1
|
Seravalli E, Bosman ME, Han C, Losert C, Pazos M, Engström PE, Engellau J, Fulcheri CPL, Zucchetti C, Saldi S, Ferrer C, Ocanto A, Hiniker SM, Clark CH, Hussein M, Misson-Yates S, Kobyzeva DA, Loginova AA, Hoeben BAW. Technical recommendations for implementation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Helical Tomotherapy Total Body Irradiation. Radiother Oncol 2024; 197:110366. [PMID: 38830537 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
As a component of myeloablative conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), Total Body Irradiation (TBI) is employed in radiotherapy centers all over the world. In recent and coming years, many centers are changing their technical setup from a conventional TBI technique to multi-isocenter conformal arc therapy techniques such as Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) or Helical Tomotherapy (HT). These techniques allow better homogeneity and control of the target prescription dose, and provide more freedom for individualized organ-at-risk sparing. The technical design of multi-isocenter/multi-plan conformal TBI is complex and should be developed carefully. A group of early adopters with conformal TBI experience using different treatment machines and treatment planning systems came together to develop technical recommendations and share experiences, in order to assist departments wishing to implement conformal TBI, and to provide ideas for standardization of practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrica Seravalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mirjam E Bosman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Chunhui Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Christoph Losert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Montserrat Pazos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Per E Engström
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jacob Engellau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Claudio Zucchetti
- Section of Medical Physics, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Simonetta Saldi
- Section of Radiation Oncology, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Carlos Ferrer
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Abrahams Ocanto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, San Francisco de Asís University Hospital, GenesisCare, Madrid, Spain
| | - Susan M Hiniker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Catharine H Clark
- Radiotherapy Physics, National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK; Metrology for Medical Physics Centre, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK; Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Medical Physics and Bioengineering Department, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mohammad Hussein
- Metrology for Medical Physics Centre, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
| | - Sarah Misson-Yates
- Medical Physics Department, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK; UK School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; National Physical Laboratory, Metrology for Medical Physics Centre, London, UK
| | - Daria A Kobyzeva
- Deptartment of Radiation Oncology, Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anna A Loginova
- Deptartment of Radiation Oncology, Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Bianca A W Hoeben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dominietto A, Vagge S, di Grazia C, Bregante S, Raiola AM, Varaldo R, Gualandi F, Gusinu M, Barra S, Agostinelli S, Angelucci E, Hui S. Total marrow irradiation for second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with advanced acute leukemia. Transplant Cell Ther 2023:S2666-6367(23)01246-0. [PMID: 37094701 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a treatment option for patients with acute leukemia relapsing after a first HSCT. While a myeloablative (MA) conditioning regimen before the first HSCT is considered better than reduced intensity (RIC) in terms of disease control in acute leukemia patients, the optimal conditioning regimen for the second allogeneic HSCT remains controversial. The most important prognostic factors are the remission disease phase at the time of the second HSCT and more than 12 months from the first to the second HSCT. Total Marrow Irradiation (TMI) is an advanced high-precision radiation treatment that delivers therapeutic doses over extensively selected targets while substantially reducing radiation to vital organs compared to conventional Total Body Irradiation (TBI). Herein we report the results of a retrospective analysis on second allogeneic transplantation treated with TMI as a myeloablative conditioning regimen, intending to limit toxicity. OBJECTIVE We investigated the efficacy of a high dose per fraction TMI in combination with thiotepa, fludarabine and melphalan in 13 consecutive patients with acute leukemia relapsed after a first allogeneic HSCT treated between March 2018 and November 2021. STUDY DESIGN Donor type was haploidentical (HAPLO, n=10), unrelated (UD n=2), and HLA-identical sibling (SIB, n=1). The conditioning regimen consisted of TMI 8 Gy in 5 patients on day -8 -7 or TMI 12 Gy in 8 patients on day -9 -8 -7, plus Thiotepa 5 mg/Kg on day -6, Fludarabine 50 mg/mq on day -5 -4 -3, Melphalan 140 mg/mq on day -2. TMI was delivered in a hypofractionated daily single dose of 4 Gy for three consecutive fractions. The median age was 45 years (range, 19-70 years); 7 patients were in remission, and 6 had active disease at the time of the second allogeneic HSCT. RESULTS The median time to neutrophil counts of > 0.5×10e9/L was 16 days (range 13-22), and platelet counts of > 20×10e9/L were 20 days (range 14-34), respectively. All patients showed a complete donor chimerism on day 30 after the transplant. The cumulative incidence of grade I II acute GvHD (aGvHD) was 43%, and chronic GvHD (cGVHD) was 30%. The median follow-up was 1121 days (range 200-1540). Day +30 and +100 transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 0. Overall cumulative incidence of TRM, relapse rate, and disease free-survival (DFS) were respectively 27%,7%, and 67%. CONCLUSIONS This retrospective study showed the safety and efficacy of a hypofractionated TMI conditioning regimen in patients with acute leukemia receiving second HSCT with encouraging outcomes regarding engraftment, early toxicity, GvHD, and relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Dominietto
- U.O. Ematologia e Terapie Cellulari, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
| | - S Vagge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - C di Grazia
- U.O. Ematologia e Terapie Cellulari, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - S Bregante
- U.O. Ematologia e Terapie Cellulari, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - A M Raiola
- U.O. Ematologia e Terapie Cellulari, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - R Varaldo
- U.O. Ematologia e Terapie Cellulari, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - F Gualandi
- U.O. Ematologia e Terapie Cellulari, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - M Gusinu
- Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - S Barra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - S Agostinelli
- Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - E Angelucci
- U.O. Ematologia e Terapie Cellulari, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - S Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cailleteau A, Maingon P, Choquet S, Bourdais R, Antoni D, Lioure B, Hulin C, Batard S, Llagostera C, Guimas V, Touzeau C, Moreau P, Mahé MA, Supiot S. Phase 1 Study of the Combination of Escalated Total Marrow Irradiation Using Helical Tomotherapy and Fixed High-Dose Melphalan (140 mg/m²) Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation at First Relapse in Multiple Myeloma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:677-685. [PMID: 36174802 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A second intensification is an option at first relapse in multiple myeloma (MM) after more than 36 months of initial remission. Many conditioning regimens have been tested, with or without total body irradiation (TBI). Recently, it was found that TBI could be replaced by total marrow irradiation (TMI) using helical tomotherapy, with promising results. METHODS AND MATERIALS This study was a prospective multicenter phase 1 trial that aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of TMI administered in association with melphalan 140 mg/m², followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as consolidation at first relapse in MM. Four dose levels were explored: 8 Gy, 10 Gy, 12 Gy, and 14 Gy. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 4 neutropenia >15 days, grade 4 thrombopenia >28 days, and all other grade 4 nonhematologic toxic effects except nausea, vomiting, alopecia, mucositis, and reaction to autologous stem cell infusion. RESULTS Thirteen patients were included; only 1 DLT at the third escalated dose level (12 Gy) was observed, whereas 1 patient was treated at 14 Gy with no adverse events. The MTD was not reached. The rate of acute toxicity was low: 38% of grade 3-4 diarrhea, mucositis, or unexplained fever. Regarding the lungs, the mean dose administered was systematically less than 8 Gy. After a median follow-up of 55 months, 70% of participants were alive. Of these 13 patients, 38.5% were in very good partial response and 30.8% were in complete response. Three of them were progression-free. Six patients were long survivors, still alive after 55 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Total marrow irradiation provides good results with a good tolerance profile at first relapse in MM and makes it possible to increase the dose delivered to the planning target volume while sparing organs at risk. This technique could be discussed for all regimens before auto- or allo-stem cell rescue when TBI is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel Cailleteau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, St-Herblain, France.
| | - Philippe Maingon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | | | - Rémi Bourdais
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | | | - Bruno Lioure
- Department of Hematology, ICANS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Cyrille Hulin
- Department of Hematology, Hôpital Haut Lévêque, University Hospital Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Stéphanie Batard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
| | - Camille Llagostera
- Physics Unit, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, St-Herblain, France
| | - Valentine Guimas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, St-Herblain, France
| | - Cyrille Touzeau
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France; Nantes Université, INSERM, CNRS, Université d'Angers, CRCI2NA, Nantes, France; Site de recherche intégrée sur le cancer (SIRIC), ILIAD INCA-DGOS-Inserm U12558, Nantes, France
| | - Philippe Moreau
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France; Site de recherche intégrée sur le cancer (SIRIC), ILIAD INCA-DGOS-Inserm U12558, Nantes, France; Nantes Université, INSERM, CNRS, Université d'Angers, CRCI2NA, Nantes, France
| | - Marc-André Mahé
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, St-Herblain, France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie Nantes Angers, UMR 1232 Inserm - 6299 CNRS, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oertel M, Eich HT. Strahlentherapeutische Behandlung von Leukämien. BEST PRACTICE ONKOLOGIE 2022. [PMCID: PMC9472722 DOI: 10.1007/s11654-022-00431-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Hintergrund Ziel der Arbeit Material und Methoden Ergebnisse Schlussfolgerung
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Oertel
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie – Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149 Münster, Deutschland
| | - Hans Theodor Eich
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie – Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149 Münster, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zuro DM, Vidal G, Cantrell JN, Chen Y, Han C, Henson C, Ahmad S, Hui S, Ali I. Treatment planning of total marrow irradiation with intensity-modulated spot-scanning proton therapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:955004. [PMID: 35965505 PMCID: PMC9365973 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.955004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The goal of this study is to investigate treatment planning of total marrow irradiation (TMI) using intensity-modulated spot-scanning proton therapy (IMPT). The dosimetric parameters of the intensity-modulated proton plans were evaluated and compared with the corresponding TMI plans generated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using photon beams. Methods Intensity-modulated proton plans for TMI were created using the Monte Carlo dose-calculation algorithm in the Raystation 11A treatment planning system with spot-scanning proton beams from the MEVION S250i Hyperscan system. Treatment plans were generated with four isocenters placed along the longitudinal direction, each with a set of five beams for a total of 20 beams. VMAT-TMI plans were generated with the Eclipse-V15 analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) using a Varian Trilogy machine. Three planning target volumes (PTVs) for the bones, ribs, and spleen were covered by 12 Gy. The dose conformity index, D80, D50, and D10, for PTVs and organs at risk (OARs) for the IMPT plans were quantified and compared with the corresponding VMAT plans. Results The mean dose for most of the OARs was reduced substantially (5% and more) in the IMPT plans for TMI in comparison with VMAT plans except for the esophagus and thyroid, which experienced an increase in dose. This dose reduction is due to the fast dose falloff of the distal Bragg peak in the proton plans. The conformity index was found to be similar (0.78 vs 0.75) for the photon and proton plans. IMPT plans provided superior superficial dose coverage for the skull and ribs in comparison with VMAT because of increased entrance dose deposition by the proton beams. Conclusion Treatment plans for TMI generated with IMPT were superior to VMAT plans mainly due to a large reduction in the OAR dose. Although the current IMPT-TMI technique is not clinically practical due to the long overall treatment time, this study presents an enticing alternative to conventional TMI with photons by providing superior dose coverage of the targets, increased sparing of the OARs, and enhanced radiobiological effects associated with proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren M. Zuro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center (HSC), Oklahoma City, OK, United States
| | - Gabriel Vidal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center (HSC), Oklahoma City, OK, United States
| | - James Nathan Cantrell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center (HSC), Oklahoma City, OK, United States
| | - Yong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center (HSC), Oklahoma City, OK, United States
| | - Chunhui Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Durate, CA, United States
| | - Christina Henson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center (HSC), Oklahoma City, OK, United States
| | - Salahuddin Ahmad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center (HSC), Oklahoma City, OK, United States
| | - Susanta Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Durate, CA, United States
| | - Imad Ali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center (HSC), Oklahoma City, OK, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Hintergrund Lymphoide Zellen weisen eine hohe Strahlensensitivität auf, sodass die Strahlentherapie eine sinnvolle Ergänzung der Systemtherapie bei Leukämien darstellt. Vor allem als konditionierende Behandlung vor allogener Stammzelltransplantation ist die Radiotherapie in Form einer Ganzkörperbestrahlung etabliert. Ziel der Arbeit Die vorliegende Arbeit ermöglicht einen Überblick über Durchführung und Nebenwirkungen der strahlentherapeutischen Behandlung bei Leukämien. Hierbei werden insbesondere die (Langzeit‑)Nebenwirkungen nach Ganzkörperbestrahlung dargestellt. Material und Methoden Es erfolgte eine selektive Literaturrecherche über die Datenbank PubMed zur Radiotherapie von Leukämien und zu Ganzkörperbestrahlungen mit Fokus auf Nebenwirkungen sowie technische und konzeptionelle Neuerungen. Ergebnisse Die Ganzkörperbestrahlung ist eine effektive Therapie zur Konditionierung vor allogener Stammzelltransplantation und weist ein diverses, aber beherrschbares, Toxizitätsspektrum mit endokrinen, kardiopulmonalen, okulären, nephrologischen und neurologischen Langzeitnebenwirkungen sowie Sekundärneoplasien auf. Zusätzlich kann eine Radiotherapie in Niedrigdosis effektiv zur Behandlung myeloider Sarkome (Chlorome) angewendet werden. Schlussfolgerung Die Vielfalt der Nebenwirkungen nach Ganzkörperbestrahlung erfordert eine interdisziplinäre und langfristige Nachsorgebetreuung durch internistische Onkolog*innen/Transplantationsmediziner*innen und Radioonkolog*innen. Technische Entwicklungen der Strahlentherapie können in Zukunft eine selektive Adressierung des Knochenmarks sowie der lymphatischen Organe realisieren. Aktuell sind diese noch nicht in der klinischen Routine etabliert und werden im Rahmen klinischer Studien evaluiert.
Collapse
|
7
|
Hoeben BAW, Pazos M, Seravalli E, Bosman ME, Losert C, Albert MH, Boterberg T, Ospovat I, Mico Milla S, Demiroz Abakay C, Engellau J, Jóhannesson V, Kos G, Supiot S, Llagostera C, Bierings M, Scarzello G, Seiersen K, Smith E, Ocanto A, Ferrer C, Bentzen SM, Kobyzeva DA, Loginova AA, Janssens GO. ESTRO ACROP and SIOPE recommendations for myeloablative Total Body Irradiation in children. Radiother Oncol 2022; 173:119-133. [PMID: 35661674 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Myeloablative Total Body Irradiation (TBI) is an important modality in conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), especially in children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). TBI practices are heterogeneous and institution-specific. Since TBI is associated with multiple late adverse effects, recommendations may help to standardize practices and improve the outcome versus toxicity ratio for children. MATERIAL AND METHODS The European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) Radiotherapy TBI Working Group together with ESTRO experts conducted a literature search and evaluation regarding myeloablative TBI techniques and toxicities in children. Findings were discussed in bimonthly virtual meetings and consensus recommendations were established. RESULTS Myeloablative TBI in HSCT conditioning is mostly performed for high-risk ALL patients or patients with recurring hematologic malignancies. TBI is discouraged in children <3-4 years old because of increased toxicity risk. Publications regarding TBI are mostly retrospective studies with level III-IV evidence. Preferential TBI dose in children is 12-14.4 Gy in 1.6-2 Gy fractions b.i.d. Dose reduction should be considered for the lungs to <8 Gy, for the kidneys to ≤10 Gy, and for the lenses to <12 Gy, for dose rates ≥6 cGy/min. Highly conformal techniques i.e. TomoTherapy and VMAT TBI or Total Marrow (and/or Lymphoid) Irradiation as implemented in several centers, improve dose homogeneity and organ sparing, and should be evaluated in studies. CONCLUSIONS These ESTRO ACROP SIOPE recommendations provide expert consensus for conventional and highly conformal myeloablative TBI in children, as well as a supporting literature overview of TBI techniques and toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca A W Hoeben
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Montserrat Pazos
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Enrica Seravalli
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam E Bosman
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Christoph Losert
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Michael H Albert
- Dept. of Pediatrics, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Tom Boterberg
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Inna Ospovat
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Soraya Mico Milla
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Candan Demiroz Abakay
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Uludag University Faculty of Medicine Hospital, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Jacob Engellau
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Gregor Kos
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St. Herblain, France
| | - Camille Llagostera
- Dept. of Medical Physics, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St. Herblain, France
| | - Marc Bierings
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Scarzello
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Ed Smith
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Abrahams Ocanto
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Ferrer
- Dept. of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Dept. of Epidemiology and Public Health, Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
| | - Daria A Kobyzeva
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anna A Loginova
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Geert O Janssens
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Loginova AA, Tovmasian DA, Lisovskaya AO, Kobyzeva DA, Maschan MA, Chernyaev AP, Egorov OB, Nechesnyuk AV. Optimized Conformal Total Body Irradiation methods with Helical TomoTherapy and Elekta VMAT: Implementation, Imaging, Planning and Dose Delivery for Pediatric Patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:785917. [PMID: 35359412 PMCID: PMC8960917 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.785917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Optimized conformal total body irradiation (OC-TBI) is a highly conformal image guided method for irradiating the whole human body while sparing the selected organs at risk (OARs) (lungs, kidneys, lens). This study investigated the safety and feasibility of pediatric OC-TBI with the helical TomoTherapy (TomoTherapy) and volumetric modulated arc (VMAT) modalities and their implementation in routine clinical practice. This is the first study comparing the TomoTherapy and VMAT modalities in terms of treatment planning, dose delivery accuracy, and toxicity for OC-TBI in a single-center setting. The OC-TBI method with standardized dosimetric criteria was developed and implemented with TomoTherapy. The same OC-TBI approach was applied for VMAT. Standardized treatment steps, namely, positioning and immobilization, contouring, treatment planning strategy, plan evaluation, quality assurance, visualization and treatment delivery procedure were implemented for 157 patients treated with TomoTherapy and 52 patients treated with VMAT. Both modalities showed acceptable quality of the planned target volume dose coverage with simultaneous OARs sparing. The homogeneity of target irradiation was superior for TomoTherapy. Overall assessment of the OC-TBI dose delivery was performed for 30 patients treated with VMAT and 30 patients treated with TomoTherapy. The planned and delivered (sum of doses for all fractions) doses were compared for the two modalities in groups of patients with different heights. The near maximum dose values of the lungs and kidneys showed the most significant variation between the planned and delivered doses for both modalities. Differences in the patient size did not result in statistically significant differences for most of the investigated parameters in either the TomoTherapy or VMAT modality. TomoTherapy-based OC-TBI showed lower variations between planned and delivered doses, was less time-consuming and was easier to implement in routine practice than VMAT. We did not observe significant differences in acute and subacute toxicity between TomoTherapy and VMAT groups. The late toxicity from kidneys and lungs was not found during the 2.3 years follow up period. The study demonstrates that both modalities are feasible, safe and show acceptable toxicity. The standardized approaches allowed us to implement pediatric OC-TBI in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Anzorovna Loginova
- Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
- *Correspondence: Anna Anzorovna Loginova,
| | - Diana Anatolievna Tovmasian
- Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
- Faculty of Physics, Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Daria Alexeevna Kobyzeva
- Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Alexander Petrovich Chernyaev
- Faculty of Physics, Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Oertel M, Martel J, Mikesch JH, Scobioala S, Reicherts C, Kröger K, Lenz G, Stelljes M, Eich HT. The Burden of Survivorship on Hematological Patients-Long-Term Analysis of Toxicities after Total Body Irradiation and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13225640. [PMID: 34830802 PMCID: PMC8616356 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Total body irradiation is an essential large-field technique enabling myeloablation before allogeneic stem cell transplantation. With its field encompassing all organs, a diverse spectrum of toxicities may arise. This work analyzes long-term pulmonary, cardiac, ocular, neurological and renal toxicities in a monocentric patient cohort and identifies possible risk factors. Both the number of patients and the duration of the follow-up period exceed those of many comparable studies in the literature. Abstract Total body irradiation is an effective conditioning modality before autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. With the whole body being the radiation target volume, a diverse spectrum of toxicities has been reported. This fact prompted us to investigate the long-term sequelae of this treatment concept in a large patient cohort. Overall, 322 patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome with a minimum follow-up of one year were included (the median follow-up in this study was 68 months). Pulmonary, cardiac, ocular, neurological and renal toxicities were observed in 23.9%, 14.0%, 23.6%, 23.9% and 20.2% of all patients, respectively. The majority of these side effects were grades 1 and 2 (64.9–89.2% of all toxicities in the respective categories). The use of 12 Gray total body irradiation resulted in a significant increase in ocular toxicities (p = 0.013) and severe mucositis (p < 0.001). Renal toxicities were influenced by the age at transplantation (relative risk: 1.06, p < 0.001) and disease entity. In summary, total body irradiation triggers a multifaceted, but manageable, toxicity profile. Except for ocular toxicities and mucositis, a 12 Gray regimen did not lead to an increase in long-term side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Munster, Germany; (J.M.); (S.S.); (K.K.); (H.T.E.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-251-83-47384; Fax: +49-251-83-47355
| | - Jonas Martel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Munster, Germany; (J.M.); (S.S.); (K.K.); (H.T.E.)
| | - Jan-Henrik Mikesch
- Department of Medicine A—Hematology, Hemostaseology, Oncology, Pulmonology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Munster, Germany; (J.-H.M.); (C.R.); (G.L.); (M.S.)
| | - Sergiu Scobioala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Munster, Germany; (J.M.); (S.S.); (K.K.); (H.T.E.)
| | - Christian Reicherts
- Department of Medicine A—Hematology, Hemostaseology, Oncology, Pulmonology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Munster, Germany; (J.-H.M.); (C.R.); (G.L.); (M.S.)
| | - Kai Kröger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Munster, Germany; (J.M.); (S.S.); (K.K.); (H.T.E.)
| | - Georg Lenz
- Department of Medicine A—Hematology, Hemostaseology, Oncology, Pulmonology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Munster, Germany; (J.-H.M.); (C.R.); (G.L.); (M.S.)
| | - Matthias Stelljes
- Department of Medicine A—Hematology, Hemostaseology, Oncology, Pulmonology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Munster, Germany; (J.-H.M.); (C.R.); (G.L.); (M.S.)
| | - Hans Theodor Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Munster, Germany; (J.M.); (S.S.); (K.K.); (H.T.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pulmonary Toxicity after Total Body Irradiation-An Underrated Complication? Estimation of Risk via Normal Tissue Complication Probability Calculations and Correlation with Clinical Data. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13122946. [PMID: 34204603 PMCID: PMC8231208 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13122946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 06/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Total body irradiation is an integral part of many conditioning regimens prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. It is a large-field technique affecting all organs at risk, of which the lungs are critical for patient survival. However, the precise rates of long-term pulmonary toxicities are unknown. This analysis provides a large patient cohort with long-term follow-up investigating TBI sequelae. Additionally, we present normal tissue complication probability calculations for acute and chronic lung toxicities to enable comparison between biophysical and real-world data. To our knowledge, this is the first adaption of this model to a total-body irradiation patient cohort, which will help to evaluate the feasibility and appropriateness of this approach. Abstract Total body irradiation (TBI) is an essential part of various conditioning regimens prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation, but is accompanied by relevant (long-term) toxicities. In the lungs, a complex mechanism induces initial inflammation (pneumonitis) followed by chronic fibrosis. The hereby presented analysis investigates the occurrence of pulmonary toxicity in a large patient collective and correlates it with data derived from normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) calculations. The clinical data of 335 hemato-oncological patients undergoing TBI were analyzed with a follow-up of 85 months. Overall, 24.8% of all patients displayed lung toxicities, predominantly pneumonia and pulmonary obstructions (13.4% and 6.0%, respectively). NTCP calculations estimated median risks to be 20.3%, 0.6% and 20.4% for overall pneumonitis (both radiological and clinical), symptomatic pneumonitis and lung fibrosis, respectively. These numbers are consistent with real-world data from the literature and further specify radiological and clinical apparent toxicity rates. Overall, the estimated risk for clinical apparent pneumonitis is very low, corresponding to the probability of non-infectious acute respiratory distress syndrome, although the underlying pathophysiology is not identical. Radiological pneumonitis and lung fibrosis are expected to be more common but require a more precise documentation by the transplantation team, radiologists and radiation oncologists.
Collapse
|
11
|
Total marrow and total lymphoid irradiation in bone marrow transplantation for acute leukaemia. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:e477-e487. [PMID: 33002443 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30342-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The use of total body irradiation as part of conditioning regimens for acute leukaemia is progressively declining because of concerns of late toxic effects and the introduction of radiation-free regimens. Total marrow irradiation and total marrow and lymphoid irradiation represent more targeted forms of radiotherapy compared with total body irradiation that have the potential to decrease toxicity and escalate the dose to the bone marrow for high-risk patients. We review the technological basis and the clinical development of total marrow irradiation and total marrow and lymphoid irradiation, highlighting both the possible advantages as well as the current roadblocks for widespread implementation among transplantation units. The exact role of total marrow irradiation or total marrow and lymphoid irradiation in new conditioning regimens seems dependent on its technological implementation, aiming to make the whole procedure less time consuming, more streamlined, and easier to integrate into the clinical workflow. We also foresee a role for computer-assisted planning, as a way to improve planning and delivery and to incorporate total marrow irradiation and total marrow and lymphoid irradiation in multi-centric phase 2-3 trials.
Collapse
|
12
|
Dose-escalated volumetric modulated arc therapy for total marrow irradiation: A feasibility dosimetric study with 4DCT planning and simultaneous integrated boost. Phys Med 2020; 78:123-128. [PMID: 33002733 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the planning feasibility of dose-escalated total marrow irradiation (TMI) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the active bone marrow (ABM) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and to assess the impact of using planning organs at risk (OAR) volumes (PRV) accounting for breathing motion in the optimization. METHODS Five patients underwent whole-body CT and thoraco-abdominal 4DCT. A planning target volume (PTV) including all bones and ABM was contoured on each whole-body CT. PRV of selected OAR (liver, heart, kidneys, lungs, spleen, stomach) were determined with 4DCT. Planning consisted of 9-10 full 6 MV photon VMAT arcs. Four plans were created for each patient with 12 Gy prescribed to the PTV, with or without an additional 4 Gy SIB to the ABM. Planning dose constraints were set on the OAR or on the PRV. Planning objective was a PTV Dmean < 110% of the prescribed dose, a PTV V110% < 50%, and OAR Dmean ≤ 50-60%. RESULTS PTV Dmean < 110% was accomplished for most plans (n = 18/20), while all achieved V110%<50%. SIB plans succeeded to optimally cover the boost volume (median ABM Dmean = 16.3 Gy) and resulted in similar OAR sparing compared to plans without SIB (median OAR Dmean = 40-54% of the ABM prescribed dose). No statistically significant differences between plans optimized with constraints on OAR or PRV were found. CONCLUSIONS Adding a 4 Gy SIB to the ABM for TMI is feasible with VMAT technique, and results in OAR sparing similar to plans without SIB. Setting dose constraints on PRV does not impair PTV dosimetric parameters.
Collapse
|
13
|
Chilukuri S, Sundar S, Thiyagarajan R, Easow J, Sawant M, Krishanan G, Panda PK, Sharma D, Jalali R. Total marrow and lymphoid irradiation with helical tomotherapy: a practical implementation report. Radiat Oncol J 2020; 38:207-216. [PMID: 33012149 PMCID: PMC7533400 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2020.00528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To standardize the technique; evaluate resources requirements and analyze our early experience of total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) as part of the conditioning regimen before allogenic bone marrow transplantation using helical tomotherapy.
Materials and Methods Computed tomography (CT) scanning and treatment were performed in head first supine (HFS) and feet first supine (FFS) orientations with an overlap at mid-thigh. Patients along with the immobilization device were manually rotated by 180° to change the orientation after the delivery of HFS plan. The dose at the junction was contributed by a complementary dose gradient from each of the plans. Plan was to deliver 95% of 12 Gy to 98% of clinical target volume with dose heterogeneity <10% and pre-specified organs-at-risk dose constraints. Megavoltage-CT was used for position verification before each fraction. Patient specific quality assurance and in vivo film dosimetry to verify junction dose were performed in all patients.
Results Treatment was delivered in two daily fractions of 2 Gy each for 3 days with at least 8-hour gap between each fraction. The target coverage goals were met in all the patients. The average person-hours per patient were 16.5, 21.5, and 25.75 for radiation oncologist, radiation therapist, and medical physicist, respectively. Average in-room time per patient was 9.25 hours with an average beam-on time of 3.32 hours for all the 6 fractions.
Conclusion This report comprehensively describes technique and resource requirements for TMLI and would serve as a practical guide for departments keen to start this service. Despite being time and labor intensive, it can be implemented safely and robustly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srinivas Chilukuri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Sham Sundar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India
| | | | - Jose Easow
- Department of Haematology, Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Apollo Specialty Hospital, Chennai, India
| | - Mayur Sawant
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India
| | | | - Pankaj Kumar Panda
- Department of Clinical Research, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Dayananda Sharma
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Rakesh Jalali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shen J, Wang X, Deng D, Gong J, Tan K, Zhao H, Bao Z, Xiao J, Liu A, Zhou Y, Liu H, Xie C. Evaluation and improvement the safety of total marrow irradiation with helical tomotherapy using repeat failure mode and effects analysis. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:238. [PMID: 31882010 PMCID: PMC6935229 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1433-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND & PURPOSE Helical tomotherapy has been applied to total marrow irradiation (HT-TMI). Our objective was to apply failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) two times separated by 1 year to evaluate and improve the safety of HT-TMI. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multidisciplinary team was created. FMEA consists of 4 main steps: (1) Creation of a process map; (2) Identification of all potential failure mode (FM) in the process; (3) Evaluation of the occurrence (O), detectability (D) and severity of impact (S) of each FM according to a scoring criteria (1-10), with the subsequent calculation of the risk priority number (RPN=O*D*S) and (4) Identification of the feasible and effective quality control (QC) methods for the highest risks. A second FMEA was performed for the high-risk FMs based on the same risk analysis team in 1 year later. RESULTS A total of 39 subprocesses and 122 FMs were derived. First time RPN ranged from 3 to 264.3. Twenty-five FMs were defined as being high-risk, with the top 5 FMs (first RPN/ second RPN): (1) treatment couch movement failure (264.3/102.8); (2) section plan dose junction error in delivery (236.7/110.4); (3) setup check by megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) failure (216.8/94.6); (4) patient immobilization error (212.5/90.2) and (5) treatment interruption (204.8/134.2). A total of 20 staff members participated in the study. The second RPN value of the top 5 high-risk FMs were all decreased. CONCLUSION QC interventions were implemented based on the FMEA results. HT-TMI specific treatment couch tests; the arms immobilization methods and strategy of section plan dose junction in delivery were proved to be effective in the improvement of the safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiuling Shen
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xiaoyong Wang
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Di Deng
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Jian Gong
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Kang Tan
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Hongli Zhao
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Zhirong Bao
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Jinping Xiao
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - An Liu
- Divisions of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Yunfeng Zhou
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China. .,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
| | - Conghua Xie
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China. .,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
| |
Collapse
|