Adenomyosis and reproductive performance after surgery for rectovaginal and colorectal endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hypermethylation of Klotho and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Concomitant with Overexpression of DNA Methyltransferase 1 in Adenomyosis

Cellular senescence is known to be involved in tissue repair, but its role in adenomyosis remains unclear. This study was tasked to evaluate the expression of Klotho, a well-known aging-suppressing protein, as well as PPARγ and DNMT1 in adenomyotic lesions (AD) in comparison with that of control endometrium (CT). We performed immunohistochemistry analysis of markers of cellular senescence p16 and p21, along with Klotho, PPARγ and DNMT1 in CT and AD samples, followed by the quantification of gene expression of Klotho, PPARγ and DNMT1 in epithelial organoids derived from AD and CT samples and methylation-specific PCR to evaluate promoter methylation status. The effect of forced expression and knockdown of DNMT1 on Klotho and PPARγ expression in ectopic endometrial epithelial cells was evaluated. We found that both p16 and p21 immunoreactivity in AD was significantly higher while that of Klotho and PPARγ was significantly lower than CT samples, which was concomitant with elevated immunoexpression of DNMT1. The results were confirmed by transcriptional analysis using epithelial organoids derived from AD and CT samples. In addition, the promoter regions of both Klotho and PPARγ genes were hypermethylated in AD as compared with CT, and treatment with HDAC and DNMT inhibitors reactivated the expression of both Klotho and PPARγ. Forced expression of DNMT1 resulted in downregulation of both Klotho and PPARγ but its knockdown increased their expression. Thus, overexpression of DNMT1 seems to facilitate the promoter hypermethylation of both Klotho and PPARγ in AD, resulting in their reduced expression that is suggestive of the role of senescence in adenomyosis.

Adenomyosis Patterns on Transvaginal Sonography Could Predict the Obstetrical Outcomes of Fertility-sparing Surgeries: A Retrospective Cohort Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To explore the associations between adenomyosis patterns on transvaginal sonography (TVS) and surgical outcomes.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.

PATIENTS

The medical records of 322 patients diagnosed with adenomyosis who underwent open or laparoscopic fertility-sparing surgeries from March 1 to December 31, 2018, were reviewed. Patients were divided into localized (221 patients) and diffuse (101 patients) adenomyosis groups on the basis of TVS findings.

INTERVENTIONS

Detailed epidemiological information, imaging evaluations, surgical reports, and pathological findings were retrospectively collected.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The median postsurgical follow-up period was 52.8 months (range 6-88 months), with 24 patients (7.4%) lost to follow-up by July 1, 2019. The localized and diffuse adenomyosis groups had similar symptom relief and recurrent uterine lesions. Among the 104 patients who attempted pregnancy, 75 patients (72.1%) conceived, with 35 miscarriages (46.7%) and 59 live births (78.7%). For the whole cohort and the localized adenomyosis and diffuse adenomyosis groups, the cumulative 5-year conception rates were 75%, 83% and 60%, respectively; the cumulative 5-year live birth rates were 63%, 79% and 37%, respectively. The adenomyosis patterns found during sonography were the only independent risk factors related to clinical pregnancy and live birth in the Cox regression model. Patients with diffuse adenomyosis had significantly lower rates of conception (HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-1.0) and live birth (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8).

CONCLUSION

Adenomyosis patterns (localized versus diffuse) in pretreatment TVS could predict obstetrical outcomes, irrespective of surgical type and uterine size.

CLINICAL REGISTRY

The clinical trial registry name is the Cooperative Adenomyosis Network (CAN); the registration number is NCT03230994 (https://clinicaltrials.gov). This study started on June 30, 2017, and was completed on December 30, 2020.

Bladder Endometriosis: Symptoms and Pregnancy Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical features of bladder endometriosis and factors associated with urinary symptoms, pregnancy outcomes, and long-term effects of symptom relief and recurrence.

DESIGN

A single-center retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A tertiary referral hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-seven patients who were surgically confirmed to have bladder endometriosis at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 2012 and December 2023 were included in this study.

INTERVENTIONS

A retrospective study of the clinical and pathological features and reproductive outcomes in patients with bladder endometriosis.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among 47 patients with bladder endometriosis, 27 (57.4%) presented with urinary symptoms, including urinary frequency, urgency, dysuria, and hematuria. Patients with urinary symptoms were more likely to have previous cesarean sections (odds ratio [OR] 4.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-19.2, p = .032) and experience dysmenorrhea compared to those without (p = .008, OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.5-18.8). Anterior compartment obliteration was another factor associated with urinary symptoms (OR 7.2, 95% CI 1.3-40.4, p = .016). Bladder lesions located within 1 cm of the ureteral orifice (OR 7.2, 95% CI 1.3-40.4, p = .020) and the deeper invasive layer of lesions (mucosal layer, OR 6.1, 95% CI 1.4-25.8, p = .009) were also found to be associated with symptoms. Regarding reproductive outcomes, 12 patients desired to conceive. Of the patients who desired pregnancy, 66.7% achieved pregnancy; 5 spontaneously and 3 after IVF treatment. The miscarriage rate among patients with bladder endometriosis was 25.0% in the age range of 27-40 years. Additionally, all patients experienced symptom relief after one year of follow-up. Only two patients experienced bladder endometriosis recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous cesarean section, dysmenorrhea, anterior compartment obliteration, lesion in the trigone, and mucosal layer invasion were identified as factors associated with urinary symptoms. Although some patients conceived successfully after surgery, disentangling the independent effect of bladder endometriosis on fertility remains challenging.

Endometriosis and risk factors in pregnancy, labor and delivery: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

It is a common thought that endometriosis and its related pain symptoms could improve during pregnancy. However, endometriosis was shown to affect the regular development of pregnancy and delivery outcomes. Several adverse events may occur in the peri-implantation period, and may perpetuate throughout the pregnancy of patients diagnosed with the disease.

METHODS

We analyzed pregnancy, delivery and neonatal outcomes in two groups of patients (case and control group), a total of 91 women with endometriosis were 1:3 matched to 273 controls by age. Diagnosis of endometriosis was histologically confirmed and a database with general medical and gynecological history, pregnancy course, delivery mode and newborn conditions was analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with endometriosis presented higher rates of gestational hypertension (4.4% vs. 0.8%, P=0.02), pre-eclampsia (2.2% vs. 0, P=0.014) and placenta previa (3.3% vs. 0, P=0.003). Caesarean delivery (29.6% vs. 11.3%, P value <0.01) and postpartum hemorrhage (26.5% vs. 11.9%, P=0.04) were more common among patients diagnosed with endometriosis. Multivariate logistic regression showed that cesarean delivery was associated with endometriosis, hypertension and prior cesarean delivery. Postpartum hemorrhage is significantly higher in women treated for endometriosis (26.5% vs. 11.9%, P=0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Endometriosis is related to a higher risk of preeclampsia, placenta previa and postpartum bleeding but it does not increase the risk of cesarean delivery during labor. Obstetricians should consider such associations when managing pregnant patients with a history of endometriosis.

A Systematic Review of Ureteral Reimplantation Techniques in Endometriosis: Laparoscopic Versus Robotic-Assisted Approach

Introduction: Endometriosis, characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus, includes deep endometriosis (DE), which can affect the urinary tract. Ureteral endometriosis (UE) is a rare but significant manifestation that can lead to ureteral obstruction, hydronephrosis, and potential kidney loss. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness and outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted ureteral reimplantation techniques in patients with UE. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, from inception to July 2024. Studies included patients with UE who underwent ureteral reimplantation using laparoscopic or robotic-assisted techniques. Data on patient demographics, surgical technique, duration of surgery, complications, follow-up duration, and clinical outcomes were extracted and analyzed. Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 225 patients in the laparoscopic group and 24 in the robotic-assisted group. Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation, with or without a psoas hitch, was the predominant technique used. The average surgery duration was 271.1 min for the laparoscopic group and 310.4 min for the robotic-assisted group. Recurrence rates for UE were 2.95% for laparoscopic and 5.9% for robotic-assisted procedures. The robotic-assisted group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (6.7 days vs. 9.1 days, p < 0.01). Postoperative complication rates were comparable between the two techniques (p = 0.422). Conclusions: Both laparoscopic and robotic-assisted techniques for ureteral reimplantation in UE are safe and effective, with the choice of technique guided by surgeon expertise and specific clinical scenarios. However, the limited number of robotic cases introduces a bias, despite statistical significance.

Impact of surgery on reproductive outcomes in women with deep endometriosis and proven presurgical infertility: Facts and controversies

In women with proven infertility and deep endometriosis (DE), optimal management is controversial. To date, there is no clear evidence on the association between infertility and different stages of rASRM, nor is there clear guidance from leading scientific societies for surgical treatment of DE patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on the main databases for English-language trials describing the effectiveness of surgery for DE in patients with proven infertility; 16 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in this systematic review (CRD42024498888). Quantitative analysis was not possible because of the heterogeneity of the data. A descriptive summary of the results according to location of pathology, surgical technique used, and whether assisted reproductive technology (ART) was needed or not was provided. A total of 947 infertile women were identified, 486 of whom became pregnant, with an average pregnancy rate of 51.3%. Our review suggests that surgery can be of valuable help in improving reproductive outcomes by improving the results of ART. It has not been possible to reach robust conclusions on the outcomes of surgery based on the location of DE because of the heterogeneity of evidence available to date. Overall, although some data encourage first-line surgical management, further investigation is needed to determine its effective application before or after ART failure.

The Impact of Adenomyosis on Pregnancy

Adenomyosis is characterized by ectopic proliferation of endometrial tissue within the myometrium. Histologically, this condition is marked by the presence of islands of benign endometrial glands surrounded by stromal cells. The myometrium appears thinner, and cross-sectional analysis often reveals signs of recent or chronic hemorrhage. The ectopic endometrial tissue may respond to ovarian hormonal stimulation, exhibiting proliferative or secretory changes during the menstrual cycle, potentially leading to bleeding, uterine swelling, and pain. Adenomyosis can appear as either a diffuse or focal condition. It is crucial to understand that adenomyosis involves the infiltration of the endometrium into the myometrium, rather than its displacement. The surgical management of adenomyosis is contingent upon its anatomical extent. The high incidence of the disease and the myths that develop around it increase the need to study its characteristics and its association with pregnancy and potential obstetric complications. These complications often require quick decisions, appropriate diagnosis, and proper counseling. Therefore, knowing the possible risks associated with adenomyosis is key to decision making. Pregnancy has a positive effect on adenomyosis and its painful symptoms. This improvement is not only due to the inhibition of ovulation, which inhibits the bleeding of adenomyotic tissue, but also to the metabolic, hormonal, immunological, and angiogenic changes associated with pregnancy. Adenomyosis affects pregnancy through disturbances of the endocrine system and the body's immune response at both local and systemic levels. It leads to bleeding from the adenomyotic tissue, molecular and functional abnormalities of the ectopic endometrium, abnormal placentation, and destruction of the adenomyotic tissue due to changes in the hormonal environment that characterizes pregnancy. Some of the obstetric complications that occur in women with adenomyosis in pregnancy include miscarriage, preterm delivery, placenta previa, low birth weight for gestational age, obstetric hemorrhage, and the need for cesarean section. These complications are an understudied field and remain unknown to the majority of obstetricians. These pathological conditions pose challenges to both the typical progression of pregnancy and the smooth conduct of labor in affected women. Further multicenter studies are imperative to validate the most suitable method for concluding labor following surgical intervention for adenomyosis.

Surgical treatment of deep endometriosis: Impact on spontaneous conception

Deep endometriosis (DE) is the most severe form of endometriosis and is commonly associated with infertility. Surgical treatment of DE appears to increase chances of spontaneous conception in appropriately selected patients wishing to conceive. Identifying, however, the exact impact of DE, and its surgical removal, on natural conception is highly challenging. The surgical approach should be favoured in symptomatic patients with pregnancy intention. Limited data from infertile patients suggest that outcomes may not differ from patients without known infertility. Complex DE surgery carries a risk of serious complications, therefore, it should be performed in centers of expertise. Such complications may, however, not have a significant negative impact on fertility outcomes, according to limited available data. Data on obstetric outcomes of spontaneous conceptions after DE surgery are too scarce. In asymptomatic, infertile patients the debate between primary surgery or Artifial Reproductive Technology is ongoing, until randomized studies report their results.

What is the impact of endometriosis and the AFS stage on cumulative pregnancy rates in IVF programs?

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is commonly observed in infertile women and can be staged with regard to severity [e.g. according to the American Fertility Society (AFS) classification]. This condition can cause infertility through impaired oocyte quality, fertilization disorders, tubal lesions, adhesions, deep infiltration, and adenomyosis. Although women with endometriosis often turn to in vitro fertilization (IVF) programs, the literature data on IVF outcomes are sometimes contradictory (i.e. the same as in other etiologies of infertility, or worse). The objective of the present study was to assess and compare pregnancy rates in women with and without endometriosis and according to the endometriosis stage.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates in IVF and the cumulative pregnancy rates after frozen/thawed embryo transfers, in women without endometriosis (group A) or with endometriosis (group B). We further compared groups in which endometriosis was staged according to the revised AFS classification: stage 1/2 (group C), stage 3/4 (group D, without endometrioma), and endometrioma alone (group E).

RESULTS

We documented 430 cycles in group A and 460 in group B (including 56 in group C, 88 in group D and 316 in group E). After fresh or frozen/thawed embryo transfers, the differences in ongoing pregnancy rates between groups A and B were not significant. However the cumulative rates per couple were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in group D.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend IVF for women with endometriosis because the pregnancy rates are similar to those observed for women with other types of infertility. This approach is in line with the international guidelines issued by assisted reproductive technology societies. These results again raise the question of whether surgical resection of deep infiltrating endometriosis (stage 3/4) should be recommended before admission to an IVF program. Trial registration This study was approved by an institutional review board (CPP Ouest VI, Brest, France): reference: B2020CE.43.

Pregnancy after laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis: How long should we wait? A retrospective study involving a long-term follow up at a university endometriosis center

OBJECTIVE

To find the factors that influence the time until pregnancy after laparoscopic intervention and to evaluate the proper time to start assisted reproductive therapy (ART).

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis that includes a prospective evaluation of patients with infertility and with a diagnosis of endometriosis. A subgroup of patients who desired to be pregnant after laparoscopic intervention (102 patients) was followed up for 36-197 months after the surgery.

RESULTS

In this study, 71 (69.9%) and 60 (58.8%) of the patients achieved pregnancy and live birth, respectively. In the group of patients who became pregnant, the duration of infertility was significantly lower (2.7 ± 2.1 years vs. 4.7 ± 3.2 years). The median time until pregnancy after laparoscopic intervention was 8 months (the average was 10 months). After 38 months, no pregnancy occurred.

CONCLUSION

In the group of patients with endometriosis and infertility, the first 12 months were the optimal time for pregnancy. For women with revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis (rASRM) stages I and II, spontaneous pregnancy can probably be delayed for up to 24 months, but in patients with rASRM stages III and IV, ART may be considered after 12 months. The gynecologist must be careful about the timing of further interventions after the operation.

Assessment of Female Pelvic Pathologies: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Pelvic Assessment at the Maternity and Children Hospital, Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia

Background and objectives Pelvic pathologies affect females in all age groups. They vary in size and location and can be wide in classification, such as masses, ectopic pregnancy, ovarian torsion, and ruptured ovarian follicles. Patients commonly present with gynecological complaints such as menstrual irregularities, abnormal pelvic bleeding, and infertility. Extra-gynecological symptoms such as dysuria and painful defecation can also manifest. To diagnose these pathologies, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and other imaging modalities can be useful alongside history and physical examination for early clinical diagnosis. Due to the importance of prevalence rate in predicting pathologies in a certain age and due to the lack of research studies on pelvic MRI studies in Qassim region, Saudi Arabia, this study aimed to demonstrate the wide spectrum of female pelvic pathologies that can be diagnosed using MRI in Qassim region, Saudi Arabia.  Methods and results A cross-sectional study was conducted among patients referred to the MRI Department for evaluation of female pelvic pathologies at the Department of Radiology at Maternity and Children Hospital in Buraydah, Qassim region, Saudi Arabia. A total of 325 patients were included in the study, with the majority being in the age group of 31-40 years. Fibroids were the most common pathology, being present in more than one-fifth of the study sample, followed by neoplastic growths and placental pathologies. Inflammatory pathologies were the least common pathologies, being present in approximately 5% of the participants. Statistically significant associations were found between the age groups, and the presence of anomalies (p = 0.009), existence of neoplastic changes (p < 0.001), presence of placental pathologies (p < 0.001), inflammatory changes (p = 0.025), and adenomyosis (p = 0.028). Conclusion MRI data offer important new information about the prevalence of various disorders among different age groups in the Qassim region of Saudi Arabia. Younger age groups had much higher rates of anomalies, whereas older age groups had much lower rates. Adenomyosis and neoplastic alterations were more prevalent in the later age groups, but endometrioma was more prevalent in younger age groups. Placental pathologies were more prevalent in women in their middle years, while scar pregnancy was more prevalent in women between 31 and 40 years of age. Younger people, especially those between 16 and 20 years of age, were more likely to experience inflammatory alterations. In the younger age group, there was no discernible association between age and the prevalence of normal outcomes. These findings help us understand how different illnesses manifest differently as we get older and emphasize the value of taking aging into account when diagnosing and treating disorders.

Postoperative Pregnancy Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Surgical Management in Women with Stage III/IV Endometriosis: A Single-Center Follow-Up Study

Objectives

The effects of laparoscopic surgical management in women with stage III/IV endometriosis remain controversial. The standard extent of resection for stage III/IV endometriosis with deep endometriosis to treat endometriosis-associated infertility is debatable. This study aimed to assess the postoperative pregnancy outcomes following a routine surgical intervention for stage III/IV endometriosis patients.

Materials and Methods

Patients with stage III/IV endometriosis who underwent conservative laparoscopic surgery at our hospital between January 2010 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the correlations between endometriosis features and postoperative pregnancy outcomes.

Results

Of 256 patients enrolled, 94 wished to conceive. Exclusion criteria: ≥40 years, adenomyosis, partners with infertility issues. Finally, 71 women were included. The overall postoperative pregnancy rate was 76.1% (n = 54): 49 and five from non-assisted reproductive technology (ART) and ART, respectively. The postoperative pregnancy rate in patients diagnosed with infertility presurgery (40/71) was 70.0% (n = 28): 24 (non-ART) and four (ART). The endometriosis fertility index (EFI) score was higher in the pregnant than in the nonpregnant group (P = 0.03). The EFI score and surgical score of EFI were higher in the non-ART than in the ART group (P = 0.04; P = 0.02); in the infertile group, they were higher in the pregnant than in the nonpregnant group (P = 0.018; P = 0.027).

Conclusion

Our postoperative pregnancy rate after conservative laparoscopic surgery for patients with stage III/IV endometriosis compared favorably with previous reports. EFI was a significant predictor of postoperative pregnancy. Our surgical approach to maintain a high surgical score of EFI might help treat endometriosis-associated infertility.

Radiofrequency Ablation for Adenomyosis

Adenomyosis is a common benign gynecologic condition characterized by ectopic endometrial glands and stroma in the myometrium causing pain (dysmenorrhea) and abnormal uterine bleeding. New interventional techniques have been introduced over recent years. This study evaluates the treatment success and side effects of radiofrequency ablation. An electronic literature search in the PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases was carried out on the outcomes of pain reduction and, secondarily, on abnormal uterine bleeding, reintervention, reproductive outcome, imaging outcome, and complications. There was a mean decrease in dysmenorrhea pain scores by -63.4 ± 9.0% at 12 months. Data on other outcome parameters were sparse. No major complications were reported. Radiofrequency ablation represents a promising minimally invasive and organ-preserving treatment in patients with symptomatic adenomyosis. It is associated with clinically meaningful improvement of adenomyosis-related pain in the short term.

Recurrent implantation failure: A comprehensive summary from etiology to treatment

Implantation is the first step in human reproduction. Successful implantation depends on the crosstalk between embryo and endometrium. Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is a clinical phenomenon characterized by a lack of implantation after the transfer of several embryos and disturbs approximately 10% couples undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Despite increasing literature on RIF, there is still no widely accepted definition or standard protocol for the diagnosis and treatment of RIF. Progress in predicting and preventing RIF has been hampered by a lack of widely accepted definitions. Most couples with RIF can become pregnant after clinical intervention. The prognosis for couples with RIF is related to maternal age. RIF can be caused by immunology, thrombophilias, endometrial receptivity, microbiome, anatomical abnormalities, male factors, and embryo aneuploidy. It is important to determine the most possible etiologies, and individualized treatment aimed at the primary cause seems to be an effective method for increasing the implantation rate. Couples with RIF require psychological support and appropriate clinical intervention. Further studies are required to evaluate diagnostic method and he effectiveness of each therapy, and guide clinical treatment.

Deep Endometriosis and Infertility: What Is the Impact of Surgery?

In women with deep endometriosis, the spontaneous fertility rate might range from 2 to 10%. The optimal management of these women is still an area of debate. Therefore, this review aims to explore the literature on the impact of deep endometriosis surgery on reproductive outcomes and pregnancy rates in women with and without prior infertility. A total of 392 articles were identified through database searching. Twenty-three studies were eligible to be included in the review. A total of 1548 women were identified, 814 of whom became pregnant, with a mean pregnancy rate of 52.6% (95% CI 49.7-63%). Our review suggests that surgery may improve fertility outcomes. Due to the variability in the studies, it is impossible to stratify fertility outcomes of surgery by the localization of deep endometriosis. More investigations are needed to determine whether surgical management should be first-intention or limited to the failure of medically assisted reproduction treatment.

Implantation Failure in Endometriosis Patients: Etiopathogenesis

Embryo implantation requires adequate dialogue between a good quality embryo and a receptive endometrium. This implantation is still considered as the black box of reproductive medicine. Endometriosis is a highly prevalent chronic inflammatory disease, concerning about 10% of women of reproductive age and is one of the major causes of female infertility. The mechanisms involved in endometriosis-related infertility, an event not yet completely understood, are multifactorial and include anatomical changes, reduction in ovarian reserve, endocrine abnormalities, genetic profile, immunity markers, inflammatory mediators, or altered endometrial receptivity. In this article, we will focus on the impact of endometriosis on embryo quality and on endometrial receptivity. Results: Poor oocyte and embryo quality seem to promote a lower pregnancy rate, more than the endometrium itself in women with endometriosis. Other studies report the contrary. In addition, hormonal imbalance observed in the endometrium could also alter the embryo implantation. Conclusions: Controversial results in the literature add difficulties to the understanding of the mechanisms that lead to embryo implantation disorders. Furthermore, either oocyte/embryo impairment, altered endometrium, or both may cause impaired implantation. New prospective, randomized, and controlled studies are necessary to determine the origin of the defects that make conception more difficult in the case of endometriosis and adenomyosis.

Endometriosis and Infertility: A Long-Life Approach to Preserve Reproductive Integrity

Laparoscopic surgery was originally considered the gold standard in the treatment of endometriosis-related infertility. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) was indicated as second-line treatment or in the case of male factor. The combined approach of surgery followed by ART proved to offer higher chances of pregnancy in infertile women with endometriosis. However, it was highlighted how pelvic surgery for endometriosis, especially in cases of ovarian endometriomas, could cause iatrogenic damage due to ovarian reserve loss, adhesion formation (scarring), and ischemic damage. Furthermore, in the last few years, the trend to delay the first childbirth, recent technological advances in ultrasound diagnosis, and technological progress in clinical and laboratory aspects of ART have certainly influenced the approach to infertility and endometriosis with, ART assuming a more relevant role. Management of endometriosis should take into account that the disease is chronic and involves the reproductive system. Consequently, treatment and counselling should aim to preserve the chances of pregnancy for the patient, even if it is not associated with infertility. This review will analyse the evolution of the management of infertility associated with endometriosis and propose an algorithm for treatment decision-making based on the most recent acquisitions.

Obstetric Outcome After Surgical Treatment of Endometriosis: A Review of the Literature

A diagnosis of endometriosis is associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes including placenta praevia and preterm birth. Some studies have also suggested associations with gestational hypertension, foetal growth restriction, gestational diabetes, perinatal death, and obstetric haemorrhage. This review aims to assess the impact of pre-pregnancy surgical treatment of endometriosis on future obstetric outcomes. A search of the Medline, Embase and PubMed electronic databases was performed to identify studies reporting pre-pregnancy surgery for endometriosis and subsequent pregnancy outcome compared to controls with unresected endometriosis. Three studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies were heterogenous in design, definition of study groups and outcome measures. All three studies were judged at critical risk of bias. Pre-pregnancy excision of endometriosis was associated with an increased risk of caesarean section in one of two studies, OR 1.72 (95% CI 1.59-1.86) and OR 1.79 (95% CI 0.69-4.64). Placenta praevia rates were also increased in one of two studies OR 2.83 (95% CI 0.56-12.31) and OR 2.04 (95% CI 1.66-2.52). One study found increased risks of preterm birth, small for gestational age, gestational hypertension, and antepartum and postpartum haemorrhage (all p < 0.05) with pre-pregnancy excision of endometriosis. There is insufficient evidence examining the role of pre-pregnancy endometriosis surgery in ameliorating adverse pregnancy outcomes, and thus reliable conclusions cannot be drawn. Prospectively designed studies are needed to assess the relationship between surgical treatments for endometriosis and obstetric outcome and examine potential confounders such as comorbid adenomyosis and infertility.

Treating Deep Endometriosis in Infertile Patients before Assisted Reproductive Technology

Deep endometriosis (DE) causes infertility and pelvic pain. Surgical management of DE has become a topic of increasing interest in gynecological surgery. In women desirous of pregnancy, optimal management such as surgery versus first-line assisted reproductive technology (ART) for patients with severe endometriosis is strongly debated. Current guidelines and literature including retrospective and prospective studies in English available on DE surgery, infertility, and pregnancy outcomes following surgery were searched in Cochrane Library with DE, DIE, Infertility, "DE surgery and pregnancy outcomes," and "Deep infiltrating endometriosis and assisted reproduction" as keywords. The purpose was to find evidence to answer the following clinical questions: How does DE affect fertility and pregnancy? What are the possible benefits of primary surgery for DIE before in vitro fertilization (IVF)? Several studies have recently concluded that surgical removal of DE nodules might actually have a favorable impact on IVF outcomes. This is in contradiction to European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology statement which stated that there was no evidence supporting surgical management of DE prior to ART to improve pregnancy rate; several studies have suggested that the surgical removal of DE nodules might actually have a favorable impact on IVF outcomes. Treatment of DE affecting the rectovaginal septum or bowel requires complex surgery with considerable risk of complications. This review article tries to analyze the rationale of surgical treatment of DE before ART. A balance must be struck between exposing the patient to surgical risk and improvement in pain and fertility potential. Decisions should be tailored according to the individual needs of each woman and most importantly on the ability of the surgeons.

Conservative Management of Rectovaginal Deep Endometriosis: Shaving Should Be Considered as the Primary Surgical Approach in a High Majority of Cases

Deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum remains a challenging situation to manage, and it is even more important when ureters and pelvic nerves are also infiltrated. Removal of deep rectovaginal endometriosis is mandatory in case of symptoms strongly impairing quality of life, alteration of digestive, urinary, sexual and reproductive functions, or in case of growing. Extensive preoperative imaging is required to choose the right technique between laparoscopic shaving, disc excision, or rectal resection. When performed by skilled surgeons and well-trained teams, a very high majority of cases of deep endometriosis nodule (>95%) is feasible by the shaving technique, and this is associated with lower complication rates regarding rectal resection. In most cases, removing a part of the rectum is questionable according to the risk of complications, and the rectum should be preserved as far as possible. Shaving and rectal resection are comparable in terms of recurrence rates. As shaving is manageable whatever the size of the lesions, surgeons should consider rectal shaving as first-line surgery to remove rectal deep endometriosis. Rectal stenosis of more than 80% of the lumen, multiple bowel deep endometriosis nodules, and stenotic sigmoid colon lesions should be considered as indication for rectal resection, but this represents a minority of cases.

Hysterolaparoscopy: A Gold Standard for Diagnosing and Treating Infertility and Benign Uterine Pathology

BACKGROUND

Combined hysteroscopy and laparoscopy is a valuable method for diagnosing and treating infertility and benign uterine pathology. Both procedures are minimally invasive, reliable, and safe, with a low complication rate.

AIM

In this review, we expose the efficiency and safety of hysterolaparoscopy in the management of infertility and other benign uterine pathologies.

METHOD

We performed a systematic literature review on several databases: PubMed®/MEDLINE, PMC, Crossref.org, and Web of Science in the last 10 years.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Women of reproductive age with primary or secondary infertility and/or benign uterine pathology.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

pre-puberty, menopause, couple with male infertility.

CONCLUSION

Hysterolaparoscopy is a useful tool to assess infertility and simultaneously diagnose and treat pelvic and uterine lesions.

Adenomyosis: Impact on Fertility and Obstetric Outcomes

In this commentary, we discuss the associations between adenomyosis, fertility, and obstetric outcomes. A recent meta-analysis on the impact of adenomyosis on reproductive outcomes found a 43% reduction in the odds ratio (OR) for clinical pregnancy and a threefold increase in the risk of miscarriage in women with adenomyosis compared with controls. Moreover, adenomyosis seems to be strongly associated with pre-eclampsia with an OR of almost 8. Also, the risk for small for gestational age was almost fourfold increased, whereas for preterm deliveries was threefold increased. The presence of deep infiltrating endometriosis and adenomyosis seems associated with particularly adverse obstetric outcomes, especially concerning natural conception. Some observations suggest that the probability of clinical pregnancy is considerably low in these cases, around 11.8%. Although several methodological drawbacks prevent definitive conclusions, all these elements should be considered in counseling women with adenomyosis seeking pregnancy, especially in cases of IVF.

Pregnancy outcomes in women with infertility and coexisting endometriosis and adenomyosis after laparoscopic surgery: a long-term retrospective follow-up study

Background

Adenomyosis (AM) and endometriosis (EM) often coexist. Laparoscopic surgery is one of the main methods for diagnosing and treating these conditions. This study aims to investigate the pregnancy outcomes of women with infertility with both AM and EM after laparoscopic surgery and to identify the relevant associated factors.

Methods

This is a retrospective study involving women with infertility diagnosed with EM and AM. All patients had undergone laparoscopic surgery and were divided into two groups according to their pregnancy outcomes. Demographic data, operation records, and pregnancy outcomes were collected.

Results

A total of 226 female patients with infertility diagnosed with both AM and EM underwent laparoscopic surgery. Of these, a total of 176 patients completed follow-up. Ninety-seven patients had live births, including 81 full-term and 16 preterm deliveries. The clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were 67.4 and 55.11%, respectively. One hundred thirty-five patients received in vitro fertilization (IVF), with 70 (51.85%) of these patients having live births. Age, endometrioma size, and uterus size were significantly lower in those who had a successful delivery. There was no statistically significant difference in symptoms, except that those who achieved live birth had a lower rate of anaemia (13.40% vs. 25.32%, p = 0.044). The group that did not proceed to have a live birth had a higher percentage of ovarian and peritoneal endometriosis (p < 0.05), while the distribution of deep infiltrating endometriosis and adenomyosis types were similar. Mean uterus diameter (OR: 0.636, 95% CI: 0.434–0.932, p = 0.020) and endometriosis fertility index (EFI) (OR: 1.299, 95% CI: 1.101–1.531, p = 0.002) were significantly correlated with live birth in the multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

Endometriosis and adenomyosis appear to have an adverse effect on pregnancy outcome. These might be related to the size of the uterus and EFI. Obstetricians and gynaecologists should be alert to this potential adverse effect and manage these patients accordingly.

A Detailed Study in Adenomyosis and Endometriosis: Evaluation of the Rate of Coexistence Between Uterine Adenomyosis and DIE According to Imaging and Histopathology Findings

The current study was designed to evaluate the relationship between adenomyosis and its subtypes with endometriotic lesions (ovarian endometrioma (OMAs) and posterior deep infiltrative endometriosis (DIE)), to examine the probability of existence of a common cause of these mysterious diseases, and to evaluate the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of both transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) and MRI in diagnosis of adenomyotic uterus. In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we selected 154 women with coexistence of endometriosis and adenomyosis according to their imaging, intraoperative, or pathological findings who were nominated for laparoscopic surgery. Eighty-six patients with just DIE resection without LH (laparoscopic hysterectomy) (group 1), and 68 patients with LH + DIE resection (group 2). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasonographic and MRI findings for diagnosing adenomyosis were 72.1%, 77.6%, 40.0% and 49.2%, 41.5%, 90.0% respectively. So, TVS is a more sensitive diagnostic tool for diagnosing adenomyosis. However, MRI was more specific than TVS in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis especially with simultaneous presence of uterine leiomyoma. Regarding the association of different types of adenomyosis (focal and diffuse) with different endometriosis lesions (OMA and posterior compartment DIE), we just found diffuse type of adenomyosis more frequent in the absence of rectal and rectovaginal septum (RVS) DIE (p ≤ 0.05). In addition to the questionable different nature of rectal and RVS DIE lesion, there is no relationship between adenomyosis subtypes and endometriotic lesions.

Bedeutung der Fertilitätschirurgie bei Kinderwunsch

Die Bedeutung der Fertilitätschirurgie bei Kinderwunsch kann vielfach aufgrund fehlender eigener Erfahrung während der Facharztweiterbildung nicht erfasst werden, da nur an wenigen Zentren eine spezifische operative Ausbildung erfolgt. Neben der Abklärung anatomischer Fehlbildungen mittels Hysteroskopie bzw. Laparoskopie gehört die operative Myom- und Endometriosebehandlung zu den Standardverfahren der Fertilitätschirurgie. Hier ist die Erfahrung der Reproduktionsmediziner gefragt, damit unter maximaler Schonung der Ovarreserve ein bestmöglichstes Ergebnis hinsichtlich Endometriosesanierung bzw. Myomenukleation erreicht wird. Die Abklärung der Tubendurchgängigkeit mit Chromopertubation ist nach wie vor Goldstandard, auch wenn im ambulanten Sektor vorwiegend nichtoperative Verfahren zum Einsatz kommen. Die diagnostische und gegebenenfalls operative Hysteroskopie dient der Beurteilung des Endometriums und erlaubt den Ausschluss von Entzündungsprozessen oder dem Vorliegen von Polypen.

Proteomic Analysis of Uterine Tissues During Peri-Implantation Period in Mice with Experimentally Induced Adenomyosis that Treated with anti-Ngf: Implications for Cell-Cell Adhesion and Metabolic Processes

Nerve growth factor (NGF) has been verified to be expressed with higher level in adenomyosis uteri, and its neutralizing antibody has a strong inhibitory influence on inflammation. The present study aimed to explore the effect of anti-NGF on the expression of proteins in uteri of mice-induced adenomyosis and assessed its potential role in improving pregnancy rate. In this study, we established a mouse model of adenomyosis and administrated NGF-neutralizing antibody into mice. The mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of the uteri during the implantation window was performed to explore the essential proteins participating in therapy. Besides, embryos of healthy mice were transferred into the uteri to assess the implantation rate. The results of MS analysis demonstrated that 119 proteins were changed in the adenomyosis group compared with control group, and 126 proteins were differentially expressed in the anti-NGF group compared with the adenomyosis group (fold change > 1.5, P < 0.05. After performing cluster analysis using Mfuzz package, we found that a group of proteins participated in cell-cell adhesion and metabolic processes, which were attenuated in the adenomyosis group, while those were successfully recovered by anti-NGF treatment. Western blotting confirmed that the expression levels of integrin alpha-1 (ITGA1), integrin beta-1 (ITGB1), laminin subunit gamma-1 (LAMC1), and creatine kinase M-type (CKM) were decreased in adenomyosis group, whereas those levels were elevated after anti-NGF treatment. Embryo implantation rate in the adenomyosis group was significantly decreased compared with that in the control group (2.31% vs. 26.15%, P < 0.001) and anti-NGF treatment slightly enhanced the embryo implantation rate in mice with experimentally induced adenomyosis (9.23% vs. 2.31%, P = 0.017). Our results revealed that anti-NGF therapy can improve fertility of mice with experimentally induced adenomyosis, possibly through promoting integrin-related proteins.

Fertility, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of patients with adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to investigate the association of adenomyosis with fertility, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. An electronic search was conducted using the MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane databases up to April 2020. Seventeen observational studies were included. Adenomyosis was significantly associated with a lower clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.94) and higher miscarriage rate (OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.25-3.79) after treatment with assisted reproductive technology (ART). The lower clinical pregnancy rate was more significant in the subgroup of patients with short down-regulation protocols. Similar associations were recorded after age adjustment. Adenomyosis was also significantly associated with an increased risk of pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery, Caesarean section, fetal malpresentation, small for gestational age infancy and post-partum haemorrhage, which was confirmed after correction for age and mode of conception. In conclusion, adenomyosis is associated with negative effects on fertility after ART. The potentially protective role of the ultra-long down-regulation protocols needs further evaluation in randomized controlled studies. Adenomyosis is also associated (independently of the mode of conception) with adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Proper counselling prior to ART and close monitoring of pregnancy in patients with adenomyosis should be recommended.

Deep endometriosis: The place of laparoscopic shaving

Deep endometriosis (DE) is considered to be one of the most challenging conditions to manage, especially when it invades surrounding organs like the rectum. Surgical excision of deep rectovaginal endometriosis is required when lesions are symptomatic, impairing bowel, urinary, sexual, and reproductive functions, or if they evolve. Preoperative radiological examination should be extensive to determine the appropriate surgery: laparoscopic shaving, disc excision, or rectal resection. We demonstrated that in the hands of experienced surgeons, rectal shaving is possible for DE in more than 95% of cases, with low complication rates compared to rectal resection. Shaving and bowel resection are associated with comparable recurrence rates. As shaving is indicated whatever the size of deep lesions, surgeons should first consider rectal shaving to remove DE. Bowel resection should only be performed in case of major rectal stenosis (>80%), multiple and/or posterior rectal lesions and stenotic sigmoid colon lesions.

Role of angiogenesis in adenomyosis-associated abnormal uterine bleeding and subfertility: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Adenomyosis commonly occurs with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and is associated with subfertility and a higher miscarriage rate. Recent evidence showed abnormal vascularization in the endometrium in patients with adenomyosis, suggesting a role of angiogenesis in the pathophysiology of AUB and subfertility in adenomyosis and providing a possible treatment target.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

We hypothesized that the level of abnormal vascularization and expression of angiogenic markers is increased in the ectopic and eutopic endometrium of adenomyosis patients in comparison with the endometrium of control patients. This was investigated through a search of the literature.

SEARCH METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed and Embase until February 2019. Combinations of terms for angiogenesis and adenomyosis were applied as well as AUB, subfertility or anti-angiogenic therapy. The main search was limited to clinical studies carried out on premenopausal women. Original research articles focusing on markers of angiogenesis in the endometrium of patients with adenomyosis were included. Studies in which no comparison was made to control patients or which were not published in a peer-reviewed journal were excluded. A second search was performed to explore the therapeutic potential of targeting angiogenesis in adenomyosis. This search also included preclinical studies.

OUTCOMES

A total of 20 articles out of 1669 hits met our selection criteria. The mean vascular density (MVD) was studied by quantification of CD31, CD34, von Willebrand Factor (vWF) or factor-VIII-antibody-stained microvessels in seven studies. All these studies reported a significantly increased MVD in ectopic endometrium, and out of the six articles that took it into account, four studies reported a significantly increased MVD in eutopic endometrium compared with control endometrium. Five articles showed a significantly higher vascular endothelial growth factor expression in ectopic endometrium and three articles in eutopic endometrium compared with control endometrium. The vascular and pro-angiogenic markers α-smooth muscle actin, endoglin, S100A13, vimentin, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), nuclear factor (NF)-kB, tissue factor (TF), DJ-1, phosphorylated mammalian target of rapamycin, activin A, folli- and myostatin, CD41, SLIT, roundabout 1 (ROBO1), cyclooxygenase-2, lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) 1,4-5, phospho signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (pSTAT3), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-22 and transforming growth factor-β1 were increased in ectopic endometrium, and the markers S100A13, MMP-2 and -9, TF, follistatin, myostatin, ROBO1, LPA1 and 4-5, pSTAT3, IL-6 and IL-22 were increased in eutopic endometrium, compared with control endometrium. The anti-angiogenic markers E-cadherin, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit and gene associated with retinoic-interferon-induced mortality 19 were decreased in ectopic endometrium and IL-10 in eutopic endometrium, compared with control endometrium. The staining level of vWF and two pro-angiogenic markers (NF-κB nuclear p65 and TF) correlated with AUB in patients with adenomyosis. We found no studies that investigated the possible relationship between markers of angiogenesis and subfertility in adenomyosis patients. Nine articles reported on direct or indirect targeting of angiogenesis in adenomyosis-either by testing hormonal therapy or herbal compounds in clinical studies or by testing angiogenesis inhibitors in preclinical studies. However, there are no clinical studies on the effectiveness of such therapy for adenomyosis-related AUB or subfertility.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

The results are in agreement with our hypothesis that increased angiogenesis is present in the endometrium of patients with adenomyosis compared with the endometrium of control patients. It is likely that increased angiogenesis leads to fragile and more permeable vessels resulting in adenomyosis-related AUB and possibly subfertility. While this association has not sufficiently been studied yet, our results encourage future studies to investigate the exact role of angiogenesis in the etiology of adenomyosis and related AUB or subfertility in women with adenomyosis in order to design curative or preventive therapeutic strategies.

Reproductive, obstetric, and perinatal outcomes of women with adenomyosis and endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The reproductive impact of adenomyosis and endometriosis is widely researched but the extent of these impacts remains elusive. It has been demonstrated that endometriosis, in particular, is known to result in subfertility but endometriosis and adenomyosis are increasingly linked to late pregnancy complications such as those caused by placental insufficiency. At the molecular level, the presence of ectopic endometrium perturbs the endometrial hormonal, cellular, and immunological milieu, negatively influencing decidualization, placentation, and developmental programming of the embryo. It is unclear if and how such early aberrant reproductive development relates to pregnancy outcomes in endometriosis and adenomyosis.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to (i) investigate the association of adenomyosis and endometriosis with fertility, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes of women through both assisted reproduction and natural conception and (ii) determine whether endometriosis disease subtypes have specific impacts on different stages of the reproductive process.

SEARCH METHODS

A systematic literature review of NHS evidence electronic databases and the Cochrane database identified all comparative and observational studies between 1980 and December 2018 in any language on adenomyosis and endometriosis with fertility, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes (23 search terms used). A total of 104 papers were selected for data extraction and meta-analysis, with use of Downs and Black standardized checklist to evaluate quality and bias.

OUTCOMES

We found that endometriosis consistently leads to reduced oocyte yield and a reduced fertilization rate (FR), in line with current evidence. Milder forms of endometriosis were most likely to affect the fertilization (FR OR 0.77, CI 0.63-0.93) and earlier implantation processes (implantation rate OR 0.76, CI 0.62-0.93). The more severe disease by American Society for Reproductive Medicine staging (ASRM III and IV) influenced all stages of reproduction. Ovarian endometriosis negatively affects the oocyte yield (MD -1.22, CI -1.96, -0.49) and number of mature oocytes (MD -2.24, CI -3.4, -1.09). We found an increased risk of miscarriage in both adenomyosis and endometriosis (OR 3.40, CI 1.41-8.65 and OR 1.30, CI 1.25-1.35, respectively), and endometriosis can be associated with a range of obstetric and fetal complications including preterm delivery (OR 1.38, CI 1.01-1.89), caesarean section delivery (OR 1.98 CI 1.64-2.38), and neonatal unit admission following delivery (OR 1.29, CI 1.07-1.55).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Adenomyosis and the subtypes of endometriosis may have specific complication profiles though further evidence is needed to be able to draw conclusions. Several known pregnancy complications are likely to be associated with these conditions. The complications are possibly caused by dysfunctional uterine changes leading to implantation and placentation issues and therefore could potentially have far-reaching consequences as suggested by Barker's hypothesis. Our findings would suggest that women with these conditions should ideally receive pre-natal counselling and should be considered higher risk in pregnancy and at delivery, until evidence to the contrary is available. In order to expand our knowledge of these conditions and better advise on future management of these patients in reproductive and maternal medicine, a more unified approach to studying fertility and reproductive outcomes with longer term follow-up of the offspring and attention to the subtype of disease is necessary.

Exploring the challenges for a new classification of adenomyosis

The availability of non-invasive diagnostic tests is an important factor in the renewed interest in adenomyosis, as the disease can now be more accurately mapped in the uterus without a need for hysterectomy. An agreed system for classifying and reporting the condition will enhance our understanding of the disease and is envisaged to enable comparison of research studies and treatment outcomes. In this review, we assess previous and more recent attempts at producing a taxonomy, especially in view of the latest proposal for subdivision of adenomyosis into an internal and an external variant. In this context, we also explore the uncertainties linked to classifying involvement of the uterovesical pouch, the pouch of Douglas and lesions in the outer myometrium. Two opposing hypotheses are forwarded to explain the pathogenesis of these variants, namely that disease localized in these areas originates from an invasion by uterine adenomyosis of peritoneal organs; alternatively, that lesions present in the outer myometrium originate from peritoneal endometriosis. At the root of debates around these opposing theories of pathogenesis is fragmentary evidence. Because of the limitations of currently available evidence, and until this issue is resolved, broad agreement on a hypothesis to underpin any proposed classification is unlikely.

Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease defined as the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus, which causes pelvic pain and infertility. This disease should be viewed as a public health problem with a major effect on the quality of life of women as well as being a substantial economic burden. In light of the considerable progress with diagnostic imaging (for example, transvaginal ultrasound and MRI), exploratory laparoscopy should no longer be used to diagnose endometriotic lesions. Instead, diagnosis of endometriosis should be based on a structured process involving the combination of patient interviews, clinical examination and imaging. Notably, a diagnosis of endometriosis often leads to immediate surgery. Therefore, rethinking the diagnosis and management of endometriosis is warranted. Instead of assessing endometriosis on the day of the diagnosis, gynaecologists should consider the patient's 'endometriosis life'. Medical treatment is the first-line therapeutic option for patients with pelvic pain and no desire for immediate pregnancy. In women with infertility, careful consideration should be made regarding whether to provide assisted reproductive technologies prior to performing endometriosis surgery. Modern endometriosis management should be individualized with a patient-centred, multi-modal and interdisciplinary integrated approach.

Ureteral endometriosis: a systematic review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, risk of malignant transformation and fertility

BACKGROUND

The ureter is the second most common site affected by urinary tract endometriosis, after the bladder. Optimal strategies in the diagnosis and treatment of ureteral endometriosis (UE) are not yet well defined.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The aim of this study was to systematically review evidence regarding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, medical and surgical treatment, impact on fertility and risk of malignant transformation of UE.

SEARCH METHODS

A systematic literature review, by searching the MEDLINE and PUBMED database until April 2018, was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement and was registered in the PROSPERO registry (www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO CRD42017060065). A total of 67 articles were selected to be included in this review.

OUTCOMES

The involvement of the ureter by endometriosis is often asymptomatic or leads to non-specific symptoms. When the diagnosis is delayed, UE may lead to persistent hydronephrosis and eventually loss of renal function. Ultrasonography is the first-line technique for the assessment of UE; alternatively, magnetic resonance imaging provides an evaluation of ureteral type involvement. The surgical treatment of UE aims to relieve ureteral obstruction and avoid disease recurrence. It includes conservative ureterolysis or radical approaches, such as ureterectomy with end-to-end anastomosis or ureteroneocystostomy performed in relation to the type of ureteral involvement. Fertility and pregnancy outcomes are in line with those observed after surgical treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). Current evidence does not support the potential risk of malignant transformation of UE.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

In this article, we review available evidence on ureteral endometriosis, providing a useful tool to guide physicians in the management of this disease. Diagnosis and management of UE remain a challenge. In relation to the degree of ureteral involvement and the association with other DIE implants, the surgical approach should be planned and carried out in an interdisciplinary collaboration between gynecologist and urologist.

Bowel surgery as a fertility-enhancing procedure in patients with colorectal endometriosis: methodological, pathogenic and ethical issues

Bowel surgery for colorectal endometriosis is being promoted to infertile women without severe sub-occlusive symptoms, with the objective of improving the likelihood of conception. Contrary to rectal shaving, bowel surgery involving full-thickness disk excision and segmental resection entails opening of the intestinal lumen thus increasing the risk of postoperative infectious complications. About 1 in 10 patients undergoing colorectal resection for intestinal endometriosis will experience severe sequelae, including anastomotic dehiscence, rectovaginal fistula formation, and bladder and bowel denervation. Similar to other surgical procedures aiming at enhancing fertility in women with endometriosis, bowel surgery has been introduced into clinical practice without adequate evaluation through randomized controlled trials. According to systematic literature reviews based mainly on case series, the incremental gain of adding bowel procedures to standard surgery appears uncertain in terms of pregnancy rate after both natural attempts and IVF. Considering the methodological drawbacks and the high risk of bias in the available observational studies, it is not possible to exclude the suggestion that the benefit of colorectal surgery has been overestimated. Given the risk of harms to women's health and the important ethical implications, less emphasis should be put on strict statistical significance and more emphasis should be placed on the magnitude of the effect size. In this regard, the published data may not be generalizable, as the surgeons publishing their results may not be representative of all surgeons. Until the results of adequately designed and conducted RCTs are available, colorectal surgery with the sole intent of improving the reproductive performance of infertile patients with intestinal endometriosis should be performed exclusively within research settings and by highly experienced surgeons. Women should be informed about the uncertainties regarding the harms and benefits of bowel surgery in different clinical conditions, and preoperative counselling must be conducted impartially with the objective of achieving a truly shared medical decision.

Recent advances in understanding and managing adenomyosis

Adenomyosis is a benign uterine disorder in which endometrial glands and stroma are pathologically demonstrated in the uterine myometrium and it is considered a specific entity in the PALM-COEIN FIGO (polyp; adenomyosis; leiomyoma; malignancy and hyperplasia; coagulopathy; ovulatory dysfunction; endometrial; iatrogenic; and not yet classified - International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). Although it has always been considered the classic condition of multiparous women over 40 years old who have pain and heavy menstrual bleeding, diagnosed at hysterectomy, the epidemiological scenario has completely changed. Adenomyosis is increasingly identified in young women with pain, AUB, infertility, or no symptoms by using imaging techniques such as transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance. However, there is no agreement on the definition and classification of adenomyotic lesions from both the histopathology and the imaging point of view, and the diagnosis remains difficult and unclear. A uniform and shared reporting system needs to be implemented in order to improve our understanding on imaging features, their relationship with pathogenic theories, and their importance in terms of clinical symptoms and response to treatment. In fact, adenomyosis pathogenesis remains elusive and not a single theory can explain all of the different phenotypes of the disease. Furthermore, adenomyosis often coexists with other gynecological conditions, such as endometriosis and uterine fibroids, increasing the heterogeneity of available data. Treatment requires a lifelong management plan as the disease has a negative impact on quality of life in terms of menstrual symptoms, fertility, and pregnancy outcome and has a high risk of miscarriage and obstetric complications.

Symptoms and classification of uterine adenomyosis, including the place of hysteroscopy in diagnosis

Where histology used the presence of glands and/or stroma in the myometrium as pathognomonic for adenomyosis, imaging uses the appearance of the myometrium, the presence of striations, related to the presence of endometrial tissue within the myometrium, the presence of intramyometrial cystic structures and the size and asymmetry of the uterus to identify adenomyosis. Preliminary reports show a good correlation between the features detected by imaging and the histological findings. Symptoms associated with adenomyosis are abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain (dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia), and impaired reproduction. However a high incidence of existing comorbidity like fibroids and endometriosis makes it difficult to attribute a specific pathognomonic symptom to adenomyosis. Heterogeneity in the reported pregnancy rates after assisted reproduction is due to the use of different ovarian stimulation protocols and absence of a correct description of the adenomyotic pathology. Current efforts to classify the disease contributed a lot in elucidated the potential characteristics that a classification system should be relied on. The need for a comprehensive, user friendly, and clear categorization of adenomyosis including the pattern, location, histological variants, and the myometrial zone seems to be an urgent need. With the uterus as a possible unifying link between adenomyosis and endometriosis, exploration of the uterus should not only be restricted to the hysteroscopic exploration of the uterine cavity but in a fusion with ultrasound.

Operation, hormone therapy and recovery of the patients with severe forms of adenomyosis

Endometriosis is among the prevalent gynecological diseases and diagnosed in 10% of women of reproductive age. Endometriosis/adenomyosis is becoming increasingly a health-social problem, which is associated with severe clinical manifestations and recurrent disease which has a negative effect on quality of life, women ability to work and her reproductive function. This article presents modern approaches of drug therapy to treat severe forms of adenomyosis. We have reviewed recent major studies in the field of surgical treatment of this disease, analyzed the main stages of disease progress and the results of our surgeries. Here, we are presenting our own results of long-term post-operative hormonal therapy and complex medical treatment.

Treatment options and reproductive outcome for adenomyosis-associated infertility

PURPOSE

Adenomyosis is a benign gynecological disease mostly diagnosed in the forth and fifth decades. The recent improvement of the diagnostic tools and a better understanding of the pathology allowed clinicians to postulate a possible relationship between adenomyosis and infertility and to diagnose it in younger asymptomatic women during infertility work-up. Purpose of this article is to review the different theories regarding the possible correlation between adenomyosis and infertility and to discuss the treatment options and the final reproductive outcome after the treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We search Pubmed for articles published in the English language with the use of the following MeSH search terms: "adenomyosis" combined with "treatment" and "fertility outcome" with the restriction to the human species. A manual search of review articles and cross-references completed the search. All selected articles were assessed for study design, patients characteristic, diagnosis of adenomyosis, type of treatment, post-treatment rates of conception, full-term pregnancy and completeness of information of the data sets.

RESULTS

Limited data are available concerning the efficacy of the different treatment options of adenomyosis on fertility outcome and the only ones published are retrospective evaluations or small case series.

CONCLUSIONS

Adenomyosis represents a common gynecological disorder with a negative impact on fertility. However, it remains challenging to establish if adenomyosis is the only cause of the infertility or not, because patients, in both case and control groups, may be affected by concomitant endometriosis. Further studies are required to determine the reason of implantation failure in women with adenomyosis and the impact of adenomyosis on infertile women with or without endometriosis.

[Deeply infiltrating endometriosis and infertility: CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]

Deeply infiltrating endometriosis is a severe form of the disease, defined by endometriotic tissue peritoneal infiltration. The disease may involve the rectovaginal septum, uterosacral ligaments, digestive tract or bladder. Deeply infiltrating endometriosis is responsible for disabling pain and infertility. The purpose of these recommendations is to answer the following question: in case of deeply infiltrating endometriosis associated infertility, what is the best therapeutic strategy? First-line surgery and then in vitro fertilization (IVF) in case of persistent infertility or first-line IVF, without surgery? After exhaustive literature analysis, we suggest the following recommendations: studies focusing on spontaneous fertility of infertile patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis found spontaneous pregnancy rates about 10%. Treatment should be considered in infertile women with deeply infiltrating endometriosis when they wish to conceive. First-line IVF is a good option in case of no operated deeply infiltrating endometriosis associated infertility. Pregnancy rates (spontaneous and following assisted reproductive techniques) after surgery (deep lesions without colorectal involvement) varie from 40 to 85%. After colorectal endometriosis resection, pregnancy rates vary from 47 to 59%. The studies comparing the pregnancy rates after IVF, whether or not preceded by surgery, are contradictory and do not allow, to date, to conclude on the interest of any surgical management of deep lesions before IVF. In case of alteration of ovarian reserve parameters (age, AMH, antral follicle count), there is no argument to recommend first-line surgery or IVF. The study of the literature does not identify any prognostic factors, allowing to chose between surgical management or IVF. The use of IVF in the indication "deep infiltrating endometriosis" allows satisfactory pregnancy rates without significant risk, regarding disease progression or oocyte retrieval procedure morbidity.

Fertility-Sparing Treatment of Adenomyosis in Patients With Infertility: A Systematic Review of Current Options

Adenomyosis is a benign gynecological disease observed in women in their reproductive age. Recent studies have shown that adenomyosis might be a relevant factor for infertility, either impairing implantation or leading to early miscarriage. However, conservative treatment of infertility related to adenomyosis is still unclear. This study systematically reviews the literature for the reproductive outcomes of the available conservative treatments for patients with adenomyosis-associated infertility. We conducted a search in PubMed/Medline for studies in English published in the last 7 years and included 16 studies. Six studies evaluated surgical treatments of adenomyosis. When considering only spontaneous pregnancies, the overall clinical pregnancy rate was very low (18.2%). However, when using GnRH analogues for 24 weeks after surgery, the pooled spontaneous pregnancy rate was higher (40.7% vs 15.0%; P = .002). No significant difference was observed in the other outcomes. Ten studies evaluated exclusive assisted reproductive techniques for infertility related to adenomyosis and showed that the long stimulation protocol had better outcomes compared to short stimulation protocol in pregnancy rate (43.3% vs 31.8%; P = .0001), live birth (43.0% vs 23.1%; P = .005), and miscarriage (18.5% vs 31.1%; P < .0001).

From Clinical Symptoms to MR Imaging: Diagnostic Steps in Adenomyosis

Adenomyosis or endometriosis genitalis interna is a frequent benign disease of women in fertile age. It causes symptoms like bleeding disorders and dysmenorrhea and seems to have a negative effect on fertility. Adenomyosis can be part of a complex genital and extragenital endometriosis but also can be found as a solitary uterine disease. While peritoneal endometriosis can be easily diagnosed by laparoscopy with subsequent biopsy, the determination of adenomyosis is difficult. In the following literature review, the diagnostic methods clinical history and symptoms, gynecological examination, 2D and 3D transvaginal ultrasound, MRI, hysteroscopy, and laparoscopy will be discussed step by step in order to evaluate their predictive value in the diagnosis of adenomyosis.

Sonographic Signs of Adenomyosis Are Prevalent in Women Undergoing Surgery for Endometriosis and May Suggest a Higher Risk of Infertility

Objectives

To determine the prevalence of ultrasound features suggestive of adenomyosis in women undergoing surgery for endometriosis compared with a control group of healthy women without endometriosis.

Methods

Retrospective case-control study comparing women with intractable pain or infertility, who underwent transvaginal ultrasound and subsequent laparoscopic surgery, with a control group of healthy women without a previous history of endometriosis. A diagnosis of adenomyosis on TVUS was made based on asymmetrical myometrial thickening, linear striations, myometrial cysts, hyperechoic islands, irregular endometrial-myometrial junction, parallel shadowing, and localized adenomyomas and analyzed for one sign and for three or more signs.

Results

The study and control groups included 94 and 60 women, respectively. In the study group, women were younger and had more dysmenorrhea and infertility symptoms. The presence of any sonographic feature of adenomyosis, as well as three or more signs, was found to be more prevalent in the study group, which persisted after controlling for age, for all features but linear striations. Women in the study group who had five or more sonographic features of adenomyosis had more than a threefold risk of suffering from infertility (OR = 3.19, p = 0.015, 95% CI; 1.25–8.17). There was no association with disease severity at surgery.

Conclusions

Sonographic features of adenomyosis are more prevalent in women undergoing surgery for endometriosis compared to healthy controls. Women with more than five features had an increased risk of infertility.

Endometriosis and Infertility: A Systematic Review

Endometriosis is one of the most common gynaecological conditions affecting 6% to 12% of women in the reproductive age group. It can be found in 35% to 45% of women who are trying to conceive and are infertile. Infertility is one of the most common problems associated with endometriosis. This review will look at the evidence that endometriosis may lead to infertility and the data looking at whether surgical correction of endometriosis may improve fertility outcomes.