Treatment of symptomatic uterine adenomyosis with linzagolix, an oral gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist: a pilot study

Efficacy and safety of relugolix combination therapy in women with uterine fibroids and adenomyosis: subgroup analysis of LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of relugolix combination therapy in women with uterine fibroids (UFs) and concomitant ultrasound-diagnosed adenomyosis.

DESIGN

This post hoc analysis used pooled data from completers of the pivotal LIBERTY studies. The subgroup of women with adenomyosis and UFs was compared with the overall study population on selected efficacy and safety endpoints.

SUBJECTS

Premenopausal women (aged 18-50 years) with diagnosed UFs (confirmed by ultrasonography) and heavy menstrual bleeding (assessed by the alkaline hematin method).

INTERVENTION

Once-daily relugolix combination therapy (40 mg relugolix, 1 mg estradiol, and 0.5 mg of norethindrone acetate) or placebo for 24 weeks, or delayed relugolix combination therapy (40 mg of relugolix monotherapy for 12 weeks, followed by relugolix combination therapy for 12 weeks).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Endpoints included the percentage of women with concomitant adenomyosis, the proportion of treatment responders (achieved or maintained a menstrual blood loss <80 mL and ≥50% reduction in menstrual blood loss volume from baseline over the last 35 days of treatment), the proportion of women achieving or maintaining amenorrhea over the last 35 days of treatment, and the change from baseline to week 24 in uterine volume and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 111 women (18.2%) had a baseline diagnosis of concomitant adenomyosis (37 in the relugolix combination therapy group, 45 in the delayed relugolix combination therapy group, 29 in the placebo group) and were included in this analysis. Of women with adenomyosis, 83.8% in the relugolix combination therapy group were treatment responders compared with 27.6% in the placebo group. Amenorrhea was achieved in 64.9% of women with adenomyosis treated with relugolix combination therapy and in 6.9% of women treated with placebo. The least square mean uterine volume of women with adenomyosis decreased by 22.2% and 5.8% in the relugolix combination therapy and placebo groups, respectively. Results for the above outcomes in the relugolix combination therapy population were similar to the delayed relugolix combination therapy group.

CONCLUSION

Efficacy outcomes in women with adenomyosis and UFs were comparable with those in women from the overall LIBERTY study population.

Dienogest treatment of symptomatic adenomyosis: An in-depth meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Adenomyosis is a common gynecological disease and a major contributor to dysmenorrhea that substantially reduces the quality of life of the affected. Dienogest has emerged as a promising drug for treating adenomyosis. A few systematic reviews and meta-analyses on this topic have been published recently. However, these meta-analyses were typically based on 2-7 studies, even though numerical data could have been extracted and more studies have been published. Moreover, it is unclear whether there is any characteristic of the patients that is associated with more pronounced improvement after treatment, or which patient subgroup, if any, would benefit most from the dienogest treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of dienogest in alleviating dysmenorrhea associated with adenomyosis and identifying study/patient characteristics that contribute to a better therapeutic response.

DESIGN

An in-depth meta-analysis incorporating more recent published studies.

METHODS

An in-depth meta-analysis of 14 studies published up to March 2024, involving 637 patients was conducted, using the visual analog scale (VAS) scores on dysmenorrhea severity as the primary outcome measure. Subgroup analyses and multivariable regression were performed to explore potential factors influencing the treatment effect.

RESULTS

Dienogest significantly improved dysmenorrhea, with a mean reduction in VAS scores of 6 on a 10-point scale. Subgroup analyses indicated that dienogest was effective across varying severities of dysmenorrhea and different treatment durations. Notably, patients with higher baseline VAS scores and longer treatment durations experienced greater reductions in VAS scores.

CONCLUSION

Dienogest substantially alleviates dysmenorrhea in women with adenomyosis, particularly among those with severe baseline dysmenorrhea and extended treatment periods. However, variability in patient responses and the potential for adverse effects underscores the importance of individualized treatment strategies. Further large-scale, long-term comparative studies and randomized clinical trials are warranted to optimize treatment outcomes and better understand patient-specific factors.

Current Medical Therapy for Adenomyosis: From Bench to Bedside

Adenomyosis, characterized by the growth of endometrial tissue within the uterine wall, poses significant challenges in treatment. The literature primarily focuses on managing abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and dysmenorrhea, the main symptoms of adenomyosis. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and tranexamic acid provide limited support for mild symptoms or symptom re-exacerbation during hormone therapy. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is commonly employed in adenomyosis management, showing promise in symptom improvement and reducing uterine size, despite the lack of standardized guidelines. Dienogest (DNG) also exhibits potential benefits, but limited evidence hinders treatment recommendations. Danazol, while effective, is limited by androgenic side effects. Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) may be less effective than progestins but can be considered for contraception in young patients. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists effectively manage symptoms but induce menopausal symptoms with prolonged use. GnRH antagonists are a recent option requiring further investigation. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) show promise in alleviating AUB and pelvic pain, but their safety necessitates exploration and limited use within trials for refractory patients. This review highlights the complexity of diagnosing adenomyosis, its coexistence with endometriosis and uterine leiomyomas, and its impact on fertility and quality of life, complicating treatment decisions. It emphasizes the need for research on guidelines for medical management, fertility outcomes, long-term effects of therapies, and exploration of new investigational targets. Future research should optimize therapeutic strategies, expand our understanding of adenomyosis and its management, and establish evidence-based guidelines to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Changes in adenomyosis following elagolix vs leuprolide treatment in a patient with pelvic pain and infertility: A case report

Adenomyosis is a uterine form of endometriosis that poses unique challenges in the management of infertility. Severe pelvic pain and menorrhagia associated with these conditions are commonly managed with intramuscular injections of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (leuprolide acetate). Since receiving approval by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2018, a novel oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, elagolix, has also been increasingly used to manage endometriosis-associated pain. However, the efficacy of elagolix in the treatment of adenomyosis and infertility remains uncertain. In this clinical case of an infertile patient with endometriosis and diminished ovarian reserve, treatment with elagolix effectively controlled her severe endometriosis-related pelvic pain but, surprisingly, failed to prevent concurrent progression of adenomyosis. Subsequently, elagolix was changed to treatment with leuprolide acetate, which led to improvement of adenomyosis in preparation for an embryo transfer during an in vitro fertilization cycle. Women's health providers should be aware that elagolix may not as effectively suppress adenomyosis as leuprolide acetate, particularly in infertility patients undergoing treatment with assisted reproductive technologies.

Nonsurgical management of adenomyosis: an overview of current evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adenomyosis is a condition where endometrium-like tissue spreads within the myometrium. Although its prevalence in the general population is not exactly known, its clinical manifestations are well established and include pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea (painful periods), heavy menstrual bleeding and subfertility [1] . Adenomyosis often coexists with other gynaecological conditions, such as endometriosis or fibroids, and may cloud the clinical presentation [2] . The aim of this article is to review current noninterventional, nonsurgical management modalities and wherever possible offer information that allows women to make safe and informed choices regarding their treatment options.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies support that medical strategies, including the Mirena coil, Dienogest and GnRH antagonists, are efficient in improving adenomyosis-associated symptoms. High-quality evidence is scarce and is needed to properly counsel women with this condition. Future research should prioritize overall pain, menstrual bleeding, quality of life and live birth as primary outcomes and assess women with different grades of adenomyosis.

SUMMARY

This review provides the most current evidence with regards to the nonsurgical management of adenomyosis. In light of the paucity and low quality of existing data, high-quality trials are needed to definitely determine the impact of conservative and medical treatment on the clinical management of adenomyosis.

Uterine Adenomyosis Treated by Linzagolix, an Oral Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Antagonist: A Pilot Study with a New 'Hit Hard First and then Maintain' Regimen of Administration

(1) Background: The aim of the present pilot study was to study the effect of a new oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist on adenomyosis. (2) Methods: Eight premenopausal women, aged between 37 and 45 years, presenting with heavy menstrual bleeding, pelvic pain, and dysmenorrhea due to diffuse and disseminated uterine adenomyosis, confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), received 200 mg linzagolix once daily for a period of 12 weeks, after which they were switched to 100 mg linzagolix once daily for another 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in volume of the adenomyotic uterus from baseline to 24 weeks, evaluated by MRI. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the change in uterine volume from baseline to 12 and 36 weeks by MRI, and also weeks 12, 24, and 36 assessed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS). Other endpoints were overall pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, non-menstrual pelvic pain, dyspareunia, amenorrhea, quality of life measures, bone mineral density (BMD), junctional zone thickness, and serum estradiol values. (3) Results: Median serum estradiol was suppressed below 20 pg/mL during the 12 weeks on linzagolix 200 mg, and maintained below 60 pg/mL during the second 12 weeks on linzagolix 100 mg. At baseline, the mean ± SD uterine volume was 333 ± 250 cm³. After 24 weeks of treatment, it was 204 ± 126 cm³, a reduction of 32% (p = 0.0057). After 12 weeks, the mean uterine volume was 159 ± 95 cm³, a reduction of 55% from baseline (p = 0.0001). A similar pattern was observed when uterine volume was assessed by TVUS. Improvements in overall pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, non-menstrual pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and dyschezia, as well as quality of life measured using the EHP-30 were also observed. Mean percentage BMD loss at 24 weeks was, respectively, -2.4%, -1.3%, and -4.1% for the spine, femoral neck, and total hip. The most common adverse events were hot flushes, which occurred in 6/8 women during the first 12 weeks, and 1/8 women between 12 and 24 weeks. (4) Conclusions: Linzagolix at a dose of 200 mg/day reduced uterine volume, and improved clinically relevant symptoms. Treatment with 100 mg thereafter retains the therapeutic benefits of the starting dose while minimizing side effects. This 'hit hard first and then maintain' approach may be the optimal way to treat women with symptomatic adenomyosis.

Conservative Management of Uterine Adenomyosis: Medical vs. Surgical Approach

Uterine adenomyosis is a commonly encountered estrogen-dependent disease in reproductive-age women, causing heavy menstrual bleeding, intense pelvic pain, and infertility. Although adenomyosis was previously considered a disease of multiparous women, it is becoming increasingly evident that it also affects younger nulliparous women and may compromise their fertility potential. It is clear that hysterectomy, the standard approach to definitively manage the disease, is not an option for patients wishing to preserve their fertility, so there is an urgent need to develop novel conservative strategies. We searched the current literature for available methods for conservative management of adenomyosis, including both pharmacological and surgical approaches. There is no existing drug that can cure adenomyosis at present, but some off-label treatment options may be used to tackle disease symptoms and improve fertility outcomes. Adenomyosis in patients wishing to conceive can be 'treated' by conservative surgery, though these procedures require highly experienced surgeons and pose a considerable risk of uterine rupture during subsequent pregnancies. While currently available options for conservative management of adenomyosis do have some capacity for alleviating symptoms and enhancing patient fertility perspectives, more effective new options are needed, with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists showing encouraging results in preliminary studies.