Fertility preservation for patients affected by endometriosis should ideally be carried out before surgery

Fertility preservation in women with endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is a chronic disease that can compromise fertility in up to 30-50% of affected patients, and it is estimated that patients affected by endometriosis represent about 10% of patients undergoing ART treatments. The hypothesized underlying mechanisms explaining infertility are various, but great attention has been given to the relationship between ovarian endometriomas and reduced ovarian reserve.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

Infertility in patients with endometriosis does not have univocal management, since surgical therapy can increase the chances of natural conception, but at the same time increases the risk of damage to the ovarian reserve. In some cases, IVF procedures should be considered instead of surgery, within a personalized strategy. It has therefore been proposed that patients with endometriosis are eligible for fertility preservation.

SEARCH METHODS

This article is based on a critical review of literature on peer-reviewed article indexing databases including PubMed, Scopus and Medline, using as keywords: 'fertility preservation', 'oocyte vitrification', 'endometriosis', 'endometrioma', 'ovarian reserve' and 'in vitro fertilization'.

OUTCOMES

Data regarding the feasibility of oocyte cryopreservation in patients with endometriosis have increased over recent years, indicating that these patients seem to have the same number of oocytes retrieved and IVF outcomes similar to those who perform fertility preservation for other indications. However, probably due to a reduced ovarian reserve, several cycles of ovarian stimulation may be needed to gather a suitable number of retrieved oocytes per patient. Age, ovarian reserve, and previous ovarian surgery are the main factors affecting the success of fertility preservation. Bilateral endometriomas, a history of unilateral endometrioma surgery with a contralateral recurrence, and preoperative reduced ovarian reserve are the most common indications for fertility preservation. The choice between primary surgery and ART is often complex, requiring a therapeutic strategy tailored to the patient's clinical characteristics and needs, such as age, type and severity of endometriosis lesions, presence of symptoms, surgical history, and desire for pregnancy.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The development of endometriosis-related infertility and the severity of ovarian damage due to endometriosis lesions per se or their surgical treatment are difficult to predict, and data are lacking concerning which subgroups of patients with endometriosis might benefit most from fertility preservation.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Women with endometriosis, and in particular women with bilateral ovarian endometriomas or recurrent surgery on the ovaries, should be advised about risk of ovarian reserve damage. Oocyte cryopreservation is an established technique that has been demonstrated as feasible and successful for these patients; however, the specific indications have not yet been established.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

There are no funding sources for the study and no conflicts of interest to declare.

Fertility preservation in women with endometriosis: Oocyte cryopreservation and other techniques

In recent years, advancements in cryopreservation techniques for oocytes, embryos, and ovarian tissue have enabled offering fertility preservation (FP) options to women with endometriosis. It is recommended to always conduct specialized counselling on FP, especially before considering surgical interventions for endometriosis. The decision regarding the methods of FP, the timing, and to which women affected by endometriosis these techniques should be offered are still subjects of discussion. However, several studies suggest that it can be proposed before surgical interventions for endometriosis, particularly if the patient is undergoing mono or bilateral endometrioma surgery. The most recommended technique is ovarian stimulation, followed by oocyte cryopreservation. Nevertheless, the literature contains various studies describing FP through embryo cryopreservation or the retrieval and cryopreservation of ovarian tissue.

Impact of Endometriosis Surgery on In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Endometriosis-related infertility remains a therapeutic challenge. A burning issue in this field of research is determining whether pre-assisted reproductive technology (ART) surgery may be of some benefit in terms of reproductive outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at comparing ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) and/or live birth rates (LBR) in patients who underwent endometriosis surgery before ART (IVF/ICSI) in comparison with patients who underwent first-line ART (IVF/ICSI). Searches were conducted from January 1990 to June 2021 on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library using the following search terms: endometriosis, surgery, reproductive outcomes, and IVF/ICSI. The primary outcomes were OPR or LBR. A total of 19 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant differences in LBR [0.91[0.63, 1.30]; I2 = 66%; n = 11], OPR [1.28[0.66, 2.49]; I2 = 60%; n = 3], and early pregnancy loss rate [0.88[0.62, 1.25]; I2 = 0%; n = 7] per cycle were found when comparing patients who underwent endometriosis surgery before IVF/ICSI and those who did not. After the exclusion of the studies with high risks of bias, the LBR per cycle was significantly reduced in the case of surgical treatment before IVF/ICSI [0.53[0.33, 0.86]; I2 = 30%; n = 4]. These data urge the clinician to carefully weigh the pros and cons before referring infertile patients with endometriosis to surgery before IVF, highlighting the key role of multidisciplinary referral centers.

IVF stimulation protocols and outcomes in women with endometriosis

Endometriosis is a complex medical condition with a high prevalence in women of reproductive age. Fertility is compromised in patients with endometriosis, and success in IVF treatments has been a challenge leading to evaluation of different stimulation protocols. The long-standing debate between GnRH agonist long protocols and short GnRH antagonist protocols is being resolved in favor of the latter, since in addition to presenting equivalent results with respect to the traditional option, they have the additional benefit of safety. The good results derived from vitrification techniques have led to the development of new stimulation strategies, such as progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS), with a greater degree of approval among patients. None of the stimulation protocols currently applied in women with endometriosis has been shown to be superior, so early intervention with an Assisted Reproduction treatment, regardless of the chosen protocol, can provide these women with good chances of motherhood. Women with endometrioma should be counseled for fertility preservation before planned ovarian endometrioma excision. The number of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos can be increased by repeated cycles.

Oocyte Cryopreservation in Women with Ovarian Endometriosis

Ovarian endometriosis is a gynecological condition that is closely associated with infertility-from its pathogenesis to treatment modalities, this condition presents a challenge both for patients and clinicians alike when seeking conception, due to low AMH levels, peritoneal inflammation, and the inadvertent removal of healthy ovarian parenchyma at surgery. In fact, around half of endometriosis patients seeking fertility require tertiary-level assisted reproduction techniques to achieve a live birth. Oocyte cryopreservation, a procedure initially designed for oncology patients, has emerged over recent years as a very promising treatment strategy for patients who have been diagnosed with ovarian endometriosis in order to preserve their fertility and obtain a live birth at a later stage in their lives. Counseling patients about oocyte preservation techniques at an early stage in the diagnosis, ideally before the age of 35 and especially prior to any surgical treatment, provides an excellent opportunity to discuss future fertility and the benefits associated with oocyte cryopreservation.

Fertility Preservation in Women with Endometriosis

Several mechanisms have been implicated in the pathogenesis of endometriosis-related infertility. For patients considering surgery, the risk of iatrogenic injury is among the most important factors in the context of fertility preservation, along with age and individual reproductive goals. In the case of endometrioma excision, evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates the negative impact of surgery on ovarian reserve, with significant reductions in antimullerian hormone (up to 30% in unilateral versus up to 44% in bilateral endometriomas). The surgical endometriosis patient should be thoroughly counseled regarding fertility preservation and discussion should include tissue, embryo, and oocyte cryopreservation options. For the latter, data support cryopreservation of 10-15 oocytes in women ≤35 years and over 20 for those >35 years for a realistic chance to achieve one or more live births. When performing surgical interventions for endometriosis, reproductive surgeons should employ fertility-conserving surgical methods to reduce the likelihood of postoperative iatrogenic diminished ovarian reserve.

Adolescent endometriosis: prevalence increases with age on magnetic resonance imaging scan

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of ovarian endometrioma (OMA) and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) in adolescents presenting with severe dysmenorrhea.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Clinic.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 345 adolescents aged 12-20 years referred to the radiologic MRI department unit between September 2019 and June 2020.

INTERVENTION(S)

Multiplanar pelvic MRI with cine MRI was performed. Data on the medical history with systematic questioning were collected for each patient before the scan.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Data on the endometriosis phenotypes (OMA and/or DIE), distribution of anatomical lesions, and adenomyosis were evaluated and recorded using a dedicated MRI spreadsheet. Myometrial contractions were systematically reported for each case. The data were correlated with the characteristics of the patients and severity of painful symptoms evaluated using a visual analog scale.

RESULT(S)

The prevalence rates of endometriosis and adenomyosis were 39.3% (121 patients) and 11.4% (35 patients), respectively. Among the adolescents with endometriosis, 25 (20.7%) presented with OMA, and 107 (88.4%) presented with DIE. The odds ratios (confidence intervals) for each pairwise comparison between the age distributions were 2.3 (1.4-3.8) for 15-18 vs. <15 years of age and 3.3 (1.2-8.5) for 18-20 vs. <15 years of age, highlighting a predominance of cases after 18 years of age. Uterine contractions were visualized in 34.4% of cases, with no particular association with endometriosis. No clinical risk factor was identified as being particularly associated with endometriosis. Notably, the visual analog scale score was the same for cases with and without endometriosis.

CONCLUSION(S)

Severe endometriosis phenotypes (OMA and/or DIE) can be observed in adolescents with intense dysmenorrhea, with a linear increase in prevalence over time resulting in a clear predominance after 18 years of age. Endometriosis in adolescents is a challenging clinical problem with a long delay in diagnosis. Imaging can help reduce this delay in young patients with suggestive symptoms.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05153512.

Fertility preservation for women with ovarian endometriosis: results from a retrospective cohort study

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the outcome of fertility-preservation treatments in women with endometrioma, especially those with endometrioma larger than 4 cm?

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study. Women with definitive diagnosis of ovarian endometriosis (by histology or ultrasound), who underwent fertility-preservation treatment in two IVF units between 2016 and 2021, were included. As some women cryopreserved oocytes and other embryos, the primary outcome was the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved.

RESULTS

Seventy-one women with ovarian endometriosis (OMA) underwent 138 fertility-preservation cycles. The median age of patients was 31 years. Forty out of 71 (56%) women underwent at least one surgery for OMA before fertility-preservation treatment. Multivariate analysis of each patient's first cycle was used. Women who underwent OMA surgery before fertility-preservation treatment had a 51.7% reduction (95% CI 26.1 to 68.5, P = 0.001) in the number of MII oocytes compared with women with OMA who did not undergo surgery. Among a subgroup who did not undergo surgery, those with an endometrioma larger than 4 cm had similar anti-Müllerian hormone concentration (2.6 ng/ml versus 2.1 ng/ml), number of oocytes retrieved (9 versus 9) and number of MII oocytes (7.6 versus seven 7) compared with women with an endometrioma of 4 cm or less.

CONCLUSIONS

Discussing fertility-preservation treatment options with patients with OMA is recommended, especially if surgery is planned.

Fertility preservation in women with benign gynaecological conditions

Although a wealth of data has been published regarding fertility preservation (FP) in women with malignant diseases who receive gonadotoxic treatment, the role of FP in non-malignant conditions has been studied to a much lesser extent. These include benign haematological, autoimmune, and genetic disorders, as well as a multitude of benign gynaecological conditions (BGCs) that may compromise ovarian reserve and/or reproductive potential due to pathogenic mechanisms or as a result of medical or surgical treatments. Alongside accumulating data that document the reproductive potential of cryopreserved oocytes and ovarian tissue, there is potential interest in FP for women with BGCs at risk of infertility; however, there are currently insufficient data about FP in women with BGCs to develop guidelines for clinical practice. The purpose of this article is to appraise the available evidence regarding FP for BGC and discuss potential strategies for FP based on estimated ovarian impairment and on short-term and long-term reproductive goals of patients. Cost-effectiveness considerations and patients' perspectives will also be discussed.

Oocyte Cryopreservation in Patients with Endometriosis: Current Knowledge and Number Needed to Treat

The rise of oocytes cryopreservation (OOC) in assisted reproductive techniques allows fertility preservation (FP) in an increasing number of indications. Endometriosis, a highly prevalent disease, potentially impairing ovarian reserve, seems, therefore, an interesting indication for it. The purpose of this study is to summarize the available evidence concerning FP by OOC in women with endometriosis and to calculate the number needed to treat (NNT). In total, 272 articles related to this topic were identified in PubMed. Eight studies were eligible for the review. In order to shed some light, a SWOT analysis was performed and the argument pros and cons were developed. The NNT calculated of OOC was 16, meaning that 16 women need to perform an OOC for one of them to have a child that she would not have had without this technique. In conclusion, OOC must be discussed with patients who suffer from endometriosis since it is an effective technique of FP, which can allow these patients to succeed a pregnancy that they otherwise would not have achieved. Nevertheless, it should not be performed in all patients as there is still a lack of robust socio-economic and risk–benefit data.