecia in brain tumour patients. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 33:106-111. [PMID: 35243020 PMCID: PMC8856945 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Alopecia as a side effect of radiotherapy beholds a significant psychological burden for brain tumor patients. Prediction of occurrence and location of alopecia can prepare patients both mentally and practically. We demonstrate a model within our treatment planning system to visualize expected alopecia 4 weeks after radiation treatment for brain tumors. The validation cohort consisted of 147 brain tumor patients and showed a 100% accuracy of expected alopecia in 90% of all cases treated with photon beam radiotherapy.
Background and purpose Temporary alopecia is a common side-effect in brain tumour patients receiving cranial radiotherapy with a significant psychological burden for the affected patient. The purpose of this study was to generate a method in our treatment planning system (TPS) to visualize the expected radiation-induced alopecia 4 weeks after treatment, in order to inform the patients thereupon before the start of radiotherapy. Material and methods A pilot study was conducted in ten patients receiving hypo- (HF) or conventionally fractionated (CF) photon beam Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for an intracranial lesion. Dose calculations were correlated to visible alopecia four weeks after the end of treatment to create a structure predictive of alopecia in our TPS. These alopecia structures for both fractionation schedules were validated in two cohorts of 69 HF and 78 CF patients undergoing radiotherapy between 2016 and 2019. Results In the pilot cohort, a total physical dose of 4 Gy for HF and 12.6 Gy for CF radiotherapy were found to be predictive of alopecia 4 weeks after treatment. Applying these doses to our validation cohort, we found an accurate prediction of alopecia in 59/69 (86%) HF and 73/78 (96%) CF patients. For the total patient group of 147 patients, the predicted amount of alopecia was accurate in 90% of the cases. All inaccurate predictions overestimated the expected extent of alopecia. Conclusion The presented straightforward method to visualize predicted alopecia 4 weeks after treatment has proven to predict the extent alopecia highly accurate in the vast majority of patients. Sharing these results with the patients pre-treatment may result in stress reduction before cranial irradiation.
Collapse
|
14
|
The european particle therapy network (EPTN) consensus on the follow-up of adult patients with brain and skull base tumours treated with photon or proton irradiation. Radiother Oncol 2022; 168:241-249. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
15
|
Normal Tissue Complication Probability Modelling for Toxicity Prediction and Patient Selection in Proton Beam Therapy to the Central Nervous System: A Literature Review. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:e225-e237. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
16
|
Dell'Oro M, Wilson P, Short M, Hua CH, Merchant TE, Bezak E. Normal tissue complication probability modeling to guide individual treatment planning in pediatric cranial proton and photon radiotherapy. Med Phys 2021; 49:742-755. [PMID: 34796509 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton therapy (PT) is broadly accepted as the gold standard of care for pediatric patients with cranial cancer. The superior dose distribution of PT compared to photon radiotherapy reduces normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for organs at risk. As NTCPs for pediatric organs are not well understood, clinics generally base radiation response on adult data. However, there is evidence that radiation response strongly depends on the age and even sex of a patient. Furthermore, questions surround the influence of individual intrinsic radiosensitivity (α/β ratio) on pediatric NTCP. While the clinical pediatric NTCP data is scarce, radiobiological modeling and sensitivity analyses can be used to investigate the NTCP trends and its dependence on individual modeling parameters. The purpose of this study was to perform sensitivity analyses of NTCP models to ascertain the dependence of radiosensitivity, sex, and age of a child and predict cranial side-effects following intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS Previously, six sex-matched pediatric cranial datasets (5, 9, and 13 years old) were planned in Varian Eclipse treatment planning system (13.7). Up to 108 scanning beam IMPT plans and 108 IMRT plans were retrospectively optimized for a range of simulated target volumes and locations. In this work, dose-volume histograms were extracted and imported into BioSuite Software for radiobiological modeling. Relative-Seriality and Lyman-Kutcher-Burman models were used to calculate NTCP values for toxicity endpoints, where TD50, (based on reported adult clinical data) was varied to simulate sex dependence of NTCP. Plausible parameter ranges, based on published literature for adults, were used in modeling. In addition to sensitivity analyses, a 20% difference in TD50 was used to represent the radiosensitivity between the sexes (with females considered more radiosensitive) for ease of data comparison as a function of parameters such as α/β ratio. RESULTS IMPT plans resulted in lower NTCP compared to IMRT across all models (p < 0.0001). For medulloblastoma treatment, the risk of brainstem necrosis (> 10%) and cochlea tinnitus (> 20%) among females could potentially be underestimated considering a lower TD50 value for females. Sensitivity analyses show that the difference in NTCP between sexes was significant (p < 0.0001). Similarly, both brainstem necrosis and cochlea tinnitus NTCP varied significantly (p < 0.0001) across tested α/β as a function of TD50 values (assumption being that TD50 values are 20% lower in females). If the true α/β of these pediatric tissues is higher than expected (α/β ∼ 3), the risk of tinnitus for IMRT can significantly increase (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Due to the scarcity of pediatric NTCP data available, sensitivity analyses were performed using plausible ranges based on published adult data. In the clinical scenario where, if female pediatric patients were 20% more radiosensitive (lower TD50 value), they could be up to twice as likely to experience side-effects of brainstem necrosis and cochlea tinnitus compared to males, highlighting the need for considering the sex in NTCP models. Based on our sensitivity analyses, age and sex of a pediatric patient could significantly affect the resultant NTCP from cranial radiotherapy, especially at higher α/β values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela Dell'Oro
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Puthenparampil Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.,UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Chia-Ho Hua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Thomas E Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.,Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dell'Oro M, Short M, Wilson P, Bezak E. Normal tissue tolerance amongst paediatric brain tumour patients- current evidence in proton radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 164:103415. [PMID: 34242771 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy (PT) is used increasingly for paediatric brain cancer patients. However, as demonstrated here, the knowledge on normal tissue dose constraints, to minimize side-effects, for this cohort is limited. METHODS A search strategy was systematically conducted on MEDLINE® database. 65 papers were evaluated ranging from 2013 to 2021. RESULTS Large variations in normal tissue tolerance and toxicity reporting across PT studies makes estimation of normal tissue dose constraints difficult, with the potential for significant late effects to go unmeasured. Mean dose delivered to the pituitary gland varies from 20 to 30 Gy across literature. Similarly, the hypothalamic dose delivery ranges from 20 to 54.6 Gy for paediatric patients. CONCLUSION There is a significant lack of radiobiological data for paediatric brain cancer patients undergoing proton therapy, often using data from x-ray radiotherapy and adult populations. The way forward is through standardisation of reporting in order to validate relevant dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela Dell'Oro
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Puthenparampil Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dutz A, Lühr A, Troost EGC, Agolli L, Bütof R, Valentini C, Baumann M, Vermeren X, Geismar D, Timmermann B, Krause M, Löck S. Identification of patient benefit from proton beam therapy in brain tumour patients based on dosimetric and NTCP analyses. Radiother Oncol 2021; 160:69-77. [PMID: 33872640 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The limited availability of proton beam therapy (PBT) requires individual treatment selection strategies, such as the model-based approach. In this study, we assessed the dosimetric benefit of PBT compared to photon therapy (XRT), analysed the corresponding changes in normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) on a variety of available models, and illustrated model-based patient selection in an in-silico study for patients with brain tumours. METHODS For 92 patients treated at two PBT centres, volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plans were retrospectively created for comparison with the clinically applied PBT plans. Several dosimetric parameters for the brain excluding tumour and margins, cerebellum, brain stem, frontal and temporal lobes, hippocampi, cochleae, chiasm, optic nerves, lacrimal glands, lenses, pituitary gland, and skin were compared between both modalities using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. NTCP differences (ΔNTCP) were calculated for 11 models predicting brain necrosis, delayed recall, temporal lobe injury, hearing loss, tinnitus, blindness, ocular toxicity, cataract, endocrine dysfunction, alopecia, and erythema. A patient was assumed to be selected for PBT if ΔNTCP exceeded a threshold of 10 percentage points for at least one of the side-effects. RESULTS PBT substantially reduced the dose in almost all investigated OARs, especially in the low and intermediate dose ranges and for contralateral organs. In general, NTCP predictions were significantly lower for PBT compared to XRT, in particular in ipsilateral organs. Considering ΔNTCP of all models, 80 patients (87.0%) would have been selected for PBT in this in-silico study, mainly due to predictions of a model on delayed recall (51 patients). CONCLUSION In this study, substantial dose reductions for PBT were observed, mainly in contralateral organs. However, due to the sigmoidal dose response, NTCP was particularly reduced in ipsilateral organs. This underlines that physical dose-volume parameters alone may not be sufficient to describe the clinical relevance between different treatment techniques and highlights potential benefits of NTCP models. Further NTCP models for different modern treatment techniques are mandatory and existing models have to be externally validated in order to implement the model-based approach in clinical practice for cranial radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Almut Dutz
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Armin Lühr
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Physics and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Linda Agolli
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Chiara Valentini
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Xavier Vermeren
- West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Dirk Geismar
- West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dutz A, Lühr A, Agolli L, Bütof R, Valentini C, Troost EG, Baumann M, Vermeren X, Geismar D, Lamba N, Lebow ES, Bussière M, Daly JE, Bussière MR, Krause M, Timmermann B, Shih HA, Löck S. Modelling of late side-effects following cranial proton beam therapy. Radiother Oncol 2021; 157:15-23. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
20
|
Kern A, Bäumer C, Kröninger K, Wulff J, Timmermann B. Impact of air gap, range shifter, and delivery technique on skin dose in proton therapy. Med Phys 2020; 48:831-840. [PMID: 33368345 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Side effects of radiation therapy may include skin damage. The surface dose is of great interest and contains the buildup effect. In particular, the proton therapy community requires further experimental data to quantify doses in the surface region. This specification includes the skin dose, which is defined according to ICRU Report No. 39 at 70 μm water equivalent depth. The aim of this study is to gather more knowledge of the skin dose by varying key parameters defined by the patient treatment plan. This consists of clinical aspects such as the influence of the air gap, the application of a range shifter (RS), or the proton delivery technique. MATERIAL/METHODS Skin doses were determined with a PTW 23391 extrapolation chamber with three thin Kapton® entrance windows operated as a conventional ionization chamber. The impact on the skin dose for quasi-monoenergetic pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton beams was evaluated for clinical air gaps between 3.5 and 51.1 cm. The differences in skin dose were assessed by irradiating equivalent fields with an RS of 51 mm water equivalent thickness (RS51) and without. Furthermore, the delivery techniques PBS, uniform scanning (US), and double scattering (DS) were compared by defining a spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). TOPAS (V.3.1.2) was used to model an IBA nozzle with PBS and to score dose to water at the surface of a water phantom. RESULTS For the monoenergetic fields without the application of the RS the skin dose was constant down to an air gap of 6.2 cm. A lower air gap of 3.5 cm showed a variation in skin dose by up to 2.4% compared to the results obtained with larger air gaps. With the inserted RS51 an increase in the skin dose was found for air gaps smaller than 11.3 cm. Experimentally, a dose difference of 1.4% was recorded for an air gap of 6.2 cm by inserting an RS and none. With the Monte Carlo calculations the largest dose increase was observed at the air gap of 3.5 cm with 1.7% and 4.0% relative to the skin dose results without the RS and to the largest evaluated air gap of 51.1 cm, respectively. The SOBP comparison of the beam modalities at the measuring plane at the isocenter revealed higher skin doses without RS (including RS) by up to +1.9% (+1.5%) for DS and +1.3% (+1.1%) for US compared to PBS. For all three techniques an approx. 2% rise in skin dose was observed for the largest evaluated air gap of 37.7 cm to an air gap of 6.2 cm when using an RS51. CONCLUSION The study investigated aspects of skin dose of a water equivalent phantom by varying key parameters of a proton treatment plan. Parameters like the RS, the air gap, and the delivery modality have an impact on the order of 4.0% for the skin dose at the depth of 70 μm. The increases in skin dose are the effects of the contribution of the increased electron fluence at small air gaps and the emitted hadronic particles produced by the RS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kern
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, 45147, Germany.,University Hospital Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany.,Faculty of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, 44227, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - C Bäumer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, 45147, Germany.,University Hospital Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, 45147, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,Faculty of Physics, Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - K Kröninger
- Faculty of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, 44227, Germany
| | - J Wulff
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, 45147, Germany.,University Hospital Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - B Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, 45147, Germany.,University Hospital Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, 45147, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,Clinic for Particle Therapy, Essen, 45147, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Behrends C, Haussmann J, Kramer PH, Langendijk JA, Gottschlag H, Geismar D, Budach W, Timmermann B. Model-based comparison of organ at risk protection between VMAT and robustly optimised IMPT plans. Z Med Phys 2020; 31:5-15. [PMID: 33358063 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2020.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The comparison between intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans, based on models of normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP), can support the choice of radiation modality. IMPT irradiation plans for 50 patients with head and neck tumours originally treated with photon therapy have been robustly optimised against density and setup uncertainties. The dose distribution has been calculated with a Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. The comparison of the plans was based on dose-volume parameters in organs at risk (OARs) and NTCP-calculations for xerostomia, sticky saliva, dysphagia and tube feeding using Langendijk's model-based approach. While the dose distribution in the target volumes is similar, the IMPT plans show better protection of OARs. Therefore, it is not the high dose confirmation that constitutes the advantage of protons, but it is the reduction of the mid-to-low dose levels compared to photons. This work investigates to what extent the advantages of proton radiation are beneficial for the patient's post-therapeutic quality of life (QoL). As a result, approximately one third of the patients examined benefit significantly from proton therapy with regard to possible late side effects. Clinical data is needed to confirm the model-based calculations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Behrends
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany.
| | - Jan Haussmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - P-H Kramer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Holger Gottschlag
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Dirk Geismar
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pedersen J, Liang X, Casares-Magaz O, Bryant C, Mendenhall N, Li Z, Muren LP. Multivariate normal tissue complication probability models for rectal and bladder morbidity in prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy. Radiother Oncol 2020; 153:279-288. [PMID: 33096166 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models applied for model-based patient selection to proton therapy (PT) have usually been derived using dose/volume histogram (DVH) parameters from photon-based radiotherapy. This study aimed to derive PT-specific multivariate NTCP models that also accounted for the spatial dose distribution (rectum only) as well as non-dose/volume related factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study included rectum and bladder DVHs, 2D rectal dose maps and relevant patient/treatment characteristics from 1151 prostate cancer cases treated with PT. Prospectively scored Grade 2 late rectal bleeding (CTCAE v3.0, also procedural interventions separately) (n = 156 (15%)) and Grade 3+ GU morbidity (n = 51 (4%)) were entered into a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Model evaluation included assessment of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS Anticoagulant use was a dominant predictor, chosen in four of the six rectum models and in the bladder model. Age was a dominant predictor in all procedural only rectum models while prostate volume, bladder D5% and V75Gy were predictors in the bladder model. The selection frequency of the dose/volume predictors varied widely, where the percentage of the anterior rectum surface receiving >=75 Gy was the most robust. AUC values ranged from 0.58 to 0.70 across all models, with no clear difference between the DVH- and spatial-based models for the rectum. CONCLUSION Anticoagulant use and age were the most prominent predictors in the NTCP models. V75Gy of the rectal wall and the bladder was a predictor in the DVH-based models of the rectum and bladder respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesper Pedersen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital/Aarhus University, Denmark.
| | - Xiaoying Liang
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, USA
| | - Oscar Casares-Magaz
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital/Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Curtis Bryant
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, USA
| | - Nancy Mendenhall
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, USA
| | - Zuofeng Li
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, USA
| | - Ludvig P Muren
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital/Aarhus University, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sawada M, Kunieda E, Akiba T, Kabuki S, Nagao R, Fukuzawa T, Matsumoto Y, Shigematsu N. Dosimetric study of whole-brain irradiation with high-energy photon beams for dose reduction to the scalp. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20200159. [PMID: 32650647 PMCID: PMC7548379 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficiency of high-energy photons for mitigating alopecia due to whole-brain irradiation (WBRT). METHODS Planning CT data from 10 patients who received WBRT were collected. We prepared 4 WBRT plans that used 6 or 15 MV photon beams, with or without use of a field-in-field (FiF) technique, and compared outcomes using a treatment planning system. The primary outcome was dose parameters to the scalp, including the mean dose, maximum dose, and dose received to 50% scalp(D50%). Secondary outcomes were minimum dose to the brain surface. RESULTS Using FiF, the mean doses were 24.4-26.0 and 22.4-24.1 Gy, and the maximum doses were 30.5-32.1 and 28.5-30.8 Gy for 6 and 15 MV photon beams, respectively. Without FiF, the mean doses were 24.6-26.9 and 22.6-24.5 Gy, and the maximum doses were 30.8-34.6 and 28.6-32.4 Gy for 6 and 15 MV photon beams. The 15 MV plan resulted in a lower scalp dose for each dose parameter (p < 0.001). Using FiF, the minimum doses to the brain surface for the 6 and 15 MV plans were 28.9 ± 0.440 and 29.0 ± 0.557 Gy, respectively (p = 0.70). Without FiF, the minimum doses to the brain surface for the 6 and 15 MV plans were 28.9 ± 0.456 and 29.0 ± 0.529, respectively (p = 0.66). CONCLUSION Compared with the 6 MV plan, the 15 MV plan achieved a lower scalp dose without impairing the brain surface dose. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE High-energy photon WBRT may mitigate alopecia of patients who receiving WBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Takeshi Akiba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shigeto Kabuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Ryuta Nagao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Fukuzawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yoshitsugu Matsumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Shigematsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Baumann M, Ebert N, Kurth I, Bacchus C, Overgaard J. What will radiation oncology look like in 2050? A look at a changing professional landscape in Europe and beyond. Mol Oncol 2020; 14:1577-1585. [PMID: 32463984 PMCID: PMC7332208 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The number of newly diagnosed cancers per year is predicted to almost double in the next two decades worldwide, and it remains unclear if and when this alarming trend will level off or even reverse. As such, cancer is very likely to continue to pose a major threat to human health. Radiation oncology is an indispensable pillar of cancer treatment and a well‐developed discipline. Nevertheless, key trends in cancer research and care, including improved primary prevention, early detection, integrated multidisciplinary approaches, personalized strategies at all levels of care, value‐based assessments of healthcare systems, and global health perspectives, will all shape the future of radiation oncology. Broader scientific advances, such as rapid progress in digitization, automation, and in our biological understanding of cancer, as well as the wider societal view of healthcare systems will also influence radiation oncology and how it is practiced. To stimulate a proactive discussion on how to adapt and reshape our discipline, this review provides some predictions on what the role and practice of radiation oncology might look like in 30 years’ time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Baumann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany.,Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nadja Ebert
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Ina Kurth
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carol Bacchus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Palma G, Monti S, Conson M, Xu T, Hahn S, Durante M, Mohan R, Liao Z, Cella L. NTCP Models for Severe Radiation Induced Dermatitis After IMRT or Proton Therapy for Thoracic Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2020; 10:344. [PMID: 32257950 PMCID: PMC7090153 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) of thoracic cancers may cause severe radiation dermatitis (RD), which impacts on the quality of a patient's life. Aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of acute RD and develop normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for severe RD in thoracic cancer patients treated with Intensity-Modulated RT (IMRT) or Passive Scattering Proton Therapy (PSPT). We analyzed 166 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients prospectively treated at a single institution with IMRT (103 patients) or PSPT (63 patients). All patients were treated to a prescribed dose of 60 to 74 Gy in conventional daily fractionation with concurrent chemotherapy. RD was scored according to CTCAE v3 scoring system. For each patient, the epidermis structure (skin) was automatically defined by an in house developed segmentation algorithm. The absolute dose-surface histogram (DSH) of the skin were extracted and normalized using the Body Surface Area (BSA) index as scaling factor. Patient and treatment-related characteristics were analyzed. The Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) NTCP model recast for DSH and the multivariable logistic model were adopted. Models were internally validated by Leave-One-Out method. Model performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, and calibration plot parameters. Fifteen of 166 (9%) patients developed severe dermatitis (grade 3). RT technique did not impact RD incidence. Total gross tumor volume (GTV) size was the only non dosimetric variable significantly correlated with severe RD (p = 0.027). Multivariable logistic modeling resulted in a single variable model including S20Gy, the relative skin surface receiving more than 20 Gy (OR = 31.4). The cut off for S20Gy was 1.1% of the BSA. LKB model parameters were TD50 = 9.5 Gy, m = 0.24, n = 0.62. Both NTCP models showed comparably high prediction and calibration performances. Despite skin toxicity has long been considered a potential limiting factor in the clinical use of PSPT, no significant differences in RD incidence was found between RT modalities. Once externally validated, the availability of NTCP models for prediction of severe RD may advance treatment planning optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Palma
- Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, National Research Council, Naples, Italy.,National Institute for Nuclear Physics, (INFN), Naples, Italy
| | - Serena Monti
- Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, National Research Council, Naples, Italy
| | - Manuel Conson
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University School of Medicine, Naples, Italy
| | - Ting Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stephen Hahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Marco Durante
- GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research, Department of Biophysics, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Zhongxing Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Laura Cella
- Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, National Research Council, Naples, Italy.,National Institute for Nuclear Physics, (INFN), Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Neurocognitive function and quality of life after proton beam therapy for brain tumour patients. Radiother Oncol 2020; 143:108-116. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
27
|
Palma G, Taffelli A, Fellin F, D'Avino V, Scartoni D, Tommasino F, Scifoni E, Durante M, Amichetti M, Schwarz M, Amelio D, Cella L. Modelling the risk of radiation induced alopecia in brain tumor patients treated with scanned proton beams. Radiother Oncol 2019; 144:127-134. [PMID: 31805517 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for radiation-induced alopecia (RIA) in brain tumor patients treated with proton therapy (PT). METHODS AND MATERIALS We analyzed 116 brain tumor adult patients undergoing scanning beam PT (median dose 54 GyRBE; range 36-72) for CTCAE v.4 grade 2 (G2) acute (≤90 days), late (>90 days) and permanent (>12 months) RIA. The relative dose-surface histogram (DSH) of the scalp was extracted and used for Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) modelling. Moreover, DSH metrics (Sx: the surface receiving ≥ X Gy, D2%: near maximum dose, Dmean: mean dose) and non-dosimetric variables were included in a multivariable logistic regression NTCP model. Model performances were evaluated by the cross-validated area under the receiver operator curve (ROC-AUC). RESULTS Acute, late and permanent G2-RIA was observed in 52%, 35% and 19% of the patients, respectively. The LKB models showed a weak dose-surface effect (0.09 ≤ n ≤ 0.19) with relative steepness 0.29 ≤ m ≤ 0.56, and increasing tolerance dose values when moving from acute and late (22 and 24 GyRBE) to permanent RIA (44 GyRBE). Multivariable modelling selected S21Gy for acute and S25Gy, for late G2-RIA as the most predictive DSH factors. Younger age was selected as risk factor for acute G2-RIA while surgery as risk factor for late G2-RIA. D2% was the only variable selected for permanent G2-RIA. Both LKB and logistic models exhibited high predictive performances (ROC-AUCs range 0.86-0.90). CONCLUSION We derived NTCP models to predict G2-RIA after PT, providing a comprehensive modelling framework for acute, late and permanent occurrences that, once externally validated, could be exploited for individualized scalp sparing treatment planning strategies in brain tumor patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Palma
- National Research Council, Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, Napoli, Italy
| | - Alberto Taffelli
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications, Trento, Italy
| | - Francesco Fellin
- Trento Proton Therapy Center, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Vittoria D'Avino
- National Research Council, Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, Napoli, Italy
| | - Daniele Scartoni
- Trento Proton Therapy Center, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Francesco Tommasino
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications, Trento, Italy; University of Trento, Physics Department, Trento, Italy
| | - Emanuele Scifoni
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications, Trento, Italy
| | - Marco Durante
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Darmstadt, Germany; Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Festkörperphysik, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Maurizio Amichetti
- Trento Proton Therapy Center, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Marco Schwarz
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications, Trento, Italy; Trento Proton Therapy Center, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Dante Amelio
- Trento Proton Therapy Center, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Laura Cella
- National Research Council, Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, Napoli, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Palma G, Monti S, Conson M, Pacelli R, Cella L. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for modern radiation therapy. Semin Oncol 2019; 46:210-218. [PMID: 31506196 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2019.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Mathematical models of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) able to robustly predict radiation-induced morbidities (RIM) play an essential role in the identification of a personalized optimal plan, and represent the key to maximizing the benefits of technological advances in radiation therapy (RT). Most modern RT techniques pose, however, new challenges in estimating the risk of RIM. The aim of this report is to schematically review NTCP models in the framework of advanced radiation therapy techniques. Issues relevant to hypofractionated stereotactic body RT and ion beam therapy are critically reviewed. Reirradiation scenarios for new or recurrent malignances and NTCP are also illustrated. A new phenomenological approach to predict RIM is suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Palma
- National Research Council, Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, Napoli, Italy
| | - Serena Monti
- National Research Council, Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, Napoli, Italy
| | - Manuel Conson
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University School of Medicine, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Pacelli
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University School of Medicine, Naples, Italy
| | - Laura Cella
- National Research Council, Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, Napoli, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Raschke F, Wesemann T, Wahl H, Appold S, Krause M, Linn J, Troost EGC. Reduced diffusion in normal appearing white matter of glioma patients following radio(chemo)therapy. Radiother Oncol 2019; 140:110-115. [PMID: 31265941 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Revised: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Standard treatment of high grade gliomas includes gross tumour resection followed by radio(chemo)therapy. Radiotherapy inevitably leads to irradiation of normal brain tissue. The goal of this prospective, longitudinal study was to use MRI to quantify normal appearing white and grey matter changes following radiation treatment as a function of dose and time after radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Pre-radiotherapy (proton or photon therapy) MRI and follow-up MRIs collected in 3 monthly intervals thereafter were analysed for 22 glioma patients and included diffusion tensor imaging, quantitative T1, T2* and proton density mapping. Abnormal tissue was excluded from analysis. MR signal changes were quantified within different dose bin regions for grey and white matter and subsequently for whole brain white matter. RESULTS We found significant reductions in mean diffusivity, radial diffusivity, axial diffusivity and T2* in normal appearing white matter regions receiving a radiation dose as low as 10-20 Gy within the observational period of up to 18 months. The magnitude of these changes increased with the received radiation dose and progressed with time after radiotherapy. Whole brain white matter also showed a significant reduction in radial diffusivity as a function of radiation dose and time after radiotherapy. No significant changes were observed in grey matter. CONCLUSION Diffusion tensor imaging and T2* imaging revealed normal appearing white matter changes following radiation treatment. The changes were dose dependant and progressed over time. Further work is needed to understand the underlying tissue changes and to correlate the observed diffusion changes with late brain malfunctions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Raschke
- Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Rossendorf, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden -Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
| | - T Wesemann
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Medical Faculty of Technische Universität, Dresden, Germany
| | - H Wahl
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Medical Faculty of Technische Universität, Dresden, Germany
| | - S Appold
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - M Krause
- Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Rossendorf, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden -Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Linn
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Medical Faculty of Technische Universität, Dresden, Germany
| | - E G C Troost
- Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Rossendorf, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden -Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|